Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Many developing football countries often overlook a crucial aspect when it comes to nurturing young talent. The key lies not only in coaching but in fostering a deep bond between a child and the ball. Rather than focusing solely on technical skills, it is vital to spark a child's...

12,808 просмотров • 2 лет назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 6

Фото профиля Kudakwashe
Kudakwashe2 лет назад

This make a lot of sense i coach U12 I have noticed during training they just want to be on the ball even after we done training they still want to kick it during, before and after.

Фото профиля Mutanda Kwesele
Mutanda Kwesele1 год назад

@FUNinoCA Love it, @tomsan106 ! How old is the little one in this video at time of recording?

Фото профиля Tom Byerトム•バイヤー
Tom Byerトム•バイヤー1 год назад

@FUNinoCA He was 5yrs old.

Фото профиля Graeme Bandeira
Graeme Bandeira1 год назад

You seen this @StuartOwenSD 👏

Фото профиля Joe Brilla
Joe Brilla2 лет назад

@PFL_Fans_United Is this the same methodology applied by successful footballers’ parent during their childhood? Can you try to name a few top players who benefited from this idea?

Фото профиля Tom Byerトム•バイヤー
Tom Byerトム•バイヤー2 лет назад

@PFL_Fans_United Here’s a few. 😉⚽️

Похожие видео

All the best coaching in the world at the youngest ages is rendered useless if a child hasn’t developed the ability to focus their attention. You can bring the best coach in the world to your child’s training session and if they don’t pay full attention absolutely nothing takes place. Similar to inside a classroom where you can bring the teacher of the year to your child’s classroom and if they don’t focus and pay attention, learning does not take place. So it’s not always the case of good or bad coaching it’s often the case a child’s lack of ability to learn by not focusing on what is being taught. This is especially true for the youngest ages. This video is an example of a 5yr old child focusing their attention, trying to control an object with their feet, the ball. This becomes a mental task, married together with the action of movement, making it a physical task as well. The brain loves to learn while moving. Combining, mind and body, thinking and feeling, this allows the cerebellum, the seat of the unconscious mind, to create a chemical signature of this experience, which is emotions. Emotions are the on off switch for learning. Couple in a parent being present, this becomes a shared experience together, where the child is constantly seeking the parents approval, attention, and praise which creates a chemical electrical process in the body which is emotions. This facilitates, deep learning, and long-term memory, all disguised as playtime. A parent just being present allows for this experience to take place. A child this young rarely starts playing or exercising with a ball without someone being present. Being present and sharing this experience together is key for the learning process to take place. These movements are being stored in the non-declared memory which makes this implicit learning when you do something so many times it becomes natural and outside your conscious awareness. Like riding a bicycle or driving a car.

Tom Byerトム•バイヤー

26,691 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨 Regarding Croatia's disallowed goal, this "super slow-motion" replay shows that the ball was indeed almost certainly touched by Matanović—at the very least, a graze of the hair. We can obviously question the "spirit" of how the rules are applied here, but since technology allows us to detect even the slightest micro-touch of the ball, we might as well use it. 🤯 HOWEVER, the main aspect of this decision to analyze is the subsequent header deflection by Veiga. Indeed, two questions arise here (in relation to the Laws of the Game): - Was it a "deliberate play" on his part or not ? If it is deliberate, he plays the Croatian player behind him onside. If it is not, offside should be called. - Was it a save ? (i.e., "preventing or attempting to prevent the ball from going into or very close to the goal"). If it is a save, then offside must be called. According to the Laws of the Game: "The following criteria should be used, as appropriate, as indicators that a player had control of the ball and, as a result, can be considered to have 'deliberately played' the ball: - The ball had travelled from distance and the player had a clear view of it; - The ball was not moving quickly; - The direction of the ball was not unexpected; - The player had time to coordinate their body movement, i.e. it was not a case of instinctive stretching or jumping, or a movement that achieved limited contact/control; - A ball on the ground is much easier to play than a ball in the air." We are therefore in the realm of pure referee interpretation. While waiting for our referees' analysis, my personal view is that the ball's trajectory was absolutely not altered by Matanović's "hair". Therefore, Veiga made a deliberate play, as he had time to coordinate his movement to head the ball. Furthermore, since the ball was not heading towards the goal, it cannot be considered a save. Consequently, he would have played the Croatian player behind him (Pašalić) onside. HNS Portugal #WC2026 #Refereeing

Check VAR World Cup

73,796 просмотров • 6 дней назад