Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Marco Polo Relaunches BidenLaptopEmails dot com Searchable Database - - - [Captains are auto generated & may contain slight errors]

114,647 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨 HUNTER BIDEN’S HOLLYWOOD SUGAR DADDY KEVIN MORRIS HUMILIATED IN COURT: FORCED TO PAY $50K TO GARRETT ZIEGLER (MARCO POLO) AFTER FRIVOLOUS SLAPP SUIT OVER AUTHENTIC BIDEN LAPTOP CRUMBLES! 💻☠️👿💊💉 In the august arena of California jurisprudence—where anti-SLAPP statutes (Code Civ. Proc. § 425.16) were forged precisely to shield robust public discourse on matters of presidential accountability from the chilling hand of vexatious litigation—a rare and exquisite reversal has unfolded. Kevin Morris, the Beverly Hills entertainment lawyer and self-described benefactor who funneled millions into Hunter Biden’s orbit amid the laptop controversy, launched a multi-count suit against Garrett Ziegler and Marco Polo. At its core: an unproven 2022 allegation that Ziegler impersonated a Democratic operative to elicit sensitive details about the now-infamous Biden laptop files—the very archive forensically authenticated by multiple independent examiners and later central to congressional oversight. The claims? They evaporated under evidentiary scrutiny. No link. No proof. Just Morris’s own incendiary texts boasting he would “take all your money,” “know where you live,” and other locker-room bravado that courts rightly viewed as the aggressor’s own words, not the victim’s. Following the California Court of Appeals’ surgical pruning of the complaint (affirmed in substantial part, with the civil harassment claim definitively excised) and the California Supreme Court’s denial of review (S293105), the Superior Court of Los Angeles has now ordered Morris to remit $50,000 toward Ziegler/Marco Polo’s legal defense costs. A partial victory, yes—but a principled one that underscores a deeper truth: lawfare deployed to muzzle truth-tellers on issues of public import ultimately subsidizes the very transparency it seeks to suppress. Ziegler’s Marco Polo database endures as a meticulous public service, not a crime. The First Amendment does not bend to Hollywood wallets or political dynasties. This is rule-of-law poetry: the powerful, having weaponized the courts, now foot the bill for their overreach. The laptop was real. The questions it raised remain urgent. And now, the invoice has arrived. Full judgment PDF (post-CA Supreme denial): Court of Appeal decision: Here are the primary links to Garrett Ziegler's Marco Polo database and related Biden laptop archives: Main Hub & Report Marco Polo Substack (current home for the organization, reports, and updates): This is the active platform where they publish investigations, including extensive Biden-related material. Full "Report on the Biden Laptop" (the 600+ page dossier detailing alleged crimes, with links to source material): (Includes a downloadable high-res PDF.) Marco Polo's work includes searchable archives of ~128,000 emails, thousands of photos, texts, and other files from the laptop (forensically authenticated by independent experts). Much of the raw database material is embedded or linked within the main report and Substack posts for public/OSINT access. Note: Due to legal controversies and platform policies, some direct raw file hosts have shifted over time— the Substack and report serve as the centralized, maintained access points. For the latest, follow Marco Polo on X. #BidenLaptop #KevinMorrisSLAPPed #GarrettZieglerWins #LawfareBackfire #MarcoPolo #TwoTierJustice #SLAPPAbuse #AccountabilityNow #HunterBidenLaptop

Tony Seruga

33,053 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Marco Polo, our nonprofit research group, released the Report on the Biden Laptop. The infamous device, contains, at the very least, 459 violations of state & federal laws & regulations. Our motives & budget for writing the report were clear, and thousands of Americans financed its production. The Report is simple, but dense: 640 plus pages, 2,020 footnotes. It's broken up neatly into 7 sections with the biggest section, the most important section, being Business-Related Crimes. We believe it's the deepest digital colonoscopy ever performed on a sitting U.S. First Family. And it's FREE to read on our website: BIDENCRIMES dot INFO. So as a result of this Report, and our free repositories of the data, from the abandoned device, namely BidenLaptopEmails dot com and BidenLaptopMedia dot com, the American First Family & their degenerate benefactors have waged a vicious lawfare campaign against us. The lawyers for the pResident's son have sent letters to at least 5 different government agencies, demanding that we be criminally prosecuted, for simply publishing the authentic data from the device. These disgusting demands were recently compounded by an egregiously over-broad subpoena, which was issued in the CIVIL lawsuit in Delaware and, more critically, and the reason for THIS update, is 2 SLAPPs [Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation] have been filed against us, in which Marco Polo and myself, Garrett Ziegler are named as defendants. The first, filed in L.A. County Superior Court, is the result of the bankroller of the U.S. First Family, a VERY degenerate but wealthy lawyer named Kevin Morris (Kevin Morris). The case number for that, is #23-SMCV-01418, in the L.A. County Superior Court. The second, just filed yesterday, and again, the reason for the update - is the son of U.S. pResident, Hunter Biden has filed a civil case against us, in the Central District of California - #23-CV-07593, and it alleges ridiculous claims about us hacking his iCloud and other things, that are SO far from the truth, I don't even know where to start. WINSTON & STRAWN should be embarrased of themselves, that they put their name on this. This is slop! But I wanted to thank you first of all, for the over two years of support. We've done exactly what we told you we were going to do with your 'grass roots army', the reason why we've been able to do this, and the reason why we're being sued, is because we're effective! And we're effective, because we're GRASS ROOTS funded. And I just want to thank you SO MUCH, for standing behind us in this lawfare. You can always get updates at MarcoPolo501C3 dot org Godspeed ⚔️

GEORGE NEWS

219,999 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Should the taxpayer still bear the burden of proof in instances where a tax dispute with the Revenue Authority is based in pre-populated & third party data? In my submission before the National Assembly's Finance & Planning Committee on behalf of the Tax Research Centre at Strathmore University, I argue that Finance Bill 2026's proposals seeking to anchor Incomes & Expenses Validation in law will be incomplete if they do not include a proposal for the the Revenue Authority being saddled with the burden of proof in such instances. Here's why: · Finance Bill 2026 proposes to amend Sec75 of the Tax Procedures Act to provide that the Revenue Authority may use technology to pre-populate tax returns on behalf of a person required to submit or lodge a tax return · Finance Bill 2026 further proposes that a person required to submit or lodge a tax return may rely on pre-populated return generated by the Revenue Authority to file their return · Finance Bill 2026 proposes to amend Sec112 to provide that the Cabinet Secretary of the National Treasury may make Regulations for the procedure for the submission or lodging of returns based on pre-populated tax returns generated by the Revenue Authority Here's where the problem is: · In all this, Sec56(1) which provides that "In any proceedings, the burden shall be on the taxpayer to prove that a tax decision is incorrect" remains unchanged · Sec56(1) is predicated on the fact that Kenya has been running on a self-assessment based regime & the data upon which tax disputes emerges was held by the taxpayer · With Incomes & Expenses Validation & the onset of a Dual Assessment regime in Kenya, taxpayers are now exposed not just to errors of judgement & data on their part, but also errors of technology & transmission which are out of their control · Can we really still have the burden of proof lying exclusively with the taxpayer in an environment where tax compliance has shifted from a function of record keeping to one where system integration reliability is now a key factor?

Julians Amboko

296,431 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

🚨 BREAKING: Houston is NOT Flocking Around, No means NO! 🚨 Two MORE Flock surveillance cameras were chopped down yesterday... that’s 4 destroyed in 3 days. Officials are PANICKING while the public floods tip lines with savage replies: “The cameras are succumbing to heat exhaustion.” 😂 What are Flock cameras? They’re not “just license plate readers.” They’re a massive private surveillance network that: - Records every vehicle passing by. - Stores your movements for 30+ days. (or longer) - Combines it with your personal data via their “Nova” platform. - Hands it all to police... and who knows who else... without a warrant. Houston just spent $869,000 on this. Did YOU vote for it? No. Did anyone? No. This is the Surveillance State rolling out in real time: - 4th Amendment? Ignored. - Privacy? Gone. - Your daily movements turned into a searchable database for government and God knows who. If these cameras are so great for “public safety,” why are cities hiding the contracts? When did we consent to being tracked like criminals everywhere we drive? How many more “upgrades” (audio, device tracking, facial recognition) are coming without our knowledge? Who really owns and profits from your location data? The Blade Runners are awake. Houston is showing the rest of America what resistance looks like. Tag your mayor. Tag your city council. Share this everywhere. The surveillance grid only wins if we stay silent. Your taxes are paying for your own enslavement. Defund the spy cams. Reclaim your freedom. Let me know what you think, and SHARE THIS so that others may too! And if you're not already following Noah B. Price... What the heck are you doing?!

Noah B. Price

20,485 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce

A QUICK TECH FIX TO BYPASS THE TEDIOUS MANUAL SEARCH IN SIR DRAFT ROLL–2026 Tired of manually scanning ~1,000 names in the SIR Draft Roll–2026 just to check whether your name exists? Here’s a simple workaround. 🔹 Download the PDF of the SIR–2026 Draft Roll for your Polling Station 🔹 Right-click → Open with the latest version of Google Chrome (Desktop/Laptop only) 🔹 Chrome magically makes the PDF searchable, even though the Spokesperson ECI had rendered it machine non-readable on almost all standard PDF readers, including Adobe. 👉 This means Ctrl + F works in Chrome, sparing you the eye-straining, page-by-page hunt. I am attaching screen recording. Trust me: I spent nearly 15 minutes manually scanning every page of the correct polling booth and still couldn’t find my name. This trick worked instantly. #GyaneshKumar certainly makes life “interesting” for those of us who enjoy pushing technology to its limits 😃 Background (Why this hack is needed): ✅ Since 2023, Election Commission of India has been issuing Electoral Rolls in machine non-readable PDFs. As a result, searching names using Ctrl+F is disabled on most PDF readers. ✅ Shockingly, even EPIC numbers are not searchable in the SIR Draft Roll PDFs, arguably in violation of directions of the #SupremeCourtofIndia, making verification unnecessarily cumbersome. ✅ Searching by EPIC number or personal details on only gives the serial number in the existing Electoral Roll, which may not match the serial number in the SIR Draft Roll–2026, because: Some voters above you may not have submitted enrolment forms, or Their data could not be mapped till now with the 2002–03 SIR database. ✅ Opening the PDF in the latest Chrome (Desktop) solves this problem. ✅ For Indian language rolls (including Hindi), use a Unicode-enabled keyboard such as the Microsoft Indic Language Input Tool or similar. ⚠️ Note: This workaround works on a PC/laptop only. The mobile version of Chrome doesn’t support this yet, maybe a future update will. So, Jagat Prakash Nadda Mallikarjun Kharge Mamata Banerjee M.K.Stalin - தமிழ்நாட்டை தலைகுனிய விடமாட்டேன் Rahul Gandhi Pinarayi Vijayan may also want to run some quick data analytics using this very trick. Incidentally, there are simple and well-established tools through which such electoral roll PDFs can be made fully machine-readable. This is precisely what Nitin Sethi and his team demonstrated while identifying over 14 lakh duplicate voters in #BiharSIR2025. In an era where data analytics, AI, and OCR tools are routine, it is difficult to comprehend why the Election Commission of India continues to insist on issuing non-searchable electoral rolls, by relying on a narrow interpretation of the Kamal Nath judgment (2018) on Electoral Rolls. Transparency, verifiability, and ease of access are core democratic values, not optional conveniences. Purity of electoral rolls must take precedence over individual privacy. After all, the Electoral Roll only has age and address. A democracy survives on one person–one vote, not on opacity disguised as data protection. Free and fair elections are a constitutional imperative and that requires a publicly verifiable Electoral Rolls. 🙏 CEO Uttar Pradesh CEO West Bengal Chief Electoral Officer, Chhattisgarh CEO RAJASTHAN Maneesh Garg IAS Rajdeep ThePrintIndia Chief Electoral Officer Tamil Nadu may also want to have a look.

Sanjeev Gupta

31,201 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce