Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Lindsay Clancy’s attorney Kevin Reddington is arguing that prosecutors failed to present enough evidence to prove she killed her three children. Reddington pointed to what he called gaps in the police investigation, Clancy’s claim that she has no memory of the killings and questions about the timeline of events...

60,739 views • 4 days ago •via X (Twitter)

30 Comments

Franklin C Flint's profile picture
Franklin C Flint4 days ago

Didn't the defense go on the record and admitted she killed her children? Wasn't that a given from both sides from the very start?

rockinredeemer's profile picture
rockinredeemer4 days ago

Wait didn’t he just spend an entire trial arguing that she was under psychosis WHEN SHE KILLED HER KIDS?!?

pierrejock420's profile picture
pierrejock4204 days ago

If she has no memory of it, how can she remember the voices? Hence she can't try for NGRI.

Cowboy Politics Podcast -Unapologetic Conservative's profile picture
Cowboy Politics Podcast -Unapologetic Conservative4 days ago

Reddington is a liar and a leaker; he released the holdout jurors name and he needs to be held accountable.

𝙹𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚊 𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚔🐥𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐's profile picture
𝙹𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚊 𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚌𝚔🐥𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐4 days ago

Lindsay is full of shit. Her lawyer, Reddington is pure evil. The way he’s handling this case is an abomination.

Vladamir Untruksur's profile picture
Vladamir Untruksur4 days ago

except....she confessed and the physical evidence is overwhelming?

MiddleIsntBad's profile picture
MiddleIsntBad4 days ago

So all that time arguing she was in psychosis when she killed her kids was a lie as she never killed her kids Okey dokey

Tim Phares's profile picture
Tim Phares4 days ago

She admitted it; she just claims she was insane when she did it. Postpartum, remember. Reddington should be disbarred.

Truth's profile picture
Truth4 days ago

I recall during opening statements, Reddington acknowledged she did the crime and they offered the stipulation saying such.

Taran's profile picture
Taran4 days ago

CBS headline is entirely misleading the core facts at issue. Go figure

Shane Simmons's profile picture
Shane Simmons4 days ago

Reddington should probably stop taking his legal strategies from tik tok wine moms

# 00's profile picture
# 004 days ago

Why are we covering this travesty? Reddington is milking the system and should be held in contempt of court. His asinine Hail Mary defense now is and should be inadmissible. Moreover, this so-called "charlatan attorney" should be barred.

Lawrence_wxdude's profile picture
Lawrence_wxdude4 days ago

Bunch a hooie ……..OJ 2.0

Kelly's profile picture
Kelly4 days ago

If you actually watched the trial Reddington never admitted to Lindsay remembering doing this. They had her arrest warrant before she even woke from a coma. The police & drs told her she did it without even a proper investigation just Patrick’s word. We need a new system period

Felix Barajas®'s profile picture
Felix Barajas®4 days ago

These people live in a bizarro world up there.

WasatchMan's profile picture
WasatchMan4 days ago

That wasn't even the point of the trial. This guy is manipulator.

CLB's profile picture
CLB4 days ago

It’s no different than the trial, you clearly didn’t watch the full trial or comprehend it if you didn’t know that.

NoPurpleFood's profile picture
NoPurpleFood4 days ago

If he said that, he needs to be disbarred immediately. HE is the one who produced the Stipulation where she herself stipulated — agreed — that she k**led her babies. She signed it. He chose to do that rather than defend it…cuz it was indefensible. He needs to be sanctioned too.

Diamond Stone's profile picture
Diamond Stone4 days ago

Didn’t she admit to killing her children 🤷🏻‍♀️ WTH

Supercalafragilistic's profile picture
Supercalafragilistic4 days ago

Why did Reddington fight so hard in court trying to prove she was psychotic at the time of the murders if she didn't commit the murders? And is he trying to say that Patrick may have murdered their children and attacked Lindsay?? Reddington has quite literally lost the plot.

RigelDog's profile picture
RigelDog4 days ago

I’m dubious about the appropriateness of these defense arguments. He seems to want to argue that the WEIGHT of the evidence was insufficient, but that’s not the standard at this stage. He may argue that the evidence was legally insufficient, but that’s a much higher standard and rarely successful. He also can’t argue, at this stage, that there’s more, or new, evidence to be considered that was not introduced at trial.

Highrisk2291's profile picture
Highrisk22914 days ago

Well she did it so lock her up in jail now , get her out of the state hospital

Joseph Fosco's profile picture
Joseph Fosco4 days ago

🚨

Jim Jones's profile picture
Jim Jones3 days ago

So he will get his chance in court again. He should be sued for the slanderous way he openingly talked about the juror that voted guilty.

YNKS_5's profile picture
YNKS_53 days ago

Crazy that she killed her children, the defense attorney even stated that the first time, now he says there's "no evidence?" Welcome to a different dimension

BlackjackHawk (me/myself/I)'s profile picture
BlackjackHawk (me/myself/I)4 days ago

Fine tell it at the re-trial

YungBank's profile picture
YungBank4 days ago

The kids killed themselves? ok

RJC4614's profile picture
RJC46144 days ago

Reddington figuring out what plays well with his rabid fanbase on Facebook and Tik Tok. Hopefully a jury sees right through it.

MikeTheGreek's profile picture
MikeTheGreek4 days ago

Because he realized all the crazy broads out there that think Patrick Clancy did it. He probably figures he can get a jury full of those nut bags to let her walk ( lol ) out of that court completely free.

Swamp Green Uni 🐊💧's profile picture
Swamp Green Uni 🐊💧4 days ago

Did she not admit to killing them already??

Related Videos