正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

We’re excited to officially launch LlamaParse, the first genAI-native document parsing solution. Not only is it better at parsing out images/tables/charts 📊📈 than virtually every other parser, it is now steerable through natural language instructions - output the document in whatever format you desire! It is also the only...

143,136 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Manish Sinha 的头像
Manish Sinha2 年前

Charts ( bar graph) and images ( of math formulae’s) don’t work still. Text and tables work well ( especially tables accuracy and markdown format). Will test more elaborately later.

DataStax 的头像
DataStax2 年前

Congrats @llama_index team! LlamaParse is 🔥🔥🔥

matthew muller 的头像
matthew muller2 年前

Is there a data privacy statement for llamacloud? I cant seem to find that... thx!

Duc Nguyen Huu 的头像
Duc Nguyen Huu2 年前

I have a question on information security when using llama-parse. For example, I have pdf files and I want to use llama-parse for parsing. My concern is whether utilizing llama-parse through API access poses any potential risks of information leakage.

Andrew Batutin ☸️/acc 的头像
Andrew Batutin ☸️/acc2 年前

Is this price on top of Claude 3 pricing? Or it’s for all including llm calls?

LlamaIndex 🦙 的头像
LlamaIndex 🦙2 年前

That's the full price!

nohrt 的头像
nohrt2 年前

Great stuff!! good job :) Now if you could fix the issue of auto rotating pages i would be able to use llama parse :P

RM 的头像
RM2 年前

Here's my article. Please upvote!

Art Intelligence 的头像
Art Intelligence2 年前

It doesn’t seem to work well with chinese documents and papers. It is also lacking the feature of translating text.

LLL 的头像
LLL2 年前

mathpix is excellent at parsing academic pdfs, did you have a comparison with them when you mentioned "better virtually every other parsers"?

相关视频

We’re open sourcing the first document OCR benchmark for the agentic era, ParseBench. Document parsing is the foundation of every AI agent that works with real-world files. ParseBench is a benchmark that measures parsing quality specifically for agent knowledge work: ✅ It optimizes for semantic correctness (instead of exact similarity) ✅ It has the most comprehensive distribution of real-world enterprise documents It contains ~2,000 human-verified enterprise document pages with 167,000+ test rules across five dimensions that matter most: tables, charts, content faithfulness, semantic formatting, and visual grounding. We benchmarked 14 known document parsers on ParseBench, from frontier/OSS VLMs to specialized parsers to LlamaParse. Here are some of our findings: 💡 Increasing compute budget yields diminishing returns - Gemini/gpt-5-mini/haiku gain 3-5 points from minimal to high thinking, at 4x the cost. 💡 Charts are the most polarizing dimension for evaluation. Most specialized parsers score below 6%, while some VLM-based parsers do a bit better. 💡 VLMs are great at visual understanding but terrible at layout extraction. GPT-5-mini/haiku score below 10% on our visual grounding task, all specialized parsers do much better. 💡 No method crushes all 5 dimensions at once, but LlamaParse achieves the highest overall score at 84.9%, and is the leader in 4 out of the 5 dimensions. This is by far the deepest technical work that we’ve published as a company. I would encourage you to start with our blog and explore our links to Hugging Face to GitHub. All the details are in our full 35-page (!!) ArXiv whitepaper. 🌐: Blog: 📄 Paper: 💻 Code: 📊 Dataset: 🎥 YouTube:

Jerry Liu

107,866 次观看 • 2 个月前