正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

Michael Easter discusses Jen McCabe’s Google search. He would’ve used Google reverse search warrants and keyword + search term warrants. Google returns a list of users who searched for those terms during that time period, and the timestamps each search was entered (via Google’s servers). Google’s servers don’t record...

OliviaLambo_'s profile picture

Olivia

28,239 subscribers

98,950 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治教育
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 条评论

How_CT_🇺🇸🏴‍☠️ 的头像
How_CT_🇺🇸🏴‍☠️1 年前

You can bet the FBI has already done this

Mobile Scanner 的头像
Mobile Scanner1 年前

Scan any documents, convert images into text, PDF files, etc. 👍

GR8aruba 的头像
GR8aruba1 年前

Can this reverse search still be done, is it too late? Hos long does Google hold those records?

Jan kan 的头像
Jan kan1 年前

But but but Karen came to her in a dream and told her to google it at 2:27….

ThisMachineKillsFascists 🇺🇦 🌹🌹🌹 的头像
ThisMachineKillsFascists 🇺🇦 🌹🌹🌹1 年前

What a different trial this would have been with him. I realized why Cannone was never going to let him say 1 word about anything .

Jan kan 的头像
Jan kan1 年前

Wasn’t there someone from Google on the witness list?

Olivia 的头像
Olivia1 年前

Yes:

Casual Observer 的头像
Casual Observer1 年前

They've known the whole time.....

Jenn Mass 14 的头像
Jenn Mass 141 年前

We only need to think back to pretrial where defense said a a quantico trained analyst said it happened at 2:27 am to know the feds did actually do this…

Chris john 的头像
Chris john1 年前

Yeah but Jen said she didn’t so there’s that 🤣

Jen Wren 的头像
Jen Wren1 年前

Can the Google reverse search still be done for Karen's Civil Case that the O'Keefe family filed against her?

相关视频

Imagine how badly Jessica Hyde & Ian Whiffin wanted to back out as expert witnesses for the Commonwealth when they found out that the FBI, including a Quantico trained Special Agent with the FBI’s Regional Computer Forensics Lab, specifically confirmed that the search “hos long to die in cold” was made on Jen McCabe’s phone, and it was made at or before 2:27:40am on January 29, 2022. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #Cellebrite #PoliceCorruption
0:40

Imagine how badly Jessica Hyde & Ian Whiffin wanted to back out as expert witnesses for the Commonwealth when they found out that the FBI, including a Quantico trained Special Agent with the FBI’s Regional Computer Forensics Lab, specifically confirmed that the search “hos long to die in cold” was made on Jen McCabe’s phone, and it was made at or before 2:27:40am on January 29, 2022. #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #CantonCoverup #Cellebrite #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

293,051 次观看 • 2 年前

Since the 2:27 am Jen McCabe search triggered the antis, I will repost this subject as long as I desire until everyone start asking critical questions. In that, Jen McCabe conducted the 2:27am search using Safari, not Google. Both are search engines. Dear Jen McCabe and the antis: ✍️Google is a search engine just like Safari and Yahoo are search engines. ✍️Cellebrite that the antis are bragging about is just a mere analyzing tool used for extractions. Cellebrite also has the capacity to search the B/W Database for deleted searches. ✅Jen carried out a search typing “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27 am using Safari search engine. ✅The commonwealth contracted Ian Wiffen who claimed he analyzed Jen McCabe’s phone extractions. 💁🏼The point is if the evidence shows in the extractions report is being denied by Jen McCabe, why is she not suing Safari that the extractions was collated from? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the company Ian Wiffen work for? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the commonwealth that relies on Cellebrite that provides the attached report which CLEARLY shows the Cellebrite BW / database showing that “hos long to die in cold” search occurred at 2:27am but B/W database exposed it as “deleted”? 💁🏼 Why didn’t Jen McCabe request her search history from Safari to counter Cellebrite extractions attached which CLEARLY state she searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am and the search was “deleted”? Guys, Safari, Google or Yahoo can provide you with your search histories including what is deleted dating back years but within a timeframe. 🤟Read the attached and watch Ian Whiffen stating that he cannot testify with certainty how the “hos long to die in cold” was “deleted”. 💁🏼The question you need to ASK JEN MCCABE is how did Cellebrite extracted “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th from her phone Back Wall BW / Database? 💁🏼If Jen McCabe NEVER search “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th as shown attached, it won’t reflect on her phone BW, database. ✅In fact, there is a recent missing person case that the FBI used the same BW to extract information from the ring camera that was said to have been override. ✅This is similar to what happened with Jen McCabe’s search and Cellebrite BW extracted the search from her phone Database even though it was deleted. Stop allowing corrupt officials and their colluded oligarchs pull a wool over your eyes. These same colluded party lied through their teeth during the criminal trials one and two in the matter between the Commonwealth vs Karen Read. Yet, they are suing the same Karen they attempted to frame for defamation? #karenread #justiceforofficerjohnokeefe #fkr
0:28

Since the 2:27 am Jen McCabe search triggered the antis, I will repost this subject as long as I desire until everyone start asking critical questions. In that, Jen McCabe conducted the 2:27am search using Safari, not Google. Both are search engines. Dear Jen McCabe and the antis: ✍️Google is a search engine just like Safari and Yahoo are search engines. ✍️Cellebrite that the antis are bragging about is just a mere analyzing tool used for extractions. Cellebrite also has the capacity to search the B/W Database for deleted searches. ✅Jen carried out a search typing “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27 am using Safari search engine. ✅The commonwealth contracted Ian Wiffen who claimed he analyzed Jen McCabe’s phone extractions. 💁🏼The point is if the evidence shows in the extractions report is being denied by Jen McCabe, why is she not suing Safari that the extractions was collated from? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the company Ian Wiffen work for? 💁🏼Why is she not suing the commonwealth that relies on Cellebrite that provides the attached report which CLEARLY shows the Cellebrite BW / database showing that “hos long to die in cold” search occurred at 2:27am but B/W database exposed it as “deleted”? 💁🏼 Why didn’t Jen McCabe request her search history from Safari to counter Cellebrite extractions attached which CLEARLY state she searched “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am and the search was “deleted”? Guys, Safari, Google or Yahoo can provide you with your search histories including what is deleted dating back years but within a timeframe. 🤟Read the attached and watch Ian Whiffen stating that he cannot testify with certainty how the “hos long to die in cold” was “deleted”. 💁🏼The question you need to ASK JEN MCCABE is how did Cellebrite extracted “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th from her phone Back Wall BW / Database? 💁🏼If Jen McCabe NEVER search “hos long to die in cold” at 2:27am on the 29th as shown attached, it won’t reflect on her phone BW, database. ✅In fact, there is a recent missing person case that the FBI used the same BW to extract information from the ring camera that was said to have been override. ✅This is similar to what happened with Jen McCabe’s search and Cellebrite BW extracted the search from her phone Database even though it was deleted. Stop allowing corrupt officials and their colluded oligarchs pull a wool over your eyes. These same colluded party lied through their teeth during the criminal trials one and two in the matter between the Commonwealth vs Karen Read. Yet, they are suing the same Karen they attempted to frame for defamation? #karenread #justiceforofficerjohnokeefe #fkr

AIM

14,791 次观看 • 3 个月前

Alright, folks, here is the highest qualify copy possible (including isolated and boosted sound) of Karen Read caught on recording asking Jen McCabe to make a Google search after 6am on 1/29/22 at the scene of John O'Keefe's death. What do you hear? Here are some suggestions from the towel friends on today's special birthday: "Google hypothermia...hurry one of you...how long for you to die in the cold." "Can you Google, one of you, to die in the cold." "Can you Google for how long for you to die in the cold." "Google...hypothermia...to die in cold." "Google how long for you to die in the cold." "Look to see how long to die in cold."
4:03

Alright, folks, here is the highest qualify copy possible (including isolated and boosted sound) of Karen Read caught on recording asking Jen McCabe to make a Google search after 6am on 1/29/22 at the scene of John O'Keefe's death. What do you hear? Here are some suggestions from the towel friends on today's special birthday: "Google hypothermia...hurry one of you...how long for you to die in the cold." "Can you Google, one of you, to die in the cold." "Can you Google for how long for you to die in the cold." "Google...hypothermia...to die in cold." "Google how long for you to die in the cold." "Look to see how long to die in cold."

Grant Smith Ellis

36,495 次观看 • 1 年前

Michael Easter, a retired FBI special agent questions why the MSP did not subpoena Google in the murder case of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. A Google subpoena could have definitively resolved the 2.27 a.m. search issue. If Jennifer McCabe did not make the search, Google’s server logs would have been the strongest proof. Instead, they chose to rely on debated and confusing internal forensics. Jessica Hyde reported in May 2023 that the search existed and was deleted, then later issued a Cellebrite-only report after Ian Whiffin’s software updates removed the timestamp, even though other programs still showed the 2.27 a.m. search, as per Greene, Karen Read’s forensic expert, a point Whiffin agreed with. Subpoenaing Google would have put the facts with a neutral third party, so it was avoided. That absence speaks volumes. Michael Easter was a powerful witness for Karen, hence Auntie Bev denied his testimony. This was not incompetence. It was corruption.
1:19

Michael Easter, a retired FBI special agent questions why the MSP did not subpoena Google in the murder case of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. A Google subpoena could have definitively resolved the 2.27 a.m. search issue. If Jennifer McCabe did not make the search, Google’s server logs would have been the strongest proof. Instead, they chose to rely on debated and confusing internal forensics. Jessica Hyde reported in May 2023 that the search existed and was deleted, then later issued a Cellebrite-only report after Ian Whiffin’s software updates removed the timestamp, even though other programs still showed the 2.27 a.m. search, as per Greene, Karen Read’s forensic expert, a point Whiffin agreed with. Subpoenaing Google would have put the facts with a neutral third party, so it was avoided. That absence speaks volumes. Michael Easter was a powerful witness for Karen, hence Auntie Bev denied his testimony. This was not incompetence. It was corruption.

Lara

83,890 次观看 • 4 个月前

EXPOSING JEN MCCABE’S 2:27AM SEARCH 🧵A thread🧵 Proof she’s lying. No computer expert necessary. ADA Adam Lally asks Jen McCabe about when & why she made those Google searches at the scene in the morning. The video footage proves that Jen McCabe’s entire story about #KarenRead purportedly asking her to Google “hos long to die in cold” is a lie because it never happened. Jen claims Karen asked her to make those Google searches while the first responders are moving #JohnOKeefe’s body from the ground to the ambulance, which is interesting because her story starts out with them (her & Karen) seated in the back of a Police cruiser, so it’s unclear how they magically teleported from there to standing outside. As you’ll also see in the attached footage, it’s clear Jen & Karen are outside the entirety of the time leading up to when Jen claims this happened, removing the possibility that they could’ve moved from a cruiser to the outside to account for Jen’s story’s discrepancies. Officer Mullaney will further corroborate this. THE PROBLEM IS: Jen McCabe claims to have made these searches during the same time that first responders were working on/moving John into the ambulance, but this is completely disproven by dashcam surveillance footage from the scene showing him being worked on at 6:14:10am & moved into the ambulance at 6:14:50am. Jen made no searches at or around this time. She made her searches at 6:23 & 6:24am, nearly 10 minutes later. Furthermore, none of the things—like prayers & blood—that Jen claims happened between her, Karen & Kerry at this time, actually happen. The footage shows it’s all made up, like Karen asking Jen to Google anything. ————— JEN MCCABE’S TESTIMONY: Jen claims she was sitting in the back of the Police cruiser with #KarenRead, that she “scooched in” beside her in the back, and that Kerry Roberts came over. Next, Jen claims that Karen grabbed their hands & asked them to pray, looked at her (own) hands & saw blood, and proceeded to ask if she could’ve gotten her period. Jen then claims Karen said “what if he’s dead? Who’s gonna take care of the kids?” (or something to that effect). Jen then says: “Then we prayed. Um…then at the end, um, Mister—they were moving John, and at that point Karen told Kerry ‘go over, look! Is he dead? Is he dead? Is he dead?’ over & over, and Kerry says ‘I’ll go over and check on him’ and [Karen] was yelling ‘are they working on him?’.” Jen proceeds to say: “And then at that point, [Karen] grabbed my hands & she said ‘Google hypothermia, Google how long it takes to die in the cold’.” Then Jen McCabe testifies: “And so I had my phone out, and it was cold, and my hands were frozen, and I have MS, and I took my phone out while she was screaming & shaking my arm. And I attempted to Google “how long does it take to die in the cold”. ADA Lally then asks Jen McCabe: “And, um, when you conducted that search, that was at the defendant’s request, on scene, sometime after 6am on that date, correct?” Jen testifies: “Yes.” ADA Lally: “Do you recall anything as far as what the search results were, or did you click on anything, or did you get an answer to the question the defendant had posed to you?” Jen McCabe: “I don’t even think I got an answer because as I kept Googling, and she kept yelling, and then they were moving John, and the next thing I knew we were kind of moving because she wanted to see if they were working on him.” ADA Lally: “And so you were moving along with the defendant over towards where Mr. O’Keefe had gone to the back of the ambulance?” Jen McCabe: “Yes we kind of just moved to see what was going on.” ADA Lally: “When you moved over what did you see then?” Jen McCabe: “They were just, uh putting him in the back of the ambulance.” ————— See attached timeline. If Jen’s claim that Karen asked her to Google that were true, then Jen would’ve Google’d it during any time in the orange/red box (6:14 - 6:15am). #KarenReadTrial
2:51

EXPOSING JEN MCCABE’S 2:27AM SEARCH 🧵A thread🧵 Proof she’s lying. No computer expert necessary. ADA Adam Lally asks Jen McCabe about when & why she made those Google searches at the scene in the morning. The video footage proves that Jen McCabe’s entire story about #KarenRead purportedly asking her to Google “hos long to die in cold” is a lie because it never happened. Jen claims Karen asked her to make those Google searches while the first responders are moving #JohnOKeefe’s body from the ground to the ambulance, which is interesting because her story starts out with them (her & Karen) seated in the back of a Police cruiser, so it’s unclear how they magically teleported from there to standing outside. As you’ll also see in the attached footage, it’s clear Jen & Karen are outside the entirety of the time leading up to when Jen claims this happened, removing the possibility that they could’ve moved from a cruiser to the outside to account for Jen’s story’s discrepancies. Officer Mullaney will further corroborate this. THE PROBLEM IS: Jen McCabe claims to have made these searches during the same time that first responders were working on/moving John into the ambulance, but this is completely disproven by dashcam surveillance footage from the scene showing him being worked on at 6:14:10am & moved into the ambulance at 6:14:50am. Jen made no searches at or around this time. She made her searches at 6:23 & 6:24am, nearly 10 minutes later. Furthermore, none of the things—like prayers & blood—that Jen claims happened between her, Karen & Kerry at this time, actually happen. The footage shows it’s all made up, like Karen asking Jen to Google anything. ————— JEN MCCABE’S TESTIMONY: Jen claims she was sitting in the back of the Police cruiser with #KarenRead, that she “scooched in” beside her in the back, and that Kerry Roberts came over. Next, Jen claims that Karen grabbed their hands & asked them to pray, looked at her (own) hands & saw blood, and proceeded to ask if she could’ve gotten her period. Jen then claims Karen said “what if he’s dead? Who’s gonna take care of the kids?” (or something to that effect). Jen then says: “Then we prayed. Um…then at the end, um, Mister—they were moving John, and at that point Karen told Kerry ‘go over, look! Is he dead? Is he dead? Is he dead?’ over & over, and Kerry says ‘I’ll go over and check on him’ and [Karen] was yelling ‘are they working on him?’.” Jen proceeds to say: “And then at that point, [Karen] grabbed my hands & she said ‘Google hypothermia, Google how long it takes to die in the cold’.” Then Jen McCabe testifies: “And so I had my phone out, and it was cold, and my hands were frozen, and I have MS, and I took my phone out while she was screaming & shaking my arm. And I attempted to Google “how long does it take to die in the cold”. ADA Lally then asks Jen McCabe: “And, um, when you conducted that search, that was at the defendant’s request, on scene, sometime after 6am on that date, correct?” Jen testifies: “Yes.” ADA Lally: “Do you recall anything as far as what the search results were, or did you click on anything, or did you get an answer to the question the defendant had posed to you?” Jen McCabe: “I don’t even think I got an answer because as I kept Googling, and she kept yelling, and then they were moving John, and the next thing I knew we were kind of moving because she wanted to see if they were working on him.” ADA Lally: “And so you were moving along with the defendant over towards where Mr. O’Keefe had gone to the back of the ambulance?” Jen McCabe: “Yes we kind of just moved to see what was going on.” ADA Lally: “When you moved over what did you see then?” Jen McCabe: “They were just, uh putting him in the back of the ambulance.” ————— See attached timeline. If Jen’s claim that Karen asked her to Google that were true, then Jen would’ve Google’d it during any time in the orange/red box (6:14 - 6:15am). #KarenReadTrial

Olivia

341,674 次观看 • 2 年前

Michael Easter, a retired FBI special agent questions why the MSP did not subpoena Google in the murder case of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. A Google subpoena could have definitively resolved the 2.27 a.m. search issue. If Jennifer McCabe did not make the search, Google’s server logs would have been the strongest proof. Instead, they chose to rely on debated and confusing internal forensics. Jessica Hyde reported in May 2023 that the search existed and was deleted, then later issued a Cellebrite-only report after Ian Whiffin’s software updates removed the timestamp, even though other programs still showed the 2.27 a.m. search, as per Greene, Karen Read’s forensic expert, a point Whiffin agreed with. Subpoenaing Google would have put the facts with a neutral third party, so it was avoided. That absence speaks volumes. This was not incompetence. It was corruption.
1:19

Michael Easter, a retired FBI special agent questions why the MSP did not subpoena Google in the murder case of Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. A Google subpoena could have definitively resolved the 2.27 a.m. search issue. If Jennifer McCabe did not make the search, Google’s server logs would have been the strongest proof. Instead, they chose to rely on debated and confusing internal forensics. Jessica Hyde reported in May 2023 that the search existed and was deleted, then later issued a Cellebrite-only report after Ian Whiffin’s software updates removed the timestamp, even though other programs still showed the 2.27 a.m. search, as per Greene, Karen Read’s forensic expert, a point Whiffin agreed with. Subpoenaing Google would have put the facts with a neutral third party, so it was avoided. That absence speaks volumes. This was not incompetence. It was corruption.

Lara

26,290 次观看 • 6 个月前

J-Cal Explains Why Google is UNDERRATED in AI 👀 On E227, the besties discussed Google's value in a post-search world if AI replaces traditional search. @jason broke down why he thinks Google is being slept on: "I think there's a chance that we're underestimating the power of Google's ad network right now." "They have four or five products that are one or two billion users per month. You have YouTube, Google Docs, Android." "They have such a data advantage and such a deep integration into people's lives because they use three or four services, I think Google's gonna figure this out." "It's quite possible that knowing your queries in Gemini, knowing what you're doing in Calendar, knowing what you're watching on YouTube could lead to a stream of more targeted ads that do better and are more valuable." "We've been seeing a number of startups that are figuring out how to use your queries and what you're doing in AI to present to you search results." "So imagine you're doing a Gemini search and on the side of it, it's giving you a rolling list of ads or offers that you might be more interested in." "That could be a better advertising product than even search itself." "I think YouTube search is the place to go all-in." "Right now, when you do a YouTube search, it just gives you 10 links, right? It just gives you that rolling thing." "You should be able to ask a question to YouTube, and you should be able to ask questions to your calendar." "You should be able to say, who have I met with over the last 10 years? Who I'm no longer in touch with and what are they up to?" "And it should do a Gemini search inside of Google Calendar. It's very light right now." "And then if you did that on YouTube, this would train people at the point of pain in a very deep way without sacrificing Google Search queries too aggressively."
1:20

J-Cal Explains Why Google is UNDERRATED in AI 👀 On E227, the besties discussed Google's value in a post-search world if AI replaces traditional search. @jason broke down why he thinks Google is being slept on: "I think there's a chance that we're underestimating the power of Google's ad network right now." "They have four or five products that are one or two billion users per month. You have YouTube, Google Docs, Android." "They have such a data advantage and such a deep integration into people's lives because they use three or four services, I think Google's gonna figure this out." "It's quite possible that knowing your queries in Gemini, knowing what you're doing in Calendar, knowing what you're watching on YouTube could lead to a stream of more targeted ads that do better and are more valuable." "We've been seeing a number of startups that are figuring out how to use your queries and what you're doing in AI to present to you search results." "So imagine you're doing a Gemini search and on the side of it, it's giving you a rolling list of ads or offers that you might be more interested in." "That could be a better advertising product than even search itself." "I think YouTube search is the place to go all-in." "Right now, when you do a YouTube search, it just gives you 10 links, right? It just gives you that rolling thing." "You should be able to ask a question to YouTube, and you should be able to ask questions to your calendar." "You should be able to say, who have I met with over the last 10 years? Who I'm no longer in touch with and what are they up to?" "And it should do a Gemini search inside of Google Calendar. It's very light right now." "And then if you did that on YouTube, this would train people at the point of pain in a very deep way without sacrificing Google Search queries too aggressively."

The All-In Podcast

58,275 次观看 • 1 年前

Oh my word, how is this even possible? There is now additional audio coming to light in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial from 6:03AM on 1/29/22. Karen says, in full, "Can you Google how long for someone to die in cold...hurry --Jen! Jen! Jen!-- hurry!" We'll talk about this, and so much more, on a special towel birthday stream this morning after 8:30AM ET. Watch live, say hello to little towel, ask your questions about the O'Keefe/Read re-trial and be merry! Link - Previously, I reported: I have now found both copies of Karen Read's voicemail (left on John O'Keefe's phone at 6:03AM on 1/29/22) where Karen directs Jen McCabe to Google how long it takes someone to "die in the cold." The statement can also be heard on Jen's 911 call! Find enhanced audio of Voicemail #8 (left by Karen on John's phone) from trial 1 and trial 2, along with enhanced audio of that 911 call (where Karen can clearly be heard, in the background, saying "...to die in cold", exactly as can he heard on the voicemail recordings). Voicemail #8 Trial 1 timestamped link (1st video in the attached compilation clip) - Voicemail #8 Trial 2 timestamped link (2nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Highest quality possible audio of the 911 call, timestamp 1 minute and 45 seconds in the file (3nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Yesterday, I reported; Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced and isolated sound, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Use your phone [to search] how long for you to die in the cold," as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe.
2:24

Oh my word, how is this even possible? There is now additional audio coming to light in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial from 6:03AM on 1/29/22. Karen says, in full, "Can you Google how long for someone to die in cold...hurry --Jen! Jen! Jen!-- hurry!" We'll talk about this, and so much more, on a special towel birthday stream this morning after 8:30AM ET. Watch live, say hello to little towel, ask your questions about the O'Keefe/Read re-trial and be merry! Link - Previously, I reported: I have now found both copies of Karen Read's voicemail (left on John O'Keefe's phone at 6:03AM on 1/29/22) where Karen directs Jen McCabe to Google how long it takes someone to "die in the cold." The statement can also be heard on Jen's 911 call! Find enhanced audio of Voicemail #8 (left by Karen on John's phone) from trial 1 and trial 2, along with enhanced audio of that 911 call (where Karen can clearly be heard, in the background, saying "...to die in cold", exactly as can he heard on the voicemail recordings). Voicemail #8 Trial 1 timestamped link (1st video in the attached compilation clip) - Voicemail #8 Trial 2 timestamped link (2nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Highest quality possible audio of the 911 call, timestamp 1 minute and 45 seconds in the file (3nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Yesterday, I reported; Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced and isolated sound, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Use your phone [to search] how long for you to die in the cold," as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe.

Grant Smith Ellis

32,695 次观看 • 1 年前

You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead
0:47

You may be wondering why one of the MSP Troopers who investigated Officer #JohnOKeefe’s murder is glaringly absent from the prosecutions witness list in the #KarenReadTrial. Is that because her testimony might be devastating for the claim that Jen McCabe didn’t make that google search at 2:27am? Yes, it’d appear so! (Part 1 of 2). Attorney Yannetti gave us some insight yesterday into why Massachusetts State Police Trooper Kathleen Prince is notably missing from the state’s witness list, but is on the defense’s witness list. Why would the state want to avoid calling the Trooper that interviewed star “witness” Jen McCabe on February 1, 2022? After all, unlike Lead Investigator Michael Proctor’s unrecorded & unsigned interview of Jen, Trooper Prince’s interview is far more detailed and thorough, and Prince also didn’t wait several months to write down & document her interview like Proctor did. Well, perhaps it’s because Trooper Prince’s is the only interview of Jen McCabe’s that ever even mentions anything about the Google search & from Jen McCabe herself. However, this is not the only lie seemingly told by Jen McCabe that Trooper Prince’s interview will expose. McCabe claims that: “Karen was told to sit in a car. Jen went over to Karen when she was in the car…Jen also stated that while her and Karen were in the back of the car, Karen was yelling and screaming one moment and then completely calm the next. Jen said that they prayed the "Our Father" together. Karen then immediately yelled at Jen two times to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?" That’s a big problem for McCabe, which the state probably later realized, hence why they took the creative liberty to completely distort & change Jen’s statements in their later court filings, particularly about how the Google search came about. Why? Jen probably didn’t realize when making this statement to Trooper Prince, who she’s not close friends with unlike Michael Proctor, that the Police cars have dash-cams in them. Thus, if this conversation ever actually happened, like Jen claims, then it’d all be recorded on dash-cam footage. It’s convenient how Jen’s story about when #KarenRead purportedly asked her to Google such a thing also happened inside a car where nobody else would be able to hear it to corroborate Jen’s story. But again, in this early stage of the investigation, Jen likely was unaware that her entire claim would be debunked by the dash-cams that would’ve captured it as proof. So to her, being inside a car was the perfect explanation for why no one else at the scene heard Karen ask that. Because Karen never actually asked it! THIS is Jen McCabe framing Karen Read. But beyond this, we also now have confirmation from Officer Mullaney that Karen & Jen never got into a car together while he was there. So this entire story seems to have been fabricated altogether. In a desperate attempt to remedy this critical fact issue, the state just completely fabricated new testimony in its documents, stating that immediately upon finding John’s body, ‘The defendant then yelled at Ms. McCabe twice to Google, "How long do you have to be left outside to die from hypothermia?’, or something to that effect.” What else was fabricated? The claim that Jen McCabe was taking any measures to try to help save Officer O’Keefe’s life, unlike Read who was. In her interview with Prince, Jen claims: “[She] observed Karen to have blood on her hands and face. Karen was holding her hands up and was saying, ‘I have my period.’ Jen said that she told Karen that was not her blood that it was John's blood from them doing CPR.” Jen McCabe’s trying to win favor for trying to help save John’s life—something she did not do—when she says that the blood on Karen’s face “was John’s blood from them doing CPR”. Except “they” didn’t do CPR. Only Karen Read did CPR as confirmed by yesterday’s 3 state’s first responder witnesses who confirmed as such. #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

193,892 次观看 • 2 年前

The plot thickens! I have now found both copies of Karen Read's voicemail (left on John O'Keefe's phone at 6:03AM on 1/29/22) where Karen directs Jen McCabe to Google how long it takes someone to "die in the cold." The statement can also be heard on Jen's 911 call! Find enhanced audio of Voicemail #8 (left by Karen on John's phone) from trial 1 and trial 2, along with enhanced audio of that 911 call (where Karen can clearly be heard, in the background, saying "...to die in cold", exactly as can he heard on the voicemail recordings). Voicemail #8 Trial 1 timestamped link (1st video in the attached compilation clip) - Voicemail #8 Trial 2 timestamped link (2nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Highest quality possible audio of the 911 call, timestamp 1 minute and 45 seconds in the file (3nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Yesterday, I reported; Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced and isolated sound, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Use your phone [to search] how long for you to die in the cold," as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe. This was a joint project involving myself, MrrderByMaestro and Old Made New Creations. Please follow MBM here - Shout out to Old Made New Creations for figuring this out. Please support their channel here - Join me, and the towel friends, as we discuss this audio (and so much more) during today's catch-up stream (court is off in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial until Tuesday, May 27, 2025, at 9AM ET) here -
1:22

The plot thickens! I have now found both copies of Karen Read's voicemail (left on John O'Keefe's phone at 6:03AM on 1/29/22) where Karen directs Jen McCabe to Google how long it takes someone to "die in the cold." The statement can also be heard on Jen's 911 call! Find enhanced audio of Voicemail #8 (left by Karen on John's phone) from trial 1 and trial 2, along with enhanced audio of that 911 call (where Karen can clearly be heard, in the background, saying "...to die in cold", exactly as can he heard on the voicemail recordings). Voicemail #8 Trial 1 timestamped link (1st video in the attached compilation clip) - Voicemail #8 Trial 2 timestamped link (2nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Highest quality possible audio of the 911 call, timestamp 1 minute and 45 seconds in the file (3nd video in the attached compilation clip) - Yesterday, I reported; Ladies, gentlemen and fellow towels. I believe the towel friends have found audio proof that Karen Read asked Jen McCabe to Google "how long to die in cold" at 6:23am on 1/29/22. This is huge as the recording went under the radar during Read's first trial. Listen below with enhanced and isolated sound, in both real time and 0.75x speed, and hear Karen clearly saying to Jen: "Use your phone [to search] how long for you to die in the cold," as Jen is on the phone with 911 (the recording is from a voicemail from a different phone that caught Karen speaking to Jen) at the scene where John O'Keefe was found, suffering from a head injury and hypothermia, after Read allegedly struck John with her car --while drunk driving with a BAC 2-4 times over the legal limit-- and left him to die on a lawn at 12:32am that morning. So, in short, Jen McCabe --as multiple digital experts, including from Cellebrite, have confirmed-- Googled how long to die in cold at 6:23am and Karen's defense expert, Richard Green (a man with an arrest history for filing a false police report) simply misread a write ahead log in cell phone data from Jen's WallDB that caused years of unnecessary smears directed at McCabe. This was a joint project involving myself, MrrderByMaestro and Old Made New Creations. Please follow MBM here - Shout out to Old Made New Creations for figuring this out. Please support their channel here - Join me, and the towel friends, as we discuss this audio (and so much more) during today's catch-up stream (court is off in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial until Tuesday, May 27, 2025, at 9AM ET) here -

Grant Smith Ellis

44,987 次观看 • 1 年前

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from subpoenas@ring.com stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption
1:39

If Lead Investigator Michael Proctor is depraved enough to unlawfully search #KarenRead’s cellphone for nude photographs of her on January 29, 2022, then what’s not to say he wouldn’t delete the Ring cam videos that subsequently went missing, too? FACT: Both the videos in the Ring cam system & the photographs on Karen Read’s cellphone were accessed unlawfully, without search warrants, by Michael Proctor. Proctor also hid his conflict, failed to recuse himself & then lied for the next 2 years, steadfastly defending the falsehood that he wasn’t lifelong family friends with the Albert’s & McCabe’s. We now know that was a lie. But here’s the thing: Karen immediately turned over her cellphone to Trooper Proctor. So if there’s evidence that Ring cam videos were deleted from her cellphone after Michael Proctor seized it, then it’d be pretty damning proof that he deleted the videos. —————— How did Proctor access Karen Read’s cellphone so quickly, on day 1, when he was searching it for nude photos of her? Fully cooperative & eager to help in the investigation, Karen Read promptly accessed her cellphone in front of investigators to provide them with the contact info of everyone who was present the night before with her & John. Notably, Karen Read voluntarily turned her cellphone over to investigators, without a search warrant, when she was FIRST able to speak with them. These are the actions of an honest & forthcoming witness. Not a murderer. —————— The Commonwealth tells on itself, revealing just how Proctor accessed her cellphone without a search warrant (below) in its own filings: “The troopers further asked the defendant for contact information relating to the people she had indicated were present at the bars. The defendant obliged, and prior to providing said information, the troopers observed the defendant to enter a numerical passcode into her phone to unlock it, prior to retrieving said data.” —————— If Proctor preyed upon Karen Read’s trust by secretly watching her enter her passcode to unlock her cellphone, and remembering it for later so he could go through her phone, without a search warrant, looking for nude photos & other things unrelated to the investigation, then we already know he’s perfectly willing to unlawfully access things on her cellphone for nefarious purposes. If Karen had the Ring app on her cellphone, what’s not to say Proctor didn’t access it to delete videos? Ask yourself this: If Karen Read were guilty, would she be asking for Ring data & videos that’d incriminate her? If Trooper Proctor didn’t unlawfully access the Ring app from either John or Karen’s phones to delete videos, then why would he contact & ask Ring wanting to know how long until their stored user data & videos are deleted from their servers for LE? Which is exactly what Proctor did on February 10, 2022, just days after arresting Karen Read, when he contacted them in an email from [email protected] stating that the Ring videos had been deleted from DropBox after 90 days. If Proctor’s theory was that Karen struck & killed John with her taillight, breaking it into 45 pieces left at the scene, wouldn’t he be immediately filing a search warrant for those Ring videos to show that proof? If Proctor had unlawfully deleted those Ring videos himself though, he’d probably want to know how long until they’d be gone from Ring’s servers—evidence of HIS consciousness of guilt—so he could run out the clock so that they’re unable to be obtained, even when he does ultimately file a search warrant. Might that explain why he lied, purporting to have had a search warrant when he didn’t, knowing that the defense would’ve immediately filed an emergency motion to preserve that evidence? They ran out the clock & even lied to the defense so that there was no possible way for them to intervene before the evidence was fully destroyed & irretrievable. #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #PoliceCorruption

Olivia

153,132 次观看 • 2 年前

The new Google Search is rolling out and there seems to be confusion on what it will look like. Google literally showed us. Let me clarify for anyone who is still unsure of what is rolling out right now. Last month Google responded to everyone saying Search is dead. Here is what they said: "You will absolutely continue to see blue web links in search results. AI Mode is not the default experience in Search. You will continue to get a range of results on Search." [Want to know where your site stands across Google AI, ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, etc? Check here (it's free): Google has explicitly laid out what Search will look like from this point going forward. The new Search box accepts text, images, files, videos, and open Chrome tabs. It anticipates your intent before you finish asking. It is powered by the most advanced Gemini model Google has ever put into Search, and layered on top of that, information agents will now be able to run 24/7 in the background on behalf of your buyer. Think of it in 5 steps: Step 1: The buyer describes their problem, their category, their needs in full. Step 2: The agent breaks that down into sub-topics and maps out a plan. Step 3: It determines what intel is needed right now versus later. Step 4: It monitors blogs, news sites, and social posts continuously for relevant changes. Step 5: It sends the buyer a synthesized update with links and the ability to take action. Blue links are not going away in the short-term, but the brands getting recommended by information agents 24 hours a day while also ranking in traditional results are going to pull so far ahead of the ones doing only one or the other that it will not be a fair fight. This is exactly what SEO Stuff ( has been building for every customer. Optimized content depth that covers every sub-question a buyer in your category asks, so the agent finds you at every step of its plan. Editorial authority from trusted websites that signals credibility to every retrieval system Google has ever built, across both traditional rankings and AI citations simultaneously. One investment. Blue links and AI citations. Around the clock. SEO Stuff's Complete Done-For-You Plan: SEO Stuff's "Optimized Content" Plan: There is a reason more than 80 percent of SEO Stuff customers reorder. The results continue long after the work is done. Google Search is changing. AI Search is here. Your websites need to prepare accordingly. Want to know where your site stands across Google AI, ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, etc? Check here (it's free):
1:26

The new Google Search is rolling out and there seems to be confusion on what it will look like. Google literally showed us. Let me clarify for anyone who is still unsure of what is rolling out right now. Last month Google responded to everyone saying Search is dead. Here is what they said: "You will absolutely continue to see blue web links in search results. AI Mode is not the default experience in Search. You will continue to get a range of results on Search." [Want to know where your site stands across Google AI, ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, etc? Check here (it's free): Google has explicitly laid out what Search will look like from this point going forward. The new Search box accepts text, images, files, videos, and open Chrome tabs. It anticipates your intent before you finish asking. It is powered by the most advanced Gemini model Google has ever put into Search, and layered on top of that, information agents will now be able to run 24/7 in the background on behalf of your buyer. Think of it in 5 steps: Step 1: The buyer describes their problem, their category, their needs in full. Step 2: The agent breaks that down into sub-topics and maps out a plan. Step 3: It determines what intel is needed right now versus later. Step 4: It monitors blogs, news sites, and social posts continuously for relevant changes. Step 5: It sends the buyer a synthesized update with links and the ability to take action. Blue links are not going away in the short-term, but the brands getting recommended by information agents 24 hours a day while also ranking in traditional results are going to pull so far ahead of the ones doing only one or the other that it will not be a fair fight. This is exactly what SEO Stuff ( has been building for every customer. Optimized content depth that covers every sub-question a buyer in your category asks, so the agent finds you at every step of its plan. Editorial authority from trusted websites that signals credibility to every retrieval system Google has ever built, across both traditional rankings and AI citations simultaneously. One investment. Blue links and AI citations. Around the clock. SEO Stuff's Complete Done-For-You Plan: SEO Stuff's "Optimized Content" Plan: There is a reason more than 80 percent of SEO Stuff customers reorder. The results continue long after the work is done. Google Search is changing. AI Search is here. Your websites need to prepare accordingly. Want to know where your site stands across Google AI, ChatGPT, Claude, Grok, etc? Check here (it's free):

Alex Groberman

23,380 次观看 • 21 天前