正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Louisiana v. Callais will be an instructive case on whether race-based redistricting in the Voting Rights Act violates the equal protection rights of other Americans—stay tuned!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

217,796 subscribers

136,114 次观看 • 11 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

The Republican appointees on the Supreme Court gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in their Louisiana v. Callais decision. Here are my thoughts:

The Republican appointees on the Supreme Court gutted Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in their Louisiana v. Callais decision. Here are my thoughts:

James E. Clyburn

29,612 次观看 • 5 个月前

SCOTUS has increasingly stated, in both the Students for Fair Admissions and Ames cases, that majority Americans have equal protection rights too. DOJ Civil Rights Division is looking forward to the Court’s decision on this race-based VRA case!

SCOTUS has increasingly stated, in both the Students for Fair Admissions and Ames cases, that majority Americans have equal protection rights too. DOJ Civil Rights Division is looking forward to the Court’s decision on this race-based VRA case!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

37,390 次观看 • 11 个月前

"You cannot remember Dr. King in January and spend the rest of the year dismembering his legacy." –Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock on the Supreme Court’s Louisiana v. Callais decision, which guts section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

"You cannot remember Dr. King in January and spend the rest of the year dismembering his legacy." –Senator Reverend Raphael Warnock on the Supreme Court’s Louisiana v. Callais decision, which guts section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Pod Save America

47,216 次观看 • 4 个月前

Special protectionist jurisdictions based on race are unlawful and unnecessary. DOJ Civil Rights Division and U.S. Department of Justice will protect and defend the Voting Rights Act, which applies equally to ALL Americans!

Special protectionist jurisdictions based on race are unlawful and unnecessary. DOJ Civil Rights Division and U.S. Department of Justice will protect and defend the Voting Rights Act, which applies equally to ALL Americans!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

37,911 次观看 • 4 个月前

On the steps of SCOTUS after listening to oral argument in the important Voting Rights Act case, Louisiana v. Callais! Hash did a phenomenal job articulating U.S. Department of Justice’s position (which Jesus and I co-wrote) to a very hot bench. Oral advocacy at its finest!

On the steps of SCOTUS after listening to oral argument in the important Voting Rights Act case, Louisiana v. Callais! Hash did a phenomenal job articulating U.S. Department of Justice’s position (which Jesus and I co-wrote) to a very hot bench. Oral advocacy at its finest!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

674,799 次观看 • 11 个月前

🚨 The Supreme Court did not gut voting rights. It gutted the scam of using voting rights language to sort Americans by race and protect Democrat seats. Louisiana is the test case. The Southern House map is the real fight. Americans are citizens, not racial inventory.

🚨 The Supreme Court did not gut voting rights. It gutted the scam of using voting rights language to sort Americans by race and protect Democrat seats. Louisiana is the test case. The Southern House map is the real fight. Americans are citizens, not racial inventory.

Mehek Cooke🇺🇸

82,918 次观看 • 5 个月前

The US Supreme Court gutted the federal Voting Rights Act in the recent Callais decision. In Michigan, we’re fighting to create a state-level Voting Rights Act to enshrine those protections. Find your State Representative at and ask them to pass the Michigan Voting Rights Act.

The US Supreme Court gutted the federal Voting Rights Act in the recent Callais decision. In Michigan, we’re fighting to create a state-level Voting Rights Act to enshrine those protections. Find your State Representative at and ask them to pass the Michigan Voting Rights Act.

Mallory McMorrow

13,690 次观看 • 3 个月前

Civil Rights Weekly Recap — 🗳️ 60th Anniversary of the Voting Rights Act & Texas Redistricting 📚 Dismantling DEI in Universities ⚖️ Hate Crime Indictment for Elias Rodriguez who murdered two Israeli Embassy staffers Stay tuned for more as we make Civil Rights great again!

Civil Rights Weekly Recap — 🗳️ 60th Anniversary of the Voting Rights Act & Texas Redistricting 📚 Dismantling DEI in Universities ⚖️ Hate Crime Indictment for Elias Rodriguez who murdered two Israeli Embassy staffers Stay tuned for more as we make Civil Rights great again!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

423,424 次观看 • 1 年前

The recent Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Callais effectively killed the last remaining provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. And it represents the life's work of Chief Justice John Roberts. Here's how Roberts has been steadily working for more than 40 years to destroy the country's most important civil rights law:

The recent Supreme Court decision in Louisiana v. Callais effectively killed the last remaining provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. And it represents the life's work of Chief Justice John Roberts. Here's how Roberts has been steadily working for more than 40 years to destroy the country's most important civil rights law:

Mother Jones

70,720 次观看 • 4 个月前

In Louisiana v. Callais, SCOTUS ruled that absent intentional discrimination, states cannot draw race-based district lines. Forcing states to draw such maps is illegal, and U.S. Department of Justice’s DOJ Civil Rights Division is committed to ensuring fair representation for ALL Americans.

In Louisiana v. Callais, SCOTUS ruled that absent intentional discrimination, states cannot draw race-based district lines. Forcing states to draw such maps is illegal, and U.S. Department of Justice’s DOJ Civil Rights Division is committed to ensuring fair representation for ALL Americans.

AAGHarmeetDhillon

68,577 次观看 • 4 个月前

Today, SCOTUS took an axe to the Voting Rights Act — effectively undoing the hard fought gains to ensure minority groups have a voice in our elections. It’s time for Congress to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to ensure all Americans have equal representation.

Today, SCOTUS took an axe to the Voting Rights Act — effectively undoing the hard fought gains to ensure minority groups have a voice in our elections. It’s time for Congress to pass the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act to ensure all Americans have equal representation.

Daniel Goldman

12,539 次观看 • 5 个月前

The outrage over the Supreme Court's redistricting decision is completely overblown, just like it was in the 1990s. Political party matters far more than race. We should be celebrating this return to the original intent of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause, which protects ALL Americans! Great joining Jack Brewer to discuss this. #SupremeCourt #EqualProtection #VotingRights #CivilRights

The outrage over the Supreme Court's redistricting decision is completely overblown, just like it was in the 1990s. Political party matters far more than race. We should be celebrating this return to the original intent of the Civil Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause, which protects ALL Americans! Great joining Jack Brewer to discuss this. #SupremeCourt #EqualProtection #VotingRights #CivilRights

Carol M. Swain, PhD

82,805 次观看 • 5 个月前

This U.S. Department of Justice will step in to enforce equal access—not equal outcomes—for all Americans, whether in investment programs or universities. DOJ Civil Rights Division WILL enforce our federal civil rights laws—this is the American way!

This U.S. Department of Justice will step in to enforce equal access—not equal outcomes—for all Americans, whether in investment programs or universities. DOJ Civil Rights Division WILL enforce our federal civil rights laws—this is the American way!

AAGHarmeetDhillon

52,454 次观看 • 4 个月前

Chuck Schumer in an unhinged rant vows to block the SAVE America Act that the majority of Americans want passed: "Would strip millions of Americans of their voting rights and resurrect the ghost of the Jim Crow South...the most vicious piece of anti-voting rights legislation."

Chuck Schumer in an unhinged rant vows to block the SAVE America Act that the majority of Americans want passed: "Would strip millions of Americans of their voting rights and resurrect the ghost of the Jim Crow South...the most vicious piece of anti-voting rights legislation."

RNC Research

13,000 次观看 • 3 个月前

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 ended intentional racial discrimination in voting and districts. Democrats misconstrued it. They twisted it into a license for racial discrimination in congressional districts. The Supreme Court corrected that today. Democrats don't get to carve out DEI districts based on race. These racial districts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thanks for having me, Benny Johnson.

The Voting Rights Act of 1965 ended intentional racial discrimination in voting and districts. Democrats misconstrued it. They twisted it into a license for racial discrimination in congressional districts. The Supreme Court corrected that today. Democrats don't get to carve out DEI districts based on race. These racial districts violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Thanks for having me, Benny Johnson.

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

22,348 次观看 • 5 个月前

The Left turned the Voting Rights Act into a racial gerrymandering machine. The Supreme Court finally corrected course: The Voting Rights Act prohibits racial discrimination. It does not mandate permanent racial quotas and endless race-based districting—it prohibits them.

The Left turned the Voting Rights Act into a racial gerrymandering machine. The Supreme Court finally corrected course: The Voting Rights Act prohibits racial discrimination. It does not mandate permanent racial quotas and endless race-based districting—it prohibits them.

Senator Eric Schmitt

12,854 次观看 • 4 个月前

The Constitution forbids states from dividing Americans based on race. But for years, activists twisted the Voting Rights Act to demand racial gerrymandering. No more. The Supreme Court confirmed that racial sorting was always illegal.

The Constitution forbids states from dividing Americans based on race. But for years, activists twisted the Voting Rights Act to demand racial gerrymandering. No more. The Supreme Court confirmed that racial sorting was always illegal.

Eric Schmitt

17,303 次观看 • 4 个月前

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Division is glad to have reached a resolution with PayPal! Discrimination on the basis of race is illegal under the Equal Credit Protection Act and we will not tolerate it at U.S. Department of Justice.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Division is glad to have reached a resolution with PayPal! Discrimination on the basis of race is illegal under the Equal Credit Protection Act and we will not tolerate it at U.S. Department of Justice.

AAGHarmeetDhillon

38,837 次观看 • 4 个月前

#BREAKING: Obama: “The Voting Rights Act, sections II, IV, V were the cornerstones of providing political power to African Americans…it was the cornerstone and the culmination of years of struggle—blood, sweat, tears, in some cases deaths. I might not be here as president had it not been for those who courageously helped to pass the Voting Rights Act.”😢

#BREAKING: Obama: “The Voting Rights Act, sections II, IV, V were the cornerstones of providing political power to African Americans…it was the cornerstone and the culmination of years of struggle—blood, sweat, tears, in some cases deaths. I might not be here as president had it not been for those who courageously helped to pass the Voting Rights Act.”😢

Emoluments Clause

15,336 次观看 • 5 个月前