Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Listen to this interview and hear Peter admit that while making Game Over, he wanted P-Square to change their style of music, while Paul believed that doing so would affect their musical brand. Jude then asked them to each pick five songs for the album. Peter didn’t like “Do...

133,154 Aufrufe • vor 11 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Do you know that at a point during the conflict between Peter, Paul and Jude, Paul told Peter something that Since he was always saying that his songs are not being accepted and that it is only Paul’s songs Jude takes, let them do it this way; For example, if P-Square wanted to release a 10-song album, Peter should contribute five songs and Paul also contribute five songs. Peter would write, compose and produce his five songs himself, and Paul would do the same with his. If Peter wanted Paul to feature on any of his songs, he could invite him. If Paul wanted Peter on any of his songs, he could also invite him. Either of them could also feature other artistes on their individual tracks. The songs would then be compiled and released as a P-Square album, keeping the brand intact. Their performances would also remain joint. If Peter got a show, he could call Paul, they perform together and share proceeds 50/50. If Paul got a show, same arrangement which is they perform together and share 50/50. Then comes the most important part which is about royalties. Each person would retain the copyright and royalties for the songs they individually created. So if Peter wrote and produced five songs, he earns the royalties from those five songs. If Paul wrote and produced five songs, he earns the royalties from his own. In other words, Peter would have the opportunity to create his own songs, produce them, release them under the P-Square brand, perform them as P-Square, and still earn directly from his work. Yet, according to Jude, Peter refused this arrangement. Now let me understand something. This is the same person who said he was being sidelined. The same person who complained that his songs were being rejected. Now you are being offered a structure where you can create your own songs, control your own production, choose your own features, release under the P-Square brand, perform as P-Square, and still keep your royalties. And you still say no? Why? What exactly was the problem with that arrangement?

The Ratel Nation

108,974 Aufrufe • vor 15 Tagen

VeryDarkMan has finally spoken on the ongoing P-Square disput£ concerning the sharing of royalties and assets earned from their music career. According to VDM, Peter Okoye, also known as Mr. P, reached out to him after an alleged alt£rc@ti0n. Peter claimed that Jude and Paul a$s@ult£d him in the house during an argument over their finances. Peter alleged that Jude and Paul have b£tr@y£d him for years. He stated that they have been s£lfishly appropriating all the money earned from music, while he received nothing, including properties. He also said they have cons!st£ntly mistr£at£d him and that he can no longer tol£rate it. He further claimed that the claim that he was given 30% is false, and that he was never given any money or properties VDM explained that he does not like to rely on one side of a story. Upon hearing Peter’s account, he immediately contacted Jude and Paul for their response. He said: Honestly, I can't pass judgment yet Jude, you are the eldest and you are not acting like it. The way you are tr£at!ng Peter shows that you know exactly what you are doing. I have now heard from all three of you. In my honest opinion, I'm not gonna judge yet but just speaking From my thoughts Jude and Paul need to do better and remember that Peter is your brother. Jude Paul are the problem.I have engaged my lawyer for further investigation. I'm not trying to support Peter. But Paul and Jude, I am giving you six hours to provide proof that you gave Peter his 30%. If you fail to do so, you should be held acc0untabl£, because you have wronged your brother grav£ly. It is time to face the cons£qu£nc£s. This is no longer a private matter. It is now a public issue. And Jude, if you come for me, you will r£gr£t it. I am waiting for your proof I have been watching all of these issues play out online, and I chose to remain silent. But now, it is time to speak up. Jude, let me be honest with you. You were not part of P-Square when they were struggling to build their career and make their money. Your role was to support them and help manage their finances as their elder brother. This money represents their hard work. It's not right for you to take 40%. Just because you're the elder brother should not give you the right to large share of what belongs to your younger brothers I think 10% should go for you after further investigation.

dangerous baby

249,796 Aufrufe • vor 20 Tagen