Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

🇱🇹🇱🇻🇷🇺⚡️ Lithuania is refusing to rule out a far more dangerous explanation for the mysterious drone shot down over Latvia: that the incident could have been part of a deliberate “false flag” operation designed to test NATO and manipulate attribution. Lithuanian Prime Minister Mindaugas Sinkevičius stressed that there is...

24,083 views • 9 days ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨🇱🇹🇱🇻🇵🇱🇪🇪🇷🇺 BREAKING | NATO countries bordering Russia are reinforcing critical infrastructure amid concerns that Moscow could stage a "false flag" operation using Ukrainian drones to test the alliance's response, according to Reuters. Lithuania has deployed troops to protect strategic energy infrastructure, including its LNG terminal, oil facilities, a major electricity connection with Poland, and the Kruonis pumped-storage hydroelectric plant. Latvia and Poland have also strengthened security around dams, gas facilities, and other critical energy infrastructure as concerns over potential Russian sabotage operations increase. Lithuania, Poland, Latvia, and Estonia have all warned about the possibility of Russian hybrid and sabotage operations targeting NATO territory. One scenario under consideration involves Moscow using captured or replicated Ukrainian drones in a false-flag operation designed to create ambiguity over responsibility and test how quickly and decisively NATO responds. The Kremlin has rejected the accusations, describing them as "scare stories" intended to justify further military buildup against Russia. The growing security measures demonstrate that NATO's northeastern members are increasingly preparing not only for conventional military threats, but also for deliberately ambiguous provocations designed to probe the alliance without immediately triggering a clear-cut collective military response. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

24,536 views • 13 days ago

"We are learning from Ukraine every day." – U.S. Secretary of Defense when asked whether American bases are protected against attacks similar to the SBU’s Operation Spiderweb. So, what can NATO learn from Ukraine when it comes to the use of and defense against drones? 🔳 Counter-drone defense According to Ukrainian military officials, no NATO army is currently prepared to withstand a mass drone assault. 🔳 Camouflaging weapons ▪️ Over years of war, Ukrainian Defenders have mastered concealing weapons near the front lines under tree cover and camouflage netting. ▪️ Ukraine’s military has also developed systems for jamming Russian signals and tracking enemy drones. ▪️ NATO is considering using drones as tools for early warning and border deterrence. ▪️ NATO countries bordering Russia have initiated the creation of a Baltic Drone Wall — a network of drones, sensors, jamming systems, and surveillance equipment. 🔳 Drone production ▪️ Ukraine has significantly ramped up its capabilities and plans to produce 5 million drones in 2025. ▪️ Within NATO, Germany is working closely with Ukraine on drone development. ▪️ The EU has also announced plans to strengthen its member states’ capacity to manufacture drones. 🔳 Frontline testing Drone prototypes in Ukraine are immediately sent into combat and tested against Russian capabilities. The data gathered is then directly used to refine drone manufacturing. 🔳 Drone pilot training ▪️ This year, NATO conducted extended simulation-based drone exercises. ▪️ NATO also has a training center in Poland to study and apply Ukrainian experience. ▪️ Denmark has sent its military personnel to Ukraine to learn drone warfare tactics firsthand. 📹: DW

Anton Gerashchenko

50,401 views • 1 year ago

I would like to remind you of several interesting factors about how Putin and Russia’s rhetoric about NATO has changed, as well as about Ukraine’s accession to NATO. In 2002, in Rome, when asked by a journalist about how Ukraine’s accession to NATO would affect relations between Russia and Ukraine, Putin replied that Ukraine is a sovereign state. And she herself has the right to freely choose her future, including the future of her security. And that Russia is not against if Ukraine and the Alliance decide that Ukraine will become a member of NATO. Now these liars are using NATO expansion as one of the reasons for their invasion. And this despite the fact that Ukraine has never been a member of this military bloc, and there were no plans to admit it there in the near future. And we all understand that all these reasons for the invasion are manipulation and lies in order to justify their aggression, terror and attempt to occupy Ukraine. Regarding the second part of the video, Putin says that NATO expansion is unacceptable in 2022. Some time later, when he is asked about Finland and Sweden joining NATO. He says he doesn't mind. NATO is the Defense Alliance. Even Article 5 of NATO implies collective security in the event of an attack on one of the Alliance countries. But this in no way obliges all NATO members to fight for a country that is itself an aggressor. Even if he is a member of NATO. Therefore, Putin’s manipulations that if Ukraine had joined NATO, it would have attacked Russia and started a war between NATO and Russia is a complete lie. Article 5 does not oblige one to fight for a side that itself is the aggressor. But only to protect a NATO member from attack and invasion by other countries. Against the backdrop of all this, all these fairy tales and Russian propaganda that Ukraine wanted to attack Russia is a lie. (I remind you that until 2014 Ukraine was not a member of NATO and there were no plans to admit it there, at least in the near future). And if Ukraine wanted to attack, why did it give up nuclear weapons? Why didn’t she carry out a massive militarization of the country, but, on the contrary, reduced the army? Why now, when the war is already going on, does Ukraine not enter Russian territory with its troops? After all, propaganda says that it was Ukraine that wanted to attack.

Igor Kyivskyi

226,429 views • 2 years ago

‼️‼️🇷🇺🇩🇪🇪🇪 BREAKING - A well-known German military analyst is predicting a possible Russian attack on Estonia by 2028 — Carlo Masala outlines how Russian aggression could escalate into a collapse of NATO. 📌 As global tensions continue to rise, Russia is steadily increasing the level of pressure and hostility toward its neighbors. 📌 In this context, German experts have expressed concern about Moscow’s plans, particularly regarding NATO’s collective defense obligations in Europe. German military analyst Carlo Masala noted that the Kremlin may attempt to exploit divisions within the Alliance to test NATO’s resolve. 📌 Masala suggests that Russia could launch an incursion into Estonia by 2028, using potential disagreements among NATO member states over the activation of Article 5. This article stipulates that “an attack on one NATO member state is considered an attack on all.” 📌 “The Russians are becoming increasingly brazen in the ways they test NATO’s deterrence measures and the ability of specific countries to respond,” Masala told Newsweek. “Their goal is to deepen fractures between European nations and NATO itself — we have already seen such provocations for two years now, but in recent months, Russia has clearly intensified its game. Nineteen drones entered Polish territory, and three fighter jets flew into Estonian airspace. They are taking far greater risks with their provocations.” 📌 The German expert argues that some countries may hesitate to engage in direct confrontation with Russia. Such hesitation, he warns, could embolden Putin to act aggressively without fearing consequences. Masala’s assessment corresponds with recent provocations, including the appearance of Russian troops near Estonia’s border and incursions into Estonian airspace — incidents that have heightened tensions and tested NATO’s unity. 📌 “If you believe in deterrence and in the idea that violations will be punished, you don’t send three fighter jets into Estonian airspace for twelve minutes just to test the reaction. You could do this with one aircraft — but not three,” he said. 📌 “In my view, this was a Russian PR stunt. If Moscow genuinely intended to create a real threat to Estonia, it wouldn’t parade seven soldiers carelessly through the streets like exposed targets. That is not preparation for an operation. It was a demonstration meant to convey: ‘We can do these things without fear of consequences.’” Masala concluded. See the latest updates with us: Visioner

Visioner

373,475 views • 8 months ago