Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Like this glowing Andrew Tate interview? Candace spends almost two minutes gushing about “Hustler University,” claiming she unknowingly hired a HustlerU grad and asked him, “Dude, you’re a hustler…What school did you go to- Harvard? Columbia?” The answer: “Hustler University. I went to Andrew Tate’s school.” Candace repeatedly declares... show more

Jackie Chea ⚖️

22,234 subscribers

31,682 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Brandon Tatum defending his friendship with Candace by claiming you can be friends with someone even though you disagree on a certain topic. It’s true—you can be friends with someone you disagree with. But this isn’t like disagreeing about who to vote for or the tax rate. It’s not even just disagreeing on who murdered Charlie Kirk. What Candace is doing and the way she’s doing it exposes a deep-seated character issue, and I wouldn’t want that person as my friend. I get it’s tough when you go way back, though. That said, sometimes you’ve got to just let them go and pray for them. It’s not just a matter of a disagreement in perception; Candace is a bad person. Even if she truly believed there was more to the story about what happened to Charlie Kirk, she could’ve gone about it a completely different way, and she chose to not. And she wakes up everyday and continues to choose to not.

Brandon Tatum defending his friendship with Candace by claiming you can be friends with someone even though you disagree on a certain topic. It’s true—you can be friends with someone you disagree with. But this isn’t like disagreeing about who to vote for or the tax rate. It’s not even just disagreeing on who murdered Charlie Kirk. What Candace is doing and the way she’s doing it exposes a deep-seated character issue, and I wouldn’t want that person as my friend. I get it’s tough when you go way back, though. That said, sometimes you’ve got to just let them go and pray for them. It’s not just a matter of a disagreement in perception; Candace is a bad person. Even if she truly believed there was more to the story about what happened to Charlie Kirk, she could’ve gone about it a completely different way, and she chose to not. And she wakes up everyday and continues to choose to not.

Natalie Jean Beisner

15,633 views • 8 days ago

$I’ve spent a ton of time at top universities and here’s what I've noticed: The freshman walking in the door at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Harvard University, Tufts University, Princeton University, Stanford University, etc. are nearly identical. Same SAT scores, same drive, same raw talent. But the fraction that come out the other side and start a company? Wildly different. Stanford is way out in front. Princeton is shockingly far behind. When I ask them why, the answer is almost always the same: "I went down this path because someone two years ahead of me did it. I watched them, I learned from them, and I did what they did." It's a culture thing, and it propagates like wildfire. All you need is a small hand full of breakout success stories and that will inspire dozens of others to follow suit. If you're a student at a school that doesn't have entrepreneurial culture yet, you have a massive opportunity to be the trailblazer who kickstarts it.$

I’ve spent a ton of time at top universities and here’s what I've noticed: The freshman walking in the door at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Harvard University, Tufts University, Princeton University, Stanford University, etc. are nearly identical. Same SAT scores, same drive, same raw talent. But the fraction that come out the other side and start a company? Wildly different. Stanford is way out in front. Princeton is shockingly far behind. When I ask them why, the answer is almost always the same: "I went down this path because someone two years ahead of me did it. I watched them, I learned from them, and I did what they did." It's a culture thing, and it propagates like wildfire. All you need is a small hand full of breakout success stories and that will inspire dozens of others to follow suit. If you're a student at a school that doesn't have entrepreneurial culture yet, you have a massive opportunity to be the trailblazer who kickstarts it.

Dave Blundin

42,181 views • 2 months ago

I don't care if you are for or against affirmative action. I can see both sides of the argument, but if you think that Charlie Kirk has more "brain processing power" than Ketanji Brown Jackson and Michelle Obama, then you are not paying attention. Charlie Kirk: Did not Attend college of any kind. Ketanji Brown Jackson: In high school she excelled in debate and speech competition. She enrolled in Harvard University in 1988. In 1992, she graduated from Harvard-Radcliffe with a Bachelor’s Degree in Government. She earned a Juris Doctor (J.D.) from Harvard Law School in 1996. Michelle Obama: She earned a bachelor's degree from Princeton University and a juris doctor degree from Harvard Law School. She majored in sociology and minored in African-American studies, graduating cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in 1985. Thoughts?

I don't care if you are for or against affirmative action. I can see both sides of the argument, but if you think that Charlie Kirk has more "brain processing power" than Ketanji Brown Jackson and Michelle Obama, then you are not paying attention. Charlie Kirk: Did not Attend college of any kind. Ketanji Brown Jackson: In high school she excelled in debate and speech competition. She enrolled in Harvard University in 1988. In 1992, she graduated from Harvard-Radcliffe with a Bachelor’s Degree in Government. She earned a Juris Doctor (J.D.) from Harvard Law School in 1996. Michelle Obama: She earned a bachelor's degree from Princeton University and a juris doctor degree from Harvard Law School. She majored in sociology and minored in African-American studies, graduating cum laude with a Bachelor of Arts in 1985. Thoughts?

Brian Krassenstein

1,448,632 views • 3 years ago

Candace Owens tells Andrew Wilson she believes it is possible Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive rather than a bullet and argues the theory should be explored. Andrew Wilson: "Do you think that Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive?" Candace Owens: "I think that it's a possibility, yes, and it should be explored." Andrew Wilson: "You have energy and you have mass, and the mass is moving in the air, the air has to go somewhere." Candace Owens: "Why is his shirt moving first, that didn't make sense to me. If you watch it in slow, his necklace breaks first, which I thought was very odd. And then you see a puff [under his shirt]. And then the next thing you know there's the entry wound on his neck." Andrew Wilson: "Do you see smoke?" Candace Owens: "I would not confidently assert that I see smoke." Andrew Wilson: "Do you think that an explosion generally would have smoke?" Candace Owens: "I don't think that there's any quality version of video that would get us to be able to answer that question."

Candace Owens tells Andrew Wilson she believes it is possible Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive rather than a bullet and argues the theory should be explored. Andrew Wilson: "Do you think that Charlie Kirk was killed with an explosive?" Candace Owens: "I think that it's a possibility, yes, and it should be explored." Andrew Wilson: "You have energy and you have mass, and the mass is moving in the air, the air has to go somewhere." Candace Owens: "Why is his shirt moving first, that didn't make sense to me. If you watch it in slow, his necklace breaks first, which I thought was very odd. And then you see a puff [under his shirt]. And then the next thing you know there's the entry wound on his neck." Andrew Wilson: "Do you see smoke?" Candace Owens: "I would not confidently assert that I see smoke." Andrew Wilson: "Do you think that an explosion generally would have smoke?" Candace Owens: "I don't think that there's any quality version of video that would get us to be able to answer that question."

PBD Podcast

176,958 views • 1 month ago

Candace Owens Candace Owens responds to Andrew Kolvet Andrew Kolvet after he posted PROOF on X that she was LYING and gaslighting. Again. Confronted by her own text messages, Candace could no longer deny that she said Erika Kirk murdered Charlie; So…she pivots (by telling another lie) saying, “it was just a joke… I stand by it… I still think it’s funny…” Then, just like she did with Laura Loomer (and anyone who dares to confront her), Candace attacks Andrew- calls him a “narcissist” that “abuses the public” and then “jokes” that he’s gay.

Candace Owens Candace Owens responds to Andrew Kolvet Andrew Kolvet after he posted PROOF on X that she was LYING and gaslighting. Again. Confronted by her own text messages, Candace could no longer deny that she said Erika Kirk murdered Charlie; So…she pivots (by telling another lie) saying, “it was just a joke… I stand by it… I still think it’s funny…” Then, just like she did with Laura Loomer (and anyone who dares to confront her), Candace attacks Andrew- calls him a “narcissist” that “abuses the public” and then “jokes” that he’s gay.

Ally

102,075 views • 4 months ago

WOW 😮 Candace Owens is pretending that she’s going to debate Andrew Wilson‼️ Candace has been ducking debates for nearly a year but now she’s supposedly accepted the offer to debate Andrew Wilson. BUT THERE’S A CATCH. Candace refuses to debate alone. She demands that her entire team can basically debate for her. She wants to be in her home studio. Ear piece in. With multiple people feeding her information and trying to fact check her opponent. BUT NOT JUST THAT. She also demands that TPUSA publicly announces that Andrew Wilson is debating for them on their behalf. So long story short Candace isn’t really trying to debate. I also thought it was gross that Candace is acting like Andrew is a peasant because he doesn’t have $500,000 sitting around. If she thinks this lowly of Andrew because he isn’t filthy rich like her just imagine how she really feels about her fans.

WOW 😮 Candace Owens is pretending that she’s going to debate Andrew Wilson‼️ Candace has been ducking debates for nearly a year but now she’s supposedly accepted the offer to debate Andrew Wilson. BUT THERE’S A CATCH. Candace refuses to debate alone. She demands that her entire team can basically debate for her. She wants to be in her home studio. Ear piece in. With multiple people feeding her information and trying to fact check her opponent. BUT NOT JUST THAT. She also demands that TPUSA publicly announces that Andrew Wilson is debating for them on their behalf. So long story short Candace isn’t really trying to debate. I also thought it was gross that Candace is acting like Andrew is a peasant because he doesn’t have $500,000 sitting around. If she thinks this lowly of Andrew because he isn’t filthy rich like her just imagine how she really feels about her fans.

Cinema Shogun

51,895 views • 1 month ago

You know, I almost feel sort of sorry for those now facing off against Candace Owens. What the likes of Andrew Wilson, TPUSA, or even Netanyahu don’t understand is that she is just so good at what she does. Like a Jedi master. And the reason for that is because she ain’t acting; she ain’t playing a part; she is who she is. It’s a natural God given gift. You can’t imitate it. You can’t rehearse it. You can’t learn it. There ain’t no courses for it. At best, a person realises they have the gift, and if they’re blessed, they learn what to do with it. And the fact that she’s chosen the side of good over evil; aligned herself with the righteousness of God over iniquity of the devil… Well that don’t bode well for the other side. The forces of darkness are gathering just beyond the horizon. Their agents are already among us. And the time is almost upon us. But to be honest, they ain’t that impressive. Still. Time to pick a side.

You know, I almost feel sort of sorry for those now facing off against Candace Owens. What the likes of Andrew Wilson, TPUSA, or even Netanyahu don’t understand is that she is just so good at what she does. Like a Jedi master. And the reason for that is because she ain’t acting; she ain’t playing a part; she is who she is. It’s a natural God given gift. You can’t imitate it. You can’t rehearse it. You can’t learn it. There ain’t no courses for it. At best, a person realises they have the gift, and if they’re blessed, they learn what to do with it. And the fact that she’s chosen the side of good over evil; aligned herself with the righteousness of God over iniquity of the devil… Well that don’t bode well for the other side. The forces of darkness are gathering just beyond the horizon. Their agents are already among us. And the time is almost upon us. But to be honest, they ain’t that impressive. Still. Time to pick a side.

John Galt

57,865 views • 1 month ago

Candace Owens tells Andrew Wilson the Robinson family stopped trusting the feds. Wilson asks: "How do you know any of that?" Candace says she has "a source." Wilson replies: "Cool story." CANDACE: "Right after the shooting happened, Lance Twiggs, the FBI put him into a safe house they paid for. They went to the parents as well, to Matt Robinson and Amber, basically said, 'Your life's at risk. There could be somebody who jumps up and wants to avenge Charlie Kirk, and we're gonna watch you.' And they went into a federal safe house. What happened next is that they started thinking that the feds were maybe not as honest as they thought." WILSON: "How do you know any of that?" CANDACE: "You gotta watch the show." WILSON: "No, how do you know that?" CANDACE: "I had a source within the Robinson family." WILSON: "You have a source — an anonymous source, of course — so there's no way for us to verify that what you're saying right now is actually even true." CANDACE: "You find it to be reliable hearsay?" WILSON: "No... What you're doing is a cool story." CANDACE: "It's not cool."

Candace Owens tells Andrew Wilson the Robinson family stopped trusting the feds. Wilson asks: "How do you know any of that?" Candace says she has "a source." Wilson replies: "Cool story." CANDACE: "Right after the shooting happened, Lance Twiggs, the FBI put him into a safe house they paid for. They went to the parents as well, to Matt Robinson and Amber, basically said, 'Your life's at risk. There could be somebody who jumps up and wants to avenge Charlie Kirk, and we're gonna watch you.' And they went into a federal safe house. What happened next is that they started thinking that the feds were maybe not as honest as they thought." WILSON: "How do you know any of that?" CANDACE: "You gotta watch the show." WILSON: "No, how do you know that?" CANDACE: "I had a source within the Robinson family." WILSON: "You have a source — an anonymous source, of course — so there's no way for us to verify that what you're saying right now is actually even true." CANDACE: "You find it to be reliable hearsay?" WILSON: "No... What you're doing is a cool story." CANDACE: "It's not cool."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

460,555 views • 1 month ago

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

36,934 views • 1 month ago

This was the point of the debate where Candace Owens lost and Andrew Wilson won. Let me explain. Here, Andrew Wilson put the question to Candace Owens succinctly and directly: Were TPUSA and Erika Kirk involved in the murder of Charlie, in any capacity? Candace has been saying that they were involved for months. She repeatedly referred to Erika as a “black widow” and the “bride of Charlie.” She repeatedly accused Charlie’s head of security Brian Harpole of orchestrating the hit. But when push comes to shove, Candace retreats and obfuscates. Instead of defending her long-held positions, she says she doesn’t want to get into a legal pickle. When confronted with her prior statements, Candace says that “complicit” simply meant complicity in saying that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. When you refuse to back up your claims with evidence, you lose the debate, but Candace Owens went further than that. She denied even having the claims in the first place.

This was the point of the debate where Candace Owens lost and Andrew Wilson won. Let me explain. Here, Andrew Wilson put the question to Candace Owens succinctly and directly: Were TPUSA and Erika Kirk involved in the murder of Charlie, in any capacity? Candace has been saying that they were involved for months. She repeatedly referred to Erika as a “black widow” and the “bride of Charlie.” She repeatedly accused Charlie’s head of security Brian Harpole of orchestrating the hit. But when push comes to shove, Candace retreats and obfuscates. Instead of defending her long-held positions, she says she doesn’t want to get into a legal pickle. When confronted with her prior statements, Candace says that “complicit” simply meant complicity in saying that Tyler Robinson was the shooter. When you refuse to back up your claims with evidence, you lose the debate, but Candace Owens went further than that. She denied even having the claims in the first place.

Defiant Baptist

25,797 views • 1 month ago

I Asked Candace What the Single Most Disturbing Thing She Believes Is Real “Everyone knew what Epstein was doing, and then he was protected. They knew that he went to prison. I think about this all the time. It’s a system, and that’s not imagined. If the Epstein thing didn’t wake you up to the fact that it’s left and right, you’re still asleep.” Candace Owens

I Asked Candace What the Single Most Disturbing Thing She Believes Is Real “Everyone knew what Epstein was doing, and then he was protected. They knew that he went to prison. I think about this all the time. It’s a system, and that’s not imagined. If the Epstein thing didn’t wake you up to the fact that it’s left and right, you’re still asleep.” Candace Owens

Shawn Ryan

681,614 views • 2 months ago

I almost cannot believe this is real. Everyone who has paid any amount of attention to the Candace v Erika/TPUSA issue knows full well that Candace herself said in the early days following Charlie's death that if Erika asked her to stop her "investigation" she would stop. Erika asked her to stop, repeatedly, as we all saw. Candace refused (in other words, she lied. AGAIN.) And now? NOW she's mad about the Daily Wire doing some new series that features someone mocking her called "In the Know Know." But that's not even the amazing part. The amazing part is that she believes that if she asks them to stop, they should stop. Candace has demonstrated a severe lack of awareness before, but this? This is a whole new level of it. BEHOLD:

I almost cannot believe this is real. Everyone who has paid any amount of attention to the Candace v Erika/TPUSA issue knows full well that Candace herself said in the early days following Charlie's death that if Erika asked her to stop her "investigation" she would stop. Erika asked her to stop, repeatedly, as we all saw. Candace refused (in other words, she lied. AGAIN.) And now? NOW she's mad about the Daily Wire doing some new series that features someone mocking her called "In the Know Know." But that's not even the amazing part. The amazing part is that she believes that if she asks them to stop, they should stop. Candace has demonstrated a severe lack of awareness before, but this? This is a whole new level of it. BEHOLD:

Chicks On The Right

169,861 views • 8 months ago

This is long but worth it: Yesterday I was watching the 2024 Candace/Tristan Tate interview to check my facts on a post, and it gave me an insight into her thinking. Candace justifies her defense of these two pornographer brothers based on their support for HER. Bc they had her back, she views them as good, and she excuses their past. She contrasts that with someone like Andrew Klavan who she thinks betrayed her, which makes him evil. “I don’t support pornography… I’m aware of their history… it’s easy for people who had easy lives to say what they would or could not get involved in at any time… Also, the people that you think are evil, like this person – I will tell you, when everything was going down with me, you and Andrew from the second it was happening were like, ‘We have your back, 100%.” It’s striking how Candace can excuse two men who were admittedly involved in sexual exploitation while framing Erika Kirk as a sex trafficker. It’s easily explained by her own words: “I will go with my instincts of the people who I think have the capacity to do tremendous good- even if their backgrounds are not squeaky clean- over the people who have squeaky clean backgrounds and I believe have the potential to do real evil in this world.” Candace decides who is good & who is evil based on how they relate to her, and then she condemns or exonerates them accordingly.

This is long but worth it: Yesterday I was watching the 2024 Candace/Tristan Tate interview to check my facts on a post, and it gave me an insight into her thinking. Candace justifies her defense of these two pornographer brothers based on their support for HER. Bc they had her back, she views them as good, and she excuses their past. She contrasts that with someone like Andrew Klavan who she thinks betrayed her, which makes him evil. “I don’t support pornography… I’m aware of their history… it’s easy for people who had easy lives to say what they would or could not get involved in at any time… Also, the people that you think are evil, like this person – I will tell you, when everything was going down with me, you and Andrew from the second it was happening were like, ‘We have your back, 100%.” It’s striking how Candace can excuse two men who were admittedly involved in sexual exploitation while framing Erika Kirk as a sex trafficker. It’s easily explained by her own words: “I will go with my instincts of the people who I think have the capacity to do tremendous good- even if their backgrounds are not squeaky clean- over the people who have squeaky clean backgrounds and I believe have the potential to do real evil in this world.” Candace decides who is good & who is evil based on how they relate to her, and then she condemns or exonerates them accordingly.

Jackie Chea ⚖️

38,419 views • 2 months ago

🔥👀 WOW. “Do you have any evidence that Erika Kirk or TPUSA participated in the murder of Charlie Kirk?” - Andrew Wilson “I never said that” - Candace Owens “So you don’t believe they did” - Wilson “I’ve never said that statement … so I’m not gonna get you to ask me personal question about things I never said” - Candace A video is then played where Candace says France & Israel are involved. Candace is getting upset that Andrew Wilson is asking for positive evidence of her claims on PBD Podcast during the debate.

🔥👀 WOW. “Do you have any evidence that Erika Kirk or TPUSA participated in the murder of Charlie Kirk?” - Andrew Wilson “I never said that” - Candace Owens “So you don’t believe they did” - Wilson “I’ve never said that statement … so I’m not gonna get you to ask me personal question about things I never said” - Candace A video is then played where Candace says France & Israel are involved. Candace is getting upset that Andrew Wilson is asking for positive evidence of her claims on PBD Podcast during the debate.

Johnny St.Pete

21,068 views • 1 month ago

Prepare for Candace to explode 😂. This is awkward. Jeremy Boreing finally speaks out. Says hiring Candace Owens was the biggest professional mistake he’s ever made. He says he asked her (twice) a simple question: “What do you actually believe?” She didn’t answer. Instead, she said she speaks for “the people.” That’s … interesting. Because “I speak for the people” isn’t a belief system. It’s a shield. It’s also the oldest move in the book for anyone who doesn’t want to be pinned down to facts, principles, or consistency. It’s what cult leaders say. Do with that what you will. 🤷‍♂️

Prepare for Candace to explode 😂. This is awkward. Jeremy Boreing finally speaks out. Says hiring Candace Owens was the biggest professional mistake he’s ever made. He says he asked her (twice) a simple question: “What do you actually believe?” She didn’t answer. Instead, she said she speaks for “the people.” That’s … interesting. Because “I speak for the people” isn’t a belief system. It’s a shield. It’s also the oldest move in the book for anyone who doesn’t want to be pinned down to facts, principles, or consistency. It’s what cult leaders say. Do with that what you will. 🤷‍♂️

Bren

215,094 views • 7 months ago

Drop your comment on this and share your two cents! I know this lady personally,she was a big hustler,worked as HR for close to 10 years and she went to Canada and now she is always pushing deals in Zimbabwe. Her argument being it’s relatively easy to raise finance in diaspora but you will have to make money in Zimbabwe that is where the opportunities lie. Retired Procastinator

Drop your comment on this and share your two cents! I know this lady personally,she was a big hustler,worked as HR for close to 10 years and she went to Canada and now she is always pushing deals in Zimbabwe. Her argument being it’s relatively easy to raise finance in diaspora but you will have to make money in Zimbabwe that is where the opportunities lie. Retired Procastinator

Uncle Tony

127,308 views • 2 years ago