Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Manufacturing is 𝘦𝘢𝘴𝘺. Only if 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘥𝘰𝘯’𝘵 𝘬𝘯𝘰𝘸 what happens behind the scenes. Every mixer we build has over 100 parts. For each, we need two vendors. That’s 200 vendors to manage. Not only this: - Keeping stock - Ensuring quality, and - Maintaining a steady flow 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗱𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘆.... 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝗳𝗮𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁. 𝗢𝗻𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝗶𝘀𝘀𝘂𝗲. 𝗔𝗻𝗱 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗽𝘀. Manufacturing isn’t just about building. It’s about 𝗸𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻 𝘀𝗺𝗼𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗹𝘆 𝗿𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴. 𝗘𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗬. 𝗦𝗜𝗡𝗚𝗟𝗘. 𝗗𝗔𝗬. How do you handle supply chain challenges in your industry?show more

Prakash Dadlani

38,646 subscribers

21,746 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

Finance Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Comments

Samavedha (ಸಾಮಾವೇಧ )1 year ago

We supply 132 parts @ 900/ day ( Sheet metal) to Tier 2 ,from 2022 zero delivery failure and less than 3 ppm ,this being achieved through 5 day stock inventory and good production system

Prakash Dadlani1 year ago

This is SUPER LEAN supply chain management. Keep it going! 💪

opensourceCM1 year ago

What’s the cost of mistakes in your contracts? If you work with contracts day-to-day, it’s time to automate. Track every detail, streamline workflows ... ✨ Make managing contracts as easy as a few clicks. Visit our new website & book your demo today!

Ashish Goyani1 year ago

Defferent part have different size and colours in stock

Prakash Dadlani1 year ago

Yes exactly if we count in that way the variations would be in the 1000's.

Sukh Dugal1 year ago

Have to write custom software on top of the ERP to ensure RM is rotated efficiently. We have 40+ active suppliers and have to rely on relationships on the field for quality and time. Such a hard problem.

CholeChawal1 year ago

Keep going and is this possible can i order single pcs for use

Prakash Dadlani1 year ago

Soon will launch our own model for domestic market.

amitsarda.xyz1 year ago

i loved reading The Goal for this reason.. i still feel it falls short when it comes to real life experiences.. but still is the best resource (crash course)

❤‍🔥D-CULT Pravin Gowda666(Jai Sanatan🚩🚩🚩)1 year ago

It's such a great job sir ji 😍hats off for your work n responsibility towards quality maintenance

Morningstar (that's the literal meaning)1 year ago

🥹🙆 man your phone must be at constant connection. 💯🍀 Go bigger.

Related Videos

Suozzi: When something crazy is being proposed—something outlandish—we need to fight and resist. But when something addresses the concerns of the American people, we need to find common ground and get things done. This isn’t just about the election in 2026 or the election in 2028. It’s about right now. It’s about making people’s lives better now. A lot of people will say, “Well, the Republicans didn’t do that. They didn’t help Biden get things done. They didn’t work across party lines when they controlled the House.” And that’s true. It was the least productive Congress in modern history… But just because that’s what they did doesn’t mean that’s what we should do. It’s not just about winning. It’s about trying to move the country forward, solve problems, and make people’s lives better. This business isn’t worth it for the ego or just for the competition—“I’m right, you’re wrong; I win, you lose.” It’s only worth it if we’re actually making the world a better place to live in. We need to call out the Republicans when they do crazy stuff, when they’re extreme. But we also need to work with them when we can find ways forward to make our country a better place to live in.

Suozzi: When something crazy is being proposed—something outlandish—we need to fight and resist. But when something addresses the concerns of the American people, we need to find common ground and get things done. This isn’t just about the election in 2026 or the election in 2028. It’s about right now. It’s about making people’s lives better now. A lot of people will say, “Well, the Republicans didn’t do that. They didn’t help Biden get things done. They didn’t work across party lines when they controlled the House.” And that’s true. It was the least productive Congress in modern history… But just because that’s what they did doesn’t mean that’s what we should do. It’s not just about winning. It’s about trying to move the country forward, solve problems, and make people’s lives better. This business isn’t worth it for the ego or just for the competition—“I’m right, you’re wrong; I win, you lose.” It’s only worth it if we’re actually making the world a better place to live in. We need to call out the Republicans when they do crazy stuff, when they’re extreme. But we also need to work with them when we can find ways forward to make our country a better place to live in.

Acyn

47,870 views • 1 year ago

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang explains how the emergence of AI is going to re-industrialize the United States: “The United States has been declining in manufacturing for some time, and the computer industry was largely outsourced and it became really an intellectual property job, information processing job. And over the course of the last 50 years our economy and our communities have really changed in shape. And we really need to figure out a way to bring back manufacturing. However, how do you fundamentally bring back manufacturing for industries that have existed forever? CEOs are strategists, and when we think about how do you enter into a new market, how do you drive prosperity, how do you drive growth, you can't go and compete with somebody doing something that they've been doing for 50 or 100 years. And so we need to, we need to look for a phase shift, a new industry that happens, where all of a sudden, a whole bunch of new skills, a whole bunch of new factories, a whole bunch of new companies that didn't exist before can now exist. And this is the perfect time for United States. We are going to re-industrialize United States in precisely the type of plants that were either unnecessary or not enough in the past.”

NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang explains how the emergence of AI is going to re-industrialize the United States: “The United States has been declining in manufacturing for some time, and the computer industry was largely outsourced and it became really an intellectual property job, information processing job. And over the course of the last 50 years our economy and our communities have really changed in shape. And we really need to figure out a way to bring back manufacturing. However, how do you fundamentally bring back manufacturing for industries that have existed forever? CEOs are strategists, and when we think about how do you enter into a new market, how do you drive prosperity, how do you drive growth, you can't go and compete with somebody doing something that they've been doing for 50 or 100 years. And so we need to, we need to look for a phase shift, a new industry that happens, where all of a sudden, a whole bunch of new skills, a whole bunch of new factories, a whole bunch of new companies that didn't exist before can now exist. And this is the perfect time for United States. We are going to re-industrialize United States in precisely the type of plants that were either unnecessary or not enough in the past.”

Ryan Saavedra

26,780 views • 2 months ago

Robinhood’s Head of Crypto explains why they’re building an Ethereum L2 “You see a lot of companies right now building their own L1. We were excited about this idea of controlling everything you want to build, but creating the security of a real, proper, decentralized chain is extremely difficult, and you basically get that for free with Ethereum.” “When you look at some of these new L1s that are being created: it’s not really decentralized and it’s not really secure — at the end of the day it’s basically a fancy database that’s a bit slower to use than an actual database, so we didn’t really see the value in that. With Ethereum we get the security by default.” “The second thing that we get by building an L2 is all of the liquidity that is already on every EVM-compatible chains. That was also a very important decision factor for us. If we really want to bring the stock market on-chain, we need to have this liquidity. It’s not going to be possible if it’s in a closed loop or a closed chain that nobody can access.” “For us, those were the two elements that we really wanted to focus on, and that’s why we decided to build on Ethereum.” Source: DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth (Dec 2025)

Robinhood’s Head of Crypto explains why they’re building an Ethereum L2 “You see a lot of companies right now building their own L1. We were excited about this idea of controlling everything you want to build, but creating the security of a real, proper, decentralized chain is extremely difficult, and you basically get that for free with Ethereum.” “When you look at some of these new L1s that are being created: it’s not really decentralized and it’s not really secure — at the end of the day it’s basically a fancy database that’s a bit slower to use than an actual database, so we didn’t really see the value in that. With Ethereum we get the security by default.” “The second thing that we get by building an L2 is all of the liquidity that is already on every EVM-compatible chains. That was also a very important decision factor for us. If we really want to bring the stock market on-chain, we need to have this liquidity. It’s not going to be possible if it’s in a closed loop or a closed chain that nobody can access.” “For us, those were the two elements that we really wanted to focus on, and that’s why we decided to build on Ethereum.” Source: DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth (Dec 2025)

Etherealize

26,381 views • 5 months ago

260527 wendy youngstreet sbs radio #LEO #SANGWON 🐉 (read a comment) sangrioz, sangwon and leo. last time on youngstreet’s show, you said you felt sad because you two talked less privately. i’m curious if you’ve been talking more since then? 🦁 yeah, we talk a lot now. recently, for example, when we buy clothes or when there’s something, we’ll go like, “ah, what do you think about this?” “hmm this one?” “ah that’s a bit too much.” stuff related to clothes mostly 🦁 whether it’s clothes or anything else, we show each other items from our wishlists and kinda give evaluations… not really evaluations, but yeah. these days i think we talk a lot about clothes 💬 so besides clothes, you don’t really talk about anything else? 🥀 no, we talk about lots of things. we really do. it’s just that the only thing i can think of right now is clothes 💬 so the clothes topic just left the strongest impression 🦁 it’s because that’s our shared interest 💬 so conversations flow the best when it’s about your common interests? 🦁 exactly 💬 and that common interest happens to be clothes 🥀 these days it’s clothes

260527 wendy youngstreet sbs radio #LEO #SANGWON 🐉 (read a comment) sangrioz, sangwon and leo. last time on youngstreet’s show, you said you felt sad because you two talked less privately. i’m curious if you’ve been talking more since then? 🦁 yeah, we talk a lot now. recently, for example, when we buy clothes or when there’s something, we’ll go like, “ah, what do you think about this?” “hmm this one?” “ah that’s a bit too much.” stuff related to clothes mostly 🦁 whether it’s clothes or anything else, we show each other items from our wishlists and kinda give evaluations… not really evaluations, but yeah. these days i think we talk a lot about clothes 💬 so besides clothes, you don’t really talk about anything else? 🥀 no, we talk about lots of things. we really do. it’s just that the only thing i can think of right now is clothes 💬 so the clothes topic just left the strongest impression 🦁 it’s because that’s our shared interest 💬 so conversations flow the best when it’s about your common interests? 🦁 exactly 💬 and that common interest happens to be clothes 🥀 these days it’s clothes

moni 𐙚 // ia.

86,574 views • 3 months ago

Senator John Kennedy just went toe-to-toe with CBS’ Margaret Brennan after she claimed the SAVE America Act would “hurt faith” in America’s elections. Kennedy argued the legislation would do the EXACT opposite. BRENNAN: “The SAVE Act, as you know, or even some version of it, is highly partisan, highly controversial.” “Bigger picture, isn’t it going to hurt faith in our election process if a Republican-only policy to change how elections are run is rammed through 100 days…less than 100 days out from the election?” KENNEDY: “No.” “In my opinion, for both sides to have credibility in our elections, we need to do two things and only two things.” “Number one, you have to prove you are who you say you are in order to register to vote and to vote.” “And number two, however you decide to vote, that’s up to the states. We need to go back to having an election day, not an election month.” “We’ve got to know the results of elections that night or shortly thereafter, if it’s close.” “That, to me, is what the SAVE Act is all about.” “And I think we can pass it. And I think we can craft it in a way to survive a birdbath, but we’re not going to know if we don’t try!” BRENNAN: “Grants, in other words, to states to incentivize. Not requirements for states to action…that’s your version.” KENNEDY: “That’s not the only thing.” “I’ve been contacted by some really smart people about a way to do it in addition to the grants. I’m not saying it will work. But you’re not going to know unless you try.”

Senator John Kennedy just went toe-to-toe with CBS’ Margaret Brennan after she claimed the SAVE America Act would “hurt faith” in America’s elections. Kennedy argued the legislation would do the EXACT opposite. BRENNAN: “The SAVE Act, as you know, or even some version of it, is highly partisan, highly controversial.” “Bigger picture, isn’t it going to hurt faith in our election process if a Republican-only policy to change how elections are run is rammed through 100 days…less than 100 days out from the election?” KENNEDY: “No.” “In my opinion, for both sides to have credibility in our elections, we need to do two things and only two things.” “Number one, you have to prove you are who you say you are in order to register to vote and to vote.” “And number two, however you decide to vote, that’s up to the states. We need to go back to having an election day, not an election month.” “We’ve got to know the results of elections that night or shortly thereafter, if it’s close.” “That, to me, is what the SAVE Act is all about.” “And I think we can pass it. And I think we can craft it in a way to survive a birdbath, but we’re not going to know if we don’t try!” BRENNAN: “Grants, in other words, to states to incentivize. Not requirements for states to action…that’s your version.” KENNEDY: “That’s not the only thing.” “I’ve been contacted by some really smart people about a way to do it in addition to the grants. I’m not saying it will work. But you’re not going to know unless you try.”

Overton

153,371 views • 1 month ago

Never-ending to-do list? You’re not alone. Here’s the truth: It’s not about how much you have to do, it’s about how you design your days. Because life isn’t meant to be managed. It’s meant to be designed. For 48 years, this simple but powerful system has helped people create not just success, but a life filled with meaning and time for what matters most. If you want more clarity, more follow-through, and ultimately, more fulfillment, this is for you. Join me LIVE from July 29–31 for RPM: Master Your Time & Design Your Life—the only time I’m teaching this transformational system this year. In 3 days, you’ll learn how to take back control of your time, build a life by your design, and finally align your actions with what matters most to you. Reserve your spot now: More time. Less stress.

Never-ending to-do list? You’re not alone. Here’s the truth: It’s not about how much you have to do, it’s about how you design your days. Because life isn’t meant to be managed. It’s meant to be designed. For 48 years, this simple but powerful system has helped people create not just success, but a life filled with meaning and time for what matters most. If you want more clarity, more follow-through, and ultimately, more fulfillment, this is for you. Join me LIVE from July 29–31 for RPM: Master Your Time & Design Your Life—the only time I’m teaching this transformational system this year. In 3 days, you’ll learn how to take back control of your time, build a life by your design, and finally align your actions with what matters most to you. Reserve your spot now: More time. Less stress.

Tony Robbins

35,415 views • 1 year ago

Everyone is up-in-arms over the Matt Rife comedy special. Every time a comedian comes under fire, this is what I wish I could scream from the rooftops: You’re allowed to speak about what you find to be “inappropriate” comedy, but just understand that—in this instance—you almost always sound annoying to everyone else in the room. You sound like every other person who’s ever complained about how we “shouldn’t joke about that.” In this instance, there’s nothing special, moving, or compelling about your voice. If a joke fails with an audience, a joke fails. If it fails repeatedly, it’s probably either not funny or not delivered well. If it’s not funny, it shouldn’t be told. But at a COMEDY show, that’s literally the only reason to censor yourself—because what you were gonna say was overwhelming not funny—not because it “wasn’t appropriate.” If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen, snowflakes. *and no, this isn’t me saying I thought the joke—or the special (which I haven’t seen)—was funny.

Everyone is up-in-arms over the Matt Rife comedy special. Every time a comedian comes under fire, this is what I wish I could scream from the rooftops: You’re allowed to speak about what you find to be “inappropriate” comedy, but just understand that—in this instance—you almost always sound annoying to everyone else in the room. You sound like every other person who’s ever complained about how we “shouldn’t joke about that.” In this instance, there’s nothing special, moving, or compelling about your voice. If a joke fails with an audience, a joke fails. If it fails repeatedly, it’s probably either not funny or not delivered well. If it’s not funny, it shouldn’t be told. But at a COMEDY show, that’s literally the only reason to censor yourself—because what you were gonna say was overwhelming not funny—not because it “wasn’t appropriate.” If you can’t take the heat, get out of the kitchen, snowflakes. *and no, this isn’t me saying I thought the joke—or the special (which I haven’t seen)—was funny.

Natalie Jean Beisner

112,966 views • 2 years ago

This should make every American furious If you go to the UK to buy diapers for your baby, they are about 10x cheaper than in America A 60 pack of diapers only cost £1.69, which is $2.28 in US money I looked into why this is and it’s exactly what you’d expect - Europe has more private-label supermarket brands dominating, keeping margins low. The US is dominated by only a couple brands that are arguably monopolies with much higher profit margins - Diapers are zero-rated for sales tax in the UK, saving roughly 20% - US has “less price competition”…. This is code for monopolies run the industry Because of this in America we regularly pay about 8-10x the price for diapers as opposed to the UK This just shows how bad we are being robbed blind and how cheap these really are to make

This should make every American furious If you go to the UK to buy diapers for your baby, they are about 10x cheaper than in America A 60 pack of diapers only cost £1.69, which is $2.28 in US money I looked into why this is and it’s exactly what you’d expect - Europe has more private-label supermarket brands dominating, keeping margins low. The US is dominated by only a couple brands that are arguably monopolies with much higher profit margins - Diapers are zero-rated for sales tax in the UK, saving roughly 20% - US has “less price competition”…. This is code for monopolies run the industry Because of this in America we regularly pay about 8-10x the price for diapers as opposed to the UK This just shows how bad we are being robbed blind and how cheap these really are to make

Wall Street Apes

120,051 views • 3 months ago

Sam Presti defines the real goal of leadership “In this job as a leader, what you want to do is build teams that you wish you could have been a part of.” “We talk about our seasons as chapters. In order to best understand your story, you need to see it horizontally, not vertically.” “Every year, our goal is to repeat a process—not chase an outcome. The process is to position our team and organization so that, if we are fortunate enough to have things break our way, we can achieve ultimate success.” “What makes great teams lasting isn’t that they defeated their opponents. It’s that they also defeated the circumstances that stood in their way during their journey.” “We have a chance to be a team that makes our mark over time. But we will not make our singular mark every single time.” “That’s just not how this works. NBA history tells us there are no final victories.”

Sam Presti defines the real goal of leadership “In this job as a leader, what you want to do is build teams that you wish you could have been a part of.” “We talk about our seasons as chapters. In order to best understand your story, you need to see it horizontally, not vertically.” “Every year, our goal is to repeat a process—not chase an outcome. The process is to position our team and organization so that, if we are fortunate enough to have things break our way, we can achieve ultimate success.” “What makes great teams lasting isn’t that they defeated their opponents. It’s that they also defeated the circumstances that stood in their way during their journey.” “We have a chance to be a team that makes our mark over time. But we will not make our singular mark every single time.” “That’s just not how this works. NBA history tells us there are no final victories.”

Josh Chambers

228,438 views • 23 days ago

We need to stop this big mfer. People don’t realize how important this is. It’s not just about him, it’s about pushing back on garbage influencers and raising the standard. We’re literally sliding into Idiocracy. If this keeps going, what does it look like in two years? This guy is 100% going to inspire others to do the same, creating a new wave of influencers dancing, yelling, and being loud and annoying everywhere. As a society, we need to draw a line and say enough is enough. The only real solution I see is to boycott the places that pay for this. If using these kinds of influencers becomes a net negative for businesses, they’ll stop. Money is the only thing that will make them listen. I’m going to keep this movement going as long as I can to raise the standard. This restaurant is Bigtime Eatz in Michigan. TOGETHER, WE STOP IDIOCRACY ✊

We need to stop this big mfer. People don’t realize how important this is. It’s not just about him, it’s about pushing back on garbage influencers and raising the standard. We’re literally sliding into Idiocracy. If this keeps going, what does it look like in two years? This guy is 100% going to inspire others to do the same, creating a new wave of influencers dancing, yelling, and being loud and annoying everywhere. As a society, we need to draw a line and say enough is enough. The only real solution I see is to boycott the places that pay for this. If using these kinds of influencers becomes a net negative for businesses, they’ll stop. Money is the only thing that will make them listen. I’m going to keep this movement going as long as I can to raise the standard. This restaurant is Bigtime Eatz in Michigan. TOGETHER, WE STOP IDIOCRACY ✊

Dr. Clown, PhD

818,595 views • 4 months ago

Barry Sternlicht recently gave a VERY insightful interview about tariffs and what it means for real estate prices - what he said is troubling: "The promotion of American manufacturing is a great idea, but we are not a manufacturing nation... We only have 13 million jobs of 160 million in manufacturing, and we're running a 4% unemployment rate. So I'm not sure who's going to work in all these factories. We're going to need some really quick efforts from Musk and Zuckerberg in robotics to actually build, have people work in these factories. Americans don't want to do that. That's not the jobs that they're interested in taking today... I think the tariffs are super complicated... I do think the focus should be on China. We run a $250 billion trade deficit with China... China is [the] second largest economy in the world with a fixed currency. And that alone is not right. That currency should go up and down with trade flows like every other major currency. So you start there. And I don't think the tariffs are tactical. And the if you put them in place, as [Trump] just did with steel tariffs, American companies will raise prices. So it is very inflationary. And for real estate, it's really bad. [For example] we need [Canada's] lumber. Or we can chop down our own trees but it's a bad thing. We run an equal trade deficit with Canada other than oil but we use their oil... if we don't buy it, they're going to ship it to Asia. For existing owners [of real estate], it's good because to build a new building will be more expensive. So the existing office stock, the existing apartment stock is going to be worth more. But it's bad because the numbers won't work to create new [buildings]. You won't be able to build anything. We already have a four to five million unit housing shortage... And you're seeing it in the sentiment of the builders that they're nervous. Everyone's a little nervous."

Barry Sternlicht recently gave a VERY insightful interview about tariffs and what it means for real estate prices - what he said is troubling: "The promotion of American manufacturing is a great idea, but we are not a manufacturing nation... We only have 13 million jobs of 160 million in manufacturing, and we're running a 4% unemployment rate. So I'm not sure who's going to work in all these factories. We're going to need some really quick efforts from Musk and Zuckerberg in robotics to actually build, have people work in these factories. Americans don't want to do that. That's not the jobs that they're interested in taking today... I think the tariffs are super complicated... I do think the focus should be on China. We run a $250 billion trade deficit with China... China is [the] second largest economy in the world with a fixed currency. And that alone is not right. That currency should go up and down with trade flows like every other major currency. So you start there. And I don't think the tariffs are tactical. And the if you put them in place, as [Trump] just did with steel tariffs, American companies will raise prices. So it is very inflationary. And for real estate, it's really bad. [For example] we need [Canada's] lumber. Or we can chop down our own trees but it's a bad thing. We run an equal trade deficit with Canada other than oil but we use their oil... if we don't buy it, they're going to ship it to Asia. For existing owners [of real estate], it's good because to build a new building will be more expensive. So the existing office stock, the existing apartment stock is going to be worth more. But it's bad because the numbers won't work to create new [buildings]. You won't be able to build anything. We already have a four to five million unit housing shortage... And you're seeing it in the sentiment of the builders that they're nervous. Everyone's a little nervous."

Triple Net Investor

177,868 views • 1 year ago

Sanders: You know why Trump has a nucleus of support? People say, “I go out and I vote every two years. You tell me to vote every four years. So what? I’m going nowhere. Democracy is not working. You know what I need? I need a strong guy. I don’t give a damn about the Constitution, the rule of law. Give me some guy who’s going to crack some heads.” It’s not just in this country. You’re seeing this all over the world. So what we have got to do is make democracy work for working people. If tomorrow, God willing, we passed a Medicare for All single-payer system so everybody in this country could get quality health care, people would say, “Huh, you know what? Democracy, that ain’t a bad idea.” “I just took my kid to the doctor. We had an operation. It didn’t cost me. That’s pretty good. And you know what? My kid is going to college now, a really good school, and it’s tuition-free. I like democracy.” So democracy is more than just having elections every two or four years. It is delivering for the people. And the problem that we’re having right now is that because the oligarchs increasingly control our democracy, democracy can’t deliver.

Sanders: You know why Trump has a nucleus of support? People say, “I go out and I vote every two years. You tell me to vote every four years. So what? I’m going nowhere. Democracy is not working. You know what I need? I need a strong guy. I don’t give a damn about the Constitution, the rule of law. Give me some guy who’s going to crack some heads.” It’s not just in this country. You’re seeing this all over the world. So what we have got to do is make democracy work for working people. If tomorrow, God willing, we passed a Medicare for All single-payer system so everybody in this country could get quality health care, people would say, “Huh, you know what? Democracy, that ain’t a bad idea.” “I just took my kid to the doctor. We had an operation. It didn’t cost me. That’s pretty good. And you know what? My kid is going to college now, a really good school, and it’s tuition-free. I like democracy.” So democracy is more than just having elections every two or four years. It is delivering for the people. And the problem that we’re having right now is that because the oligarchs increasingly control our democracy, democracy can’t deliver.

Acyn

157,888 views • 3 months ago

China is now the dominant player in frontier tech manufacturing. And the west is starting to fall behind more and more in multiple industries – How did that happen? The common narrative in the West is: "state grants" + "IP theft" – but that's not really the story. The real story is supplier networks and massive investments from western companies. China isn't the villain in this story. We are the idiots. In multiple frontier industries we are repeating the same mistake: First modern electronics, then phones, then EVs, now pharma. You cannot outsource manufacturing of frontier tech without becoming redundant in all other parts of the value chain too. Because whoever builds it, learns it, ultimately owns it. In this latest video we explore: 1) Why the West invested multiple times the Marshall plan into chinese manufacturing ecosystem 2) What worked and what didn't for China – eg cars didn't really take off until Tesla came and helped building their own competitors 3) Why we didn't only pay them to become market leaders in modern electronics, EVs, but now also in Pharma. 4) What the West could try to reverse this? Should we have more chinese factories in the West? Under which conditions? If we are serious about reindustrializing the West the first step is to understand better how we got to where we are now. This video is part of our deep-dive series on this topic. Full video-link in the reply 🔥

China is now the dominant player in frontier tech manufacturing. And the west is starting to fall behind more and more in multiple industries – How did that happen? The common narrative in the West is: "state grants" + "IP theft" – but that's not really the story. The real story is supplier networks and massive investments from western companies. China isn't the villain in this story. We are the idiots. In multiple frontier industries we are repeating the same mistake: First modern electronics, then phones, then EVs, now pharma. You cannot outsource manufacturing of frontier tech without becoming redundant in all other parts of the value chain too. Because whoever builds it, learns it, ultimately owns it. In this latest video we explore: 1) Why the West invested multiple times the Marshall plan into chinese manufacturing ecosystem 2) What worked and what didn't for China – eg cars didn't really take off until Tesla came and helped building their own competitors 3) Why we didn't only pay them to become market leaders in modern electronics, EVs, but now also in Pharma. 4) What the West could try to reverse this? Should we have more chinese factories in the West? Under which conditions? If we are serious about reindustrializing the West the first step is to understand better how we got to where we are now. This video is part of our deep-dive series on this topic. Full video-link in the reply 🔥

Andreas Klinger 🦾

28,260 views • 8 months ago

Many still don’t understand why Elon is building Terafab Terafab is an extension to all the chip makers in the world It’s not about replacement, not a rivalry and absolutely not competing It’s being built to fulfill the massive chip orders that Tesla, SpaceX and xAI actually need TSMC’s most advanced 2nm capacity is totally booked through 2028 Tesla signed a massive $16.5 billion deal with Samsung back in July 2025 to produce AI6 chips at their Taylor, Texas factory and Samsung is building a Tesla Exclusive chip manufacturing plant to full fill this orders When Elon announced Terafab on March 21, 2026...he made it clear: “That rate is much less than we’d like. We either build the Terafab or we don’t have the chips, and we need the chips, so we build the Terafab” He basically told the chip makers: “Produce as much as you comfortably can. We will take them all. Actually we want even more” Even today Elon said: "SpaceX/Tesla will be always be major customers of TSMC and not competitors in the normal sense of the word" Current production rates are much less than they need....That’s why Terafab exists Terafab is an extension to every chip maker… not competition, not rivalry, absolutely not Even Intel has joined as a partner Even if chip supply improves, massive bottlenecks still exist with memory and advanced packaging You simply can't risk those supply chain breaks at this scale That’s why Terafab is being built to vertically integrate everything - chips, memory, advanced packaging all under one roof, targeting 1 terawatt of AI compute capacity per year This is a ludicrous amount of chips that no chipmaker currently produces at this scale. I don't think even TSMC and Samsung truly understand these numbers yet It’s about building the capacity the future actually demands

Many still don’t understand why Elon is building Terafab Terafab is an extension to all the chip makers in the world It’s not about replacement, not a rivalry and absolutely not competing It’s being built to fulfill the massive chip orders that Tesla, SpaceX and xAI actually need TSMC’s most advanced 2nm capacity is totally booked through 2028 Tesla signed a massive $16.5 billion deal with Samsung back in July 2025 to produce AI6 chips at their Taylor, Texas factory and Samsung is building a Tesla Exclusive chip manufacturing plant to full fill this orders When Elon announced Terafab on March 21, 2026...he made it clear: “That rate is much less than we’d like. We either build the Terafab or we don’t have the chips, and we need the chips, so we build the Terafab” He basically told the chip makers: “Produce as much as you comfortably can. We will take them all. Actually we want even more” Even today Elon said: "SpaceX/Tesla will be always be major customers of TSMC and not competitors in the normal sense of the word" Current production rates are much less than they need....That’s why Terafab exists Terafab is an extension to every chip maker… not competition, not rivalry, absolutely not Even Intel has joined as a partner Even if chip supply improves, massive bottlenecks still exist with memory and advanced packaging You simply can't risk those supply chain breaks at this scale That’s why Terafab is being built to vertically integrate everything - chips, memory, advanced packaging all under one roof, targeting 1 terawatt of AI compute capacity per year This is a ludicrous amount of chips that no chipmaker currently produces at this scale. I don't think even TSMC and Samsung truly understand these numbers yet It’s about building the capacity the future actually demands

X Freeze

53,291 views • 4 months ago

FLEX TALK X JOONGDUNK #Flex1045xDareYouToDeath #จุงดัง #JoongDunk 🌞 sometimes if there’s a problem, talking right away might not really be the solution. for some problems talking it out immediately might be the best solutionright? but sometimes you need to go back and reflect on yourself first and then sit down and talk again 🌞 or when we assume that we’re going to sit down and our first statement might not have been something thought through very carefully.. and because we are partners we have to care about each other’s feelings more than anyone else. some things we say might be fine when said to other people but when it’s him, he might think deeply about it. what’s normal for others but we need to be extra careful with when it comes to this person. we have to be much more careful especially with our words because sometimes things we don’t think would hurt him might actually hurt him without us even realizing it so we have to sit down and study each other: what things are sensitive for him - what he cares about - what he needs. and then we have to sit down and talk again about… how to handle it together 🌻honestly i feel the same way. i feel like this is something that’s really useful. the closer we get the more we need to study each other — what this person likes - what this person don’t like. : it’s not just about constantly “courting” each other 🌞and this kind of care wasn’t always there from the beginning. caring deeply about someone close to you sometimes develops gradually and sometimes we end up neglecting the person who’s closest to us without realizing it 🌻i’m gonna cry bro 🌞no! when that happens we just sit down and talk about it — “what i did made you feel bad” then i apologize 🌻it’s simple: if this person doesn’t like something don’t do it 🌞if this person like something do it for them 🌞if accidentally do something he don’t like then apologize : it feels like we get to know each other more and more over time. it’s about continuously learning each other and caring for each other — 🌞and that never really ends because people change. who we were before may not be who we are now. like me and Dunk — Dunk wasn’t like this before so i have to study my friend again about his new things: how he’s grown - how he’s changed - the direction he’s moving in… things he used to like back then he might not like anymore. the food he enjoyed - the clothes he liked to wear — today they might be different. so we keep learning each other over and over again

FLEX TALK X JOONGDUNK #Flex1045xDareYouToDeath #จุงดัง #JoongDunk 🌞 sometimes if there’s a problem, talking right away might not really be the solution. for some problems talking it out immediately might be the best solutionright? but sometimes you need to go back and reflect on yourself first and then sit down and talk again 🌞 or when we assume that we’re going to sit down and our first statement might not have been something thought through very carefully.. and because we are partners we have to care about each other’s feelings more than anyone else. some things we say might be fine when said to other people but when it’s him, he might think deeply about it. what’s normal for others but we need to be extra careful with when it comes to this person. we have to be much more careful especially with our words because sometimes things we don’t think would hurt him might actually hurt him without us even realizing it so we have to sit down and study each other: what things are sensitive for him - what he cares about - what he needs. and then we have to sit down and talk again about… how to handle it together 🌻honestly i feel the same way. i feel like this is something that’s really useful. the closer we get the more we need to study each other — what this person likes - what this person don’t like. : it’s not just about constantly “courting” each other 🌞and this kind of care wasn’t always there from the beginning. caring deeply about someone close to you sometimes develops gradually and sometimes we end up neglecting the person who’s closest to us without realizing it 🌻i’m gonna cry bro 🌞no! when that happens we just sit down and talk about it — “what i did made you feel bad” then i apologize 🌻it’s simple: if this person doesn’t like something don’t do it 🌞if this person like something do it for them 🌞if accidentally do something he don’t like then apologize : it feels like we get to know each other more and more over time. it’s about continuously learning each other and caring for each other — 🌞and that never really ends because people change. who we were before may not be who we are now. like me and Dunk — Dunk wasn’t like this before so i have to study my friend again about his new things: how he’s grown - how he’s changed - the direction he’s moving in… things he used to like back then he might not like anymore. the food he enjoyed - the clothes he liked to wear — today they might be different. so we keep learning each other over and over again

🇻🇳Jaidee’s aunt Bamnie🐣

22,368 views • 7 months ago

$Elon Musk was asked how he’d manufacture satellites at scale. He described building a factory on the moon. And almost nobody caught what he was laying out. Musk: “The lunar soil is like 20% silicon. So you can mine the silicon on the moon, refine it, and create the solar cells and the radiators on the moon.” He’s not talking about going to the moon. He’s talking about turning it into a production line. Mining silicon from lunar soil. Refining it on the surface. Building solar cells from materials already in the ground. Building radiators from aluminum buried in the dust. No supply ships. No trillion-dollar cargo drops. Extract, refine, build. On site. Musk: “You can make the radiators out of aluminum. There’s plenty of silicon and aluminum on the moon.” The physics backs every word. Lunar regolith is loaded with silicon and aluminum oxide. One-sixth gravity means launching finished products into orbit costs a fraction of the energy. No atmosphere means zero drag, zero weather, zero corrosion. For manufacturing, the moon isn’t just viable. It’s superior to Earth. Musk: “The chips you could send from Earth, ‘cause they’re pretty light.” That’s a complete off-world supply chain in twelve words. Heavy components sourced from lunar materials. Lightweight chips shipped from Earth at minimal cost. The full framework for off-planet manufacturing, solved in a single sentence. This isn’t a theorist speculating. This is the man who already lands orbital rockets on ocean barges. Running supply chain math out loud in real time. And nobody is sitting with what comes next. If the moon becomes a manufacturing base, Earth doesn’t stay at the center of anything. Earth becomes a chip supplier. The planet that invented writing, built every empire, launched the Enlightenment. Reduced to a parts vendor for a lunar factory. Every civilization in history was built on the same bet. Control land, resources, and trade routes on this planet. Every war. Every treaty. Every border. All fought over the same thin crust of rock and water. Musk is the first person engineering around that entire system. The most strategic territory in the solar system won’t be on this planet. It’ll be a quarter million miles above it. Whoever controls lunar manufacturing controls orbital infrastructure. Energy systems. Communication networks. Satellite constellations that blanket the planet below. Not through military force. Through supply chain. The nation that builds factories on the moon doesn’t need to win wars down here. They already hold the highest ground that’s ever existed. And right now, one man’s company is the only operation on Earth with the launch infrastructure to make any of this real. Built over twenty years while the rest of the industry called reusable rocketry impossible. He didn’t build a rocket company. He built the only road off this planet that works. We looked at the moon for ten thousand years and saw something sacred. One man looked up and saw a supply chain. The poets had the moon for millennia. The engineers just took it.$

Elon Musk was asked how he’d manufacture satellites at scale. He described building a factory on the moon. And almost nobody caught what he was laying out. Musk: “The lunar soil is like 20% silicon. So you can mine the silicon on the moon, refine it, and create the solar cells and the radiators on the moon.” He’s not talking about going to the moon. He’s talking about turning it into a production line. Mining silicon from lunar soil. Refining it on the surface. Building solar cells from materials already in the ground. Building radiators from aluminum buried in the dust. No supply ships. No trillion-dollar cargo drops. Extract, refine, build. On site. Musk: “You can make the radiators out of aluminum. There’s plenty of silicon and aluminum on the moon.” The physics backs every word. Lunar regolith is loaded with silicon and aluminum oxide. One-sixth gravity means launching finished products into orbit costs a fraction of the energy. No atmosphere means zero drag, zero weather, zero corrosion. For manufacturing, the moon isn’t just viable. It’s superior to Earth. Musk: “The chips you could send from Earth, ‘cause they’re pretty light.” That’s a complete off-world supply chain in twelve words. Heavy components sourced from lunar materials. Lightweight chips shipped from Earth at minimal cost. The full framework for off-planet manufacturing, solved in a single sentence. This isn’t a theorist speculating. This is the man who already lands orbital rockets on ocean barges. Running supply chain math out loud in real time. And nobody is sitting with what comes next. If the moon becomes a manufacturing base, Earth doesn’t stay at the center of anything. Earth becomes a chip supplier. The planet that invented writing, built every empire, launched the Enlightenment. Reduced to a parts vendor for a lunar factory. Every civilization in history was built on the same bet. Control land, resources, and trade routes on this planet. Every war. Every treaty. Every border. All fought over the same thin crust of rock and water. Musk is the first person engineering around that entire system. The most strategic territory in the solar system won’t be on this planet. It’ll be a quarter million miles above it. Whoever controls lunar manufacturing controls orbital infrastructure. Energy systems. Communication networks. Satellite constellations that blanket the planet below. Not through military force. Through supply chain. The nation that builds factories on the moon doesn’t need to win wars down here. They already hold the highest ground that’s ever existed. And right now, one man’s company is the only operation on Earth with the launch infrastructure to make any of this real. Built over twenty years while the rest of the industry called reusable rocketry impossible. He didn’t build a rocket company. He built the only road off this planet that works. We looked at the moon for ten thousand years and saw something sacred. One man looked up and saw a supply chain. The poets had the moon for millennia. The engineers just took it.

Dustin

73,558 views • 3 months ago

If you care about manufacturing or industry in the West you need to understand how China can produce so cheaply. In the 90s people would have said cheap labor. Now they would say supply chain. The real answer is insane hypercompetition in a race to the bottom. The Chinese call this involution. Everyone competes until there is no margin left. The West believes it’s China vs the world. For Chinese companies it’s China vs China and a permanent Hunger Games just to survive. We break down how it works in our deep-dive. Full video in our channel: We cover the coffee wars , the EV race to the bottom that currently bankrupts Germany, cities that act like VCs, a wedding photographer that build a global top 10 car brands,cement plants getting sold by the state to buy car factories from Wales. How top-down policies and bottom-up hustle works, and how we in the middle will get squeezed by China Shocks every year from now on.

If you care about manufacturing or industry in the West you need to understand how China can produce so cheaply. In the 90s people would have said cheap labor. Now they would say supply chain. The real answer is insane hypercompetition in a race to the bottom. The Chinese call this involution. Everyone competes until there is no margin left. The West believes it’s China vs the world. For Chinese companies it’s China vs China and a permanent Hunger Games just to survive. We break down how it works in our deep-dive. Full video in our channel: We cover the coffee wars , the EV race to the bottom that currently bankrupts Germany, cities that act like VCs, a wedding photographer that build a global top 10 car brands,cement plants getting sold by the state to buy car factories from Wales. How top-down policies and bottom-up hustle works, and how we in the middle will get squeezed by China Shocks every year from now on.

Andreas Klinger 🦾

30,040 views • 4 days ago

This video is nothing short of a miracle. We understand that no one enjoys being pulled over, but this is a perfect example of why officers do what we do. Seat belts and child safety seats are incredibly important, especially for our youngest passengers. Even if you follow every traffic law and do everything right behind the wheel, there's always a chance another driver won't. In this crash, a child was ejected from the vehicle and, amazingly, walked away with only a few minor scratches. As we've discussed in previous posts about Operation Summer Brake, Gwinnett County Police is focusing on traffic violations that contribute to serious injury and fatal crashes. This video serves as a reminder that traffic enforcement is not just about writing citations. It's about preventing tragedies and keeping our community safe. Please take a few extra seconds to make sure everyone in your vehicle is properly restrained before every trip. In this case, those few seconds could have made all the difference.

This video is nothing short of a miracle. We understand that no one enjoys being pulled over, but this is a perfect example of why officers do what we do. Seat belts and child safety seats are incredibly important, especially for our youngest passengers. Even if you follow every traffic law and do everything right behind the wheel, there's always a chance another driver won't. In this crash, a child was ejected from the vehicle and, amazingly, walked away with only a few minor scratches. As we've discussed in previous posts about Operation Summer Brake, Gwinnett County Police is focusing on traffic violations that contribute to serious injury and fatal crashes. This video serves as a reminder that traffic enforcement is not just about writing citations. It's about preventing tragedies and keeping our community safe. Please take a few extra seconds to make sure everyone in your vehicle is properly restrained before every trip. In this case, those few seconds could have made all the difference.

Gwinnett County Police

14,483 views • 2 months ago