Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

🇫🇷 MACRON IS RIGHT: REGIME CHANGE NEVER WORKS - AND IRAN WOULD BE NO DIFFERENT Trump just threatened to join Israel in bombing Iran. It’s not just saber-rattling - it signals yet another U.S. push for regime change. Macron warns: “Anyone who has sought in the past to change...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,855,598 subscribers

295,641 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

10 Yorum

DrPejman ☼ 𓄂𓆃 profil fotoğrafı
DrPejman ☼ 𓄂𓆃1 yıl önce

WRONG. The Iranian people have been fighting for 46 years to get rid of this terrorist regime

Holly Williams profil fotoğrafı
Holly Williams1 yıl önce

@Ronald_7727🍕 This guy is a genius and is awesome. 🎌 🔥 🌻

Privilege profil fotoğrafı
Privilege1 yıl önce

Didnt' it work for Germany and Japan after WWII?

mikecarlsn profil fotoğrafı
mikecarlsn1 yıl önce

The ayatolla’s reign is coming to an end. The people of Iran will rise at this opportunity and fall his oppressive rule.

Matt Allen profil fotoğrafı
Matt Allen1 yıl önce

I agree with him to an extent because the people definitely have to want it, but thankfully France helped America with a regime change in 1776 🇺🇸

Loop0xyz profil fotoğrafı
Loop0xyz1 yıl önce

Agreed

Loop0xyz profil fotoğrafı
Loop0xyz1 yıl önce

Civilians casualties only

♡Rain♡🇺🇸 profil fotoğrafı
♡Rain♡🇺🇸1 yıl önce

Macrom

MAGA CAUCUS profil fotoğrafı
MAGA CAUCUS1 yıl önce

France surrendered. lol 😂

Coach n Stitch profil fotoğrafı
Coach n Stitch1 yıl önce

But Macron want a regime change in Russia via Ukraine

Benzer Videolar

Fallon: If President Trump effects regime change in Iran, it would be the crowning achievement of his administration, and it would affect the midterms. Ingraham: You just brought up regime change. That would be phenomenal, obviously. It would be great. But we don’t even have the strait fully open yet for the safe passage of tankers. That’s not what the American people thought they were getting with President Trump when they elected him—someone pursuing regime change. They’ve said that is not their goal. It seems like we’re leapfrogging to regime change, which again, would be fabulous
1:50

Fallon: If President Trump effects regime change in Iran, it would be the crowning achievement of his administration, and it would affect the midterms. Ingraham: You just brought up regime change. That would be phenomenal, obviously. It would be great. But we don’t even have the strait fully open yet for the safe passage of tankers. That’s not what the American people thought they were getting with President Trump when they elected him—someone pursuing regime change. They’ve said that is not their goal. It seems like we’re leapfrogging to regime change, which again, would be fabulous

Acyn

185,936 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

The push for regime change in Iran ignores the fact that the U.S. already tried it. In 1953, the US overthrew their PM and installed a puppet. That laid the groundwork for Khomeini's rise and the current regime.
5:02

The push for regime change in Iran ignores the fact that the U.S. already tried it. In 1953, the US overthrew their PM and installed a puppet. That laid the groundwork for Khomeini's rise and the current regime.

Eric July

63,761 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Rep. Sara Jacobs responds to claims Trump is “ending the forever war,” pointing to the 1953 U.S.-backed coup in Iran and warning that regime change can lead to “a more hardline regime, a security vacuum, potentially civil war.” “It started in large part because the United States went into Iran and did a regime change operation… We don't know what actually is going to happen after we do these kinds of regime change operations. You're likely to get a more hardline regime, a security vacuum, potentially civil war… The idea that this is ending a forever war… when it is, in fact, starting another one… is kind of preposterous.”
1:21

Rep. Sara Jacobs responds to claims Trump is “ending the forever war,” pointing to the 1953 U.S.-backed coup in Iran and warning that regime change can lead to “a more hardline regime, a security vacuum, potentially civil war.” “It started in large part because the United States went into Iran and did a regime change operation… We don't know what actually is going to happen after we do these kinds of regime change operations. You're likely to get a more hardline regime, a security vacuum, potentially civil war… The idea that this is ending a forever war… when it is, in fact, starting another one… is kind of preposterous.”

HalalFlow

20,380 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

🚨 FORMER CIA OFFICER: “ISRAEL WANTS REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN, BUT THEN WHAT?” Former CIA officer and U.S. Air Force combat veteran: “If Israel doesn’t want to wipe out every Iranian citizen, they need to change the regime. If Israel pushes for regime change… who takes over? A puppet state? Another strongman? What comes next may be even more dangerous.”
1:43

🚨 FORMER CIA OFFICER: “ISRAEL WANTS REGIME CHANGE IN IRAN, BUT THEN WHAT?” Former CIA officer and U.S. Air Force combat veteran: “If Israel doesn’t want to wipe out every Iranian citizen, they need to change the regime. If Israel pushes for regime change… who takes over? A puppet state? Another strongman? What comes next may be even more dangerous.”

Mario Nawfal

104,884 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Ana Kasparian on a potential U.S. strike on Iran: “There's no way in which it would benefit the United States. Iran's ballistic missiles are not capable of reaching the US. The only country that has a vested interest in regime change war in Iran, of course, is Israel...”
2:37

Ana Kasparian on a potential U.S. strike on Iran: “There's no way in which it would benefit the United States. Iran's ballistic missiles are not capable of reaching the US. The only country that has a vested interest in regime change war in Iran, of course, is Israel...”

The Resonance

55,048 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Let's go through the list of regime changes in Iran and how they played out Regime Change, it works every time! Say the CIA and MI6 Pay attention to your history, or you'll be doomed to repeat it
1:36

Let's go through the list of regime changes in Iran and how they played out Regime Change, it works every time! Say the CIA and MI6 Pay attention to your history, or you'll be doomed to repeat it

Jack Posobiec

47,463 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

POSO DROPS THE HAMMER: HOW THE CIA LIT THE FUSE IN IRAN (1953–1979). Understand the real history—or lie like Lindsey Graham, who just wants more regime change, more war, more death. POSO: There was something called Operation Ajax in the 1950s, back when Iran was a democratic republic. And who overthrew the democratic PM? The CIA. That’s what made the Iranians so mad they turned to a nut job like Ayatollah Khomeini. Last time all these eggheads in the CIA said, “This would be a great idea.” Why? Oil. BP controlled Iran’s oil. Iran nationalized it. The West said, “We can’t have that.” Started with MI6. Pre-Vietnam. Same way the French came to us about Vietnam, the Brits came to us about Iran. That regime change led to the Islamic Revolution. We overthrew democratic Iran. That was us. Then the Shah got overthrown. They turned to the nuts in the Islamic Revolution. That’s the actual history. You can understand that—or lie like Lindsey Graham, because you want more regime change, more war, more death.
2:22

POSO DROPS THE HAMMER: HOW THE CIA LIT THE FUSE IN IRAN (1953–1979). Understand the real history—or lie like Lindsey Graham, who just wants more regime change, more war, more death. POSO: There was something called Operation Ajax in the 1950s, back when Iran was a democratic republic. And who overthrew the democratic PM? The CIA. That’s what made the Iranians so mad they turned to a nut job like Ayatollah Khomeini. Last time all these eggheads in the CIA said, “This would be a great idea.” Why? Oil. BP controlled Iran’s oil. Iran nationalized it. The West said, “We can’t have that.” Started with MI6. Pre-Vietnam. Same way the French came to us about Vietnam, the Brits came to us about Iran. That regime change led to the Islamic Revolution. We overthrew democratic Iran. That was us. Then the Shah got overthrown. They turned to the nuts in the Islamic Revolution. That’s the actual history. You can understand that—or lie like Lindsey Graham, because you want more regime change, more war, more death.

Grace Chong, MBI

129,908 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: White House says a regime change happened in Iran. Reporter: The President yesterday said that he had achieved regime change in Iran because the regime has changed in terms… Leavitt: I mean has it not? Their entire leadership has been killed, and nobody has really seen or legitimately heard from this alleged new leader. So wouldn't you say there's been a change in the regime? Reporter: There's been a change in leadership. Leavitt: There's been a change in the regime leadership, which is what the President said. So thank you for confirming he is right
0:30

⚡️🇺🇸JUST IN: White House says a regime change happened in Iran. Reporter: The President yesterday said that he had achieved regime change in Iran because the regime has changed in terms… Leavitt: I mean has it not? Their entire leadership has been killed, and nobody has really seen or legitimately heard from this alleged new leader. So wouldn't you say there's been a change in the regime? Reporter: There's been a change in leadership. Leavitt: There's been a change in the regime leadership, which is what the President said. So thank you for confirming he is right

Suppressed News.

75,893 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

⚡️JUST IN: The U.S. Treasury Secretary states that the new "Toughest Sanctions in History" against Iran will cause Regime Change "It worked in Venezuela and it is working in Cuba right now. We are going to Collapse this Regime"
0:26

⚡️JUST IN: The U.S. Treasury Secretary states that the new "Toughest Sanctions in History" against Iran will cause Regime Change "It worked in Venezuela and it is working in Cuba right now. We are going to Collapse this Regime"

Iran Observer

130,578 görüntüleme • 6 gün önce

I spoke today with Bianna Golodryga and Dan Senor about where this war may be heading. There’s a clear divergence in war aims: the U.S. is careful not to commit to regime change, while Israel is formally pushing in that direction. Change in Iran is already underway- the supreme leader and much of the leadership are gone. The real question is what kind of change. If the regime survives, it may emerge even more radical. That’s one reason Israel will push to keep degrading Iran’s capabilities- until Washington draws the line. CNN Breaking News
10:12

I spoke today with Bianna Golodryga and Dan Senor about where this war may be heading. There’s a clear divergence in war aims: the U.S. is careful not to commit to regime change, while Israel is formally pushing in that direction. Change in Iran is already underway- the supreme leader and much of the leadership are gone. The real question is what kind of change. If the regime survives, it may emerge even more radical. That’s one reason Israel will push to keep degrading Iran’s capabilities- until Washington draws the line. CNN Breaking News

נדב איל Nadav Eyal

49,546 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

IRAN WAR BOMBSHELL: It Has Now Been Confirmed That The Office Of National Intelligence And The Pentagon Warned President Trump One Week Before the Iran War Began That In Most Scenarios, The United States Would Fail Massively With Regime Change In Iran And Potentially Trigger A Global Catastrophe
6:13

IRAN WAR BOMBSHELL: It Has Now Been Confirmed That The Office Of National Intelligence And The Pentagon Warned President Trump One Week Before the Iran War Began That In Most Scenarios, The United States Would Fail Massively With Regime Change In Iran And Potentially Trigger A Global Catastrophe

Alex Jones

2,036,337 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

A rare minute of truth on British television: "In 1953 MI6 & the CIA organised a coup to topple a democratically-elected President & replace him with the Shah. Iran has never tried to have regime change in the UK & US, but the UK & US have imposed regime change on Iran and it didn’t end well.”
0:34

A rare minute of truth on British television: "In 1953 MI6 & the CIA organised a coup to topple a democratically-elected President & replace him with the Shah. Iran has never tried to have regime change in the UK & US, but the UK & US have imposed regime change on Iran and it didn’t end well.”

Afshin Rattansi

692,889 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“The premise from the outset that, if the United States and Israel were to bomb Iran—that tens of thousands of Iranians would come out onto the streets, I think was a fallacy. It was wrong to begin with. Change in Iran will not come from the air, it has to be homegrown.” National Council of Resistance of Iran official Ali Safavi argues that regime change in Iran could never be imposed through U.S. or Israeli airstrikes, maintaining that meaningful change must be driven by the Iranian people themselves. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!
1:38

“The premise from the outset that, if the United States and Israel were to bomb Iran—that tens of thousands of Iranians would come out onto the streets, I think was a fallacy. It was wrong to begin with. Change in Iran will not come from the air, it has to be homegrown.” National Council of Resistance of Iran official Ali Safavi argues that regime change in Iran could never be imposed through U.S. or Israeli airstrikes, maintaining that meaningful change must be driven by the Iranian people themselves. Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

69,415 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Jeffrey Sachs makes it clear that the US and Israel are planning regime change in Iran: "This is a well-known playbook. We're watching a regime change operation underway. This is war of a particular kind that the CIA and Mossad have used repeatedly over many decades."
1:17

Jeffrey Sachs makes it clear that the US and Israel are planning regime change in Iran: "This is a well-known playbook. We're watching a regime change operation underway. This is war of a particular kind that the CIA and Mossad have used repeatedly over many decades."

Jostein Hauge

14,170 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

The last time an American administration actively worked to replace a regime in the Middle East was at Iran’s back door. In 2003, the U.S. invasion of Iraq ended with the arrest—and eventual hanging—of Saddam Hussein. Absurdly, that war helped Iran twice over. First, the West, in what can only be described in hindsight as strategic folly, eliminated Tehran’s most dangerous regional enemy—one that had been draining Iran’s blood, money, and resources for decades. Freed from that pressure, Iran could refocus its full attention on confronting what it calls the “little devil” and the “big devil.” Second, the chaos and trauma unleashed by regime change in Iraq turned the very concept into a taboo. How far off the agenda is it? Just last Tuesday—in the press conference with Benjamin Netanyahu—Donald Trump explicitly said that regime change in Iran is not the objective. But was that statement genuine—or misdirection? Iran did not take Trump seriously when he gave it 60 days to negotiate, warning that on day 61 Israel would strike and destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities. They ignored that warning. Yesterday, Trump issued another warning: if the regime kills protesters, the United States will respond. The regime did not listen. Protesters were killed. The question now is whether Iran will listen the third time. If it does, we may be witnessing the early stages of a historic shift in the Middle East. Trump has referenced Iran twice in this context—and in both cases, his words were backed by action: the strike at Fordow and the elimination of Qassem Soleimani. Trump is signalling. I believe there is a clear link between the attempted change of government in Venezuela and the possibility of change in Tehran. Let it be so.
1:30

The last time an American administration actively worked to replace a regime in the Middle East was at Iran’s back door. In 2003, the U.S. invasion of Iraq ended with the arrest—and eventual hanging—of Saddam Hussein. Absurdly, that war helped Iran twice over. First, the West, in what can only be described in hindsight as strategic folly, eliminated Tehran’s most dangerous regional enemy—one that had been draining Iran’s blood, money, and resources for decades. Freed from that pressure, Iran could refocus its full attention on confronting what it calls the “little devil” and the “big devil.” Second, the chaos and trauma unleashed by regime change in Iraq turned the very concept into a taboo. How far off the agenda is it? Just last Tuesday—in the press conference with Benjamin Netanyahu—Donald Trump explicitly said that regime change in Iran is not the objective. But was that statement genuine—or misdirection? Iran did not take Trump seriously when he gave it 60 days to negotiate, warning that on day 61 Israel would strike and destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities. They ignored that warning. Yesterday, Trump issued another warning: if the regime kills protesters, the United States will respond. The regime did not listen. Protesters were killed. The question now is whether Iran will listen the third time. If it does, we may be witnessing the early stages of a historic shift in the Middle East. Trump has referenced Iran twice in this context—and in both cases, his words were backed by action: the strike at Fordow and the elimination of Qassem Soleimani. Trump is signalling. I believe there is a clear link between the attempted change of government in Venezuela and the possibility of change in Tehran. Let it be so.

Amit Segal

17,445 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

After Afghanistan and Iraq, Americans are rightly skeptical about a regime change war. If President Trump is pushing for a regime change war in Venezuela, they need to be very clear with the American people about it.
0:51

After Afghanistan and Iraq, Americans are rightly skeptical about a regime change war. If President Trump is pushing for a regime change war in Venezuela, they need to be very clear with the American people about it.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin

100,307 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce