Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Michael Ovitz built the most powerful agency in Hollywood by making learning from history mandatory. He lived below Martin Scorsese, who screened films every night. Ovitz brought takeout and questions and absorbed knowledge about every director. Then he made his agents do the same thing. He required every CAA...

249,117 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Marc Andreessen says Michael Ovitz crushed Hollywood with a 7am meeting and 20 Jaguars. When Ovitz founded Creative Artists Agency in 1975, the talent business was 90 years old. Every agency ran the same way. Staff meetings started at 9am. At 10am, agents called their own clients with the day's casting news. Ovitz did one thing differently. He moved CAA's staff meeting to 7am. By 8am, his agents were already on the phone. By 9am, the rest of Hollywood was sitting down for coffee. CAA had already called every other agency's clients. Andreessen's reconstruction of the call: You're Paul Newman. Your agent of 20 years calls at 11am about a role. "The guys at CAA called me about that three hours ago." Your agent: "They don't represent you." You: "Yeah, isn't it great?" Then there was the phalanx. Twenty agents would arrive at every premiere. Identical Armani suits. White shirts from Sulka in Beverly Hills. Twenty Jaguars in the parking lot, plates running CAA-1 through CAA-20. The 90-year-old agency model never recovered. Genius — or just ruthless? If you're new here, GeniusThinking is a gallery for the greatest minds in economics, psychology, and history. Follow along for more similar content. P.S. I made a free toolkit breaking down 100+ mental models used by history's greatest thinkers. 5,000+ downloads. 113 five-star reviews. Grab your free copy here: — Marc Andreessen ( Marc Andreessen 🇺🇸 ), co-founder of a16z, on David Senra's ( David Senra ) podcast

GeniusThinking

240,139 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Simon Sinek on why becoming a great leader requires the same mindset as becoming a great parent: Everyone wants to have kids. Nobody thinks about raising them. "People say, 'I want to have kids.' Nobody ever says, 'I would like to raise kids for 18 years.'" Having kids is the fun, easy part. Raising them is where reality sets in: the sleepless nights, the uncertainty, the moments where you have no idea what you're doing. Sinek says leadership works exactly the same way. Everyone gets excited about owning a business, building a team, holding the title. Then the people part arrives and nothing prepared you for it. "The process is easy, you can figure that out. The systems you can master. But the people part is ongoing and sometimes overwhelming." So what do the best leaders do when they hit that wall? The same thing the best parents do. They become students. They read books. They watch talks. They ask others how they're navigating it. Just like a first-time parent, the best leaders go find the education they didn't know they'd need. Because nobody hands you a manual for the people part. That knowledge has to be actively sought. And just like parenting, the hard stretches are punctuated by moments that make everything worth it. Sinek calls them "unexpected glimmers." Watching your team solve a problem without you feels the same as catching your kids sharing when they didn't know you were watching. Seeing someone quietly grow into a leader themselves, not because you told them to, but because the environment you built made space for it. You can't schedule these moments, but when they arrive, they reframe every frustrating stretch that came before. And underneath all of it is the idea that drives Sinek's entire view of leadership: To lead is to serve. "To serve those who serve others is the greatest joy anyone can achieve in life." The best leaders and the best parents share the same quiet understanding: the role was always bigger than they expected. But they showed up anyway, kept learning, and found meaning in the growth of those they were responsible for. That's what it means to lead. And that's what it means to serve.

Big Brain Business

22,105 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

President Obama explains how he solves problems he's not an expert on: When asked by Destin Sandlin (creator of Smarter Every Day) how he gets up to speed on unfamiliar topics, Obama reveals an approach rooted in the scientific method. "Over the years you accumulate knowledge and you test hypothesis and propositions. So how I think about it today is different than the first day I walked into the oval office." He explains that after years in office, he built a baseline of knowledge that changed how he consumed information. Instead of going deep into every briefing book, he began scanning for what was different, looking for anomalies against patterns he'd already seen. "I've learned to be pretty good at listening carefully to people who know a lot more than I do about a topic and making sure that any dissenting voices are in the room at the same time." Obama describes a deliberate structure: After an initial presentation, he makes sure to hear from everyone present. He asks whether anyone disagrees with the baseline facts. He asks whether there's any evidence that contradicts what was just said. If there is, he wants that argument made directly in front of him. "What I'm pretty good at is then asking questions, poking, prodding, testing propositions and seeing if they hold up." He draws a direct parallel between this approach and the scientific method. Accumulate knowledge, challenge assumptions, pressure-test conclusions. A powerful reminder that the best decision-makers aren't the ones with all the answers. They're the ones who know which questions to ask and who to listen to.

Emmett Voss

498,706 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Andrew Wilkinson owns 40+ businesses. He just showed me how he's using OpenClaw, Claude Code and AI agents to run latest business, start new ones, and automate everything. Here's what I learned: 1. In December 2025, something clicked. He started waking up at 3AM with a smile, sitting in terminal with 10 Claude Code tabs open. He hasn't stopped since. He calls it chasing the dragon. 2.He built a full SaaS product called Deep Personality. A 40-minute personality test that generates a 100-page report written like Robert Greene. $20 000 in revenue. Zero employees. The entire business runs on AI agents. 3. He has agents for support, marketing, and dev. When a support ticket comes in, the agent either handles it or sends it to the dev agent. If it's critical, the agent fixes the bug and merges the PR before he wakes up. Then it emails the customer back. 4. His marketing agent is connected to PostHog, manages Meta and Reddit ads, creates ad creative, runs multivariate tests, and sets budgets. He's about to give it a $100 k/month ad budget and see what happens. 5. He forgot his laptop on a trip to Arizona. He ran his entire business from the back of Ubers using OpenClaw. Nobody picked up that every single email was written by AI. 6. His take on vibe coding: the worst part about business is people. Between your vision and execution are 100 people you have to convince. Vibe coding removes all of them. For the first time he can do every part of building a product himself. 7. He was trying to build OpenClaw before OpenClaw existed. Now he uses a tool called Harbor, which is basically a GUI for managing multiple agents. You can see all your agents, their status, knowledge bases, and databases in one place. 8. He built a custom AI for his relationship. He and his girlfriend took 15 psychological tests, put the results into ChatGPT, and asked it to analyze their relationship. It nailed every fight they've ever had. That became the product idea for Deep Personality. 9. His honest take: he spends 50% of his time debugging, 30% improving the setup, and 20% being productive. It's a treadmill. But the 20% that works is so powerful he can't stop. 10. His prediction: we're 3-6 months from being able to hand basic businesses off to AI to run entirely. And pretty soon Anthropic and OpenAI are going to launch AI CEOs. This is an inside look at how a serious operator Andrew Wilkinson is using AI agents in the real world. The good, the bad, the debugging, all of it. Most people don't show you this. Episode is live on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 watch

GREG ISENBERG

144,005 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Warren Buffett on the single best thing an investor could have done in 1942: At a recent shareholder meeting, Buffett explains that he normally goes straight into questions and answers. But this time he opened differently, because he felt the usual format was teaching the wrong lesson. As he puts it, "all the questions would naturally tend toward current events." So he went back to 1942, the year he bought his first stock, to make a point about everything that has happened since. "We've had 14 presidents, seven Republicans, seven Democrats. We've had world wars. We had 911. We had the Cuban missile crisis. We have all kinds of things." His lesson? None of it should have changed what you did with your money. "The best single thing you could have done on March 11th, 1942 when I bought my first stock was just buy an index fund and never look at a headline, never think about stocks anymore. Just like you would do if you bought a farm. You just buy the farm and let the tenant farmer run it for you." Then he gives the number. Buffett describes putting $10,000 into an index fund that reinvested dividends, and he pauses to let the audience guess what it would be worth. The answer: "it would come to $51 million now." The only belief required back then was simple: "The only thing you had to really believe in then is that America would win the war and that America would progress as it has ever since 1776. And that American business, if America moved forward, American business would move forward." Notice what he says you did NOT need: "You didn't have to worry about what stock to buy. You didn't have to worry what day to get in and out. You didn't know the Federal Reserve would exist."

Black Edge

16,436 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Elon Musk is building something no platform in history has actually attempted. A system that judges ideas without knowing who wrote them. Musk: “It should be possible for somebody to post content as a new user with no followers, and if that content is excellent, it gets seen by a lot of people.” Every platform before this ran on a single hidden variable. Identity. Not quality. Not originality. Not depth. Identity. Who you were determined what got seen. The architecture didn’t surface the best thinking. It surfaced the most established thinker. It chose pedigree over precision. Every single time. Musk is the first person with the infrastructure, the capital, and the sheer indifference to consensus required to strip that variable out. Grok reads everything. Every post from every account. Zero followers or ten million. No weighting for legacy. No deference to tenure. It measures one thing. Intrinsic excellence. The printing press created publishers. Radio created networks. Television created anchors. Social media created influencers. Every technology of liberation produced a new gatekeeper within one generation. Musk is betting AI is the first tool that can’t be captured. An algorithm with no concept of identity has no incumbency to protect. It just reads. And it surfaces what’s best. If that works, it doesn’t just change a platform. It exposes something about every system that came before it. Every trending page, every algorithm, every feed that claimed to surface quality was never measuring quality. It was measuring proximity to power and calling it merit. We never had meritocracy. We had hierarchy with better marketing. Musk is building the first real one. And the question it forces isn’t whether you can compete. It’s whether your work was ever actually good, or you were just early. Everyone wants meritocracy. Almost nobody has ever lived in one.

Dustin

29,648 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

This eerie 10-minute sequence in "Cape Fear" (1991), where Robert De Niro's 'Max Cady' tricks Juliette Lewis' 'Danielle' into meeting with him at the high school is what convinced Martin Scorsese to do the movie. He considers it "the crux" of the entire film and said, “It was the scene that made me make the movie. I realized if I can pull off that scene, with the actors and the writer, it'd be great." De Niro explained that he wanted Max Cady to have the ability perform Charles Manson-like “mind trips” on his victims. So, he felt the necessity to have this scene. Lewis said, "When [the scene] was over, it was like I had to come down. I just went straight to [De Niro] and said, 'God, that was fun.'” The sequence became one of the film's most talked-about moments and helped Lewis nab an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actress. When Spielberg and De Niro were trying to convince Scorsese to direct the picture over dinner, he rejected it as he "didn't want to get involved in remakes. It's a really difficult thing to do, especially if [the original film] is a good picture.” To convince him somehow, Spielberg said to him, "Listen, if you don't like the script, you can rewrite it." Scorsese, who was suffering from fatigue after post-production work on "Goodfellas" (1990) jokingly said that he had forgotten about that part (Screenwriting) of the process. Martin Scorsese said high-energy chase sequences like this weren’t in his filmmaking wheelhouse, and he praised Spielberg for doing scenes like that “so beautifully,” while claiming his approach would have “become a cliche. I couldn't even bring myself to think about doing that sort of thing.” There wasn't any preparation for the scene. It was done in one take. About filming the scene, Scorsese said, "We froze and it was like magic." ("'Cape Fear' at 30: Why Martin Scorsese Needed Convincing to Direct Iconic Thriller (Flashback)", Joe Bergren, ET, 2021)

DepressedBergman

144,165 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Every major platform in history has run the same play. You’re about to watch it happen again. Jason Calacanis just went on record. He wants it clipped. He wants it shared. Calacanis: “If I was a developer of any kind, I would never work with Sam Altman and OpenAI.” This isn’t pessimism. It’s pattern recognition. And the pattern has a 40 year track record. Open. Invite. Reward. Study. Absorb. Eliminate. Microsoft let developers build Lotus 1-2-3. Then built Excel. Let them build WordPerfect. Then built Word. Flew them to conferences. Handed out awards. Studied everything. Then eliminated them. Zuckerberg ran the exact same play at Facebook. Zynga built billions in value on their platform. Then Zuckerberg shifted them without blinking. Calacanis: “Sam Altman comes from the Zuckerberg school of business. Give people access to your tools, study them, and like the Borg, steal every innovation they have.” This is how platforms grow. They don’t innovate at the edges. They let the ecosystem do it for them. Startups take the risk. Startups find the market. Startups prove the concept. Then the platform ships it natively and calls it a feature. Altman isn’t selling you compute. He’s selling you a front row seat to your own disruption. Calacanis: “This is a warning for anybody dumb enough to use Sam Altman’s OpenAI API. They are studying you.” OpenAI has the legal right to study how you use their API. You agreed to it. It’s in the terms. Every gap you find, you’re finding it for them first. Every dollar you make signals exactly where he should build next. We are at the exact same moment in AI that we were in the early internet. Developers flooded onto platforms. Built incredible things. Created real value. And handed the leverage to whoever owned the infrastructure beneath them. The AI gold rush feels different because the tools are more powerful. It isn’t different. You are not a founder. You are unpaid R&D. The builders who win the next decade won’t be the ones who used the best tools. They’ll be the ones who owned something the tools couldn’t absorb. Proprietary data. Distribution. A brand. A moat. History doesn’t warn you before it repeats. It just repeats. Thousands of developers are walking straight into this right now convinced they’re different. They’re not. Do not build your business on OpenAI. Build something he has to acquire or destroy.

Dustin

248,588 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Kurt Warner shares the lesson that changed his entire career and it applies to everything. He sat on the bench for 4 years in college. When a friend asked the coaches why he wasn't playing, the answer wasn't what he expected: "The reason I wasn't playing was because I was not very good in practice." His first reaction? Allen Iverson mode. "Practice? What're you talking about, practice?" But then he did the math. "In college we play 12 games in 365 days. In the NFL we play 16 games in 365 days." That's less than 5% of your year. "95% of our lives are lived in practice. And the biggest impression we make on people, the way people can understand and really realize who we are, is what we do every day in practice." This is the 95% Rule. And it applies to everything - sports, business, relationships, life. 1: Show Up With Your Best Effort - Compete and give your best every single day. People can't question how you show up - your effort, attitude, and actions. Consistency removes doubt. 2: Trust Is Built In Practice, Not Games - Trust is earned in the thousands of moments before it's given. Before you can be trusted, people want to know you're dependable. Every day. Not just when it matters. 3: Master Daily Consistency - Success isn't about intensity - it's about consistency. Your habits compound. What you do daily defines who you become. 4: Big Moments Are Earned In Small Moments - The little details make the biggest difference. Greatness starts with preparation - it's earned in the boredom of doing the work when no one's watching. Excellence isn't an event - It's a habit. Practice is where trust is built. How you show up daily is who you really are. (🎥 Passing the Torch Podcast) (🎥 Kurt Warner)

Coach AJ 🎯 Mental Fitness

1,270,658 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce