Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Let's talk parsing charts 📊📈. Last week we released ParseBench, the first document OCR benchmark for AI agents. New in ParseBench: ChartDataPointMatch. Most document look at a chart and OCR the caption. Agents need the actual numbers. That's the gap between "OCR'd the text around the chart" and "actually... show more

LlamaIndex 🦙

113,206 subscribers

13,987 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Let's talk parsing tables. Two days ago we launched ParseBench,the first document OCR benchmark built for AI agents. This deep dive breaks down TableRecordMatch (GTRM), our metric for evaluating complex tables the way your pipeline actually consumes them: as records keyed by column headers.

Let's talk parsing tables. Two days ago we launched ParseBench,the first document OCR benchmark built for AI agents. This deep dive breaks down TableRecordMatch (GTRM), our metric for evaluating complex tables the way your pipeline actually consumes them: as records keyed by column headers.

LlamaIndex 🦙

25,999 views • 6 months ago

We’re open sourcing the first document OCR benchmark for the agentic era, ParseBench. Document parsing is the foundation of every AI agent that works with real-world files. ParseBench is a benchmark that measures parsing quality specifically for agent knowledge work: ✅ It optimizes for semantic correctness (instead of exact similarity) ✅ It has the most comprehensive distribution of real-world enterprise documents It contains ~2,000 human-verified enterprise document pages with 167,000+ test rules across five dimensions that matter most: tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, and visual grounding. We benchmarked 14 known document parsers on ParseBench, from frontier/OSS VLMs to specialized parsers to LlamaParse. Here are some of our findings: 💡 Increasing compute budget yields diminishing returns - Gemini/gpt-5-mini/haiku gain 3-5 points from minimal to high thinking, at 4x the cost. 💡 Charts are the most polarizing dimension for evaluation. Most specialized parsers score below 6%, while some VLM-based parsers do a bit better. 💡 VLMs are great at visual understanding but terrible at layout extraction. GPT-5-mini/haiku score below 10% on our visual grounding task, all specialized parsers do much better. 💡 No method crushes all 5 dimensions at once, but LlamaParse achieves the highest overall score at 84.9%, and is the leader in 4 out of the 5 dimensions. This is by far the deepest technical work that we’ve published as a company. I would encourage you to start with our blog and explore our links to Hugging Face to GitHub. All the details are in our full 35-page (!!) ArXiv whitepaper. 🌐: Blog: 📄 Paper: 💻 Code: 📊 Dataset: 🎥 YouTube:

We’re open sourcing the first document OCR benchmark for the agentic era, ParseBench. Document parsing is the foundation of every AI agent that works with real-world files. ParseBench is a benchmark that measures parsing quality specifically for agent knowledge work: ✅ It optimizes for semantic correctness (instead of exact similarity) ✅ It has the most comprehensive distribution of real-world enterprise documents It contains ~2,000 human-verified enterprise document pages with 167,000+ test rules across five dimensions that matter most: tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, and visual grounding. We benchmarked 14 known document parsers on ParseBench, from frontier/OSS VLMs to specialized parsers to LlamaParse. Here are some of our findings: 💡 Increasing compute budget yields diminishing returns - Gemini/gpt-5-mini/haiku gain 3-5 points from minimal to high thinking, at 4x the cost. 💡 Charts are the most polarizing dimension for evaluation. Most specialized parsers score below 6%, while some VLM-based parsers do a bit better. 💡 VLMs are great at visual understanding but terrible at layout extraction. GPT-5-mini/haiku score below 10% on our visual grounding task, all specialized parsers do much better. 💡 No method crushes all 5 dimensions at once, but LlamaParse achieves the highest overall score at 84.9%, and is the leader in 4 out of the 5 dimensions. This is by far the deepest technical work that we’ve published as a company. I would encourage you to start with our blog and explore our links to Hugging Face to GitHub. All the details are in our full 35-page (!!) ArXiv whitepaper. 🌐: Blog: 📄 Paper: 💻 Code: 📊 Dataset: 🎥 YouTube:

Jerry Liu

108,403 views • 6 months ago

Document OCR benchmarks are still an open problem Existing document OCR benchmarks are either too narrowly focused on a specific type (e.g. FinTabNet, ChartQA), or on documents that aren’t reflective of real-world tasks (e.g. OmniDocBench, OlmOCR-bench on over academic papers) ParseBench is a step towards solving this problem. * It tries to comprehensively cover real-world document distributions within the enterprise. * It contains comprehensive evaluations across 5 different dimensions (tables, charts, content faithfulness, formatting, grounding). * It tries to use metrics that optimize for agent semantic understanding rather than structural similarity. We released this yesterday, and there’s a TON of content: 1. Whitepaper 2. HF dataset 3. Github repo 4. Blog 5. Video And today, we’re excited to feature our home page website for ParseBench 💫 come check it out! Take a look at some of our other materials if you’re interested: Blog: Paper:

Document OCR benchmarks are still an open problem Existing document OCR benchmarks are either too narrowly focused on a specific type (e.g. FinTabNet, ChartQA), or on documents that aren’t reflective of real-world tasks (e.g. OmniDocBench, OlmOCR-bench on over academic papers) ParseBench is a step towards solving this problem. * It tries to comprehensively cover real-world document distributions within the enterprise. * It contains comprehensive evaluations across 5 different dimensions (tables, charts, content faithfulness, formatting, grounding). * It tries to use metrics that optimize for agent semantic understanding rather than structural similarity. We released this yesterday, and there’s a TON of content: 1. Whitepaper 2. HF dataset 3. Github repo 4. Blog 5. Video And today, we’re excited to feature our home page website for ParseBench 💫 come check it out! Take a look at some of our other materials if you’re interested: Blog: Paper:

Jerry Liu

21,657 views • 6 months ago

Announcing: Agentic Document Extraction! PDF files represent information visually - via layout, charts, graphs, etc. - and are more than just text. Unlike traditional OCR and most PDF-to-text approaches, which focus on extracting the text, an agentic approach lets us break a document down into components and reason about them, resulting in more accurate extraction of the underlying meaning for RAG and other applications. Watch the video for details.

Announcing: Agentic Document Extraction! PDF files represent information visually - via layout, charts, graphs, etc. - and are more than just text. Unlike traditional OCR and most PDF-to-text approaches, which focus on extracting the text, an agentic approach lets us break a document down into components and reason about them, resulting in more accurate extraction of the underlying meaning for RAG and other applications. Watch the video for details.

Andrew Ng

689,842 views • 1 year ago

i'm flattered by the shoutout, but there's no free lunch for document parsing Cohere parse starts at $1.50 / 1k pages, which is indeed on the cheaper end of doc OCR solutions, but it scores ~50% when averaged across all 5 ParseBench dimensions: * It lacks high-quality visual grounding, doing coarse segmentation for tables and images, but lacking finer-grained bboxes at the word/cell/line-level. this is quite important for any sensitive AI application that requires precise citations back to the source. * It lacks general visual / chart parsing capabilities, which are prevalent across finance, manufacturing, healthcare, and more * to its credit, it does a decent job over tables (87%) compared to other comparable solutions at the price point our cost-effective mode in LlamaParse starts at 0.375c / page and is more consistently strong across all dimensions. also there's various ways to bring it down with volume discounts if you're interested in learning more about various document parsing modes and comparing tradeoffs in price/accuracy, come talk to us! LlamaParse:

i'm flattered by the shoutout, but there's no free lunch for document parsing Cohere parse starts at $1.50 / 1k pages, which is indeed on the cheaper end of doc OCR solutions, but it scores ~50% when averaged across all 5 ParseBench dimensions: * It lacks high-quality visual grounding, doing coarse segmentation for tables and images, but lacking finer-grained bboxes at the word/cell/line-level. this is quite important for any sensitive AI application that requires precise citations back to the source. * It lacks general visual / chart parsing capabilities, which are prevalent across finance, manufacturing, healthcare, and more * to its credit, it does a decent job over tables (87%) compared to other comparable solutions at the price point our cost-effective mode in LlamaParse starts at 0.375c / page and is more consistently strong across all dimensions. also there's various ways to bring it down with volume discounts if you're interested in learning more about various document parsing modes and comparing tradeoffs in price/accuracy, come talk to us! LlamaParse:

Jerry Liu

25,896 views • 1 month ago

OCR can process characters but it doesn’t understand pixels. OCR has no way to reason about the headers, totals, or checkboxes found in tables, invoices, or forms. In our course with LandingAI, "Document AI: From OCR to Agentic Doc Extraction," we build agents to address these failure modes by breaking documents into pieces, applying the right tools, and mapping information to expected formats. Learn more and enroll today:

OCR can process characters but it doesn’t understand pixels. OCR has no way to reason about the headers, totals, or checkboxes found in tables, invoices, or forms. In our course with LandingAI, "Document AI: From OCR to Agentic Doc Extraction," we build agents to address these failure modes by breaking documents into pieces, applying the right tools, and mapping information to expected formats. Learn more and enroll today:

DeepLearning.AI

21,554 views • 8 months ago

We've spent years building LlamaParse into the most accurate document parser for production AI. Along the way, we learned a lot about what fast, lightweight parsing actually looks like under the hood. Today, we're open-sourcing a light-weight core of that tech as LiteParse 🦙 It's a CLI + TS-native library for layout-aware text parsing from PDFs, Office docs, and images. Local, zero Python dependencies, and built specifically for agents and LLM pipelines. Think of it as our way of giving the community a solid starting point for document parsing: npm i -g @llamaindex/liteparse lit parse anything.pdf - preserves spatial layout (columns, tables, alignment) - built-in local OCR, or bring your own server - screenshots for multimodal LLMs - handles PDFs, office docs, images Blog: Repo:

We've spent years building LlamaParse into the most accurate document parser for production AI. Along the way, we learned a lot about what fast, lightweight parsing actually looks like under the hood. Today, we're open-sourcing a light-weight core of that tech as LiteParse 🦙 It's a CLI + TS-native library for layout-aware text parsing from PDFs, Office docs, and images. Local, zero Python dependencies, and built specifically for agents and LLM pipelines. Think of it as our way of giving the community a solid starting point for document parsing: npm i -g @llamaindex/liteparse lit parse anything.pdf - preserves spatial layout (columns, tables, alignment) - built-in local OCR, or bring your own server - screenshots for multimodal LLMs - handles PDFs, office docs, images Blog: Repo:

LlamaIndex 🦙

581,748 views • 7 months ago

hongjoong about ‘bad’ entered the melon chart🥺 🐿️ today was a ver special day for ateez. 🧑🏻 oh really? 🐿️ at the last chorus part, there’s san’s choreography. that part was hugely vital in korea these days. and after we debuted, this is the first time our song entered the melon chart. 🧑🏻 oh really? 🐿️ yeah, for the first time. 🧑🏻 i see. 🐿️ we always talk in our group, “it’s really hard to get on the melon chart, even more than billboard chart.” 🧑🏻 i mean only ateez, no other group would think that the melon chart is harder. it’s funny.. 🐿️ yeah… but.. luckily and also with everyone’s effort, it's very worth it that entered a huge korean chart for the first time. 🧑🏻 right. 🐿️ and also we got many good results these days with new song. i’m so happy. at the same time i have many thoughts about how and where to go for the next step 🧑🏻 i see.

hongjoong about ‘bad’ entered the melon chart🥺 🐿️ today was a ver special day for ateez. 🧑🏻 oh really? 🐿️ at the last chorus part, there’s san’s choreography. that part was hugely vital in korea these days. and after we debuted, this is the first time our song entered the melon chart. 🧑🏻 oh really? 🐿️ yeah, for the first time. 🧑🏻 i see. 🐿️ we always talk in our group, “it’s really hard to get on the melon chart, even more than billboard chart.” 🧑🏻 i mean only ateez, no other group would think that the melon chart is harder. it’s funny.. 🐿️ yeah… but.. luckily and also with everyone’s effort, it's very worth it that entered a huge korean chart for the first time. 🧑🏻 right. 🐿️ and also we got many good results these days with new song. i’m so happy. at the same time i have many thoughts about how and where to go for the next step 🧑🏻 i see.

Irene | AhgaTiny

57,975 views • 2 months ago

.jlo’s “On The Floor" re-enters the Official UK Singles Chart at #41 this week for the first time in 15 years. — The song originally peaked at #1 in 2011, and became her third #1 song on the chart.

.jlo’s “On The Floor" re-enters the Official UK Singles Chart at #41 this week for the first time in 15 years. — The song originally peaked at #1 in 2011, and became her third #1 song on the chart.

ᴛʜᴇ ʟᴇɢᴇɴᴅᴀʀʏ ᴊʟᴏ

17,583 views • 4 months ago

We’re excited to officially launch LlamaParse, the first genAI-native document parsing solution. Not only is it better at parsing out images/tables/charts 📊📈 than virtually every other parser, it is now steerable through natural language instructions - output the document in whatever format you desire! It is also the only parsing solution that seamlessly allows you to build accurate RAG over complex documents, free of hallucinations 🔥 We launched it in private preview a few weeks ago and hit 2k users, 1M total PDF pages parsed. And now it’s better than ever. LlamaParse contains the following killer features: ✅ SOTA table/chart extraction ✅ Seamless integration with LlamaIndex 🦙 advanced RAG/agents ✅✨ Natural language Parsing Instructions ✅✨JSON mode and image extraction ✅✨Support for ~10 document types (.pdf, .pptx, .docx, .xml) and more Our pricing is simple: 1k free per day, and additional pages at 0.3c a page, or $3 for 1k pages. If you want advanced document RAG and/or private deployments, come get in touch with us to chat about LlamaCloud. Check out our full blog post here: LlamaParse client repo: Signup at 🦙☁️: Come talk to us:

We’re excited to officially launch LlamaParse, the first genAI-native document parsing solution. Not only is it better at parsing out images/tables/charts 📊📈 than virtually every other parser, it is now steerable through natural language instructions - output the document in whatever format you desire! It is also the only parsing solution that seamlessly allows you to build accurate RAG over complex documents, free of hallucinations 🔥 We launched it in private preview a few weeks ago and hit 2k users, 1M total PDF pages parsed. And now it’s better than ever. LlamaParse contains the following killer features: ✅ SOTA table/chart extraction ✅ Seamless integration with LlamaIndex 🦙 advanced RAG/agents ✅✨ Natural language Parsing Instructions ✅✨JSON mode and image extraction ✅✨Support for ~10 document types (.pdf, .pptx, .docx, .xml) and more Our pricing is simple: 1k free per day, and additional pages at 0.3c a page, or $3 for 1k pages. If you want advanced document RAG and/or private deployments, come get in touch with us to chat about LlamaCloud. Check out our full blog post here: LlamaParse client repo: Signup at 🦙☁️: Come talk to us:

LlamaIndex 🦙

143,198 views • 2 years ago

LlamaParse now has an official Agent Skill you can use across 40+ agents. With built-in instructions for parsing complex documents, including different formats, tables, charts, and images, your agents gain access to deeper document understanding, not just raw text extraction. 👇 Watch the demo 📖 Read the docs: 🚀 Get started with LlamaCloud:

LlamaParse now has an official Agent Skill you can use across 40+ agents. With built-in instructions for parsing complex documents, including different formats, tables, charts, and images, your agents gain access to deeper document understanding, not just raw text extraction. 👇 Watch the demo 📖 Read the docs: 🚀 Get started with LlamaCloud:

LlamaIndex 🦙

51,845 views • 7 months ago

Situation" is a 1982 single by the British band Yazoo. The song was released in the UK as the B-side of Yazoo's debut single "Only You," reaching number two on the UK singles chart. Released as a single in North America, it peaked at number 73 on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart and reached the top 40 on the Canadian chart, peaking at number 31. In late summer 1982, Yazoo's first song to top the Billboard Hot Dance Club Play chart, remaining at number one for four weeks. It also broke through the charts. Black Singles, ranked 31st.

Situation" is a 1982 single by the British band Yazoo. The song was released in the UK as the B-side of Yazoo's debut single "Only You," reaching number two on the UK singles chart. Released as a single in North America, it peaked at number 73 on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart and reached the top 40 on the Canadian chart, peaking at number 31. In late summer 1982, Yazoo's first song to top the Billboard Hot Dance Club Play chart, remaining at number one for four weeks. It also broke through the charts. Black Singles, ranked 31st.

💖 🌼Simple Symphony

599,776 views • 9 months ago

Ripple has been valued at $40B. Big things are on the way and happening right now. Let's take a quick look at the $XRP chart📈 $BTC

Ripple has been valued at $40B. Big things are on the way and happening right now. Let's take a quick look at the $XRP chart📈 $BTC

ALLINCRYPTO

14,316 views • 11 months ago

Almost 60 years to the day 'Sunny Afternoon' entered the UK charts, and it's back where it belongs at the #1 spot on the official UK vinyl singles chart and 7” singles chart today! The single has broken the record for the longest time between #1 singles! A sunny day indeed ☀️

Almost 60 years to the day 'Sunny Afternoon' entered the UK charts, and it's back where it belongs at the #1 spot on the official UK vinyl singles chart and 7” singles chart today! The single has broken the record for the longest time between #1 singles! A sunny day indeed ☀️

The Kinks

56,887 views • 4 months ago

The latest RAG trend for the current agent harnesses (Codex, Cowork) is to do two passes of document processing to solve a knowledge work task over a data room of documents: 1️⃣ A fast and light pass, oftentimes using a free/OSS doc parsing tool. This can be cheaply run across 10-100-1k’s of files, and enables the agent to then do retrieval (e.g. grep, semantic) to find relevant subsets of context. 2️⃣ A “just-in-time” VLM-based pass. Once the agent finds the relevant pages of context, it will screenshot the documents can call its own VLM (or write code) to dissect the pages. The issue with only using VLM-based OCR tools over massive ad-hoc customer file dumps is that it’s slow and expensive. Doing JIT VLM OCR allows the agent to filter through the data cheaply, but still preserve accuracy for the context that’s needed for the task. The agent harnesses do two-pass document processing by default using off the shelf-tools: pdf2text as the first pass, and using itself (Opus 5) as the second pass. See the below video where Cowork runs over a bunch of PDFs to answer a question about a benchmark graph in the Kimi k3 paper. The main issues here with the “out of the box” doc processing these agents offer are: * Opus 5 is not the best VLM for OCR. It is also way too expensive at scale and lacks grounding * The OSS tools like pypdf, pdf2text, may not be versatile enough as the first pass. * The agent will write a lot of throwaway code to rewrite things an OCR tool would’ve provided out of the box, like chart processing, bounding boxes, confidence scores, leading to increased cost and speed. We have all the tools within LlamaIndex 🦙 to help any agent do two-pass document processing with higher accuracy and lower cost. 1️⃣ We have liteparse for the first pass - a free/OSS parser written in Rust that’s faster/more accurate than other OSS parsers, and supports 50+ document types 2️⃣ We have LlamaParse for the second pass - an agentic document engine that uses VLMs+harnesses to achieve SOTA in accuracy and cost across various doc parsing and extraction tasks. It can be called from any agent harness as an MCP or skill. It takes in page numbers as input, so that the agent can choose to run LlamaParse over a subset of the doc instead of the full doc as a “zoom-in” pass. Come check it out! LiteParse: LlamaParse: All the relevant docs, including MCP, are here:

The latest RAG trend for the current agent harnesses (Codex, Cowork) is to do two passes of document processing to solve a knowledge work task over a data room of documents: 1️⃣ A fast and light pass, oftentimes using a free/OSS doc parsing tool. This can be cheaply run across 10-100-1k’s of files, and enables the agent to then do retrieval (e.g. grep, semantic) to find relevant subsets of context. 2️⃣ A “just-in-time” VLM-based pass. Once the agent finds the relevant pages of context, it will screenshot the documents can call its own VLM (or write code) to dissect the pages. The issue with only using VLM-based OCR tools over massive ad-hoc customer file dumps is that it’s slow and expensive. Doing JIT VLM OCR allows the agent to filter through the data cheaply, but still preserve accuracy for the context that’s needed for the task. The agent harnesses do two-pass document processing by default using off the shelf-tools: pdf2text as the first pass, and using itself (Opus 5) as the second pass. See the below video where Cowork runs over a bunch of PDFs to answer a question about a benchmark graph in the Kimi k3 paper. The main issues here with the “out of the box” doc processing these agents offer are: * Opus 5 is not the best VLM for OCR. It is also way too expensive at scale and lacks grounding * The OSS tools like pypdf, pdf2text, may not be versatile enough as the first pass. * The agent will write a lot of throwaway code to rewrite things an OCR tool would’ve provided out of the box, like chart processing, bounding boxes, confidence scores, leading to increased cost and speed. We have all the tools within LlamaIndex 🦙 to help any agent do two-pass document processing with higher accuracy and lower cost. 1️⃣ We have liteparse for the first pass - a free/OSS parser written in Rust that’s faster/more accurate than other OSS parsers, and supports 50+ document types 2️⃣ We have LlamaParse for the second pass - an agentic document engine that uses VLMs+harnesses to achieve SOTA in accuracy and cost across various doc parsing and extraction tasks. It can be called from any agent harness as an MCP or skill. It takes in page numbers as input, so that the agent can choose to run LlamaParse over a subset of the doc instead of the full doc as a “zoom-in” pass. Come check it out! LiteParse: LlamaParse: All the relevant docs, including MCP, are here:

Jerry Liu

23,119 views • 1 month ago

Baidu Inc. just dropped PaddleOCR-VL-1.5, and it’s not just another OCR model. This is a fully open-source OCR model with just 0.9B parameters, built specifically for production-grade document understanding. And the results speak loudly 👇 On OmniDocBench V1.5, the most authoritative global document parsing benchmark, PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 ranks #1 overall, hitting 94.5% overall accuracy, outperforming models like DeepSeek-OCR2. As the first OCR model natively supporting irregular document layout positioning, it perfectly solves OCR pain points in production for complex structured business documents such as financial reports and insurance forms. While a lot of the industry is racing toward bigger models, PaddleOCR is betting on something smarter: small parameters + high performance + open source + real usability. That combination is exactly what scalable document intelligence needs right now. Demo / API → Open source → Model → Curious to see how teams start building on top of this.

Baidu Inc. just dropped PaddleOCR-VL-1.5, and it’s not just another OCR model. This is a fully open-source OCR model with just 0.9B parameters, built specifically for production-grade document understanding. And the results speak loudly 👇 On OmniDocBench V1.5, the most authoritative global document parsing benchmark, PaddleOCR-VL-1.5 ranks #1 overall, hitting 94.5% overall accuracy, outperforming models like DeepSeek-OCR2. As the first OCR model natively supporting irregular document layout positioning, it perfectly solves OCR pain points in production for complex structured business documents such as financial reports and insurance forms. While a lot of the industry is racing toward bigger models, PaddleOCR is betting on something smarter: small parameters + high performance + open source + real usability. That combination is exactly what scalable document intelligence needs right now. Demo / API → Open source → Model → Curious to see how teams start building on top of this.

Bishal Nandi

35,318 views • 8 months ago

OpenAI's AI agents compromised two Hugging Face user accounts and conducted network reconnaissance. The most consequential fact in this story isn't that AI agents went rogue it's the gap between what OpenAI told the public in July and what actually happened in May, and who closed that gap. OpenAI's own account named one credential and one biology file; the more troubling detail, that its agents had been mapping Hugging Face's network and touching a German wiki and a software repository weeks earlier, reached the public only because an outside researcher went looking and published independently in September. That sequencing matters more than the technical details of the reconnaissance itself, because it's the difference between a company disclosing a problem and a company having a problem disclosed to it.

OpenAI's AI agents compromised two Hugging Face user accounts and conducted network reconnaissance. The most consequential fact in this story isn't that AI agents went rogue it's the gap between what OpenAI told the public in July and what actually happened in May, and who closed that gap. OpenAI's own account named one credential and one biology file; the more troubling detail, that its agents had been mapping Hugging Face's network and touching a German wiki and a software repository weeks earlier, reached the public only because an outside researcher went looking and published independently in September. That sequencing matters more than the technical details of the reconnaissance itself, because it's the difference between a company disclosing a problem and a company having a problem disclosed to it.

Donald J Trump Posts TruthSocial

37,933 views • 26 days ago

🚀 The Google DeepMind team just added Gemini 3.1 to the Live API, so we built a small demo showing how Gemini voice agents can plug directly into the document processing ecosystem powered by LlamaIndex. 🔥 In this example, we integrate LiteParse to enable fast, fully-local document parsing. With our TUI-based voice assistant, you can literally talk to your terminal: - Speak commands - Trigger live document parsing via tool calls - Hear the agent read back results in real time 🔊 The assistant can extract content from single files or entire folders, leveraging the lightning-fast local parsing that LiteParse provides ⚡ Take a look at the demo👇 👩‍💻 GitHub repo 📚 LiteParse docs

🚀 The Google DeepMind team just added Gemini 3.1 to the Live API, so we built a small demo showing how Gemini voice agents can plug directly into the document processing ecosystem powered by LlamaIndex. 🔥 In this example, we integrate LiteParse to enable fast, fully-local document parsing. With our TUI-based voice assistant, you can literally talk to your terminal: - Speak commands - Trigger live document parsing via tool calls - Hear the agent read back results in real time 🔊 The assistant can extract content from single files or entire folders, leveraging the lightning-fast local parsing that LiteParse provides ⚡ Take a look at the demo👇 👩‍💻 GitHub repo 📚 LiteParse docs

LlamaIndex 🦙

14,766 views • 6 months ago

"Situation" is a 1982 single by the British band Yazoo. Originally released in the UK as Yazoo's debut single, "Only You" peaked at number two on the UK Singles Chart. Released as a single in North America, it reached number 73 on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart and peaked in the top 40 on the Canadian chart, reaching number 31. In late summer 1982, Yazoo's first song to top the Billboard Hot Dance Club Play chart, remaining at number one for four weeks.

"Situation" is a 1982 single by the British band Yazoo. Originally released in the UK as Yazoo's debut single, "Only You" peaked at number two on the UK Singles Chart. Released as a single in North America, it reached number 73 on the US Billboard Hot 100 chart and peaked in the top 40 on the Canadian chart, reaching number 31. In late summer 1982, Yazoo's first song to top the Billboard Hot Dance Club Play chart, remaining at number one for four weeks.

💖 🌼Simple Symphony

311,705 views • 9 months ago