Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

We’re excited to officially launch LlamaParse, the first genAI-native document parsing solution. Not only is it better at parsing out images/tables/charts 📊📈 than virtually every other parser, it is now steerable through natural language instructions - output the document in whatever format you desire! It is also the only...

llama_index's profile picture

LlamaIndex 🦙

120,719 subscribers

143,198 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологии
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Manish Sinha
Manish Sinha2 лет назад

Charts ( bar graph) and images ( of math formulae’s) don’t work still. Text and tables work well ( especially tables accuracy and markdown format). Will test more elaborately later.

Фото профиля DataStax
DataStax2 лет назад

Congrats @llama_index team! LlamaParse is 🔥🔥🔥

Фото профиля matthew muller
matthew muller2 лет назад

Is there a data privacy statement for llamacloud? I cant seem to find that... thx!

Фото профиля Duc Nguyen Huu
Duc Nguyen Huu2 лет назад

I have a question on information security when using llama-parse. For example, I have pdf files and I want to use llama-parse for parsing. My concern is whether utilizing llama-parse through API access poses any potential risks of information leakage.

Фото профиля Andrew Batutin ☸️/acc
Andrew Batutin ☸️/acc2 лет назад

Is this price on top of Claude 3 pricing? Or it’s for all including llm calls?

Фото профиля LlamaIndex 🦙
LlamaIndex 🦙2 лет назад

That's the full price!

Фото профиля nohrt
nohrt2 лет назад

Great stuff!! good job :) Now if you could fix the issue of auto rotating pages i would be able to use llama parse :P

Фото профиля RM
RM2 лет назад

Here's my article. Please upvote!

Фото профиля Art Intelligence
Art Intelligence2 лет назад

It doesn’t seem to work well with chinese documents and papers. It is also lacking the feature of translating text.

Фото профиля LLL
LLL2 лет назад

mathpix is excellent at parsing academic pdfs, did you have a comparison with them when you mentioned "better virtually every other parsers"?

Похожие видео

An underrated issue with document parsing for RAG / agent use cases is dealing with multi-page tables - sometimes a big table spills over into multiple pages. This breaks chunking algorithms that generally operate at the page-level or smaller, and causes LLMs to lose the full view of the data. With LlamaParse Continuous Mode (in beta), you can now parse a document with multi-page tables and join them into a single table! This means you can now: 💡 Do contiguous chunking for RAG use cases OR 💡 Parse the table for text-to-SQL Check out our blog post highlighting this feature. Huge shoutout to Pierre-Loic Doulcet and Sacha Bron : Signup here: It's in beta, let us know your feedback!
2:22

An underrated issue with document parsing for RAG / agent use cases is dealing with multi-page tables - sometimes a big table spills over into multiple pages. This breaks chunking algorithms that generally operate at the page-level or smaller, and causes LLMs to lose the full view of the data. With LlamaParse Continuous Mode (in beta), you can now parse a document with multi-page tables and join them into a single table! This means you can now: 💡 Do contiguous chunking for RAG use cases OR 💡 Parse the table for text-to-SQL Check out our blog post highlighting this feature. Huge shoutout to Pierre-Loic Doulcet and Sacha Bron : Signup here: It's in beta, let us know your feedback!

Jerry Liu

24,245 просмотров • 1 год назад

Astra is awesome, but if you're using it specifically to parse and extract a massive volume of documents, you will break the bank (10c+ per page on parsing and extraction!) We've added a native LlamaParse connector to ChatGPT that gives the model access to high-quality document OCR and extraction at the pareto frontier of accuracy and cost. It contains native access to our parse and extract endpoints. Upload your most complex documents, and you can do the following: * digitalize it into extremely accurate context for any QA task * perform large-scale extraction from a set of documents with accurate grounding and citations Offload the higher-level reasoning to Astra, leave specialized doc parsing and extraction to us. ChatGPT plugin: Come sign up here:
0:31

Astra is awesome, but if you're using it specifically to parse and extract a massive volume of documents, you will break the bank (10c+ per page on parsing and extraction!) We've added a native LlamaParse connector to ChatGPT that gives the model access to high-quality document OCR and extraction at the pareto frontier of accuracy and cost. It contains native access to our parse and extract endpoints. Upload your most complex documents, and you can do the following: * digitalize it into extremely accurate context for any QA task * perform large-scale extraction from a set of documents with accurate grounding and citations Offload the higher-level reasoning to Astra, leave specialized doc parsing and extraction to us. ChatGPT plugin: Come sign up here:

Jerry Liu

11,083 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Introducing LlamaCloud 🦙🌤️ Today we’re thrilled to introduce LlamaCloud, a managed service designed to bring production-grade data for your LLM and RAG app. Spend less time data wrangling and more time on application logic. Launching with the following components: 1️⃣ LlamaParse 📑: a proprietary parser designed to be really really good at complex documents with embedded tables. Build advanced RAG over semi-structured PDFs, and ask questions that simply aren’t possible with the naive stack. Available publicly day 1 🔥 2️⃣ Managed Ingestion/Retrieval API ⚙️: An API letting you easily ingest/retrieve data from data sources. Opening up in private beta to select enterprises. We’re excited to be joined by launch users, partners, and collaborators: Mendable @DataStax MongoDB Qdrant NVIDIA + some awesome hackathon projects at the LlamaIndex 🦙 hackathon Check out our FULL blog post on LlamaCloud and LlamaParse: LlamaParse Client Repo: Signup for a LlamaCloud account to use LlamaParse: Interested in the broader LlamaCloud offering? Come talk to us: Also we have a slick new website 🌐:
2:59

Introducing LlamaCloud 🦙🌤️ Today we’re thrilled to introduce LlamaCloud, a managed service designed to bring production-grade data for your LLM and RAG app. Spend less time data wrangling and more time on application logic. Launching with the following components: 1️⃣ LlamaParse 📑: a proprietary parser designed to be really really good at complex documents with embedded tables. Build advanced RAG over semi-structured PDFs, and ask questions that simply aren’t possible with the naive stack. Available publicly day 1 🔥 2️⃣ Managed Ingestion/Retrieval API ⚙️: An API letting you easily ingest/retrieve data from data sources. Opening up in private beta to select enterprises. We’re excited to be joined by launch users, partners, and collaborators: Mendable @DataStax MongoDB Qdrant NVIDIA + some awesome hackathon projects at the LlamaIndex 🦙 hackathon Check out our FULL blog post on LlamaCloud and LlamaParse: LlamaParse Client Repo: Signup for a LlamaCloud account to use LlamaParse: Interested in the broader LlamaCloud offering? Come talk to us: Also we have a slick new website 🌐:

LlamaIndex 🦙

141,289 просмотров • 2 лет назад

LiteParse Samples 📄🧑‍🏫 LiteParse is our free and fast document parser that can parse text with bounding boxes from any document. I’ve created a new repository that contains some demos on how you can make use of its outputs! ✅ Comparison against PyPDF and PyMuPDF ✅ Visual Citations: search for any keyword and see joined bounding boxes pop up in the source images It should be a default tool to help AI agents OCR any document type (supports PDF, Word, Powerpoint + dozens of other formats), before heavier-weight VLM-based document parsing solutions (like our own LlamaParse). LiteParse Samples repo: LiteParse:
0:33

LiteParse Samples 📄🧑‍🏫 LiteParse is our free and fast document parser that can parse text with bounding boxes from any document. I’ve created a new repository that contains some demos on how you can make use of its outputs! ✅ Comparison against PyPDF and PyMuPDF ✅ Visual Citations: search for any keyword and see joined bounding boxes pop up in the source images It should be a default tool to help AI agents OCR any document type (supports PDF, Word, Powerpoint + dozens of other formats), before heavier-weight VLM-based document parsing solutions (like our own LlamaParse). LiteParse Samples repo: LiteParse:

Jerry Liu

13,196 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

i'm flattered by the shoutout, but there's no free lunch for document parsing Cohere parse starts at $1.50 / 1k pages, which is indeed on the cheaper end of doc OCR solutions, but it scores ~50% when averaged across all 5 ParseBench dimensions: * It lacks high-quality visual grounding, doing coarse segmentation for tables and images, but lacking finer-grained bboxes at the word/cell/line-level. this is quite important for any sensitive AI application that requires precise citations back to the source. * It lacks general visual / chart parsing capabilities, which are prevalent across finance, manufacturing, healthcare, and more * to its credit, it does a decent job over tables (87%) compared to other comparable solutions at the price point our cost-effective mode in LlamaParse starts at 0.375c / page and is more consistently strong across all dimensions. also there's various ways to bring it down with volume discounts if you're interested in learning more about various document parsing modes and comparing tradeoffs in price/accuracy, come talk to us! LlamaParse:
0:26

i'm flattered by the shoutout, but there's no free lunch for document parsing Cohere parse starts at $1.50 / 1k pages, which is indeed on the cheaper end of doc OCR solutions, but it scores ~50% when averaged across all 5 ParseBench dimensions: * It lacks high-quality visual grounding, doing coarse segmentation for tables and images, but lacking finer-grained bboxes at the word/cell/line-level. this is quite important for any sensitive AI application that requires precise citations back to the source. * It lacks general visual / chart parsing capabilities, which are prevalent across finance, manufacturing, healthcare, and more * to its credit, it does a decent job over tables (87%) compared to other comparable solutions at the price point our cost-effective mode in LlamaParse starts at 0.375c / page and is more consistently strong across all dimensions. also there's various ways to bring it down with volume discounts if you're interested in learning more about various document parsing modes and comparing tradeoffs in price/accuracy, come talk to us! LlamaParse:

Jerry Liu

25,896 просмотров • 28 дней назад

Introducing LiteParse - the best model-free document parsing tool for AI agents 💫 ✅ It’s completely open-source and free. ✅ No GPU required, will process ~500 pages in 2 seconds on commodity hardware ✅ More accurate than PyPDF, PyMuPDF, Markdown. Also way more readable - see below for how we parse tables!! ✅ Supports 50+ file formats, from PDFs to Office docs to images ✅ Is designed to plug and play with Claude Code, OpenClaw, and any other AI agent with a one-line skills install. Supports native screenshotting capabilities. We spent years building up LlamaParse by orchestrating state-of-the-art VLMs over the most complex documents. Along the way we realized that you could get quite far on most docs through fast and cheap text parsing. Take a look at the video below. For really complex tables within PDFs, we output them in a spatial grid that’s both AI and human-interpretable. Any other free/light parser light PyPDF will destroy the representation of this table and output a sequential list. This is not a replacement for a VLM-based OCR tool (it requires 0 GPUs and doesn’t use models), but it is shocking how good it is to parse most documents. Huge shoutout to Logan Markewich and Clelia Bertelli (🦀/acc) for all the work here. Come check it out: Repo:
0:31

Introducing LiteParse - the best model-free document parsing tool for AI agents 💫 ✅ It’s completely open-source and free. ✅ No GPU required, will process ~500 pages in 2 seconds on commodity hardware ✅ More accurate than PyPDF, PyMuPDF, Markdown. Also way more readable - see below for how we parse tables!! ✅ Supports 50+ file formats, from PDFs to Office docs to images ✅ Is designed to plug and play with Claude Code, OpenClaw, and any other AI agent with a one-line skills install. Supports native screenshotting capabilities. We spent years building up LlamaParse by orchestrating state-of-the-art VLMs over the most complex documents. Along the way we realized that you could get quite far on most docs through fast and cheap text parsing. Take a look at the video below. For really complex tables within PDFs, we output them in a spatial grid that’s both AI and human-interpretable. Any other free/light parser light PyPDF will destroy the representation of this table and output a sequential list. This is not a replacement for a VLM-based OCR tool (it requires 0 GPUs and doesn’t use models), but it is shocking how good it is to parse most documents. Huge shoutout to Logan Markewich and Clelia Bertelli (🦀/acc) for all the work here. Come check it out: Repo:

Jerry Liu

257,589 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

Introducing DocJev - a lightning-fast OSS library for document classification and splitting with jev ⚡️ Give a document alongside some natural language category rules. Jev will predict the document category (classify) or the boundaries between sub-documents (split). It is 6x faster than gpt-5.6-luna with equivalent accuracy. You can choose between different OCR backends: liteparse: the fastest/most accurate free+OSS text parser out there. Perfect for digitalized documents. The speedups vs. luna above are inclusive of liteparse times. LlamaParse: the most advanced VLM-based solution for complex docs. Using this will of course add latency on document preprocessing. But it’s a good option if you want to cache the digitalized representations of documents for a variety of downstream tasks. Check it out: If you want to dive deeper into liteparse or LlamaParse check the links below: liteparse: LlamaParse:
0:24

Introducing DocJev - a lightning-fast OSS library for document classification and splitting with jev ⚡️ Give a document alongside some natural language category rules. Jev will predict the document category (classify) or the boundaries between sub-documents (split). It is 6x faster than gpt-5.6-luna with equivalent accuracy. You can choose between different OCR backends: liteparse: the fastest/most accurate free+OSS text parser out there. Perfect for digitalized documents. The speedups vs. luna above are inclusive of liteparse times. LlamaParse: the most advanced VLM-based solution for complex docs. Using this will of course add latency on document preprocessing. But it’s a good option if you want to cache the digitalized representations of documents for a variety of downstream tasks. Check it out: If you want to dive deeper into liteparse or LlamaParse check the links below: liteparse: LlamaParse:

Jerry Liu

217,233 просмотров • 22 дней назад

We built an AI agent that lets you vibe-code document extraction - high accuracy and citations over the most complex documents. Our latest release lets you upload documents as context. All you then have to do is describe what you want extracted in natural language. 💡 Our agent will then read the document with file tools to infer the right schema, validation rules, and other pre/postprocessing logic. ✅ It will give you back a workflow that can extract over thousands/millions of documents at scale. You can still of course review and edit every output before approving. Stop handling paperwork manually; just upload files, describe your task, and let our agent handle the rest. Our vision for LlamaAgents is to provide the most advanced and easy-to-use way for you to orchestrate document work. Walkthrough: Check it out: If you’re interested in reducing the operational burden of document extraction (invoices, claims, onboarding forms), come talk to us!
0:58

We built an AI agent that lets you vibe-code document extraction - high accuracy and citations over the most complex documents. Our latest release lets you upload documents as context. All you then have to do is describe what you want extracted in natural language. 💡 Our agent will then read the document with file tools to infer the right schema, validation rules, and other pre/postprocessing logic. ✅ It will give you back a workflow that can extract over thousands/millions of documents at scale. You can still of course review and edit every output before approving. Stop handling paperwork manually; just upload files, describe your task, and let our agent handle the rest. Our vision for LlamaAgents is to provide the most advanced and easy-to-use way for you to orchestrate document work. Walkthrough: Check it out: If you’re interested in reducing the operational burden of document extraction (invoices, claims, onboarding forms), come talk to us!

Jerry Liu

20,857 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Introducing NotebookLlama - an open-source version of NotebookLM! 📓🦙 NotebookLlama is a full implementation of NotebookLM that includes all the capabilities that makes it so great for researchers+business users: ✅ Create a knowledge repository of documents. Has likely higher accuracy than NotebookLM since it’s using LlamaCloud under the hood for high-quality parsing/extraction over complex docs. ✅ Generate summaries and knowledge graph mind-maps 🤯 ✅ Generate podcasts thanks to ElevenLabs 🗣️ ✅ Agentic chat with docs and view metrics with OpenTelemetry This all lives within an open-source repo so you can clone/modify at will to swap in your own components! Huge shoutout to Clelia Bertelli (🦙/acc) for leading this. Repo: LlamaCloud helps power the parsing/ingestion. You can always use your own stuff too, but in the meantime you can check out LlamaCloud here:
0:56

Introducing NotebookLlama - an open-source version of NotebookLM! 📓🦙 NotebookLlama is a full implementation of NotebookLM that includes all the capabilities that makes it so great for researchers+business users: ✅ Create a knowledge repository of documents. Has likely higher accuracy than NotebookLM since it’s using LlamaCloud under the hood for high-quality parsing/extraction over complex docs. ✅ Generate summaries and knowledge graph mind-maps 🤯 ✅ Generate podcasts thanks to ElevenLabs 🗣️ ✅ Agentic chat with docs and view metrics with OpenTelemetry This all lives within an open-source repo so you can clone/modify at will to swap in your own components! Huge shoutout to Clelia Bertelli (🦙/acc) for leading this. Repo: LlamaCloud helps power the parsing/ingestion. You can always use your own stuff too, but in the meantime you can check out LlamaCloud here:

Jerry Liu

137,793 просмотров • 1 год назад

Today we’re introducing Extract v2.5 - a series of frontier agents tuned for document extraction. The agents (cost-effective, agentic, agentic plus) are tuned for value accuracy and grounding. Our extraction agents outperform Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol while being 30%-4x cheaper. We’ve made massive improvements on complex extraction over * long lists (86.1% -> 95.5% on our agentic tier) * records spanning pages (85.5% -> 96.5%) * scanned forms (90.9% -> 95.7%) We’ve also launched the following features: ✅ Advanced citations: we locate bounding boxes for all supporting values for an inferred field, even if there's not an exact match. ✅ Structural Reasoning: we tailor document extraction algorithms depending on the type, layout, and information Our extraction agents are SOTA in price-performance on ExtractBench, across a wide range of cost points. We are the best tool for document extraction across documents of any complexity. Blog: All of these are available on LlamaParse: . Come check it out!
2:03

Today we’re introducing Extract v2.5 - a series of frontier agents tuned for document extraction. The agents (cost-effective, agentic, agentic plus) are tuned for value accuracy and grounding. Our extraction agents outperform Opus 5.5 and GPT-6 Sol while being 30%-4x cheaper. We’ve made massive improvements on complex extraction over * long lists (86.1% -> 95.5% on our agentic tier) * records spanning pages (85.5% -> 96.5%) * scanned forms (90.9% -> 95.7%) We’ve also launched the following features: ✅ Advanced citations: we locate bounding boxes for all supporting values for an inferred field, even if there's not an exact match. ✅ Structural Reasoning: we tailor document extraction algorithms depending on the type, layout, and information Our extraction agents are SOTA in price-performance on ExtractBench, across a wide range of cost points. We are the best tool for document extraction across documents of any complexity. Blog: All of these are available on LlamaParse: . Come check it out!

Jerry Liu

51,622 просмотров • 11 дней назад

We tuned an AI agent that can do large-scale document extraction from long docs (50+ pages, some with 10k-100k fields) with 94%+ accuracy 📈 It uses a harness + model set that is tuned specifically for reasoning over extracting out complex information from complex docs. Each extracted field comes with a confidence score as well as a bounding box denoting where it came from. It does 10-20% better in accuracy than generalized coding agent harnesses (e.g. Claude Code Opus 4.8 and Codex GPT-5.6). Check out the video below for a demo. The mode is called LlamaExtract Agentic Plus. Learn more about our extraction benchmark and agentic plus mode here: If you have very complex document extraction needs, come check out LlamaParse!
0:34

We tuned an AI agent that can do large-scale document extraction from long docs (50+ pages, some with 10k-100k fields) with 94%+ accuracy 📈 It uses a harness + model set that is tuned specifically for reasoning over extracting out complex information from complex docs. Each extracted field comes with a confidence score as well as a bounding box denoting where it came from. It does 10-20% better in accuracy than generalized coding agent harnesses (e.g. Claude Code Opus 4.8 and Codex GPT-5.6). Check out the video below for a demo. The mode is called LlamaExtract Agentic Plus. Learn more about our extraction benchmark and agentic plus mode here: If you have very complex document extraction needs, come check out LlamaParse!

Jerry Liu

18,359 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

We’re open sourcing the first document OCR benchmark for the agentic era, ParseBench. Document parsing is the foundation of every AI agent that works with real-world files. ParseBench is a benchmark that measures parsing quality specifically for agent knowledge work: ✅ It optimizes for semantic correctness (instead of exact similarity) ✅ It has the most comprehensive distribution of real-world enterprise documents It contains ~2,000 human-verified enterprise document pages with 167,000+ test rules across five dimensions that matter most: tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, and visual grounding. We benchmarked 14 known document parsers on ParseBench, from frontier/OSS VLMs to specialized parsers to LlamaParse. Here are some of our findings: 💡 Increasing compute budget yields diminishing returns - Gemini/gpt-5-mini/haiku gain 3-5 points from minimal to high thinking, at 4x the cost. 💡 Charts are the most polarizing dimension for evaluation. Most specialized parsers score below 6%, while some VLM-based parsers do a bit better. 💡 VLMs are great at visual understanding but terrible at layout extraction. GPT-5-mini/haiku score below 10% on our visual grounding task, all specialized parsers do much better. 💡 No method crushes all 5 dimensions at once, but LlamaParse achieves the highest overall score at 84.9%, and is the leader in 4 out of the 5 dimensions. This is by far the deepest technical work that we’ve published as a company. I would encourage you to start with our blog and explore our links to Hugging Face to GitHub. All the details are in our full 35-page (!!) ArXiv whitepaper. 🌐: Blog: 📄 Paper: 💻 Code: 📊 Dataset: 🎥 YouTube:
1:08

We’re open sourcing the first document OCR benchmark for the agentic era, ParseBench. Document parsing is the foundation of every AI agent that works with real-world files. ParseBench is a benchmark that measures parsing quality specifically for agent knowledge work: ✅ It optimizes for semantic correctness (instead of exact similarity) ✅ It has the most comprehensive distribution of real-world enterprise documents It contains ~2,000 human-verified enterprise document pages with 167,000+ test rules across five dimensions that matter most: tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, and visual grounding. We benchmarked 14 known document parsers on ParseBench, from frontier/OSS VLMs to specialized parsers to LlamaParse. Here are some of our findings: 💡 Increasing compute budget yields diminishing returns - Gemini/gpt-5-mini/haiku gain 3-5 points from minimal to high thinking, at 4x the cost. 💡 Charts are the most polarizing dimension for evaluation. Most specialized parsers score below 6%, while some VLM-based parsers do a bit better. 💡 VLMs are great at visual understanding but terrible at layout extraction. GPT-5-mini/haiku score below 10% on our visual grounding task, all specialized parsers do much better. 💡 No method crushes all 5 dimensions at once, but LlamaParse achieves the highest overall score at 84.9%, and is the leader in 4 out of the 5 dimensions. This is by far the deepest technical work that we’ve published as a company. I would encourage you to start with our blog and explore our links to Hugging Face to GitHub. All the details are in our full 35-page (!!) ArXiv whitepaper. 🌐: Blog: 📄 Paper: 💻 Code: 📊 Dataset: 🎥 YouTube:

Jerry Liu

108,385 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

As frontier models (e.g. Fable 5) continue to push the task horizon of knowledge work automation, it becomes ever more important for humans to be able to audit decisions back to the source context. It is extremely easy for agents to cite an entire document or document page, but much harder for them to trace back to the exact numbers/words/figures within a page. Today we've launched granular bounding boxes within LlamaParse, which allows you to obtain visual citations of every single word in the document. This allows human users to audit exact words and figures - not just general document regions or entire pages! Come check it out:
0:51

As frontier models (e.g. Fable 5) continue to push the task horizon of knowledge work automation, it becomes ever more important for humans to be able to audit decisions back to the source context. It is extremely easy for agents to cite an entire document or document page, but much harder for them to trace back to the exact numbers/words/figures within a page. Today we've launched granular bounding boxes within LlamaParse, which allows you to obtain visual citations of every single word in the document. This allows human users to audit exact words and figures - not just general document regions or entire pages! Come check it out:

Jerry Liu

23,491 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

I’ve excited to announce a brand-new website and documentation hub 💫 that solidifies our evolution towards automating knowledge work over your documents. You might’ve followed us since the “RAG framework” days. Even then, the biggest challenge users faced was figuring out how to actually ingest an entire collection of unstructured docs (.pdf, .pptx, .docx, and more) for chatbot/agentic workflow use cases. Over the past year we’ve progressively built up incredibly deep tech around document parsing, extraction, and indexing - while teaching developers how to build various workflows on top. We’re now going all in on documents, and we’re the only company that has both 1) SOTA document processing and file management 📈, and 2) agentic orchestration on top to solve use cases like deep research, report generation, and document workflows end-to-end. Our llamas will continue to love all sorts of data (we have 600+ integrations on the open-source framework!), but they now especially love automating paperwork 🦙📄. If you would also love to automate paperwork, come check out our new website and come talk to us! Site: Developer Hub:
3:07

I’ve excited to announce a brand-new website and documentation hub 💫 that solidifies our evolution towards automating knowledge work over your documents. You might’ve followed us since the “RAG framework” days. Even then, the biggest challenge users faced was figuring out how to actually ingest an entire collection of unstructured docs (.pdf, .pptx, .docx, and more) for chatbot/agentic workflow use cases. Over the past year we’ve progressively built up incredibly deep tech around document parsing, extraction, and indexing - while teaching developers how to build various workflows on top. We’re now going all in on documents, and we’re the only company that has both 1) SOTA document processing and file management 📈, and 2) agentic orchestration on top to solve use cases like deep research, report generation, and document workflows end-to-end. Our llamas will continue to love all sorts of data (we have 600+ integrations on the open-source framework!), but they now especially love automating paperwork 🦙📄. If you would also love to automate paperwork, come check out our new website and come talk to us! Site: Developer Hub:

Jerry Liu

25,710 просмотров • 1 год назад

I used Claude Code Skills + souped up PDF parsing to create an M&A deal comp agent 🤖 Given a directory of public M&A filings (DEF 14A), it parses and analyzes each pdf, and generates an Excel sheet with deal terms and comparables. 1️⃣ The native parsing is pypdf which sucks, so I swapped it out with LlamaIndex semtools. This uses LlamaCloud for parsing - letting it handle deeply complex financial tables, charts, and anything else you throw at it. 2️⃣ Claude has native skills to write Excel spreadsheets! Full prompt is in the video below 👇 LlamaCloud + Semtools access also takes < 5 mins to setup, come check it out! Some notes: - disclaimer: Some of the values in the Excel spreadsheet are 100x bigger because they’re formatted as percentages not raw values - We’re working on native Claude skill integrations too! Semtools: LlamaCloud:
1:09

I used Claude Code Skills + souped up PDF parsing to create an M&A deal comp agent 🤖 Given a directory of public M&A filings (DEF 14A), it parses and analyzes each pdf, and generates an Excel sheet with deal terms and comparables. 1️⃣ The native parsing is pypdf which sucks, so I swapped it out with LlamaIndex semtools. This uses LlamaCloud for parsing - letting it handle deeply complex financial tables, charts, and anything else you throw at it. 2️⃣ Claude has native skills to write Excel spreadsheets! Full prompt is in the video below 👇 LlamaCloud + Semtools access also takes < 5 mins to setup, come check it out! Some notes: - disclaimer: Some of the values in the Excel spreadsheet are 100x bigger because they’re formatted as percentages not raw values - We’re working on native Claude skill integrations too! Semtools: LlamaCloud:

Jerry Liu

46,748 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Today we’re announcing r-1, our new document parsing model. It’s more accurate than our most powerful agentic OCR models, faster, and up to 6x cheaper. At Reducto, we spent two years building specialized models for complex visual layouts, tables spanning multiple pages, and key formatting like strikethroughs. We then used everything we learned to build r-1, the first in a new generation of models designed to handle the hardest documents without multiplying cost. This early preview delivers a 20% lower error rate than our most accurate legacy agentic models and will keep improving with new checkpoints over the next few weeks. Accuracy is only the beginning. r-1 preview is available at 1¢ per page all-in, with additional volume discounts as you scale. In the near term we’re also going to release r-1 mini, and an auto mode that intelligently selects the right approach for each page. If you’re currently using another parser, we’re offering up to $5,000 in credits to evaluate and migrate. You can claim the migration offer and learn more about r-1 using the links in the comments. Happy parsing!
1:22

Today we’re announcing r-1, our new document parsing model. It’s more accurate than our most powerful agentic OCR models, faster, and up to 6x cheaper. At Reducto, we spent two years building specialized models for complex visual layouts, tables spanning multiple pages, and key formatting like strikethroughs. We then used everything we learned to build r-1, the first in a new generation of models designed to handle the hardest documents without multiplying cost. This early preview delivers a 20% lower error rate than our most accurate legacy agentic models and will keep improving with new checkpoints over the next few weeks. Accuracy is only the beginning. r-1 preview is available at 1¢ per page all-in, with additional volume discounts as you scale. In the near term we’re also going to release r-1 mini, and an auto mode that intelligently selects the right approach for each page. If you’re currently using another parser, we’re offering up to $5,000 in credits to evaluate and migrate. You can claim the migration offer and learn more about r-1 using the links in the comments. Happy parsing!

Adit

303,446 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The latest RAG trend for the current agent harnesses (Codex, Cowork) is to do two passes of document processing to solve a knowledge work task over a data room of documents: 1️⃣ A fast and light pass, oftentimes using a free/OSS doc parsing tool. This can be cheaply run across 10-100-1k’s of files, and enables the agent to then do retrieval (e.g. grep, semantic) to find relevant subsets of context. 2️⃣ A “just-in-time” VLM-based pass. Once the agent finds the relevant pages of context, it will screenshot the documents can call its own VLM (or write code) to dissect the pages. The issue with only using VLM-based OCR tools over massive ad-hoc customer file dumps is that it’s slow and expensive. Doing JIT VLM OCR allows the agent to filter through the data cheaply, but still preserve accuracy for the context that’s needed for the task. The agent harnesses do two-pass document processing by default using off the shelf-tools: pdf2text as the first pass, and using itself (Opus 5) as the second pass. See the below video where Cowork runs over a bunch of PDFs to answer a question about a benchmark graph in the Kimi k3 paper. The main issues here with the “out of the box” doc processing these agents offer are: * Opus 5 is not the best VLM for OCR. It is also way too expensive at scale and lacks grounding * The OSS tools like pypdf, pdf2text, may not be versatile enough as the first pass. * The agent will write a lot of throwaway code to rewrite things an OCR tool would’ve provided out of the box, like chart processing, bounding boxes, confidence scores, leading to increased cost and speed. We have all the tools within LlamaIndex 🦙 to help any agent do two-pass document processing with higher accuracy and lower cost. 1️⃣ We have liteparse for the first pass - a free/OSS parser written in Rust that’s faster/more accurate than other OSS parsers, and supports 50+ document types 2️⃣ We have LlamaParse for the second pass - an agentic document engine that uses VLMs+harnesses to achieve SOTA in accuracy and cost across various doc parsing and extraction tasks. It can be called from any agent harness as an MCP or skill. It takes in page numbers as input, so that the agent can choose to run LlamaParse over a subset of the doc instead of the full doc as a “zoom-in” pass. Come check it out! LiteParse: LlamaParse: All the relevant docs, including MCP, are here:
1:24

The latest RAG trend for the current agent harnesses (Codex, Cowork) is to do two passes of document processing to solve a knowledge work task over a data room of documents: 1️⃣ A fast and light pass, oftentimes using a free/OSS doc parsing tool. This can be cheaply run across 10-100-1k’s of files, and enables the agent to then do retrieval (e.g. grep, semantic) to find relevant subsets of context. 2️⃣ A “just-in-time” VLM-based pass. Once the agent finds the relevant pages of context, it will screenshot the documents can call its own VLM (or write code) to dissect the pages. The issue with only using VLM-based OCR tools over massive ad-hoc customer file dumps is that it’s slow and expensive. Doing JIT VLM OCR allows the agent to filter through the data cheaply, but still preserve accuracy for the context that’s needed for the task. The agent harnesses do two-pass document processing by default using off the shelf-tools: pdf2text as the first pass, and using itself (Opus 5) as the second pass. See the below video where Cowork runs over a bunch of PDFs to answer a question about a benchmark graph in the Kimi k3 paper. The main issues here with the “out of the box” doc processing these agents offer are: * Opus 5 is not the best VLM for OCR. It is also way too expensive at scale and lacks grounding * The OSS tools like pypdf, pdf2text, may not be versatile enough as the first pass. * The agent will write a lot of throwaway code to rewrite things an OCR tool would’ve provided out of the box, like chart processing, bounding boxes, confidence scores, leading to increased cost and speed. We have all the tools within LlamaIndex 🦙 to help any agent do two-pass document processing with higher accuracy and lower cost. 1️⃣ We have liteparse for the first pass - a free/OSS parser written in Rust that’s faster/more accurate than other OSS parsers, and supports 50+ document types 2️⃣ We have LlamaParse for the second pass - an agentic document engine that uses VLMs+harnesses to achieve SOTA in accuracy and cost across various doc parsing and extraction tasks. It can be called from any agent harness as an MCP or skill. It takes in page numbers as input, so that the agent can choose to run LlamaParse over a subset of the doc instead of the full doc as a “zoom-in” pass. Come check it out! LiteParse: LlamaParse: All the relevant docs, including MCP, are here:

Jerry Liu

23,119 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

If you’re building an “agent over your PDFs” in 2026, one of the most underrated things you can do is to provide exact grounding back to the source document for any agentic answers. Specifically, showing the exact word, line, or region that the answer came from. Frontier vision models do a terrible job at this. They have a hard time predicting exact bounding boxes over region, tying it back to the source answer, and surfacing it as context in a cost-effective and accurate manner. Dedicated VLM-based document OCR/extraction tools like LlamaParse are a lot better at visual grounding and specifically tying it to extracted outputs. One of our main evaluation areas in ExtractBench, our recently released real-world benchmark, is to evaluate the visual grounding capabilities of document extraction. ExtractBench: If you want to give LlamaParse a shot, come check it out:
0:52

If you’re building an “agent over your PDFs” in 2026, one of the most underrated things you can do is to provide exact grounding back to the source document for any agentic answers. Specifically, showing the exact word, line, or region that the answer came from. Frontier vision models do a terrible job at this. They have a hard time predicting exact bounding boxes over region, tying it back to the source answer, and surfacing it as context in a cost-effective and accurate manner. Dedicated VLM-based document OCR/extraction tools like LlamaParse are a lot better at visual grounding and specifically tying it to extracted outputs. One of our main evaluation areas in ExtractBench, our recently released real-world benchmark, is to evaluate the visual grounding capabilities of document extraction. ExtractBench: If you want to give LlamaParse a shot, come check it out:

Jerry Liu

14,515 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🦙 Since you loved NotebookLlaMa, our open-source, LlamaCloud-backed NotebookLM alternative, we decided to give you more features! In the latest release you can: 📊 Extract and download images and tables from your files, and interactively visualize all tabular data ✅ Chat with your document and verify immediately everything that AI is saying about it, using the new claim verification and citation finding functionality 👇 Watch the video below for a full demo of the new functionalities 👩‍💻🧑‍💻 There is also a bonus: thanks to the community effort and contribution, you can now customize the embedding model you want to use to build the LlamaCloud index, through a textualize.io CLI! ⭐ Star NotebookLlaMa on GitHub: 🦙☁️ Sign-up for LlamaCloud and test our awesome products: 📚 Learn more about LlamaCloud:
1:13

🦙 Since you loved NotebookLlaMa, our open-source, LlamaCloud-backed NotebookLM alternative, we decided to give you more features! In the latest release you can: 📊 Extract and download images and tables from your files, and interactively visualize all tabular data ✅ Chat with your document and verify immediately everything that AI is saying about it, using the new claim verification and citation finding functionality 👇 Watch the video below for a full demo of the new functionalities 👩‍💻🧑‍💻 There is also a bonus: thanks to the community effort and contribution, you can now customize the embedding model you want to use to build the LlamaCloud index, through a textualize.io CLI! ⭐ Star NotebookLlaMa on GitHub: 🦙☁️ Sign-up for LlamaCloud and test our awesome products: 📚 Learn more about LlamaCloud:

LlamaIndex 🦙

11,466 просмотров • 1 год назад

We’re on a mission to parse the world’s hardest PDFs, and we’d love your help There are so many document types that introduce a million edge cases for current VLMs / OCR: handwritten forms, badly scanned/rotated pages, charts, diagrams, and more. We are running a contest right now for you to try to extract the hardest PDFs you can find. Come sign up on our agent builder, describe what you want to extract through natural language, upload your document, and show the results. If our platform doesn’t work, even better; this is great feedback for us to improve our service. Either way submit your project and we’d love to get your feedback! Check out LlamaCloud here:
0:34

We’re on a mission to parse the world’s hardest PDFs, and we’d love your help There are so many document types that introduce a million edge cases for current VLMs / OCR: handwritten forms, badly scanned/rotated pages, charts, diagrams, and more. We are running a contest right now for you to try to extract the hardest PDFs you can find. Come sign up on our agent builder, describe what you want to extract through natural language, upload your document, and show the results. If our platform doesn’t work, even better; this is great feedback for us to improve our service. Either way submit your project and we’d love to get your feedback! Check out LlamaCloud here:

Jerry Liu

21,005 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад