Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Many reports and on-the-ground developments point to a regional project led by the United Arab Emirates that operates behind the scenes through local proxies and questionable alliances, with the aim of fragmenting states and gaining control over strategic ports and maritime chokepoints. This approach is closely linked to political... and security coordination with Israel, serving narrow interests at the expense of regional stability and Arab national security. In Yemen, this role became evident through political and military support for Aidarous Al-Zubaidi and the Southern Transitional Council. What began as influence over southern areas escalated into attempts to impose a fait accompli by force, including efforts to seize control of Hadramout and Al-Mahra—two regions of extreme strategic and security importance to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This was pursued through the creation of armed formations outside the framework of the legitimate state, the fragmentation of society, and the engineering of internal conflicts that threaten Yemen’s unity and the security of its neighbors. In Sudan, the UAE has been linked to backing specific military actors, contributing to the outbreak and prolongation of a devastating internal war that crippled state institutions and pushed the country toward de facto division. This chaos has opened the door to competition over gold, ports, and influence along the Red Sea, undermining any prospect of a stable and sovereign Sudan. In Libya, a similar pattern emerged through the financing and arming of forces operating outside the political process. This prolonged the conflict, sabotaged state-building efforts, and turned Libya into a proxy battlefield, draining its resources and exploiting its strategic location and energy wealth. In Somalia, the UAE supported separatist entities and port projects conducted outside the authority of the federal government in Mogadishu. These moves undermined Somali sovereignty and sought to impose new realities on the ground, granting Abu Dhabi direct leverage over one of the world’s most critical maritime routes near Bab Al-Mandab and the Gulf of Aden. This recurring pattern reveals a single approach: weakening sovereign states, marginalizing national armies, empowering militias, controlling ports, and then building political and economic ties with Israel under the banner of investment—while Arab peoples bear the cost. Despite all this, such schemes have failed when confronted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia is not an arena for manipulation nor a state that can be encircled by militias or pressured through ports. It is a nation rooted in legitimacy, supported by its people, and anchored in deep Arab and Islamic standing. Those who have attempted to undermine or weaken it have ultimately lost—politically, morally, and historically. An Emirati commentator is seen openly calling on a terrorist known as ‘Abu Lu’lu’ah’ to slaughter innocent civilians—children, women, and the elderly—in a shocking incitement to violence.” #politics #trending #viral #conservative #liberal #democrat #republican #usa #europe #geopolitics #news #foryou #foryoupage #politicstiktok #alliesonrafah #WorldPolitics #GlobalSecurity #MiddleEast #HumanRights #Peace #Stability #Freedom #fyp #viralvideo #trendingnow #socialmedia #globalnews #Resistance #IamHere #MiddleEast #Geopolitics #RedSea #BabAlMandab #Yemen #Sudan #Libya #Somalia #HornOfAfrica #MaritimeSecurity #SaudiArabia #UAE #Israel #StateSovereignty #RegionalSecurity #ProxyWarsshow more

عبدالوهاب بن محمد القحطاني

308,353 subscribers

249,169 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Stephen Gluck

Stephen Gluck9 месяцев назад

Without a clear path linking Rabat to Khartoum, the Sahel becomes a desert ocean of piracy. Without a fundamental change in Saudi Arabian business strategy, things won't change anytime soon. I did what I could for the Saudis in Morocco, but I'm still a nobody.

Фото профиля صباح أحمد

صباح أحمد9 месяцев назад

عليه من الله ما يستحق

Фото профиля يوميات إبن الشمال🇾🇪

يوميات إبن الشمال🇾🇪9 месяцев назад

لا سلم الله الإمارات

Фото профиля N

N9 месяцев назад

حسبي الله ونعم الوكيل فيهم

Фото профиля Jyothi Prabhu

Jyothi Prabhu9 месяцев назад

This fight amongst brothers lets West rule over you.

Фото профиля المرقاب

المرقاب9 месяцев назад

بدأت اشك ان الامارات هي الذراع بل رأس الحربه سياسيا وعسكريا لتنفيذ اجندة نظرية الفوضى الخلاقه ذات المنشأ الصهيوني (لويس) والتنفيذ الامريكي والتحريض الاسرائيلي والتواطئ الايراني والتجاهل التركي لان افعالها توحي بذلك،والمصارع لتنفيذ النظريه في الميدان هي السعوديه لوحدها ،والله اعلم

Фото профиля OMAR 🇦🇪 DXB

OMAR 🇦🇪 DXB9 месяцев назад

تكلم عن خاشقجي لو اللحية على وجه رجال

Фото профиля James Brown

James Brown9 месяцев назад

CUT THEM OFF

Фото профиля عبدالرزاق إبراهيم🇸🇩🇵🇸

عبدالرزاق إبراهيم🇸🇩🇵🇸9 месяцев назад

قريبا سيكون للمـ.ـجوس كلمة في جزيرة العرب الكل سيدفع ثمن

Фото профиля OMAR 🇦🇪 DXB

OMAR 🇦🇪 DXB9 месяцев назад

طبعا ناسخ الخبر ولا هو ما يعرف اسمه بالإنجليزي 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 عامل فيها مثقف

Похожие видео

● I’ve attended today a simulated special operation exercise conducted by the Counter-Terrorism Unit, involving a raid to free hostages and arrest terrorist elements. The exercise demonstrated a high level of readiness, efficiency, and discipline, and confirmed the professionalism this elite force has achieved through advanced training and qualification programs. These programs were conducted with direct support from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to whom we extend our sincere thanks and deep appreciation for their ongoing and genuine support in building the capabilities of Yemeni state institutions, particularly the security and military apparatus. ● Counterterrorism efforts must be managed exclusively through legitimate state institutions, within a clear legal and institutional framework that guarantees the rule of law, protects citizens' rights, and prevents a descent into chaos and the proliferation of power centers. Experience has proven that any security efforts carried out outside the authority of the state only complicate the situation, expand the scope of violations, and undermine opportunities for stability. The security lapses we have witnessed in some areas are a direct result of bypassing state institutions and operating outside their legitimate framework. ● The state affirms its unwavering commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms through an effective partnership and close coordination with the Coalition to Restore Legitimacy, led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and in cooperation with the international community. This commitment ensures respect for international humanitarian law, the protection of civilians, and the enhancement of security and stability at both the national and regional levels. ● The state is also committed to its national, regional, and international responsibilities in protecting international waterways and shipping lanes, which are vital arteries for global trade and regional security. This commitment is demonstrated through continuous cooperation with the Coalition to Restore Legitimacy and international partners, contributing to the preservation of maritime security, the protection of shared interests, and the deterrence of any threats to freedom of navigation and its security. ● Within the same context, the state will resolutely continue its joint efforts with the Coalition to Restore Legitimacy to combat arms smuggling to the Houthi terrorist militia and to cut off its sources of weapons. And its funding, given the direct threat this poses to national, regional, and international security, prolongs the conflict, and undermines peace prospects. ● The core of the Yemeni crisis remains the coup by the terrorist Houthi militia against the state and its legitimate institutions, and the resulting systematic destruction of the political, security, economic, and humanitarian situation. Therefore, restoring the state and ending the coup is a national priority that cannot be postponed. The state will continue to complete the liberation and restore its institutions, peacefully whenever possible, and by force when necessary, to preserve Yemen's sovereignty, security, stability, and unity of its national decision.

● I’ve attended today a simulated special operation exercise conducted by the Counter-Terrorism Unit, involving a raid to free hostages and arrest terrorist elements. The exercise demonstrated a high level of readiness, efficiency, and discipline, and confirmed the professionalism this elite force has achieved through advanced training and qualification programs. These programs were conducted with direct support from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, to whom we extend our sincere thanks and deep appreciation for their ongoing and genuine support in building the capabilities of Yemeni state institutions, particularly the security and military apparatus. ● Counterterrorism efforts must be managed exclusively through legitimate state institutions, within a clear legal and institutional framework that guarantees the rule of law, protects citizens' rights, and prevents a descent into chaos and the proliferation of power centers. Experience has proven that any security efforts carried out outside the authority of the state only complicate the situation, expand the scope of violations, and undermine opportunities for stability. The security lapses we have witnessed in some areas are a direct result of bypassing state institutions and operating outside their legitimate framework. ● The state affirms its unwavering commitment to combating terrorism in all its forms through an effective partnership and close coordination with the Coalition to Restore Legitimacy, led by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and in cooperation with the international community. This commitment ensures respect for international humanitarian law, the protection of civilians, and the enhancement of security and stability at both the national and regional levels. ● The state is also committed to its national, regional, and international responsibilities in protecting international waterways and shipping lanes, which are vital arteries for global trade and regional security. This commitment is demonstrated through continuous cooperation with the Coalition to Restore Legitimacy and international partners, contributing to the preservation of maritime security, the protection of shared interests, and the deterrence of any threats to freedom of navigation and its security. ● Within the same context, the state will resolutely continue its joint efforts with the Coalition to Restore Legitimacy to combat arms smuggling to the Houthi terrorist militia and to cut off its sources of weapons. And its funding, given the direct threat this poses to national, regional, and international security, prolongs the conflict, and undermines peace prospects. ● The core of the Yemeni crisis remains the coup by the terrorist Houthi militia against the state and its legitimate institutions, and the resulting systematic destruction of the political, security, economic, and humanitarian situation. Therefore, restoring the state and ending the coup is a national priority that cannot be postponed. The state will continue to complete the liberation and restore its institutions, peacefully whenever possible, and by force when necessary, to preserve Yemen's sovereignty, security, stability, and unity of its national decision.

معمر الإرياني

11,739 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Eritrea's Role as a Regional Stabilizing Force SUDAN ― Eritrea has long been a stabilizing force in the Horn of Africa, though its role is often misunderstood. When neighbors face moments of uncertainty, it is #Eritrea that quietly steps in to stand alongside them rather than watch from the sidelines, and its political, security, and diplomatic support often proving to be an antidote to crisis. Ethiopia's Abiy Ahmed and Somalia's Hassan Sheikh Mohamud experienced this firsthand. Today, Sudan is at the center of a devastating conflict and humanitarian crisis. Eritrea, despite its limited resources, has presented itself as a steadfast neighbor offering support to a country it always considers a brotherly nation. Reports suggest that thousands of Sudanese recruits who completed military training in Eritrea have returned to Sudan to bolster the country's defense efforts. Their return comes as Sudan finds itself encircled by a growing "ring of fire", as external actors like the #UAE and regional neighbors including #Ethiopia, #Chad, and #Libya, encircled Sudan with logistical supply lines, financial backing, and military support to a rival factions accused of genocide.

Eritrea's Role as a Regional Stabilizing Force SUDAN ― Eritrea has long been a stabilizing force in the Horn of Africa, though its role is often misunderstood. When neighbors face moments of uncertainty, it is #Eritrea that quietly steps in to stand alongside them rather than watch from the sidelines, and its political, security, and diplomatic support often proving to be an antidote to crisis. Ethiopia's Abiy Ahmed and Somalia's Hassan Sheikh Mohamud experienced this firsthand. Today, Sudan is at the center of a devastating conflict and humanitarian crisis. Eritrea, despite its limited resources, has presented itself as a steadfast neighbor offering support to a country it always considers a brotherly nation. Reports suggest that thousands of Sudanese recruits who completed military training in Eritrea have returned to Sudan to bolster the country's defense efforts. Their return comes as Sudan finds itself encircled by a growing "ring of fire", as external actors like the #UAE and regional neighbors including #Ethiopia, #Chad, and #Libya, encircled Sudan with logistical supply lines, financial backing, and military support to a rival factions accused of genocide.

ⓉⓃ

15,199 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

I would first like to reaffirm my full support for President General Joseph Aoun in the path he is leading to protect Lebanon, restore the full role of the state, and guide the country toward a just and lasting peace that preserves its sovereignty and serves the interests of its people. Any serious approach to saving Lebanon requires courage in decision-making and wisdom in managing sensitive national issues, foremost among them stability, security, and sovereignty. From this perspective, we support the option of direct negotiations with Israel in a manner that safeguards Lebanon’s supreme national interest, ensures stability in the South, and reaffirms the rights and full sovereignty of the Lebanese state and opens the way toward a real and lasting peace. We also reaffirm our full support for the government and its decisions in every sovereign step that restores the confidence of the Lebanese people and the international community in the Lebanese state and its institutions. In this context, we call on the government to move forward in dismantling the parallel and illegal economy, shutting down institutions such as “Al-Qard Al-Hassan,” preventing smuggling and illegal trade through all border crossings, ports, and the airport, and restructuring the banking sector and financial system to prevent the future financing and arming of militias by drying up their illicit financial resources. We also believe it is necessary to suspend the implementation of the 1955 boycott law, as its continued use as a tool of intimidation and fear obstructs the confidence-building measures required to achieve a genuine and lasting peace and prevents Lebanon from advancing toward realistic solutions that serve its highest national interests. I also stress the urgent need to accelerate the implementation of the decision to make Beirut a safe and weapons-free city under the sole authority of the state. The delay in beginning implementation is no longer justified and is draining the Lebanese people’s confidence in the state’s ability to enforce its decisions. Making Beirut free of weapons must be a sovereign Lebanese decision fully implemented by the Lebanese state, because the capital cannot recover its natural role and its political, economic, and cultural symbolism except under the sole authority of the state. The success of this step in Beirut would gradually pave the way for extending this process to the South, then to the North and the Bekaa, thereby consolidating the authority of the Lebanese state over all its territory and strengthening comprehensive national stability. At the same time, we call on Israel to fully abide by any understandings or arrangements reached, and to carry out a gradual withdrawal from Lebanese territory in a manner that guarantees stability and respects Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial unity, leading to a fully sovereign Lebanese state free from any illegal or foreign military presence. In parallel, we believe that the issue of general amnesty can no longer tolerate delay or political exploitation. The adoption of a fair and comprehensive general amnesty law has become a national and humanitarian necessity, Away from political point-scoring and political disputes. What is required today is a balanced approach that preserves the rights of the wronged, takes into account the humanitarian conditions of prisoners, and at the same time safeguards the dignity of the military institution while preserving security and stability. True justice cannot be selective; it must be comprehensive and balanced—protecting the nation, preserving human dignity, and safeguarding state institutions. Lebanon today needs a strong state, genuine transparency, and responsible decisions that lead to peace and restore hope to the Lebanese people. This is what we are working for.

I would first like to reaffirm my full support for President General Joseph Aoun in the path he is leading to protect Lebanon, restore the full role of the state, and guide the country toward a just and lasting peace that preserves its sovereignty and serves the interests of its people. Any serious approach to saving Lebanon requires courage in decision-making and wisdom in managing sensitive national issues, foremost among them stability, security, and sovereignty. From this perspective, we support the option of direct negotiations with Israel in a manner that safeguards Lebanon’s supreme national interest, ensures stability in the South, and reaffirms the rights and full sovereignty of the Lebanese state and opens the way toward a real and lasting peace. We also reaffirm our full support for the government and its decisions in every sovereign step that restores the confidence of the Lebanese people and the international community in the Lebanese state and its institutions. In this context, we call on the government to move forward in dismantling the parallel and illegal economy, shutting down institutions such as “Al-Qard Al-Hassan,” preventing smuggling and illegal trade through all border crossings, ports, and the airport, and restructuring the banking sector and financial system to prevent the future financing and arming of militias by drying up their illicit financial resources. We also believe it is necessary to suspend the implementation of the 1955 boycott law, as its continued use as a tool of intimidation and fear obstructs the confidence-building measures required to achieve a genuine and lasting peace and prevents Lebanon from advancing toward realistic solutions that serve its highest national interests. I also stress the urgent need to accelerate the implementation of the decision to make Beirut a safe and weapons-free city under the sole authority of the state. The delay in beginning implementation is no longer justified and is draining the Lebanese people’s confidence in the state’s ability to enforce its decisions. Making Beirut free of weapons must be a sovereign Lebanese decision fully implemented by the Lebanese state, because the capital cannot recover its natural role and its political, economic, and cultural symbolism except under the sole authority of the state. The success of this step in Beirut would gradually pave the way for extending this process to the South, then to the North and the Bekaa, thereby consolidating the authority of the Lebanese state over all its territory and strengthening comprehensive national stability. At the same time, we call on Israel to fully abide by any understandings or arrangements reached, and to carry out a gradual withdrawal from Lebanese territory in a manner that guarantees stability and respects Lebanon’s sovereignty and territorial unity, leading to a fully sovereign Lebanese state free from any illegal or foreign military presence. In parallel, we believe that the issue of general amnesty can no longer tolerate delay or political exploitation. The adoption of a fair and comprehensive general amnesty law has become a national and humanitarian necessity, Away from political point-scoring and political disputes. What is required today is a balanced approach that preserves the rights of the wronged, takes into account the humanitarian conditions of prisoners, and at the same time safeguards the dignity of the military institution while preserving security and stability. True justice cannot be selective; it must be comprehensive and balanced—protecting the nation, preserving human dignity, and safeguarding state institutions. Lebanon today needs a strong state, genuine transparency, and responsible decisions that lead to peace and restore hope to the Lebanese people. This is what we are working for.

Fouad Makhzoumi

163,919 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

The Iran war has exposed a widening fault line at the heart of the Gulf. Once close partners, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are now competing for economic dominance, regional influence and control of vital trade routes. From Yemen and Socotra to Sudan and Somaliland, the two powers are pursuing fundamentally different strategies. Riyadh largely backs recognised governments, while Abu Dhabi has built networks of armed non-state actors and strategic footholds across the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa. Their opposing relationships with Israel, Pakistan and the United States are pushing them further apart. In this video, Gulf security experts Dr Andreas Krieg And Dr. Cinzia Bianco explain how the war has shattered confidence in the US-led regional order, accelerated the Saudi–Emirati rivalry and raised new questions about nuclear proliferation, military alliances and the future balance of power. Can the Gulf monarchies overcome their differences, or are these prisoners of geography heading towards a permanent strategic divide?

The Iran war has exposed a widening fault line at the heart of the Gulf. Once close partners, Saudi Arabia and the UAE are now competing for economic dominance, regional influence and control of vital trade routes. From Yemen and Socotra to Sudan and Somaliland, the two powers are pursuing fundamentally different strategies. Riyadh largely backs recognised governments, while Abu Dhabi has built networks of armed non-state actors and strategic footholds across the Red Sea and the Horn of Africa. Their opposing relationships with Israel, Pakistan and the United States are pushing them further apart. In this video, Gulf security experts Dr Andreas Krieg And Dr. Cinzia Bianco explain how the war has shattered confidence in the US-led regional order, accelerated the Saudi–Emirati rivalry and raised new questions about nuclear proliferation, military alliances and the future balance of power. Can the Gulf monarchies overcome their differences, or are these prisoners of geography heading towards a permanent strategic divide?

Dr Andreas Krieg

18,380 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

⚡️Sheikh Dr.Al-Sadiq Al-Ghariani, the Grand Mufti of Libya: “What the UAE is doing now in Sudan is an implementation of the Zionist project. What is happening in Sudan, what is happening in Libya, (through the Saudi & UAE’s support for Haftar’s militia that occupies eastern Libya) and what happened before in Yemen, and in Egypt with the coup that brought its ruler (Sisi) to power through militarization, and what happened in Iraq, are all part of one scheme, a single Zionist-American plan. The project in the West Bank and Gaza is the core, and its branches have extended to Yemen, Egypt, Libya, and Sudan. When Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia were liberated for a few months in 2012, the Arab and Muslim armies, and weapons of the Muslims, were in Gaza and the West Bank. The American-Zionist enemy felt threatened. That’s why they plotted: their war on Yemen, the coup in Egypt against the elected president (Morsi) because he opened the crossings with Gaza, and in Libya, they brought us Haftar.”

⚡️Sheikh Dr.Al-Sadiq Al-Ghariani, the Grand Mufti of Libya: “What the UAE is doing now in Sudan is an implementation of the Zionist project. What is happening in Sudan, what is happening in Libya, (through the Saudi & UAE’s support for Haftar’s militia that occupies eastern Libya) and what happened before in Yemen, and in Egypt with the coup that brought its ruler (Sisi) to power through militarization, and what happened in Iraq, are all part of one scheme, a single Zionist-American plan. The project in the West Bank and Gaza is the core, and its branches have extended to Yemen, Egypt, Libya, and Sudan. When Egypt, Libya, and Tunisia were liberated for a few months in 2012, the Arab and Muslim armies, and weapons of the Muslims, were in Gaza and the West Bank. The American-Zionist enemy felt threatened. That’s why they plotted: their war on Yemen, the coup in Egypt against the elected president (Morsi) because he opened the crossings with Gaza, and in Libya, they brought us Haftar.”

Warfare Analysis

151,971 просмотров • 1 год назад

Al-Harith Idriss Exposes UAE’s Role in Fueling War and Atrocities in Sudan Before the UN Security Council In a powerful and unprecedented right of reply before the United Nations Security Council, Sudan’s Permanent Representative, Ambassador Al-Harith Idriss, directly accused the United Arab Emirates of waging a proxy war against Sudan through its sponsorship of the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). His address came as a firm rebuttal to the statement made earlier by the UAE’s representative and laid bare the full extent of Abu Dhabi’s involvement in arming, funding, and coordinating attacks that have led to mass killings across Sudan, particularly in El Fasher. Al-Harith Idriss began his reply with a sharp assertion: “There is no civil war in Sudan. It is a war and aggression waged by the UAE through its regional proxy, the Rapid Support Militia.” He emphasized that attempts to frame the conflict as an internal power struggle between two sides are a deliberate distortion meant to conceal external aggression. The ambassador expressed astonishment that “a representative of a state whose hands are stained with the blood of innocents in Sudan” could address the Security Council as if speaking on behalf of peace and stability. “Hearing that representative talk about Sudan as though it were under Abu Dhabi’s guardianship is an insult to this Council and a mockery of the blood of the children, women, and orphans killed daily with Emirati money and weapons,” he said. Citing investigative reports by The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, and Yale University’s Humanitarian Research Lab, Idriss detailed the UAE’s direct coordination with the militia. He described a sophisticated network linking military experts in eastern Libya with a satellite command center in Abu Dhabi, responsible for directing operations on Sudanese soil. According to these reports, shipments of weapons, armored vehicle engines, and advanced targeting systems—some manufactured in member states of the Security Council—have been transferred to the militia. Idriss noted that “Libyan television channels confirmed the presence of more than ten military aircraft flying daily between the UAE and eastern Libya between October 25 and 26, just before the militia’s latest assault on El Fasher.” The ambassador also referenced Yale’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which confirmed, through satellite imagery, that mass executions took place between October 26 and 28 at El Fasher’s Saudi Hospital. “All patients and staff were executed in horrific ways by the militia, and doctors and medical workers were abducted,” he said. Al-Harith Idriss condemned the UAE’s actions as “a blatant violation of the UN Charter, the Charter of the Arab League, and this Council’s resolutions, which prohibit support for terrorist and unlawful armed groups.” He questioned the hypocrisy of a state that “speaks of peace in this chamber while filling Sudan’s skies with planes and ammunition sent to those who kill women and children, loot cities, and rape girls.” The ambassador went further, accusing the UAE of attempting to fragment Sudan and control parts of its territory to plunder its resources and gold, warning that such ambitions would fail. “Sudan, which stood by the Emirati people since the founding of their state, will never forget that Abu Dhabi was among the first to betray that goodwill and conspire against Sudan’s unity and stability,” he declared. Defending the honor of the Sudanese Armed Forces, Idriss reminded the Council that Sudanese soldiers fought alongside the Allies and Britain in the battles of Eritrea, Ethiopia, and North Africa during both World Wars. “Is this proud institution now to be replaced by barbaric militias you have condemned this evening?” he asked. He concluded by warning that the UAE will be remembered in Sudan’s collective memory as a symbol of political treachery and moral decay. “The UAE’s representative should have been seated not under this dome, but among the ranks of the criminal militia his country has financed,” he said. Despite the devastation, Idriss reaffirmed the resilience of the Sudanese people, asserting that no money, weapons, or political complicity can break their will. “Sudan has faced colonialism, tyranny, and oppression—and triumphed over them all. Today, it will defeat the Emirati aggression just as it defeated every invader before,” he vowed. Al-Harith Idriss closed with words that echoed across the chamber: “Before this Emirati aggression, Sudan stands with one motto left — the honor of the rifle.” His statement was a reminder that Sudan’s struggle is one of sovereignty, dignity, and survival. #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism

Al-Harith Idriss Exposes UAE’s Role in Fueling War and Atrocities in Sudan Before the UN Security Council In a powerful and unprecedented right of reply before the United Nations Security Council, Sudan’s Permanent Representative, Ambassador Al-Harith Idriss, directly accused the United Arab Emirates of waging a proxy war against Sudan through its sponsorship of the Rapid Support Militia (Janjaweed). His address came as a firm rebuttal to the statement made earlier by the UAE’s representative and laid bare the full extent of Abu Dhabi’s involvement in arming, funding, and coordinating attacks that have led to mass killings across Sudan, particularly in El Fasher. Al-Harith Idriss began his reply with a sharp assertion: “There is no civil war in Sudan. It is a war and aggression waged by the UAE through its regional proxy, the Rapid Support Militia.” He emphasized that attempts to frame the conflict as an internal power struggle between two sides are a deliberate distortion meant to conceal external aggression. The ambassador expressed astonishment that “a representative of a state whose hands are stained with the blood of innocents in Sudan” could address the Security Council as if speaking on behalf of peace and stability. “Hearing that representative talk about Sudan as though it were under Abu Dhabi’s guardianship is an insult to this Council and a mockery of the blood of the children, women, and orphans killed daily with Emirati money and weapons,” he said. Citing investigative reports by The Wall Street Journal, The Guardian, and Yale University’s Humanitarian Research Lab, Idriss detailed the UAE’s direct coordination with the militia. He described a sophisticated network linking military experts in eastern Libya with a satellite command center in Abu Dhabi, responsible for directing operations on Sudanese soil. According to these reports, shipments of weapons, armored vehicle engines, and advanced targeting systems—some manufactured in member states of the Security Council—have been transferred to the militia. Idriss noted that “Libyan television channels confirmed the presence of more than ten military aircraft flying daily between the UAE and eastern Libya between October 25 and 26, just before the militia’s latest assault on El Fasher.” The ambassador also referenced Yale’s Humanitarian Research Lab, which confirmed, through satellite imagery, that mass executions took place between October 26 and 28 at El Fasher’s Saudi Hospital. “All patients and staff were executed in horrific ways by the militia, and doctors and medical workers were abducted,” he said. Al-Harith Idriss condemned the UAE’s actions as “a blatant violation of the UN Charter, the Charter of the Arab League, and this Council’s resolutions, which prohibit support for terrorist and unlawful armed groups.” He questioned the hypocrisy of a state that “speaks of peace in this chamber while filling Sudan’s skies with planes and ammunition sent to those who kill women and children, loot cities, and rape girls.” The ambassador went further, accusing the UAE of attempting to fragment Sudan and control parts of its territory to plunder its resources and gold, warning that such ambitions would fail. “Sudan, which stood by the Emirati people since the founding of their state, will never forget that Abu Dhabi was among the first to betray that goodwill and conspire against Sudan’s unity and stability,” he declared. Defending the honor of the Sudanese Armed Forces, Idriss reminded the Council that Sudanese soldiers fought alongside the Allies and Britain in the battles of Eritrea, Ethiopia, and North Africa during both World Wars. “Is this proud institution now to be replaced by barbaric militias you have condemned this evening?” he asked. He concluded by warning that the UAE will be remembered in Sudan’s collective memory as a symbol of political treachery and moral decay. “The UAE’s representative should have been seated not under this dome, but among the ranks of the criminal militia his country has financed,” he said. Despite the devastation, Idriss reaffirmed the resilience of the Sudanese people, asserting that no money, weapons, or political complicity can break their will. “Sudan has faced colonialism, tyranny, and oppression—and triumphed over them all. Today, it will defeat the Emirati aggression just as it defeated every invader before,” he vowed. Al-Harith Idriss closed with words that echoed across the chamber: “Before this Emirati aggression, Sudan stands with one motto left — the honor of the rifle.” His statement was a reminder that Sudan’s struggle is one of sovereignty, dignity, and survival. #Sudan #RSFisTerroristOrganization #UAEKillsSudanesePeople #UAESponsorsTerrorism

Sudanese Echo

28,412 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇸🇦🇾🇪 Saudi Arabia is running out of time in Yemen Malcolm Nance thinks Saudi Arabia is approaching a decision it can no longer avoid. Either it goes back into Yemen in force, or it accepts that Ansar Allah may soon control the country and, with it, Saudi Arabia’s western oil route. Taiz is what makes this urgent. Malcolm says Ansar Allah’s advance threatens to encircle the remaining Saudi-backed forces there. If they collapse, he expects tribes aligned with the PLC to begin cutting deals with the Houthis simply to survive. “If the Saudis don't act very soon and very quickly, the Houthis will control all of Yemen.” And once that happens, he thinks the strategic problem becomes vastly harder to reverse. Saudi Arabia already faces Iranian pressure on the Persian Gulf side of its energy exports. A Houthi-controlled Yemen would give an Iranian-aligned force enormous leverage over the other route through Bab el-Mandeb. For Nance, that transforms Yemen from a neighboring civil war into a threat to the economic independence of the Saudi state. “The nation state of Saudi Arabia now cannot have a national export of its national resources without kissing the Ring of Iran and the Houthis.” Saudi Arabia would have to stop treating this as another air campaign and mobilize for a real ground war, potentially bringing in Egyptian forces and outside advisers while committing its own armor and troops deep into Yemen. The Saudis and Emiratis already tried war there once and failed. But Nance thinks the alternative is now worse. “This is an existential crisis for the economy of Saudi Arabia. Existential.” Because if Ansar Allah consolidates Yemen, Riyadh may discover that losing the war was only the beginning. It could lose control over how its own oil reaches the world. Malcolm Nance

🇸🇦🇾🇪 Saudi Arabia is running out of time in Yemen Malcolm Nance thinks Saudi Arabia is approaching a decision it can no longer avoid. Either it goes back into Yemen in force, or it accepts that Ansar Allah may soon control the country and, with it, Saudi Arabia’s western oil route. Taiz is what makes this urgent. Malcolm says Ansar Allah’s advance threatens to encircle the remaining Saudi-backed forces there. If they collapse, he expects tribes aligned with the PLC to begin cutting deals with the Houthis simply to survive. “If the Saudis don't act very soon and very quickly, the Houthis will control all of Yemen.” And once that happens, he thinks the strategic problem becomes vastly harder to reverse. Saudi Arabia already faces Iranian pressure on the Persian Gulf side of its energy exports. A Houthi-controlled Yemen would give an Iranian-aligned force enormous leverage over the other route through Bab el-Mandeb. For Nance, that transforms Yemen from a neighboring civil war into a threat to the economic independence of the Saudi state. “The nation state of Saudi Arabia now cannot have a national export of its national resources without kissing the Ring of Iran and the Houthis.” Saudi Arabia would have to stop treating this as another air campaign and mobilize for a real ground war, potentially bringing in Egyptian forces and outside advisers while committing its own armor and troops deep into Yemen. The Saudis and Emiratis already tried war there once and failed. But Nance thinks the alternative is now worse. “This is an existential crisis for the economy of Saudi Arabia. Existential.” Because if Ansar Allah consolidates Yemen, Riyadh may discover that losing the war was only the beginning. It could lose control over how its own oil reaches the world. Malcolm Nance

Mario Nawfal

279,698 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

🇹🇷 🤝🇸🇴Efforts to externally divide Somalia are moving in clear opposition to the social and political realities on the ground. The clashes that previously occurred in Las Anod did not bring stability to the former administration. Instead, they resulted in governance weaknesses, a loss of legitimacy, and political failure. Continuing a similar discourse today in Hargeisa would amount to nothing more than repeating the same mistake. Las Anod’s decision to separate from Somaliland and declare its affiliation with the Federal Republic of Somalia is not merely a local decision. It constitutes a strategic response by the Somali people in favor of unity rather than fragmentation. Similar messages emerging from Awdal further demonstrate that this trend is structural rather than temporary. While external actors seeking to fragment Somalia remain active, the emergence of a strong willingness among significant segments of the Somali population to integrate into the central federal structure is noteworthy. What we are witnessing in Somalia today is the reversal of the classic “divide-and-rule” approach: divide, fragment, and reunify. In this context, the presence of the Somali President and Prime Minister, alongside Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan, standing with the Somali people in Las Anod was not merely symbolic. It conveyed a clear message in support of Somalia’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political unity. As it has in the past, Türkiye will continue to stand by the will, unity, and sovereignty of the Somali people.

🇹🇷 🤝🇸🇴Efforts to externally divide Somalia are moving in clear opposition to the social and political realities on the ground. The clashes that previously occurred in Las Anod did not bring stability to the former administration. Instead, they resulted in governance weaknesses, a loss of legitimacy, and political failure. Continuing a similar discourse today in Hargeisa would amount to nothing more than repeating the same mistake. Las Anod’s decision to separate from Somaliland and declare its affiliation with the Federal Republic of Somalia is not merely a local decision. It constitutes a strategic response by the Somali people in favor of unity rather than fragmentation. Similar messages emerging from Awdal further demonstrate that this trend is structural rather than temporary. While external actors seeking to fragment Somalia remain active, the emergence of a strong willingness among significant segments of the Somali population to integrate into the central federal structure is noteworthy. What we are witnessing in Somalia today is the reversal of the classic “divide-and-rule” approach: divide, fragment, and reunify. In this context, the presence of the Somali President and Prime Minister, alongside Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan, standing with the Somali people in Las Anod was not merely symbolic. It conveyed a clear message in support of Somalia’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and political unity. As it has in the past, Türkiye will continue to stand by the will, unity, and sovereignty of the Somali people.

Tunç Demirtaş

22,938 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

⚡️Mohammed Al-Bukhaiti, member of the political bureau of Ansar Allah (Houthis): TARGETING GULF OIL AND GAS FACILITIES IS A TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC INTEREST FOR ALL SONS OF THE ARAB AND ISLAMIC UMMAH. “All the calamities that have befallen the ummah originated from the Gulf states and were funded by them. The American occupation of Afghanistan started from the Gulf and was funded by them, and the same applies to the American occupation of Iraq, as well as the aggression against Yemen and the siege and starvation of its people, which started from the Gulf and was funded by them. Were it not for the money of the Gulf states, the genocide in Gaza would not have lasted this long. Likewise, the strife that afflicted the ummah was caused by Gulf money, whether in Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Chechnya, or in India between Muslims and Hindus, which weakened the ummah in confronting the Zionist and American enemy. Therefore, the damage inflicted on the ummah as a result of oil money in the Gulf states has been far greater than that of oil money in the state of Texas. Accordingly, targeting Gulf oil and gas facilities represents a tactical and strategic interest for all sons of the Arab and Islamic ummah.”

⚡️Mohammed Al-Bukhaiti, member of the political bureau of Ansar Allah (Houthis): TARGETING GULF OIL AND GAS FACILITIES IS A TACTICAL AND STRATEGIC INTEREST FOR ALL SONS OF THE ARAB AND ISLAMIC UMMAH. “All the calamities that have befallen the ummah originated from the Gulf states and were funded by them. The American occupation of Afghanistan started from the Gulf and was funded by them, and the same applies to the American occupation of Iraq, as well as the aggression against Yemen and the siege and starvation of its people, which started from the Gulf and was funded by them. Were it not for the money of the Gulf states, the genocide in Gaza would not have lasted this long. Likewise, the strife that afflicted the ummah was caused by Gulf money, whether in Afghanistan, Algeria, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Sudan, Chechnya, or in India between Muslims and Hindus, which weakened the ummah in confronting the Zionist and American enemy. Therefore, the damage inflicted on the ummah as a result of oil money in the Gulf states has been far greater than that of oil money in the state of Texas. Accordingly, targeting Gulf oil and gas facilities represents a tactical and strategic interest for all sons of the Arab and Islamic ummah.”

Warfare Analysis

13,991 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Mercenaries are fighting each other. Forces linked to the UAE in Al-Daleh have arrested members of the security detail of the Minister of Defense of the Yemeni government, which is supported by Saudi Arabia, and set fire to vehicles belonging to his convoy. Local reports confirm that armed southern factions blocked roads and surrounded the minister's convoy amid escalating tensions in Al-Daleh. Factions supported by Saudi Arabia and the UAE are now turning against each other

Mercenaries are fighting each other. Forces linked to the UAE in Al-Daleh have arrested members of the security detail of the Minister of Defense of the Yemeni government, which is supported by Saudi Arabia, and set fire to vehicles belonging to his convoy. Local reports confirm that armed southern factions blocked roads and surrounded the minister's convoy amid escalating tensions in Al-Daleh. Factions supported by Saudi Arabia and the UAE are now turning against each other

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

15,383 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Despite the defeat and dissolution of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) after Saudi Arabia's 🇸🇦 offensive, South Yemen 🇾🇪 civilians continue to protest. The STC was the UAE 🇦🇪 backed militia that was controling part of South Yemen and launched a large offensive that nearly managed to merge the pro-saudi internationnaly recognized Yemen and the STC into a single state in late december 2025. Since Yemen is already cut between the north (Houthis rebels, shia muslim) and the south/east (STC, gov., sunni muslim), part of the southern population wanted to revive South Yemen/South Arabia state., which was already independant between 1967 and 1990. When the STC launched its offensive, it didn't face any large resistance and was welcomed by part of the population. However, the situation quickly reversed when Saudi Arabia and Yemen's army intervened and destroyed in a few days the dreams of independence of the pro-UAE STC. However, the population continues to widely protest in most of South Yemen's cities, calling for independence. For now, this is not the KSA's priority since it would prefer a unified state to two Yemeni states at its southern border. A pro-Iran and pro-Emirati state at its southern border would have been a nightmare for Riyadh...

Despite the defeat and dissolution of the Southern Transitional Council (STC) after Saudi Arabia's 🇸🇦 offensive, South Yemen 🇾🇪 civilians continue to protest. The STC was the UAE 🇦🇪 backed militia that was controling part of South Yemen and launched a large offensive that nearly managed to merge the pro-saudi internationnaly recognized Yemen and the STC into a single state in late december 2025. Since Yemen is already cut between the north (Houthis rebels, shia muslim) and the south/east (STC, gov., sunni muslim), part of the southern population wanted to revive South Yemen/South Arabia state., which was already independant between 1967 and 1990. When the STC launched its offensive, it didn't face any large resistance and was welcomed by part of the population. However, the situation quickly reversed when Saudi Arabia and Yemen's army intervened and destroyed in a few days the dreams of independence of the pro-UAE STC. However, the population continues to widely protest in most of South Yemen's cities, calling for independence. For now, this is not the KSA's priority since it would prefer a unified state to two Yemeni states at its southern border. A pro-Iran and pro-Emirati state at its southern border would have been a nightmare for Riyadh...

Clément Molin

13,091 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Today, I had the honor of meeting with His Excellency President General Joseph Aoun at a decisive moment for Lebanon. We reviewed the latest developments following the framework announced in Washington on June 26 and discussed the historic opportunity now before Lebanon to restore its sovereignty, strengthen its state institutions, and reclaim its national decision-making. I reaffirmed my full support for this process because, for the first time, it provides a practical and internationally backed framework capable of returning the exclusive authority over war and peace to the Lebanese state, ending Lebanon’s role as a battleground for regional conflicts, and putting an end to all forms of foreign interference in our national affairs—particularly Iranian interference, which has undermined Lebanon’s sovereignty and drawn our country into conflicts that do not serve its national interests. I also reiterated my full support for President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Dr. Nawaf Salam, and the Government. Success will require a unified national position behind the constitutional institutions of the Lebanese state and a shared determination not to lose this historic opportunity. We believe the Washington framework represents a historic political and security roadmap toward a just, lasting, and internationally supported peace between Lebanon and Israel. It builds on previous agreements, particularly the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement of November 27, 2024, while introducing the political and implementation mechanisms necessary to fulfill the commitments already undertaken by the Lebanese state. Its ultimate objective is to restore the state’s exclusive authority throughout Lebanese territory, place all weapons under the sole authority of the state, and fully reestablish Lebanon’s sovereignty. It is important to recall that the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement was approved by the Government of Prime Minister Najib Mikati on behalf of the Lebanese Republic. That government rested politically and parliamentarily on the support of Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and their allies. The framework announced in Washington does not replace those commitments; it provides the mechanisms necessary to implement them. Those who accepted these obligations yesterday cannot reject their implementation today. Respect for the continuity of the Lebanese state and its international commitments is not a political preference—it is a constitutional and national obligation. Any retreat would undermine Lebanon’s credibility and weaken its standing with both its Arab partners and the international community. Lebanon has no realistic alternative to this path. We either restore our sovereignty, rebuild confidence with the Arab world and the international community, and secure a future of stability and prosperity, or we remain trapped in conflict, isolation, and economic decline. I also proposed to His Excellency that the Government adopt, alongside the implementation of the agreed security arrangements, a comprehensive national strategy for recovery, reconstruction, and sustainable economic development in every area where the state progressively resumes its responsibilities. As the Lebanese Armed Forces deploy and the state assumes exclusive security authority, reconstruction and development must advance in parallel. Security alone will not be sufficient. The Lebanese state must return with all of its institutions. Homes and infrastructure must be rebuilt, productive investment encouraged, jobs created for young people, and quality education and healthcare restored. Only a visible and effective state presence can rebuild citizens’ confidence and establish lasting stability. Lebanon’s recent history has demonstrated that where the state withdraws, parallel institutions inevitably emerge. The responsibility of the state today is to reclaim that space completely, ensuring that no parallel structures remain and that no authority exists other than the constitutional institutions of the Lebanese Republic. The restoration of the Lebanese state is not simply a political aspiration. It is a comprehensive national project founded on full sovereignty, one state, one army, one legitimate authority over arms, strong institutions, a productive economy, equal justice under the law, and a future worthy of all Lebanese.

Today, I had the honor of meeting with His Excellency President General Joseph Aoun at a decisive moment for Lebanon. We reviewed the latest developments following the framework announced in Washington on June 26 and discussed the historic opportunity now before Lebanon to restore its sovereignty, strengthen its state institutions, and reclaim its national decision-making. I reaffirmed my full support for this process because, for the first time, it provides a practical and internationally backed framework capable of returning the exclusive authority over war and peace to the Lebanese state, ending Lebanon’s role as a battleground for regional conflicts, and putting an end to all forms of foreign interference in our national affairs—particularly Iranian interference, which has undermined Lebanon’s sovereignty and drawn our country into conflicts that do not serve its national interests. I also reiterated my full support for President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Dr. Nawaf Salam, and the Government. Success will require a unified national position behind the constitutional institutions of the Lebanese state and a shared determination not to lose this historic opportunity. We believe the Washington framework represents a historic political and security roadmap toward a just, lasting, and internationally supported peace between Lebanon and Israel. It builds on previous agreements, particularly the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement of November 27, 2024, while introducing the political and implementation mechanisms necessary to fulfill the commitments already undertaken by the Lebanese state. Its ultimate objective is to restore the state’s exclusive authority throughout Lebanese territory, place all weapons under the sole authority of the state, and fully reestablish Lebanon’s sovereignty. It is important to recall that the Cessation of Hostilities Agreement was approved by the Government of Prime Minister Najib Mikati on behalf of the Lebanese Republic. That government rested politically and parliamentarily on the support of Hezbollah, the Amal Movement, and their allies. The framework announced in Washington does not replace those commitments; it provides the mechanisms necessary to implement them. Those who accepted these obligations yesterday cannot reject their implementation today. Respect for the continuity of the Lebanese state and its international commitments is not a political preference—it is a constitutional and national obligation. Any retreat would undermine Lebanon’s credibility and weaken its standing with both its Arab partners and the international community. Lebanon has no realistic alternative to this path. We either restore our sovereignty, rebuild confidence with the Arab world and the international community, and secure a future of stability and prosperity, or we remain trapped in conflict, isolation, and economic decline. I also proposed to His Excellency that the Government adopt, alongside the implementation of the agreed security arrangements, a comprehensive national strategy for recovery, reconstruction, and sustainable economic development in every area where the state progressively resumes its responsibilities. As the Lebanese Armed Forces deploy and the state assumes exclusive security authority, reconstruction and development must advance in parallel. Security alone will not be sufficient. The Lebanese state must return with all of its institutions. Homes and infrastructure must be rebuilt, productive investment encouraged, jobs created for young people, and quality education and healthcare restored. Only a visible and effective state presence can rebuild citizens’ confidence and establish lasting stability. Lebanon’s recent history has demonstrated that where the state withdraws, parallel institutions inevitably emerge. The responsibility of the state today is to reclaim that space completely, ensuring that no parallel structures remain and that no authority exists other than the constitutional institutions of the Lebanese Republic. The restoration of the Lebanese state is not simply a political aspiration. It is a comprehensive national project founded on full sovereignty, one state, one army, one legitimate authority over arms, strong institutions, a productive economy, equal justice under the law, and a future worthy of all Lebanese.

Fouad Makhzoumi

135,587 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

President Ahmad Al-Sharaa in an Interview with Al Jazeera. Saudi Arabia and Türkiye mediated last year to secure the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Syria. Lifting economic sanctions will not be sufficient unless Syria is also removed from the U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Syria is an important country with a strategic location and has been the focus of global attention throughout history. The policies of the former regime led to Syria's isolation from the rest of the world. We have significant interests with Russia, which was quick to open a new chapter in its relations with us. There are major economic and commercial interests between Syria and Western countries, which also host large numbers of Syrian refugees. What affects Lebanon affects Syria, as the two countries are linked by strategic interests. We are discussing solutions with the Lebanese government that will help lead Lebanon to safety and stability. Any state of chaos in Lebanon will have a direct impact on Syria. We support the Lebanese state's exclusive control over weapons and its sole authority over decisions of war and peace. Hezbollah took part alongside the former regime in its war against the Syrian people and was responsible for the displacement of millions of Syrians. Addressing Lebanon's crisis requires more than a security approach; it demands a comprehensive solution that addresses all dimensions of the crisis. The Syrian state is working to enable the Lebanese state to fulfill the commitments it has undertaken. We support the Lebanese state in strengthening its executive institutions and implementing the Taif Agreement as a comprehensive framework for Lebanon. We have no intention of carrying out any military intervention in Lebanon. The agreement between Lebanon and Israel contains many loopholes. The Arab region should have its own independent policy, free from the influence of Israeli or Iranian policies. We are working toward reaching a security agreement with Israel with the participation of a group of countries. We seek to avoid any confrontation with Israel, as it is not in our interest. If the security agreement with Israel succeeds, it will pave the way for comprehensive peace without compromising Syria's rightful claim to the occupied Golan Heights. The future of relations with Israel depends on the proper implementation of each stage of the agreement. We support the Arab path toward the establishment of a Palestinian state. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had significant involvement in Syria and believes it has a legitimate role in the countries of the region. We are concerned about the expansion of the war in the region and the regional consequences that may result. Over the past year and a half, Syria has sought to avoid becoming involved in any conflict in the region. Relations with the Republic of Iraq continue to improve. We are taking measures to address any potential threats from armed factions along our border with Iraq. A mentality of revenge does not build nations, and our policy is clearly focused on reconstruction and stability. Our foreign policy is based on credibility, strengthening trust with all parties. Syria was once a destination for the Gulf states and enjoyed strong relations and shared interests with them. Investments are already underway on the ground, but they will require time before their impact becomes visible. We are committed to ensuring the success of Gulf and international investments in Syria. Gulf investments in Syria are concentrated in the energy sector, airports, real estate, and urban development. The former regime ran the drug trade in Syria and spread corruption across all sectors. The Syrian economy is expected to grow, and its results will become evident over time. From the very first moment of Syria's liberation, we began building state institutions. We are not able to solve all problems at once, and reforming state institutions requires time. We established an authority to manage the missing persons file in accordance with international standards and in cooperation with countries that have relevant expertise. The state operates according to laws and regulations in pursuit of justice. The SDF is an organization that emerged under specific circumstances and bore arms; it is not linked to the Kurdish community. The positive effects of the course Syria has followed over the past year and a half are beginning to emerge.

President Ahmad Al-Sharaa in an Interview with Al Jazeera. Saudi Arabia and Türkiye mediated last year to secure the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Syria. Lifting economic sanctions will not be sufficient unless Syria is also removed from the U.S. list of State Sponsors of Terrorism. Syria is an important country with a strategic location and has been the focus of global attention throughout history. The policies of the former regime led to Syria's isolation from the rest of the world. We have significant interests with Russia, which was quick to open a new chapter in its relations with us. There are major economic and commercial interests between Syria and Western countries, which also host large numbers of Syrian refugees. What affects Lebanon affects Syria, as the two countries are linked by strategic interests. We are discussing solutions with the Lebanese government that will help lead Lebanon to safety and stability. Any state of chaos in Lebanon will have a direct impact on Syria. We support the Lebanese state's exclusive control over weapons and its sole authority over decisions of war and peace. Hezbollah took part alongside the former regime in its war against the Syrian people and was responsible for the displacement of millions of Syrians. Addressing Lebanon's crisis requires more than a security approach; it demands a comprehensive solution that addresses all dimensions of the crisis. The Syrian state is working to enable the Lebanese state to fulfill the commitments it has undertaken. We support the Lebanese state in strengthening its executive institutions and implementing the Taif Agreement as a comprehensive framework for Lebanon. We have no intention of carrying out any military intervention in Lebanon. The agreement between Lebanon and Israel contains many loopholes. The Arab region should have its own independent policy, free from the influence of Israeli or Iranian policies. We are working toward reaching a security agreement with Israel with the participation of a group of countries. We seek to avoid any confrontation with Israel, as it is not in our interest. If the security agreement with Israel succeeds, it will pave the way for comprehensive peace without compromising Syria's rightful claim to the occupied Golan Heights. The future of relations with Israel depends on the proper implementation of each stage of the agreement. We support the Arab path toward the establishment of a Palestinian state. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps had significant involvement in Syria and believes it has a legitimate role in the countries of the region. We are concerned about the expansion of the war in the region and the regional consequences that may result. Over the past year and a half, Syria has sought to avoid becoming involved in any conflict in the region. Relations with the Republic of Iraq continue to improve. We are taking measures to address any potential threats from armed factions along our border with Iraq. A mentality of revenge does not build nations, and our policy is clearly focused on reconstruction and stability. Our foreign policy is based on credibility, strengthening trust with all parties. Syria was once a destination for the Gulf states and enjoyed strong relations and shared interests with them. Investments are already underway on the ground, but they will require time before their impact becomes visible. We are committed to ensuring the success of Gulf and international investments in Syria. Gulf investments in Syria are concentrated in the energy sector, airports, real estate, and urban development. The former regime ran the drug trade in Syria and spread corruption across all sectors. The Syrian economy is expected to grow, and its results will become evident over time. From the very first moment of Syria's liberation, we began building state institutions. We are not able to solve all problems at once, and reforming state institutions requires time. We established an authority to manage the missing persons file in accordance with international standards and in cooperation with countries that have relevant expertise. The state operates according to laws and regulations in pursuit of justice. The SDF is an organization that emerged under specific circumstances and bore arms; it is not linked to the Kurdish community. The positive effects of the course Syria has followed over the past year and a half are beginning to emerge.

Qusay Noor

12,221 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

#Ethiopian Foreign Minister: #Ethiopia’s State Formation Still Disputed, and is shaped by a Culture of Violence The following is what the current Ethiopian Foreign Minister said about the flawed nature of Ethiopia’s state formation and how it is still contested and shaped by a violent political culture. This is verbatim; I have not added any opinion. 'The process through which the Ethiopian state was formed is rather unique on the African continent. In most parts of the world, states are formed through conflict, violence, and bloodshed. That does not make Ethiopia unique. What makes Ethiopia unique—particularly in the African context—is that the violence was carried out by indigenous, native forces. The main protagonists in this process were Ethiopians themselves. By contrast, in the history of most African countries, state formation was the outcome of colonial conquest, with significant involvement of European actors. So, we have a state formation process driven by local political forces, but we did not have the opportunity to strengthen or cement that process through a social contract, nor did we have the chance to heal the wounds and contradictions that emerged during state formation. As a result, the legitimacy of the state was questioned and contested by some. This contestation has persisted throughout the formation of the state and has been exacerbated by subsequent events. Some have challenged the very legitimacy of the Ethiopian state; others have contested its nature, its vision, its identity, and its narratives. Some have found it difficult to accept its institutions and their configurations. Thus, there have always been fundamental contradictions stemming from Ethiopia’s state formation process, and we have not adequately addressed them in a way that would create consensus among key actors. Another layer we need to consider is that we have a very violent and autocratic political culture. Whenever there are contests for power, political differences, or disagreements over policy or institutional arrangements, the method of resolving them has more often than not been conflict. Imposing one’s will and vision on others through violence and force has been how we have conducted politics for generations. And once in power, using autocratic means to consolidate authority has been common practice. This autocratic and forceful approach, combined with the flawed state formation process, has produced many wounds, grievances, and violations. We have not been able to address these in a way that is satisfactory to most Ethiopians. On top of this, attempts to resolve these problems have often been divisive, emphasizing differences at the expense of what unites us. As a result, our politics has become polarized and ethnic-based.

#Ethiopian Foreign Minister: #Ethiopia’s State Formation Still Disputed, and is shaped by a Culture of Violence The following is what the current Ethiopian Foreign Minister said about the flawed nature of Ethiopia’s state formation and how it is still contested and shaped by a violent political culture. This is verbatim; I have not added any opinion. 'The process through which the Ethiopian state was formed is rather unique on the African continent. In most parts of the world, states are formed through conflict, violence, and bloodshed. That does not make Ethiopia unique. What makes Ethiopia unique—particularly in the African context—is that the violence was carried out by indigenous, native forces. The main protagonists in this process were Ethiopians themselves. By contrast, in the history of most African countries, state formation was the outcome of colonial conquest, with significant involvement of European actors. So, we have a state formation process driven by local political forces, but we did not have the opportunity to strengthen or cement that process through a social contract, nor did we have the chance to heal the wounds and contradictions that emerged during state formation. As a result, the legitimacy of the state was questioned and contested by some. This contestation has persisted throughout the formation of the state and has been exacerbated by subsequent events. Some have challenged the very legitimacy of the Ethiopian state; others have contested its nature, its vision, its identity, and its narratives. Some have found it difficult to accept its institutions and their configurations. Thus, there have always been fundamental contradictions stemming from Ethiopia’s state formation process, and we have not adequately addressed them in a way that would create consensus among key actors. Another layer we need to consider is that we have a very violent and autocratic political culture. Whenever there are contests for power, political differences, or disagreements over policy or institutional arrangements, the method of resolving them has more often than not been conflict. Imposing one’s will and vision on others through violence and force has been how we have conducted politics for generations. And once in power, using autocratic means to consolidate authority has been common practice. This autocratic and forceful approach, combined with the flawed state formation process, has produced many wounds, grievances, and violations. We have not been able to address these in a way that is satisfactory to most Ethiopians. On top of this, attempts to resolve these problems have often been divisive, emphasizing differences at the expense of what unites us. As a result, our politics has become polarized and ethnic-based.

Sirak Bahlbi

20,242 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Listen to this! Aside from the fact that this man is accused of pedophilia and leaked emails between him and Epstein have surfaced, which honestly doesn’t surprise me, he claims they invested in “the safe country of Somaliland,” yet he never mentions the other ports in Somalia that the UAE controls under the pretext of investment, including Bosaso, one of the most important and strategic ports in the country, located on the Gulf of Aden and near the Red Sea. So does anyone still doubt that the UAE is deliberately blocking every port it controls in Somalia in order to boost Berbera?

Listen to this! Aside from the fact that this man is accused of pedophilia and leaked emails between him and Epstein have surfaced, which honestly doesn’t surprise me, he claims they invested in “the safe country of Somaliland,” yet he never mentions the other ports in Somalia that the UAE controls under the pretext of investment, including Bosaso, one of the most important and strategic ports in the country, located on the Gulf of Aden and near the Red Sea. So does anyone still doubt that the UAE is deliberately blocking every port it controls in Somalia in order to boost Berbera?

Deeqa 🇸🇴

14,197 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇸🇩 For years, the UAE has worked to shut down or bury UN scrutiny of its role in Sudan and other wars and atrocities, much of it while Emirati Minister of State Lana Nusseibeh, now a candidate for UN secretary-general, served as its UN ambassador (2013-2024). The New York Times laid out the following record: ➤ Sudan, July 2026: The UN Panel of Experts on Sudan, which monitors the arms embargo on Darfur, told the Security Council that "the U.A.E. supported the R.S.F. by providing mercenaries," Colombians trained at two military bases in Abu Dhabi. The report was never published. Bahrain, which holds a seat on the Council, blocked it, and a senior UN official and a regional diplomat told The Times that Bahrain acted at the UAE's request. ➤ Sudan, last week: The same panel sent the Council a new confidential report naming Global Security Services Group, an Abu Dhabi firm, as the company that hired the Colombian mercenaries, known as the "Desert Wolves,” confirming press reports including from the FT. The panel says the firm has close political, business and family ties to the Emirati ruling family. The Times and FT have reported it was founded by a senior official in the UAE presidency, and the firm calls itself "a preferred security provider" for the Emirati Foreign Ministry and Ministry of Presidential Affairs. The report traces how it moved the fighters into Sudan through territory held by UAE-backed forces in Libya and Somalia. ➤ Yemen, 2021: Saudi Arabia and the UAE successfully lobbied the UN Human Rights Council to shut down its Group of Eminent Experts on Yemen. It was the only international body investigating rights violations in the war, in which Emirati troops were deployed. ➤ Libya, 2016: As UN investigators accused the UAE of arming warlord Khalifa Haftar, an Emirati official wrote to Nusseibeh: "The fact of the matter is that the U.A.E. violated the Security Council resolution on Libya and continues to do so." The email was accidentally sent to the UN, which published it with the writer's name redacted. The Times identifies him as Ahmed al-Qasimi, a diplomat on Nusseibeh's staff. ➤ European Parliament, November 2025: As lawmakers drafted a resolution condemning atrocities in Sudan weeks after the RSF's capture of El Fasher, Nusseibeh led the UAE's push to keep it from implicating Abu Dhabi, Politico reported, personally lobbying members of Parliament. The resolution passed without a single mention of the UAE. The UAE "rejects as unfounded" claims that it influenced any Security Council member and Bahrain did not respond to The New York Times. The UAE sponsors the RSF's genocide and mass rape campaign in Sudan.

🇸🇩 For years, the UAE has worked to shut down or bury UN scrutiny of its role in Sudan and other wars and atrocities, much of it while Emirati Minister of State Lana Nusseibeh, now a candidate for UN secretary-general, served as its UN ambassador (2013-2024). The New York Times laid out the following record: ➤ Sudan, July 2026: The UN Panel of Experts on Sudan, which monitors the arms embargo on Darfur, told the Security Council that "the U.A.E. supported the R.S.F. by providing mercenaries," Colombians trained at two military bases in Abu Dhabi. The report was never published. Bahrain, which holds a seat on the Council, blocked it, and a senior UN official and a regional diplomat told The Times that Bahrain acted at the UAE's request. ➤ Sudan, last week: The same panel sent the Council a new confidential report naming Global Security Services Group, an Abu Dhabi firm, as the company that hired the Colombian mercenaries, known as the "Desert Wolves,” confirming press reports including from the FT. The panel says the firm has close political, business and family ties to the Emirati ruling family. The Times and FT have reported it was founded by a senior official in the UAE presidency, and the firm calls itself "a preferred security provider" for the Emirati Foreign Ministry and Ministry of Presidential Affairs. The report traces how it moved the fighters into Sudan through territory held by UAE-backed forces in Libya and Somalia. ➤ Yemen, 2021: Saudi Arabia and the UAE successfully lobbied the UN Human Rights Council to shut down its Group of Eminent Experts on Yemen. It was the only international body investigating rights violations in the war, in which Emirati troops were deployed. ➤ Libya, 2016: As UN investigators accused the UAE of arming warlord Khalifa Haftar, an Emirati official wrote to Nusseibeh: "The fact of the matter is that the U.A.E. violated the Security Council resolution on Libya and continues to do so." The email was accidentally sent to the UN, which published it with the writer's name redacted. The Times identifies him as Ahmed al-Qasimi, a diplomat on Nusseibeh's staff. ➤ European Parliament, November 2025: As lawmakers drafted a resolution condemning atrocities in Sudan weeks after the RSF's capture of El Fasher, Nusseibeh led the UAE's push to keep it from implicating Abu Dhabi, Politico reported, personally lobbying members of Parliament. The resolution passed without a single mention of the UAE. The UAE "rejects as unfounded" claims that it influenced any Security Council member and Bahrain did not respond to The New York Times. The UAE sponsors the RSF's genocide and mass rape campaign in Sudan.

Drop Site

53,736 просмотров • 4 дней назад

🔴 In a rare and much needed moment of clarity at the Security Council, Cameron Hudson Cameron Hudson presented a fact based, interest driven reading of Sudan’s war. A reading centered on Sudan, civilians, and regional stability, not political alignment. He made explicit what many have avoided saying clearly in formal international forums: “This is not a war between two generals, nor a local crisis. It is a war on the state and society. And if its financiers and perpetrators are not confronted today, Sudan will not be the last stop of this conflict in the region.” Hudson warned that Sudan is facing an existential collapse, with real risks of state fragmentation, mass atrocities, and regional spillover across the Horn of Africa, the Red Sea, and beyond. Hudson was equally explicit about the role of external enablers. He stated that not all actors bear equal responsibility for fueling this war, pointing directly to the #UAE for constructing an extensive military airbridge to arm the RSF through Chad, Libya, CAR, South Sudan, and Somalia’s Puntland. His message was direct; that Ignoring enablers, hiding behind diplomatic ambiguity, and relying on half measures have only prolonged the war. Peace will not come from elite deals alone, but from accountability, confronting external backers, and supporting genuine civilian alternatives. Thank you Mr. Hudson for your advocacy for truth, civilian protection, and regional security. #KeepEyesOnSudan

🔴 In a rare and much needed moment of clarity at the Security Council, Cameron Hudson Cameron Hudson presented a fact based, interest driven reading of Sudan’s war. A reading centered on Sudan, civilians, and regional stability, not political alignment. He made explicit what many have avoided saying clearly in formal international forums: “This is not a war between two generals, nor a local crisis. It is a war on the state and society. And if its financiers and perpetrators are not confronted today, Sudan will not be the last stop of this conflict in the region.” Hudson warned that Sudan is facing an existential collapse, with real risks of state fragmentation, mass atrocities, and regional spillover across the Horn of Africa, the Red Sea, and beyond. Hudson was equally explicit about the role of external enablers. He stated that not all actors bear equal responsibility for fueling this war, pointing directly to the #UAE for constructing an extensive military airbridge to arm the RSF through Chad, Libya, CAR, South Sudan, and Somalia’s Puntland. His message was direct; that Ignoring enablers, hiding behind diplomatic ambiguity, and relying on half measures have only prolonged the war. Peace will not come from elite deals alone, but from accountability, confronting external backers, and supporting genuine civilian alternatives. Thank you Mr. Hudson for your advocacy for truth, civilian protection, and regional security. #KeepEyesOnSudan

Walaa Elsadig

17,120 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад