Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Makes a statement spewing unsubstantiated numbers, finally asks a question. Sec. Mullins immediately points out her numbers are incorrect and she is misinformed. She immediately freaks out "reclaiming my time" WHY bother asking the question if you're not going to let him answer. Oh I get it, you want...

KatTheHammer1's profile picture

Kat™ The Hammer ⚒️

224,214 subscribers

60,646 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Engineers and salespeople think in completely different ways. - Engineers: "If you ask them a question, a hundred percent of them will try and think of what is the correct answer to that question." - Salespeople: "If you're a salesperson, your first thought isn't: what's the answer? It's: why are you asking me that question?" "And so if you have an engineer talking to a good sales guy, it's going to upset them. Because they're often not gonna answer the question." "The guys who are good at the job get rejected, because you don't like them. And then the people who are terrible at it, those are the ones that ended up getting hired." "These CEOs just wanna take a guy who failed the engineering test, put a clean shirt on him and make him the head of sales." benahorowitz.eth with Brian Halligan
1:27

Engineers and salespeople think in completely different ways. - Engineers: "If you ask them a question, a hundred percent of them will try and think of what is the correct answer to that question." - Salespeople: "If you're a salesperson, your first thought isn't: what's the answer? It's: why are you asking me that question?" "And so if you have an engineer talking to a good sales guy, it's going to upset them. Because they're often not gonna answer the question." "The guys who are good at the job get rejected, because you don't like them. And then the people who are terrible at it, those are the ones that ended up getting hired." "These CEOs just wanna take a guy who failed the engineering test, put a clean shirt on him and make him the head of sales." benahorowitz.eth with Brian Halligan

a16z

173,160 views • 4 months ago

WHAT IS THE TRUTH Richard Heart? NOBODY WITH A FOLLOWING HAS THE BALLS TO TAG YOU AND ASK THE EXACT QUESTION THEY WANT TO KNOW............. I DO! I THINK THE BIG QUESTION PEOPLE HAVE, NOT ME, I COULD CARE LESS, BUT OTHERS WANT TO KNOW, THOSE PEOPLE THAT YOU HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH...... ARE THEY BEING BAD ACTORS ON #PULSECHAIN? IF YOU CAN NOT ANSWER WHY OR WHY NOT, I UNDERSTAND WHY........ THEY DON'T. LIKE AND RETWEET IF YOU ARE NOT A COWARD AND WANT THE ANSWER TO THIS ABOUT $PDAI IF YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR QUESTION, FEEL FREE IN THE COMMENTS. EITHER WAY, I'M GOOD
0:22

WHAT IS THE TRUTH Richard Heart? NOBODY WITH A FOLLOWING HAS THE BALLS TO TAG YOU AND ASK THE EXACT QUESTION THEY WANT TO KNOW............. I DO! I THINK THE BIG QUESTION PEOPLE HAVE, NOT ME, I COULD CARE LESS, BUT OTHERS WANT TO KNOW, THOSE PEOPLE THAT YOU HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH...... ARE THEY BEING BAD ACTORS ON #PULSECHAIN? IF YOU CAN NOT ANSWER WHY OR WHY NOT, I UNDERSTAND WHY........ THEY DON'T. LIKE AND RETWEET IF YOU ARE NOT A COWARD AND WANT THE ANSWER TO THIS ABOUT $PDAI IF YOU WANT TO ASK YOUR QUESTION, FEEL FREE IN THE COMMENTS. EITHER WAY, I'M GOOD

MOON KING B-ROOTS

25,807 views • 1 year ago

MADELEINE DEAN: Why did you lie to the New York Post about your relationship with Epstein? LUTNICK: The House Oversight Committee and I agreed-- DEAN: Reclaiming my time. I do not accept that answer. We are our own committee. You're dodging the question. The coverup continues.
2:07

MADELEINE DEAN: Why did you lie to the New York Post about your relationship with Epstein? LUTNICK: The House Oversight Committee and I agreed-- DEAN: Reclaiming my time. I do not accept that answer. We are our own committee. You're dodging the question. The coverup continues.

Aaron Rupar

331,753 views • 3 months ago

"I don't give him a chance at winning this game. If Philip Rivers makes it out upright it's a plus. Them boys are going to get after him and they are going to get him off his spot. They are going to make that 44-year old man move." Kenyon Martin Sr. is out on the Colts on MNF.
5:23

"I don't give him a chance at winning this game. If Philip Rivers makes it out upright it's a plus. Them boys are going to get after him and they are going to get him off his spot. They are going to make that 44-year old man move." Kenyon Martin Sr. is out on the Colts on MNF.

The Arena: Gridiron

51,235 views • 7 months ago

LAWLER: "You're so afraid of Zohran Mamdani!. By the way, when are you endorsing him?" JEFFRIES: "You're a complete and total embarrassment." LAWLER: "Aw. Why is that? Because you don't want to answer the question?"
0:39

LAWLER: "You're so afraid of Zohran Mamdani!. By the way, when are you endorsing him?" JEFFRIES: "You're a complete and total embarrassment." LAWLER: "Aw. Why is that? Because you don't want to answer the question?"

CJ Pearson

804,437 views • 9 months ago

President Trump on Kamala's CNN "interview" tonight: "Why isn't it live? It's an interview that's going to be taped, edited, and then put out. That's not even an interview. And then she's doing it with her Vice President sitting there. So she's not very smart. When they ask her a question she can't answer, she's just going to look at him."
1:04

President Trump on Kamala's CNN "interview" tonight: "Why isn't it live? It's an interview that's going to be taped, edited, and then put out. That's not even an interview. And then she's doing it with her Vice President sitting there. So she's not very smart. When they ask her a question she can't answer, she's just going to look at him."

Trump War Room

1,452,274 views • 1 year ago

Senator Senator Mark Kelly asks Pete Hegseth if he stands by his statement that he would provide no quarter and no mercy to the enemy. Hegseth refuses to answer a simple “yes” or “no” question. Senator Kelly: “I’m going to give you one more chance to address a question here… Your quote was ‘we will keep on pushing, keep advancing, no quarter, no mercy for our enemies,’ and yesterday you did not clarify if you stand by this statement.” Hegseth: [non-answer] Senator Kelly: “You are the Secretary of Defense. The things you say matter and your response here, right now, makes it clear to the American people exactly why you are not right for this job.”
1:38

Senator Senator Mark Kelly asks Pete Hegseth if he stands by his statement that he would provide no quarter and no mercy to the enemy. Hegseth refuses to answer a simple “yes” or “no” question. Senator Kelly: “I’m going to give you one more chance to address a question here… Your quote was ‘we will keep on pushing, keep advancing, no quarter, no mercy for our enemies,’ and yesterday you did not clarify if you stand by this statement.” Hegseth: [non-answer] Senator Kelly: “You are the Secretary of Defense. The things you say matter and your response here, right now, makes it clear to the American people exactly why you are not right for this job.”

Ed Krassenstein

767,146 views • 3 months ago

This woman picks up her son from school and his face was all red, she could tell he’s been crying all afternoon. She managed to get him to sell her what happened. The fact he admitted he did something wrong makes me believe him. Turns out he was being disruptive, making loud noises while the other kids were trying to work and the teacher refused to let him to go specials, instead she put him in the classroom and flicked him off and hit him with a pencil. What I don’t get is he told the office what happened, they didn’t bother to do anything about it, nor did they immediately call her. The teacher in question is still there employed and now he’s scared to go back, if this was your kid would you make him go back, would you feel this was his fault for acting up?
1:13

This woman picks up her son from school and his face was all red, she could tell he’s been crying all afternoon. She managed to get him to sell her what happened. The fact he admitted he did something wrong makes me believe him. Turns out he was being disruptive, making loud noises while the other kids were trying to work and the teacher refused to let him to go specials, instead she put him in the classroom and flicked him off and hit him with a pencil. What I don’t get is he told the office what happened, they didn’t bother to do anything about it, nor did they immediately call her. The teacher in question is still there employed and now he’s scared to go back, if this was your kid would you make him go back, would you feel this was his fault for acting up?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

483,306 views • 5 months ago

❗Dana Bash is noticeably frustrated when Mayor Adams doesn't answer the question the way she wanted regarding the Abrego Garcia deportation. Bash: "I'm not asking if you have to do it. I'm asking if the way the federal government is doing it makes you comfortable or not." Adams: "I want to be consistent. As I said, are you trying to get a yes or no answer to something that I've been consistent on? The federal government must deal with immigration." Apparently, she thought Mayor Adams was going to fall in line with CNN's DNC talking points like a good little soldier. Instead, he makes her look foolish, and it's awesome 👏
2:47

❗Dana Bash is noticeably frustrated when Mayor Adams doesn't answer the question the way she wanted regarding the Abrego Garcia deportation. Bash: "I'm not asking if you have to do it. I'm asking if the way the federal government is doing it makes you comfortable or not." Adams: "I want to be consistent. As I said, are you trying to get a yes or no answer to something that I've been consistent on? The federal government must deal with immigration." Apparently, she thought Mayor Adams was going to fall in line with CNN's DNC talking points like a good little soldier. Instead, he makes her look foolish, and it's awesome 👏

DeVory Darkins

931,348 views • 1 year ago

"What is this? Is this a dunk tank?" Marco Rubio doesn’t hold back after Democrat Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove cuts him off and refuses to let him answer her questions during a House Foreign Affairs hearing: "Why am I here if I don’t get to answer your questions or your defamatory statements?" "You get asked questions for five minutes and you don't get time to answer? It's not a hearing!"
3:06

"What is this? Is this a dunk tank?" Marco Rubio doesn’t hold back after Democrat Rep. Sydney Kamlager-Dove cuts him off and refuses to let him answer her questions during a House Foreign Affairs hearing: "Why am I here if I don’t get to answer your questions or your defamatory statements?" "You get asked questions for five minutes and you don't get time to answer? It's not a hearing!"

Fox News

1,415,643 views • 2 months ago

Aaron Glenn was asked if he prefers to build the team's ecosystem and then put in a young quarterback or vice versa: "I think it depends on, where's your team at right now? You always look at that. Do you have the talent or the skill on the outside, in the backfield to be able to say, 'listen, we're going to get a rookie quarterback and let those guys make plays for him.' Do you have a guy already? And usually if you have a guy, he can make the skill players look better than what they are, too. To me, it always depends on who you have. That's why I want to answer that question, because it's tough to answer just straight on."
1:27

Aaron Glenn was asked if he prefers to build the team's ecosystem and then put in a young quarterback or vice versa: "I think it depends on, where's your team at right now? You always look at that. Do you have the talent or the skill on the outside, in the backfield to be able to say, 'listen, we're going to get a rookie quarterback and let those guys make plays for him.' Do you have a guy already? And usually if you have a guy, he can make the skill players look better than what they are, too. To me, it always depends on who you have. That's why I want to answer that question, because it's tough to answer just straight on."

Jets Videos

261,011 views • 8 months ago

ELON Blocked me for Asking a Question, Then called me Retarded... So last night, Elon Musk blocked me and called me a “retard.” Not because I attacked him. Not because I insulted him. But because I asked him a question. Elon posted data showing that white populations in large cities are declining relative to minority groups, and then declared, “Whites are a dying minority.” I replied with a simple question: “Why is this a problem?” That was it. Within an hour, I was blocked. Elon didn’t answer the question. Instead, he implied I was mentally deficient and retweeted an out-of-context post, conveniently after blocking me so I couldn’t respond. Elon, I remember when you claimed to care about free speech, open debate, and criticism. All I did was ask why this was supposedly a problem. And the fact that that question triggered this reaction tells us everything. None of us are 100% “white.” Race is a social construct, not a biological threat level. Oh and I know a bunch of antisemites will respond telling me I’m “jewish” so I’m not white. Well you are either you bigots.
1:21

ELON Blocked me for Asking a Question, Then called me Retarded... So last night, Elon Musk blocked me and called me a “retard.” Not because I attacked him. Not because I insulted him. But because I asked him a question. Elon posted data showing that white populations in large cities are declining relative to minority groups, and then declared, “Whites are a dying minority.” I replied with a simple question: “Why is this a problem?” That was it. Within an hour, I was blocked. Elon didn’t answer the question. Instead, he implied I was mentally deficient and retweeted an out-of-context post, conveniently after blocking me so I couldn’t respond. Elon, I remember when you claimed to care about free speech, open debate, and criticism. All I did was ask why this was supposedly a problem. And the fact that that question triggered this reaction tells us everything. None of us are 100% “white.” Race is a social construct, not a biological threat level. Oh and I know a bunch of antisemites will respond telling me I’m “jewish” so I’m not white. Well you are either you bigots.

Brian Krassenstein

1,144,449 views • 6 months ago

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.
5:43

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

Simon Ateba

997,322 views • 2 years ago

Jesus said: “I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars. I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.” - Revelation 3:9 (NIV) "You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies."
0:31

Jesus said: “I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars. I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you.” - Revelation 3:9 (NIV) "You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desires. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

Lozzy B 🇦🇺𝕏

83,276 views • 5 months ago

Why did Hitler just get elected? Scott Adams "Some of you are going to wake up and find out that people in your life, let's say young people, who are supporting Kamala Harris, are going to wonder, Why did Hitler just get elected? And you're going to have to answer that question. So rather than answering it yourself, I thought I would do it for you, and then you can just show the video to the young people in your family. How is it that everybody knew he was Hitler. Everybody knew. We all saw it. We saw him trying to steal democracy with our own eyes and stuff. So, so how can he possibly get elected? I give you the answer to that" 1.5x speed
6:00

Why did Hitler just get elected? Scott Adams "Some of you are going to wake up and find out that people in your life, let's say young people, who are supporting Kamala Harris, are going to wonder, Why did Hitler just get elected? And you're going to have to answer that question. So rather than answering it yourself, I thought I would do it for you, and then you can just show the video to the young people in your family. How is it that everybody knew he was Hitler. Everybody knew. We all saw it. We saw him trying to steal democracy with our own eyes and stuff. So, so how can he possibly get elected? I give you the answer to that" 1.5x speed

jay plemons

227,827 views • 1 year ago

⚡ RAW VIDEO: “Answer as a Man” — Kelly Confronts Mayor Johnson ⚡ At today’s presser, I asked Mayor Johnson what real Chicagoans are asking: how can you call law enforcement “a sickness” while you hide behind 150 sworn CPD officers? And if you and your wife Stacey were ever attacked — shot at, rammed by a protester vehicle — would you order your police detail to stand down? He really didn't like that question. Then I asked him a question that infuriated him and his staff and they tried to shut me down: Last month, a Nicaraguan illegal alien bashed a Chicago woman’s head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. So I asked Mayor Johnson: if that victim had been your wife Stacey, would you want ICE to deport that rapist? Yes or no? His answer? He wouldn’t say yes. So I said it for him: “No? OK, that’s the answer. That’s the answer for real Chicagoans.” That's not an answer a real man or a real mayor would give - that's the opinion of this reporter.
3:43

⚡ RAW VIDEO: “Answer as a Man” — Kelly Confronts Mayor Johnson ⚡ At today’s presser, I asked Mayor Johnson what real Chicagoans are asking: how can you call law enforcement “a sickness” while you hide behind 150 sworn CPD officers? And if you and your wife Stacey were ever attacked — shot at, rammed by a protester vehicle — would you order your police detail to stand down? He really didn't like that question. Then I asked him a question that infuriated him and his staff and they tried to shut me down: Last month, a Nicaraguan illegal alien bashed a Chicago woman’s head into the sidewalk, knocked her unconscious, and raped her. So I asked Mayor Johnson: if that victim had been your wife Stacey, would you want ICE to deport that rapist? Yes or no? His answer? He wouldn’t say yes. So I said it for him: “No? OK, that’s the answer. That’s the answer for real Chicagoans.” That's not an answer a real man or a real mayor would give - that's the opinion of this reporter.

Reporter William J. Kelly #thatreporter

997,463 views • 9 months ago

Yet ANOTHER reporter has just tried to get Trump to reveal his strategy against Iran, which he CALLED OUT immediately for the stupid question it was. President Trump: "Let me ask you this: If you were in my position and I asked you that question, do you really believe I would give you that answer?" "That's a CRAZY question. It's strategy." They would leak it to our opposition just because they have TDS.
0:27

Yet ANOTHER reporter has just tried to get Trump to reveal his strategy against Iran, which he CALLED OUT immediately for the stupid question it was. President Trump: "Let me ask you this: If you were in my position and I asked you that question, do you really believe I would give you that answer?" "That's a CRAZY question. It's strategy." They would leak it to our opposition just because they have TDS.

Gunther Eagleman™

32,755 views • 4 months ago

Sean Penn admits that he refused to let his daughter leave the house until he was allowed to verbally assault her date at the front door "that was 16 years of waiting, this was not her night, this was my night" "I had to explain to her before I would answer the door that she was not ready" "I told her 'I will not let you go out with him if I don't get this moment'" The interrogation: "that's your car? Nice. You're not gonna drive drunk with my daughter are you?" "I'd prefer you get her back early. But I want you guys to have a good time" "whatever you do with her while you're out, I'm gonna do with you when you get her home"
1:09

Sean Penn admits that he refused to let his daughter leave the house until he was allowed to verbally assault her date at the front door "that was 16 years of waiting, this was not her night, this was my night" "I had to explain to her before I would answer the door that she was not ready" "I told her 'I will not let you go out with him if I don't get this moment'" The interrogation: "that's your car? Nice. You're not gonna drive drunk with my daughter are you?" "I'd prefer you get her back early. But I want you guys to have a good time" "whatever you do with her while you're out, I'm gonna do with you when you get her home"

Rixlerr

710,733 views • 10 days ago

If you're drowning in bureaucracy at work, your company probably isn't following Elon Musk's five-step process for improvement. Here are the highlights: "Everybody's been trained in high school and college that you have to answer the question. It's convergence logic. You can't tell a professor '"your question is dumb" or you'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So without knowing it, people have mental straight jackets on. They will work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist." "It's particularly dangerous if the smart person gave you the requirements because you might not question them enough." "If you're not occasionally adding things back in, you're not deleting enough process. The bias tends to be very strongly towards adding things." (These quotes are paraphrased to make them easier to read).
1:29

If you're drowning in bureaucracy at work, your company probably isn't following Elon Musk's five-step process for improvement. Here are the highlights: "Everybody's been trained in high school and college that you have to answer the question. It's convergence logic. You can't tell a professor '"your question is dumb" or you'll get a bad grade. You have to answer the question. So without knowing it, people have mental straight jackets on. They will work on optimizing the thing that should simply not exist." "It's particularly dangerous if the smart person gave you the requirements because you might not question them enough." "If you're not occasionally adding things back in, you're not deleting enough process. The bias tends to be very strongly towards adding things." (These quotes are paraphrased to make them easier to read).

David Perell

377,382 views • 3 years ago

This is excruciating to watch! Camilla Tominey brilliantly turns the screw on Labour MP James Murray. She asks him ONE simple question: are you borrowing and spending more in this parliament? Watch until the end. He REFUSES to give a straight answer. I absolutely hate this.
3:43

This is excruciating to watch! Camilla Tominey brilliantly turns the screw on Labour MP James Murray. She asks him ONE simple question: are you borrowing and spending more in this parliament? Watch until the end. He REFUSES to give a straight answer. I absolutely hate this.

Lee Harris

140,863 views • 1 year ago