Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Mainstream archaeology often treats prehistory as a closed case…no advanced science, no lost civilizations, no serious anomalies. Questions that challenge this linear model are dismissed outright. But science isn’t supposed to work that way. With growing evidence of ancient catastrophes…and future near-misses already on the calendar…the possibility that earlier... show more

Randall Carlson

158,672 subscribers

38,653 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Education Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

"Is it possible that Ancient Civilizations had technology like an iPhone today but then an extinction event happened?" Michael Button's answer is fascinating. We’ve had brains like this for 300,000 years. So why do we assume civilization only happened once? This clip explores the possibility of lost technology— and the questions science can’t fully answer. Michael Button

"Is it possible that Ancient Civilizations had technology like an iPhone today but then an extinction event happened?" Michael Button's answer is fascinating. We’ve had brains like this for 300,000 years. So why do we assume civilization only happened once? This clip explores the possibility of lost technology— and the questions science can’t fully answer. Michael Button

Julian Dorey

593,595 views • 9 months ago

Law and science are supposed to protect people—not work in silos. In this clip, I lay out court-admissible evidence, peer-reviewed studies, and a growing body of international data that raise serious questions about cancer pathways and mRNA technology. The point isn’t panic. The point is process. When legal evidence meets evidentiary standards, it shouldn’t be dismissed—it should trigger immediate scientific investigation. We don’t move forward by silencing questions. We move forward when law, science, and investigators work together—urgently and transparently.

Law and science are supposed to protect people—not work in silos. In this clip, I lay out court-admissible evidence, peer-reviewed studies, and a growing body of international data that raise serious questions about cancer pathways and mRNA technology. The point isn’t panic. The point is process. When legal evidence meets evidentiary standards, it shouldn’t be dismissed—it should trigger immediate scientific investigation. We don’t move forward by silencing questions. We move forward when law, science, and investigators work together—urgently and transparently.

Tom Renz

10,838 views • 8 months ago

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 views • 6 months ago

Since Hitler is trending… It’s time to have a “grownup conversation” as to why the Nazis, who were the most technologically advanced at that time, were SO interested in lost ancient civilizations. The fact that the ‘Swastika’ is a ~10,000yr old symbol found on 5 continents around the world is strong suggestive evidence that Ancient civilizations were capable of traversing vast oceans *thousands* of years before ever thought to be possible. The underlying implications of that are astounding. Genuine question: Did Hitler and the Nazis know there was an advanced civilization on earth in our ancient past?

Since Hitler is trending… It’s time to have a “grownup conversation” as to why the Nazis, who were the most technologically advanced at that time, were SO interested in lost ancient civilizations. The fact that the ‘Swastika’ is a ~10,000yr old symbol found on 5 continents around the world is strong suggestive evidence that Ancient civilizations were capable of traversing vast oceans thousands of years before ever thought to be possible. The underlying implications of that are astounding. Genuine question: Did Hitler and the Nazis know there was an advanced civilization on earth in our ancient past?

Jimmy Corsetti

958,008 views • 1 year ago

Nobody is the average. You are not the average, I am not the average... yet most of our scientific approach to health/disease is a science of averages that says little about you as a person. I understand people's frustration. We need a new way of doing science that serves each of us. We are all agents in building a healthier, more compassionate, sustainable future. I feel inspired to help build that future. Exciting times ahead! More about current initiatives in partnership with @msahsorin and our growing team here:

Nobody is the average. You are not the average, I am not the average... yet most of our scientific approach to health/disease is a science of averages that says little about you as a person. I understand people's frustration. We need a new way of doing science that serves each of us. We are all agents in building a healthier, more compassionate, sustainable future. I feel inspired to help build that future. Exciting times ahead! More about current initiatives in partnership with @msahsorin and our growing team here:

Martin Picard

253,603 views • 9 months ago

Civilization is not a straight line but a continuum. Catastrophic events could have erased entire cultures, some potentially far more advanced than we assume. Critics search for mirrors of our own society, but lost civilizations may have wielded technologies and knowledge utterly unlike ours. The pyramids hint at a past where human potential was realized in ways we no longer recognize.

Civilization is not a straight line but a continuum. Catastrophic events could have erased entire cultures, some potentially far more advanced than we assume. Critics search for mirrors of our own society, but lost civilizations may have wielded technologies and knowledge utterly unlike ours. The pyramids hint at a past where human potential was realized in ways we no longer recognize.

Randall Carlson

22,594 views • 1 year ago

Joe Rogan and Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas get into a serious conversation about Fauci and “The Science.” ROGAN: "One of the things that was really weird about the whole COVID pandemic was that we weren't supposed to question science… when Fauci said if you question Anthony Fauci, you are questioning science." SRINIVAS: "That's because they try to assign credibility through their degrees, through their affiliations... but not through the scientific method. Anybody should be allowed to ask questions, as long as they are open to new evidence. And that's the most important quality of a scientist." ROGAN: "There was an actual government push to silence questioning, and legitimate researchers were kicked off of Twitter because they didn't back the narrative. This is all anti-science." SRINIVAS: "Curbing that is almost like a way of saying, 'Look, I'm going to tell you what happened. You need to believe in my worldview, and I'm not open to new perspectives.'" Science demands questioning. The moment someone tells you not to, they've stopped doing science.

Joe Rogan and Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas get into a serious conversation about Fauci and “The Science.” ROGAN: "One of the things that was really weird about the whole COVID pandemic was that we weren't supposed to question science… when Fauci said if you question Anthony Fauci, you are questioning science." SRINIVAS: "That's because they try to assign credibility through their degrees, through their affiliations... but not through the scientific method. Anybody should be allowed to ask questions, as long as they are open to new evidence. And that's the most important quality of a scientist." ROGAN: "There was an actual government push to silence questioning, and legitimate researchers were kicked off of Twitter because they didn't back the narrative. This is all anti-science." SRINIVAS: "Curbing that is almost like a way of saying, 'Look, I'm going to tell you what happened. You need to believe in my worldview, and I'm not open to new perspectives.'" Science demands questioning. The moment someone tells you not to, they've stopped doing science.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

194,809 views • 3 months ago

Bret Weinstein suspects ancient advanced civilizations existed—and got wiped out. “The evidence is far too compelling to dismiss.” Joe Rogan: “I’ve been really fascinated by the Sumerian King List.” “They’re the ones that have all this crazy stuff with the Anunnaki.” “It’s this list of people who ran the Earth for tens of thousands of years.” “Their reign was like tens of thousands of years, and then there’s this huge flood.” “Afterwards, the timelines become way more—it’s like, he was a king for 50 years.” “They have it documented to like eight kings over the entire course of their civilization, including the places that these kings ruled that actually exist.” “These are ancient cities that are actually built on top of even more ancient cities.” “And they had an understanding of stuff that was way beyond what we thought they were capable of.” “They have Pythagoras’ theorem 1,000 years before Pythagoras.” Bret Weinstein: “There is this increasingly fascinating thread about a recurrent disaster cycle, and the possibility that sophisticated civilizations get erased and that we rediscover.” Joe Rogan Bret Weinstein

Bret Weinstein suspects ancient advanced civilizations existed—and got wiped out. “The evidence is far too compelling to dismiss.” Joe Rogan: “I’ve been really fascinated by the Sumerian King List.” “They’re the ones that have all this crazy stuff with the Anunnaki.” “It’s this list of people who ran the Earth for tens of thousands of years.” “Their reign was like tens of thousands of years, and then there’s this huge flood.” “Afterwards, the timelines become way more—it’s like, he was a king for 50 years.” “They have it documented to like eight kings over the entire course of their civilization, including the places that these kings ruled that actually exist.” “These are ancient cities that are actually built on top of even more ancient cities.” “And they had an understanding of stuff that was way beyond what we thought they were capable of.” “They have Pythagoras’ theorem 1,000 years before Pythagoras.” Bret Weinstein: “There is this increasingly fascinating thread about a recurrent disaster cycle, and the possibility that sophisticated civilizations get erased and that we rediscover.” Joe Rogan Bret Weinstein

Holden Culotta

665,053 views • 10 months ago

Jonathan Caplan KC, one of the speakers joining us in Stockholm on October 1st, speaking here with Sky News. This is exactly why Beyond Institute exists. We believe in transparency, openness and serious scientific inquiry. Working together with researchers and experts, we want to follow the evidence, ask the difficult questions and better understand the phenomena we are witnessing. No predetermined conclusions. No fear of where the evidence may lead. At some point, the penny has to drop. Keep your eyes open. Follow the evidence. The truth must prevail. #UAP #UFO #UAPDisclosure #UAPTransparency #UAPResearch #Science #BeyondInstitute

Jonathan Caplan KC, one of the speakers joining us in Stockholm on October 1st, speaking here with Sky News. This is exactly why Beyond Institute exists. We believe in transparency, openness and serious scientific inquiry. Working together with researchers and experts, we want to follow the evidence, ask the difficult questions and better understand the phenomena we are witnessing. No predetermined conclusions. No fear of where the evidence may lead. At some point, the penny has to drop. Keep your eyes open. Follow the evidence. The truth must prevail. #UAP #UFO #UAPDisclosure #UAPTransparency #UAPResearch #Science #BeyondInstitute

Dennis Asberg

13,415 views • 1 month ago

This one is from September 2, 2023. It is another case study on Fauci's method of prevarication. After devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". This is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either didn't understand how science works or he was lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci said gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. He did it throughout the pandemic, but especially with masks. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

This one is from September 2, 2023. It is another case study on Fauci's method of prevarication. After devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". This is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either didn't understand how science works or he was lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci said gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. He did it throughout the pandemic, but especially with masks. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

Kevin Bass

56,272 views • 1 month ago

Buttgieg: There's no clear definition of what victory even consists of. The president has said that we've already won and that we could be doing it for much, much longer. The truth is there is no way to know when this conflict will end, in particular, because there's no way to know when the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened. We heard Hegseth say, that the Strait of Hormuz is open, other than the fact that there are Iranians shooting at ships that try to go through it. As long as that remains true, there's going to be enormous uncertainty and pain at the pump for every American.

Buttgieg: There's no clear definition of what victory even consists of. The president has said that we've already won and that we could be doing it for much, much longer. The truth is there is no way to know when this conflict will end, in particular, because there's no way to know when the Strait of Hormuz will be reopened. We heard Hegseth say, that the Strait of Hormuz is open, other than the fact that there are Iranians shooting at ships that try to go through it. As long as that remains true, there's going to be enormous uncertainty and pain at the pump for every American.

Acyn

17,465 views • 6 months ago

Drop everything and watch this…. Buried in the desolate heart of Rajasthan, Bir-ka-Khazana Bawdi rises not merely as a relic of Bharat’s ancient hydrological mastery, but as an architectural cipher a structure that encodes the diameter of the Earth, the lunar distance, and mathematical constants that modern science claims as its own. A stepwell that doubles as a cosmic instrument. A water reservoir that is, in truth, a geometric manifesto. No one comes even an inch closer to Sanatan Dharma… We are the world.. Unfathomable. Unassailable. UNBELIEVABLE.

Drop everything and watch this…. Buried in the desolate heart of Rajasthan, Bir-ka-Khazana Bawdi rises not merely as a relic of Bharat’s ancient hydrological mastery, but as an architectural cipher a structure that encodes the diameter of the Earth, the lunar distance, and mathematical constants that modern science claims as its own. A stepwell that doubles as a cosmic instrument. A water reservoir that is, in truth, a geometric manifesto. No one comes even an inch closer to Sanatan Dharma… We are the world.. Unfathomable. Unassailable. UNBELIEVABLE.

Comman Man

48,152 views • 10 months ago

Drop everything and watch this…. Buried in the desolate heart of Rajasthan, Bir-ka-Khazana Bawdi rises not merely as a relic of Bharat’s ancient hydrological mastery, but as an architectural cipher a structure that encodes the diameter of the Earth, the lunar distance, and mathematical constants that modern science claims as its own. A stepwell that doubles as a cosmic instrument. A water reservoir that is, in truth, a geometric manifesto. No one comes even an inch closer to Sanatan Dharma… We are the world.. Unfathomable. Unassailable. UNBELIEVABLE

Drop everything and watch this…. Buried in the desolate heart of Rajasthan, Bir-ka-Khazana Bawdi rises not merely as a relic of Bharat’s ancient hydrological mastery, but as an architectural cipher a structure that encodes the diameter of the Earth, the lunar distance, and mathematical constants that modern science claims as its own. A stepwell that doubles as a cosmic instrument. A water reservoir that is, in truth, a geometric manifesto. No one comes even an inch closer to Sanatan Dharma… We are the world.. Unfathomable. Unassailable. UNBELIEVABLE

Comman Man

36,969 views • 9 months ago

Today on CNN, after devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". But this is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either doesn't understand how science works or he is lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci is saying gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he has communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

Today on CNN, after devastating study citations from the interviewer showing that masks don't work, Fauci responded: "but masks work on an individual level". But this is nonsense. Here's why. To do science on masks, you have a masked group and an unmasked group. You compare the rate of infection in each group. This is called a randomized trial. This is how science is done. If the rate of infection is the same, then masks don't work. This was what the studies on masks showed. No difference. Now, there is simply no such thing as scientific studies showing that "masks work at the individual level". Fauci either doesn't understand how science works or he is lying and making things up. It really is that simple. Fauci is saying gobbledygook in order to keep the idea of masks alive. It's incredibly shameful for Fauci to abuse science in this way. But it's par for the course in the way he has communicated science throughout the entire pandemic. Sad.

Kevin Bass

2,316,552 views • 3 years ago

Dr. Tracy Høeg (Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD) tells Congress that the highest quality scientific evidence has consistently shown that masks do not work, school closures were not necessary, and six feet of distancing was not based on science: "We've had evidence prior to the pandemic that masks were largely ineffective at preventing community transmission of influenza and other upper respiratory viruses, and we did not obtain any new high-quality evidence during COVID-19 that masks are an effective mitigation strategy. We have several confounded observational studies, many of which were actually published by the CDC, that have severe flaws in them, that unfortunately led people to believe that masking children was going to be effective and necessary to keep children in schools. But the highest quality data we have, for example, from a Cochrane review of randomized studies, has not found evidence that masks are effective. It wasn't science-based, and the six feet of distance was arbitrary... We should have by default kept our schools open, but instead, we required non-evidence-based mitigation strategies as a prerequisite for getting our children back into school."

Dr. Tracy Høeg (Tracy Beth Høeg, MD, PhD) tells Congress that the highest quality scientific evidence has consistently shown that masks do not work, school closures were not necessary, and six feet of distancing was not based on science: "We've had evidence prior to the pandemic that masks were largely ineffective at preventing community transmission of influenza and other upper respiratory viruses, and we did not obtain any new high-quality evidence during COVID-19 that masks are an effective mitigation strategy. We have several confounded observational studies, many of which were actually published by the CDC, that have severe flaws in them, that unfortunately led people to believe that masking children was going to be effective and necessary to keep children in schools. But the highest quality data we have, for example, from a Cochrane review of randomized studies, has not found evidence that masks are effective. It wasn't science-based, and the six feet of distance was arbitrary... We should have by default kept our schools open, but instead, we required non-evidence-based mitigation strategies as a prerequisite for getting our children back into school."

KanekoaTheGreat

1,134,598 views • 3 years ago

Germany’s Chancellor Merz on the future of Germany: Imagine that bureaucratic processes no longer take months but days. That permits are handled digitally, transparently, efficiently. That entrepreneurs no longer experience the state as a burden but as a partner. Not mistrust, but trust. Imagine that Germany remains an industrial nation — and precisely for that reason is a pioneer in climate protection. We will never allow climate protection and industry to become opposites. This is not a utopia. This is the reality of tomorrow, if we roll up our sleeves together and reform this country so that we have a chance to be at the front again.

Germany’s Chancellor Merz on the future of Germany: Imagine that bureaucratic processes no longer take months but days. That permits are handled digitally, transparently, efficiently. That entrepreneurs no longer experience the state as a burden but as a partner. Not mistrust, but trust. Imagine that Germany remains an industrial nation — and precisely for that reason is a pioneer in climate protection. We will never allow climate protection and industry to become opposites. This is not a utopia. This is the reality of tomorrow, if we roll up our sleeves together and reform this country so that we have a chance to be at the front again.

Clash Report

33,637 views • 4 months ago

Humans have been on this earth for at least 310,000 years. Yet mainstream history INSISTS our civilisation only started 6,000 years ago? That’s the exact timeline contradiction Graham Hancock has spent more than 30 years trying to unpick. Graham has sold millions of books and has a Netflix series. All built around one idea... That we are missing a huge chapter of our own history. When we sat down, Graham told me that he is about to undergo serious heart surgery. And, there is a 15% chance he may not survive the operation. With his future feeling uncertain, he wanted to come on the show for the opportunity to put his life's work, his philosophy and the biggest unanswered questions of human history on the record. Graham has been very vocal about how he thinks that mainstream science is dismissing and ignoring evidence rather than actively hiding it. We discussed things like: - A 12,800-year-old comet that forced humanity to restart. - Satellite imagery revealing a lost civilisation beneath the Amazon! - Ancient maps of the world that shouldn't exist… - The psychedelics that may have unlocked human consciousness. - Why everything we know about our origins could be wrong…? What was clear from our conversation, was that Graham isn’t afraid to go against the grain and challenge the official narrative. Whether you agree with his conclusions or not, I think there's something valuable about opening your mind in a way that’s just driven curiosity. As he told me, the most important lesson from his life's work is simple: Question everything. So, what if the story of who we are is much older, stranger and more fragile than we think?

Humans have been on this earth for at least 310,000 years. Yet mainstream history INSISTS our civilisation only started 6,000 years ago? That’s the exact timeline contradiction Graham Hancock has spent more than 30 years trying to unpick. Graham has sold millions of books and has a Netflix series. All built around one idea... That we are missing a huge chapter of our own history. When we sat down, Graham told me that he is about to undergo serious heart surgery. And, there is a 15% chance he may not survive the operation. With his future feeling uncertain, he wanted to come on the show for the opportunity to put his life's work, his philosophy and the biggest unanswered questions of human history on the record. Graham has been very vocal about how he thinks that mainstream science is dismissing and ignoring evidence rather than actively hiding it. We discussed things like: - A 12,800-year-old comet that forced humanity to restart. - Satellite imagery revealing a lost civilisation beneath the Amazon! - Ancient maps of the world that shouldn't exist… - The psychedelics that may have unlocked human consciousness. - Why everything we know about our origins could be wrong…? What was clear from our conversation, was that Graham isn’t afraid to go against the grain and challenge the official narrative. Whether you agree with his conclusions or not, I think there's something valuable about opening your mind in a way that’s just driven curiosity. As he told me, the most important lesson from his life's work is simple: Question everything. So, what if the story of who we are is much older, stranger and more fragile than we think?

Steven Bartlett

137,596 views • 3 months ago

The angular relationship between two edges of a pentagon is 108 degrees - a geometric property embedded in one of the most fundamental forms in sacred geometry. How long has that knowledge existed? Randall argues the accumulated evidence points in only one direction. Advanced civilizations existed in the deep human past - leaving very little record, but enough. Enough that approached from the right perspective the conclusion becomes difficult to avoid. Graham Hancock has been making that argument for decades and Randall notes the evidence is increasingly vindicating it. Human history is deeper and more complex than the mainstream has ever been willing to accommodate. The primary reason it took this long to recognize is the mirror problem - if an ancient civilization does not look like what we have already built, we do not recognize it as civilization at all. We are searching for our own reflection in the ancient record. That search is being overturned by evidence of a historical depth inseparably linked to repeated cycles of catastrophe that have reset the human story more than once.

The angular relationship between two edges of a pentagon is 108 degrees - a geometric property embedded in one of the most fundamental forms in sacred geometry. How long has that knowledge existed? Randall argues the accumulated evidence points in only one direction. Advanced civilizations existed in the deep human past - leaving very little record, but enough. Enough that approached from the right perspective the conclusion becomes difficult to avoid. Graham Hancock has been making that argument for decades and Randall notes the evidence is increasingly vindicating it. Human history is deeper and more complex than the mainstream has ever been willing to accommodate. The primary reason it took this long to recognize is the mirror problem - if an ancient civilization does not look like what we have already built, we do not recognize it as civilization at all. We are searching for our own reflection in the ancient record. That search is being overturned by evidence of a historical depth inseparably linked to repeated cycles of catastrophe that have reset the human story more than once.

Randall Carlson

12,809 views • 4 months ago