Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Many have concluded that the Cesarewitch winner will definitely be disqualified, but have a close look at this. I think the 10th and final use of the whip might well have missed the horse and if so, it won’t be counted. It’s certainly worth a close look with better...

582,630 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

9 Comments

Kevin Blake's profile picture
Kevin Blake1 year ago

For clarity, there have been cases in the past where the Whip Review Committee have found that what had initially been perceived as a whip strike on the day didn't actually make contact with the horse, so it was discounted. That is the case that is likely to be made here.

Kevin Blake's profile picture
Kevin Blake1 year ago

To clarify the rules, the limit on whip strikes on the Flat is six, but horses are only disqualified in cases of 10 strikes or more. Thus, whether that 10th strike is counted or not will decide if he is disqualified.

Mr Jim McGrath's profile picture
Mr Jim McGrath1 year ago

🤣🤣 That really would add another spoonful to the dog’s breakfast of a situation!

Chris Poole's profile picture
Chris Poole1 year ago

Another slight issue to the ‘it is easy to sort in 15mins and amend result for betting purposes’ argument.

🏎🏍 Emma 🐎📸's profile picture
🏎🏍 Emma 🐎📸1 year ago

9 is still far too many imo.

Aidan Coleman's profile picture
Aidan Coleman1 year ago

Any betting for him not to be disqualified 😅

Will O’Neill's profile picture
Will O’Neill1 year ago

You are normally very credible, Kevin! Stop it now, it's .embarrassing

The Right Man🏇🏇's profile picture
The Right Man🏇🏇1 year ago

The whole situation is embarrassing. The inference that 9 smacks of the whip is somehow okay but one more, the difference between winning and losing. I mean, it's utter nonsense isn't it?

Ginger Joe Racing & Golf's profile picture
Ginger Joe Racing & Golf1 year ago

Even if he missed with that one it’s still too many

Related Videos