Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The angular relationship between two edges of a pentagon is 108 degrees - a geometric property embedded in one of the most fundamental forms in sacred geometry. How long has that knowledge existed? Randall argues the accumulated evidence points in only one direction. Advanced civilizations existed in the deep...

randallwcarlson's profile picture

Randall Carlson

168,797 subscribers

12,809 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

The model of human civilization as a steady, upward arc of progress is, according to Randall, fundamentally wrong - and the science to challenge it has been building for decades. Stephen Jay Gould's concept of punctuated equilibrium was developed to describe interruptions in the history of life itself, but Randall argues the model applies with equal force to the history of human civilization. Progress is not linear. It is periodically reset by events of extraordinary severity. What makes this reframing significant is the timescale Randall places it against. Modern humans - Homo sapiens sapiens - go back conservatively 150,000 years, with some skeletal remains now dating close to 200,000. Against that backdrop, the civilization we can account for represents a fraction of the time our species has existed on this planet. Randall’s point is that once you understand the true extent of past catastrophic events and the degree to which this planetary surface has been physically remodeled within the human timeline, the question is no longer whether previous civilizations were interrupted. It is how many times - and what was lost each time the reset came.
0:59

The model of human civilization as a steady, upward arc of progress is, according to Randall, fundamentally wrong - and the science to challenge it has been building for decades. Stephen Jay Gould's concept of punctuated equilibrium was developed to describe interruptions in the history of life itself, but Randall argues the model applies with equal force to the history of human civilization. Progress is not linear. It is periodically reset by events of extraordinary severity. What makes this reframing significant is the timescale Randall places it against. Modern humans - Homo sapiens sapiens - go back conservatively 150,000 years, with some skeletal remains now dating close to 200,000. Against that backdrop, the civilization we can account for represents a fraction of the time our species has existed on this planet. Randall’s point is that once you understand the true extent of past catastrophic events and the degree to which this planetary surface has been physically remodeled within the human timeline, the question is no longer whether previous civilizations were interrupted. It is how many times - and what was lost each time the reset came.

Randall Carlson

11,463 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The reason we can't find evidence of an advanced ancient civilization may have nothing to do with whether one existed - and everything to do with what we are looking for. Randall’s argument is direct. If the definition of civilization is held up as a mirror of what humanity has built in the last three to four centuries - scientific, industrial, recognizably modern - then anything that doesn't reflect that image back gets dismissed. The search is circular by design. Ben van Kerkwyk extends that argument into its most provocative implication. A previous advanced civilization could have progressed down an entirely different technological tree - solving the same fundamental problems through entirely different means, arriving at solutions that would look almost alien to modern eyes. Not primitive. Not undeveloped. Just different. Danny Jones distills the whole conversation into four words - we are looking for the wrong thing. Randall closes it honestly. Anything beyond that, he acknowledges, is speculation. But the framework itself - the willingness to look without the mirror - is where the real search has to begin.
1:18

The reason we can't find evidence of an advanced ancient civilization may have nothing to do with whether one existed - and everything to do with what we are looking for. Randall’s argument is direct. If the definition of civilization is held up as a mirror of what humanity has built in the last three to four centuries - scientific, industrial, recognizably modern - then anything that doesn't reflect that image back gets dismissed. The search is circular by design. Ben van Kerkwyk extends that argument into its most provocative implication. A previous advanced civilization could have progressed down an entirely different technological tree - solving the same fundamental problems through entirely different means, arriving at solutions that would look almost alien to modern eyes. Not primitive. Not undeveloped. Just different. Danny Jones distills the whole conversation into four words - we are looking for the wrong thing. Randall closes it honestly. Anything beyond that, he acknowledges, is speculation. But the framework itself - the willingness to look without the mirror - is where the real search has to begin.

Randall Carlson

38,780 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The assumption that Earth operates as a largely self-contained system - affected by its own geology, its own climate cycles, its own biological processes - is one Randall argues we need to outgrow. This planet is embedded in a cosmic environment, and the evidence that the cosmic domain impinges on the terrestrial far more frequently than previously imagined is now beyond ambiguity. The ancient peoples who were obsessed with the sky were not engaged in superstition. They were paying attention to something that modern science is only now catching up to. The solar constant - the assumed stability of energy output from the sun - is not nearly as constant as the name implies. Randall argues that a significant portion of the changes happening on Earth, changes that are routinely attributed to purely terrestrial causes, are connected to fluctuations and events in the cosmic domain of which Earth is a part. The sky that ancient cultures watched with such intensity was not a backdrop to human history. It was an active participant in it - and Randall argues that thinking cosmically is not an abstract philosophical exercise. It is the only framework large enough to accurately account for what has been happening on this planet throughout human history and what continues to happen now. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!
0:48

The assumption that Earth operates as a largely self-contained system - affected by its own geology, its own climate cycles, its own biological processes - is one Randall argues we need to outgrow. This planet is embedded in a cosmic environment, and the evidence that the cosmic domain impinges on the terrestrial far more frequently than previously imagined is now beyond ambiguity. The ancient peoples who were obsessed with the sky were not engaged in superstition. They were paying attention to something that modern science is only now catching up to. The solar constant - the assumed stability of energy output from the sun - is not nearly as constant as the name implies. Randall argues that a significant portion of the changes happening on Earth, changes that are routinely attributed to purely terrestrial causes, are connected to fluctuations and events in the cosmic domain of which Earth is a part. The sky that ancient cultures watched with such intensity was not a backdrop to human history. It was an active participant in it - and Randall argues that thinking cosmically is not an abstract philosophical exercise. It is the only framework large enough to accurately account for what has been happening on this planet throughout human history and what continues to happen now. Spots are limited - click here to join Randall on his upcoming Finger Lakes tour!

Randall Carlson

14,458 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The water erosion visible on the Sphinx is not a minor detail or a contested footnote. It is a geological clock - and Randall reads it directly. The last time significant rainfall occurred in the region of the Giza Plateau was approximately 10,000 years ago. If the erosion pattern on the Sphinx was produced by water rather than wind and sand, as the evidence strongly suggests, then the structure has to be at least that old. Randall states he is 100% on board with that minimum date. The emphasis, however, is on the word minimum. Randall’s position is that the Sphinx is much, much older than 10,000 years - placing it potentially in the same company as the most ancient megalithic remains he has encountered in his exploration, including the extraordinary stonework at Baalbek. The rainfall record gives a floor. The geology, the construction style, and the broader context of what Randall has been finding across multiple ancient sites suggest the ceiling is considerably higher than mainstream archaeology has ever been willing to acknowledge. The Sphinx was not built at the dawn of Egyptian civilization. It may have been ancient even to the ancient Egyptians.
0:38

The water erosion visible on the Sphinx is not a minor detail or a contested footnote. It is a geological clock - and Randall reads it directly. The last time significant rainfall occurred in the region of the Giza Plateau was approximately 10,000 years ago. If the erosion pattern on the Sphinx was produced by water rather than wind and sand, as the evidence strongly suggests, then the structure has to be at least that old. Randall states he is 100% on board with that minimum date. The emphasis, however, is on the word minimum. Randall’s position is that the Sphinx is much, much older than 10,000 years - placing it potentially in the same company as the most ancient megalithic remains he has encountered in his exploration, including the extraordinary stonework at Baalbek. The rainfall record gives a floor. The geology, the construction style, and the broader context of what Randall has been finding across multiple ancient sites suggest the ceiling is considerably higher than mainstream archaeology has ever been willing to acknowledge. The Sphinx was not built at the dawn of Egyptian civilization. It may have been ancient even to the ancient Egyptians.

Randall Carlson

18,513 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Here is a video that challenges our understanding of human intelligence and progress. Judging by the ancient images, it seems that we are not so unique when it comes to technology. The poses of people reminiscent of using tablets and the drawings depicting car-like vehicles and aeroplanes suggest that all this existed in the past? We may not be the first to have achieved such technological progress. What if other civilisations had already travelled the same path of development and thinking that we are going through now? It is very likely that we are just a repeated link in an infinite chain. History, as we know, is often rewritten and we only have fragments of knowledge of the past. Think about it, what if all that we consider our own achievement was actually the path of ancient knowledge and technology undertaken by someone else, which we are rediscovering for ourselves?😉
0:44

Here is a video that challenges our understanding of human intelligence and progress. Judging by the ancient images, it seems that we are not so unique when it comes to technology. The poses of people reminiscent of using tablets and the drawings depicting car-like vehicles and aeroplanes suggest that all this existed in the past? We may not be the first to have achieved such technological progress. What if other civilisations had already travelled the same path of development and thinking that we are going through now? It is very likely that we are just a repeated link in an infinite chain. History, as we know, is often rewritten and we only have fragments of knowledge of the past. Think about it, what if all that we consider our own achievement was actually the path of ancient knowledge and technology undertaken by someone else, which we are rediscovering for ourselves?😉

Andy

61,959 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The inch derives from the width of a human thumb. The foot from the length of a human foot. The pace, the cubit, the furlong - each unit in the ancient measurement system traces back to a dimension of the human body, connecting the geometry of human anatomy directly to the geometry of the built world. Randall makes this concrete and physical - he has laid out 660 feet in an open field, marked a single inch at one end, and demonstrated the relationship firsthand. These are not abstract units. They are embodied ones. The ratio Randall arrives at is where the argument crystallizes. The furlong is to the inch as the Earth is to a mile. That relationship is not a coincidence of historical accident - it is evidence of a measurement system deliberately constructed to encode the dimensions of the planet into the units of human scale. The same system that begins with the width of a thumb ends with the circumference of the Earth, and every unit in between maintains a precise proportional relationship to both. Randall’s broader argument throughout his research converges here - the ancient world did not measure things arbitrarily. It built a system in which the human body, the sacred structure, and the planet itself were all expressions of the same underlying geometric order.
0:45

The inch derives from the width of a human thumb. The foot from the length of a human foot. The pace, the cubit, the furlong - each unit in the ancient measurement system traces back to a dimension of the human body, connecting the geometry of human anatomy directly to the geometry of the built world. Randall makes this concrete and physical - he has laid out 660 feet in an open field, marked a single inch at one end, and demonstrated the relationship firsthand. These are not abstract units. They are embodied ones. The ratio Randall arrives at is where the argument crystallizes. The furlong is to the inch as the Earth is to a mile. That relationship is not a coincidence of historical accident - it is evidence of a measurement system deliberately constructed to encode the dimensions of the planet into the units of human scale. The same system that begins with the width of a thumb ends with the circumference of the Earth, and every unit in between maintains a precise proportional relationship to both. Randall’s broader argument throughout his research converges here - the ancient world did not measure things arbitrarily. It built a system in which the human body, the sacred structure, and the planet itself were all expressions of the same underlying geometric order.

Randall Carlson

24,317 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The Freemasons did not invent the title of Great Architect for God arbitrarily. Randall traces it to a specific and ancient understanding - that the universe was built according to geometry, that all of creation carries that geometry inherently within it, and that the role of the master builder was not to express personal creativity but to replicate the processes by which God constructed reality itself. The grand geometric mean - another name Randall notes the Freemasons apply to the divine - points to the same conclusion. Mathematics and divinity were never separate categories in this tradition. They were the same thing viewed from different angles. What Randall finds most compelling is the point at which observation overtakes skepticism. The geometry is there. It appears in the proportions of living organisms, in the structure of galaxies, in the dimensions of ancient monuments, and in the relationships between celestial bodies. Randall’s position is straightforward - there is a threshold beyond which dismissing this as coincidence is no longer intellectually honest. Once you begin looking for the geometry of creation, it becomes impossible to stop finding it. The ancient master builders understood that - and everything they built was a deliberate act of alignment with a geometric order they believed was not invented by human minds but discovered within a universe that was already built that way from the beginning.
0:33

The Freemasons did not invent the title of Great Architect for God arbitrarily. Randall traces it to a specific and ancient understanding - that the universe was built according to geometry, that all of creation carries that geometry inherently within it, and that the role of the master builder was not to express personal creativity but to replicate the processes by which God constructed reality itself. The grand geometric mean - another name Randall notes the Freemasons apply to the divine - points to the same conclusion. Mathematics and divinity were never separate categories in this tradition. They were the same thing viewed from different angles. What Randall finds most compelling is the point at which observation overtakes skepticism. The geometry is there. It appears in the proportions of living organisms, in the structure of galaxies, in the dimensions of ancient monuments, and in the relationships between celestial bodies. Randall’s position is straightforward - there is a threshold beyond which dismissing this as coincidence is no longer intellectually honest. Once you begin looking for the geometry of creation, it becomes impossible to stop finding it. The ancient master builders understood that - and everything they built was a deliberate act of alignment with a geometric order they believed was not invented by human minds but discovered within a universe that was already built that way from the beginning.

Randall Carlson

11,848 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

This may be the strongest evidence for the location of Atlantis yet. Independent geologist Randall Carlson just visited the Azores. And he revealed to Graham Hancock why he’s convinced this was most likely the heart of ancient Atlantean civilization: “There’s definitely evidence that’s consistent with catastrophic episodes in the recent geological past.” “After a detailed reading of multiple translations of Plato’s two relevant dialogues, Timaeus and Critias, and having some knowledge of the marine geology … it looks to me like of all the possible candidates that have been proposed for the locus of the Atlantean civilization, the one that seems to fit Plato’s very precise details … the most, in my mind, is the Azores.” “It has a lot of the earmarks of having undergone catastrophic subsidence in the very recent geological past.” “Plato’s description of geography is very consistent, beyond the west of the Pillars of Heracles, you encounter islands, and then beyond those is the island complex of Atlantis.” “And then beyond that, as he describes it, is the true continent—” Hancock: “Which we have to read as the Americas.” Carlson: “The nine islands of the Azores have their roots in the microcontinent, as it’s called, and they’re essentially mountains … whose peaks are above sea level.” “We had a professional geologist traveling with us, and he admitted, yes, there is evidence here that would be more consistent with a continental bedrock than oceanic bedrock.” Graham Hancock Randall Carlson
5:44

This may be the strongest evidence for the location of Atlantis yet. Independent geologist Randall Carlson just visited the Azores. And he revealed to Graham Hancock why he’s convinced this was most likely the heart of ancient Atlantean civilization: “There’s definitely evidence that’s consistent with catastrophic episodes in the recent geological past.” “After a detailed reading of multiple translations of Plato’s two relevant dialogues, Timaeus and Critias, and having some knowledge of the marine geology … it looks to me like of all the possible candidates that have been proposed for the locus of the Atlantean civilization, the one that seems to fit Plato’s very precise details … the most, in my mind, is the Azores.” “It has a lot of the earmarks of having undergone catastrophic subsidence in the very recent geological past.” “Plato’s description of geography is very consistent, beyond the west of the Pillars of Heracles, you encounter islands, and then beyond those is the island complex of Atlantis.” “And then beyond that, as he describes it, is the true continent—” Hancock: “Which we have to read as the Americas.” Carlson: “The nine islands of the Azores have their roots in the microcontinent, as it’s called, and they’re essentially mountains … whose peaks are above sea level.” “We had a professional geologist traveling with us, and he admitted, yes, there is evidence here that would be more consistent with a continental bedrock than oceanic bedrock.” Graham Hancock Randall Carlson

Holden Culotta

51,789 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The thought experiment Randall poses is deliberately visceral. Drop an atomic bomb on a city and obliterate it. Then drop another on the same location. Now wait 10,000 years - or 20,000. What remains? What would an archaeologist looking at that site even recognize as artificial? The answer Randall builds toward is the one that undermines one of the most common objections to the existence of advanced ancient civilizations - that we would have found the evidence by now. The geological process Randall describes is precise. The rubble of an obliterated city, given sufficient time, gets reincorporated into the geological stratum - compacted, cemented, and reconstituted into what geologists call conglomerate rock. A jumble of broken material cemented together. Within that conglomerate could be fragments of an advanced civilization that no researcher would recognize as artificial, because nothing in the conventional framework would prompt them to look for it. The absence of recognizable ruins is not proof that nothing was there. It may simply be proof that enough time has passed to make the evidence invisible to eyes that don't know what they are looking for.
0:41

The thought experiment Randall poses is deliberately visceral. Drop an atomic bomb on a city and obliterate it. Then drop another on the same location. Now wait 10,000 years - or 20,000. What remains? What would an archaeologist looking at that site even recognize as artificial? The answer Randall builds toward is the one that undermines one of the most common objections to the existence of advanced ancient civilizations - that we would have found the evidence by now. The geological process Randall describes is precise. The rubble of an obliterated city, given sufficient time, gets reincorporated into the geological stratum - compacted, cemented, and reconstituted into what geologists call conglomerate rock. A jumble of broken material cemented together. Within that conglomerate could be fragments of an advanced civilization that no researcher would recognize as artificial, because nothing in the conventional framework would prompt them to look for it. The absence of recognizable ruins is not proof that nothing was there. It may simply be proof that enough time has passed to make the evidence invisible to eyes that don't know what they are looking for.

Randall Carlson

44,027 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The ten Sumerian kings who reigned before the Great Flood are recorded as having ruled for a combined total of 432,000 years. Randall is clear that he doesn't take that figure literally - no individual king reigned for 43,200 years. However, the number itself is where the real argument begins. That same numerical sequence is embedded throughout the way modern civilization measures time and space. The moon's diameter is 2,160 miles - precisely half of 4,320, and double 1,080. The recurrence of that figure across Sumerian kingship lists and contemporary astronomical measurement is not coincidental. What Randall draws attention to next is the origin of the mile itself. It is not an arbitrary unit. It derives ultimately from human anatomy and the geometric proportions of the human body - which connects it to the same tradition of sacred geometry and human-cosmic correspondence that Randall traces across multiple ancient cultures. The implication is significant. If the numbers embedded in Sumerian myth are the same numbers encoded in our most basic units of measurement, and if those units trace back to human geometry, then the knowledge system that produced the Sumerian king lists and the one that produced our measurement conventions may share a common and much older source.
0:49

The ten Sumerian kings who reigned before the Great Flood are recorded as having ruled for a combined total of 432,000 years. Randall is clear that he doesn't take that figure literally - no individual king reigned for 43,200 years. However, the number itself is where the real argument begins. That same numerical sequence is embedded throughout the way modern civilization measures time and space. The moon's diameter is 2,160 miles - precisely half of 4,320, and double 1,080. The recurrence of that figure across Sumerian kingship lists and contemporary astronomical measurement is not coincidental. What Randall draws attention to next is the origin of the mile itself. It is not an arbitrary unit. It derives ultimately from human anatomy and the geometric proportions of the human body - which connects it to the same tradition of sacred geometry and human-cosmic correspondence that Randall traces across multiple ancient cultures. The implication is significant. If the numbers embedded in Sumerian myth are the same numbers encoded in our most basic units of measurement, and if those units trace back to human geometry, then the knowledge system that produced the Sumerian king lists and the one that produced our measurement conventions may share a common and much older source.

Randall Carlson

101,602 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Graham Hancock reveals that over 300 ancient myths assert a “global cataclysm” destroyed a “golden age” of civilization thousands of years ago. The evidence for Atlantis goes much deeper than you think. And the evidence of a global flood around 11,600 years ago is only getting stronger. Randall Carlson: “When you bring the geophysics into it … it is the rapid melting of the ice sheets, not only North American, but also the North European.” “The timing suggests that the catastrophic melting of both sheets happened in a series of huge pulses of meltwater.” “The final pulse of that meltwater, meltwater pulse 1B … is dated 11,600 years ago.” “Plato told us that 2,300 years ago.” Hancock: “In the ancient Persian accounts, what is described is less of a flood and more of an incredible deep freeze from which people must seek shelter by digging underground.” Carlson: “I even speculate there was a preliminary catastrophe associated with meltwater pulse 1A that could have happened about 14,600.” Hancock: “If there was a lost civilization, that earlier event would have … made them pay attention to all of this, and to be in some state of preparedness when the real cataclysms of the Younger Dryas took place.” Follow Holden Culotta Graham Hancock Randall Carlson
4:45

Graham Hancock reveals that over 300 ancient myths assert a “global cataclysm” destroyed a “golden age” of civilization thousands of years ago. The evidence for Atlantis goes much deeper than you think. And the evidence of a global flood around 11,600 years ago is only getting stronger. Randall Carlson: “When you bring the geophysics into it … it is the rapid melting of the ice sheets, not only North American, but also the North European.” “The timing suggests that the catastrophic melting of both sheets happened in a series of huge pulses of meltwater.” “The final pulse of that meltwater, meltwater pulse 1B … is dated 11,600 years ago.” “Plato told us that 2,300 years ago.” Hancock: “In the ancient Persian accounts, what is described is less of a flood and more of an incredible deep freeze from which people must seek shelter by digging underground.” Carlson: “I even speculate there was a preliminary catastrophe associated with meltwater pulse 1A that could have happened about 14,600.” Hancock: “If there was a lost civilization, that earlier event would have … made them pay attention to all of this, and to be in some state of preparedness when the real cataclysms of the Younger Dryas took place.” Follow Holden Culotta Graham Hancock Randall Carlson

Holden Culotta

69,109 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

The latest skeletal evidence places anatomically modern humans on Earth somewhere between 180,000 and 200,000 years ago. That is approximately 7,000 generations of people biologically identical to us - with the same brains, the same cognitive capacity, and presumably the same drive to organise, build, and innovate. And yet, by the conventional account, civilisation only appeared in the last few hundred generations. The question Randall Carlson raises is not rhetorical. It is one of the most uncomfortable in all of science. How is it that across all those long generations, nothing we would recognise as civilisation took root and flourished? The most parsimonious answer, Randall argues, may not be that civilisation simply hadn't started yet. It may be that it had - and that what we are living in now is not the origin of human civilisation, but its reboot.
0:52

The latest skeletal evidence places anatomically modern humans on Earth somewhere between 180,000 and 200,000 years ago. That is approximately 7,000 generations of people biologically identical to us - with the same brains, the same cognitive capacity, and presumably the same drive to organise, build, and innovate. And yet, by the conventional account, civilisation only appeared in the last few hundred generations. The question Randall Carlson raises is not rhetorical. It is one of the most uncomfortable in all of science. How is it that across all those long generations, nothing we would recognise as civilisation took root and flourished? The most parsimonious answer, Randall argues, may not be that civilisation simply hadn't started yet. It may be that it had - and that what we are living in now is not the origin of human civilisation, but its reboot.

Randall Carlson

582,115 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

The Giza Celestial Code The location of the pyramids on the Giza plateau has long been a matter of debate, but the true nature of their placement has been kept under wraps. Today, it is known that the tops of these structures precisely follow the configuration of Orion's Belt. This is not just aesthetics - we are talking about the most subtle astronomical calculations, performed with millimeter accuracy. The ancient builders possessed knowledge that is generally considered inaccessible to that era. This proves that human history is much more complex than is commonly thought...
1:00

The Giza Celestial Code The location of the pyramids on the Giza plateau has long been a matter of debate, but the true nature of their placement has been kept under wraps. Today, it is known that the tops of these structures precisely follow the configuration of Orion's Belt. This is not just aesthetics - we are talking about the most subtle astronomical calculations, performed with millimeter accuracy. The ancient builders possessed knowledge that is generally considered inaccessible to that era. This proves that human history is much more complex than is commonly thought...

Black Hole

22,903 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

President Trump reminded the World Economic Forum that the West didn’t rise to greatness by accident — it was built on a culture worth defending. Trump told the elites at Davos that Western civilization isn’t negotiable, and preserving it is a responsibility. TRUMP: “The explosion of prosperity and conclusion and progress that built the West did not come from our tax codes.” “It ultimately came from our very special culture.” “This is the precious inheritance that America and Europe have in common. We share it. We share it. But we have to keep it strong.” “We have to become stronger, more successful and more prosperous than ever.” “We have to defend that culture and rediscover the spirit that lifted the West from the depths of the dark ages to the pinnacle of human achievement.” “We live in an incredible changing period. It’s an unbelievable time, but we have to take advantage of the time that we’re in.”
1:18

President Trump reminded the World Economic Forum that the West didn’t rise to greatness by accident — it was built on a culture worth defending. Trump told the elites at Davos that Western civilization isn’t negotiable, and preserving it is a responsibility. TRUMP: “The explosion of prosperity and conclusion and progress that built the West did not come from our tax codes.” “It ultimately came from our very special culture.” “This is the precious inheritance that America and Europe have in common. We share it. We share it. But we have to keep it strong.” “We have to become stronger, more successful and more prosperous than ever.” “We have to defend that culture and rediscover the spirit that lifted the West from the depths of the dark ages to the pinnacle of human achievement.” “We live in an incredible changing period. It’s an unbelievable time, but we have to take advantage of the time that we’re in.”

Overton

35,801 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

“We are a species with amnesia.” Graham Hancock says a massive forgotten chapter of human history was destroyed by a global cataclysm. We’ve been told civilization only started around 6,000 years ago. But Hancock argues there’s strong evidence of a sophisticated lost civilization at least 20,000 years ago — a golden age with “no violence, no cruelty,” where great healers and sages flourished. The ancient myths record a gigantic cataclysm — a great flood told in hundreds of cultures, from Noah to Atlantis — that almost completely wiped out the human race. “We have forgotten something very important in our own past.” According to Graham Hancock, archaeology has “failed miserably in providing a nurturing satisfying answer to the questions we all have.”
3:42

“We are a species with amnesia.” Graham Hancock says a massive forgotten chapter of human history was destroyed by a global cataclysm. We’ve been told civilization only started around 6,000 years ago. But Hancock argues there’s strong evidence of a sophisticated lost civilization at least 20,000 years ago — a golden age with “no violence, no cruelty,” where great healers and sages flourished. The ancient myths record a gigantic cataclysm — a great flood told in hundreds of cultures, from Noah to Atlantis — that almost completely wiped out the human race. “We have forgotten something very important in our own past.” According to Graham Hancock, archaeology has “failed miserably in providing a nurturing satisfying answer to the questions we all have.”

Defiant Ghost

21,609 просмотров • 24 дней назад

Randall holds a position that he frames not as speculation but as a scientific probability - levitation was a genuine technological reality for ancient cultures, and the evidence for it is hiding in plain sight within the most well known sacred object in biblical history. The Ark of the Covenant was sheathed in gold, making it extraordinarily heavy - and yet the accounts are consistent that no one could touch it directly. It was carried on staves by a single tribe, the Levites, the only one among the twelve tribes of Israel permitted to transport it. The linguistic detail Randall encountered while studying mystery traditions like Kabbalah - traditions that hold hidden meanings within language itself - stopped him in his tracks. Levites. Levitation. He presents it not as definitive proof but as the kind of coincidence that, once noticed, refuses to be dismissed. A tribe whose name encodes the very phenomenon that would explain how they moved an object too heavy and too dangerous for ordinary human handling - chosen specifically and exclusively for that task - is a detail Randall argues deserves considerably more scrutiny than it has received. The Kabbalah tradition's insistence that words conceal their deepest meanings may, in this case, have preserved a technical truth hidden in a name for thousands of years.
0:42

Randall holds a position that he frames not as speculation but as a scientific probability - levitation was a genuine technological reality for ancient cultures, and the evidence for it is hiding in plain sight within the most well known sacred object in biblical history. The Ark of the Covenant was sheathed in gold, making it extraordinarily heavy - and yet the accounts are consistent that no one could touch it directly. It was carried on staves by a single tribe, the Levites, the only one among the twelve tribes of Israel permitted to transport it. The linguistic detail Randall encountered while studying mystery traditions like Kabbalah - traditions that hold hidden meanings within language itself - stopped him in his tracks. Levites. Levitation. He presents it not as definitive proof but as the kind of coincidence that, once noticed, refuses to be dismissed. A tribe whose name encodes the very phenomenon that would explain how they moved an object too heavy and too dangerous for ordinary human handling - chosen specifically and exclusively for that task - is a detail Randall argues deserves considerably more scrutiny than it has received. The Kabbalah tradition's insistence that words conceal their deepest meanings may, in this case, have preserved a technical truth hidden in a name for thousands of years.

Randall Carlson

51,157 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.
0:45

The fingerprints of an advanced predecessor culture are visible across the ancient world. Randall’s question is not whether they exist - he considers the evidence for that overwhelming - but who left them, and what the nature of their knowledge actually was. The term he reaches for is sacred science - a deliberate fusion of what modern thinking has artificially separated into religion and physics, spirituality and technology. That separation, Randall argues, is a recent invention. It did not exist in the knowledge systems of the cultures that preceded us. The framework Randall builds on is Arthur C. Clarke's observation that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic - and by extension, from the miraculous. A civilization practicing sacred science would have produced phenomena that later cultures could only interpret through a spiritual lens, because the scientific framework needed to recognize it as technology had been lost along with everything else. Randall’s position is that this is precisely what happened - that predecessor cultures were operating within a unified system where science and spirituality were a single discipline, and that the fingerprints they left behind are the residue of that holy science waiting to be correctly read.

Randall Carlson

11,737 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Humans have been on this earth for at least 310,000 years. Yet mainstream history INSISTS our civilisation only started 6,000 years ago? That’s the exact timeline contradiction Graham Hancock has spent more than 30 years trying to unpick. Graham has sold millions of books and has a Netflix series. All built around one idea... That we are missing a huge chapter of our own history. When we sat down, Graham told me that he is about to undergo serious heart surgery. And, there is a 15% chance he may not survive the operation. With his future feeling uncertain, he wanted to come on the show for the opportunity to put his life's work, his philosophy and the biggest unanswered questions of human history on the record. Graham has been very vocal about how he thinks that mainstream science is dismissing and ignoring evidence rather than actively hiding it. We discussed things like: - A 12,800-year-old comet that forced humanity to restart. - Satellite imagery revealing a lost civilisation beneath the Amazon! - Ancient maps of the world that shouldn't exist… - The psychedelics that may have unlocked human consciousness. - Why everything we know about our origins could be wrong…? What was clear from our conversation, was that Graham isn’t afraid to go against the grain and challenge the official narrative. Whether you agree with his conclusions or not, I think there's something valuable about opening your mind in a way that’s just driven curiosity. As he told me, the most important lesson from his life's work is simple: Question everything. So, what if the story of who we are is much older, stranger and more fragile than we think?
1:40

Humans have been on this earth for at least 310,000 years. Yet mainstream history INSISTS our civilisation only started 6,000 years ago? That’s the exact timeline contradiction Graham Hancock has spent more than 30 years trying to unpick. Graham has sold millions of books and has a Netflix series. All built around one idea... That we are missing a huge chapter of our own history. When we sat down, Graham told me that he is about to undergo serious heart surgery. And, there is a 15% chance he may not survive the operation. With his future feeling uncertain, he wanted to come on the show for the opportunity to put his life's work, his philosophy and the biggest unanswered questions of human history on the record. Graham has been very vocal about how he thinks that mainstream science is dismissing and ignoring evidence rather than actively hiding it. We discussed things like: - A 12,800-year-old comet that forced humanity to restart. - Satellite imagery revealing a lost civilisation beneath the Amazon! - Ancient maps of the world that shouldn't exist… - The psychedelics that may have unlocked human consciousness. - Why everything we know about our origins could be wrong…? What was clear from our conversation, was that Graham isn’t afraid to go against the grain and challenge the official narrative. Whether you agree with his conclusions or not, I think there's something valuable about opening your mind in a way that’s just driven curiosity. As he told me, the most important lesson from his life's work is simple: Question everything. So, what if the story of who we are is much older, stranger and more fragile than we think?

Steven Bartlett

135,752 просмотров • 26 дней назад

Taken individually, any single ancient monument can be explained away as a feat of organized labor and brute force. Randall’s argument is that when you take the full picture in totality - the scale, the precision, the sacred geometry, and the global distribution of structures built from stones weighing ten tons or more - a different conclusion forces itself. There is a common system at work. These cultures shared a body of knowledge that we have forgotten, and that knowledge included something that made the manipulation of very large stones considerably easier than simple muscular effort would allow. The question Randall poses is direct - is the sacred geometry embedded in these structures merely an homage to a king's ego, a decorative impulse scaled up in stone? He dismisses that explanation not with contempt but with logic. The consistency of the system across cultures with no documented contact, the precision of the geometry, and the physical improbability of the construction methods conventionally proposed all point in the same direction. What was being built was not a monument to human vanity. It was an application of a knowledge system sophisticated enough to make the seemingly impossible routine - and whatever that system was, its loss is one of the most significant gaps in our understanding of what our predecessors were actually capable of.
0:35

Taken individually, any single ancient monument can be explained away as a feat of organized labor and brute force. Randall’s argument is that when you take the full picture in totality - the scale, the precision, the sacred geometry, and the global distribution of structures built from stones weighing ten tons or more - a different conclusion forces itself. There is a common system at work. These cultures shared a body of knowledge that we have forgotten, and that knowledge included something that made the manipulation of very large stones considerably easier than simple muscular effort would allow. The question Randall poses is direct - is the sacred geometry embedded in these structures merely an homage to a king's ego, a decorative impulse scaled up in stone? He dismisses that explanation not with contempt but with logic. The consistency of the system across cultures with no documented contact, the precision of the geometry, and the physical improbability of the construction methods conventionally proposed all point in the same direction. What was being built was not a monument to human vanity. It was an application of a knowledge system sophisticated enough to make the seemingly impossible routine - and whatever that system was, its loss is one of the most significant gaps in our understanding of what our predecessors were actually capable of.

Randall Carlson

14,080 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

What we see at Giza today is not what was built. Randall makes that point plainly - what remains is the ruin of something far more impressive. Khufu's pyramid was originally sheathed in highly polished white limestone, with extraordinarily tight joinery between every individual block. Approaching across the landscape - which Randall notes may not even have been desert at the time - the structure would have blazed white in the distance. The monument we study today is stripped of that outer casing entirely, leaving only the core that was never meant to be seen. That visual reframing matters because it resets the question of who built these structures and why. Randall is careful with the conventional chronology - Djoser's pyramid as the first prototype, Khufu's arriving a couple of generations later - but he holds it loosely, noting that these sequences reflect some theories more than settled fact. The deeper question he is circling is the identity of the antecedent civilization that may have been responsible. A structure precise enough to demand tight-jointed polished limestone casing across its entire surface was not built by a civilization in its infancy. It was built by one that had already mastered everything required to produce it.
1:03

What we see at Giza today is not what was built. Randall makes that point plainly - what remains is the ruin of something far more impressive. Khufu's pyramid was originally sheathed in highly polished white limestone, with extraordinarily tight joinery between every individual block. Approaching across the landscape - which Randall notes may not even have been desert at the time - the structure would have blazed white in the distance. The monument we study today is stripped of that outer casing entirely, leaving only the core that was never meant to be seen. That visual reframing matters because it resets the question of who built these structures and why. Randall is careful with the conventional chronology - Djoser's pyramid as the first prototype, Khufu's arriving a couple of generations later - but he holds it loosely, noting that these sequences reflect some theories more than settled fact. The deeper question he is circling is the identity of the antecedent civilization that may have been responsible. A structure precise enough to demand tight-jointed polished limestone casing across its entire surface was not built by a civilization in its infancy. It was built by one that had already mastered everything required to produce it.

Randall Carlson

52,324 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад