Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Me realizing my AI has a 32K context window after the enterprise drops 100 pages of compliance docs on its desk SubQ’s new Snap takes up to 384K tokens in one call and leads Jev on 13 of 16 Decision Index benchmarks. $0.05 per million input tokens. Output is free.

Not Jerome Powell

2,071,140 subscribers

17,642 views • 1 day ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Nace shows Drex playing a strategy game. i gave it a harder opponent: my timeline Spoiler Guard sends each post to the new decision model and blurs the spoilers, 352 post checked in one session with sub-second calls → 128K context window, per Nace the first and only decision model at that size → #1 on the Decision Index, a Jev rival for $0.04 per 1M input tokens → no text generated, just a probability per post try it with 250M free tokens from Nace AI:

Nace shows Drex playing a strategy game. i gave it a harder opponent: my timeline Spoiler Guard sends each post to the new decision model and blurs the spoilers, 352 post checked in one session with sub-second calls → 128K context window, per Nace the first and only decision model at that size → #1 on the Decision Index, a Jev rival for $0.04 per 1M input tokens → no text generated, just a probability per post try it with 250M free tokens from Nace AI:

Israfil

12,350 views • 13 days ago

GLM-5.3 Flash Abliterated is FREE 😳 a new research version of GLM-5.3 Flash is now open for testing - 1M context window - up to 131K output tokens - 33.5 tokens/sec - free to use - OpenAI-compatible API built for coding and AI research available directly in the cloud test it here: free access is available now 👀

GLM-5.3 Flash Abliterated is FREE 😳 a new research version of GLM-5.3 Flash is now open for testing - 1M context window - up to 131K output tokens - 33.5 tokens/sec - free to use - OpenAI-compatible API built for coding and AI research available directly in the cloud test it here: free access is available now 👀

Oliver Prompts

19,060 views • 9 days ago

JEV ENGINEERING JUST CUT A CLAUDE LOOP FROM $765/MONTH TO $3.02 the expensive part isn’t always writing code. a busy overnight loop can burn ~600 decisions just asking what to do next, whether a command is safe, or if the task is finished. trigger → Jev → allow / stop / wake → Claude only builds when needed at roughly 4,000 tokens per decision, those checks can cost ~$25.50 a night on Fable 5.1. Jev handles the same decision layer at $0.042 per 1M input tokens with output free. over 30 nights that moves the decision bill from ~$765 to $3.02. batch multiple questions into one call and it falls again to about $1.08/month. that’s the part i care about: Claude keeps the expensive work that actually needs intelligence, while Jev handles the hundreds of tiny judgment calls around it.

JEV ENGINEERING JUST CUT A CLAUDE LOOP FROM $765/MONTH TO $3.02 the expensive part isn’t always writing code. a busy overnight loop can burn ~600 decisions just asking what to do next, whether a command is safe, or if the task is finished. trigger → Jev → allow / stop / wake → Claude only builds when needed at roughly 4,000 tokens per decision, those checks can cost ~$25.50 a night on Fable 5.1. Jev handles the same decision layer at $0.042 per 1M input tokens with output free. over 30 nights that moves the decision bill from ~$765 to $3.02. batch multiple questions into one call and it falls again to about $1.08/month. that’s the part i care about: Claude keeps the expensive work that actually needs intelligence, while Jev handles the hundreds of tiny judgment calls around it.

Gipp 🦅

25,081 views • 16 days ago

China is literally on 🔥 Baidu from China has launched ERNIE 4.5 and ERNIE X1 and it’s freaking cheap . Here is everything you need to know. ERNIE 4.5 - Native multimodal and Outperforms GPT 4.5 in multiple benchmarks at just 1% of GPT 4.5 price - OpenAI GPT 4.5 – Input: $75 / 1M tokens, Output: $150 / 1M tokens; - ERNIE 4.5 – Input: $0.55 / 1M tokens, Output: $2.20 / 1M tokens ERNIE X1 - A deep thinking reasoning model with multimodal capabilities on par with DeepSeek R1 at only half the price See it in action and check out the pricing details👇 📹 source : yiyan[.]baidu[.]com 1/6 ERNIE 4.5 is a multimodal which can take Audio files as well.

China is literally on 🔥 Baidu from China has launched ERNIE 4.5 and ERNIE X1 and it’s freaking cheap . Here is everything you need to know. ERNIE 4.5 - Native multimodal and Outperforms GPT 4.5 in multiple benchmarks at just 1% of GPT 4.5 price - OpenAI GPT 4.5 – Input: $75 / 1M tokens, Output: $150 / 1M tokens; - ERNIE 4.5 – Input: $0.55 / 1M tokens, Output: $2.20 / 1M tokens ERNIE X1 - A deep thinking reasoning model with multimodal capabilities on par with DeepSeek R1 at only half the price See it in action and check out the pricing details👇 📹 source : yiyan[.]baidu[.]com 1/6 ERNIE 4.5 is a multimodal which can take Audio files as well.

AshutoshShrivastava

324,324 views • 1 year ago

this is pure f*cking treasure TypeSafeAI engineers spelled out in their docs exactly how Jev fits inside an agent, and these patterns are perfect one rule behind all of them: the LLM thinks, jev decides, code acts I mapped them into 9 live schemes: > model routing jev picks the cheapest model that can do the step > guardrails screens what your agent reads before it acts > tool-call gating every tool call gets allow, ask or deny before it runs > inbox triage the agent only opens what actually needs a reply > reranking jev scores 30 passages, the agent gets the best two > llm evals grades the output and sends it back if it falls short > bulk labeling one question fanned out over a huge table, the agent reads the counts > real-time control games, bots, trading loops: a decision every tick > confidence gate act, confirm or hand it to a human. your code sets the thresholds, not the LLM why it works: > ~100 ms per decision > $0.042 per 1M input tokens, output tokens free > calibrated probabilities on every answer one LLM does the thinking. jev makes the thousand small calls in between save this before you wire your next agent

this is pure f*cking treasure TypeSafeAI engineers spelled out in their docs exactly how Jev fits inside an agent, and these patterns are perfect one rule behind all of them: the LLM thinks, jev decides, code acts I mapped them into 9 live schemes: > model routing jev picks the cheapest model that can do the step > guardrails screens what your agent reads before it acts > tool-call gating every tool call gets allow, ask or deny before it runs > inbox triage the agent only opens what actually needs a reply > reranking jev scores 30 passages, the agent gets the best two > llm evals grades the output and sends it back if it falls short > bulk labeling one question fanned out over a huge table, the agent reads the counts > real-time control games, bots, trading loops: a decision every tick > confidence gate act, confirm or hand it to a human. your code sets the thresholds, not the LLM why it works: > ~100 ms per decision > $0.042 per 1M input tokens, output tokens free > calibrated probabilities on every answer one LLM does the thinking. jev makes the thousand small calls in between save this before you wire your next agent

NO1ennn

24,699 views • 13 days ago

Unlimited-OCR is a 3B parameter model that parses entire 100-page PDFs in one shot — no page chunking, no lost context. +⁠32K context window, reads the whole document in a single pass +⁠93% on standard parsing benchmarks, +6 over baseline +⁠Under 0.11 error rate past page 40 — where every other OCR tool falls apart ⁠+Multilingual out of the box, runs locally via Transformers, Ollama, llama.cpp, Docker +⁠Textract, Google Vision, and Azure Doc Intelligence charge $1.50–$15 per 1,000 pages 1.9M downloads on HuggingFace and most people have never heard of it. This runs on your machine. For free. Forever. Model link:

Unlimited-OCR is a 3B parameter model that parses entire 100-page PDFs in one shot — no page chunking, no lost context. +⁠32K context window, reads the whole document in a single pass +⁠93% on standard parsing benchmarks, +6 over baseline +⁠Under 0.11 error rate past page 40 — where every other OCR tool falls apart ⁠+Multilingual out of the box, runs locally via Transformers, Ollama, llama.cpp, Docker +⁠Textract, Google Vision, and Azure Doc Intelligence charge $1.50–$15 per 1,000 pages 1.9M downloads on HuggingFace and most people have never heard of it. This runs on your machine. For free. Forever. Model link:

0xMarioNawfal

84,500 views • 2 months ago

China f*cked the world again DeepSeek just dropped a killer library that saves up to 98% on tokens ur GPT Astra and Opus 5.5 it's DeepGEMM, the engine DeepSeek trains and runs its own models on faster GPU math -> more tokens per GPU -> cheaper tokens > plug the engine DeepSeek uses into your own models > squeeze more tokens per second out of the GPUs you already pay for > match or beat expert-tuned GPU libraries on speed u will pay $1.6 instead of $50 its sitting in one public repo, link below

China f*cked the world again DeepSeek just dropped a killer library that saves up to 98% on tokens ur GPT Astra and Opus 5.5 it's DeepGEMM, the engine DeepSeek trains and runs its own models on faster GPU math -> more tokens per GPU -> cheaper tokens > plug the engine DeepSeek uses into your own models > squeeze more tokens per second out of the GPUs you already pay for > match or beat expert-tuned GPU libraries on speed u will pay $1.6 instead of $50 its sitting in one public repo, link below

Mnimiy

436,543 views • 9 days ago

GLM 5.2 INPUT FELL FROM $1.40 TO SEVEN CENTS PER MILLION IN NINETY DAYS • what it costs now > $0.07 per million input at the cheapest of 20 providers, a 95% drop in three months. > direct still lists $1.40 in and $4.40 out, with cached input at $0.26. > Same model, same weights, twenty-fold spread depending on the door you walk through. • the free way in > New accounts on get 20M tokens: > 744B MoE, 1M context, MIT weights you can also just download and self-host. Nobody announced this. It happened one provider at a time -> and the model itself never changed. Check which provider you are actually routed through before you top up anywhere ↓

GLM 5.2 INPUT FELL FROM $1.40 TO SEVEN CENTS PER MILLION IN NINETY DAYS • what it costs now > $0.07 per million input at the cheapest of 20 providers, a 95% drop in three months. > direct still lists $1.40 in and $4.40 out, with cached input at $0.26. > Same model, same weights, twenty-fold spread depending on the door you walk through. • the free way in > New accounts on get 20M tokens: > 744B MoE, 1M context, MIT weights you can also just download and self-host. Nobody announced this. It happened one provider at a time -> and the model itself never changed. Check which provider you are actually routed through before you top up anywhere ↓

slash1s

30,276 views • 2 months ago

NVIDIA just made paying for AI feel optional. Open model, a million tokens of context, free tier with no per-token cost, runs on your own hardware. Entire codebases, whole data rooms, a year of chat logs, all swallowed in one prompt. No chunking, no RAG, no rate limit theater. The closed-AI premium has 90 days to defend itself. Bookmark this and come back. Open beat closed. Again.

NVIDIA just made paying for AI feel optional. Open model, a million tokens of context, free tier with no per-token cost, runs on your own hardware. Entire codebases, whole data rooms, a year of chat logs, all swallowed in one prompt. No chunking, no RAG, no rate limit theater. The closed-AI premium has 90 days to defend itself. Bookmark this and come back. Open beat closed. Again.

shmidt

295,692 views • 4 months ago

GEMMA 4 26B ON AN RTX 4060 WITH A 248K TOKEN CONTEXT WINDOW 20 tokens per second and a context window so large you can feed it entire codebases, books and research papers in a single prompt this is not a cloud api and not a server rack, this is a regular consumer gpu running locally with llama.cpp and q4_k_xl quantization 248k context on an 8gb vram card was not supposed to be possible and here it is just running on someone’s desk the article below covers exactly which tools and configs make this kind of setup work in 2026 ↓

GEMMA 4 26B ON AN RTX 4060 WITH A 248K TOKEN CONTEXT WINDOW 20 tokens per second and a context window so large you can feed it entire codebases, books and research papers in a single prompt this is not a cloud api and not a server rack, this is a regular consumer gpu running locally with llama.cpp and q4_k_xl quantization 248k context on an 8gb vram card was not supposed to be possible and here it is just running on someone’s desk the article below covers exactly which tools and configs make this kind of setup work in 2026 ↓

leopardracer

56,865 views • 4 months ago

I designed these worksheets to turn Agentic AI concepts into simple math problems you can do by hand. ✍️ Download PDF: Problems 1 to 5: 1. Count the tokens: split on spaces, one word per box 2. Subword splitting: when one word is three tokens 3. Punctuation counts: the marks are tokens too 4. Tokens per word: the ratio that turns words into a bill 5. Will it fit? A document against a context window Why am I making these worksheets? AI is making people (including me) think less. It's just too easy to ask AI a few questions about a new AI concept and start to believe I get it. Until recently, we could use a coding problem to practice a new AI concept. But now it has become too easy to ask AI to write the code, and we start to think we must know the concept, since we technically solved a coding problem. Thus, my approach is to recast AI concepts as simple math problems we must solve with pen and paper. Using our hands is one way to motivate ourselves to start thinking again. ✍️ ~ Prof. Tom Yeh

I designed these worksheets to turn Agentic AI concepts into simple math problems you can do by hand. ✍️ Download PDF: Problems 1 to 5: 1. Count the tokens: split on spaces, one word per box 2. Subword splitting: when one word is three tokens 3. Punctuation counts: the marks are tokens too 4. Tokens per word: the ratio that turns words into a bill 5. Will it fit? A document against a context window Why am I making these worksheets? AI is making people (including me) think less. It's just too easy to ask AI a few questions about a new AI concept and start to believe I get it. Until recently, we could use a coding problem to practice a new AI concept. But now it has become too easy to ask AI to write the code, and we start to think we must know the concept, since we technically solved a coding problem. Thus, my approach is to recast AI concepts as simple math problems we must solve with pen and paper. Using our hands is one way to motivate ourselves to start thinking again. ✍️ ~ Prof. Tom Yeh

Tom Yeh

18,291 views • 2 months ago

AIOZ AI Playgrounds are LIVE. Now it’s time to explore! Introducing AIOZ AI Model of the Month, a new campaign highlighting one featured model and rewarding your creativity. How to join: → Explore the featured model in its dedicated AIOZ AI Playground → Post your Playground results on X with a screenshot including input & output → Reply to this post with your screenshot to enter the lucky draw Lucky draw rewards: → 5 winners share 3,000 AIOZ tokens → AIOZ AI credits (credited directly on AIOZ AI) Duration: 1 month February Featured Model: Image to Anime Explore your first AI Playground and show us what you’ve created!

AIOZ AI Playgrounds are LIVE. Now it’s time to explore! Introducing AIOZ AI Model of the Month, a new campaign highlighting one featured model and rewarding your creativity. How to join: → Explore the featured model in its dedicated AIOZ AI Playground → Post your Playground results on X with a screenshot including input & output → Reply to this post with your screenshot to enter the lucky draw Lucky draw rewards: → 5 winners share 3,000 AIOZ tokens → AIOZ AI credits (credited directly on AIOZ AI) Duration: 1 month February Featured Model: Image to Anime Explore your first AI Playground and show us what you’ve created!

AIOZ Network

755,162 views • 7 months ago

I thought my AI agent needed a bigger context window wrong the leak was my shell every time it ran git diff HEAD~5 the model ate 92,000 tokens after ztk 18,000 ls -la src 2,000 tokens became 53 cargo test passing 397 tokens became 21 the fix is a 260KB Zig binary that sits between your agent and the shell it compresses command output before it hits the model not by summarizing everything by knowing what each command actually needs to preserve > diffs keep changed lines > tests keep failures > ls keeps structure > logs dedupe repeats > JSON and errors pass through untouched 5.8M tokens saved in one 256 command session stop buying bigger context windows while feeding your agent raw terminal sewage

I thought my AI agent needed a bigger context window wrong the leak was my shell every time it ran git diff HEAD~5 the model ate 92,000 tokens after ztk 18,000 ls -la src 2,000 tokens became 53 cargo test passing 397 tokens became 21 the fix is a 260KB Zig binary that sits between your agent and the shell it compresses command output before it hits the model not by summarizing everything by knowing what each command actually needs to preserve > diffs keep changed lines > tests keep failures > ls keeps structure > logs dedupe repeats > JSON and errors pass through untouched 5.8M tokens saved in one 256 command session stop buying bigger context windows while feeding your agent raw terminal sewage

Alpha Batcher

17,516 views • 5 months ago

🔥🚨 DEVELOPING: DNC Chairman Ken Martin is facing a HR complaint after The New York Times reported he threw his phone at a junior aide's desk in a fit of rage. Meanwhile the DNC is $2 million in debt, has put its own HQ up as collateral for a $15 million loan, and is begging vendors not to send invoices until after the midterms while Trump controls a $400 million super PAC and the RNC has $130 million on hand.

🔥🚨 DEVELOPING: DNC Chairman Ken Martin is facing a HR complaint after The New York Times reported he threw his phone at a junior aide's desk in a fit of rage. Meanwhile the DNC is $2 million in debt, has put its own HQ up as collateral for a $15 million loan, and is begging vendors not to send invoices until after the midterms while Trump controls a $400 million super PAC and the RNC has $130 million on hand.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

35,099 views • 2 months ago

VERCEL + CLOUDFLARE + CLAUDE CODE all picked up Jev in 6 days... an AI that can't write a single word became the fastest adopted model on Vercel's AI Gateway Jev decides → big model thinks → code authorizes TypeSafe dropped it on September 15, founder Diogo Almeida worked on ChatGPT research at OpenAI it answers three ways: pick one option, rate it on a scale, or yes/no with a percentage "which agent next?" comes back as Researcher 71% / Coder 18% / Reviewer 11% Vercel says almost 13% of its paying teams tried it within the first 24 hours on Vercel's leaderboard it pulled about 26% of all requests but only 1.8% of tokens TypeSafe's own tests: up to 194x faster and 445x cheaper than regular models TypeSafe calls it a System One Model, named after Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow your expensive model stops burning tokens on yes or no questions and only gets the hard ones 6 days, 110 community use cases, zero words written ↓

VERCEL + CLOUDFLARE + CLAUDE CODE all picked up Jev in 6 days... an AI that can't write a single word became the fastest adopted model on Vercel's AI Gateway Jev decides → big model thinks → code authorizes TypeSafe dropped it on September 15, founder Diogo Almeida worked on ChatGPT research at OpenAI it answers three ways: pick one option, rate it on a scale, or yes/no with a percentage "which agent next?" comes back as Researcher 71% / Coder 18% / Reviewer 11% Vercel says almost 13% of its paying teams tried it within the first 24 hours on Vercel's leaderboard it pulled about 26% of all requests but only 1.8% of tokens TypeSafe's own tests: up to 194x faster and 445x cheaper than regular models TypeSafe calls it a System One Model, named after Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow your expensive model stops burning tokens on yes or no questions and only gets the hard ones 6 days, 110 community use cases, zero words written ↓

leopardracer

16,184 views • 11 days ago

This weekend I invented something new, a new type of token using Uniswap v4 hooks that I call a Pair Token. A Pair Token is a new type of ERC-20. It is a fused, auto-compounding asset, a fusion of two tokens. For example, the stock tokens NVDA and SPCX fused into a single tokenized version of the two, with the ticker NVDASPCX, or ETH with NVDA, creating ETHNVDA. Each Pair Token represents a full-range Uniswap v4 liquidity pool. So why mint these tokens? These tokens are self-multiplying in terms of value, as at any moment anyone can call the compound function to compound the LP fees generated by the pair’s trading activity back into the asset. The token represents a new financial primitive, as it represents a proportional value and moves as an LP position NFT would, except that it is auto-compounding and, thanks to its v4 hook, allows for compounding and self-growth. Since it is an ERC-20, this token can be freely traded onchain, LPed, or even paired with a launchpad. A new type of token for a new type of exposure and strategy. Starting tonight, you’ll be able to mint or redeem Pair Tokens for any pair on Robinhood Chain via the StonkBrokers website. Minting and redeeming are free, and the compounding process on the tokens incurs a 10% fee on the LP fees generated, which is used for $STONKBROKER buybacks. I look forward to a new line of products and protocols on Robinhood Chain using this new financial primitive. Only on Robinhood Chain, powered by Uniswap. Hookr

This weekend I invented something new, a new type of token using Uniswap v4 hooks that I call a Pair Token. A Pair Token is a new type of ERC-20. It is a fused, auto-compounding asset, a fusion of two tokens. For example, the stock tokens NVDA and SPCX fused into a single tokenized version of the two, with the ticker NVDASPCX, or ETH with NVDA, creating ETHNVDA. Each Pair Token represents a full-range Uniswap v4 liquidity pool. So why mint these tokens? These tokens are self-multiplying in terms of value, as at any moment anyone can call the compound function to compound the LP fees generated by the pair’s trading activity back into the asset. The token represents a new financial primitive, as it represents a proportional value and moves as an LP position NFT would, except that it is auto-compounding and, thanks to its v4 hook, allows for compounding and self-growth. Since it is an ERC-20, this token can be freely traded onchain, LPed, or even paired with a launchpad. A new type of token for a new type of exposure and strategy. Starting tonight, you’ll be able to mint or redeem Pair Tokens for any pair on Robinhood Chain via the StonkBrokers website. Minting and redeeming are free, and the compounding process on the tokens incurs a 10% fee on the LP fees generated, which is used for $STONKBROKER buybacks. I look forward to a new line of products and protocols on Robinhood Chain using this new financial primitive. Only on Robinhood Chain, powered by Uniswap. Hookr

SimpleFarmer

57,549 views • 7 hours ago

🚨 CHINA JUST OPEN SOURCED AN OCR THAT EATS 100 PAGE PDFS IN ONE PASS It’s called Unlimited OCR. Only 3B params. Runs locally. Every other OCR tool chops your doc into pages and loses the thread. This one reads the whole thing in one continuous pass. → One shot full context parsing (32K context window) → Multilingual out of the box → 93% on the standard parsing benchmark (6 points over baseline) → Under 0.11 error rate past 40 pages → Runs 100% locally on your own hardware → Works with Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, Docker, Ollama, llama.cpp Traditional cloud OCR (Textract, Google Vision, Azure Doc Intelligence) costs $1.50 to $15 per 1,000 pages. This runs on your machine. For free. Forever. Baidu built it explicitly to push DeepSeek OCR one step further. Already at 1.9M downloads on Hugging Face and most people have no idea it exists yet. 100% open source.

🚨 CHINA JUST OPEN SOURCED AN OCR THAT EATS 100 PAGE PDFS IN ONE PASS It’s called Unlimited OCR. Only 3B params. Runs locally. Every other OCR tool chops your doc into pages and loses the thread. This one reads the whole thing in one continuous pass. → One shot full context parsing (32K context window) → Multilingual out of the box → 93% on the standard parsing benchmark (6 points over baseline) → Under 0.11 error rate past 40 pages → Runs 100% locally on your own hardware → Works with Transformers, vLLM, SGLang, Docker, Ollama, llama.cpp Traditional cloud OCR (Textract, Google Vision, Azure Doc Intelligence) costs $1.50 to $15 per 1,000 pages. This runs on your machine. For free. Forever. Baidu built it explicitly to push DeepSeek OCR one step further. Already at 1.9M downloads on Hugging Face and most people have no idea it exists yet. 100% open source.

Brooks Whale X 🐋

476,338 views • 3 days ago

this is certified f*cking gold a 23-year-old from China runs 300 Claude Code agents at once with Jev engineering, and not one of them gets to lie to him he opens the dashboard live: 300 Claude Code agents running in parallel Jev checking every output against its source in about 100 milliseconds pointed at 100 companies in the EV market: > pass 1 - 12 rejected: wrong revenue, dead citations, empty fields > pass 2 - 3 rejected > pass 3 - zero. every row filed straight into an Obsidian vault the whole trick is the split Claude Code does the work, Jev decides whether each claim actually matches the source Jev never writes a second opinion. it answers yes or no with a confidence score, at $0.042 per million tokens in and the loop won't stop while anything is still wrong an analyst team bills weeks for 100 verified company profiles. he gets them in one run one model writes, a cheaper one decides, and nothing ships until it says yes

this is certified f*cking gold a 23-year-old from China runs 300 Claude Code agents at once with Jev engineering, and not one of them gets to lie to him he opens the dashboard live: 300 Claude Code agents running in parallel Jev checking every output against its source in about 100 milliseconds pointed at 100 companies in the EV market: > pass 1 - 12 rejected: wrong revenue, dead citations, empty fields > pass 2 - 3 rejected > pass 3 - zero. every row filed straight into an Obsidian vault the whole trick is the split Claude Code does the work, Jev decides whether each claim actually matches the source Jev never writes a second opinion. it answers yes or no with a confidence score, at $0.042 per million tokens in and the loop won't stop while anything is still wrong an analyst team bills weeks for 100 verified company profiles. he gets them in one run one model writes, a cheaper one decides, and nothing ships until it says yes

Hanako

36,736 views • 7 days ago