正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

locking in for a 14hr opus 4.5 session

near

94,697 subscribers

30,615 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Claude Opus 4.5 For Polymarket Is a Cheat Code

Claude Opus 4.5 For Polymarket Is a Cheat Code

Moon Dev

234,670 次观看 • 7 个月前

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

OPUS 4.6 WAS NERFED DUE TO DEMAND BUT OPUS 4.5 DOES NOT SEEM TO BE HIT this guy ran the same test on both models. Opus 4.6 fails consistently but Opus 4.5 passes every time he switched back to Opus 4.5 on Claude Code and said "what a difference, feels like i got Opus back finally" he is now using this test as a "quantization canary" that runs it at the start of every session before doing real work. if it fails, the model is degraded. five Opus 4.6 windows in a row failed the untransparent nerfing is pushing people to cancel their Max plans if you've been feeling like Opus got dumber lately, you're not imagining it i'd suggest switching to Opus 4.5 to see the difference for yourself

Om Patel

695,562 次观看 • 3 个月前

Opus 4.5 in-a-loop builds Spiking Neural Net simulations in Cursor that is all :)

Opus 4.5 in-a-loop builds Spiking Neural Net simulations in Cursor that is all :)

echo.hive

42,700 次观看 • 6 个月前

How much better is Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic vs. past models? We compared Opus 4.6 to Opus 4.5 on a set of challenging SVG generations in Code Arena:

How much better is Claude Opus 4.6 by Anthropic vs. past models? We compared Opus 4.6 to Opus 4.5 on a set of challenging SVG generations in Code Arena:

Arena.ai

58,591 次观看 • 5 个月前

racing Opus 4.6 against 4.5 to max out a Runescape account

racing Opus 4.6 against 4.5 to max out a Runescape account

max

1,390,259 次观看 • 5 个月前

Say hello to @ClaudeAI in Azure 👋 Starting today, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Haiku 4.5, and Opus 4.1 models are available in Microsoft Foundry.

Say hello to @ClaudeAI in Azure 👋 Starting today, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Haiku 4.5, and Opus 4.1 models are available in Microsoft Foundry.

Microsoft Azure

158,217 次观看 • 7 个月前

Claude Opus 4.5 wrote a Pixar's OpenUSD crate file parser in plain JavaScript so you don't have to.

Claude Opus 4.5 wrote a Pixar's OpenUSD crate file parser in plain JavaScript so you don't have to.

mrdoob

76,299 次观看 • 6 个月前

Claude Opus 4.5 is now rolling out to GitHub Copilot in public preview, and will be available at a promotional 1x premium request multiplier through December 5! 🙌 Early testing shows Claude Opus 4.5 👀 - Surpassed internal coding benchmarks, while cutting token usage in half - Is great for code migration and code refactoring See it in action, and try it for yourself.

Claude Opus 4.5 is now rolling out to GitHub Copilot in public preview, and will be available at a promotional 1x premium request multiplier through December 5! 🙌 Early testing shows Claude Opus 4.5 👀 - Surpassed internal coding benchmarks, while cutting token usage in half - Is great for code migration and code refactoring See it in action, and try it for yourself.

GitHub

217,344 次观看 • 7 个月前

GPT 5.2 is "ridiculously better" than Opus 4.5 they said... I tested BOTH on identical bugs in OpenCode and recorded everything GPT 5.2 → 24 minutes for nothing Opus 4.5 → 4 minutes and done Full video proof (crazy) Always test yourself instead of trusting tweets

GPT 5.2 is "ridiculously better" than Opus 4.5 they said... I tested BOTH on identical bugs in OpenCode and recorded everything GPT 5.2 → 24 minutes for nothing Opus 4.5 → 4 minutes and done Full video proof (crazy) Always test yourself instead of trusting tweets

Melvyn • Builder

393,519 次观看 • 5 个月前

Our engineers have found that Opus 4.5 handles ambiguity and reasons about tradeoffs without hand-holding. When pointed at a complex, multi-system bug, it figures out the fix. Overall, Opus 4.5 just "gets it."

Our engineers have found that Opus 4.5 handles ambiguity and reasons about tradeoffs without hand-holding. When pointed at a complex, multi-system bug, it figures out the fix. Overall, Opus 4.5 just "gets it."

Claude

910,923 次观看 • 7 个月前

Opus 4.5 is absolutely goated. I built AN ENTIRE VIDEO EDITING APPLICATION FOR WINDOWS IN ABOUT AN HOUR. No tricks. No special prompts, no prompt driven dev. Just me, Visual Studio Code, and Opus 4.5 having a convo via the mic. I feel like this is what we were promised, and it's here.

Opus 4.5 is absolutely goated. I built AN ENTIRE VIDEO EDITING APPLICATION FOR WINDOWS IN ABOUT AN HOUR. No tricks. No special prompts, no prompt driven dev. Just me, Visual Studio Code, and Opus 4.5 having a convo via the mic. I feel like this is what we were promised, and it's here.

Burke Holland

124,377 次观看 • 7 个月前

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

Grok 4.5 operates at Opus-level intelligence and Sonnet-level pricing! We tested it against Claude Opus 4.8, Sonnet 5, and GLM 5.2 on a SpaceX mission: liftoff, stage sep, orbit insertion, satellite deploy. Grok 4.5 animates it more accurately and vividly than Sonnet 5 and GLM 5.2. Opus is the fastest and most expensive. Grok burns more tokens but still lands ~40% cheaper than Opus, and a bit under Sonnet 5. Time / tokens / cost: Grok 4.5 — / 35k / $0.69 Opus 4.8 — / 13.7k / $1.10 Sonnet 5 — / 22.1k / $0.78 GLM 5.2 — / 92.7k / $0.13 yet GLM did the whole mission for $0.13 😮

GMI Cloud

148,431 次观看 • 3 天前

Opus 4.5 is insane. Just shipped v2 of my compounding engineering plugin—watch the video for my full thoughts on the model. Compounding engineering plugin v2: This wouldn't have worked a week ago. Previous models would derail after the second parallel thread. Opus 4.5 held the context, made the right decisions, and shipped clean pull requests to both repos. New in the plugin: codify command (captures learnings automatically), updated plan mode, better prompting patterns for Opus 4.5's strengths. If you're coding with Claude, this is your new daily driver.

Opus 4.5 is insane. Just shipped v2 of my compounding engineering plugin—watch the video for my full thoughts on the model. Compounding engineering plugin v2: This wouldn't have worked a week ago. Previous models would derail after the second parallel thread. Opus 4.5 held the context, made the right decisions, and shipped clean pull requests to both repos. New in the plugin: codify command (captures learnings automatically), updated plan mode, better prompting patterns for Opus 4.5's strengths. If you're coding with Claude, this is your new daily driver.

Kieran Klaassen

182,734 次观看 • 7 个月前

Web Design Royal Rumble! Claude Code with: - GLM 4.7 (left) - Opus 4.5 (center) - MiniMax M2.1 (right) 🥇 M2.1 fastest 🥈 Opus 4.5 🥉 GLM 4.7 All great, which one is the best? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Web Design Royal Rumble! Claude Code with: - GLM 4.7 (left) - Opus 4.5 (center) - MiniMax M2.1 (right) 🥇 M2.1 fastest 🥈 Opus 4.5 🥉 GLM 4.7 All great, which one is the best? 🤷🏻‍♂️

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

91,414 次观看 • 6 个月前

If you paid for Opus 4.5 using API This costs $3.43 to build And it just took like 10mins

If you paid for Opus 4.5 using API This costs $3.43 to build And it just took like 10mins

Melvin Vivas

270,204 次观看 • 7 个月前

I've been trying to move from imperative prompting to declarative prompting. • Imperative prompting: I tell the agent how to do something. • Declarative prompting: I describe my goal to the agent. This was impossible before, but since Opus 4.5, I'm letting models fill in the blanks more and more. I recorded a video using Quest + Opus 4.5. This is a coding agent designed specifically for this purpose.

I've been trying to move from imperative prompting to declarative prompting. • Imperative prompting: I tell the agent how to do something. • Declarative prompting: I describe my goal to the agent. This was impossible before, but since Opus 4.5, I'm letting models fill in the blanks more and more. I recorded a video using Quest + Opus 4.5. This is a coding agent designed specifically for this purpose.

Santiago

96,471 次观看 • 5 个月前

Anthropic engineer: "Fable is one of those models you’ll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. We just removed 80% of Claude Code’s system prompt. A new class of models wants a smaller prompt." in 20-minute session, an Anthropic core engineer reveals the capabilities of Fable. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below.

Anthropic engineer: "Fable is one of those models you’ll just remember - like Sonnet 3.5, Opus 4, Opus 4.5. We just removed 80% of Claude Code’s system prompt. A new class of models wants a smaller prompt." in 20-minute session, an Anthropic core engineer reveals the capabilities of Fable. Watch it now, then read how to use this frontier model in the article below.

Movez

547,840 次观看 • 11 天前

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!

MiniMax M2.1 vs Opus 4.5 vs GLM-4.7 built an interactive 3D solar system from scratch. Running on 3 Claude Code in parallel. The winner is: 🥇 GLM-4.7! 🥈 Opus 4.5 (slowest) 🥉 M2.1 (fastest) GLM-4.7 design capabilities are another level vs 4.6!

Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ

81,630 次观看 • 6 个月前

One example of something I couldn't believe Claude Opus 4.5 could generate until it did: a full-on MIDI mixer as a terminal app, written in Rust.

One example of something I couldn't believe Claude Opus 4.5 could generate until it did: a full-on MIDI mixer as a terminal app, written in Rust.

Max Woolf

793,342 次观看 • 6 个月前

A Session With @thebhimband.🔥 Locking in The Sound And Energy for BHIMFEST'25 ACCRA SPORTS STADIUM | 24. DEC. 2025 | *714*2025# #BHIMFEST25 #BhimFestAt10

A Session With @thebhimband.🔥 Locking in The Sound And Energy for BHIMFEST'25 ACCRA SPORTS STADIUM | 24. DEC. 2025 | 7142025# #BHIMFEST25 #BhimFestAt10

THE TORCHER

42,242 次观看 • 6 个月前