Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Mehdi Hasan can’t stop lying. He just lied on air that Israel’s nuclear program is bound by UN Security Council Resolution 487 under Chapter VII, the only framework that creates binding enforcement. Resolution 487 literally does not invoke “Chapter VII”. You know which does? Resolution 1737, which requires the...

DoronSpielman's profile picture

Doron Spielman

12,015 subscribers

216,826 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 "Iran now wants to have nukes because of Israel and America." Mehdi Hasan just DESTROYED the Israeli spokesperson on Piers Morgan Uncensored. He flipped the entire narrative: Israel is the only country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons Israel bombed six countries last year Yet the West acts like Iran is the existential threat? "The problem is Israel, not Iran." This is the most savage, fact-packed takedown of the double standard in years. The logic is brutal and undeniable.
1:17

🚨 "Iran now wants to have nukes because of Israel and America." Mehdi Hasan just DESTROYED the Israeli spokesperson on Piers Morgan Uncensored. He flipped the entire narrative: Israel is the only country in the Middle East with nuclear weapons Israel bombed six countries last year Yet the West acts like Iran is the existential threat? "The problem is Israel, not Iran." This is the most savage, fact-packed takedown of the double standard in years. The logic is brutal and undeniable.

Masu Zafi 🔥🔥

78,573 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

In this exchange, Mehdi Hasan laid out the facts. The JCPOA limited Iran to 3.67% enrichment. Israel and the Trump administration destroyed that deal. Iran then enriched to 20%, then 60%. Hasan then asked Doron Spielman: 'What enriched uranium does Israel have? The IAEA isn't allowed into Israel.' Doron had no answer. Instead, he called Hasan 'morally insane.' This is the standard Israeli response Israel has an undeclared nuclear arsenal. Iran does not. And Israel sabotaged the very agreement that prevented Iran from advancing its program
0:50

In this exchange, Mehdi Hasan laid out the facts. The JCPOA limited Iran to 3.67% enrichment. Israel and the Trump administration destroyed that deal. Iran then enriched to 20%, then 60%. Hasan then asked Doron Spielman: 'What enriched uranium does Israel have? The IAEA isn't allowed into Israel.' Doron had no answer. Instead, he called Hasan 'morally insane.' This is the standard Israeli response Israel has an undeclared nuclear arsenal. Iran does not. And Israel sabotaged the very agreement that prevented Iran from advancing its program

Ounka

13,246 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🇵🇸🇺🇸 "THAT LAST UN SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ON OCTOBER 17, LITERALLY GAVE THE DEED OF GAZA TO TRUMP" Norman Finkelstein argues that if Saudi Arabia fully joined the Abraham Accords, Gaza would basically be abandoned by the wider Arab world. In his view, a later UN Security Council resolution (backed by many Arab and Muslim governments) already signaled “the end of Gaza” and, he claims, effectively handed control of Gaza’s fate to Trump. He says that resolution mainly existed to give Saudi Arabia political cover to go to Washington, visit the White House, and sign onto a bigger Abraham Accords deal, leaving Gaza with no real defenders left. "[If Saudi Arabia joined the Abraham Accords] there would no longer be any incentive anywhere in the Arab world to do anything for Gaza. The first thing that happened is they signed a resolution, which is the end of Gaza. The UN, and virtually every Arab Muslim state, signed on. That last resolution on 17 October 2025, UN Security Council Resolution, literally gave the deed of Gaza to Trump. It gave him the deed to Gaza. It’s over." Norman Finkelstein
1:58

🇵🇸🇺🇸 "THAT LAST UN SECURITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ON OCTOBER 17, LITERALLY GAVE THE DEED OF GAZA TO TRUMP" Norman Finkelstein argues that if Saudi Arabia fully joined the Abraham Accords, Gaza would basically be abandoned by the wider Arab world. In his view, a later UN Security Council resolution (backed by many Arab and Muslim governments) already signaled “the end of Gaza” and, he claims, effectively handed control of Gaza’s fate to Trump. He says that resolution mainly existed to give Saudi Arabia political cover to go to Washington, visit the White House, and sign onto a bigger Abraham Accords deal, leaving Gaza with no real defenders left. "[If Saudi Arabia joined the Abraham Accords] there would no longer be any incentive anywhere in the Arab world to do anything for Gaza. The first thing that happened is they signed a resolution, which is the end of Gaza. The UN, and virtually every Arab Muslim state, signed on. That last resolution on 17 October 2025, UN Security Council Resolution, literally gave the deed of Gaza to Trump. It gave him the deed to Gaza. It’s over." Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

18,982 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Bakaei at a press conference: 🔺The fact that some European countries are with the Zionist regime and are ready to negotiate with Iran is a contradiction for which they must answer. Two of the three countries are members of the Security Council. They are also members of the JCPOA, and it is valid. 🔺If they valued the JCPOA, they should have condemned the regime's crime. Iran's nuclear program is the only program in the world that is legal under a Security Council resolution. These facilities are now being violated, and this is a blow to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. We expect them to focus all their efforts on stopping the violation and condemning the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
2:12

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Bakaei at a press conference: 🔺The fact that some European countries are with the Zionist regime and are ready to negotiate with Iran is a contradiction for which they must answer. Two of the three countries are members of the Security Council. They are also members of the JCPOA, and it is valid. 🔺If they valued the JCPOA, they should have condemned the regime's crime. Iran's nuclear program is the only program in the world that is legal under a Security Council resolution. These facilities are now being violated, and this is a blow to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. We expect them to focus all their efforts on stopping the violation and condemning the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.

Sprinter Observer

81,837 просмотров • 1 год назад

⭕️ U.S. and Gulf Allies Push UN Security Council Resolution Threatening Sanctions on Iran Over Hormuz The U.S. and Gulf allies have introduced a draft UN Security Council resolution threatening Iran with sanctions or other measures if it does not: ▪️ Immediately stop all strikes on commercial and merchant shipping. ▪️Stop imposing what the resolution calls “illegal tolls” ▪️ Reveal the placement and number of sea mines to allow for safe navigation and removal ▪️ Participate in and enable U.N. efforts to establish a safe passage for aid, fertilizer, and other essential goods. The resolution is co-sponsored by Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar, and is drafted under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter — meaning it could ultimately be enforced militarily. Rubio called the vote a “real test” for the UN. He also acknowledged uncertainty over whether adjustments to the text would be enough to avoid a Chinese or Russian veto. A previous Hormuz resolution was vetoed by both countries in April.
1:57

⭕️ U.S. and Gulf Allies Push UN Security Council Resolution Threatening Sanctions on Iran Over Hormuz The U.S. and Gulf allies have introduced a draft UN Security Council resolution threatening Iran with sanctions or other measures if it does not: ▪️ Immediately stop all strikes on commercial and merchant shipping. ▪️Stop imposing what the resolution calls “illegal tolls” ▪️ Reveal the placement and number of sea mines to allow for safe navigation and removal ▪️ Participate in and enable U.N. efforts to establish a safe passage for aid, fertilizer, and other essential goods. The resolution is co-sponsored by Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, and Qatar, and is drafted under Chapter 7 of the UN Charter — meaning it could ultimately be enforced militarily. Rubio called the vote a “real test” for the UN. He also acknowledged uncertainty over whether adjustments to the text would be enough to avoid a Chinese or Russian veto. A previous Hormuz resolution was vetoed by both countries in April.

Drop Site

25,510 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

⚡️ Iran’s chief wartime negotiator and Speaker of Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf: Enrichment is our legitimate right. Offensive power and missile capability are absolutely non-negotiable. Iran will continue to adhere to NPT regulations. 🔹Ghalibaf said Iran “must seriously pursue” the talks and the memorandum of understanding, calling it “our document of pride.” 🔹He pointed to Clause 14 of the memorandum, which requires a UN Security Council resolution, but questioned what guarantees such approval provides, arguing that President Trump ignored a UN resolution in 2017 and that the UN failed to condemn recent attacks on Iran. 🔹”Domestic strength and a strong position on the ground are the only real guarantees for the country,” he said. 🔹 Iran’s missile capabilities will remain off the negotiating table. 🔹Ghalibaf also said Iran is not negotiating with any party over its allies in the “Axis of Resistance,” saying that the U.S. now recognizes the resistance front in Lebanon and elsewhere as “an undeniable reality.” 🔹On Iran’s nuclear program, he said Tehran will continue to comply with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), while reiterating that uranium enrichment is Iran’s “legitimate right.”
2:47

⚡️ Iran’s chief wartime negotiator and Speaker of Parliament, Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf: Enrichment is our legitimate right. Offensive power and missile capability are absolutely non-negotiable. Iran will continue to adhere to NPT regulations. 🔹Ghalibaf said Iran “must seriously pursue” the talks and the memorandum of understanding, calling it “our document of pride.” 🔹He pointed to Clause 14 of the memorandum, which requires a UN Security Council resolution, but questioned what guarantees such approval provides, arguing that President Trump ignored a UN resolution in 2017 and that the UN failed to condemn recent attacks on Iran. 🔹”Domestic strength and a strong position on the ground are the only real guarantees for the country,” he said. 🔹 Iran’s missile capabilities will remain off the negotiating table. 🔹Ghalibaf also said Iran is not negotiating with any party over its allies in the “Axis of Resistance,” saying that the U.S. now recognizes the resistance front in Lebanon and elsewhere as “an undeniable reality.” 🔹On Iran’s nuclear program, he said Tehran will continue to comply with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), while reiterating that uranium enrichment is Iran’s “legitimate right.”

Drop Site

17,002 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Mehdi Hasan: A million people displaced from their homes by Israel Doron Spielman: If we don't displace them, then I go on this show and we're accused of killing civilians, right? And if we do displace them - then we're accused of displacement. Mehdi Hasan: You, you told them they can't come back - Don't gaslight us. You've told them they can't come back. That means it's ethnic cleansing Doron Spielman: Mehdi Hasan, I have one question for you. Does Israel have a right to respond to Hezbollah after they shot 6,000 rockets at us unprovoked in, on October 8th, 2023, one day after October 7th? Do we have a right to respond? Mehdi Hasan: Any country has a right to defend itself. Of course it does - Does Lebanon have a right to defend itself - from Israeli invasion? - Doron, you al- you always start these timelines, you start these timelines in weird places. You say 2014, ignoring what happened in 2015. You say October 8th, 2023. You ignore what happened in 2024, Doron. Let me remind the viewers of Piers Uncensored, there was a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah since the end of 2024. According to the UN, according to UN peacekeepers that Israel keeps attacking, you keep attacking Irish, and Nepalese, and, uh, Indonesian peacekeepers. The Is- UN peacekeepers in Southern Lebanon say Israel violated the ceasefire not 1,000 times, not 5,000 times. They say you violated the ceasefire 15,000 times over the last 18 months. So please don't come and tell me about unprovoked rockets. Doron Spielman: I don't know about your numbers. Mehdi Hasan: Well, you can Google is your friend, okay?
1:37

Mehdi Hasan: A million people displaced from their homes by Israel Doron Spielman: If we don't displace them, then I go on this show and we're accused of killing civilians, right? And if we do displace them - then we're accused of displacement. Mehdi Hasan: You, you told them they can't come back - Don't gaslight us. You've told them they can't come back. That means it's ethnic cleansing Doron Spielman: Mehdi Hasan, I have one question for you. Does Israel have a right to respond to Hezbollah after they shot 6,000 rockets at us unprovoked in, on October 8th, 2023, one day after October 7th? Do we have a right to respond? Mehdi Hasan: Any country has a right to defend itself. Of course it does - Does Lebanon have a right to defend itself - from Israeli invasion? - Doron, you al- you always start these timelines, you start these timelines in weird places. You say 2014, ignoring what happened in 2015. You say October 8th, 2023. You ignore what happened in 2024, Doron. Let me remind the viewers of Piers Uncensored, there was a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah since the end of 2024. According to the UN, according to UN peacekeepers that Israel keeps attacking, you keep attacking Irish, and Nepalese, and, uh, Indonesian peacekeepers. The Is- UN peacekeepers in Southern Lebanon say Israel violated the ceasefire not 1,000 times, not 5,000 times. They say you violated the ceasefire 15,000 times over the last 18 months. So please don't come and tell me about unprovoked rockets. Doron Spielman: I don't know about your numbers. Mehdi Hasan: Well, you can Google is your friend, okay?

Ounka

115,666 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

“Is there a UN charter for Israel that is different than the charter we all have? Do they have a right to kill, and the only right we have is to die? What the hell more does Israel need to do more for this council to act under Chapter VII … or will this Council be the last place on earth that cannot recognize a threat to peace when they see it. When it is so glaring, so undeniable? You are witnessing an attempt to annihilate a nation.” —Palestinian Deputy Ambassador to the UN (Ambassador Majed Bamya 🇵🇸) calls out global complicity after the United States blocked yet another ceasefire resolution that would have put an end to the genocide in Gaza.
2:14

“Is there a UN charter for Israel that is different than the charter we all have? Do they have a right to kill, and the only right we have is to die? What the hell more does Israel need to do more for this council to act under Chapter VII … or will this Council be the last place on earth that cannot recognize a threat to peace when they see it. When it is so glaring, so undeniable? You are witnessing an attempt to annihilate a nation.” —Palestinian Deputy Ambassador to the UN (Ambassador Majed Bamya 🇵🇸) calls out global complicity after the United States blocked yet another ceasefire resolution that would have put an end to the genocide in Gaza.

Drop Site

56,093 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein
2:47

🚨🇵🇸 “THE UN RESOLUTION IS A DEATH WARRANT FOR GAZA” Norman Finkelstein accuses Egypt, Turkey, Qatar, and even the Palestinian Authority, of backing a UN resolution that hands Gaza to Trump under the guise of peace. He argues they had a choice: stop the war and speak the truth, or seal the deal that dooms Gaza’s future. “The Trump peace plan and then the UN resolution, that was negotiated by Egypt, Turkey and Qatar, they all supported handing Gaza over to Trump. They had an alternative [though], an alternative of telling the truth. You could say: ‘We signed on to this resolution because we wanted to stop the war. However, we recognize that this resolution is a death warrant for Gaza. We recognize it.’ There was no gun put to your head. The Russians, when they abstained, and also the Chinese when they abstained. You know what they said? ‘We wanted to exercise our veto, but we had no choice because all the Arab states said they supported the resolution.’ And then you know what happened? The Palestinian Authority said, ‘We welcome the resolution.’ So the Russian delegation's last words were, ‘Don't say we didn't warn you.’ And that's a fact.” Norman Finkelstein

Mario Nawfal

13,901 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

The Trump administration signing a nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia while simultaneously fighting a war, which they claim is to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is peak Western hypocrisy. What’s really going on here is the US government is serving the interests of capital as this multi-billion-dollar deal establishes a framework for American corporations and billionaires to get rich off developing Saudi Arabia’s nuclear infrastructure. So why can Saudi Arabia (and Israel) have nukes but Iran can’t? Because Iran is one of the only countries in the region that actually resists US imperialism and Israeli genocide. It’s also important to point out that Iran was not close to obtaining a nuke. That’s just the lie they used to sell this war, which is also the same lie they used to sell the Iraq war. Now here’s most ironic part of all of this: If you actually want peace in the region (and world) then Iran should have a nuclear weapon because it is the only thing that will deter the United States and Israel from waging endless wars in the Middle East to steal oil and land as they have been doing for decades now.
1:52

The Trump administration signing a nuclear deal with Saudi Arabia while simultaneously fighting a war, which they claim is to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is peak Western hypocrisy. What’s really going on here is the US government is serving the interests of capital as this multi-billion-dollar deal establishes a framework for American corporations and billionaires to get rich off developing Saudi Arabia’s nuclear infrastructure. So why can Saudi Arabia (and Israel) have nukes but Iran can’t? Because Iran is one of the only countries in the region that actually resists US imperialism and Israeli genocide. It’s also important to point out that Iran was not close to obtaining a nuke. That’s just the lie they used to sell this war, which is also the same lie they used to sell the Iraq war. Now here’s most ironic part of all of this: If you actually want peace in the region (and world) then Iran should have a nuclear weapon because it is the only thing that will deter the United States and Israel from waging endless wars in the Middle East to steal oil and land as they have been doing for decades now.

Power to the People ☭🕊

15,939 просмотров • 17 дней назад

You tell me, does this guy sound like a legitimate doctor, or a lying fraud? First, he confidently tries to lie to me, saying he’s “NEVER” been suspended in South Africa and that he has his “FULL LICENSE” there. But little does he know, I’ve actually been to South Africa and spoken to the medical board, which confirmed he is, in fact, SUSPENDED. So he changes his story: “I suspended myself because I don’t work there anymore.” Fun fact: You can’t suspend yourself. It’s an adverse regulatory action, and no legitimate doctor would ever want that on their record...
0:28

You tell me, does this guy sound like a legitimate doctor, or a lying fraud? First, he confidently tries to lie to me, saying he’s “NEVER” been suspended in South Africa and that he has his “FULL LICENSE” there. But little does he know, I’ve actually been to South Africa and spoken to the medical board, which confirmed he is, in fact, SUSPENDED. So he changes his story: “I suspended myself because I don’t work there anymore.” Fun fact: You can’t suspend yourself. It’s an adverse regulatory action, and no legitimate doctor would ever want that on their record...

Mocha Bezirgan 🇨🇦

42,335 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Sec. Rubio on Iran talks: "There's been some slight progress. I don't want to exaggerate it, but there's been a little bit of movement." - The core U.S. demands remain unchanged: no nuclear weapons, address enrichment, address highly enriched uranium, and resolve the Strait - Rubio confirms Iran is trying to create a permanent tolling system for the Strait and is actively lobbying Oman to join - "There is not a country in the world that should accept that. I don't know of a country in the world that's in favor of it except Iran" - The U.S. is backing a UN Security Council resolution sponsored by Bahrain that Rubio says has the highest number of co-sponsors of any resolution ever before the Council
0:46

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Sec. Rubio on Iran talks: "There's been some slight progress. I don't want to exaggerate it, but there's been a little bit of movement." - The core U.S. demands remain unchanged: no nuclear weapons, address enrichment, address highly enriched uranium, and resolve the Strait - Rubio confirms Iran is trying to create a permanent tolling system for the Strait and is actively lobbying Oman to join - "There is not a country in the world that should accept that. I don't know of a country in the world that's in favor of it except Iran" - The U.S. is backing a UN Security Council resolution sponsored by Bahrain that Rubio says has the highest number of co-sponsors of any resolution ever before the Council

Mario Nawfal

414,824 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

MEHDI HASAN RIPS APART ELON-BACKED ISLAMOPHOBIC PROPAGANDA 🔥 PIERS MORGAN: What did Elon Musk say to you? DIRECTOR: We exchanged messages. He liked what he saw and asked if we could run the film on X. MEHDI: Your film says it is against criminals, not Muslims. Then why does your hero kill an entire migrant family? DIRECTOR: The son was a rapist. When rapists are not jailed, people develop vigilante fantasies. MEHDI: But he kills the whole family. That is the point. You should condemn it. DIRECTOR: People are fed up with the situation. MEHDI 🎯: People are angry about Jeffrey Epstein too. Should they kill Donald Trump and Republicans? Obviously not.
2:31

MEHDI HASAN RIPS APART ELON-BACKED ISLAMOPHOBIC PROPAGANDA 🔥 PIERS MORGAN: What did Elon Musk say to you? DIRECTOR: We exchanged messages. He liked what he saw and asked if we could run the film on X. MEHDI: Your film says it is against criminals, not Muslims. Then why does your hero kill an entire migrant family? DIRECTOR: The son was a rapist. When rapists are not jailed, people develop vigilante fantasies. MEHDI: But he kills the whole family. That is the point. You should condemn it. DIRECTOR: People are fed up with the situation. MEHDI 🎯: People are angry about Jeffrey Epstein too. Should they kill Donald Trump and Republicans? Obviously not.

Mr Sharma

43,663 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The German Chancellor confirmed this evening that Germany has submitted a formal request to the United Nations to trigger the snapback mechanism against Iran on July 15, just two days from now. The snapback mechanism is a tool included in a UN Security Council resolution that allows any of the countries that signed the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) to automatically reinstate all international sanctions that were lifted under the agreement, in the event of a serious violation by Iran. If the request is approved (and there’s no reason it wouldn’t be), all relief granted to Iran under the 2015 nuclear deal will be revoked. This includes the arms embargo, economic restrictions, space-related bans, access to the global financial system, and more.
0:45

The German Chancellor confirmed this evening that Germany has submitted a formal request to the United Nations to trigger the snapback mechanism against Iran on July 15, just two days from now. The snapback mechanism is a tool included in a UN Security Council resolution that allows any of the countries that signed the Iran nuclear deal (JCPOA) to automatically reinstate all international sanctions that were lifted under the agreement, in the event of a serious violation by Iran. If the request is approved (and there’s no reason it wouldn’t be), all relief granted to Iran under the 2015 nuclear deal will be revoked. This includes the arms embargo, economic restrictions, space-related bans, access to the global financial system, and more.

Open Source Intel

364,177 просмотров • 1 год назад

Twitch Streamer Hasan Piker rants about how he does more research than Political Streamer Destiny. He also backtracks his positive stance on a Ta-Nehisi Quotes x account because they said Hasan does less research, prompting the rant. Hasan Piker claims not to know what or who a snarker is, but the Dickers and Aiden debate that destiny had is briefly mentioned. Hasan states that he has a decade of research, and that's the reason why he is a better researcher than Destiny. Hasan calls Destiny's audience biased when, in reality, his audience is just as biased. Hasan states that he is entertaining with his political coverage, and other political streamers make it about drama. When in reality, Hasan is more than happy to rant about other streamers and " drama sloptubers" on stream as well. He also states that people are getting duped by his political takes because he is being clipped, and that people are basing their reasoning on the clip rather than watching the full stream. Hasan then makes comparisons to Ben Shapiro on one of Destiny's takes and states that Destiny is constantly undermining him.
13:43

Twitch Streamer Hasan Piker rants about how he does more research than Political Streamer Destiny. He also backtracks his positive stance on a Ta-Nehisi Quotes x account because they said Hasan does less research, prompting the rant. Hasan Piker claims not to know what or who a snarker is, but the Dickers and Aiden debate that destiny had is briefly mentioned. Hasan states that he has a decade of research, and that's the reason why he is a better researcher than Destiny. Hasan calls Destiny's audience biased when, in reality, his audience is just as biased. Hasan states that he is entertaining with his political coverage, and other political streamers make it about drama. When in reality, Hasan is more than happy to rant about other streamers and " drama sloptubers" on stream as well. He also states that people are getting duped by his political takes because he is being clipped, and that people are basing their reasoning on the clip rather than watching the full stream. Hasan then makes comparisons to Ben Shapiro on one of Destiny's takes and states that Destiny is constantly undermining him.

Leigha Sapienti

831,904 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨 SEN. RICK SCOTT JUST NOW: "President Trump is busting his butt. Does he want the Strait of Hormuz closed? NO. But does he want us KILLED by a nuclear weapon? Absolutely not!" "I think Trump is going to have to go in and bomb the living daylights out of Iran to finally get a regime that wants to work with him and stop this death to America, death to everybody in the Middle East." "He's doing the right thing by making sure we all don't get killed by a nuclear weapon."
0:46

🚨 SEN. RICK SCOTT JUST NOW: "President Trump is busting his butt. Does he want the Strait of Hormuz closed? NO. But does he want us KILLED by a nuclear weapon? Absolutely not!" "I think Trump is going to have to go in and bomb the living daylights out of Iran to finally get a regime that wants to work with him and stop this death to America, death to everybody in the Middle East." "He's doing the right thing by making sure we all don't get killed by a nuclear weapon."

Eric Daugherty

47,481 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Trump Hater Crumbles as Piers Morgan Asks One Simple Question PIERS MORGAN: “Why is Bill Clinton able to have sex with an intern in the Oval Office when he’s President and lie to the American people about it on national television? And why is he able to pay off Paula Jones $850,000, four times as much, five times as much as the Trump payment to Stormy Daniels, to get rid of a sexual harassment claim, again, while he’s President, and he has no criminal court recourse for that? Why is that deemed to be better than what happened with Trump and Stormy?” FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “I don’t think anyone is making that case, Piers.” PIERS MORGAN: “No, I’m asking you, what’s the difference? What’s the difference?” FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “The difference is that he didn’t cook the books financially using his own, like using back channels in order to pay.” PIERS MORGAN: “So paying somebody off who says you sexually harassed her, paying her nearly a million dollars while you’re the President of the United States and then having sex with an intern in the Oval Office and lying about it, that’s fine because he’s a Democrat?” FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “Only the leftists in your mind are making that argument.” PIERS MORGAN: “Sorry?”
1:31

Trump Hater Crumbles as Piers Morgan Asks One Simple Question PIERS MORGAN: “Why is Bill Clinton able to have sex with an intern in the Oval Office when he’s President and lie to the American people about it on national television? And why is he able to pay off Paula Jones $850,000, four times as much, five times as much as the Trump payment to Stormy Daniels, to get rid of a sexual harassment claim, again, while he’s President, and he has no criminal court recourse for that? Why is that deemed to be better than what happened with Trump and Stormy?” FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “I don’t think anyone is making that case, Piers.” PIERS MORGAN: “No, I’m asking you, what’s the difference? What’s the difference?” FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “The difference is that he didn’t cook the books financially using his own, like using back channels in order to pay.” PIERS MORGAN: “So paying somebody off who says you sexually harassed her, paying her nearly a million dollars while you’re the President of the United States and then having sex with an intern in the Oval Office and lying about it, that’s fine because he’s a Democrat?” FRANCESCA FIORENTINI: “Only the leftists in your mind are making that argument.” PIERS MORGAN: “Sorry?”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

5,471,056 просмотров • 2 лет назад

MUST WATCH! Trump just posted a segment from Marc Theissen on Trump’s stance, and it sounds a lot like what I’ve been preaching. Trump is applying maximum pressure to Iran, squeezing them until they capitulate and give up their nuclear ambitions. Trump does not want war, which is why he is feinting and giving Iran one last chance to surrender. Trump’s preferred avenue is a diplomatic resolution. He is posturing and preparing forces to let them know he is not bluffing, but he will call off the dogs if Iran come to their senses and recognize they have no path to victory. They can either give up their nuclear program the easy way, or the hard way, and Trump is going to give them every opportunity to choose the easy way.
2:20

MUST WATCH! Trump just posted a segment from Marc Theissen on Trump’s stance, and it sounds a lot like what I’ve been preaching. Trump is applying maximum pressure to Iran, squeezing them until they capitulate and give up their nuclear ambitions. Trump does not want war, which is why he is feinting and giving Iran one last chance to surrender. Trump’s preferred avenue is a diplomatic resolution. He is posturing and preparing forces to let them know he is not bluffing, but he will call off the dogs if Iran come to their senses and recognize they have no path to victory. They can either give up their nuclear program the easy way, or the hard way, and Trump is going to give them every opportunity to choose the easy way.

Clandestine

62,515 просмотров • 1 год назад

Van Hollen: "Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is necessary in order for us to win, right?" Hegseth: "You asked me what the overarching objective is, and I would say ensuring Iran never has a nuclear weapon." Van Hollen: "You said after Midnight Hammer, 'Our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' Clearly that is not the case based on your testimony today. It's also a fact that the DNI Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of the Intelligence Committee that it was our assessment that Iran did not intend to restart its nuclear program. The President of the United States just about a week ago said Iran has committed not to develop a nuclear weapon."
1:10

Van Hollen: "Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is necessary in order for us to win, right?" Hegseth: "You asked me what the overarching objective is, and I would say ensuring Iran never has a nuclear weapon." Van Hollen: "You said after Midnight Hammer, 'Our bombing campaign obliterated Iran's ability to create nuclear weapons.' Clearly that is not the case based on your testimony today. It's also a fact that the DNI Tulsi Gabbard testified in front of the Intelligence Committee that it was our assessment that Iran did not intend to restart its nuclear program. The President of the United States just about a week ago said Iran has committed not to develop a nuclear weapon."

The Bulwark

606,990 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.
1:11

Lukashenko on nuclear weapons: If we approach the matter from the standpoint of fairness, does the United States of America possess nuclear weapons? Yes, it does. Okay, the United States is the pioneer of nuclear weapons and has held them for a long time. But Israel remains quiet about the fact that it has nuclear weapons. The Iranians could ask, “Why can’t we have nuclear weapons?” Especially when nearby India and Pakistan are nuclear powers. Why can’t Iran have nuclear weapons? If we want fairness, let us gradually, step by step, eliminate all nuclear weapons in the world. But if nuclear weapons are a deterrent, a guarantee that no one will ever attack you, then Iran has the right, like other nations, to possess nuclear weapons for its own defense.

Clash Report

46,958 просмотров • 1 месяц назад