正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

Marineland whistleblower uncovers plot to euthanize beluga whales The only feasible options, he explained, are U.S. facilities that do not engage in performances or breeding. A former trainer at Marineland, Phil Demers, now a whistleblower, discussed the park's controversial plan to euthanize beluga whales if the government doesn't provide...

15,288 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

[WATCH] THE PRESIDENT WILL NOT RESIGN. When it comes to the President, there is always a distinctive role between him being the President of the party and the state. There are many factors that influence the state in terms of governance and stability. If the President is called upon by some to resign and he keeps quiet it can throw the state into a state of turmoil. I want to make it clear that the officials agreed with the President on his approach, he took us into confidence and explained the factors that led him to make that particular pronouncement. We believe that the President did the right thing in pronouncing in the best interest of South Africa that he will not be resigning. There was nothing in terms of the judgment that warranted the President to resign it was just mere calls made by individuals and political parties that wanted to throw our country into a state of turmoil, uncertainty and anxiety. So it was imperative that he focus on that. It was correct for him to tell the country that from where he is standing there is nothing in the judgement that states he has done any wrongdoing and what he is going to do with the options in front of him and he has made this public. The President will take the Section 89 Report on review based on the outcome of the judgment and the legal advice he has received. There are no daggers out for the President to resign just opportunistic elements. These elements do not know what they want, they want to impeach and want him to resign, they do know what they actually want. The veracity of the report has not been tested in any committee so they don’t have a basis for the President to resign.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

21,983 次观看 • 2 个月前

CAPTAIN PAUL WATSON TO RETURN THIS YEAR TO THE SOUTHERN OCEAN TO STOP THE RETURN OF THE JAPANESE WHALING FLEET Japan has declared war on the whales of the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. The have completed the construction of the 9, 300 ton, 112 meters long factory ship Kangei Maru. There is only one purpose for such a huge fast long range whaling processing ship and that is to hunt and kill whales in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. The Captain Paul Watson Foundation and Neptune’s Pirates have secured a fast long range ship that can allow us to aggressively intervene. Captain Watson will lead the campaign with a courageous crew of veteran Southern Ocean anti-whaling activists. “The Japanese whalers are planning to target endangered Fin whales. We intend to stop them,” says Captain Watson. In an absurd statement Kyodo Senpaku President Hideki Tokoro told a press conference in the western port city of Shimonoseki. “It’s important to protect marine resources, and we are the ones responsible for that, I believe that continuing (whaling) will benefit both Japan and the world.” Protecting whales by killing whales is illogical. It is also illegal. There is a global moratorium on commercial whaling, Fin whales are endangered, and it is unlawful to kill whales in the Southern Ocean Whale Sanctuary. It’s been ten years since Captain Watson confronted the Japanese whalers in the waters of Antarctica. He and his crew are ready for the challenge. Your support is crucial for this mission. Donate now by clicking here:

Captain Paul Watson Foundation 🐋🏴‍☠️

39,346 次观看 • 2 年前

33rd° Freemason Exposes Darkest Secrets 📐 🎩 About Anti-Christ Luciferian Freemasonry On March 23, 2025 the Almost False channel published an interview with Dr. William (Bill) Schnoebelen (Dr. Bill Schnoebelen), a former 33rd degree Freemason who revealed some of the darkest secrets about Freemasonry. On his journey to become a Catholic priest he was guided to become a Freemason, Pagan Druid, Luciferian, Satanist Warlock, Witch High Priest and later a Mormon. The highlights from the interview were as follows: 📐 He explained a requirement to join Freemasonry was that you believe in God, but they do not specify which god. He defined Freemasonry as an Anti-Christ religious brotherhood, yet not a religion as people in other religions would not be able to join. 📐 He made it to the 33rd° and exposed the secret of the 32nd° Sublime Prince of The Royal Secret degree was to protect that child sexualized vampirism (a.k.a. adrenochrome and SRA) allowed for immortality. He mentioned only 1 in 1,000 masons understood that secret and that being involved with Freemasonry often leads to wickedness, perversion and pedophilia. 📐 He mentioned that to become the highest degree in American Freemasonry (the 33rd°) you must be an important person in an industry, politics or entertainment who is nominated or requested to become a 33rd° Freemason. 📐 He mentioned that in Europe Freemasonry has up to 360 degrees and in the Rite of Memphis Misraïm he made it up to the 97th degree out of 99. 📐 He explained that he sold his soul to the Devil in a deal for seven years in order to become a Satanic Priest. The deal was supposed to grant him everything he wanted as long as he served Satan for those 7 years and afterwards he would be dammed to hell. He had to sign his name in blood in a black book and find 7 people to sell their souls to the Devil as part of the deal, which he did. 📐 He explained that Freemasons would meet up at the lodge after hours with a child who they would gang rape until death in the exact spot that the Freemasonic King James Bible would have been placed during regular ritual meeting hours. 📐 He explained Lucifer is the god behind all false religions so people are giving energy to Lucifer when involved with any of them. Equally, every time a Mason would swear their oath, the Devil would get energy from them. 📐 He explained that the Freemasons have tried to kill him numerous times for exposing the secrets of Freemasonry. 📽️ On YouTube: ↙️↙️Read & Share The Full Article↘️↘️ 🔍 "X-Factor Winner Reveals Worldwide Freemasonry Secretly Cloaks It's True Religion: Luciferianism" 💊 💊

Not Op Cue

132,316 次观看 • 1 年前

Andrei Tarkovsky on Ingmar Bergman's Shame (1968): "Let us look at Bergman's Shame. The film doesn't contain a single 'actor's piece' for the performer to 'give away' the director's purpose, to play the conception of the persona, his attitude to it, to assess it in relation to the overall idea; and the latter is entirely hidden within the dynamic of the characters' lives, at one with it. The people in the film are crushed by circumstances; they act only in accordance with their situation, to which they themselves are subordinate; they make no attempt to proffer us any idea, any perspective on what is happening, or to draw any conclusion. All of that is left to the film as a whole, to the director's vision. And how superbly it is accomplished! You cannot say in simple terms who amongst them is good or bad. I could never say that von Sydow is a bad man. They are all partly good and partly bad, each in his own way. No judgements are passed, because there is no hint of tendentiousness in any of the actors, and the circumstances of the film are used by the director to explore the human possibilities which they test, and not for a moment in order to illustrate a thesis. Max von Sydow's character is developed with masterly power. He is a very good man; a musician; kind and sensitive. It turns out that he is a coward. But by no means every bold man is a good human being, and cowards are not always scoundrels. Of course, he is weak and irresolute. His wife is far stronger than he, so much so that she can overcome her fear. The hero lacks that strength. He is tormented by his own weakness, vulnerability, lack of resilience; he tries to hide, to cower in a corner, not to see and not to hear; and he does this like a child, naively and with complete sincerity. But when circumstances nevertheless force him to defend himself, he instantly turns into a scoundrel. He loses all that was best in him; but the drama and absurdity of his situation is that as he is now he becomes necessary to his wife, who, in her turn, looks to him for protection and succour instead of despising him as she always had. When he beats her about the face and says 'Get out!' she goes crawling after him. There is something here of the age-old idea of passive good and active evil; but its expression is immensely complex. At the beginning of the film the hero cannot even kill a chicken, but as soon as he has found a way of defending himself he becomes a cruel cynic. He has something of Hamlet: my view is that the Prince of Denmark perishes not as a result of the duel, when he dies physically, but immediately after the 'rat' scene, when he understands how irreversible are those laws of life which have forced him, a man of humanity and intellect, to act like the inferior people who inhabit Elsinore. Von Sydow is now a sinister character, afraid of nothing: he kills; will not raise a finger to save his fellows; pursues only his own interests. The point is that you have to be a person of great integrity to feel fear in the face of the foul necessity to kill and humiliate. And by shedding that fear and apparently acquiring courage, a person in fact loses his spiritual strength and intellectual honesty and parts from his innocence. War is the obvious catalyst for the cruel, anti-human elements in people. Bergman uses the war in this film exactly as he uses the heroine's illness in Through a Glass Darkly: to explore his view of man." — "Sculpting in Time" by Andrei Tarkovsky (translated by Kitty Hunter-Blair, 1987)

RadiantFilm

27,723 次观看 • 5 个月前