Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇮🇷🇺🇦 Michael Yon believes the wars dominating today's headlines aren't separate conflicts at all. The former Special Forces soldier argues that Ukraine, Iran, the Middle East and even future flashpoints around the world are all part of a much larger geopolitical process. Yon says most analysts get trapped in...

311,107 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Mr. Global Is Bleeding Economies Dry, Weakening Them for the Big Fight Later "Navigating the Omniwar: Those Who Are Prepared Will Be Able to Sail Through It with Michael Yon" By Elze van Hamelen Michael Yon (Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY) is a man of many hats: a former Green Beret, an entrepreneur, a writer, a war correspondent, a photographer, an avid traveler, and an eternal student. These experiences allow him to assemble intelligence from a wide range of sources and perspectives. In late November 2025, Yon and Catherine recorded a fascinating, high-information-density interview in which they discussed, among other things, weaponized migration and the taking over of trade routes by the Chinese. Their rich exchange resulted in a visit to the Netherlands by Yon and his wife, Masako Ganaha. During their stay, I conducted this follow-up interview to hear Yon’s take on the many aspects of Omniwar he and Ganaha observed while in my country. The Netherlands is at the heart of many of Mr. Global’s projects. With the Rotterdam harbor as the end point of the Silk Road, it is a strategic target—and targeted it is. As in Germany, climate policies are taking down the energy infrastructure, leading to effective deindustrialization of what were once top-performing economies. In addition, so-called “rewilding” policies are leading to the destruction of fertile farmland and the introduction of wolves in densely populated areas, which is terrorizing cattle, farmers, and civilians. Meanwhile, the country is flooded by migrants with cultural backgrounds that are hostile to the Dutch culture. Yon warns of the high likelihood that the combination of policies being implemented could lead to famine. However, he also reminds us that we all have ancestors who survived wars, famines, and other man-made or natural calamities. We don’t need to wait, like “sitting ducks,” for disaster to strike. For those who are willing to face reality as it is, resources are available to prepare and sail through the storms. In a year that has already started off with a bang, this is an interview that will help you get ready and navigate. Full Report: Subscribe to

The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

29,880 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Political Scientist Prof. Richard Sakwa says Trump keeps promising peace, but every war he touches is now escalating. Trump came back to the White House promising to end wars, not start new ones. Yet today, the U.S finds itself staring at three conflicts that are all becoming more dangerous at the same time: Iran, Ukraine, and Israel-Lebanon. His argument isn't simply that each war is getting worse, it's that they're beginning to bleed into one another; every crisis feeds the next. According to Prof. Sakwa, part of the reason is that Trump no longer seems able to hold a consistent position long enough to impose stability. One week he's praising negotiations, the next he's threatening to destroy Iran's bridges, power stations and desalination plants. For decades, America was viewed as the Middle East's security guarantor. Prof. Sakwa argues many countries in the region no longer see it that way. Instead, they increasingly see Washington as another source of instability, which is why Gulf states are looking more seriously at building a regional security order that doesn't depend entirely on the U.S. Trump still presents himself as the president who can end wars through force and dealmaking. Prof. Sakwa thinks the opposite is happening. He thinks every conflict Trump tries to manage is becoming harder to control, more interconnected and more dangerous than the one before. And if he's right, the biggest risk is that they all get pulled into something much larger.

Mario Nawfal

241,936 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

This scene adds so much to Boromir's death. He left a place where he was hailed as a hero, but perhaps also the lone hope of a country trapped in the shadow of Mordor. And if that evil is unleashed in full, Gondor will receive its wrath first. The weight of the burden he carries is tremendous from that alone. Add to that a doting father of whom he is both wary and weary, and a brother whom he loves and has to leave with that same father. From all of that he comes to Rivendell, a stranger, and from a country that represents man more than any other. And remember, "Men are weak." They allowed the Enemy to live on through that weakness. Nobody trusts them, therefore nobody trusts Boromir. And as it turns out, he is weak indeed. The Ring plays upon his despair. Tempts him to bring the quest to ruin in its earliest days. And perhaps the one person in whom he might find hope, Aragorn, spurns him and Gondor entirely. And then his weakness causes his greatest failure, as he tries to take the Ring for himself. But then he sees his error in his moment of greatest failure, and rather than succumbing to that failure, he rises and defends the Fellowship, defends the friends of the one he tried to harm, and friends of his own whom he had grown close to during the journey. He takes three arrows for these friends, and then, as he lay dying, Aragorn honors him and gives him hope that perhaps Gondor might be saved after all. And whether Boromir realized it or not before he died, Aragorn's resolve to become that man, to become the King of Gondor, starts with honoring a man who showed the weakness he feared, and yet overcame it in the end. Boromir is, in a sense, a repentant version of Isildor. And in that, Boromir dies not in dishonor, but as the hero we saw in Faramir's memories.

Tolkien Universe

20,254 просмотров • 7 дней назад

Military Analyst Elijah Magnier thinks the Iran war didn't end, it just moved. Most people are still watching Tehran, waiting to see whether America or Israel strikes Iran again. Elijah thinks they're watching the wrong battlefield. His argument is that the next phase of this conflict won't be fought primarily inside Iran. It will be fought across Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, and Yemen, where the real objective isn't to attack Iran directly, but to slowly dismantle the network of allies that has protected it for decades. That made a lot of the recent headlines suddenly look very different. The anti-corruption drive in Iraq, the push to disarm Iraqi militias, the renewed mobilization of Saudi and UAE-backed forces inside Yemen, and the talk about Syria confronting Hezbollah. Elijah believes these aren't isolated events; they're all pieces of the same long-term strategy: to isolate Iran step by step until it stands alone. Then he explained why he thinks the Strait of Hormuz has become so important. Washington sees Hormuz as an economic problem, but Iran sees it as leverage. As long as Israel remains in Lebanon, Iranian assets remain frozen, and the wider agreement remains unfulfilled, Elijah says Tehran has no reason to surrender the strongest bargaining chip it still holds. That's why he believes the current ceasefire changes very little. In his view, the war never really stopped; it simply shifted into a different phase. The direct confrontation became too costly for everyone, so now the pressure moves onto Iran's partners instead. By the end of the interview, I wasn't thinking about one war anymore. I was thinking about four separate conflicts that may actually be the same war playing out on different fronts. And if Elijah is right, what we're watching is the opening chapter of a much longer regional campaign. Elijah J. Magnier 🇪🇺

Mario Nawfal

222,988 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад