Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Man tells the internet he intends to continue using women’s single-sex spaces despite knowing service providers can lawfully exclude him. Man says his feelings are hurt because some people called him a “predator” for saying this. Man claims he has been threatened with sexual assault. Man cries and says...

jan_murray's profile picture

Janet Murray

40,375 subscribers

32,356 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

EducationHealth & WellnessNews & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

This gentleman says he will continue to use women’s single-sex spaces in public settings. Despite knowing it is lawful and legitimate for service providers to exclude him. Why? Because he believes he is entitled to be there. And because he thinks minimum-wage staff will eventually get tired of challenging men like him and simply look the other way. Women know this pattern. Some men don’t accept “no”. They keep pushing boundaries, believing that if they persist for long enough, women will eventually give in. They know how difficult it can be for women to be taken seriously. They know how uncomfortable it is to keep objecting. And they rely on eventually wearing women down. Women warned this would happen. If men were told that calling themselves women gave them access to female spaces, some would push those boundaries as far as they could. This video - and I’ve seen many like it - shows some are still trying to wear women down. Even after the law clarified that service providers can lawfully exclude men from women’s single-sex spaces, they are openly saying they’ll ignore those boundaries. But respecting women’s boundaries shouldn’t be optional.
1:39

This gentleman says he will continue to use women’s single-sex spaces in public settings. Despite knowing it is lawful and legitimate for service providers to exclude him. Why? Because he believes he is entitled to be there. And because he thinks minimum-wage staff will eventually get tired of challenging men like him and simply look the other way. Women know this pattern. Some men don’t accept “no”. They keep pushing boundaries, believing that if they persist for long enough, women will eventually give in. They know how difficult it can be for women to be taken seriously. They know how uncomfortable it is to keep objecting. And they rely on eventually wearing women down. Women warned this would happen. If men were told that calling themselves women gave them access to female spaces, some would push those boundaries as far as they could. This video - and I’ve seen many like it - shows some are still trying to wear women down. Even after the law clarified that service providers can lawfully exclude men from women’s single-sex spaces, they are openly saying they’ll ignore those boundaries. But respecting women’s boundaries shouldn’t be optional.

Janet Murray

272,621 views • 1 month ago

The state of this unit of a man who demands access to women’s spaces because he claims to be scared of other men while telling women to ‘get over it’ #Wanker
3:04

Sensitive content

The state of this unit of a man who demands access to women’s spaces because he claims to be scared of other men while telling women to ‘get over it’ #Wanker

Le_Sorelle_Arduino KPSS

167,085 views • 8 months ago

“I’ve been kicked out of Planet Fitness & Crunch” says the man in the women’s change room at Gold’s Gym, evidentially fully aware that women don’t want him there but he couldn’t give less of AF. Men who demand access to women’s spaces are the reason women’s spaces are necessary.
1:23

Sensitive content

“I’ve been kicked out of Planet Fitness & Crunch” says the man in the women’s change room at Gold’s Gym, evidentially fully aware that women don’t want him there but he couldn’t give less of AF. Men who demand access to women’s spaces are the reason women’s spaces are necessary.

Sall Grover

955,225 views • 10 months ago

This man says he only feels safe and comfortable in the women’s bathroom. Democrats want him to use the women’s bathrooms simply because he claims to identify as a woman.
2:17

This man says he only feels safe and comfortable in the women’s bathroom. Democrats want him to use the women’s bathrooms simply because he claims to identify as a woman.

Libs of TikTok

3,424,792 views • 1 year ago

A man is complaining that Wetherspoons told him he couldn’t use the women’s toilets after two women informed staff they were uncomfortable with him being in there. Apparently, women are expected to be perfectly comfortable with a man being in, and taking photos in, the ladies’ toilets. Not a word about the women who no longer felt safe or comfortable because he was there. Plenty, though, about his own “safety” and “comfort” if he had to use the men’s. Well done, Wetherspoons.
0:56

A man is complaining that Wetherspoons told him he couldn’t use the women’s toilets after two women informed staff they were uncomfortable with him being in there. Apparently, women are expected to be perfectly comfortable with a man being in, and taking photos in, the ladies’ toilets. Not a word about the women who no longer felt safe or comfortable because he was there. Plenty, though, about his own “safety” and “comfort” if he had to use the men’s. Well done, Wetherspoons.

Nora Calder

314,445 views • 2 months ago

This cross dressing man is a school teacher in the UK When The Supreme Court ruling was made he did a class with his A-Level students where he drew parallels with him not being able to use women’s spaces to racial segregation in the states These men are disgusting
1:54

This cross dressing man is a school teacher in the UK When The Supreme Court ruling was made he did a class with his A-Level students where he drew parallels with him not being able to use women’s spaces to racial segregation in the states These men are disgusting

Le_Sorelle_Arduino KPSS

48,072 views • 2 months ago

A man punching a woman in the face because she called him a man is not “progress.” It is violence. No ideology, identity, or political belief should ever require women to ignore biological reality at the expense of our safety. Men are, on average, physically stronger than women. That matters in sports. It matters in locker rooms. And it absolutely matters when violence happens. Women should not have to surrender fairness, privacy, or safety to validate anyone else’s identity. This is exactly why we need clear boundaries around women’s sports and intimate spaces. Protect women. Protect girls. Safety is not hate. ❤️ #ProtectWomen #WomensSafety #FairPlay #SaveWomensSports #WomenAndGirls
0:49

A man punching a woman in the face because she called him a man is not “progress.” It is violence. No ideology, identity, or political belief should ever require women to ignore biological reality at the expense of our safety. Men are, on average, physically stronger than women. That matters in sports. It matters in locker rooms. And it absolutely matters when violence happens. Women should not have to surrender fairness, privacy, or safety to validate anyone else’s identity. This is exactly why we need clear boundaries around women’s sports and intimate spaces. Protect women. Protect girls. Safety is not hate. ❤️ #ProtectWomen #WomensSafety #FairPlay #SaveWomensSports #WomenAndGirls

Tish Hyman

123,590 views • 20 days ago

A cross dresser tries to tell women that they have power over men. Understanding how much men want a woman for her body because he “used to be man”…. And these are the people you are advocating for to have access to women’s spaces.
1:49

A cross dresser tries to tell women that they have power over men. Understanding how much men want a woman for her body because he “used to be man”…. And these are the people you are advocating for to have access to women’s spaces.

AJ

397,074 views • 1 year ago

A man who claims to be a woman attempted to explain what women think about men who claim to be women. He completely failed. *ahem* • “They reject the distinction between gender identity and sex and that these two things can be in conflict” No. We know that gender identity & sex are very different. In fact that is basically our entire argument. Gender identity = a manmade concept. Sex = Naturally observable over the entire natural world, including humans. Binary & immutable. • “They are concerned with the safety & integrity of spaces that are typically reserved for women” No. Not “typically”. *Are*. ARE reserved for women. “Typically” is an admission that you know the group trying to gain access to the women’s spaces aren’t women. Which is our entire point to begin with, sir. They’re men. • “Trans people are concerned with safety & privacy in private spaces.” Great. Then leave women’s spaces alone, respecting the women who want them, and focus on creating your own spaces catering to your “man claiming to be woman” needs, whatever they may be. We won’t stop you. • “Trans people are seeking to go about their business & mind their business” Cool story, but the problem is the process of that appears to be changing the definition of “woman” in law & gaining access to women’s spaces, services & sport. So we fight back because we are not willing to give up our rights & needs so men in dresses can “go about their business”. • “We have had inclusive policies… and there was not a spate of people pretending to be trans, going into spaces & abusing anyone.” Either a) you’re ignoring all of the cases of men invading women’s spaces & sexually assaulting women - we can name 10 examples just in prisons off the top of our head - because it doesn’t suit your argument; b) you’re completely aware & just lying; c) you argument is they weren’t “trans” which means they must have been making it up; d) even if there were no cases, it still doesn’t make men women! • “Discomfort alone is not grounds to exclude people.” No, it isn’t. Sex is. Men are excluded from women’s spaces on the basis of sex. We exclude all men, including men with a gender identity and men we are comfortable with. It’s frankly unforgivable to speak this untruthfully about this issue in 2026, and it’s utterly shameful that two men just nodded along to blatantly obvious untruths. This is the intellectual equivalent of junk food.
1:20

A man who claims to be a woman attempted to explain what women think about men who claim to be women. He completely failed. *ahem* • “They reject the distinction between gender identity and sex and that these two things can be in conflict” No. We know that gender identity & sex are very different. In fact that is basically our entire argument. Gender identity = a manmade concept. Sex = Naturally observable over the entire natural world, including humans. Binary & immutable. • “They are concerned with the safety & integrity of spaces that are typically reserved for women” No. Not “typically”. *Are*. ARE reserved for women. “Typically” is an admission that you know the group trying to gain access to the women’s spaces aren’t women. Which is our entire point to begin with, sir. They’re men. • “Trans people are concerned with safety & privacy in private spaces.” Great. Then leave women’s spaces alone, respecting the women who want them, and focus on creating your own spaces catering to your “man claiming to be woman” needs, whatever they may be. We won’t stop you. • “Trans people are seeking to go about their business & mind their business” Cool story, but the problem is the process of that appears to be changing the definition of “woman” in law & gaining access to women’s spaces, services & sport. So we fight back because we are not willing to give up our rights & needs so men in dresses can “go about their business”. • “We have had inclusive policies… and there was not a spate of people pretending to be trans, going into spaces & abusing anyone.” Either a) you’re ignoring all of the cases of men invading women’s spaces & sexually assaulting women - we can name 10 examples just in prisons off the top of our head - because it doesn’t suit your argument; b) you’re completely aware & just lying; c) you argument is they weren’t “trans” which means they must have been making it up; d) even if there were no cases, it still doesn’t make men women! • “Discomfort alone is not grounds to exclude people.” No, it isn’t. Sex is. Men are excluded from women’s spaces on the basis of sex. We exclude all men, including men with a gender identity and men we are comfortable with. It’s frankly unforgivable to speak this untruthfully about this issue in 2026, and it’s utterly shameful that two men just nodded along to blatantly obvious untruths. This is the intellectual equivalent of junk food.

Sall Grover

122,589 views • 5 months ago

There is proof and a video of Tshepang Nyathi throwing the 53 year old man with water, but now his friends are lying and covering up by saying he didn't throw any water at this man he was just walking and the man called him just to stab him to death
10:12

There is proof and a video of Tshepang Nyathi throwing the 53 year old man with water, but now his friends are lying and covering up by saying he didn't throw any water at this man he was just walking and the man called him just to stab him to death

IG:Joy-Zelda

69,632 views • 12 days ago

‼️A grown man was in the Victoria Secrets dressing room yesterday while I was being fitted and trying to ask questions. Women’s spaces are being invaded by men! 20 years ago if a man had of entered a women’s dressing room he would have either went to jail, been trespassed or caught a few fists. These days when a man enters a woman’s dressing room it’s considered normal— He clearly just needs to try on bras to cover his fake 🍈🍈s. 🙄 How many stores and schools would likely ban men from women’s dressing rooms, locker rooms and bathrooms if it weren’t unlawful for them to do so? Why are private businesses and public schools being forced to allow men to invade women’s spaces? The idea to allow men in women’s spaces is wildly unpopular. I’m ready to see women’s spaces protected again once and for all. #xxxy
2:59

‼️A grown man was in the Victoria Secrets dressing room yesterday while I was being fitted and trying to ask questions. Women’s spaces are being invaded by men! 20 years ago if a man had of entered a women’s dressing room he would have either went to jail, been trespassed or caught a few fists. These days when a man enters a woman’s dressing room it’s considered normal— He clearly just needs to try on bras to cover his fake 🍈🍈s. 🙄 How many stores and schools would likely ban men from women’s dressing rooms, locker rooms and bathrooms if it weren’t unlawful for them to do so? Why are private businesses and public schools being forced to allow men to invade women’s spaces? The idea to allow men in women’s spaces is wildly unpopular. I’m ready to see women’s spaces protected again once and for all. #xxxy

Conspiracookie

14,651 views • 1 month ago

“I am happy that women are beginning to open their eyes in this generation. If a woman decides not to get married and have kids, she has nothing to lose, but if a man decides to do the same, he is losing.” - Man says
2:59

Sensitive content

“I am happy that women are beginning to open their eyes in this generation. If a woman decides not to get married and have kids, she has nothing to lose, but if a man decides to do the same, he is losing.” - Man says

The Benin Blogger

48,598 views • 2 months ago

A man suggests that he should be allowed to violate women's spaces because he is unsafe being around other men. These men need to realize that it is not a woman's job to protect men who choose to pretend to be women. He is also completely failing to recognize that he is suggesting his safety as a man is more important that women's safety from men pretending to be women. What he completely fails to understand, is he and any man can opt out of being victimized if they stop pretending to be women, something women can never do! It is so clear gender ideology is grounded in misogyny.
2:33

A man suggests that he should be allowed to violate women's spaces because he is unsafe being around other men. These men need to realize that it is not a woman's job to protect men who choose to pretend to be women. He is also completely failing to recognize that he is suggesting his safety as a man is more important that women's safety from men pretending to be women. What he completely fails to understand, is he and any man can opt out of being victimized if they stop pretending to be women, something women can never do! It is so clear gender ideology is grounded in misogyny.

moving on

772,727 views • 1 year ago

Man says Rep. Nancy Mace hates Rep.-elect Sarah McBride, who’s a man pretending to be a woman, because McBride is Mace’s equal. Mace actually just doesn’t want men in women’s bathrooms. She couldn’t care less about McBride, other than the fact he invades women’s private spaces.
1:45

Man says Rep. Nancy Mace hates Rep.-elect Sarah McBride, who’s a man pretending to be a woman, because McBride is Mace’s equal. Mace actually just doesn’t want men in women’s bathrooms. She couldn’t care less about McBride, other than the fact he invades women’s private spaces.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

134,652 views • 1 year ago

🚨#BREAKING: Tyjuan Crenshaw, a man who works with special needs children, saw a young man being BEATEN IN THE STREET. He stepped in and saved the man and chased the attacker off... ...AND THE POLICE ARRESTED HIM FOR IT He was charged with assault. Tyjuan is a MANDATORY REPORTER because he works with special needs kids. He is LEGALLY REQUIRED to step in when he sees a vulnerable person being abused. Crenshaw says he saw a man beating a vulnerable young man on Baylor's Lane in Petersburg, Virginia. In his words: "He was beating the hell out of him. After he dropped, he hit him across his head five more times." So Crenshaw stepped in. He says the man told him to mind his own business... then went and got a dog to sic on him. He stood his ground and protected the man until the police got there. When the police showed up, they arrested CRENSHAW. Charged him with assault and listed the man he was trying to stop as the VICTIM!!! But here's the kicker. TWO DAYS LATER, police arrested that same man, Harold Parker, and charged him with ABUSE AND NEGLECT OF AN INCAPACITATED ADULT. The exact thing Crenshaw said he was trying to stop! So the man who stepped in to protect the vulnerable is facing charges. When asked if he would do anything different, Crenshaw said: "If I had to do it all over, I'd do it again!"
1:17

🚨#BREAKING: Tyjuan Crenshaw, a man who works with special needs children, saw a young man being BEATEN IN THE STREET. He stepped in and saved the man and chased the attacker off... ...AND THE POLICE ARRESTED HIM FOR IT He was charged with assault. Tyjuan is a MANDATORY REPORTER because he works with special needs kids. He is LEGALLY REQUIRED to step in when he sees a vulnerable person being abused. Crenshaw says he saw a man beating a vulnerable young man on Baylor's Lane in Petersburg, Virginia. In his words: "He was beating the hell out of him. After he dropped, he hit him across his head five more times." So Crenshaw stepped in. He says the man told him to mind his own business... then went and got a dog to sic on him. He stood his ground and protected the man until the police got there. When the police showed up, they arrested CRENSHAW. Charged him with assault and listed the man he was trying to stop as the VICTIM!!! But here's the kicker. TWO DAYS LATER, police arrested that same man, Harold Parker, and charged him with ABUSE AND NEGLECT OF AN INCAPACITATED ADULT. The exact thing Crenshaw said he was trying to stop! So the man who stepped in to protect the vulnerable is facing charges. When asked if he would do anything different, Crenshaw said: "If I had to do it all over, I'd do it again!"

Matt Van Swol

116,863 views • 2 months ago

“I will smack the shit out of you I promise” Those were the words of a man who thought he and his friend had the right to be in the women’s toilets when my friends and I confronted them. Women are not people who wear make up or dresses, they are adult human females and they deserve single sex spaces. Not sure why he thought making a physical threat would convince us otherwise.
2:50

“I will smack the shit out of you I promise” Those were the words of a man who thought he and his friend had the right to be in the women’s toilets when my friends and I confronted them. Women are not people who wear make up or dresses, they are adult human females and they deserve single sex spaces. Not sure why he thought making a physical threat would convince us otherwise.

Octavia Evans

1,032,227 views • 8 months ago