Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

MATH HOFFA EX CO-HOST CHAMP is alleging some WILD things… MATH & REMY MA??? WHATTTT 😳 Oh nahhhh… 2026 might need a reset

POLO WORLD

14,142 subscribers

107,747 views • 7 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Math Hoffa Ex CO HOST Champ DOUBLES DOWN on his Alleged Remy Ma & Math story…Ohhhh nahhhh he GOING OFF 😳

Math Hoffa Ex CO HOST Champ DOUBLES DOWN on his Alleged Remy Ma & Math story…Ohhhh nahhhh he GOING OFF 😳

POLO WORLD

45,341 views • 7 months ago

EAZY TBC RESPONDS TO RUMORS ABOUT REMY MA ALLEGEDLY SLEEPING W/ MATH HOFFA & HINTS AT REMY MA LEAVING BATTLE RAP “B4 I STARTED TALKIN TO REMY I NEVER HEARD NO RUMORS ABOUT HER BUT 4 SOME REASON AFTER ME THERES RUMORS..ITS BECOMING DISRESPECTFUL..MATH ALREADY SAID ITS NOT TRUE”

EAZY TBC RESPONDS TO RUMORS ABOUT REMY MA ALLEGEDLY SLEEPING W/ MATH HOFFA & HINTS AT REMY MA LEAVING BATTLE RAP “B4 I STARTED TALKIN TO REMY I NEVER HEARD NO RUMORS ABOUT HER BUT 4 SOME REASON AFTER ME THERES RUMORS..ITS BECOMING DISRESPECTFUL..MATH ALREADY SAID ITS NOT TRUE”

KING DNA TOOTH 👑🦷

108,846 views • 7 months ago

MATH HOFFA SUBTLY HINTS AT TSU SURF BEING A SNITCH IN DELETED SCENE & SAYS “ITS NOT MY PLACE TO SAY IF HE A SNITCH OR NOT BECAUSE U DON’T KNOW WHAT TYPE OF ENTITLEMENTS HE HAS NOW..IF THE RAPPER IS GETTING OUT 1ST,THERES SOME ENTITLEMENT”

MATH HOFFA SUBTLY HINTS AT TSU SURF BEING A SNITCH IN DELETED SCENE & SAYS “ITS NOT MY PLACE TO SAY IF HE A SNITCH OR NOT BECAUSE U DON’T KNOW WHAT TYPE OF ENTITLEMENTS HE HAS NOW..IF THE RAPPER IS GETTING OUT 1ST,THERES SOME ENTITLEMENT”

KING DNA TOOTH 👑🦷

238,648 views • 4 months ago

Terence Tao: "Previously, you needed a PhD to contribute to math research. Now a high school student can." Dwarkesh asks the world's most famous mathematician: what's your advice for someone considering a career in math, especially in light of AI progress? Tao is honest about uncertainty: "We live in a time of change. A particularly unpredictable era. Things that we've taken for granted for centuries may not hold anymore. The way we do everything... not just mathematics... will change." He admits his preference: "In many ways, I would prefer a much more boring, quiet era where things are much the same as they were 10 or 20 years ago. But one just has to embrace this. There's going to be a lot of change. The things you study... some of them may become obsolete or revolutionized. But some things will be retained." On new opportunities: "Previously, you had to go through years and years of education and get a math PhD before you could contribute to the frontier of math research. But now it's quite possible at the high school level that you could get involved in a math project and actually make a real contribution... because of all these AI tools and Lean and everything else." His advice: "There will be a lot of non-traditional opportunities to learn. You need a very adaptable mindset. There'll be worth pursuing things just for curiosity and for playing around. Still go through traditional education and learn math and science the old-fashioned way for a while... credentials will still be important. But you should also be open to very, very different ways of doing science. Some of which don't exist yet." He concludes: "It's a scary time. But also very exciting."

Terence Tao: "Previously, you needed a PhD to contribute to math research. Now a high school student can." Dwarkesh asks the world's most famous mathematician: what's your advice for someone considering a career in math, especially in light of AI progress? Tao is honest about uncertainty: "We live in a time of change. A particularly unpredictable era. Things that we've taken for granted for centuries may not hold anymore. The way we do everything... not just mathematics... will change." He admits his preference: "In many ways, I would prefer a much more boring, quiet era where things are much the same as they were 10 or 20 years ago. But one just has to embrace this. There's going to be a lot of change. The things you study... some of them may become obsolete or revolutionized. But some things will be retained." On new opportunities: "Previously, you had to go through years and years of education and get a math PhD before you could contribute to the frontier of math research. But now it's quite possible at the high school level that you could get involved in a math project and actually make a real contribution... because of all these AI tools and Lean and everything else." His advice: "There will be a lot of non-traditional opportunities to learn. You need a very adaptable mindset. There'll be worth pursuing things just for curiosity and for playing around. Still go through traditional education and learn math and science the old-fashioned way for a while... credentials will still be important. But you should also be open to very, very different ways of doing science. Some of which don't exist yet." He concludes: "It's a scary time. But also very exciting."

Jaynit

77,410 views • 3 months ago

Full episode of the first-ever Math Academy podcast with Jason Roberts: 0:00 - Introduction 4:00 - Applying the MA Way to X Growth 7:40 - Status of the ML Course and its Kick-Ass Coding Projects (Part 1) 25:50 - Jason's Near-Infinite List of Important Things 34:20 - The ML Course Has Been a Massive Undertaking 42:10 - Breadth-First Development 44:30 - Status of the ML Course and its Kick-Ass Coding Projects (Part 2) 50:15 - Why Math Academy Needs To Do a CS Course 56:45 - The Never-Ending Stream of Confusion 1:00:30 - The Story of Eurisko, the Most Advanced Math/CS Track in the USA 1:24:20 - Intuition Through Repetition: Machine Learning Edition 1:29:40 - The Importance of Spaced Review 1:43:30 - Upcoming Course Roadmap 1:47:40 - Spaced Repetition 2.0: Accounting For and Discouraging Reference Reliance 1:54:45 - Overhelping: A Pathology of the Over-Involved Parent/Tutor 1:59:21 - Yes, You Need to be Automatic on Math Facts (and Yes, Rapid-Fire Training is Coming) 2:04:55 - What Happens When Students Don't Know Their Math Facts 2:05:50 - The Horror of Attempting to Teach a Class When Students Have Multi-Year Deficits in Fundamental Skills 2:11:30 - Integrating Coding Into the Math Curriculum 2:18:00 - Combining Math and Coding is the Closest Thing to a Real-Life Superpower 2:18:55 - Creating a Full Math Degree and Getting Full College Credit 2:22:15 - The Power of Pre-Learning: The Greatest Educational Life Hack

Full episode of the first-ever Math Academy podcast with Jason Roberts: 0:00 - Introduction 4:00 - Applying the MA Way to X Growth 7:40 - Status of the ML Course and its Kick-Ass Coding Projects (Part 1) 25:50 - Jason's Near-Infinite List of Important Things 34:20 - The ML Course Has Been a Massive Undertaking 42:10 - Breadth-First Development 44:30 - Status of the ML Course and its Kick-Ass Coding Projects (Part 2) 50:15 - Why Math Academy Needs To Do a CS Course 56:45 - The Never-Ending Stream of Confusion 1:00:30 - The Story of Eurisko, the Most Advanced Math/CS Track in the USA 1:24:20 - Intuition Through Repetition: Machine Learning Edition 1:29:40 - The Importance of Spaced Review 1:43:30 - Upcoming Course Roadmap 1:47:40 - Spaced Repetition 2.0: Accounting For and Discouraging Reference Reliance 1:54:45 - Overhelping: A Pathology of the Over-Involved Parent/Tutor 1:59:21 - Yes, You Need to be Automatic on Math Facts (and Yes, Rapid-Fire Training is Coming) 2:04:55 - What Happens When Students Don't Know Their Math Facts 2:05:50 - The Horror of Attempting to Teach a Class When Students Have Multi-Year Deficits in Fundamental Skills 2:11:30 - Integrating Coding Into the Math Curriculum 2:18:00 - Combining Math and Coding is the Closest Thing to a Real-Life Superpower 2:18:55 - Creating a Full Math Degree and Getting Full College Credit 2:22:15 - The Power of Pre-Learning: The Greatest Educational Life Hack

Justin Skycak

66,588 views • 9 months ago

Oh My God this Sequel at Winding Oaks Flightline colts is nuts😱 This guys breeding is as insane as his Aura; dam is a Breeders Cup champ, hails from the same family as Shared Belief & has similar harmony to Crude Velocity below 🎶 Might need my man Zedan Racing Stables, Inc to clutch up again 🙏

Oh My God this Sequel at Winding Oaks Flightline colts is nuts😱 This guys breeding is as insane as his Aura; dam is a Breeders Cup champ, hails from the same family as Shared Belief & has similar harmony to Crude Velocity below 🎶 Might need my man Zedan Racing Stables, Inc to clutch up again 🙏

Save Horse Racing

56,216 views • 3 months ago

This Rogan x Gad Saad segment is low-key brilliant. Gad brings up John von Neumann — Hungarian Jewish polymath, mathematician, game theory pioneer. The big idea? Life is strategy. Not vibes. Game theory 101: Like the prisoner’s dilemma — every choice depends on what the other side might do. Confess or stay quiet. Cooperate or betray. Each move has consequences. Now scale that up… Cold War. Nukes. Two superpowers playing a giant, deadly chess match. That’s literally how we got mutually assured destruction — straight out of game theory. Some of the biggest decisions in history? Just math + strategy + human behavior colliding. Wild stuff.

This Rogan x Gad Saad segment is low-key brilliant. Gad brings up John von Neumann — Hungarian Jewish polymath, mathematician, game theory pioneer. The big idea? Life is strategy. Not vibes. Game theory 101: Like the prisoner’s dilemma — every choice depends on what the other side might do. Confess or stay quiet. Cooperate or betray. Each move has consequences. Now scale that up… Cold War. Nukes. Two superpowers playing a giant, deadly chess match. That’s literally how we got mutually assured destruction — straight out of game theory. Some of the biggest decisions in history? Just math + strategy + human behavior colliding. Wild stuff.

Crazy Videos

19,143 views • 6 months ago

🚨 WHY REALITY MIGHT BE A SIMULATION Roman said it sounds wild at first, but it really comes down to where tech already is. AI is getting close to human level. Digital worlds keep getting more realistic. Once it’s cheap to create intelligent beings inside them, you don’t run one simulation. You run billions, which makes it less likely you’re the original. He said it doesn’t even need full VR. Worlds filled with intelligent agents already count. And once intelligence scales, he said, it doesn’t need pictures or text to think. It can think in full worlds. That’s why simulation theory isn’t sci-fi, it’s just math and where technology is heading. Full interview with AI safety expert Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨 WHY REALITY MIGHT BE A SIMULATION Roman said it sounds wild at first, but it really comes down to where tech already is. AI is getting close to human level. Digital worlds keep getting more realistic. Once it’s cheap to create intelligent beings inside them, you don’t run one simulation. You run billions, which makes it less likely you’re the original. He said it doesn’t even need full VR. Worlds filled with intelligent agents already count. And once intelligence scales, he said, it doesn’t need pictures or text to think. It can think in full worlds. That’s why simulation theory isn’t sci-fi, it’s just math and where technology is heading. Full interview with AI safety expert Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

42,189 views • 6 months ago

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Past June, the economic and political math turns hard against Washington, and Iran is counting on it. Ex-JCPOA Negotiator Robert Malley says Iran knows that dragging this past June deepens the damage to both the U.S. economy and the Republican Party, and there is a camp in Tehran that believes surviving even another strike only proves their resilience again. He sketched four endings: a framework deal that reopens the strait, Trump declaring victory and walking away, another round of strikes to prove a point, or a grinding stalemate of no war and no peace that keeps claiming victims worldwide. On the strait itself, Robert says what he hears from the Iranians is that there is no return to the way things were. Some form of financial compensation is coming, whether through tolls, sanctions relief, or unfrozen assets. Robert Malley

🇮🇷🇺🇸 Past June, the economic and political math turns hard against Washington, and Iran is counting on it. Ex-JCPOA Negotiator Robert Malley says Iran knows that dragging this past June deepens the damage to both the U.S. economy and the Republican Party, and there is a camp in Tehran that believes surviving even another strike only proves their resilience again. He sketched four endings: a framework deal that reopens the strait, Trump declaring victory and walking away, another round of strikes to prove a point, or a grinding stalemate of no war and no peace that keeps claiming victims worldwide. On the strait itself, Robert says what he hears from the Iranians is that there is no return to the way things were. Some form of financial compensation is coming, whether through tolls, sanctions relief, or unfrozen assets. Robert Malley

Mario Nawfal

34,367 views • 2 months ago

Some World Cup visitors come to America expecting chaos... and leave wondering why everyone waved at them from a pickup truck. They figure out pretty quick we're a friendly bunch, might argue about everything under the sun, but we'll still help you change a tire, recommend a good diner, and call you “buddy" like we've known you since Little League. Then there's driving. They ask, "What's the speed limit here?" We say, "Well... technically 55." But what we mean is, "Keep up with traffic or prepare for judgment." And distance? We don't measure that in miles. "Oh, it's about 10 miles away" means nothing. "It's about 15 minutes if you hit the lights right" now that's real American math. By the time they leave, they've learned three things: Americans are nicer than advertised Speed limits are more of a group activity And everything, absolutely everything, is measured in how long it takes to get there Welcome to the U.S.—where the people are warm, the coffee is bottomless, and "just down the road" could mean anything.

Some World Cup visitors come to America expecting chaos... and leave wondering why everyone waved at them from a pickup truck. They figure out pretty quick we're a friendly bunch, might argue about everything under the sun, but we'll still help you change a tire, recommend a good diner, and call you “buddy" like we've known you since Little League. Then there's driving. They ask, "What's the speed limit here?" We say, "Well... technically 55." But what we mean is, "Keep up with traffic or prepare for judgment." And distance? We don't measure that in miles. "Oh, it's about 10 miles away" means nothing. "It's about 15 minutes if you hit the lights right" now that's real American math. By the time they leave, they've learned three things: Americans are nicer than advertised Speed limits are more of a group activity And everything, absolutely everything, is measured in how long it takes to get there Welcome to the U.S.—where the people are warm, the coffee is bottomless, and "just down the road" could mean anything.

G-PA

148,502 views • 1 month ago

🚨NEW: Peter Thiel with Joe Lonsdale on tariffs, trade policy, and China. "You need a very drastic reset with China. In theory, you need to reset with other people, but what we really need to get them to do is also reset things with China." Full episode drops next week! JOE: We've been talking about China on and off for over 20 years, and their imbalances. This week the President declared trade war on them, effectively, with 125% tariffs as of now; it'll probably change in the next few days. What do you think of the trade and tariff policy? What's gonna happen? Bond yields sold off more than I expected. The yields went higher than I expected so far. What's going on? PETER: I'm hesitant to comment since obviously it's a very, very fluid situation, but something like the sort of reset that they're talking about now seems where we're going, where you need a very drastic reset with China. In theory you need to reset with other people, but what we really need to get them to do is also reset things with China. I think the rough numbers are that about a quarter of the US trade deficit is bilaterally with China, but another quarter is indirectly with China. So China is sort of half the problem... And then China is the geopolitical rival. So there's a way in which people in Mercedes in Germany are selling cars to the US. We might want to have those pretty well paying jobs in the US and, and not in Germany. And there are all kinds of sort of mercantilist policies that at the margins Germany engages in. But, you know, it's probably not gonna repurpose the Mercedes factory to build tanks to invade the US or something like this. Whereas this sort of dual use problem is the problem with China. ...There are ways the economic relationship with China is fairly efficient.... if people are working for a dollar and a half an hour in a Foxconn factory, we don't really want to get those jobs in Wisconsin. But it is this geopolitical rivalry where... you have to somehow factor in that the economists never are able to factor in properly with China. I'm not sure I would call this the optimistic plan, but the reset in trade that seems desirable to me would be that we radically changed the relationship with China and we sort of induce a lot of other countries to radically change their relationship with China. And that's how we, you know, maybe that's how we build a stronger western alliance of the free world. JOE: Well there's going to be some interesting negotiations in the next few months. Did you think that we could bring, maybe using AI, some more advanced manufacturing here that was in China? Is that a real thing the next decade to do a bunch more here, thanks to our more efficiencies and productivity? PETER: There's probably always a decent amount of things like that. You have to always be extremely granular on how expensive the robots are, how expensive the equipment is, because in some sense, manufacturing has been getting steadily more automated for 250 years. And you've had the machines that make the machines. The machines that make the machines are getting sort of smarter and more complicated. And there are ways in which AI is a quantum leap. There's a way in which it's just, you know, a natural continuation of this, you know, two century long process. I think there are some parts that can be moved to the US with AI. Maybe also if you change some of the environmental rules and some of the other anti-industrial policies we have in the US. But then if parts of this are moved to other emerging market countries. Vietnam is a communist country. It has bad mercantilist policies, but it's not planning to take over the world. And so at the margins, if we can move things from China to Vietnam, that's a big win.

🚨NEW: Peter Thiel with Joe Lonsdale on tariffs, trade policy, and China. "You need a very drastic reset with China. In theory, you need to reset with other people, but what we really need to get them to do is also reset things with China." Full episode drops next week! JOE: We've been talking about China on and off for over 20 years, and their imbalances. This week the President declared trade war on them, effectively, with 125% tariffs as of now; it'll probably change in the next few days. What do you think of the trade and tariff policy? What's gonna happen? Bond yields sold off more than I expected. The yields went higher than I expected so far. What's going on? PETER: I'm hesitant to comment since obviously it's a very, very fluid situation, but something like the sort of reset that they're talking about now seems where we're going, where you need a very drastic reset with China. In theory you need to reset with other people, but what we really need to get them to do is also reset things with China. I think the rough numbers are that about a quarter of the US trade deficit is bilaterally with China, but another quarter is indirectly with China. So China is sort of half the problem... And then China is the geopolitical rival. So there's a way in which people in Mercedes in Germany are selling cars to the US. We might want to have those pretty well paying jobs in the US and, and not in Germany. And there are all kinds of sort of mercantilist policies that at the margins Germany engages in. But, you know, it's probably not gonna repurpose the Mercedes factory to build tanks to invade the US or something like this. Whereas this sort of dual use problem is the problem with China. ...There are ways the economic relationship with China is fairly efficient.... if people are working for a dollar and a half an hour in a Foxconn factory, we don't really want to get those jobs in Wisconsin. But it is this geopolitical rivalry where... you have to somehow factor in that the economists never are able to factor in properly with China. I'm not sure I would call this the optimistic plan, but the reset in trade that seems desirable to me would be that we radically changed the relationship with China and we sort of induce a lot of other countries to radically change their relationship with China. And that's how we, you know, maybe that's how we build a stronger western alliance of the free world. JOE: Well there's going to be some interesting negotiations in the next few months. Did you think that we could bring, maybe using AI, some more advanced manufacturing here that was in China? Is that a real thing the next decade to do a bunch more here, thanks to our more efficiencies and productivity? PETER: There's probably always a decent amount of things like that. You have to always be extremely granular on how expensive the robots are, how expensive the equipment is, because in some sense, manufacturing has been getting steadily more automated for 250 years. And you've had the machines that make the machines. The machines that make the machines are getting sort of smarter and more complicated. And there are ways in which AI is a quantum leap. There's a way in which it's just, you know, a natural continuation of this, you know, two century long process. I think there are some parts that can be moved to the US with AI. Maybe also if you change some of the environmental rules and some of the other anti-industrial policies we have in the US. But then if parts of this are moved to other emerging market countries. Vietnam is a communist country. It has bad mercantilist policies, but it's not planning to take over the world. And so at the margins, if we can move things from China to Vietnam, that's a big win.

American Optimist

316,973 views • 1 year ago

10 market-neutral PMs, each 80% idiosyncratic. Put them in one book and the math quietly breaks: Rich Falk-Wallace (Rich Falk-Wallace, ex-Citadel PM, founder of Arcana) explains: "Say you have 10 books with momentum exposure. They're long tech, long the latest exciting thing — but they're market neutral. Even if they each have 80% idio, at scale, that 80 comes down. If every one of your PMs has a similar-ish exposure, that book average — even though you've gotten more breadth — is actually much lower. Your idio might be 60. The reason is that factor bets compound on each other. They've been designed to be those things which are sources of correlation. So those things compound. Whereas the remainder — whatever's not a factor bet — diversifies. It becomes like a loaded coin with a 52% hit rate. Take 10,000 coin flips, and the average reduces to the hit rate. Those things diversify. The factor bets don't. You could add 100, you could add 10,000 — it wouldn't reduce the volatility driven by that similarly pointed factor exposure. The independent, idiosyncratic bets diversify away at scale."

10 market-neutral PMs, each 80% idiosyncratic. Put them in one book and the math quietly breaks: Rich Falk-Wallace (Rich Falk-Wallace, ex-Citadel PM, founder of Arcana) explains: "Say you have 10 books with momentum exposure. They're long tech, long the latest exciting thing — but they're market neutral. Even if they each have 80% idio, at scale, that 80 comes down. If every one of your PMs has a similar-ish exposure, that book average — even though you've gotten more breadth — is actually much lower. Your idio might be 60. The reason is that factor bets compound on each other. They've been designed to be those things which are sources of correlation. So those things compound. Whereas the remainder — whatever's not a factor bet — diversifies. It becomes like a loaded coin with a 52% hit rate. Take 10,000 coin flips, and the average reduces to the hit rate. Those things diversify. The factor bets don't. You could add 100, you could add 10,000 — it wouldn't reduce the volatility driven by that similarly pointed factor exposure. The independent, idiosyncratic bets diversify away at scale."

Ethan Kho

30,538 views • 1 month ago

😳 JUST-IN: SOME THINGS NEVER CHANGE, IS THOM TILLIS BETRAYING THE RIGHT ONE LAST TIME?! Ok, now the mask is all the way off. Thom Tillis is retiring, so there are no voters to answer to and no primary to survive. He used that freedom to walk onto the Senate floor and declare war on the one bill President Trump wants most. "I'm a no," Tillis said. "I'm going to do everything I can to prevent it from even moving forward." Now here is the math he never wants you to do. Gallup has 84 percent of Americans backing voter ID, including 98 percent of Republicans and 67 percent of Democrats. Pew puts it at 83 percent in favor, just 16 percent opposed. Tillis is not standing on principle, he is standing with the 16 percent. He cosponsored this same bill before Trump put his name on it, which tells you everything about who he is really serving on his way out the door.

😳 JUST-IN: SOME THINGS NEVER CHANGE, IS THOM TILLIS BETRAYING THE RIGHT ONE LAST TIME?! Ok, now the mask is all the way off. Thom Tillis is retiring, so there are no voters to answer to and no primary to survive. He used that freedom to walk onto the Senate floor and declare war on the one bill President Trump wants most. "I'm a no," Tillis said. "I'm going to do everything I can to prevent it from even moving forward." Now here is the math he never wants you to do. Gallup has 84 percent of Americans backing voter ID, including 98 percent of Republicans and 67 percent of Democrats. Pew puts it at 83 percent in favor, just 16 percent opposed. Tillis is not standing on principle, he is standing with the 16 percent. He cosponsored this same bill before Trump put his name on it, which tells you everything about who he is really serving on his way out the door.

Bill Mitchell

25,323 views • 29 days ago

$Google just had its DeepSeek moment — and almost nobody's talking about it. Here's the story you need to know. 🧵 When DeepSeek dropped in early 2025, it didn't just impress people. It scared them. A model competing with the biggest AI players — at a fraction of the cost — through math, not hardware. Chip stocks tanked. The industry panicked. Then on March 24th, 2026, Google published a research paper called TurboQuant. Cloudflare's CEO immediately called it Google's DeepSeek moment. Memory chip stocks for Micron and Western Digital fell on the news. Why? Because TurboQuant compresses AI memory by 6x — through software alone. → No new chips needed → No retraining required → One server can now host more models than before The era of throwing hardware at AI problems is ending. The era of mathematical efficiency is here. ✅Save this post, you'll thank yourself when this reshapes every AI tool you use. 📌 Want the SOP? DM me.$

Google just had its DeepSeek moment — and almost nobody's talking about it. Here's the story you need to know. 🧵 When DeepSeek dropped in early 2025, it didn't just impress people. It scared them. A model competing with the biggest AI players — at a fraction of the cost — through math, not hardware. Chip stocks tanked. The industry panicked. Then on March 24th, 2026, Google published a research paper called TurboQuant. Cloudflare's CEO immediately called it Google's DeepSeek moment. Memory chip stocks for Micron and Western Digital fell on the news. Why? Because TurboQuant compresses AI memory by 6x — through software alone. → No new chips needed → No retraining required → One server can now host more models than before The era of throwing hardware at AI problems is ending. The era of mathematical efficiency is here. ✅Save this post, you'll thank yourself when this reshapes every AI tool you use. 📌 Want the SOP? DM me.

Julian Goldie SEO

12,731 views • 4 months ago

🚨🎙️Ben Foster on Why Jordan Henderson Could Be Exactly What Chelsea Need Ben Foster: “Do you remember when we played Liverpool at Vicarage Road?” Co-host: “Yeah.” Ben Foster: “There was one player in particular who stood out more than anybody else on that pitch. Liverpool beat us comfortably, I think it was 5-0 or 3-0, but the scoreline wasn’t even the thing that stayed with me. It was Jordan Henderson. Honestly, every single one of us came off that pitch saying exactly the same thing: ‘Wow, he’s so important to that team.’ You could feel his presence everywhere.” Co-host: “He was like an on-field manager.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. And that’s the thing people don’t always see when they’re watching on TV. They see the passes, the running, the tackles, but they don’t see the constant communication. He had so much quality, but his leadership was on another level entirely.” Co-host: “Even players like Mané and Salah were looking at him for information. You could see them turning to him for instructions, guidance, reassurance. It was like he was the heartbeat of the entire team.” Ben Foster: “That’s what blew me away. We’re talking about some of the best players in world football, and even they trusted Henderson’s voice. Every few seconds he was pointing, directing, organising, demanding more. To see it firsthand at the highest level was incredible.” Co-host: “At the very top level.” Ben Foster: “The absolute top level. And afterwards in the dressing room, every one of us was talking about him. We weren’t talking about Salah’s goals or Mané’s pace. We were talking about Henderson. That’s how much influence he had over that Liverpool side.” Co-host: “You could tell the players would run through a brick wall for him.” Ben Foster: “Without a doubt. If Henderson told them to push harder, they pushed harder. If he told them to stay calm, they stayed calm. If he told them to jump, they’d ask how high. That’s genuine leadership. That’s something you can’t teach.” Co-host: “And that’s why so many managers value him.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. In modern football, everybody talks about tactics, systems and technical ability, but dressing rooms still need leaders. They still need characters who can hold standards, keep players accountable and drive the group forward when things get difficult.” Co-host: “Which is probably why clubs keep looking at him despite his age.” Ben Foster: “One hundred percent. And if you ask me, that’s exactly why I think he’d be a fantastic addition for Chelsea. They’ve got talent everywhere you look. Young, exciting players with massive potential. But sometimes what takes a talented squad to the next level is having that experienced voice in the dressing room every single day.” Co-host: “Someone who sets the standards.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. Someone who demands excellence in training, someone who isn’t afraid to speak up when things aren’t right, someone who has won the biggest trophies and knows what it takes to get over the line. Henderson brings all of that.” Co-host: “You think that’s why Xabi Alonso was so keen on him as well?” Ben Foster: “Absolutely. Managers like Xabi Alonso understand that football isn’t just played with your feet, it’s played with your mentality. Henderson gives you leadership, professionalism, organisation and belief. Those qualities spread through a squad. That’s why I can completely understand why Alonso would go all in for him. Players like that are rare. They make everyone around them better.” Co-host: “So for Chelsea, it would be about more than just what he does on the pitch?” Ben Foster: “Much more. It’s about culture. It’s about mentality. It’s about helping young players understand what elite standards look like every single day. That’s what Jordan Henderson brings, and that’s why every manager who has worked with him speaks so highly of him. You don’t replace that easily.” (THE FOZCAST)

🚨🎙️Ben Foster on Why Jordan Henderson Could Be Exactly What Chelsea Need Ben Foster: “Do you remember when we played Liverpool at Vicarage Road?” Co-host: “Yeah.” Ben Foster: “There was one player in particular who stood out more than anybody else on that pitch. Liverpool beat us comfortably, I think it was 5-0 or 3-0, but the scoreline wasn’t even the thing that stayed with me. It was Jordan Henderson. Honestly, every single one of us came off that pitch saying exactly the same thing: ‘Wow, he’s so important to that team.’ You could feel his presence everywhere.” Co-host: “He was like an on-field manager.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. And that’s the thing people don’t always see when they’re watching on TV. They see the passes, the running, the tackles, but they don’t see the constant communication. He had so much quality, but his leadership was on another level entirely.” Co-host: “Even players like Mané and Salah were looking at him for information. You could see them turning to him for instructions, guidance, reassurance. It was like he was the heartbeat of the entire team.” Ben Foster: “That’s what blew me away. We’re talking about some of the best players in world football, and even they trusted Henderson’s voice. Every few seconds he was pointing, directing, organising, demanding more. To see it firsthand at the highest level was incredible.” Co-host: “At the very top level.” Ben Foster: “The absolute top level. And afterwards in the dressing room, every one of us was talking about him. We weren’t talking about Salah’s goals or Mané’s pace. We were talking about Henderson. That’s how much influence he had over that Liverpool side.” Co-host: “You could tell the players would run through a brick wall for him.” Ben Foster: “Without a doubt. If Henderson told them to push harder, they pushed harder. If he told them to stay calm, they stayed calm. If he told them to jump, they’d ask how high. That’s genuine leadership. That’s something you can’t teach.” Co-host: “And that’s why so many managers value him.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. In modern football, everybody talks about tactics, systems and technical ability, but dressing rooms still need leaders. They still need characters who can hold standards, keep players accountable and drive the group forward when things get difficult.” Co-host: “Which is probably why clubs keep looking at him despite his age.” Ben Foster: “One hundred percent. And if you ask me, that’s exactly why I think he’d be a fantastic addition for Chelsea. They’ve got talent everywhere you look. Young, exciting players with massive potential. But sometimes what takes a talented squad to the next level is having that experienced voice in the dressing room every single day.” Co-host: “Someone who sets the standards.” Ben Foster: “Exactly. Someone who demands excellence in training, someone who isn’t afraid to speak up when things aren’t right, someone who has won the biggest trophies and knows what it takes to get over the line. Henderson brings all of that.” Co-host: “You think that’s why Xabi Alonso was so keen on him as well?” Ben Foster: “Absolutely. Managers like Xabi Alonso understand that football isn’t just played with your feet, it’s played with your mentality. Henderson gives you leadership, professionalism, organisation and belief. Those qualities spread through a squad. That’s why I can completely understand why Alonso would go all in for him. Players like that are rare. They make everyone around them better.” Co-host: “So for Chelsea, it would be about more than just what he does on the pitch?” Ben Foster: “Much more. It’s about culture. It’s about mentality. It’s about helping young players understand what elite standards look like every single day. That’s what Jordan Henderson brings, and that’s why every manager who has worked with him speaks so highly of him. You don’t replace that easily.” (THE FOZCAST)

MatchReport

140,965 views • 16 days ago

We can be tax neutral and eliminate 125 million people off the tax rolls. Anybody making $100,000 or less doesn't pay any taxes." Vinod Khosla (Vinod Khosla) on how AI could change the tax code forever: AI will favor capital over labor — so equalize the capital gains tax with ordinary income tax. The math works: 40% of capital gains tax is already paid by people making more than $10 million a year. "The single biggest danger to AI is not AI capability. The single biggest danger to AI adoption is politics." "There will be massive job dislocation. Will there be new kinds of jobs? Maybe, maybe not. I don't know. There's very few things AI won't be able to do today or in the next few years." "I do think we need to get the benefits of AI to people before we start disrupting people." The Hill & Valley Forum 2026 The Hill & Valley Forum

We can be tax neutral and eliminate 125 million people off the tax rolls. Anybody making $100,000 or less doesn't pay any taxes." Vinod Khosla (Vinod Khosla) on how AI could change the tax code forever: AI will favor capital over labor — so equalize the capital gains tax with ordinary income tax. The math works: 40% of capital gains tax is already paid by people making more than $10 million a year. "The single biggest danger to AI is not AI capability. The single biggest danger to AI adoption is politics." "There will be massive job dislocation. Will there be new kinds of jobs? Maybe, maybe not. I don't know. There's very few things AI won't be able to do today or in the next few years." "I do think we need to get the benefits of AI to people before we start disrupting people." The Hill & Valley Forum 2026 The Hill & Valley Forum

The Hill & Valley Forum

44,674 views • 4 months ago

Joe Lonsdale: The people in charge of the sociology department at Yale and the education school at Stanford are still god**mn socialists who hate business and are bad for our civilization. But they've learned not to say certain things... A lot of people say, 'Oh, I'm not hearing this stuff anymore. It must be gone.' It's not gone. It's going to come out again as soon as they win. ZUBY: interviews Joe Lonsdale for Real Talk with Zuby Zuby: I feel like there's a change that is happening over the last couple of years with the pendulum starting to swing back. Joe: It's happening in some areas and others. Zuby: How do you see it? Joe: A lot of this, again, is tied to Marxists and socialists who are actively plotting to take over institutions. That's what they've done for the last 60 years. There's the very famous march through the institutions... I thought it was a conspiracy theory when I first heard about it. But it's very clear they've done this very successfully. And you can think of it almost like a virus... In this case, I think the virus has learned to hide itself... A lot of the people who run all of these conquered institutions haven't changed. The people in charge of the sociology department at Yale and the people in charge of the education school at Stanford are still godd*mn socialists who hate businesses and who are bad for our civilization. But they've learned not to say certain things. They've learned not to very publicly and openly say, 'We shouldn't have advanced math anymore,' which is what the education department in general is doing. They're going around getting rid of advanced math for equity purposes... A lot of people say, 'Oh, I'm not hearing this stuff anymore. It must be gone.' It's not frickin gone. It's going to come out again as soon as they win, as soon as they feel like they're safe. But right now they're hiding. I think it's hiding everywhere.

Joe Lonsdale: The people in charge of the sociology department at Yale and the education school at Stanford are still god**mn socialists who hate business and are bad for our civilization. But they've learned not to say certain things... A lot of people say, 'Oh, I'm not hearing this stuff anymore. It must be gone.' It's not gone. It's going to come out again as soon as they win. ZUBY: interviews Joe Lonsdale for Real Talk with Zuby Zuby: I feel like there's a change that is happening over the last couple of years with the pendulum starting to swing back. Joe: It's happening in some areas and others. Zuby: How do you see it? Joe: A lot of this, again, is tied to Marxists and socialists who are actively plotting to take over institutions. That's what they've done for the last 60 years. There's the very famous march through the institutions... I thought it was a conspiracy theory when I first heard about it. But it's very clear they've done this very successfully. And you can think of it almost like a virus... In this case, I think the virus has learned to hide itself... A lot of the people who run all of these conquered institutions haven't changed. The people in charge of the sociology department at Yale and the people in charge of the education school at Stanford are still godd*mn socialists who hate businesses and who are bad for our civilization. But they've learned not to say certain things. They've learned not to very publicly and openly say, 'We shouldn't have advanced math anymore,' which is what the education department in general is doing. They're going around getting rid of advanced math for equity purposes... A lot of people say, 'Oh, I'm not hearing this stuff anymore. It must be gone.' It's not frickin gone. It's going to come out again as soon as they win, as soon as they feel like they're safe. But right now they're hiding. I think it's hiding everywhere.

American Optimist

86,820 views • 1 month ago

School Board: Minneapolis (Minneapolis Public Schools) When: June 2026 Topic: Deconstructing enrollment 🤡 I can't make this 💩up if I tried. Board member Lori Norvell challenges us to look at enrollment "in a different way" because we look at things "through the lens of what we know as very white centered, Eurocentric education." What's her suggestion? "I don't know what we might have." She just knows we need to do some deconstructing... "I would challenge us to deconstruct our ideas on that, deconstruct the things that we're comfortable with, and really think about what is best for our Native American students and their families." It's cool though, she hits all the right virtue signal words: - Eurocentric - white centered - deconstruct - harm - comfortable/space I just want all of you reading this to realize 19,774 people voted for Lori, and she holds a board position in a district with ~30k students. It's worth the time really internalizing how crazy that is...

School Board: Minneapolis (Minneapolis Public Schools) When: June 2026 Topic: Deconstructing enrollment 🤡 I can't make this 💩up if I tried. Board member Lori Norvell challenges us to look at enrollment "in a different way" because we look at things "through the lens of what we know as very white centered, Eurocentric education." What's her suggestion? "I don't know what we might have." She just knows we need to do some deconstructing... "I would challenge us to deconstruct our ideas on that, deconstruct the things that we're comfortable with, and really think about what is best for our Native American students and their families." It's cool though, she hits all the right virtue signal words: - Eurocentric - white centered - deconstruct - harm - comfortable/space I just want all of you reading this to realize 19,774 people voted for Lori, and she holds a board position in a district with ~30k students. It's worth the time really internalizing how crazy that is...

Mark Gilson 🌱

45,279 views • 2 months ago

If you read "The Call of Cthulhu" carefully, and do some research, it's possible to work out the size of the creature encountered by the Emma's crew. The narrator says it's "Cthulhu" but we don't know this for sure. It might have "just" been a starspawn. I've done the math for you in the video below. Cutting to the chase, it turns out that Cthulhu is an exceedingly convenient size for tabletop roleplayers. He is, in fact, the same size with respect to humans that the average gamemaster is with respect to 28mm figures. You can scoop up your players' minis in your green flabby claw and say, "This is Cthulhu's size to you puny mortals. Roll for initiative." Cthulhu doesn't even need to regenerate to shrug off their tiny swords and arrows. A mighty wizard's lightning bolt is like a carpet spark. And if that size isn't enough for you, just take it for granted that the monster in the story wasn't Cthulhu, and the real deal is even bigger. Or you can assume Cthulhu has shrunk during the past 12,000 years (the last time he was out and about, causing the Pleistocene extinction) but will soon bulk larger.

If you read "The Call of Cthulhu" carefully, and do some research, it's possible to work out the size of the creature encountered by the Emma's crew. The narrator says it's "Cthulhu" but we don't know this for sure. It might have "just" been a starspawn. I've done the math for you in the video below. Cutting to the chase, it turns out that Cthulhu is an exceedingly convenient size for tabletop roleplayers. He is, in fact, the same size with respect to humans that the average gamemaster is with respect to 28mm figures. You can scoop up your players' minis in your green flabby claw and say, "This is Cthulhu's size to you puny mortals. Roll for initiative." Cthulhu doesn't even need to regenerate to shrug off their tiny swords and arrows. A mighty wizard's lightning bolt is like a carpet spark. And if that size isn't enough for you, just take it for granted that the monster in the story wasn't Cthulhu, and the real deal is even bigger. Or you can assume Cthulhu has shrunk during the past 12,000 years (the last time he was out and about, causing the Pleistocene extinction) but will soon bulk larger.

Sandy Petersen 🪔

21,388 views • 8 months ago