正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

MEF Executive Testifies On US Foreign Aid Being Used To Fund Terror When Middle East Forum (MEF) Executive Director Gregg Roman testified before a US Congressional House Committee on US foreign spending in February 2025, he confirmed what many of Africa’s greatest voices have warned for decades: that foreign... aid is not altruism, but a tool of colonial dominance. In his own words, billions of dollars have flowed from the US to terrorist groups across the Global South, fueling conflicts, destabilizing regions and endangering millions of lives. A geopolitical partner that gives with one hand and destabilizes with the other is not a geopolitical partner at all. It is an existential threat. And when Africa finally controls its own resources, its own development and its own security… that threat will finally be neutralized.show more

The Spearhead

70,245 subscribers

99,381 次观看 • 7 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Mike Cuckabee is repeating the same lie he told Tucker Carlson during his interview: "Israel spends its US military aid in the US, supporting the US economy." This lie has become the default rebuttal to anyone who challenges the rationale behind US military aid to Israel. Under the current Memorandum of Understanding, Israel is required to spend a gradually increasing amount of US aid inside of the US, while gradually decreasing the amount of aid it spends with its own defense industry in Israel. In other words, every year, "off-shore procurement" (OSP) must be reduced until the entirety of the US aid is spent within the US. The problem is, Israeli defense contractors have opened up subsidiaries in the US, so they're technically no longer considered "off-shore." So, Israel can theoretically spend all $3.8B in aid it receives every year with its own defense contractors in the US. These Israeli defense contractors may employ some American workers in non-sensitive roles, but the parent companies in Israel are still benefiting through the profit and expertise of their American operations. Some of the Israeli defense contractors who have set up subsidiaries in the US include Elbit Systems, IAI North America, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, XTEND, etc. Further, Israel is one of only a few countries that is allowed to use its aid to contract directly with US-based defense contractors, instead of being forced to use the Pentagon as a middleman to buy its weapons. This process is called Direct Commercial Sales (as opposed to Foreign Military Sales) which decreases the transparency in how Israel is spending its aid money since these transactions usually have confidentiality agreements. Having said all of this, Israel does spend some of its aid money with US defense contractors. For example, it used its aid grants to purchase the F-35 from Lockheed Martin. But, what 99% of the American public doesn't know is that the contracts for these purchases have offset agreements that force Lcokheed Martin to buy billions of dollars worth of parts, systems, and services from Israeli defense contractors which "offsets" the cost of Israel's purchases from US contractors by generating money for its own defense industry. Incidentally, the offset mechanism is a good proxy for how the new provision in the 2027 NDAA will work, essentially creating a dependency on the Israeli defense industry for the US military. Even though Israel would no longer receive aid, they would be jointly developing technology with the US, similar to what Raytheon and Rafael did with the Iron Dome. The irony of this is that after the Iron Dome was completed, Israel refused to give the US the software source code for it, so it couldn't be integrated into the US defense network. Solid partner, right? Also, in light of the shortage of rare earths within the US defense industry due to China tightening its export controls, it seems absurd that the US wants to increase its dependency on another foreign country for its own national security. In reality, the NDAA provision is just a way for Jews to hide Israel's parasitical relationship with the US since the US will continue to keep billions of dollars of weapons stockpiles in its WRSA-I weapons depot in Israel, which the Israelis can use if needed. This weapon reserve is funded by American taxpayers but is not counted as aid to Israel despite the fact that Israel uses it. And of course, Congress will pass any emergency aid appropriations if Israel needs additional military aid, just like Congress did after Israel depleted its stockpiles of bombs on Palestinian women and children. To sum up, Israel spends a significant portion of its US aid on its own contractors located in the US, and even when it does spend US aid on US contractors, they use offsets to force those contractors to buy parts from Israeli contractors. Israel is a parasite and Mike Cuckabee is aiding and abetting the fleecing of America.

Mike Cuckabee is repeating the same lie he told Tucker Carlson during his interview: "Israel spends its US military aid in the US, supporting the US economy." This lie has become the default rebuttal to anyone who challenges the rationale behind US military aid to Israel. Under the current Memorandum of Understanding, Israel is required to spend a gradually increasing amount of US aid inside of the US, while gradually decreasing the amount of aid it spends with its own defense industry in Israel. In other words, every year, "off-shore procurement" (OSP) must be reduced until the entirety of the US aid is spent within the US. The problem is, Israeli defense contractors have opened up subsidiaries in the US, so they're technically no longer considered "off-shore." So, Israel can theoretically spend all $3.8B in aid it receives every year with its own defense contractors in the US. These Israeli defense contractors may employ some American workers in non-sensitive roles, but the parent companies in Israel are still benefiting through the profit and expertise of their American operations. Some of the Israeli defense contractors who have set up subsidiaries in the US include Elbit Systems, IAI North America, Rafael Advanced Defense Systems, XTEND, etc. Further, Israel is one of only a few countries that is allowed to use its aid to contract directly with US-based defense contractors, instead of being forced to use the Pentagon as a middleman to buy its weapons. This process is called Direct Commercial Sales (as opposed to Foreign Military Sales) which decreases the transparency in how Israel is spending its aid money since these transactions usually have confidentiality agreements. Having said all of this, Israel does spend some of its aid money with US defense contractors. For example, it used its aid grants to purchase the F-35 from Lockheed Martin. But, what 99% of the American public doesn't know is that the contracts for these purchases have offset agreements that force Lcokheed Martin to buy billions of dollars worth of parts, systems, and services from Israeli defense contractors which "offsets" the cost of Israel's purchases from US contractors by generating money for its own defense industry. Incidentally, the offset mechanism is a good proxy for how the new provision in the 2027 NDAA will work, essentially creating a dependency on the Israeli defense industry for the US military. Even though Israel would no longer receive aid, they would be jointly developing technology with the US, similar to what Raytheon and Rafael did with the Iron Dome. The irony of this is that after the Iron Dome was completed, Israel refused to give the US the software source code for it, so it couldn't be integrated into the US defense network. Solid partner, right? Also, in light of the shortage of rare earths within the US defense industry due to China tightening its export controls, it seems absurd that the US wants to increase its dependency on another foreign country for its own national security. In reality, the NDAA provision is just a way for Jews to hide Israel's parasitical relationship with the US since the US will continue to keep billions of dollars of weapons stockpiles in its WRSA-I weapons depot in Israel, which the Israelis can use if needed. This weapon reserve is funded by American taxpayers but is not counted as aid to Israel despite the fact that Israel uses it. And of course, Congress will pass any emergency aid appropriations if Israel needs additional military aid, just like Congress did after Israel depleted its stockpiles of bombs on Palestinian women and children. To sum up, Israel spends a significant portion of its US aid on its own contractors located in the US, and even when it does spend US aid on US contractors, they use offsets to force those contractors to buy parts from Israeli contractors. Israel is a parasite and Mike Cuckabee is aiding and abetting the fleecing of America.

Curse

13,343 次观看 • 1 个月前

Foreign aid is a tool of our foreign policy. It is not the only tool of our foreign policy. It has to be taken in conjunction with all of these other things that we do, and they have to be intertwined. — Secretary Marco Rubio to the Senate Appropriations Committee

Foreign aid is a tool of our foreign policy. It is not the only tool of our foreign policy. It has to be taken in conjunction with all of these other things that we do, and they have to be intertwined. — Secretary Marco Rubio to the Senate Appropriations Committee

Department of State

101,767 次观看 • 1 年前

🇺🇸🇪🇺🇺🇦🚨 FULL SPEECH: The US secretary of defense Hegseth says: - The Bloodbath Must End - Returning to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic goal and pursuing this false goal will only increase suffering - The US does not believe that Ukraine's membership in NATO is a realistic outcome of the upcoming negotiations - If there are any peacekeepers in Ukraine, it will not be under the auspices of NATO and not in accordance with Article 5 of the Charter - US troops will not go to Ukraine, US military presence cannot be part of security guarantees - It is Europe that should provide Ukraine with more military aid - 2% is not enough, Trump calls on Europe to increase military spending to 5% of GDP - The US is facing threats to its own borders and will focus on protecting them - Communist China is a threat to US borders and US prioritizes such threats - The US will no longer tolerate NATO's unequal defense policies that create dependency

🇺🇸🇪🇺🇺🇦🚨 FULL SPEECH: The US secretary of defense Hegseth says: - The Bloodbath Must End - Returning to Ukraine's pre-2014 borders is an unrealistic goal and pursuing this false goal will only increase suffering - The US does not believe that Ukraine's membership in NATO is a realistic outcome of the upcoming negotiations - If there are any peacekeepers in Ukraine, it will not be under the auspices of NATO and not in accordance with Article 5 of the Charter - US troops will not go to Ukraine, US military presence cannot be part of security guarantees - It is Europe that should provide Ukraine with more military aid - 2% is not enough, Trump calls on Europe to increase military spending to 5% of GDP - The US is facing threats to its own borders and will focus on protecting them - Communist China is a threat to US borders and US prioritizes such threats - The US will no longer tolerate NATO's unequal defense policies that create dependency

Lord Bebo

601,449 次观看 • 1 年前

[WATCH] The DA like other political parties is a NON STATE ACTOR . They may have their own foreign policy as a party, but States only transact with other State Actors and that must be respected. Helen is not leading government foreign policy. The President and his executive are State Actors and they have the responsibility to restore relations amongst States for the benefit of all South Africans. Our foreign policy is embedded on the principle of human solidarity and justice, and that is informed by our own history. Our foreign policy is imbedded on the principle of multilateralism. We don’t act outside of the UN, AU and SADC. We do not act on our own, we act with others. #MbalulaAncSGspeaks

[WATCH] The DA like other political parties is a NON STATE ACTOR . They may have their own foreign policy as a party, but States only transact with other State Actors and that must be respected. Helen is not leading government foreign policy. The President and his executive are State Actors and they have the responsibility to restore relations amongst States for the benefit of all South Africans. Our foreign policy is embedded on the principle of human solidarity and justice, and that is informed by our own history. Our foreign policy is imbedded on the principle of multilateralism. We don’t act outside of the UN, AU and SADC. We do not act on our own, we act with others. #MbalulaAncSGspeaks

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

38,844 次观看 • 1 年前

‘America is never going to pay its debts, it doesn’t have to. Its debts are in its own currency, we can simply print it. The African debt is not in its currency. Africa has to earn the US dollars.’ Donald Trump may rail against de-dollarisation and BRICS, but for Africa and many countries of the global south, this is why de-dollarisation is not a political choice, but an economic necessity.

‘America is never going to pay its debts, it doesn’t have to. Its debts are in its own currency, we can simply print it. The African debt is not in its currency. Africa has to earn the US dollars.’ Donald Trump may rail against de-dollarisation and BRICS, but for Africa and many countries of the global south, this is why de-dollarisation is not a political choice, but an economic necessity.

Going Underground

59,368 次观看 • 1 年前

Hamas is the biggest threat to the wellbeing and security of innocent Palestinians in Gaza. Instead of investing in the future of Gaza’s children, Hamas has used all of its resources to fund terror and to line the pockets of its own leaders. #FreeGazazFromHamas

Hamas is the biggest threat to the wellbeing and security of innocent Palestinians in Gaza. Instead of investing in the future of Gaza’s children, Hamas has used all of its resources to fund terror and to line the pockets of its own leaders. #FreeGazazFromHamas

Israel ישראל

2,772,184 次观看 • 2 年前

🇨🇳🇺🇸🇻🇪 China strongly CONDEMNS the US for illegally redirecting Venezuelan oil exports to US — Chinese Foreign Ministry "US has brazenly resorted to the use of force against Venezuela and demanded that America first be applied when disposes of its own oil resources" "This is a typical act of bullying"

🇨🇳🇺🇸🇻🇪 China strongly CONDEMNS the US for illegally redirecting Venezuelan oil exports to US — Chinese Foreign Ministry "US has brazenly resorted to the use of force against Venezuela and demanded that America first be applied when disposes of its own oil resources" "This is a typical act of bullying"

Lord Bebo

30,517 次观看 • 5 个月前

We’re all set to celebrate the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Eritrea. It’s a nation that has stood firmly on its own and never relied on foreign aid. An Early Congratulations to Eritrea on its way to becoming a powerhouse in East Africa and the Red Sea region. 🇪🇷 🇸🇴 ❤️

We’re all set to celebrate the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Eritrea. It’s a nation that has stood firmly on its own and never relied on foreign aid. An Early Congratulations to Eritrea on its way to becoming a powerhouse in East Africa and the Red Sea region. 🇪🇷 🇸🇴 ❤️

Elham Ishmael ✍︎

32,981 次观看 • 2 个月前

BRANDON WEICHERT: Washington is captured by special interests that keep us tied to Europe and the Middle East. But the world is tripolar: The US, Russia, and China. Our foreign policy must prioritize our own hemisphere and resources, not foreign quagmires. Brandon Weichert

BRANDON WEICHERT: Washington is captured by special interests that keep us tied to Europe and the Middle East. But the world is tripolar: The US, Russia, and China. Our foreign policy must prioritize our own hemisphere and resources, not foreign quagmires. Brandon Weichert

Bannon’s WarRoom

14,851 次观看 • 10 个月前

#WATCH | New York | Responding to a question by ANI on secondary sanctions imposed on India by the US for importing Russian oil, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says, "(The economic partnership between India and Russia) is not under threat... The Indian Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs have made it clear that India chooses its own partners. If the US has proposals on how to enrich bilateral trade between the US and India, they are prepared to discuss the terms for that, whatever terms the US might put forth. But when it comes to trade, investment, economic, military, technological, and other relations between India and third states, it is something that India will discuss only with those states in question." (Source: UNTV via Reuters)

#WATCH | New York | Responding to a question by ANI on secondary sanctions imposed on India by the US for importing Russian oil, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov says, "(The economic partnership between India and Russia) is not under threat... The Indian Prime Minister and the Minister of Foreign Affairs have made it clear that India chooses its own partners. If the US has proposals on how to enrich bilateral trade between the US and India, they are prepared to discuss the terms for that, whatever terms the US might put forth. But when it comes to trade, investment, economic, military, technological, and other relations between India and third states, it is something that India will discuss only with those states in question." (Source: UNTV via Reuters)

ANI

77,926 次观看 • 9 个月前

Epic. Ana Kasparian not only has unhinged antisemitic foul mouthed outbursts on Piers Morgan against me and Shabbos Kestenbaum, she also genuinely believes that social security expenditures are “less impactful” than US spending on foreign conflicts. 😂 A few more key stats for Ana: 1. The entire US foreign aid budget is ~3% of the US budget 2. The entire US defense budget was under one trillion dollars…1/3 of entitlements 3. Social security (along with Medicare and Medicaid) is $3 trillion annually 4. 99.7% of the U.S. foreign aid package to Israel is reinvested in the U.S. economy and provides 56k-76k American jobs annually. Could not love Scott Jennings’s face more when she said that social security was less of an issue than aid to Israel. 🤣 Seriously though, why does Abby D. Phillip have guests like this on? Ana cannot make a coherent argument without an emotional meltdown. She’s an embarrassment to her own cause and has the brain capacity of a jellyfish.

Epic. Ana Kasparian not only has unhinged antisemitic foul mouthed outbursts on Piers Morgan against me and Shabbos Kestenbaum, she also genuinely believes that social security expenditures are “less impactful” than US spending on foreign conflicts. 😂 A few more key stats for Ana: 1. The entire US foreign aid budget is ~3% of the US budget 2. The entire US defense budget was under one trillion dollars…1/3 of entitlements 3. Social security (along with Medicare and Medicaid) is $3 trillion annually 4. 99.7% of the U.S. foreign aid package to Israel is reinvested in the U.S. economy and provides 56k-76k American jobs annually. Could not love Scott Jennings’s face more when she said that social security was less of an issue than aid to Israel. 🤣 Seriously though, why does Abby D. Phillip have guests like this on? Ana cannot make a coherent argument without an emotional meltdown. She’s an embarrassment to her own cause and has the brain capacity of a jellyfish.

Emily Schrader - אמילי שריידר امیلی شریدر

45,678 次观看 • 10 个月前

The Strait of Hormuz and the Western Hypocrisy Africa Can No Longer Afford to Ignore Since the US‑Israeli war on Iran began, President Donald Trump’s actions have exposed how American foreign policy often changes based on self-interest. When Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global oil supply, Trump first lifted sanctions on Russian oil and then allowed Iran to sell its own oil — the very country the US is at war with. These moves show that rules the US imposes on others can be suspended when convenient. For Africa, this is a clear warning. Africa must build its own systems in finance, politics, and trade, and pursue partnerships that benefit the continent; with or without Washington’s approval.

The Strait of Hormuz and the Western Hypocrisy Africa Can No Longer Afford to Ignore Since the US‑Israeli war on Iran began, President Donald Trump’s actions have exposed how American foreign policy often changes based on self-interest. When Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz, threatening global oil supply, Trump first lifted sanctions on Russian oil and then allowed Iran to sell its own oil — the very country the US is at war with. These moves show that rules the US imposes on others can be suspended when convenient. For Africa, this is a clear warning. Africa must build its own systems in finance, politics, and trade, and pursue partnerships that benefit the continent; with or without Washington’s approval.

The Spearhead

21,758 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇩🇪 Merz “Germany is rearming not because of what the US president says, but for its own interests.” By 2030, Germany will become Europe’s biggest military spender, with €180bn+ annually. Europe needs its own unified military policy as its interests will increasingly diverge from the US. The EU must build a unified military-industrial system, joint procurement, common production and a real European foreign policy. Europe cannot remain strategically dependent on other powers’ foreign policy objectives.

🇩🇪 Merz “Germany is rearming not because of what the US president says, but for its own interests.” By 2030, Germany will become Europe’s biggest military spender, with €180bn+ annually. Europe needs its own unified military policy as its interests will increasingly diverge from the US. The EU must build a unified military-industrial system, joint procurement, common production and a real European foreign policy. Europe cannot remain strategically dependent on other powers’ foreign policy objectives.

Marcos Agustín

32,900 次观看 • 4 天前

🚨 Dr Andrey Kortunov: ‘War on Iran🇮🇷 is a graphic manifestation of the LIMITS OF US🇺🇸 POWER’ 'The United States should recognise the limits of its power, and the current situation in the Gulf is a very graphic manifestation of these limits. The US is not the only guy in town. It has to accept that other players might have their own interests, their own views and their own priorities. Definitely, Trump is primarily about destruction. He's not about building something new. So I'm not sure that the US instincts will shift momentarily. Maybe another administration should come to power in Washington to formally recognise these limitations of the US power. India is doing what it believes is best for its own national interests. On some issues, it might keep in mind US priorities and demands. But on other issues, clearly, it will ignore US demands as excessive and unrealistic.' —Dr Andrey Kortunov, Political Analyst at the Valdai International Discussion Club, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇

🚨 Dr Andrey Kortunov: ‘War on Iran🇮🇷 is a graphic manifestation of the LIMITS OF US🇺🇸 POWER’ 'The United States should recognise the limits of its power, and the current situation in the Gulf is a very graphic manifestation of these limits. The US is not the only guy in town. It has to accept that other players might have their own interests, their own views and their own priorities. Definitely, Trump is primarily about destruction. He's not about building something new. So I'm not sure that the US instincts will shift momentarily. Maybe another administration should come to power in Washington to formally recognise these limitations of the US power. India is doing what it believes is best for its own national interests. On some issues, it might keep in mind US priorities and demands. But on other issues, clearly, it will ignore US demands as excessive and unrealistic.' —Dr Andrey Kortunov, Political Analyst at the Valdai International Discussion Club, on the latest episode of New Order. Watch the full interview in the quoted post below. 👇

New Order with Afshin Rattansi

29,999 次观看 • 21 天前

The US Secretary of State Marco Rubio insisted in his testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the country is not withdrawing from the world, as he batted away criticism of cuts to foreign aid and diplomatic budgets

The US Secretary of State Marco Rubio insisted in his testimony to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that the country is not withdrawing from the world, as he batted away criticism of cuts to foreign aid and diplomatic budgets

Reuters

34,203 次观看 • 1 年前

Jeffrey Sachs: China is not a threat to the US, the only threat is nuclear war. In September 2024, Jeffrey Sachs and John Mearsheimer joined the besties for a foreign policy panel. Sachs expressed that due to the size of the US, its importance, its oceans, and its military, nuclear war was the ONLY threat, far above any peer competitor. He also explained how the escalatory mindset of the US Deep State continues to lead us in that direction. "I deeply believe that China is not a threat to the United States." "And I deeply believe the only threat to the United States in the world, given the oceans, given our size, and given the military, is nuclear war." "I deeply believe we're close to nuclear war because we have a mindset that leads us in that direction." "We have a mindset that everything is a challenge for survival and that escalation is therefore always the right approach." "My view is a little bit of prudence could save the whole planet."

Jeffrey Sachs: China is not a threat to the US, the only threat is nuclear war. In September 2024, Jeffrey Sachs and John Mearsheimer joined the besties for a foreign policy panel. Sachs expressed that due to the size of the US, its importance, its oceans, and its military, nuclear war was the ONLY threat, far above any peer competitor. He also explained how the escalatory mindset of the US Deep State continues to lead us in that direction. "I deeply believe that China is not a threat to the United States." "And I deeply believe the only threat to the United States in the world, given the oceans, given our size, and given the military, is nuclear war." "I deeply believe we're close to nuclear war because we have a mindset that leads us in that direction." "We have a mindset that everything is a challenge for survival and that escalation is therefore always the right approach." "My view is a little bit of prudence could save the whole planet."

The All-In Podcast

32,176 次观看 • 1 年前

Germany's Chancellor Merz: We all know that security in Europe has fundamentally changed in recent years. It is clear that Russia poses an imminent threat to us. In this time of geopolitical uncertainty and growing security challenges, Germany carries a special responsibility, not only for its own future, but also for the unity of Europe as a whole. We are transforming our army, the Bundeswehr, into the strongest conventional army in Europe.

Germany's Chancellor Merz: We all know that security in Europe has fundamentally changed in recent years. It is clear that Russia poses an imminent threat to us. In this time of geopolitical uncertainty and growing security challenges, Germany carries a special responsibility, not only for its own future, but also for the unity of Europe as a whole. We are transforming our army, the Bundeswehr, into the strongest conventional army in Europe.

Clash Report

28,584 次观看 • 1 个月前

After the strikes on Iran, the US received the most massive response: missiles were fired at US bases in various countries. Now, the US is faced with a choice: to defend its bases and ships or to help its partners, of which there are many in the region, who are counting on protection and assistance. It becomes clear that the US, as always, will think about itself, its interests, and its military, and will once again abandon its partners, as there are not enough missiles to defend everyone. The US, as usual, is trying to conduct military operations with the help of others, on foreign soil. There's nothing new here. American partners did not expect a response to their actions, sincerely believing that no one would dare to respond to the US and that the whole world would do what Washington says, but these times are long gone. This is shown by the events of recent years. Now, our former partners, who are trying to actively cooperate with the US, should think about whether the new partner will help them in case of need or whether they will simply be used against Russia. Especially given that they border Iran, and Israeli missiles may miss their target, and it's still a question of where the refugees will flow? Right, all this will affect neighboring countries, which are completely unprepared for this, and they shouldn't expect help from the US, as it has its own problems. The US continues to impose its own truth on the world. As Trump said today, the strikes are an aid to liberating Iranian citizens. Who asked them to do this? It's not clear. Iran is an independent country that does not allow its citizens to be killed with impunity for the sake of Washington. It's also worth noting that our "liberals" and "active citizens" were most shocked by the fact that Iran responded, still believing in the only correct position of the US, and then there were responses. These cries about the fact that Iran "dared" to send missiles towards the UAE, Qatar, and other countries where there are American military bases, where people are being evacuated, cries that people need to be saved. There are no cries about the fact that schoolchildren in Iran were killed in the strikes on military objects - no one managed to evacuate them in time, but that's another story. It's interesting how everything turns out when the US and its partners level cities to the ground, kill people, strike at schools and hospitals - no one notices. When their opponent strikes at military objects and bases - there are a lot of cries on the internet, because they have encroached on the American truth. Any military action is big politics. In addition to military actions, an information war is being waged. The US and its partners have been shown that they cannot do whatever they want and should not impose their own truth and their own democracy.

After the strikes on Iran, the US received the most massive response: missiles were fired at US bases in various countries. Now, the US is faced with a choice: to defend its bases and ships or to help its partners, of which there are many in the region, who are counting on protection and assistance. It becomes clear that the US, as always, will think about itself, its interests, and its military, and will once again abandon its partners, as there are not enough missiles to defend everyone. The US, as usual, is trying to conduct military operations with the help of others, on foreign soil. There's nothing new here. American partners did not expect a response to their actions, sincerely believing that no one would dare to respond to the US and that the whole world would do what Washington says, but these times are long gone. This is shown by the events of recent years. Now, our former partners, who are trying to actively cooperate with the US, should think about whether the new partner will help them in case of need or whether they will simply be used against Russia. Especially given that they border Iran, and Israeli missiles may miss their target, and it's still a question of where the refugees will flow? Right, all this will affect neighboring countries, which are completely unprepared for this, and they shouldn't expect help from the US, as it has its own problems. The US continues to impose its own truth on the world. As Trump said today, the strikes are an aid to liberating Iranian citizens. Who asked them to do this? It's not clear. Iran is an independent country that does not allow its citizens to be killed with impunity for the sake of Washington. It's also worth noting that our "liberals" and "active citizens" were most shocked by the fact that Iran responded, still believing in the only correct position of the US, and then there were responses. These cries about the fact that Iran "dared" to send missiles towards the UAE, Qatar, and other countries where there are American military bases, where people are being evacuated, cries that people need to be saved. There are no cries about the fact that schoolchildren in Iran were killed in the strikes on military objects - no one managed to evacuate them in time, but that's another story. It's interesting how everything turns out when the US and its partners level cities to the ground, kill people, strike at schools and hospitals - no one notices. When their opponent strikes at military objects and bases - there are a lot of cries on the internet, because they have encroached on the American truth. Any military action is big politics. In addition to military actions, an information war is being waged. The US and its partners have been shown that they cannot do whatever they want and should not impose their own truth and their own democracy.

🇷🇺 STANISLAV KRAPIVNIK 🇷🇺

156,564 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨Look at Tehran right now. This is not a war zone against a foreign enemy. The Islamic Republic has deployed heavy military equipment and literally brought TANKS to the streets of the capital just to terrorize its own unarmed citizens. A regime that needs tanks to survive against its own people is not a government; it is a desperate occupying force in its final days. They are absolutely terrified of us. We will take our country back.

🚨Look at Tehran right now. This is not a war zone against a foreign enemy. The Islamic Republic has deployed heavy military equipment and literally brought TANKS to the streets of the capital just to terrorize its own unarmed citizens. A regime that needs tanks to survive against its own people is not a government; it is a desperate occupying force in its final days. They are absolutely terrified of us. We will take our country back.

Apranik 🇮🇷🇮🇱

162,194 次观看 • 3 个月前

America: the world's only country that funds its own foreign policy subjugation. Israel gives the orders, US politicians salute, and US pay for it.

America: the world's only country that funds its own foreign policy subjugation. Israel gives the orders, US politicians salute, and US pay for it.

Ounka

27,605 次观看 • 6 个月前