正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Many scientific problems hinge on finding interpretable formulas that fit data, but neural networks are the outright opposite! Check out our recent work that make neural networks modular and interpretable. If you have interesting datasets at hand, we're happy to collaborate!

62,120 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Ziming Liu 的头像
Ziming Liu3 年前

paper: code:

Ziming Liu 的头像
Ziming Liu3 年前

Symbolic regression (finding symbolic formulas from data) has been quite successful on some examples, but it also fail completely for others. Instead, our goal is structure regression (finding modular structures from data), which can provide visible insights for all cases.

Lei Chen 的头像
Lei Chen3 年前

Interesting work! Is this doable for graph nets? The task would be to locate significant attributed substructures. (I guess such location might be useful to help predesign the library of GSN @mmbronstein )

ExiledInfoHaz 的头像
ExiledInfoHaz3 年前

👀

Mitchell B. Slapik 的头像
Mitchell B. Slapik3 年前

Great work Ziming! Could you explain Figure 14? I was a bit confused by it.

Sam McKenzie 的头像
Sam McKenzie3 年前

We suffer in the seizure forecasting field making interpretable models because the features extracted from neural time series are highly correlated. Any tool to understand why our models work would give important insights as to how the brain changes in the lead up to a seizure.

bobert 的头像
bobert3 年前

I see some resemblance with Group method of data handling (GMDH) .

Zekun Jiang 的头像
Zekun Jiang3 年前

👍👍👋 nice!

Nick 的头像
Nick3 年前

it's a clever idea, great job!

Fred 的头像
Fred3 年前

Can you explain what we are seeing here? Here is my confusion: if you regularize enough, you should see only one layer (either last layer or first layer) activation, the rest is just passing through! Why? Since 1 layer is enough to represent output.

相关视频