Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Mainstream archeologists want to cram the whole architectural timeline into a period less than 500 years old. I travelled to Peru to challenge that position. The Bronze tool using Inca attempted to replicate what they saw in the older megalithic work.

25,746 Aufrufe • vor 5 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

14 Kommentare

Profilbild von Jay Anderson
Jay Andersonvor 5 Tagen

OUT NOW: ANCIENT TECHNOLOGIES EPISODE 8! I'm high up in the Andes Mountains, showing you the evidence for lost civilisations that mainstream historians and archeologists choose to ignore!

Profilbild von Rex⚡Volt
Rex⚡Voltvor 5 Tagen

That's not 15th century

Profilbild von Jersey MAGA 🇺🇸
Jersey MAGA 🇺🇸vor 5 Tagen

I cannot wait until their forced to change their fkn narrative

Profilbild von BIZKIT
BIZKITvor 5 Tagen

The new videos epic, thanks bro

Profilbild von ADFortes 🏳️‍🌈
ADFortes 🏳️‍🌈vor 5 Tagen

I think the question is how to demonstrate scientifically the true age of these megalithic structures. There is a lot of very telling evidence around machining and precision, and global similarities that strongly suggest a global megalithic culture at some time before recorded history. Gobekli Tepe's burial allowed radiometric dating, that shows us a significant outlier from known or suspected capabilities at a time when the Earth was emerging from a glacial epoch. But how to show where the polygonal masonry fits in the timeline and show how it was done. Speaking as someone with a mineralogical background, I would dearly love to see thin sections (technically, a 30 micron thick slice on slide that can be examined under a microscopy in cross polarized light) and specimens for electron microscopy from the margins of the blocks to evaluate the hypothesis of softening by chemicals or heat, geopolymer theories, and maybe see if any kind of luminescence dating could be applied.

Profilbild von Kane
Kanevor 4 Tagen

huh that's wild bro hehe

Profilbild von Diego Rincon
Diego Rinconvor 4 Tagen

F* them up!

Profilbild von 🇮🇶☀️مرتزا X
🇮🇶☀️مرتزا Xvor 5 Tagen

👑🌼

Profilbild von Korr Neuro
Korr Neurovor 4 Tagen

All inherited from a much older civilisation. 25,000+

Profilbild von drew van tuyl
drew van tuylvor 4 Tagen

Attempted and failed. The dynastic Egyptians were much more successful at emulating the megalithic and precision work that they found.

Profilbild von MoonriseBill
MoonriseBillvor 4 Tagen

It took less then quantum hundred from when we learnt to fly to get to the moon... the practical answer as to why this happened is the world was alot more interconnected back then, then we thought

Profilbild von Todd Carson
Todd Carsonvor 5 Tagen

MAINSTREAM ARCHEOS ARE RUBBISH YOUR HISTORY IS INTENTIONALLY HIDDEN AND DISTORTED THESE WERE OBVIOUSLY NOT BUILT BY A HUNTER GATHERER CIV NOR WERE THE WORLD WIDE NETWORK OF PYRAMIDS, MANY OF WHICH ARE POWER GENERATORS

Profilbild von Ketzahl
Ketzahlvor 4 Tagen

if it's so recent, why the natives there can't do it anymore?

Profilbild von Justin Jackson
Justin Jacksonvor 4 Tagen

Mainstream archeology is just stuck.

Ähnliche Videos

🚨This One Thing DESTROYS The Narrative! Once you absorb this simple fact, you can't actually deny how illogical the mainstream historical narrative is here: Walking around Ollantaytambo in Perus Sacred Valley, you find huge megalithic blocks of rose quartz granite strewn across the hillside, like they were blown over with tremendous force. Some of the megalithic work is still intact but most of it has been severely damaged. Then we see simplistic, rough-cut stone walls and structures that are STILL STANDING. These walls use mud and simple mortar as a binding agent, unlike the megalithic work they are not in the least bit resistant to significant kinetic force, you see these simple stone wall techniques tucked into cracks and corners where megalithic work has been damaged/moved, i.e RESTORATION, clear, evidential restoration attempts with significantly inferior stone building techniques. I could take these simple walls down with a sledgehammer. I couldn't take some of the surviving megalithic walls down with a wrecking ball. But mainstream archeologists will insist that both the megalithic, precision shaped, air-tight fitted, non-mortar using, kinetically resistant, multi-ton, extremely hard stone material constructs, that demonstrably show they have survived majorly destructive forces, were constructed by the same people (Inca) who made the rough-cut walls that show no signs of undergoing significant damage, during the same time period of around 600 years ago. This is literally devoid of logic, but this is what we are being told to believe.

Jay Anderson

273,941 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten