Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🔥 LIVE ON GLOBAL VIEW : DEBBIE DE SOUZA! While Western activists protest a reality they’ve never lived, Venezuelans are celebrating freedom. On Global View, Debbie D'Souza explains why the fall of Nicolás Maduro is met with gratitude inside Venezuela and why so many abroad get it dangerously wrong!...

SimonaMangiante's profile picture

Simona Mangiante Papadopoulos

53,282 subscribers

16,427 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Tragic scenes last night in Southampton. I condemn that behaviour. Separately, I have a few points: - Why are people blaming Farage for people’s rage? Are they really that thick or is it desperation to score political points? People are raging, not because of Farage, but because they have had ENOUGH of what is happening in and to this country. - Why, when white working class people protest are they consistently met with batons, shields and provocative force? That doesn’t seem to happen as standard elsewhere (Harehills springs to mind) - Why do the police, given people are already furious with their actions, think it’s a good idea to repeatedly strike a lone individual - who is already prone on the ground - while another officer then moves to try and block the camera view?
0:19

Tragic scenes last night in Southampton. I condemn that behaviour. Separately, I have a few points: - Why are people blaming Farage for people’s rage? Are they really that thick or is it desperation to score political points? People are raging, not because of Farage, but because they have had ENOUGH of what is happening in and to this country. - Why, when white working class people protest are they consistently met with batons, shields and provocative force? That doesn’t seem to happen as standard elsewhere (Harehills springs to mind) - Why do the police, given people are already furious with their actions, think it’s a good idea to repeatedly strike a lone individual - who is already prone on the ground - while another officer then moves to try and block the camera view?

Michelle Dewberry

159,546 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

NEW CLIP: Kiss my feet, Prove your worth You’re back again, of course you are. Pathetic little wallet in hand, eyes glued to my sweaty feet after a brutal gym session. You didn’t earn this view. You never do. But I let you watch. Why? Because I like seeing you squirm. You obsess over every inch of my new gym set like it’s holy. It is. I wear it, so it’s worth more than you’ll ever be. Your only job? Fund it. Worship it. Then fall to your knees and thank me for the honor of licking my post-workout feet while I laugh at how desperate you are for crumbs of attention. You don’t get the gym. You don’t get the body. You definitely don’t get the girl. All you get is the chance to pay for the privilege of watching me enjoy it all without you. Available now on Loyal Fans.
0:16

NEW CLIP: Kiss my feet, Prove your worth You’re back again, of course you are. Pathetic little wallet in hand, eyes glued to my sweaty feet after a brutal gym session. You didn’t earn this view. You never do. But I let you watch. Why? Because I like seeing you squirm. You obsess over every inch of my new gym set like it’s holy. It is. I wear it, so it’s worth more than you’ll ever be. Your only job? Fund it. Worship it. Then fall to your knees and thank me for the honor of licking my post-workout feet while I laugh at how desperate you are for crumbs of attention. You don’t get the gym. You don’t get the body. You definitely don’t get the girl. All you get is the chance to pay for the privilege of watching me enjoy it all without you. Available now on Loyal Fans.

Empress Ivy Elite Findom 👸🏻

13,123 просмотров • 1 год назад

There are so many misconceptions about Tesla FSD, it can get out of hand sometimes. In reality, FSD is one of the most transformative technologies out there. With a single press of a button, it can drive you from point A to point B smoother than a human, all while being 9x safer. For some people, driving can be challenging due to anxiety or other issues. FSD cures that. It gives freedom back to people of all ages, most importantly the elderly. Autonomy is here, and it’s only getting better. When you buy a Tesla, you are buying a Personal Robotaxi. You won’t be able to live without it once you experience it on a daily basis.
0:18

There are so many misconceptions about Tesla FSD, it can get out of hand sometimes. In reality, FSD is one of the most transformative technologies out there. With a single press of a button, it can drive you from point A to point B smoother than a human, all while being 9x safer. For some people, driving can be challenging due to anxiety or other issues. FSD cures that. It gives freedom back to people of all ages, most importantly the elderly. Autonomy is here, and it’s only getting better. When you buy a Tesla, you are buying a Personal Robotaxi. You won’t be able to live without it once you experience it on a daily basis.

Nic Cruz Patane

28,180 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨SHOCKING FOOTAGE OUT OF UKRAINE Disturbing scenes are emerging that many are calling forced mobilization in real time; men being taken from their homes and dragged into a war they clearly want no part of. This video should make EVERYONE stop and pay attention. A man climbs onto his own roof… not to fix something… not to get a better view… but to ESCAPE. Why? Because authorities showed up at his home. Moments later, you see the confrontation unfold ON TOP OF THE HOUSE. A struggle. Chaos. No calm conversation. No voluntary compliance. He falls. He’s detained. And he’s taken away. Let that sink in. This isn’t a battlefield. This is a residential neighborhood. This is happening at someone’s HOME. ⚠️ And here’s where it gets even more disturbing: • Officials say it was a “document check” • Others say it’s aggressive conscription • The man clearly didn’t want to go So ask yourself: If everything is voluntary… why are people running? why are they climbing rooftops? why does it end in a physical struggle? This is what desperation looks like. Not headlines. Not press conferences. REALITY. 📢 Watch closely. Think critically. Ask questions.
0:18

🚨SHOCKING FOOTAGE OUT OF UKRAINE Disturbing scenes are emerging that many are calling forced mobilization in real time; men being taken from their homes and dragged into a war they clearly want no part of. This video should make EVERYONE stop and pay attention. A man climbs onto his own roof… not to fix something… not to get a better view… but to ESCAPE. Why? Because authorities showed up at his home. Moments later, you see the confrontation unfold ON TOP OF THE HOUSE. A struggle. Chaos. No calm conversation. No voluntary compliance. He falls. He’s detained. And he’s taken away. Let that sink in. This isn’t a battlefield. This is a residential neighborhood. This is happening at someone’s HOME. ⚠️ And here’s where it gets even more disturbing: • Officials say it was a “document check” • Others say it’s aggressive conscription • The man clearly didn’t want to go So ask yourself: If everything is voluntary… why are people running? why are they climbing rooftops? why does it end in a physical struggle? This is what desperation looks like. Not headlines. Not press conferences. REALITY. 📢 Watch closely. Think critically. Ask questions.

Jack Danger

32,243 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

But really. This is overwhelming. I can’t imagine what that must feel like. 50k is no small number. And that’s from one city. I completely understand yoongi crying back then bc of how big bts was getting. This type of pressure could crush anyone if they didn’t have the right support system. And we have seen this happen with a lot of artists. Just collapsing under the pressures of their fame and global reach. It’s what’s makes bts stand out I think. It’s the way they’re constantly and acutely aware of their impact. Humility runs in their veins. And never once have they ever taken even 1% of this global level phenomenon for granted. It’s so easy to get swept up in this type of power. So easy. We’ve seen empires fall bc of something like this. But BTS are just built different. They surround themselves and each other with unwavering support. They don’t fall complacent. Don’t let fame dampen their passion. They’ve never lost sight of what’s important. Never taken advantage of the love their fans have to give them. It’s why they feel different. It’s why their success feels monumental. It’s why people will always want to replicate everything about who they are or where they came from and their story of how they reached the top. Bc they think bts cracked the “formula” towards success. But there is no formula. No “science” behind it. Just an unexplainable truth that there are certain things in this world that come around but once in a lifetime. BTS are one of those things. Their groundbreaking success has no secret. No shortcuts. Just 7 separate lives that lined up perfectly on that one fateful day. That’s it. And the rest is Bangtan history.
0:17

But really. This is overwhelming. I can’t imagine what that must feel like. 50k is no small number. And that’s from one city. I completely understand yoongi crying back then bc of how big bts was getting. This type of pressure could crush anyone if they didn’t have the right support system. And we have seen this happen with a lot of artists. Just collapsing under the pressures of their fame and global reach. It’s what’s makes bts stand out I think. It’s the way they’re constantly and acutely aware of their impact. Humility runs in their veins. And never once have they ever taken even 1% of this global level phenomenon for granted. It’s so easy to get swept up in this type of power. So easy. We’ve seen empires fall bc of something like this. But BTS are just built different. They surround themselves and each other with unwavering support. They don’t fall complacent. Don’t let fame dampen their passion. They’ve never lost sight of what’s important. Never taken advantage of the love their fans have to give them. It’s why they feel different. It’s why their success feels monumental. It’s why people will always want to replicate everything about who they are or where they came from and their story of how they reached the top. Bc they think bts cracked the “formula” towards success. But there is no formula. No “science” behind it. Just an unexplainable truth that there are certain things in this world that come around but once in a lifetime. BTS are one of those things. Their groundbreaking success has no secret. No shortcuts. Just 7 separate lives that lined up perfectly on that one fateful day. That’s it. And the rest is Bangtan history.

Livheartt⁷ met hobi | ㉧㉣㉣ | 🦢🤍

56,739 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I just built a Meta Ads diagnostic in Claude Code that tells you WHY your account broke, not just what changed 🤯 It spins up a team of agents that each investigate a different reason performance dropped, then argue against each other to kill the wrong answer before it ever reaches you. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who panic-kill creative the second CPA spikes. If you've watched ROAS fall off a cliff and opened Ads Manager with ten tabs going, you already know what happens next. Your gut says "creative fatigue." You kill your best-performing ad. A week later performance is still broken, because that was never the problem. Guessing wrong is the most expensive move in paid social. This workflow ends the guessing: → One agent investigates each competing theory — creative fatigue, budget and delivery changes, traffic quality, offer and seasonality → Each one is blind to the others, reasoning only from its own slice of the data so they can't bias each other → A refuter agent then attacks every surviving theory and tries to kill it → A theory only stands if the data can't disprove it → You get a ranked diagnosis: the real cause, the evidence for and against it, and the one move to make this week No anchoring on the first obvious answer. No killing winning creative on a hunch. No "here's what happened" reports that never tell you why. What you get: → Every theory tested in parallel instead of one biased guess → An adversarial pass that kills the wrong answer before you act on it → A ranked diagnosis with confidence levels and evidence both ways → A reusable workflow you drop next month's export into and re-run Built 100% in Claude Code with the new dynamic workflows. The first account I ran it on looked like textbook creative fatigue. The workflow disagreed, and traced the real cause to a budget change that had doubled spend and flooded delivery with junk traffic. I put together a full playbook with the exact workflow, the prompt, and how to run it on your own account. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "META" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)
0:19

I just built a Meta Ads diagnostic in Claude Code that tells you WHY your account broke, not just what changed 🤯 It spins up a team of agents that each investigate a different reason performance dropped, then argue against each other to kill the wrong answer before it ever reaches you. All inside Claude Code. Perfect for DTC brands and agencies who panic-kill creative the second CPA spikes. If you've watched ROAS fall off a cliff and opened Ads Manager with ten tabs going, you already know what happens next. Your gut says "creative fatigue." You kill your best-performing ad. A week later performance is still broken, because that was never the problem. Guessing wrong is the most expensive move in paid social. This workflow ends the guessing: → One agent investigates each competing theory — creative fatigue, budget and delivery changes, traffic quality, offer and seasonality → Each one is blind to the others, reasoning only from its own slice of the data so they can't bias each other → A refuter agent then attacks every surviving theory and tries to kill it → A theory only stands if the data can't disprove it → You get a ranked diagnosis: the real cause, the evidence for and against it, and the one move to make this week No anchoring on the first obvious answer. No killing winning creative on a hunch. No "here's what happened" reports that never tell you why. What you get: → Every theory tested in parallel instead of one biased guess → An adversarial pass that kills the wrong answer before you act on it → A ranked diagnosis with confidence levels and evidence both ways → A reusable workflow you drop next month's export into and re-run Built 100% in Claude Code with the new dynamic workflows. The first account I ran it on looked like textbook creative fatigue. The workflow disagreed, and traced the real cause to a budget change that had doubled spend and flooded delivery with junk traffic. I put together a full playbook with the exact workflow, the prompt, and how to run it on your own account. Want it for free? > Like this post > Comment "META" And I'll send it over (must be following so I can DM)

Mike Futia

12,772 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Your body fat is a tank with a tap on it, and the tap narrows as the tank empties. - Plenty of fat: your body covers almost any deficit you ask it to - Getting leaner: it covers less each day - Properly lean: it covers very little, and the rest comes off the plate Which is why the first stone comes off while you barely notice, and the last one takes everything you have. So when you are lean, the shortfall has to arrive as food. And the industry hands you the wrong bag. Push the protein. Two hundred grams. Two fifty. Chicken breast on a kitchen scale. Past what you build with, protein is a fuel your liver has to strip the nitrogen off before you can use a calorie of it, and that machinery has a speed limit. So the extra hundred grams builds nothing and lifts nothing. Protein is what you build with. Fat and carbohydrate are what you lift with. Cut them both to make room for another shake and you have removed the thing that was moving the weight. Fat wins that choice. Twice the energy per gram. Leaves insulin alone, so the fat you are burning is not told to stay put every three hours. Keeps you full. And it is the same fuel your own stores are already releasing. Eat the fat. It is the one thing on the plate that matters more the leaner you get, and the first thing they told you to cut.
0:17

Your body fat is a tank with a tap on it, and the tap narrows as the tank empties. - Plenty of fat: your body covers almost any deficit you ask it to - Getting leaner: it covers less each day - Properly lean: it covers very little, and the rest comes off the plate Which is why the first stone comes off while you barely notice, and the last one takes everything you have. So when you are lean, the shortfall has to arrive as food. And the industry hands you the wrong bag. Push the protein. Two hundred grams. Two fifty. Chicken breast on a kitchen scale. Past what you build with, protein is a fuel your liver has to strip the nitrogen off before you can use a calorie of it, and that machinery has a speed limit. So the extra hundred grams builds nothing and lifts nothing. Protein is what you build with. Fat and carbohydrate are what you lift with. Cut them both to make room for another shake and you have removed the thing that was moving the weight. Fat wins that choice. Twice the energy per gram. Leaves insulin alone, so the fat you are burning is not told to stay put every three hours. Keeps you full. And it is the same fuel your own stores are already releasing. Eat the fat. It is the one thing on the plate that matters more the leaner you get, and the first thing they told you to cut.

Sama Hoole

23,427 просмотров • 5 дней назад

“Shokunin Spirit” & Trading Last year, while traveling, I saw a Japanese tour bus driver sitting in front of the wheels, carefully polishing them. He was waiting for his passengers and could have easily stayed on the bus to rest or play on his phone. But instead, he chose to clean the bus. At that moment, I understood why Japanese taxis and buses are always spotless and shining. That’s when I truly understood what “shokunin spirit” is all about—the dedication to excellence. I used to encourage people to aim for "financial freedom" or "F.I.R.E." as their goal when learning investing and trading. But in recent years, I’ve realized this approach is completely wrong because it puts the cart before the horse. Investing and trading are not easy. It takes more than just a few years to see results. It’s only those with a craftsman’s mindset—who are willing to constantly learn, refine their skills, and embrace challenges without focusing on immediate rewards—who have the best chance of succeeding. Financial freedom, in reality, is just a byproduct of this mindset. If your motivation is "financial freedom," it’s easy to feel frustrated and give up when progress is slow. But if you approach investing and trading with the craftsman spirit, you’ll see failures as part of the process and face them calmly, focusing on finding solutions instead of quitting. Successful traders (or entrepreneurs) don’t see "financial freedom" as their ultimate goal. Even after achieving it, their work and lifestyle often remain the same. What drives them is the craftsman spirit—the desire to keep excelling in the field they love and to push their boundaries. If you truly love your work and what you do, and you live each day fully, you don’t really need financial freedom. You’ve already found freedom in your mindset.
0:16

“Shokunin Spirit” & Trading Last year, while traveling, I saw a Japanese tour bus driver sitting in front of the wheels, carefully polishing them. He was waiting for his passengers and could have easily stayed on the bus to rest or play on his phone. But instead, he chose to clean the bus. At that moment, I understood why Japanese taxis and buses are always spotless and shining. That’s when I truly understood what “shokunin spirit” is all about—the dedication to excellence. I used to encourage people to aim for "financial freedom" or "F.I.R.E." as their goal when learning investing and trading. But in recent years, I’ve realized this approach is completely wrong because it puts the cart before the horse. Investing and trading are not easy. It takes more than just a few years to see results. It’s only those with a craftsman’s mindset—who are willing to constantly learn, refine their skills, and embrace challenges without focusing on immediate rewards—who have the best chance of succeeding. Financial freedom, in reality, is just a byproduct of this mindset. If your motivation is "financial freedom," it’s easy to feel frustrated and give up when progress is slow. But if you approach investing and trading with the craftsman spirit, you’ll see failures as part of the process and face them calmly, focusing on finding solutions instead of quitting. Successful traders (or entrepreneurs) don’t see "financial freedom" as their ultimate goal. Even after achieving it, their work and lifestyle often remain the same. What drives them is the craftsman spirit—the desire to keep excelling in the field they love and to push their boundaries. If you truly love your work and what you do, and you live each day fully, you don’t really need financial freedom. You’ve already found freedom in your mindset.

J Law

33,648 просмотров • 1 год назад

‼️An interesting interview with Lavrov Sergey Lavrov regularly gives interviews, and almost every one of them is an information operation designed to create an alternative reality. The March 26 interview with France Télévisions is no exception. Let's break it down and point out where there are lies and where there is manipulation. 1. Lavrov claims that Russia is supposedly defending international law while speaking in the "language of principles" regarding Iran. What's wrong: it's basic role reversal. Moscow is trying to speak from the position of a "guardian of the law," even though it is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the case of Iran, Lavrov is also deliberately omitting half the picture: yes, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, but Iran also faced non-proliferation concerns raised by the IAEA. Why it matters: It is an attempt to whitewash Russia's crimes through someone else's crisis and to present the aggressor (Russia) as the judge. 2. Russia does not provide Iran with intelligence; the coordinates of US bases are "already known to everyone." What's wrong: it's an evasive statement, not a complete refutation. There is no independently verified evidence of specific target marking data transfers in open sources, nor can there be, but the Kremlin's "we have nothing to do with it" claim has no basis for being automatically considered true. Why it matters: A typical Kremlin tactic - to deny anything that does not align with Russia's interests and to continue operating in a gray area. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have denied the US access to their airspace, so Russia is right about the "American venture." What's wrong: The caution of Gulf countries is real, but Lavrov turns it into a crude anti-Western caricature. Regional politics are more complex than the Kremlin's narrative that "everyone understands everything, only the US is pushing the world into chaos." Why it matters: The Kremlin takes a partial truth and builds a convenient political myth around it. 4. Russia isn't waging wars for its own gain; it's the US that wants to control the energy sector, the Strait of Hormuz, and the markets. What's wrong: It's pure projection. It is Russia that has used energy as a weapon for years, and after 2022, turned petrodollars into fuel for war. Why it matters: Moscow accuses others of doing what it does systematically - this is one of the central techniques of its propaganda. 5. Since 2014, Ukraine has been ruled by a "Nazi regime" that came to power through a coup. What's wrong: After Yanukovych fled, Ukraine held snap presidential elections, which the OSCE recognized as meeting international standards and being competitive. The claim of a "Nazi regime" is a political label, not a description of reality. Why it matters: "Nazism" in Kremlin rhetoric is a tool for dehumanizing Ukraine and justifying the war. 6. The Russian language is allegedly completely banned in Ukraine. What's wrong: Ukraine has strengthened the role of the state language, but this does not mean a total ban on Russian. The law does not apply to private communication and does not criminalize the everyday use of the language. Why it matters: The Kremlin is exaggerating language policy to the level of a "linguistic apocalypse" to sell the war as a supposed humanitarian mission. 7. Ukraine is allegedly at war with Orthodoxy and has "banned the canonical church." What's wrong: This is not about "banning a faith," but about a law regarding religious organizations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church. Even criticism from human rights activists does not support the Kremlin's claim of "persecution of Orthodoxy." Why it matters: Moscow is using the language of religious protection to cover up its network of influence in Ukraine. 8. The West allegedly cynically exploited the Minsk agreements as a respite to arm Ukraine. What's wrong: The Minsk process was collapsing because of the Kremlin's desire to use the agreements to establish de facto control over Ukraine, not because of some "cunning plot" by Paris and Berlin. Why it matters: The Kremlin is rewriting history retroactively to portray its own aggression as a supposedly forced response to "universal betrayal." 9. Russia does not attack civilians; its targets are solely facilities associated with the AFU. What's wrong: It's an outright lie. For years, the UN and independent sources have documented systematic Russian strikes on cities, residential areas, energy facilities, and civilian infrastructure. Why it matters: This is no longer just propaganda, but a cynical denial of documented terror against civilians. 10. The Bucha massacre is allegedly "not proven": there are no names, no evidence, and journalists haven't shown anything. What's wrong: This is one of the most mendacious claims. There are UN documents, testimonies, criminal investigations, identified suspects, and evidence of executions and killings of civilians. Why it matters: The Kremlin is not trying to refute the crime, but to wear down the audience with doubt and turn mass murder into "one of the versions." 11. Russia wants peace and negotiations. What's wrong: In the Kremlin's vocabulary, "peace" does not mean an end to aggression, but rather acceptance of its results. "Realities on the ground" means occupation; "root causes" means demanding recognition of Russia's right to punish neighbors for their political choices. Why it matters: Lavrov isn't offering peace. He's dressing up surrender in softer language. 12. Europe is supposedly dragging out the war, while Russia is looking for a solution. What's wrong: Russia started this war itself. European aid to Ukraine is a response to the aggression, not its cause. Why it matters: This is the main inversion of Kremlin logic - to make the audience forget who attacked first and shift the discussion from aggression to a "conflict that has dragged on too long." 13. RT and Sputnik are victims of censorship, and France has no right to speak about freedom of speech. What's wrong: RT and Sputnik were banned not as "ordinary media," but as state-run tools of disinformation. Their role as propaganda channels has been publicly acknowledged both in the EU and in France. Why it matters: The Kremlin wants to portray the defense of democracies against malicious information operations as a restriction of free speech. 14. France and Europe have made Russia an enemy; Moscow is merely reacting. What's wrong: The cause of the rift is not "Russophobia," but Russia's invasion, war crimes, blackmail, and influence operations against Europe. Why it matters: The Kremlin is systematically trying to reverse the cause-and-effect relationship: it is not that "Russia destroyed relations," but that "the West rejected Russia." 15. Individual real episodes - the tanker, incidents in France, disputes among allies - allegedly prove Western hypocrisy and justify Russia. What's wrong: Lavrov takes a real but local fact and uses it as a smokescreen. None of these incidents erases Russia's crimes or the very fact of its aggression. Why it matters: This is a favorite Kremlin method - using others' difficulties and whataboutism to cover up its own crimes.
0:10

‼️An interesting interview with Lavrov Sergey Lavrov regularly gives interviews, and almost every one of them is an information operation designed to create an alternative reality. The March 26 interview with France Télévisions is no exception. Let's break it down and point out where there are lies and where there is manipulation. 1. Lavrov claims that Russia is supposedly defending international law while speaking in the "language of principles" regarding Iran. What's wrong: it's basic role reversal. Moscow is trying to speak from the position of a "guardian of the law," even though it is waging an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the case of Iran, Lavrov is also deliberately omitting half the picture: yes, the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, but Iran also faced non-proliferation concerns raised by the IAEA. Why it matters: It is an attempt to whitewash Russia's crimes through someone else's crisis and to present the aggressor (Russia) as the judge. 2. Russia does not provide Iran with intelligence; the coordinates of US bases are "already known to everyone." What's wrong: it's an evasive statement, not a complete refutation. There is no independently verified evidence of specific target marking data transfers in open sources, nor can there be, but the Kremlin's "we have nothing to do with it" claim has no basis for being automatically considered true. Why it matters: A typical Kremlin tactic - to deny anything that does not align with Russia's interests and to continue operating in a gray area. 3. Saudi Arabia and the UAE have denied the US access to their airspace, so Russia is right about the "American venture." What's wrong: The caution of Gulf countries is real, but Lavrov turns it into a crude anti-Western caricature. Regional politics are more complex than the Kremlin's narrative that "everyone understands everything, only the US is pushing the world into chaos." Why it matters: The Kremlin takes a partial truth and builds a convenient political myth around it. 4. Russia isn't waging wars for its own gain; it's the US that wants to control the energy sector, the Strait of Hormuz, and the markets. What's wrong: It's pure projection. It is Russia that has used energy as a weapon for years, and after 2022, turned petrodollars into fuel for war. Why it matters: Moscow accuses others of doing what it does systematically - this is one of the central techniques of its propaganda. 5. Since 2014, Ukraine has been ruled by a "Nazi regime" that came to power through a coup. What's wrong: After Yanukovych fled, Ukraine held snap presidential elections, which the OSCE recognized as meeting international standards and being competitive. The claim of a "Nazi regime" is a political label, not a description of reality. Why it matters: "Nazism" in Kremlin rhetoric is a tool for dehumanizing Ukraine and justifying the war. 6. The Russian language is allegedly completely banned in Ukraine. What's wrong: Ukraine has strengthened the role of the state language, but this does not mean a total ban on Russian. The law does not apply to private communication and does not criminalize the everyday use of the language. Why it matters: The Kremlin is exaggerating language policy to the level of a "linguistic apocalypse" to sell the war as a supposed humanitarian mission. 7. Ukraine is allegedly at war with Orthodoxy and has "banned the canonical church." What's wrong: This is not about "banning a faith," but about a law regarding religious organizations linked to the Russian Orthodox Church. Even criticism from human rights activists does not support the Kremlin's claim of "persecution of Orthodoxy." Why it matters: Moscow is using the language of religious protection to cover up its network of influence in Ukraine. 8. The West allegedly cynically exploited the Minsk agreements as a respite to arm Ukraine. What's wrong: The Minsk process was collapsing because of the Kremlin's desire to use the agreements to establish de facto control over Ukraine, not because of some "cunning plot" by Paris and Berlin. Why it matters: The Kremlin is rewriting history retroactively to portray its own aggression as a supposedly forced response to "universal betrayal." 9. Russia does not attack civilians; its targets are solely facilities associated with the AFU. What's wrong: It's an outright lie. For years, the UN and independent sources have documented systematic Russian strikes on cities, residential areas, energy facilities, and civilian infrastructure. Why it matters: This is no longer just propaganda, but a cynical denial of documented terror against civilians. 10. The Bucha massacre is allegedly "not proven": there are no names, no evidence, and journalists haven't shown anything. What's wrong: This is one of the most mendacious claims. There are UN documents, testimonies, criminal investigations, identified suspects, and evidence of executions and killings of civilians. Why it matters: The Kremlin is not trying to refute the crime, but to wear down the audience with doubt and turn mass murder into "one of the versions." 11. Russia wants peace and negotiations. What's wrong: In the Kremlin's vocabulary, "peace" does not mean an end to aggression, but rather acceptance of its results. "Realities on the ground" means occupation; "root causes" means demanding recognition of Russia's right to punish neighbors for their political choices. Why it matters: Lavrov isn't offering peace. He's dressing up surrender in softer language. 12. Europe is supposedly dragging out the war, while Russia is looking for a solution. What's wrong: Russia started this war itself. European aid to Ukraine is a response to the aggression, not its cause. Why it matters: This is the main inversion of Kremlin logic - to make the audience forget who attacked first and shift the discussion from aggression to a "conflict that has dragged on too long." 13. RT and Sputnik are victims of censorship, and France has no right to speak about freedom of speech. What's wrong: RT and Sputnik were banned not as "ordinary media," but as state-run tools of disinformation. Their role as propaganda channels has been publicly acknowledged both in the EU and in France. Why it matters: The Kremlin wants to portray the defense of democracies against malicious information operations as a restriction of free speech. 14. France and Europe have made Russia an enemy; Moscow is merely reacting. What's wrong: The cause of the rift is not "Russophobia," but Russia's invasion, war crimes, blackmail, and influence operations against Europe. Why it matters: The Kremlin is systematically trying to reverse the cause-and-effect relationship: it is not that "Russia destroyed relations," but that "the West rejected Russia." 15. Individual real episodes - the tanker, incidents in France, disputes among allies - allegedly prove Western hypocrisy and justify Russia. What's wrong: Lavrov takes a real but local fact and uses it as a smokescreen. None of these incidents erases Russia's crimes or the very fact of its aggression. Why it matters: This is a favorite Kremlin method - using others' difficulties and whataboutism to cover up its own crimes.

Anton Gerashchenko

88,596 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Is This You Jack Posobiec Publicly Supporting a Future De Facto Theocratic MAGA Christian Integralism Nation? Two video clips for the price of one! Posobiec suggests replacing our Republic with a Theocracy—it appears the voice in the background is Steve Bannon! The integralist proposal disturbs many people (including Catholics) because integralists reject liberal freedom of religion and embraces religious coercion. Given the untoward implications of integralism, most familiar with the view set it aside on the basis of an argument like the following: 1) If integralism is true, religious coercion is not wrong. 2) But religious coercion is wrong. 3) Therefore, integralism is false. I don’t think integralism can be so easily dismissed. The reason is that integralism has a certain elegance and simplicity and even obviousness. It tells us that states should help people achieve their ultimate good. Besides feasibility worries, why wouldn’t this be the best thing for the state to do? Are non-integralists really asking the state to do less than the best? Doesn’t that just sound crazy when we state it openly? What anti-integralists need is a satisfying explanation as to why integralism is axiologically false. The anti-integralist need to explain why integralism has the wrong conceptions of value, reasons, and practical rationality. The more time I spent with their position, the harder I find it is to articulate attractive alternatives approaches that are compatible with Christian belief. I now think integralism can only be answered with some fundamental revisions to standard theistic ethical theories, in particular natural law theory and divine command theory. We need a theistic deontology, but one where side-constraints are grounded in the divine nature (most natural rights theorists ground rights in the divine nature only obliquely). I think I can convey the power of the integralist challenge by using an analogy with act-consequentialism in normative ethics (which holds that the right acts are those that maximize well-being). Integralism and act-consequentialism are simple, elegant theories with seemingly untoward implications, but they are so elegant that many theorists will adopt the view and simply accept the implications. And even good men will do so, like Peter Singer (a lead consequentialist) and Adrian Vermeule (a lead integralist). Written by Kevin Vallier 2019. Personally I want nothing more than for Turning Point USA to succeed. Clarification is needed as to why the organization actively promotes an individual that has a vision for America that is antithetical to our Constitution! Link to Vallier article in reply section.
0:17

Is This You Jack Posobiec Publicly Supporting a Future De Facto Theocratic MAGA Christian Integralism Nation? Two video clips for the price of one! Posobiec suggests replacing our Republic with a Theocracy—it appears the voice in the background is Steve Bannon! The integralist proposal disturbs many people (including Catholics) because integralists reject liberal freedom of religion and embraces religious coercion. Given the untoward implications of integralism, most familiar with the view set it aside on the basis of an argument like the following: 1) If integralism is true, religious coercion is not wrong. 2) But religious coercion is wrong. 3) Therefore, integralism is false. I don’t think integralism can be so easily dismissed. The reason is that integralism has a certain elegance and simplicity and even obviousness. It tells us that states should help people achieve their ultimate good. Besides feasibility worries, why wouldn’t this be the best thing for the state to do? Are non-integralists really asking the state to do less than the best? Doesn’t that just sound crazy when we state it openly? What anti-integralists need is a satisfying explanation as to why integralism is axiologically false. The anti-integralist need to explain why integralism has the wrong conceptions of value, reasons, and practical rationality. The more time I spent with their position, the harder I find it is to articulate attractive alternatives approaches that are compatible with Christian belief. I now think integralism can only be answered with some fundamental revisions to standard theistic ethical theories, in particular natural law theory and divine command theory. We need a theistic deontology, but one where side-constraints are grounded in the divine nature (most natural rights theorists ground rights in the divine nature only obliquely). I think I can convey the power of the integralist challenge by using an analogy with act-consequentialism in normative ethics (which holds that the right acts are those that maximize well-being). Integralism and act-consequentialism are simple, elegant theories with seemingly untoward implications, but they are so elegant that many theorists will adopt the view and simply accept the implications. And even good men will do so, like Peter Singer (a lead consequentialist) and Adrian Vermeule (a lead integralist). Written by Kevin Vallier 2019. Personally I want nothing more than for Turning Point USA to succeed. Clarification is needed as to why the organization actively promotes an individual that has a vision for America that is antithetical to our Constitution! Link to Vallier article in reply section.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

17,780 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

VIEWER DISCRETION STRONGLY ADVISED: Below, video of some of the Ukrainian prisoners from one of the most recent Russian counter offensive, about a few hours ago, in the Kursk region. Many more have been taken hostage and hundreds killed. DON’T get me wrong, some on the Russian side have also been taken hostage and killed, but Ukraine is just throwing these men into the fire like they’re worthless. It always starts like this. We saw it in #Mariupol, we saw it #Kupyansk, we saw it in #Soledar, #Bakhmut, and many other parts of the Donbas. Ukraine has yet to recapture anyone of these cities and towns that Russia took from them. In all these battles, western mercenaries fought side by side with Ukrainians against Russia. Only this time, they (western mercenaries) are more in number, for the battle of Kursk. In the end, these fathers and brothers and uncles will be sacrificed for the insatiably diabolical war appetite of the vampiric few in our midst. The madness just doesn’t end, until of course there’s an anti - war American president in the White House. That’s why many are praying for Trump to come. Hopefully the election holds and he wins, if they don’t rush America into a global war ahead of the elections like I have posited severally. We’ll see.
0:14

VIEWER DISCRETION STRONGLY ADVISED: Below, video of some of the Ukrainian prisoners from one of the most recent Russian counter offensive, about a few hours ago, in the Kursk region. Many more have been taken hostage and hundreds killed. DON’T get me wrong, some on the Russian side have also been taken hostage and killed, but Ukraine is just throwing these men into the fire like they’re worthless. It always starts like this. We saw it in #Mariupol, we saw it #Kupyansk, we saw it in #Soledar, #Bakhmut, and many other parts of the Donbas. Ukraine has yet to recapture anyone of these cities and towns that Russia took from them. In all these battles, western mercenaries fought side by side with Ukrainians against Russia. Only this time, they (western mercenaries) are more in number, for the battle of Kursk. In the end, these fathers and brothers and uncles will be sacrificed for the insatiably diabolical war appetite of the vampiric few in our midst. The madness just doesn’t end, until of course there’s an anti - war American president in the White House. That’s why many are praying for Trump to come. Hopefully the election holds and he wins, if they don’t rush America into a global war ahead of the elections like I have posited severally. We’ll see.

J. C. Okechukwu

17,208 просмотров • 2 лет назад

The k- drama We Are All Trying Here is a must watch I know some people will watch one episode and call it boring. Because It’s not fast paced. It’s slice of life in the most literal sense people sitting in rooms with their envy, their 20 year old dreams that never launched, their friends who made it while they didn’t. It’s quiet. It’s slow. It lingers on silences. But that’s exactly why it gutted me. Because this show understands the war you don’t talk about. The one where you open Instagram at 2am and feel like a failure. Where you’ve been “trying” for years and the world still doesn’t know your name. Hwang Dong-man, twenty years into film school, still no debut. Byeon Eun-ah, called “The Axe” because she has to kill other people’s dreams for a living. Everyone in this drama is carrying some private worthlessness, some comparison they can’t shake. It’s not entertaining in the way K-dramas usually are. It’s uncomfortable. It holds up a mirror to the parts of you that feel behind, bitter, unseen. But that’s why it’s so relatable. That’s why I think everyone should watch it. On the outside, life looks fine but inside, everyone is struggling in their own way. And I think that’s what makes it so relatable. We spend so much time pretending we’re fine, pretending we’re winning. We Are All Trying Here just. admits it. We’re all scared we’re wasting our lives. We are all anxious. We’re all trying here. And maybe that’s enough to start with. #Wearealltryinghere
0:14

The k- drama We Are All Trying Here is a must watch I know some people will watch one episode and call it boring. Because It’s not fast paced. It’s slice of life in the most literal sense people sitting in rooms with their envy, their 20 year old dreams that never launched, their friends who made it while they didn’t. It’s quiet. It’s slow. It lingers on silences. But that’s exactly why it gutted me. Because this show understands the war you don’t talk about. The one where you open Instagram at 2am and feel like a failure. Where you’ve been “trying” for years and the world still doesn’t know your name. Hwang Dong-man, twenty years into film school, still no debut. Byeon Eun-ah, called “The Axe” because she has to kill other people’s dreams for a living. Everyone in this drama is carrying some private worthlessness, some comparison they can’t shake. It’s not entertaining in the way K-dramas usually are. It’s uncomfortable. It holds up a mirror to the parts of you that feel behind, bitter, unseen. But that’s why it’s so relatable. That’s why I think everyone should watch it. On the outside, life looks fine but inside, everyone is struggling in their own way. And I think that’s what makes it so relatable. We spend so much time pretending we’re fine, pretending we’re winning. We Are All Trying Here just. admits it. We’re all scared we’re wasting our lives. We are all anxious. We’re all trying here. And maybe that’s enough to start with. #Wearealltryinghere

EdoQueen🌹

23,482 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Why Many Modern Women See Marriage as a Prison and Cooking/Cleaning as Slavery To understand why, take a close look at this type of woman. You can clearly see that she enjoys her current lifestyle….but why? Because she receives constant attention, has no real responsibility for anyone but herself, and no one holds her accountable or tells her what is right or wrong. She can wear whatever she wants, post thirst-trap content, date or sleep with whoever she chooses, and even sell her body if she wants. Cooking and cleaning are optional, not mandatory, so laziness is easy to justify. Comfort becomes the priority. One thing modern women dislike in life is change, and change requires self-reflection and accountability….two things that are uncomfortable. When a woman like this gets married, everything changes. She can no longer live the same way. She has to dress more modestly, stop seeking attention online, and give up behavior that disrespects the marriage. Marriage introduces responsibility…often for the first time in her life. She now has to consider her husband’s feelings before making decisions. Cooking and cleaning are no longer optional; they become responsibilities tied to maintaining a household. She must wake up early, raise children, prepare them for school, and put someone else’s needs ahead of her own. The problem is that many women were never mentally, emotionally, or practically trained for this role. They were not taught discipline, sacrifice, or service by their mothers. Instead, they were raised to prioritize freedom, comfort, and personal gratification above all else. When someone raised for comfort is placed into a life that requires sacrifice, structure, and accountability, unhappiness is almost guaranteed. Marriage exposes what freedom hides: a lack of preparation for responsibility. This is why the expansion of unchecked freedom…without responsibility or role training….has coincided with declining marriage and birth rates. Comfort was promised, but comfort is never guaranteed in life. Stability, family, and legacy require effort, discipline, and sacrifice…values that many modern women were never taught to embrace.
0:11

Sensitive content

Why Many Modern Women See Marriage as a Prison and Cooking/Cleaning as Slavery To understand why, take a close look at this type of woman. You can clearly see that she enjoys her current lifestyle….but why? Because she receives constant attention, has no real responsibility for anyone but herself, and no one holds her accountable or tells her what is right or wrong. She can wear whatever she wants, post thirst-trap content, date or sleep with whoever she chooses, and even sell her body if she wants. Cooking and cleaning are optional, not mandatory, so laziness is easy to justify. Comfort becomes the priority. One thing modern women dislike in life is change, and change requires self-reflection and accountability….two things that are uncomfortable. When a woman like this gets married, everything changes. She can no longer live the same way. She has to dress more modestly, stop seeking attention online, and give up behavior that disrespects the marriage. Marriage introduces responsibility…often for the first time in her life. She now has to consider her husband’s feelings before making decisions. Cooking and cleaning are no longer optional; they become responsibilities tied to maintaining a household. She must wake up early, raise children, prepare them for school, and put someone else’s needs ahead of her own. The problem is that many women were never mentally, emotionally, or practically trained for this role. They were not taught discipline, sacrifice, or service by their mothers. Instead, they were raised to prioritize freedom, comfort, and personal gratification above all else. When someone raised for comfort is placed into a life that requires sacrifice, structure, and accountability, unhappiness is almost guaranteed. Marriage exposes what freedom hides: a lack of preparation for responsibility. This is why the expansion of unchecked freedom…without responsibility or role training….has coincided with declining marriage and birth rates. Comfort was promised, but comfort is never guaranteed in life. Stability, family, and legacy require effort, discipline, and sacrifice…values that many modern women were never taught to embrace.

STUNNER

11,818 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

One of the wildest things to witness as a White House correspondent… Today I was in the presidential motorcade traveling with the press pool from the White House to Joint Base Andrews as President Donald J. Trump departed for Florida. When the President moves, Washington, D.C. transforms instantly. Entire parkways, intersections, and highway ramps shut down so the motorcade can move FAST and secure across the city. A small group of Pool reporters ride in a black press van inside the motorcade so we can witness the departure firsthand. And something you don’t always see on TV — today there were kids, families, and people along the street waving, filming, and cheering as the motorcade passed. Then comes the moment on the runway. You watch the President walk across the tarmac and board. And no matter how many times you see that aircraft up close — the scale, the engines, the history — it never stops being impressive. One of those moments where you pause and think… this job is pretty incredible.
0:17

One of the wildest things to witness as a White House correspondent… Today I was in the presidential motorcade traveling with the press pool from the White House to Joint Base Andrews as President Donald J. Trump departed for Florida. When the President moves, Washington, D.C. transforms instantly. Entire parkways, intersections, and highway ramps shut down so the motorcade can move FAST and secure across the city. A small group of Pool reporters ride in a black press van inside the motorcade so we can witness the departure firsthand. And something you don’t always see on TV — today there were kids, families, and people along the street waving, filming, and cheering as the motorcade passed. Then comes the moment on the runway. You watch the President walk across the tarmac and board. And no matter how many times you see that aircraft up close — the scale, the engines, the history — it never stops being impressive. One of those moments where you pause and think… this job is pretty incredible.

Cara Castronuova

445,447 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🇺🇸 🇻🇪 VENEZUELA'S BUILDINGS DIDN'T JUST FALL. THEY WERE NEVER BUILT TO STAND! Over 1,450 dead. Thousands still missing. Buildings pancaked flat like decks of cards in a hurricane. This wasn't just a natural disaster. It was decades of socialist corruption meeting a 7.5 magnitude reckoning. Experts confirm it: substandard construction, weak building code enforcement, informal housing thrown up fast during oil booms with zero accountability. The CSIS put it plainly - "weak enforcement of building codes and the prevalence of informal construction made many structures woefully underprepared." Maduro's regime hollowed out the very institutions that should have kept people safe. The military, the engineers, the inspectors, all rotted from the inside out by corruption and politics. And now the Venezuelan people are digging through rubble with their bare hands. Here's what real leadership looks like: while Maduro sits in a Brooklyn jail cell sending social media prayers, U.S. Marines are at the Port of La Guaira delivering aid. 100 U.S. Air Force airmen are repairing the airport so relief planes can land. Venezuelans on the street are shouting "USA, thank you!" America shows up. Socialism always falls down. This is what 25 years of Chavismo built - towers that turned into tombstones the moment the ground shook. You cannot separate the rubble from the regime that created it. Prayers for the Venezuelan people. And a lesson the left refuses to learn.
0:13

🇺🇸 🇻🇪 VENEZUELA'S BUILDINGS DIDN'T JUST FALL. THEY WERE NEVER BUILT TO STAND! Over 1,450 dead. Thousands still missing. Buildings pancaked flat like decks of cards in a hurricane. This wasn't just a natural disaster. It was decades of socialist corruption meeting a 7.5 magnitude reckoning. Experts confirm it: substandard construction, weak building code enforcement, informal housing thrown up fast during oil booms with zero accountability. The CSIS put it plainly - "weak enforcement of building codes and the prevalence of informal construction made many structures woefully underprepared." Maduro's regime hollowed out the very institutions that should have kept people safe. The military, the engineers, the inspectors, all rotted from the inside out by corruption and politics. And now the Venezuelan people are digging through rubble with their bare hands. Here's what real leadership looks like: while Maduro sits in a Brooklyn jail cell sending social media prayers, U.S. Marines are at the Port of La Guaira delivering aid. 100 U.S. Air Force airmen are repairing the airport so relief planes can land. Venezuelans on the street are shouting "USA, thank you!" America shows up. Socialism always falls down. This is what 25 years of Chavismo built - towers that turned into tombstones the moment the ground shook. You cannot separate the rubble from the regime that created it. Prayers for the Venezuelan people. And a lesson the left refuses to learn.

Bill Mitchell

19,521 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇬🇪 Tbilisi tonight — special forces used water cannons, yet the crowd refuses to leave. Masked rioters, waving EU and Ukrainian flags, torch chairs and tables outside Georgia’s Presidential Palace. And like clockwork, Western media will call it a “pro-democracy protest.” But we’ve seen this movie before. The same tired playbook... Kiev, 2014. Chisinau, last Sunday. Every time a sovereign nation refuses to kneel before Brussels, London, or Washington, chaos suddenly erupts on cue. That's how the tired hybrid warfare aka color revolution playbook works for the West Meanwhile, Georgia’s ruling party, Georgian Dream, is winning over 70% of the vote nationwide. The people have spoken — clearly, decisively, for sovereignty, stability, and dignity. But to the EU, that’s heresy. How dare Georgians elect the wrong party! You can vote again, as many times as it takes to get it "right" — is the message from Brussels. The desperation is palpable. The Western project in Eurasia is collapsing under its own hypocrisy, preaching democracy while punishing anyone who actually practices it. What we’re witnessing in Tbilisi isn’t a spontaneous uprising, it’s a tantrum from the empire of NGOs, foreign agents, and media propagandists who cannot stomach that the world has changed. From Georgia to Serbia, Hungary to Slovakia, a new axis of real sovereignty is emerging, nations unafraid to say no to dictates from abroad and yes to their own people. These so-called “rogue” states are not the problem. They are the antidote. And God forbid, when other smaller nations see there is hope, that is what is keeping the Empire up at night. Because when even small nations rediscover their courage, the whole facade of Western control begins to crumble. And that’s what terrifies Brussels the most.
0:19

🇬🇪 Tbilisi tonight — special forces used water cannons, yet the crowd refuses to leave. Masked rioters, waving EU and Ukrainian flags, torch chairs and tables outside Georgia’s Presidential Palace. And like clockwork, Western media will call it a “pro-democracy protest.” But we’ve seen this movie before. The same tired playbook... Kiev, 2014. Chisinau, last Sunday. Every time a sovereign nation refuses to kneel before Brussels, London, or Washington, chaos suddenly erupts on cue. That's how the tired hybrid warfare aka color revolution playbook works for the West Meanwhile, Georgia’s ruling party, Georgian Dream, is winning over 70% of the vote nationwide. The people have spoken — clearly, decisively, for sovereignty, stability, and dignity. But to the EU, that’s heresy. How dare Georgians elect the wrong party! You can vote again, as many times as it takes to get it "right" — is the message from Brussels. The desperation is palpable. The Western project in Eurasia is collapsing under its own hypocrisy, preaching democracy while punishing anyone who actually practices it. What we’re witnessing in Tbilisi isn’t a spontaneous uprising, it’s a tantrum from the empire of NGOs, foreign agents, and media propagandists who cannot stomach that the world has changed. From Georgia to Serbia, Hungary to Slovakia, a new axis of real sovereignty is emerging, nations unafraid to say no to dictates from abroad and yes to their own people. These so-called “rogue” states are not the problem. They are the antidote. And God forbid, when other smaller nations see there is hope, that is what is keeping the Empire up at night. Because when even small nations rediscover their courage, the whole facade of Western control begins to crumble. And that’s what terrifies Brussels the most.

THE ISLANDER

24,543 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

🚨 STARMER’S WAR ON FREE SPEECH: WHY HE WANTS X SILENCED AND BRITAIN CONTROLLED Keir Starmer’s government is rapidly becoming one of the most despised in modern British history — and for good reason. This is not a cabinet that rose on hope. It is a cabinet that rose on fear, censorship, and managed decline. In just a short time, Starmer’s Labour government has managed to alienate almost every pillar of British society: Working people crushed by taxes and energy costs. Farmers facing land grabs and inheritance raids. Veterans watching Britain give up strategic territory. Families struggling while billions are sent abroad. And citizens silenced for daring to speak out. This is not incompetence. It is ideology. Starmer governs as if Britain is an obstacle to be managed, not a nation to be defended. His cabinet speaks the language of global institutions, not the language of the British people. They treat borders as optional, sovereignty as outdated, and free speech as dangerous. And nothing exposes that more clearly than their obsession with shutting down X. They do not fear “misinformation.” They fear information. X is one of the last platforms where ordinary people can still challenge power in real time — where whistleblowers, journalists, dissidents and citizens can bypass the gatekeepers of the BBC, the Guardian, and the permanent political class. That is why Starmer wants it controlled, regulated, or banned. Because control of speech is control of reality. The same government that is prepared to hand away the Chagos Islands, weaken Britain’s strategic position, and bend to foreign pressure now wants to decide what you are allowed to read, say, and share. They are not governing. They are managing decline. They are not protecting democracy. They are containing it. And the public knows it. Polls show historic distrust. Protests are growing. Support is evaporating. Starmer’s cabinet is not unpopular because it failed to communicate. It is unpopular because people can see exactly what it is doing. And what it is doing to Britain is unforgivable.
0:13

🚨 STARMER’S WAR ON FREE SPEECH: WHY HE WANTS X SILENCED AND BRITAIN CONTROLLED Keir Starmer’s government is rapidly becoming one of the most despised in modern British history — and for good reason. This is not a cabinet that rose on hope. It is a cabinet that rose on fear, censorship, and managed decline. In just a short time, Starmer’s Labour government has managed to alienate almost every pillar of British society: Working people crushed by taxes and energy costs. Farmers facing land grabs and inheritance raids. Veterans watching Britain give up strategic territory. Families struggling while billions are sent abroad. And citizens silenced for daring to speak out. This is not incompetence. It is ideology. Starmer governs as if Britain is an obstacle to be managed, not a nation to be defended. His cabinet speaks the language of global institutions, not the language of the British people. They treat borders as optional, sovereignty as outdated, and free speech as dangerous. And nothing exposes that more clearly than their obsession with shutting down X. They do not fear “misinformation.” They fear information. X is one of the last platforms where ordinary people can still challenge power in real time — where whistleblowers, journalists, dissidents and citizens can bypass the gatekeepers of the BBC, the Guardian, and the permanent political class. That is why Starmer wants it controlled, regulated, or banned. Because control of speech is control of reality. The same government that is prepared to hand away the Chagos Islands, weaken Britain’s strategic position, and bend to foreign pressure now wants to decide what you are allowed to read, say, and share. They are not governing. They are managing decline. They are not protecting democracy. They are containing it. And the public knows it. Polls show historic distrust. Protests are growing. Support is evaporating. Starmer’s cabinet is not unpopular because it failed to communicate. It is unpopular because people can see exactly what it is doing. And what it is doing to Britain is unforgivable.

Jim Ferguson

57,442 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад