Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
Massive geopolitical shift. When Western nations imposed soft sanctions to cut off Turkey's missile engine supply, Turkey didn't back down. They built their own 100 percent domestic turbojet engine, completely decoupling from Western control. Total independence achieved.
21,292 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfügbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
Ähnliche Videos
2:04
Sensitive content
The jewish Modus Operandi:🧵 Orchestrated Diversity: Systematically import a "diverse" population into historically White nations through a sophisticated and well-funded political and organizational apparatus. Once the demographic shift is underway, they exploit the inevitable tensions that arise, such as the presence of arabs targeting jews. This is then weaponized to push for draconian policies that restrict freedoms for the entire population, despite the targeted group being only a tiny percentage. The narrative shifts from "diversity is our strength" to "diversity is a threat," but only when it serves their interests. Anti-White Propaganda: Relentlessly promote anti-White narratives through media, education, and cultural institutions. White identity is vilified as inherently oppressive, while every other identity is celebrated as virtuous and worthy of protection. Simultaneously, they cloak themselves in Whiteness when convenient, exploiting its privileges while undermining its foundations. This duality allows them to benefit from White societal structures while actively working to dismantle them. For example, they advocate for "equity" policies that disproportionately harm White populations while insulating themselves from the consequences by later abandoning the identification. Victimhood and Manipulation: When faced with resistance or criticism from White populations, they adopt a posture of victimhood, portraying themselves as persecuted despite their disproportionate influence in media, finance, and politics. This tactic is used to deflect accountability and silence dissent. For instance, any critique of their actions is labeled as "anti-Semitism," effectively shutting down debate and ensuring their agenda remains unchallenged. This strategy is so effective that even the slightest pushback is framed as an existential threat, further entrenching their control. Geopolitical Hypocrisy: While actively working to erode Western values and traditions, they paradoxically advocate for aggression against Eastern nations, framing them as the true threat to the West. This duality serves to distract from their own role in the destruction of Western civilization while advancing their global agenda. For example, they may push for sanctions or military action against countries like Iran, Russia or China, claiming these nations are undermining democracy, while simultaneously promoting policies that weaken Western sovereignty and cultural cohesion.
VΩX
50,577 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten
![This is hands-down the best explanation I've heard on why sanctions on Russia backfired, and why they were never going to succeed in the first place. By economist James K. Galbraith, professor at the University of Texas at Austin. Best quote of his explanation: "This is a situation in which the sanctions were imposed by one important sector of the world economy which then cut itself off from resources that it needs - and that's particularly true of Western Europe - in return for cutting Russia off from various things that Russia doesn't really need." Second best quote: "If you go back to the period before the introduction of the sanctions [...] the Russian economy was very heavily colonized by Western firms. That was true in automobiles, it was true in aircrafts, it was true in everything from fast food restaurants to big box stores. Western firms were present all throughout the Russian economy. A great many of them [...] either chose to exit Russia or were pressured to exit Russia after early 2022. So on what terms did they leave? Well, they were required, if they were leaving permanently, to sell their capital equipment, their factories and so forth, to let's say a Russian business which would get a loan from Russian banks or maybe have other sources of financing, at a very favorable price for the Russians. So effectively a lot of capital wealth, which was partly owned by the West, has been transferred to Russian ownership. And you now have an economy which is moving forward and has the advantage compared to Europe of relatively low resource costs because Russia is a great producer of resources, oil and gas and fertilizer and food stuff and so forth. And so while the Europeans are paying maybe twice in Germany what they were paying for energy, the Russians are not, they're paying perhaps less than they were paying before the war. So again I characterize the effect of the sanctions, in fact as being in certain respects a gift to the Russian economy. And this is, I think, quite different from what the authors of the sanctions expected. [...] And the essence of the situation is this would not have happened without the sanctions. You could have had the war, and it would have gone pretty much as it has gone. But the Russian government in 2022 was in no position to force the exit of Western firms. It didn't want to, wouldn't have done that. It was in no position to force its oligarchs to choose between Russia and the West. It didn't wish to do that. These choices were imposed by the West, and the results were actually, in many respects, favorable to the long-term independent development of the Russian Federation's economy."](https://image.24vids.com/tw-1767011514781999513/amplify_video_thumb/1766994201479442432/img/WnATtzHMWqxqlkJv.jpg)
