正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

**MH370x Science Supplemental** Macroscopic Decoherence - Bose Einstein Condensate We have figured out how they teleported Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. Macroscopic teleportation is real. A Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) is a state of matter of a dilute gas of bosons cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (that is,...

41,742 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Roy 的头像
Roy2 年前

Euerka 😉

Ashton Forbes 的头像
Ashton Forbes2 年前

There you are. I almost credited you in the body but it felt awkward. Thanks again sir. For everyone reading, Roy helped put this all together for me. The phase change is what triggered me once I read about Bose Einstein condensate.

Larry Gerndt🦋 的头像
Larry Gerndt🦋2 年前

I just finished doing a two-part video on the Reagan briefing, one thing that it confirms is that the scene in Close Encounters where the missing people come back, Director William Casey confirmed that that part of the movie was accurate in the sense that there was an exchange program. We may see these people again.

UAP Islander 的头像
UAP Islander2 年前

This is all insane but I'm following closely with curiosity......seems like out of a movie. Seems scary when you think about the possibilities if this is all true.

Mitzi Tuvey 的头像
Mitzi Tuvey2 年前

Just when I thought it couldn't get any stranger.....whatever is next? I can hardly wait!

UFO Sara 的头像
UFO Sara2 年前

So many thoughts. Are you saying the US has learned teleportation? Or NHI? Could this possibly be a test or were there previous tests?

Ashton Forbes 的头像
Ashton Forbes2 年前

This is 100% our tech. I’m absolutely certain now. I would have said it’s a test but this is MH370. I’m now leaning back on espionage, there had to be planning involved in this, I think. Wtf…

Sean Reid 的头像
Sean Reid2 年前

You should really look at the Philadelphia experiment and Preston Nichols. This tech was being used in 1943…..

WallStreetAdvisor 的头像
WallStreetAdvisor2 年前

But you need precision mapping of the object, it's material, states, and other properties that allow this material to "Exist" in this "field" (we call our universe). And theoretically inject into any other "field/universe" to recreate.

Ashton Forbes 的头像
Ashton Forbes2 年前

Yep, we have that too. This also requires Superconductivity, in 2014. Welcome to disclosure. This is MH370x.

相关视频

6,100-Qubit Processor Shatters Quantum Computing Record | David Nield, ScienceAlert Another major quantum computing record has been broken, and by a considerable margin: physicists have now built an array containing 6,100 qubits, the largest of its type and way above the thousand or so qubits previous systems contained. It's the work of scientists from the California Institute of Technology, who used cesium atoms as their qubits, trapping them in place with a complex system of lasers that acted as tweezers to keep the atoms as stable as possible. Qubits differ from the classical bits of traditional computers by exploiting what's known as a superposition: not just binary states of 1 or 0, but a spread of probabilities that allows for algorithms that can solve problems considered out of reach of conventional computing methods. Related: Quantum Advantage: A Physicist Explains The Future of Computers A lot of qubits will be needed to make quantum algorithms practical, however. One reason for these large arrays is error correction, which helps overcome the inherent fragility of the qubit by providing a surplus to double-check the machine's operation. "This is an exciting moment for neutral-atom quantum computing," says physicist Manuel Endres. "We can now see a pathway to large error-corrected quantum computers. The building blocks are in place." There was no single breakthrough that enabled this jump in qubit numbers, but rather a series of engineering advancements in many key areas – from the laser tweezers to the ultra-high (very low pressure) vacuum chamber. Stability has also been a problem for quantum computing systems. The innovations in this latest array kept qubits in a superposition state for almost 13 seconds – almost ten times longer than previous configurations had managed. What's more, individual qubits could be manipulated with 99.98 percent accuracy, establishing a significant benchmark in the programmability of quantum technology. "Large scale, with more atoms, is often thought to come at the expense of accuracy, but our results show that we can do both," says physicist Gyohei Nomura. "Qubits aren't useful without quality. Now we have quantity and quality." To make quantum computers a practical alternative to modern supercomputers, more qubits and even greater levels of stability will be required. Experts are tackling the problem from several different angles, which is why records for some types of quantum computer don't necessarily apply to others. Next, the researchers need to work on exploiting entanglement, which will enable the system to make the leap from storing information to actually processing it. Not too far in the future, we could be using these computers to discover new materials, matter, and fundamental laws of physics. "It's exciting that we are creating machines to help us learn about the Universe in ways that only quantum mechanics can teach us," says physicist Hannah Manetsch. Read more:

Owen Gregorian

43,078 次观看 • 8 个月前

Eric Wargo (Eric Wargo) is discovering the ACTUAL science behind “psychic” functioning. TLDR: the Brain is a “Quantum Time Machine”. Literally! Full video in reply below. But here’s the way it works: 1. Nobel prize winner Roger Penrose and collaborator Stuart Hameroff (Stuart Hameroff) proposed that our brains are room temperature quantum systems. This would explain how we convert quantum superposition into the discrete relativistic reality we see every day. Microtubules in the brain may maintain coherence, unlocking this ability. When these are turned off with anesthesia, the body can function completely normally as if a patient is alive, but awareness seems to simply turn off. So it could be the seat of consciousness. We’ve ALREADY definitively discovered quantum effects (superradiance) in the brain (review from Sabine Hossenfelder Sabine Hossenfelder below). And are yearly discovering other quantum biological effects. 2. In quantum systems you have entanglement across space (spooky action at a distance). But you also have entanglement across TIME. The great Robert Lanza has documented this well. If you run double-slit experiments with entangled photons across time, it appears that their measurements affect each other. You can EVEN REVERSE Qubit positions across quantum computations! Many scientists have speculated that in a working quantum computer, you can therefore send information “back in time.” So if Penrose is right and our brains are quantum, we can send information back in time too! 3. Why would we be confident in this?! Because it would explain A PLETHORA of differences between the human brain and classical computers. Artificial intelligence in classical computing needs big data. The brain learns with small data. Humans make “blink” decisions effectively (Malcolm Gladwell), they come out of the womb with some grammatical knowledge, and they have an innate fear of things that hurt chances of survival (like snakes). We also have a penchant for predicting the future. Right now, the word we use for this is “intuition.” Eric Wargo (Eric Wargo) is turning intuition into a science with his incredible books (list them if possible!). Video essay below :)

Jesse Michels

40,049 次观看 • 1 年前