正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Looks almost competitive until you consider subsidization

22,432 次观看 • 16 小时前 •via X (Twitter)

18 条评论

Ash 的头像
Ash16 小时前

It's more likely to be the same subzidiation as Gemini 3.8 Flash, it's unfair to compare with Argon subzidiation

João Alves 的头像
João Alves15 小时前

Subsidization in a Google AI plan: 4 additional accounts (up to 5x usage, if you have 5 Google accounts), YouTube Premium Lite (or Premium with a little extra cost), 5 TB of storage on Google Drive, unlimited enhanced Google AI Search, bigger limits on Gemini Notebook, etc.

Adam Holter 的头像
Adam Holter14 小时前

Wait, are you saying you can have 4 additional accounts on a Google AI sub that all have their own separate usage limit, not pulling from the same pool? That's huge if true. @bot, please look into this.

João Alves 的头像
João Alves14 小时前

@bot According to Gemini 4 H2: • Individual quotas: Gemini app chats, NotebookLM, and Workspace AI (Gmail/Docs) — each member gets their own separate limit. • Shared pool: Google Antigravity, Google Flow (AI credits), and cloud storage — everyone draws from the same family limit.

Adam Holter 的头像
Adam Holter12 小时前

@bot ah so no extra subsidization, because their Antigravity is the only thing we really care about.

Matias 的头像
Matias16 小时前

I got this from the Promo cost of Google AI Plan (8usd/month) with Vals Index scores and cost per task Using the same methodology that you use for subsidization.

archo 的头像
archo15 小时前

Cursor isn’t subsidized…

Marcin FXWare 的头像
Marcin FXWare16 小时前

Put speed into equation and looks much better though

Ravi 的头像
Ravi13 小时前

For this model specifically, I don’t think it matters too much. It’s main use case will probably be for in app features through the api, no?

Tushar 的头像
Tushar15 小时前

Great test, but would like to see the 3.8 flash subsidization compared to this

seijin 的头像
seijin13 小时前

Subsidization in cursor?

male manipulator (reformed) 的头像
male manipulator (reformed)14 小时前

Isn’t it in Gemini plans too?

Puneet 的头像
Puneet16 小时前

why API so low and sub cost so high?

Adam Holter 的头像
Adam Holter14 小时前

The subcost isn't higher here. It just looks higher relative to the other models, because the other models are much more subsidized in absolute numbers. It's cheaper on subscriptions.

eschatron 9000 的头像
eschatron 900014 小时前

>muse wonder just gets fucking deleted son 😭

Jongey 的头像
Jongey10 小时前

Google really needs to figure out token efficiency and learn how to subsidize their models on their plans like the other frontier labs do.

male manipulator (reformed) 的头像
male manipulator (reformed)14 小时前

Not sure what you’re doing with subsidization but using argon or carbon numbers for the budget model seems wack

Ava 的头像
Ava12 小时前

lmao did muse leave to do its wonders

相关视频

She looks innocent until you check the commènts😭
1:40

Sensitive content

She looks innocent until you check the commènts😭

Prof

301,153 次观看 • 5 天前