Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Low quality hu bamba🍑🥵 hizi raw backshots gaddemit

36,689 次观看 • 22 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Who really has a better food culture? Tom Segura who traveled with notable Michelin star chef, Franklin Lee, argues that Tokyo blows New York right out of the water. Going so far as to claim that you don't even need to visit a restaurant, blocks or miles away, just go down to the lobby of your hotel. How's that even possible? Tokyo wins on consistency, quality floor, and everyday excellence. Tom Segura (with Michelin-starred chef Philip Franklin Lee) is right—Tokyo's food scene is unmatched in reliability and depth. How the hotel lobby claim works: Japan's konbini (7-Eleven, Lawson, FamilyMart) are legendary. Fresh onigiri, perfectly seasoned karaage, tamago sando, seasonal desserts, and hot meals rival many casual spots elsewhere. High standards, frequent restocking, and tech (perfect rice, packaging) make them legit delicious—not "just snacks." Department store basements (depachika) and station food halls elevate it further. Why Tokyo dominates: -Approx 160k restaurants (vs. NYC's ~25k)—5x more per capita. Zoning allows tiny spots everywhere. -Most Michelin stars worldwide (hundreds, including many 3-stars). -Obsessive craftsmanship: even cheap ramen or sushi hits high consistency. Low chance of a bad meal. -Diversity within Japanese excellence + strong international (though NYC edges raw global variety like Latin/Indian). NYC shines in immigrant diversity and hype energy—you get incredible Ethiopian, Dominican, or bagels anywhere. But Tokyo offers higher average quality, obsession with ingredients/seasonality, and accessibility. It seems Segura nailed it: Tokyo shts on NY for pure food culture. It's possible because Japan treats all food seriously.

🚫👁️Drinks on Saturday🇺🇸

122,886 次观看 • 4 个月前

MY BEAUTIFUL SISTERS AND DEAR BROTHERS, itazameni vyema sana hii video! Tazama namna Chama alivyotoa pass ya kwanza kwa Rally Bwalya ‘The Left Footed Magician’ hii ni one two by default, ila tazama namna Bwalya alivyouweka mpira kwenye eneo tulivu kutoka kwenye press ya Platnumz, umetolewa mpira from high concentration to Low hizi sisi watu wa PCB tunaziita DIFFUSION PASSES hata kwa Watalaam wa Quantam Physics wanakubaliana nami. Brain ya BWALYA na uwezo wa CHAMA, wengi husema Chama ni mzito hakimbii ila Maestro anatembea sana kwenye AREA 14 ama GOLDEN SQUARE hapa nitakuja kuwapa elimu yake siku nyingine, ndie Mchezaji mwenye utulivu zaidi na kasi zaidi Kusini mwa Jangwa la Sahara eneo hilo, sprinting with brain and accuracy! Tazama tena baada ya kupokea pass kutoka kwa RB, pass ilinyooshwa mithili ya Dobi wa Ikulu akiandaa nguo za Mama Samia kwa ajili ya vikao! Halafu ona namna Chama alivyotoka pembeni na kulisaka box, kakimbia sana halafu akapause, ikatumika akili nyingi sana kupitia NEWTON’S LAW OF MOTION haikuwa instant stop ila gradual, kisha akaanza Ukarani wake wa Sensa ya Watu na Makazi mmoja mmoja. Okay! Tazama tena hapo kwenye video baada ya kuingia kwenye box alimuona John Bocco on space ila aliniambia MANAGER hapo bado nilikuwa nina uwezo wa kuwachukua tu, jukwaa linakaanga chips huko! @baraka_mpenja anataka kufa kwa kwikwi huko, Matajiri jukwaani wanataka kuruka wafie pale chini, halafu Chama kwenye dunia yake ambayo hakuna Mchezaji Kusini mwa Jangwa la Sahara au Tanganyika ipate uhuru alikuwa na utulivu huu. Tazama namna gani Simba ilikuwa na PROFESSIONALS wa kutisha! Nyuma yake RALLY BWALYA anakuja kukaa on space nje ya box kidogo for second balls kwakuwa ni Mnyama! Halafu LUIS MIQUISSONE alikuwa chini kabisa mtazame alivyoingia kwa kasi ya kufa Mtu, alikuwa anaenda kuisaka ile space ndani ya box kama Plan B! Itazame hapo Simba yani Chama ana mpira halafu PLAN A ni Bocco, Plan B ni Miquissone na PLAN C ni Bwalya! Bado TRIPLE C ana plan mpaka Z, hii ndio penati bora zaidi kuwahi kushuhudiwa kwa miaka ya hivi karibuni duniani, tafuta clip zote za penati halafu jivue mahaba halafu utagundua kitu. QUALITY WANANGU QUALITY MENEJA. 🎥 Azam TV

Farhan Kihamu Jr

68,599 次观看 • 3 年前

This is the perspective that has gotten missed: There is no context in which you would let random, anonymous strangers upload 100kb files to your computer on a self-regulating p2p network. The constant appeals to censorship resistance are a complete red herring. Mempool filters have never resulted in censorship - But even if they did, censorship resistance can never come at the expense of people neglecting to take responsibility for what their computers are doing. Here's what's different with OP_RETURN - Old methods of storing nasty stuff in the chain required tonnes of obfuscation to work. The data necessarily would get broken into multiple chunks and someone would need to intentionally reconstruct it all and people naively relaying/storing it can plausibly absolve themselves of responsibility in doing so. OP_RETURN at default 100kb size kills plausible deniability completely. You're downloading, processing and uploading *raw* gigabytes of disgusting JPG and MP4 files. And Core are (for now) deprecating your ability to do otherwise. 80 bytes of OP_RETURN is a couple of hashes or a 16x16 pixel JPG. No one can realistically do anything with that that's going to make running a Bitcoin node unacceptable. 100kb is a different story. That's a low quality video of God-knows what. And I'm sorry, but having a neutral monetary network does not require treating all data the same way. I am expected to discriminate against certain types of data in every context. I just usually rely on third parties to do that on my behalf. Bitcoin doesn't work that way, it's on us to self-regulate and if we can't, running a Bitcoin node is going to be rightly stigmatized and no one is going to do it outside of tightly regulated environments.

Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110

185,757 次观看 • 1 年前

Alex Krainer (Alex (Sasha) Krainer) draws the sharpest possible line: the real conflict is not between nations, but between two opposing systems of economic governance. One is the British free-trade system of extraction, concentration of wealth, and forever wars. The other is the national system of political economy — the American System of Hamilton, Clay, Lincoln and Henry C. Carey. “The conflict in fact is between the western colonialist system and everyone who rejects colonial subjugation. The war in Ukraine, war against Iran, genocide of the Palestinian people, the buildup to the war on China, the uncontrolled migrations, and many other social, political, and economic crises are all merely different battlefields of the same great conflict. What are these two opposed systems of economic governance? One is the British system of free trade. The other is the national system of political economy. It is often referred to as the American system because it was pioneered by American leaders like Alexander Hamilton, Henry Clay, Abraham Lincoln, and Lincoln’s chief economic adviser, Henry C. Carey. In a nutshell, the national system seeks to create protective barriers to foreign trade in order to give domestic manufacturing a fighting chance against foreign competition. It also accumulates capital at home, investing it into manufacturing, infrastructure, education, research and development, innovation, culture, and other uses that raise society’s standards of living. By contrast, the British system of free trade extracts wealth and concentrates it. It seeks to remove all barriers to the worldwide free flow of capital, always in pursuit of the highest possible return. With free trade, nations are obliged to compete for investment capital by systematically depressing wages, job security, pensions, healthcare services, and education. Other costs which cut into returns on capital are infrastructure development, social spending programs, and protection of the environment. Therefore, competing for investment capital entails progressive slashing of all these cost items down to the bare bones. In that sense, the British free trade system amounts to a competitive race to the bottom. In his 1851 book The Harmony of Interests, Abraham Lincoln’s economic adviser Henry Carey contrasted the two systems, opening with the words: ‘Two systems are before the world.’ Carey’s prose is rather long, but it could be summarized along seven key dimensions: 1. Trade versus production. One system directs capital and draws labor towards trade and speculation. This tends to depress wages and erode prosperity. The other system fosters production of goods, services, and infrastructure. It leads to higher wages and rising standards of living. 2. Raw materials versus finished goods. One system favors mass production of raw materials and cash crops for trade. It systematically impoverishes farmers and reduces their employment. The other system favors production of more refined, high-quality products, enriching their producers. 3. Exporting produce versus enjoying it at home. One system sends mass-produced bulk abroad, sometimes even causing famines in the producing economy. The other system organizes labor to satisfy domestic demand and produce an abundance of diverse high-quality products at home. 4. Concentration versus dispersion of wealth. One system concentrates wealth and power in a few hands in great commercial cities while depleting and impoverishing the rest of the nation. The other system enriches those engaged in production and disperses wealth more evenly across society. 5. War versus moral and educational growth. One system compels the productive sector to fund fleets and armies. The other directs the same means for moral and intellectual growth of the people in their nations. 6. Stable communities versus population replacement. One system requires a large low-skilled labor force that accepts work with low wages. It predictably resorts to a mass influx of immigrants. The other system raises the standards of living, prosperity, and security of the native labor force. 7. Universal war versus universal peace. One system gives rise to universal forever wars. The other strives to preserve peace. Let’s condense these seven points even further. One system favors production of raw commodities in bulk. It lowers living standards, concentrates wealth in few hands, impoverishes the workforce, and favors population replacement, militarization and forever wars. This is the British system of free trade. The other system favors production of diverse quality products at home, enriches their producers, raises the standards of living, disperses wealth, fosters stable communities and favors stability and peace. This is the national system of political economy — or the American system. Its aspiration is sovereignty and independence. Free trade’s aspiration is globalization and unipolar hegemony. The contrast between the two systems could not be any starker, and the record entirely validates the way Henry Carey characterizes them. And we’ll see from actual historical examples where one system or the other was implemented and from the ways that they changed the societies in question.” Two systems are before the world. One produces prosperity and peace. The other produces poverty, migration and perpetual war. The choice remains.

🅰pocalypsis 🅰pocalypseos 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🅉

46,109 次观看 • 25 天前

THE VP & KEMENYAN - Benzoin Needs Forests - Today, I am going to talk about benzoin, also known as ‘kemenyan’. Some of you might have seen this video: “I once discussed the issue of downstream processing of benzoin; many people laughed, saying, ‘Benzoin is for shamans. Neneneneh… Wrong. Benzoin is as valuable as nickel. However, we have always sold it in its raw form. The women who wear perfumes like LV and Gucci are made from benzoin. We continue to sell it raw. That’s why we encourage young people to research, offering them other good places for research...” First, in this video, I won’t focus on the price comparison between benzoin and nickel, because comparing the price of a finite resource like nickel to a renewable forest product like benzoin isn’t straightforward. Any good economist knows that to make an accurate comparison, we need to account for community equity and natural capital in the calculation. Secondly, done responsibly, I support the development of the downstream industry for benzoin. However, first, consider the whole picture. Benzoin, a resin obtained from various species of Styrax trees, is one of the Non-Timber Forest Products that have been collected for centuries using traditional knowledge and techniques. Cinnamic acid, contained in the sap produced by Styrax benzoin, is an important compound that is used for various purposes, such as preservatives, fragrances, cosmetics, and pharmaceutical products. Benzoin is called kemenyan in Indonesian and haminjon in Batak. This is very important: Styrax trees can be found in the undergrowth of primary forests and secondary forests. Native to tropical regions in Eastern and Southeast Asia, the trees grow along streams and require consistent moisture; they thrive as understory plants in the shade of larger trees. In Sumatra, Styrax trees are often found within the local community’s customary forests. Traditional benzoin forest management involves only low-intensity disturbances, maintaining an ecological structure that enables the effective accumulation of forest species. The source of seedlings and good quality of seeds mostly comes from natural forests. In summary, the sustainable production of benzoin needs a sustainable forest. My question is, to develop a sustainable downstream industry for benzoin or kemenyan, will Mr Vice President end the destruction of natural forests? Will Mr Vice President guarantee the protection of local communities’ customary forests, and support the community in building a sustainable benzoin industry based on equity and fair treatment? The fact is that to date, less than 8% of customary forests in Indonesia are recognised by the government. Many are threatened and destroyed for monoculture palm oil, pulpwood plantations and others. I am unsure whether Louis Vuitton or gucci will accept products from sources associated with deforestation or community rights violations. Will Mr Vice President walk the walk?

Aida Greenbury

149,871 次观看 • 1 年前