Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Lindsay Clancy trial day 22 Instructions given to the jury BEFORE deliberations started. "During your deliberations, you must not communicate with or provide any information to anyone by any means about this case. You may not use any electronic device or media such as a computer or a phone...

10,759 просмотров • 8 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 22

Фото профиля Allan
Allan8 дней назад

So the nurses on the jury broke the rules?

Фото профиля Ivanka Gog
Ivanka Gog8 дней назад

How?

Фото профиля Allan
Allan7 дней назад

They went through the reports and described the different drugs and how they might interact. That's new information if the testimony didn't include it. They didn't read the testimony; they gave their thoughts.

Фото профиля Soule Soufflé
Soule Soufflé7 дней назад

@GogIvanka Opinions. They have their professional opinions. They were not vetted experts on the case. They could voice their opinion… but not inflict it on other jurors bc they “know better”. One of the wenches admitted the RNs tried to force others to accept their opinions

Фото профиля Allan
Allan7 дней назад

@GogIvanka I was an infantry soldier with hand-to-hand combat experience. If I were a juror and I spent time discussing the effort and time it takes to strangle a human and how they experienced it, would that be fair game?

Фото профиля Soule Soufflé
Soule Soufflé7 дней назад

@GogIvanka Discussing … not a cabal haranguing another to come to their prefab conclusion

Фото профиля Allan
Allan7 дней назад

@GogIvanka The alternates could hear them through the wall. Look, I surrender. You want women to be able to kill their kids. Post-birth abortion, whatever you want to call it. Nothing I say will make you not want her set free. When she rolls out, you'll celebrate. "We did it!"

Фото профиля Allan
Allan7 дней назад

@GogIvanka Meanwhile, she viciously killed three children. One by one. It takes over a minute to end their life that way. And they know Momma is doing something very, very wrong. Two of them could say something... if they didn't have a resistance band around their neck.

Фото профиля Donald Smith
Donald Smith8 дней назад

So the nurses on the jury weren’t supposed to reimagine the interpretation of the bloodwork. Told you so

Фото профиля Jason Stevens
Jason Stevens8 дней назад

Kellie was posting on Instagram. Kellie is also a nurse. Guess who else is a nurse? Deb Reddington.

Фото профиля Littlewalmartt
Littlewalmartt7 дней назад

Those instructions were not optional. The holdout juror did use his phone and, by his own spokesman’s account, Googled terms that had already been explained in court. That is the exact problem the judge was trying to prevent. A jury is supposed to decide from the evidence, not from a phone search mid-deliberation.

Фото профиля Graci_B
Graci_B8 дней назад

Yes, it’s clear, the judge instructed jurors not to use their phones to research the case. —The problem is the judge didn’t tell them not to use their phones at all during deliberations as required.

Фото профиля BO Jiden
BO Jiden7 дней назад

Yes and the other jurors were not allowed to testify and hold a toxicology semimar and claim expertise. No one was supposed to rule on social justice , womens rights and to send a message to womens heath care as they freely admitted . .

Фото профиля Dimon
Dimon8 дней назад

You’re so invested in this case it’s crazy. Treating a triple homicide of babies as if it’s a True Crime documentary and engagement bait.

Фото профиля Astrid
Astrid8 дней назад

It doesn’t say “don’t talk to anybody while you’re deliberating”. They weren’t allowed to talk about the case or look up evidence related to it. They WERE allowed to use their phones though.

Фото профиля BO Jiden
BO Jiden7 дней назад

But you get your panties bunched up because he got a definition . Which affected the other jurors in not one iota and would never be enough of a violation to derail..a verdict. It would have to be something that could reasonably affect the jury process. Degree matters in conduct

Фото профиля Charles Peligroso
Charles Peligroso8 дней назад

Read it again. It doesn’t say they can’t use a phone. Comprehension is hard.

Фото профиля J
J8 дней назад

Awesome, sounds like we should seize all their phones then.

Фото профиля IsThisRealLife
IsThisRealLife7 дней назад

Don't tell me he looked at his phone?

Фото профиля bernelle
bernelle8 дней назад

They were also sent home during deliberations and told not to read or watch it so everything in the deliberations were a mess.The judge should never have let them go home during deliberations.🙄

Фото профиля Cassandra
Cassandra8 дней назад

so what would have happened? a mis trial?

Фото профиля Steve Brown
Steve Brown8 дней назад

If he looked at his phone u must condone

Похожие видео

Candace is upset Charlie’s former head of security won’t respond to her messages, and she frequently does garbage like this—she’ll marvel at why so and so won’t respond to her messages or agree to speak to her. She doesn’t like it when she’s ignored or not given attention or taken seriously. She’ll attempt to manipulate her audience with the line of, “why wouldn’t they want to clear their name if they’re truly innocent?”—or something similar. But she neglects to acknowledge that people close to this case (and also the general public) are intimate with the fact that she’s a bad actor. She’s not presenting information in good faith, and talking to her or answering her questions to try to “clear your name” will not lead to any good. She doesn’t actually care about who she destroys in this faux investigation. If someone in an unofficial capacity were suggesting I had something to do with a murder, I’d just laugh, because it’s absurd. I wouldn’t desperately try to clear my name because I don’t have to, and it’s a waste of time. Candace, moreover, isn’t an investigator. She’s not part of this case in any capacity. And contrary to what she might fancy herself, she’s not the arbiter of who’s guilty and who’s suspicious and who’s not. No one is under any obligation to directly talk to her or respond to her requests for comment—and no one with any intelligence would.

Natalie Jean Beisner

45,993 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

This UK man is an absolute legend “I don't think in my country, believe me, every inch of this land is mine. My ancestors have lived here for over a thousand years. I don't believe in bending anything to newcomers. You've chosen to live in my country, you live by our ways. We have the right to intellectually criticize one another's faiths. As a Christian, I'm not intimidated by that. We've already gone through hundreds of years of doing this to ourselves. Christianity can stand up to it. Islam, by contrast, is pretty new to the world of getting criticized intellectually. It is absolutely right to criticize Muhammad, his conduct, his words, his right to criticize the Quran. And if you don't like that, go and live somewhere else. We will be better off without you in this country. I want a country that will destroy anyone who does not accept the terms that I offered. Any Islamist who tries to impose Sharia law, any Islamist who thinks that we're going to use violence because you criticized our Prophet or you criticized our book. I want a country that will destroy their lives. Take away their kids, chuck them in prison, stop them having jobs, move them out of the country. I do not want to tolerate any Muslim living in this country that does not accept the Christian heritage of this land and what comes with that. If you are willing to accept the Christian heritage of the nation, then there's a place for you. It's not just get rid of Muslims because they're Muslims. I don't give a sh*t about islamists. I think we need to ruin their lives. And anyone who even slightly hints at an islamist ideology should be dealt with mercilessly, ruthlessly. All right, are we clear about the term?”

Wall Street Apes

179,354 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

“You're not entitled to get what you want. I love you. You're entitled to earn what you're willing to go work for. And that's true in our families, in our parenting, in our marriage, in our companies, in society. If we want it, go earn it. If that's positivity, have positivity. I think and I am a positive person. I am jacked. I am excited. Obviously, you can feel my energy through technology here, I hope. Frankly, think positive people just need to get a lot stronger. I really do. I mean, I don't want to call them weak because people hear that differently but it kind of is. Look, if you want that positivity to stick, you’ve got to get tougher. Not sacrifice your love and your care and your empathy, but you got to get tough. And then we have to figure out how to love the people who are cynical because I don't think there's a ton of bad people in the world and I don't think there's a ton of bad people on teams. But I do think there are people who've been burned out. I do think there are people who have been through things in their lives. They've been through things in their company. They're experiencing stuff somewhere else. For whatever reason, they just kind of got run down and cynical and negative, or whatever. Or they're just wired a little different than we are. And I don't to hate on those people. I want to win those people. They don't have to be like me. They don't have to have my energy. But I want those people on my team. I want to love those people. And if eventually they choose that they don't believe in the same things that I believe in, I want to make it really clear and obvious that they don't want to be on this team because we're not about that. You know what I'm saying? I want it to be very easy, obvious, that, ‘Hey I should not be on this team. Because this team is full of very positive people who have great energy and talk to people, not about them.’ And we solve problems. We don't complain. We don't get defensive. We're real. I recognize I'm imperfect and I'm vulnerable to show you that about me. I want to be on that kind of a team. And if there's somebody who doesn’t believe in that stuff, I want to make it really easy for them to say, ‘Look, I don't want to be on this team. I don't wanna live like you guys live. I don't want do what you guys do.’ And then I really hope that that person leaves us and goes and joins our competitor.”

Brian Kight

38,031 просмотров • 2 лет назад