Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Megyn Kelly dropped a 30-second sociopath test on Andrew Schulz that actually works. A man shows up at a funeral, locks eyes with a woman by the casket… then a week later he kills her mother. Why? Normal brains twist for a minute trying to solve it. Sociopaths? They... answer instantly: “So he could see her again.” No hesitation. No moral friction. Just the fastest path. One in four people supposedly tick that box. Andrew breathing a sigh of relief after getting it wrong was pure gold. This isn’t just a party trick, it’s a wild window into how differently some minds are wired. Makes you wonder who you’ve sat next to that sees the world like this. What was your first guess?show more

Camus

462,787 subscribers

1,786,408 views • 2 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Comedy News & Politics Health & Wellness

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

.Andrew Klavan says that Megyn Kelly was wrong to back Tucker and Candace, calling it a “moral mistake.” He points out that their claims are easily falsifiable, and she has the resources to know better. Andrew says (with regret) that she deserves the pushback she’s gotten. He theorizes that she did it to retain the Candace/Tucker share of her audience for her new network. However, he levels this critique with a good dose of grace and humility, reminding the audience that there’s no one on earth who hasn’t made the wrong choice at some point to hang on to something material.

.Andrew Klavan says that Megyn Kelly was wrong to back Tucker and Candace, calling it a “moral mistake.” He points out that their claims are easily falsifiable, and she has the resources to know better. Andrew says (with regret) that she deserves the pushback she’s gotten. He theorizes that she did it to retain the Candace/Tucker share of her audience for her new network. However, he levels this critique with a good dose of grace and humility, reminding the audience that there’s no one on earth who hasn’t made the wrong choice at some point to hang on to something material.

Jackie Chea ⚖️| Agent #13/92

58,656 views • 1 month ago

Omah Lay on the incident at his London show in 2024 when he danced to "Bend You" with a female fan who attended with her boyfriend (Via FADER) 🗣️ — "I was pissed. I was pissed at the guy for a minute. This is a girl who had a chance to be on stage with one of her favorite artists. This is a life-changing opportunity. If I were him, I’d be recording it and being happy for my girl. She’s coming back to you after the song is over! It’s art. It’s one minute max. Why don't you just enjoy it? But he was acting like a victim, like somebody “"took his girl.”" That just shows that you guys don't have anything concrete. I was disappointed in the guy. Like, bro, what are you doing? We’re just dancing in front of 10,000 people. It’s art. Why are you dying over that feeling like a victim?"

Omah Lay on the incident at his London show in 2024 when he danced to "Bend You" with a female fan who attended with her boyfriend (Via FADER) 🗣️ — "I was pissed. I was pissed at the guy for a minute. This is a girl who had a chance to be on stage with one of her favorite artists. This is a life-changing opportunity. If I were him, I’d be recording it and being happy for my girl. She’s coming back to you after the song is over! It’s art. It’s one minute max. Why don't you just enjoy it? But he was acting like a victim, like somebody “"took his girl.”" That just shows that you guys don't have anything concrete. I was disappointed in the guy. Like, bro, what are you doing? We’re just dancing in front of 10,000 people. It’s art. Why are you dying over that feeling like a victim?"

𝗔𝗟𝗕𝗨𝗠 𝗧𝗔𝗟𝗞𝗦 📀

661,364 views • 4 months ago

This man was walking in a parking lot when he sees a woman having a hard time parking her car. He assures her that he can do it for her. So he hops into her car, she even still has her son in it and he decides to back it into the spot for her so it’s easier for her to leave. Would you think twice about giving the keys over to a stranger who claims will park your car for you, even with your child in the car, what would have stopped anyone from just driving off?

This man was walking in a parking lot when he sees a woman having a hard time parking her car. He assures her that he can do it for her. So he hops into her car, she even still has her son in it and he decides to back it into the spot for her so it’s easier for her to leave. Would you think twice about giving the keys over to a stranger who claims will park your car for you, even with your child in the car, what would have stopped anyone from just driving off?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

92,439 views • 4 months ago

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

I genuinely cannot understand how someone can watch this story and still stand there, looking at two women, and somehow decide that the wrong one is the victim. On one side, you have a girl (Yıldız) who has been mistreated her entire life. Since the moment she was born, she was treated like a sacrifice for a conflict she was never even part of and later we find out that this conflict never even existed. Her right to study was taken from her. She was pushed into a marriage at a very young age just imagine being six, seven, eight years old, living in fear of being tied to someone you don’t even know. She was treated like a servant in her own home, by the very people she thought were her family. And just when she gets close to the happiness she dreamed of, the man she was engaged to shows up with another wife. She gets mistreated by that wife, by his family, and even (unintentionally) by him, because he was trying to run away from his own feelings, and that only caused her more heartbreak. The whole world was literally against her. She fought through all of that, only to find out in the end that everything she suffered for was based on something that wasn’t even real. Her entire life was built on a lie. That she isn’t even part of that family that she has literally no one in this world. Now on the other side… You have a girl (Melek) who, yes, was taken from her biological mother but she was raised by loving parents. She had everything anyone could wish for: education, freedom, a happy childhood, a healthy environment. She lived her life, fell in love, went out, made choices and no one questioned her, no one controlled her. And then what did she do? She found out that her man was engaged to another woman before marrying her (and even saw him marry her) and instead of holding on to her dignity, she chose to stay, to fight for a man who lied to her, to hold onto a marriage he tried to end multiple times. She used her unborn child to keep him tied to her. She lied constantly, and her excuse was that she was “protecting her marriage” a marriage that was already broken from the moment Serhat removed that ring at the airport in episode one. She tried to hand Yıldız (a woman who had already suffered enough) over to dangerous people. Then she found out the truth about her own birth (that her father ra*ped her mother.)And still no empathy. No moment of humanity toward her own mother. All she cared about was herself. And even though none of this had anything to do with Yıldız, she still found a way to blame it on her. Instead of holding her father accountable, she went and made a deal with him to get rid of Yıldız. She literally made a deal with the devil just to hurt Yıldız one more time. And after all of that… you want me to feel sorry for her? You want me to call her a victim? I honestly cannot believe we are living on the same planet with people who see this and still say, “she’s the victim.” Not morally. Not logically. Not emotionally. There is no world where this makes sense. It’s like watching someone clearly cause harm, and still calling them the victim and actually BELIEVING it. #HalefKöklerinÇağrısı

Maurora🫦

10,530 views • 5 months ago

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Yes on the videos we have so far. The initial encounter was him filming them. There was no gun being brandished. They jumped out of vehicles to go to try to intimidate him. Unfortunately there's no video yet between then and when they had them on the ground. When they had him on the ground they were pistol whipping him, at first it looked like a baton, but it's actually a gun. They had him down with at least five officers. You got to wait for a second so he tried to stand up they shot him in the back he was motionless after they shot him in the back. Then there were four more shots or more after that unloaded into his body from a posture of standing above him. Not a defensive posture. He's supposedly has a gun. It looks like ICE took something out of a holster. So it's likely that he did have a HOLSTERED GUN in an open carry state that is not a reason to shoot someone to death. He was not brandishing it -- again it was his camera. That was the reason for the initial approach was to intimidate him about his camera. It is perfectly legal to film ice This is out not murder once again. Now there is some sort of speculation on social that a gun was dropped and a bullet went off. That would be the ICE AGENTS who took the gun out of his holster. I'll post some videos for people to see in the order that they happened.

Kristine (@schachin on Threads) 🇺🇦

23,566 views • 7 months ago

This golden retriever was dumped on the street looking like death. Skinny as a rail. Fur falling out in patches from mange. Runny eyes. So thin the woman who found her could wrap one hand around her waist. Most dogs in that shape would have been broken. Birdie walked right up to the people who stopped for her. No fear. No bite. Just trust. They took her in. Treated the mange. Fed her. Gave her a bath that turned the water black. Quarantined her so she wouldn’t spread it. Then one day they let her inside a house for the first time. She didn’t know what to do with herself. Zoomies. Tail going. Pure joy. A few months later that same dog is thick, shiny, and living in a real home with people who actually want her. Some pieces of garbage left her to rot. Good people refused to walk past. That’s the difference. H/t The Dodo and her foster mom Kelsey.

This golden retriever was dumped on the street looking like death. Skinny as a rail. Fur falling out in patches from mange. Runny eyes. So thin the woman who found her could wrap one hand around her waist. Most dogs in that shape would have been broken. Birdie walked right up to the people who stopped for her. No fear. No bite. Just trust. They took her in. Treated the mange. Fed her. Gave her a bath that turned the water black. Quarantined her so she wouldn’t spread it. Then one day they let her inside a house for the first time. She didn’t know what to do with herself. Zoomies. Tail going. Pure joy. A few months later that same dog is thick, shiny, and living in a real home with people who actually want her. Some pieces of garbage left her to rot. Good people refused to walk past. That’s the difference. H/t The Dodo and her foster mom Kelsey.

Michael Mattox - The Mad Ox

71,721 views • 1 month ago

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Issues of paternity have shaped our society for generations, especially in Zimbabwe. They did not start today. I remember going to a funeral with my father in the 1990s, and as we sat around the fire the men began sharing stories. One of them has stayed with me ever since. A Zimbabwean doctor had married a nurse, and they struggled to have children. As usual, when there is no child, the blame was placed on the woman. She went to see her own doctor, who told her plainly that she was not the problem, and advised her to bring her husband for testing. The husband refused, as many Zimbabwean men tend to do. Their marriage eventually collapsed, with the man insisting he could not be the problem because he had a child with another woman before marrying the nurse. That woman, he said, was also a doctor, and he was raising that child. After the divorce, the nurse remarried another doctor, and she immediately fell pregnant. Because it was a tight medical community, the whole situation became a talking point. The ex-husband had loudly declared that his former wife was barren, yet here she was having one child after another, three in total, with her new husband. Meanwhile, the ex-husband remarried, and again there were no children. One day the ex-husband and his former wife met at a gathering. During a casual conversation, as people who once knew each other, she told him directly that he was raising a child who was not his. She told him that he had no capacity to father a child and that if he finally went for tests, he would discover the truth. She reminded him how he had insulted her and her parents, and how he had refused to listen. The revelation shook him. He went for tests, and it was confirmed that he was the problem. He had spent seventeen years looking after a child who was not his. The moral of the story is simple, and I always stress this when mentoring young people. When in doubt, check. In fact, even without doubt, check. A DNA test at birth saves you from future heartbreak. Many men are raising children who are not theirs. Some women know exactly what they are doing. Others genuinely do not know because their relationships overlapped before they settled down. In those cases, even the woman cannot be sure who the father is. So when you have a child, get a DNA test. If you ask for one and a woman becomes defensive or resistant, that is a major red flag. At that point, the test is no longer optional, it is necessary. That is the reality of life today. As they say, trust is beautiful, but DNA is confirmation. In this life we live, hope is not a strategy when it comes to your children, so test your child and protect your future, as the saying goes. I have DNA stories that I could share for a whole year. If compulsory DNA testing was demanded of all of us today, you will be shocked by what will come out. This brother in the video is now going through denial. He has been told the truth, but he is still in shock, which is why he is asking for silly things from this woman. It is hard for any man to discover that the child he believed was his belongs to another man. That is why DNA testing is a necessity and why it should be compulsory.

Hopewell Chin’ono

67,842 views • 9 months ago

A Venezuelan woman who lives in America says she’s a Democrat but is now questioning her own party because they are protesting Trump capturing Nicolas Maduro “You guys are just being so rude. Like, do you know how many deaths this man has? How much blood he has on his hands? And yeah, it was Trump. He got him. Am I super happy it was him? No, but you got to give credit where credit is due. Like he did what no one thought, I wouldn't. I never thought I would live to see this ever. Like I'm in shock. And it makes me sad that you guys are just like saying he was a sovereign president. He wasn't. He was a dictator. He was a dictator. Why don't you take this energy to see who he really was and then come back with your opinions — Just let us have this moment, please.”

A Venezuelan woman who lives in America says she’s a Democrat but is now questioning her own party because they are protesting Trump capturing Nicolas Maduro “You guys are just being so rude. Like, do you know how many deaths this man has? How much blood he has on his hands? And yeah, it was Trump. He got him. Am I super happy it was him? No, but you got to give credit where credit is due. Like he did what no one thought, I wouldn't. I never thought I would live to see this ever. Like I'm in shock. And it makes me sad that you guys are just like saying he was a sovereign president. He wasn't. He was a dictator. He was a dictator. Why don't you take this energy to see who he really was and then come back with your opinions — Just let us have this moment, please.”

Wall Street Apes

68,059 views • 7 months ago

🚨 WOMAN WAS RESCUING SEAGULL, NOT STEALING IT A video I shared yesterday of a woman catching a seagull in a blanket, was Not what it looked like, the woman in question was actually concerned for the small seagull after it has fell off the roof previously, as you can see in this video that the woman in question shares with the seagull society on Facebook, she asked locals to help her it on to a flat roof so it could be back with its mother Like many people yesterday I saw the video shared round of her catching it and jumped to conclusions, for that I apologize and hold my hands up I was quick to judge

🚨 WOMAN WAS RESCUING SEAGULL, NOT STEALING IT A video I shared yesterday of a woman catching a seagull in a blanket, was Not what it looked like, the woman in question was actually concerned for the small seagull after it has fell off the roof previously, as you can see in this video that the woman in question shares with the seagull society on Facebook, she asked locals to help her it on to a flat roof so it could be back with its mother Like many people yesterday I saw the video shared round of her catching it and jumped to conclusions, for that I apologize and hold my hands up I was quick to judge

Active Patriot

1,019,768 views • 1 month ago

I can 100% confirm that Tristan Tate is lying in this clip. Tristan refers to BBC reporting that a woman alleges that Andrew held a gun to her face and threatened her. He suggests that the BBC pulled this out of thin air and can't say who this woman was or when this happened. Some months back, I applied with the Kings Bench for the particulars of the claim of the four woman who are suing Andrew for rape and sexual assault. It very clearly states that this is related to the woman listed as the "first claimant" and took place in early 2015. In his response to the claims, Andrew makes it very clear that he knows exactly who this woman is and gives a detailed recollection of his time with her. These guys are bumbling morons and pathological liars. They could simply say they deny the allegations made against them, but they can't help but spew easily verifiable lies.

I can 100% confirm that Tristan Tate is lying in this clip. Tristan refers to BBC reporting that a woman alleges that Andrew held a gun to her face and threatened her. He suggests that the BBC pulled this out of thin air and can't say who this woman was or when this happened. Some months back, I applied with the Kings Bench for the particulars of the claim of the four woman who are suing Andrew for rape and sexual assault. It very clearly states that this is related to the woman listed as the "first claimant" and took place in early 2015. In his response to the claims, Andrew makes it very clear that he knows exactly who this woman is and gives a detailed recollection of his time with her. These guys are bumbling morons and pathological liars. They could simply say they deny the allegations made against them, but they can't help but spew easily verifiable lies.

Gadget

15,791 views • 1 year ago

This woman was walking down the street, a random man walked by and commented that she has pretty toes. Him saying that upset her and she confronted him about it. He claims it’s her problem if she doesn’t like to be complimented and that he wasn’t doing anything wrong. She shows her feet covered up in a pair of sandals, so I don’t know how his comment comes into play, was he just being nice or was he being a creep?

This woman was walking down the street, a random man walked by and commented that she has pretty toes. Him saying that upset her and she confronted him about it. He claims it’s her problem if she doesn’t like to be complimented and that he wasn’t doing anything wrong. She shows her feet covered up in a pair of sandals, so I don’t know how his comment comes into play, was he just being nice or was he being a creep?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

157,101 views • 4 months ago

Kelly Dodd gets so triggered by her former #RHOC castmates. She went on a rant after claiming Shannon was upset that she had to pay the $500 bill at The Quiet Woman. Kelly argued that Shannon makes $1 million a year and Andy Cohen, who was also there, makes $20 million a year, asking, “Why are they looking for a free meal?” The problem is that Kelly doesn’t have the full story. Andy Cohen later addressed the situation on his radio show, explaining that he was given the bill, happily paid it, and left a generous tip. As he was leaving, the general manager told him the dinner was actually on The Quiet Woman and that they were going to tear up the bill. Andy said he didn’t want that to happen because he wanted the server to receive the tip. In the end, they worked everything out, so the situation wasn’t what Kelly made it out to be. #RHOC

Kelly Dodd gets so triggered by her former #RHOC castmates. She went on a rant after claiming Shannon was upset that she had to pay the $500 bill at The Quiet Woman. Kelly argued that Shannon makes $1 million a year and Andy Cohen, who was also there, makes $20 million a year, asking, “Why are they looking for a free meal?” The problem is that Kelly doesn’t have the full story. Andy Cohen later addressed the situation on his radio show, explaining that he was given the bill, happily paid it, and left a generous tip. As he was leaving, the general manager told him the dinner was actually on The Quiet Woman and that they were going to tear up the bill. Andy said he didn’t want that to happen because he wanted the server to receive the tip. In the end, they worked everything out, so the situation wasn’t what Kelly made it out to be. #RHOC

Bye Wig Hello Drama

92,233 views • 1 month ago

Candace Owens Candace Owens responds to Andrew Kolvet Andrew Kolvet after he posted PROOF on X that she was LYING and gaslighting. Again. Confronted by her own text messages, Candace could no longer deny that she said Erika Kirk murdered Charlie; So…she pivots (by telling another lie) saying, “it was just a joke… I stand by it… I still think it’s funny…” Then, just like she did with Laura Loomer (and anyone who dares to confront her), Candace attacks Andrew- calls him a “narcissist” that “abuses the public” and then “jokes” that he’s gay.

Candace Owens Candace Owens responds to Andrew Kolvet Andrew Kolvet after he posted PROOF on X that she was LYING and gaslighting. Again. Confronted by her own text messages, Candace could no longer deny that she said Erika Kirk murdered Charlie; So…she pivots (by telling another lie) saying, “it was just a joke… I stand by it… I still think it’s funny…” Then, just like she did with Laura Loomer (and anyone who dares to confront her), Candace attacks Andrew- calls him a “narcissist” that “abuses the public” and then “jokes” that he’s gay.

Ally

102,075 views • 4 months ago

Elon Musk was called a racist on camera by the editor-in-chief of The Economist. An accusation that serious should have come with proof. Hers came from no one. Zanny Minton Beddoes: “People say that you’re a racist.” People say. No evidence. No incident. No source. No name. “People say” removes the journalist’s fingerprints from the accusation. Nothing to verify. No one to hold accountable. A label laundered through a question so it can never be traced back to a fact. Musk: “My partner is half Indian. I have four children with her. One of them was named after a famous Indian physicist. If you look at the people employed at my companies, we have senior executives of all races.” The accusation cost nothing to make. The defense required a man to put his own family on the table. Then she moved on. No pause. Not one word of his answer made it into the next question. Beddoes: “Are you anti-Muslim?” The first accusation was still on the ground. The next was already in the air. Musk: “I’m against people coming to a country with antithetical views. I’m against rape and murder. I’m against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we’ve come to accept in the West.” He answered with positions no functioning society disputes. The only way to make them sound like bigotry was to attach a religion to the people he was describing. That isn’t journalism. It’s a trap where the question does the accusing and the answer does the rest. Musk: “I think it’s a crying shame that the traditional media, like you, don’t recognize this.” To her face. To the editor-in-chief of one of the most powerful publications on Earth. When a man has to prove he isn’t a racist by naming his own children, then defend himself for opposing rape and murder, the labels have stopped describing the world. They’ve started building one. The accusation was never meant to be true. It was meant to be answered. Because the moment you’re defending yourself against a label, the label has already done its work. And when no answer can acquit you, you were never being accused. You were being sentenced. The presumption of innocence was never a description of how people think. It was a wall built against it. Four centuries putting it up. A decade taking it down. Musk didn’t accept the frame. He answered with facts and let the accusations collapse on contact, then told the person holding the microphone that she was the problem. The weapon only works on people who flinch. He didn’t. And the accusation that came from no one finally had a name on it. Hers.

Elon Musk was called a racist on camera by the editor-in-chief of The Economist. An accusation that serious should have come with proof. Hers came from no one. Zanny Minton Beddoes: “People say that you’re a racist.” People say. No evidence. No incident. No source. No name. “People say” removes the journalist’s fingerprints from the accusation. Nothing to verify. No one to hold accountable. A label laundered through a question so it can never be traced back to a fact. Musk: “My partner is half Indian. I have four children with her. One of them was named after a famous Indian physicist. If you look at the people employed at my companies, we have senior executives of all races.” The accusation cost nothing to make. The defense required a man to put his own family on the table. Then she moved on. No pause. Not one word of his answer made it into the next question. Beddoes: “Are you anti-Muslim?” The first accusation was still on the ground. The next was already in the air. Musk: “I’m against people coming to a country with antithetical views. I’m against rape and murder. I’m against the imposition of rules and laws that are contrary to what we’ve come to accept in the West.” He answered with positions no functioning society disputes. The only way to make them sound like bigotry was to attach a religion to the people he was describing. That isn’t journalism. It’s a trap where the question does the accusing and the answer does the rest. Musk: “I think it’s a crying shame that the traditional media, like you, don’t recognize this.” To her face. To the editor-in-chief of one of the most powerful publications on Earth. When a man has to prove he isn’t a racist by naming his own children, then defend himself for opposing rape and murder, the labels have stopped describing the world. They’ve started building one. The accusation was never meant to be true. It was meant to be answered. Because the moment you’re defending yourself against a label, the label has already done its work. And when no answer can acquit you, you were never being accused. You were being sentenced. The presumption of innocence was never a description of how people think. It was a wall built against it. Four centuries putting it up. A decade taking it down. Musk didn’t accept the frame. He answered with facts and let the accusations collapse on contact, then told the person holding the microphone that she was the problem. The weapon only works on people who flinch. He didn’t. And the accusation that came from no one finally had a name on it. Hers.

Dustin

367,832 views • 1 month ago

Andrew Gallimore: "Some people are getting banned from the DMT realm" "Mantis beings are even punching people in the face" He told AJ from The Why Files how one person described a mantis being punching a user in the face right as they entered the space. The punch was felt and the entire experience ended instantly. The user snapped back to baseline consciousness with the effects just gone like that. People report getting a big X in their field of vision that says no entry. Or an entity that wags its finger and says no no no. Or a clear message that you are not welcome here and we are not letting you in. This is called a lockout. It can last for months or years. Unlike normal tolerance that builds gradually this functions like an on off switch with no straightforward pharmacological explanation. These consistent accounts from regular DMT users continue to raise deep questions about what is actually encountered in that space.

Andrew Gallimore: "Some people are getting banned from the DMT realm" "Mantis beings are even punching people in the face" He told AJ from The Why Files how one person described a mantis being punching a user in the face right as they entered the space. The punch was felt and the entire experience ended instantly. The user snapped back to baseline consciousness with the effects just gone like that. People report getting a big X in their field of vision that says no entry. Or an entity that wags its finger and says no no no. Or a clear message that you are not welcome here and we are not letting you in. This is called a lockout. It can last for months or years. Unlike normal tolerance that builds gradually this functions like an on off switch with no straightforward pharmacological explanation. These consistent accounts from regular DMT users continue to raise deep questions about what is actually encountered in that space.

Interstellar

247,915 views • 2 months ago

This woman called for an Uber so that she could go and visit her friend, when the Uber showed up, it wasn’t the one in the picture on the app, but it can’t be a coincidence that it was this one that showed up. A moment before it showed up, a man walked by, and seemed to circle her, once the fake Uber showed up, the man who circled her tried to force her into the car, she managed to fight them off and got away. Could the actual Uber that she was assigned to in the app have been involved in this, how else would could this have happened?

This woman called for an Uber so that she could go and visit her friend, when the Uber showed up, it wasn’t the one in the picture on the app, but it can’t be a coincidence that it was this one that showed up. A moment before it showed up, a man walked by, and seemed to circle her, once the fake Uber showed up, the man who circled her tried to force her into the car, she managed to fight them off and got away. Could the actual Uber that she was assigned to in the app have been involved in this, how else would could this have happened?

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

1,004,161 views • 7 months ago

A men had eight acres… and instead of building a massive house, he did something no one expected. He went to Home Depot, bought a simple shed, and turned it into his entire home. Not temporary, intentional. Then he added a pool. A trampoline. Space, freedom, and a setup that looked simple on the outside… but completely different from what people imagine “success” should look like. At first, people laughed. A shed? Really? But the more you look at it, the more it flips the script. No huge mortgage. No overwhelming maintenance. Just land, privacy, and a lifestyle he actually chose. It’s not flashy, but it’s his. And somehow, that makes it feel bigger than a house ever could. Now everyone’s asking the same thing; is this crazy… or kind of genius? Sometimes the best life isn’t the biggest one; it’s the one that actually works for you. If you had the land to do this… would you build a traditional house, or take a risk and live completely differently?

A men had eight acres… and instead of building a massive house, he did something no one expected. He went to Home Depot, bought a simple shed, and turned it into his entire home. Not temporary, intentional. Then he added a pool. A trampoline. Space, freedom, and a setup that looked simple on the outside… but completely different from what people imagine “success” should look like. At first, people laughed. A shed? Really? But the more you look at it, the more it flips the script. No huge mortgage. No overwhelming maintenance. Just land, privacy, and a lifestyle he actually chose. It’s not flashy, but it’s his. And somehow, that makes it feel bigger than a house ever could. Now everyone’s asking the same thing; is this crazy… or kind of genius? Sometimes the best life isn’t the biggest one; it’s the one that actually works for you. If you had the land to do this… would you build a traditional house, or take a risk and live completely differently?

Dr.L

991,572 views • 4 months ago

🔥🤔 YOU CANT UNSEE IT. JAMES TALARICO IS A TROJAN HORSE. Does this sounds like a “Christian to any of you” “I HESITATE BEFORE TELLING SOMEONE IM A CHRISTIAN. THERE IS A CANCER ON OUR RELIGION” - James Talarico the Texas Senate candidate Obama likely handpicked. What if I told you he told Joe Rogan that the bible mentioning men laying with each other being an abomination in the Bible may just be a EUPHEMISM. What if I told you he loves Trans kids sticking up for their “rights”? What if he is obsessed with telling people Jesus never discussed GAY MARRIAGE? What if I told you he was a theater kid growing up? What I told you that on Obama’s podcast with Maron he went out of his way to mention Talarico? Ever wonder who is close to Colbert that arranged for that controversial Talarico interview? Why would a Christian say “Christian Nationalism kills? “ Who else do know that used to make references to IMPERIALISM? Ever wonder why James Talarico never once discussed having girlfriend until a day after people questioned it? The ONLY mention of having a girlfriend was installed in an a news article BY HIS TEAM who claimed he dated the prom queen. Isn’t that odd? Anyone ever track her down? Wonder why he did the seemingly NEXT DAY podcast in LA with a woman who interview Michelle multiple times? Who else was in LA that day ? Michelle. Obama was in Texas with Talarico campaigning for him. Why is Talarico so important to Obama? Does he see this as a pet project to finally turn a Texas seat blue? What are Talarico’s true colors and nature? For such a Christian he sure does seem to be a paradox. Are we ever going to meet this girlfriend of his that manifested of thin air??

🔥🤔 YOU CANT UNSEE IT. JAMES TALARICO IS A TROJAN HORSE. Does this sounds like a “Christian to any of you” “I HESITATE BEFORE TELLING SOMEONE IM A CHRISTIAN. THERE IS A CANCER ON OUR RELIGION” - James Talarico the Texas Senate candidate Obama likely handpicked. What if I told you he told Joe Rogan that the bible mentioning men laying with each other being an abomination in the Bible may just be a EUPHEMISM. What if I told you he loves Trans kids sticking up for their “rights”? What if he is obsessed with telling people Jesus never discussed GAY MARRIAGE? What if I told you he was a theater kid growing up? What I told you that on Obama’s podcast with Maron he went out of his way to mention Talarico? Ever wonder who is close to Colbert that arranged for that controversial Talarico interview? Why would a Christian say “Christian Nationalism kills? “ Who else do know that used to make references to IMPERIALISM? Ever wonder why James Talarico never once discussed having girlfriend until a day after people questioned it? The ONLY mention of having a girlfriend was installed in an a news article BY HIS TEAM who claimed he dated the prom queen. Isn’t that odd? Anyone ever track her down? Wonder why he did the seemingly NEXT DAY podcast in LA with a woman who interview Michelle multiple times? Who else was in LA that day ? Michelle. Obama was in Texas with Talarico campaigning for him. Why is Talarico so important to Obama? Does he see this as a pet project to finally turn a Texas seat blue? What are Talarico’s true colors and nature? For such a Christian he sure does seem to be a paradox. Are we ever going to meet this girlfriend of his that manifested of thin air??

Johnny St.Pete

58,840 views • 3 months ago

Savannah was filming a short video in front of a mirror to celebrate her 2nd anniversary. At first, everything looked completely normal... calm, happy, nothing unusual. But then something chilling happened. In the background, a dark, human-like shadow suddenly moved from one room to another. It was there for just a split second-but it was enough to make Savannah freeze. Shocked, she quickly went to check the room... but no one was there. Confused and scared, she turned to her husband and asked, "Did you see that?" He looked at her, completely puzzled, and said he didn't notice anything at all. So what was it? What do you think about this? Could it have been a ghost... a jinn... or something even more terrifying?

Sensitive content

Savannah was filming a short video in front of a mirror to celebrate her 2nd anniversary. At first, everything looked completely normal... calm, happy, nothing unusual. But then something chilling happened. In the background, a dark, human-like shadow suddenly moved from one room to another. It was there for just a split second-but it was enough to make Savannah freeze. Shocked, she quickly went to check the room... but no one was there. Confused and scared, she turned to her husband and asked, "Did you see that?" He looked at her, completely puzzled, and said he didn't notice anything at all. So what was it? What do you think about this? Could it have been a ghost... a jinn... or something even more terrifying?

iamtobitheboss

205,653 views • 4 months ago

Public Service Announcement: We Will Be Relentless Megyn Kelly! It is so ironic that Megyn Kelly artfully dissects the left's hypocrisy but is blind to her own failings. We are not harassing MK but pointing out the error of her ways! Oh by way, Carlson was summoned to the White House to address his rhetoric. Why did he not state this fact? As a Catholic Megyn Kelly, you would benefit from a consultation with your Priest, or maybe just maybe, open a Bible, or a history book! But no that is to much to ask for the propagandist actress. It is so ironic that Megyn Kelly artfully dissects the left hypocrisy but is blind to her own failings.

Public Service Announcement: We Will Be Relentless Megyn Kelly! It is so ironic that Megyn Kelly artfully dissects the left's hypocrisy but is blind to her own failings. We are not harassing MK but pointing out the error of her ways! Oh by way, Carlson was summoned to the White House to address his rhetoric. Why did he not state this fact? As a Catholic Megyn Kelly, you would benefit from a consultation with your Priest, or maybe just maybe, open a Bible, or a history book! But no that is to much to ask for the propagandist actress. It is so ironic that Megyn Kelly artfully dissects the left hypocrisy but is blind to her own failings.

Andrea Shaffer, Anti-Marxist Warrior

29,392 views • 6 months ago