正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Many have concluded that the Cesarewitch winner will definitely be disqualified, but have a close look at this. I think the 10th and final use of the whip might well have missed the horse and if so, it won’t be counted. It’s certainly worth a close look with better...

582,630 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

9 条评论

Kevin Blake 的头像
Kevin Blake1 年前

For clarity, there have been cases in the past where the Whip Review Committee have found that what had initially been perceived as a whip strike on the day didn't actually make contact with the horse, so it was discounted. That is the case that is likely to be made here.

Kevin Blake 的头像
Kevin Blake1 年前

To clarify the rules, the limit on whip strikes on the Flat is six, but horses are only disqualified in cases of 10 strikes or more. Thus, whether that 10th strike is counted or not will decide if he is disqualified.

Mr Jim McGrath 的头像
Mr Jim McGrath1 年前

🤣🤣 That really would add another spoonful to the dog’s breakfast of a situation!

Chris Poole 的头像
Chris Poole1 年前

Another slight issue to the ‘it is easy to sort in 15mins and amend result for betting purposes’ argument.

🏎🏍 Emma 🐎📸 的头像
🏎🏍 Emma 🐎📸1 年前

9 is still far too many imo.

Aidan Coleman 的头像
Aidan Coleman1 年前

Any betting for him not to be disqualified 😅

Will O’Neill 的头像
Will O’Neill1 年前

You are normally very credible, Kevin! Stop it now, it's .embarrassing

The Right Man🏇🏇 的头像
The Right Man🏇🏇1 年前

The whole situation is embarrassing. The inference that 9 smacks of the whip is somehow okay but one more, the difference between winning and losing. I mean, it's utter nonsense isn't it?

Ginger Joe Racing & Golf 的头像
Ginger Joe Racing & Golf1 年前

Even if he missed with that one it’s still too many

相关视频