正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Meta released SAM3 a model to reconstruct objects from segmented images. I tried it and here are 4 things I found out - The generation is incredibly fast when compared with other 3D GenAI models - The models generated are not meshes but Gaussian Splatting. I was surprised that... show more

Gabriele Romagnoli

8,693 subscribers

32,447 次观看 • 10 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 条评论

weiyaow 的头像

weiyaow10 个月前

Thanks for trying out the model! In the demo we supported Gaussian Splatting, but the model can output mesh in our open-source release here:

Andy Baker 的头像

Andy Baker10 个月前

You can download the ply files via the browser console's network tab. Just grab the biggest files and rename

softyoda 的头像

softyoda10 个月前

Ah nice

Patrick Gerard 的头像

Patrick Gerard10 个月前

@CreatedByJannn

Tom Laroc / Hi-Fi-Ai 的头像

Tom Laroc / Hi-Fi-Ai10 个月前

@artist_jodi

Sven Viking 的头像

Sven Viking10 个月前

Very good for visualising potential furniture configurations. Very bad for avoiding stubbed toes :).

Justin Chen 的头像

Justin Chen10 个月前

Is it using GS? From my experiments with it, looks like it's using some other generative modeling. I would give the same image multiple times and click on the same objects and each time I would get something different. Some were close, but most looked completely incorrect as in it generated completely different geometries each time.

Dick Applehead 的头像

Dick Applehead10 个月前

And that's why it's completely useless. wake me when it makes geometry with correct topology and uvs

Atelier Elysara 的头像

Atelier Elysara10 个月前

do you happen to know any splatting wizards who ciuld lend me their brains for a bit? got some ideas for how to make this kind of tech useful for games and situations where you dont have a photo to start from but i don't have the knowhow to know if its viable

相关视频

Over the weekend, I added multiplayer "paint ball" dogfight to Tiny Skies, so players can fly around pelting each other with colourful paint balls, just for fun. I tried meshy and tripo to generate some 3D models for the game and the mesh vertices count are really high and lags the game a lot (probably because my game is a globe with thousands of objects - albeit mostly instanced). To my surprise, I found Gemini 3.1 Pro to be really quite good at generating good looking 3D models that are low in poly count. It generated 3D models at a much higher quality than Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4. You can see the upgraded biplane models and some objects in the video below. #vibejam

Over the weekend, I added multiplayer "paint ball" dogfight to Tiny Skies, so players can fly around pelting each other with colourful paint balls, just for fun. I tried meshy and tripo to generate some 3D models for the game and the mesh vertices count are really high and lags the game a lot (probably because my game is a globe with thousands of objects - albeit mostly instanced). To my surprise, I found Gemini 3.1 Pro to be really quite good at generating good looking 3D models that are low in poly count. It generated 3D models at a much higher quality than Opus 4.6, Sonnet 4.6 and GPT 5.4. You can see the upgraded biplane models and some objects in the video below. #vibejam

Danny Limanseta

36,419 次观看 • 5 个月前

Here is some new footage from this paper, offering a glimpse into the future of dynamic 3D Gaussian Splatting models combined with static reconstructed scenes. Imagine this: when the lighting matches, the result becomes practically indistinguishable from reality. Just pick a scene, add characters, and record it from any angle. Apply diffusion models to instantly change the look. I firmly believe this is the future of VFX.

Here is some new footage from this paper, offering a glimpse into the future of dynamic 3D Gaussian Splatting models combined with static reconstructed scenes. Imagine this: when the lighting matches, the result becomes practically indistinguishable from reality. Just pick a scene, add characters, and record it from any angle. Apply diffusion models to instantly change the look. I firmly believe this is the future of VFX.

MrNeRF

58,210 次观看 • 10 个月前

Generate an interactive 3D world ✨ I opened this project in Cursor and uploaded an image of a cozy bookstore. The agent then generated the environment, chose objects to turn into 3D meshes, added colliders, and created sound effects 🤯

Generate an interactive 3D world ✨ I opened this project in Cursor and uploaded an image of a cozy bookstore. The agent then generated the environment, chose objects to turn into 3D meshes, added colliders, and created sound effects 🤯

Justine Moore

77,484 次观看 • 4 个月前

Adobe is entering the image-to-3D game! Their new method, LRM, can create high-fidelity 3D meshes from a single image in just 5 seconds 🔥 It's trained on 1 million objects and is able to generate objects from real-world images and generative AI models.

Adobe is entering the image-to-3D game! Their new method, LRM, can create high-fidelity 3D meshes from a single image in just 5 seconds 🔥 It's trained on 1 million objects and is able to generate objects from real-world images and generative AI models.

Dreaming Tulpa 🥓👑

270,942 次观看 • 2 年前

I feel like AI generated music is improving even faster than AI generated images right now 100% of the instrumental & vocals, including the talk outro, are generated here. I just provided the lyrics & prompted a trap beat in Suno I can only imagine what the next versions of these models will be able to do... generative music is about to be everywhere

I feel like AI generated music is improving even faster than AI generated images right now 100% of the instrumental & vocals, including the talk outro, are generated here. I just provided the lyrics & prompted a trap beat in Suno I can only imagine what the next versions of these models will be able to do... generative music is about to be everywhere

Nick St. Pierre

67,854 次观看 • 2 年前

Ross Coulthart -“Okay. I'm calling it, I think the drones are anomalous. I think they may potentially be NHI” Source -Need To Know 🔗 in comments Ross -“Okay. I'm calling it, I think the drones are anomalous. I think they may potentially be NHI. I've had people from the intelligence community who have asserted flatly to me that they are Chinese or Russian drones. Bullshit. I don't believe it. And I'm calling that up, nobody. And I've really milked all my sources. Nobody I can find has any evidence at all to prove that these are foreign adversary drones. I don't even think they're drones. Whatever they are. I've spoken now to multiple people who've told me they've seen these objects morphing. I, I can't verify the authenticity of it, but I tweeted recently about one that was hovering over a house that somebody videoed, and it was literally, it looked like two airplane cockpits a little bit apart from each other. It looked like whatever the hologram was that was being generated, it hadn't quite worked. And it was hovering over a house and drifting very slowly in a particular direction and whatever that is, it's not a conventional aircraft. And it's interesting because I asked somebody about this at a relatively high level in the defense community just this week, and they said to me, Ross, if you were the US Air Force and the White House, would you want to admit that there are objects operating with total impunity over the continental United States that we can't track? We can't detect, we don't know where they're coming from or where they're going to. We don't know who's responsible for them, and more importantly, we can bring them down. Would you want to admit that? And the answer is no. And it's interesting because more and more, I think it's a bunch of A-type males in the US military who just can't bring themselves to admit that despite the expenditure of trillions of dollars, the security and defense and integrity of the national airspace of the United States cannot be guaranteed. That's the issue behind the drones, whatever they are, I suspect, yes, there have been some drones going up, and that's a matter of public record. Skywatcher, for example, reported that some of the objects that they saw were indeed sort of commercial drones that somebody was putting up. But they've also, as Jake told me yesterday, made it very clear that the objects that they were seeing included highly anomalous objects. And this is something that John and Jerry Tedesco have picked up with their Nightcrawler research laboratory. They've gone out and they've actually looked at these objects through their hyperspectral cameras and their other optical and sensor devices, and what they are recording is anomalous. So the big issue to me is not that these objects are anomalous, it's why is the United States government notably the Trump White House putting out a statement that is egregiously false and misleading and completely unsustainable in light of what Jake Barber has said. And in light of what New Jersey police and other military continue to say to me that these objects are anomalous. They're still there, they're still hovering, and whatever they are, they are not normal terrestrial vehicles.”

Ross Coulthart -“Okay. I'm calling it, I think the drones are anomalous. I think they may potentially be NHI” Source -Need To Know 🔗 in comments Ross -“Okay. I'm calling it, I think the drones are anomalous. I think they may potentially be NHI. I've had people from the intelligence community who have asserted flatly to me that they are Chinese or Russian drones. Bullshit. I don't believe it. And I'm calling that up, nobody. And I've really milked all my sources. Nobody I can find has any evidence at all to prove that these are foreign adversary drones. I don't even think they're drones. Whatever they are. I've spoken now to multiple people who've told me they've seen these objects morphing. I, I can't verify the authenticity of it, but I tweeted recently about one that was hovering over a house that somebody videoed, and it was literally, it looked like two airplane cockpits a little bit apart from each other. It looked like whatever the hologram was that was being generated, it hadn't quite worked. And it was hovering over a house and drifting very slowly in a particular direction and whatever that is, it's not a conventional aircraft. And it's interesting because I asked somebody about this at a relatively high level in the defense community just this week, and they said to me, Ross, if you were the US Air Force and the White House, would you want to admit that there are objects operating with total impunity over the continental United States that we can't track? We can't detect, we don't know where they're coming from or where they're going to. We don't know who's responsible for them, and more importantly, we can bring them down. Would you want to admit that? And the answer is no. And it's interesting because more and more, I think it's a bunch of A-type males in the US military who just can't bring themselves to admit that despite the expenditure of trillions of dollars, the security and defense and integrity of the national airspace of the United States cannot be guaranteed. That's the issue behind the drones, whatever they are, I suspect, yes, there have been some drones going up, and that's a matter of public record. Skywatcher, for example, reported that some of the objects that they saw were indeed sort of commercial drones that somebody was putting up. But they've also, as Jake told me yesterday, made it very clear that the objects that they were seeing included highly anomalous objects. And this is something that John and Jerry Tedesco have picked up with their Nightcrawler research laboratory. They've gone out and they've actually looked at these objects through their hyperspectral cameras and their other optical and sensor devices, and what they are recording is anomalous. So the big issue to me is not that these objects are anomalous, it's why is the United States government notably the Trump White House putting out a statement that is egregiously false and misleading and completely unsustainable in light of what Jake Barber has said. And in light of what New Jersey police and other military continue to say to me that these objects are anomalous. They're still there, they're still hovering, and whatever they are, they are not normal terrestrial vehicles.”

neandrewthal

74,116 次观看 • 1 年前

Mamdani: I appreciated is in our meeting to appreciate a portrait of F.D.R. And the incredible work that was done with the new deal and in thinking about what it could look like when the federal government and New York City government to deliver on affordability can be transformative. President Trump: I found the picture in the vaults. I put it up

Mamdani: I appreciated is in our meeting to appreciate a portrait of F.D.R. And the incredible work that was done with the new deal and in thinking about what it could look like when the federal government and New York City government to deliver on affordability can be transformative. President Trump: I found the picture in the vaults. I put it up

Acyn

1,373,188 次观看 • 10 个月前

Hi3D V3.0 is out today, and it is the most detailed and realistic 3D generator I have run. And its first model to build geometry at 2048³ voxels. The materials were the surprise. PBR output is well ahead of V2.1, and fine surface relief survives where the other frontier models smooth it flat. I compared it against the current top models across a wide spread of objects, textures on and textures off. It lands at number 2 in my ranking. For 3D printing I think it takes first outright. Also, they opened 48 hours of free access for the launch, which almost nobody does. Full breakdown:

Hi3D V3.0 is out today, and it is the most detailed and realistic 3D generator I have run. And its first model to build geometry at 2048³ voxels. The materials were the surprise. PBR output is well ahead of V2.1, and fine surface relief survives where the other frontier models smooth it flat. I compared it against the current top models across a wide spread of objects, textures on and textures off. It lands at number 2 in my ranking. For 3D printing I think it takes first outright. Also, they opened 48 hours of free access for the launch, which almost nobody does. Full breakdown:

Stefan 3D AI

12,711 次观看 • 1 个月前

Had my mind blown today by how simple it was to buy Tokenized Gold. I was listening to Balaji talk about Gold today on a podcast with Luke Gromen I asked ChatGPT “what’s the best way to buy Gold that’s digital and almost like owning the real thing?” It responded with “tokenized gold: Each token represents ownership of real, physical gold This is not a gold stock, not an ETF, and not a synthetic bet—it’s closer to digital warehouse receipts for gold.” It then said the best option was Tether Gold (XAUT). I remembered recently the World team saying that you could buy real assets like Gold on World App. I wondered if you could buy XAUT? I opened the app and one of the first ten assets was XAUT. Swap USDC for Tether Gold in under 10 seconds and that’s it. The experience was magical. We are so close the Balaji vision of interoperable money and assets. When everything is a token, value will be the only thing that matters again. Tokens are just 24/7 global markets for trust. People will be able to move in and out of whatever assets they trust instantly. Trust will become the most important thing that compounds. What’s even cooler, is that you can then send Gold to anyone, instantly in World Chat 💬 Any asset, anywhere, to anyone, in any any chat. Check out the screen recordings to see how fast and easy it was

Had my mind blown today by how simple it was to buy Tokenized Gold. I was listening to Balaji talk about Gold today on a podcast with Luke Gromen I asked ChatGPT “what’s the best way to buy Gold that’s digital and almost like owning the real thing?” It responded with “tokenized gold: Each token represents ownership of real, physical gold This is not a gold stock, not an ETF, and not a synthetic bet—it’s closer to digital warehouse receipts for gold.” It then said the best option was Tether Gold (XAUT). I remembered recently the World team saying that you could buy real assets like Gold on World App. I wondered if you could buy XAUT? I opened the app and one of the first ten assets was XAUT. Swap USDC for Tether Gold in under 10 seconds and that’s it. The experience was magical. We are so close the Balaji vision of interoperable money and assets. When everything is a token, value will be the only thing that matters again. Tokens are just 24/7 global markets for trust. People will be able to move in and out of whatever assets they trust instantly. Trust will become the most important thing that compounds. What’s even cooler, is that you can then send Gold to anyone, instantly in World Chat 💬 Any asset, anywhere, to anyone, in any any chat. Check out the screen recordings to see how fast and easy it was

Shane Mac

12,559 次观看 • 9 个月前

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

.Erik Voorhees: It’s actually good, from the Trojan horse perspective, that Bitcoin was traceable enough for traditional institutions to tolerate it. “When Bitcoin came out, everyone called it private, thought of it as private. It was referred to as anonymous in every news story. And in some ways, it is very private and very anonymous. But the truth is that it’s also extremely trackable and traceable. It is not private in reality. And the question is, should it have been from the start? And at first I thought, yes, it should have been more private. And that was a mistake in its design. However, I think if Bitcoin had been anonymous truly from the start, like a Zcash or a Monero, it would have had such antagonism from the state. I don’t know that the state could have snuffed it out, but they would have tried much harder. And I think it’s actually good, from the Trojan horse metaphor perspective, that it was traceable enough that the traditional institutions could tolerate it. They’ve never liked it, but they could at least tolerate it because there is some traceability. And that has allowed Bitcoin to grow. And I think in its shadow, that other crypto assets are actually anonymous is very healthy. The strength of cryptocurrency as a concept in society, I think, is served best when Bitcoin itself is not perfectly private, but other assets are. That is a very difficult thing, I think, for the state to combat. And that decentralization of attributes is really, really crucial. So, yeah, I’m very glad that there are other coins that are private. I want there to be more of them, and I want them to be more popular. And I think it’s okay that Bitcoin itself is not.”

Arjun Khemani

23,351 次观看 • 3 个月前

Jason Calacanis: Anthropic, OpenAI and others are trying to kill OpenClaw Why? Because an open source agent platform is an existential threat to frontier model companies. @jason: “ People are going to say I'm a conspiracy theorist, but the number one goal, I believe, in the large language model, frontier model space, is to kill (OpenClaw). This is a giant movement to stop it, because this is the equivalent of having an open source Android-like player in the market, and that could be incredibly disruptive. Because, I believe, open source is going to win the day on the large language models and take 90% of the token usage, and I think the entire frontier model space could be undercut by open source. And I think they realize that SLMs, the smaller language models that are verticalized now, that will run on desktops and laptops and are even starting to run on the top ones, that is their biggest competitive threat, and I hope it happens.”

Jason Calacanis: Anthropic, OpenAI and others are trying to kill OpenClaw Why? Because an open source agent platform is an existential threat to frontier model companies. @jason: “ People are going to say I'm a conspiracy theorist, but the number one goal, I believe, in the large language model, frontier model space, is to kill (OpenClaw). This is a giant movement to stop it, because this is the equivalent of having an open source Android-like player in the market, and that could be incredibly disruptive. Because, I believe, open source is going to win the day on the large language models and take 90% of the token usage, and I think the entire frontier model space could be undercut by open source. And I think they realize that SLMs, the smaller language models that are verticalized now, that will run on desktops and laptops and are even starting to run on the top ones, that is their biggest competitive threat, and I hope it happens.”

The All-In Podcast

64,677 次观看 • 5 个月前

Greenland Minister Naaja Nathanielsen on whether US threats are signalling the end of NATO: ‘I definitely think that NATO is in a difficult place right now… I think NATO is under a lot of stress. I don’t know the future of it. I don’t even know the future of the broader geopolitical situation two years from now. I think things are changing quite a bit, and it’s going to be difficult. I think I agree with Carney when he says that there’s really no going back to what was. I think we have to figure out where to go next. So I cannot answer your question with a very clear answer. I think things are changing. But I do still believe that NATO, for my part of the world, has brought more peace, and realising of course this is not the truth anywhere or everywhere. I understand that fully. But for Greenland, it has brought a period of more peace.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Greenland Minister Naaja Nathanielsen on whether US threats are signalling the end of NATO: ‘I definitely think that NATO is in a difficult place right now… I think NATO is under a lot of stress. I don’t know the future of it. I don’t even know the future of the broader geopolitical situation two years from now. I think things are changing quite a bit, and it’s going to be difficult. I think I agree with Carney when he says that there’s really no going back to what was. I think we have to figure out where to go next. So I cannot answer your question with a very clear answer. I think things are changing. But I do still believe that NATO, for my part of the world, has brought more peace, and realising of course this is not the truth anywhere or everywhere. I understand that fully. But for Greenland, it has brought a period of more peace.’ Watch the full interview in the quoted post below, or watch it on Rumble, link below in the replies👇

Going Underground

35,093 次观看 • 8 个月前

Adobe.. has released a tool that combines Generative Gaussian Splats with a Diffusion layer and it's not all over the internet? WHAT IS GOING ON :D I had to test this out ofc! Substance 3D viewer, the new 3d viewer just released by Adobe, not only supports viewing of a large, large list of 3d formats, but it also supports generating of 3d models as Gaussian Splats. Combine that with the built-in 3d to image functionality and you basically have at least a few of the steps I've been doing for the last year or so using multiple tools. Exciting stuff! The new Photoshop Beta also supports the 3D viewer and you can import 3d files directly in photoshop as smart objects linked to the viewer. The elements you prompt in based on your models, can be easily exported to your clipboard without backgrounds making it very easy to use this in your normal image editing workflows. I have a suspicion that we'll see much more of this in other Adobe tools and I'm very curious to see this used for things like this in more 3d tools than "just" Adobe Neo (which is fantastic btw). #adobe #art #gaussiansplatting

Adobe.. has released a tool that combines Generative Gaussian Splats with a Diffusion layer and it's not all over the internet? WHAT IS GOING ON :D I had to test this out ofc! Substance 3D viewer, the new 3d viewer just released by Adobe, not only supports viewing of a large, large list of 3d formats, but it also supports generating of 3d models as Gaussian Splats. Combine that with the built-in 3d to image functionality and you basically have at least a few of the steps I've been doing for the last year or so using multiple tools. Exciting stuff! The new Photoshop Beta also supports the 3D viewer and you can import 3d files directly in photoshop as smart objects linked to the viewer. The elements you prompt in based on your models, can be easily exported to your clipboard without backgrounds making it very easy to use this in your normal image editing workflows. I have a suspicion that we'll see much more of this in other Adobe tools and I'm very curious to see this used for things like this in more 3d tools than "just" Adobe Neo (which is fantastic btw). #adobe #art #gaussiansplatting

Martin Nebelong

280,121 次观看 • 1 年前

The models are getting better everyday. This is a pretty contact-rich task, and forces us to reckon with the fact that our policies not only need to learn the quirks of different robots, but also have to do it in a way that generalizes to the fine-grained subtleties of friction and forces e.g. so that objects don’t get wedged or stuck. Gave me goosebumps when I first saw these results internally. Something about it too, that just makes these models feel just a bit more “human” now in the way they move than they did before. Wild times.

The models are getting better everyday. This is a pretty contact-rich task, and forces us to reckon with the fact that our policies not only need to learn the quirks of different robots, but also have to do it in a way that generalizes to the fine-grained subtleties of friction and forces e.g. so that objects don’t get wedged or stuck. Gave me goosebumps when I first saw these results internally. Something about it too, that just makes these models feel just a bit more “human” now in the way they move than they did before. Wild times.

Andy Zeng

61,885 次观看 • 2 个月前

Occasionally I try an AI tool so incredible that I simply can’t stop playing with it. The new World Labs model definitely qualifies here. It’s almost impossible to describe how cool it is to walk through a 3D world that you generated from a single image.

Occasionally I try an AI tool so incredible that I simply can’t stop playing with it. The new World Labs model definitely qualifies here. It’s almost impossible to describe how cool it is to walk through a 3D world that you generated from a single image.

Justine Moore

273,045 次观看 • 1 年前

Here is a longer and faster frame rate version of the timelapse. I think it is interesting to compare the size of the bolide blast to other objects in view like the mediterranean, Cairo, or lightning strikes.

Here is a longer and faster frame rate version of the timelapse. I think it is interesting to compare the size of the bolide blast to other objects in view like the mediterranean, Cairo, or lightning strikes.

Matthew Dominick

40,521 次观看 • 2 年前

This is pretty incredible. Opus 5 can procedurally generate 3D worlds from reference images. You can also interact with objects in the generated world and they stay in place, pretty amazing. The iterative refinement from the agent is really impressive. I asked the agent to walk the world and improve it at every step. The visual quality refinement is substantial as the agent explores the world itself. Some visual examples in the next post. I am really impressed by the visual quality. There are still some minor issues but the run is not yet complete. On the other hand it has already burn through 15% of my weekly limits on Max!

This is pretty incredible. Opus 5 can procedurally generate 3D worlds from reference images. You can also interact with objects in the generated world and they stay in place, pretty amazing. The iterative refinement from the agent is really impressive. I asked the agent to walk the world and improve it at every step. The visual quality refinement is substantial as the agent explores the world itself. Some visual examples in the next post. I am really impressed by the visual quality. There are still some minor issues but the run is not yet complete. On the other hand it has already burn through 15% of my weekly limits on Max!

Prompt

65,900 次观看 • 2 个月前

I need to share a bit of context here.. many are going to say that it is not appropriate for Juan to get mad at Nino David Nino Rodriguez .. but on this count it was a very calculated rant. People have talked about him moving the "bar" like in a football game constantly. When in fact it is NOT UP TO HIM. It is a reaction to people saying things are not moving "fast enough" by the Trump Administration. TIMING IS EVERYTHING. NOT YOUR CHOICE. ENJOY THE SHOW. NCSWIC. NOTHING. This time YT didn't take it down! We are in Control.

I need to share a bit of context here.. many are going to say that it is not appropriate for Juan to get mad at Nino David Nino Rodriguez .. but on this count it was a very calculated rant. People have talked about him moving the "bar" like in a football game constantly. When in fact it is NOT UP TO HIM. It is a reaction to people saying things are not moving "fast enough" by the Trump Administration. TIMING IS EVERYTHING. NOT YOUR CHOICE. ENJOY THE SHOW. NCSWIC. NOTHING. This time YT didn't take it down! We are in Control.

Juan O Savin 107

57,126 次观看 • 1 年前