正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

返回首页

🇺🇦🇮🇷 Michael Yon says global conflicts only make sense if viewed through what he calls a broader "depopulation war." The former war correspondent argues that wars, food systems, public health, and regional instability are not isolated events but part of a single overarching strategy. Drawing on his past research...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,777,662 subscribers

75,486 次观看 • 1 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

🇮🇷🇺🇦 Michael Yon believes the wars dominating today's headlines aren't separate conflicts at all. The former Special Forces soldier argues that Ukraine, Iran, the Middle East and even future flashpoints around the world are all part of a much larger geopolitical process. Yon says most analysts get trapped in the tactical details, asking who fired first, which missile landed where, or who escalated last. Instead, he argues every major conflict should be viewed through three lenses: routes, resources and ideology. From that perspective, he claims today's wars are not isolated crises but interconnected pieces of a long-running global struggle. His most controversial claim is that the apparent chaos isn't incompetence at all. According to Yon, many decisions that look irrational are actually deliberate acts of sabotage serving a broader objective. He argues that what people dismiss as political failure often makes sense once viewed through what he calls "grand strategy," rather than day-to-day military events. That leads to his central thesis. Yon believes the ultimate objective behind many of today's conflicts is global depopulation. He points to wars, energy disruptions, food supply issues and other crises as parts of what he sees as a coordinated long-term campaign rather than disconnected events. In his view, today's wars are merely one phase of a much older conflict that predates the current generation of political leaders. Thank you Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY for this conversation
40:05

🇮🇷🇺🇦 Michael Yon believes the wars dominating today's headlines aren't separate conflicts at all. The former Special Forces soldier argues that Ukraine, Iran, the Middle East and even future flashpoints around the world are all part of a much larger geopolitical process. Yon says most analysts get trapped in the tactical details, asking who fired first, which missile landed where, or who escalated last. Instead, he argues every major conflict should be viewed through three lenses: routes, resources and ideology. From that perspective, he claims today's wars are not isolated crises but interconnected pieces of a long-running global struggle. His most controversial claim is that the apparent chaos isn't incompetence at all. According to Yon, many decisions that look irrational are actually deliberate acts of sabotage serving a broader objective. He argues that what people dismiss as political failure often makes sense once viewed through what he calls "grand strategy," rather than day-to-day military events. That leads to his central thesis. Yon believes the ultimate objective behind many of today's conflicts is global depopulation. He points to wars, energy disruptions, food supply issues and other crises as parts of what he sees as a coordinated long-term campaign rather than disconnected events. In his view, today's wars are merely one phase of a much older conflict that predates the current generation of political leaders. Thank you Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY for this conversation

Mario Nawfal

311,107 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸 Michael Yon argues today's geopolitical crises are being driven by competing long-term agendas, not just conventional military strategy. The former war correspondent says analysts focusing on missiles, shipping lanes, and troop movements are missing what he calls the "grand strategy" above it all. Yon claims famine, mass migration, and regional conflicts are unfolding as interconnected pressures that reshape populations and global power. According to him, the conflicts dominating today's headlines are only the visible layer of a much broader geopolitical struggle. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY
2:58

🇺🇸 Michael Yon argues today's geopolitical crises are being driven by competing long-term agendas, not just conventional military strategy. The former war correspondent says analysts focusing on missiles, shipping lanes, and troop movements are missing what he calls the "grand strategy" above it all. Yon claims famine, mass migration, and regional conflicts are unfolding as interconnected pressures that reshape populations and global power. According to him, the conflicts dominating today's headlines are only the visible layer of a much broader geopolitical struggle. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

Mario Nawfal

52,788 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸 Michael Yon argues recent U.S. military decisions make little sense unless viewed as deliberate acts of national sabotage. The former war correspondent claims Washington's actions, including strikes on Iran and the depletion of strategic resources, are not policy failures but part of a broader agenda. Yon also alleges Trump is "part of the system," rejecting the idea that current developments are accidental or merely strategic miscalculations. According to Yon, what many observers dismiss as incompetence is, in his view, intentional sabotage carried out under the appearance of conventional policymaking. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY
2:00

🇺🇸 Michael Yon argues recent U.S. military decisions make little sense unless viewed as deliberate acts of national sabotage. The former war correspondent claims Washington's actions, including strikes on Iran and the depletion of strategic resources, are not policy failures but part of a broader agenda. Yon also alleges Trump is "part of the system," rejecting the idea that current developments are accidental or merely strategic miscalculations. According to Yon, what many observers dismiss as incompetence is, in his view, intentional sabotage carried out under the appearance of conventional policymaking. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

Mario Nawfal

32,689 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸 Michael Yon argues that talk of an imminent peace deal should be treated with caution. He believes the current negotiations are part of a recurring pattern he describes as "fight, fight, talk, talk," rather than evidence that the conflict is truly ending. In his view, today's ceasefires and memorandums are pauses in a much longer geopolitical struggle, not its conclusion. "I don't think it's over... This is a process war." Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY
4:50

🇺🇸 Michael Yon argues that talk of an imminent peace deal should be treated with caution. He believes the current negotiations are part of a recurring pattern he describes as "fight, fight, talk, talk," rather than evidence that the conflict is truly ending. In his view, today's ceasefires and memorandums are pauses in a much longer geopolitical struggle, not its conclusion. "I don't think it's over... This is a process war." Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

Mario Nawfal

96,089 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸 MICHAEL YON: “READING IS A WEAPON SYSTEM” War correspondent Michael Yon explains why understanding history can make today's events look far less surprising. He recalls meeting General James Mattis in Iraq — and the first thing Mattis asked him was: “What are you reading?” Yon makes a simple but important point: the more history you read, the more you realise that many of the patterns unfolding around us are not new at all. Different names. Different dates. Same human behaviour. “Sometimes you just have to change the names and the dates.” This is why history matters. Watch. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY
1:18

🇺🇸 MICHAEL YON: “READING IS A WEAPON SYSTEM” War correspondent Michael Yon explains why understanding history can make today's events look far less surprising. He recalls meeting General James Mattis in Iraq — and the first thing Mattis asked him was: “What are you reading?” Yon makes a simple but important point: the more history you read, the more you realise that many of the patterns unfolding around us are not new at all. Different names. Different dates. Same human behaviour. “Sometimes you just have to change the names and the dates.” This is why history matters. Watch. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

Jim Ferguson

12,320 次观看 • 12 天前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Michael Yon says focusing on Iran itself misses the bigger picture. In his view, the real conflict is about who controls the world's arteries. "The fights are about routes, resources and ideology." Every major war, from World War I to today, follows that same formula. His historical example is striking. The Berlin-to-Baghdad railway threatened Britain's control of the Suez route over a century ago. Today, he believes China's Belt and Road corridors pose a similar challenge to American maritime dominance, making places like Hormuz, Gibraltar, Panama and the Black Sea pieces of the same geopolitical puzzle. That framework also explains why he's watching Morocco. Most people saw the recent migration pressure on Spain's enclave of Ceuta as a border crisis. Yon sees something much bigger. Control over the Strait of Gibraltar has been contested for centuries, and Morocco is becoming another pressure point in that struggle. His conclusion is simple. Stop thinking in terms of isolated wars. Iran. Ukraine. Panama. Morocco. Argentina. Yon believes they're all chapters in the same contest over who controls the trade routes, resources and choke points that underpin global power. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY
41:41

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Michael Yon says focusing on Iran itself misses the bigger picture. In his view, the real conflict is about who controls the world's arteries. "The fights are about routes, resources and ideology." Every major war, from World War I to today, follows that same formula. His historical example is striking. The Berlin-to-Baghdad railway threatened Britain's control of the Suez route over a century ago. Today, he believes China's Belt and Road corridors pose a similar challenge to American maritime dominance, making places like Hormuz, Gibraltar, Panama and the Black Sea pieces of the same geopolitical puzzle. That framework also explains why he's watching Morocco. Most people saw the recent migration pressure on Spain's enclave of Ceuta as a border crisis. Yon sees something much bigger. Control over the Strait of Gibraltar has been contested for centuries, and Morocco is becoming another pressure point in that struggle. His conclusion is simple. Stop thinking in terms of isolated wars. Iran. Ukraine. Panama. Morocco. Argentina. Yon believes they're all chapters in the same contest over who controls the trade routes, resources and choke points that underpin global power. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

Mario Nawfal

277,164 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨🇺🇸MICHAEL YON: “WE ARE ENTERING DANGEROUS TERRITORY” — WHAT COMES NEXT COULD RESHAPE THE WORLD Former US Special Forces soldier and veteran war correspondent Michael Yon joins me for a wide-ranging and at times explosive conversation about the forces now reshaping our world. We examine the escalating conflicts surrounding Russia and Iran, the possibility of a wider confrontation involving the major powers, and the growing strategic importance of the world's critical maritime routes. But we go much further. Europe. Migration. Food. Energy. War. Strategic resources. The Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Gibraltar. And what happens if several of these pressure points begin to converge at the same time. Yon has spent years on the ground in war zones and geopolitical flashpoints. He doesn't pull his punches — and some of his conclusions will be highly controversial. You don't have to agree with everything he says. But this is a conversation worth hearing. Watch the full interview. Listen carefully. Make up your own mind. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY
1:23:31

🚨🇺🇸MICHAEL YON: “WE ARE ENTERING DANGEROUS TERRITORY” — WHAT COMES NEXT COULD RESHAPE THE WORLD Former US Special Forces soldier and veteran war correspondent Michael Yon joins me for a wide-ranging and at times explosive conversation about the forces now reshaping our world. We examine the escalating conflicts surrounding Russia and Iran, the possibility of a wider confrontation involving the major powers, and the growing strategic importance of the world's critical maritime routes. But we go much further. Europe. Migration. Food. Energy. War. Strategic resources. The Strait of Hormuz. The Strait of Gibraltar. And what happens if several of these pressure points begin to converge at the same time. Yon has spent years on the ground in war zones and geopolitical flashpoints. He doesn't pull his punches — and some of his conclusions will be highly controversial. You don't have to agree with everything he says. But this is a conversation worth hearing. Watch the full interview. Listen carefully. Make up your own mind. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY

Jim Ferguson

36,811 次观看 • 26 天前

🇵🇰🇸🇦 Pakistan is edging toward the Houthi war, and a Green Beret turned war correspondent says the prize behind that door is a Chinese port Michael Yon stopped tracking the daily strikes months ago. From Japan, he watches the shape of the whole thing, and his conclusion is blunt: "It's the exact same war, just in a different parking lot" The Middle East, the Falklands, Panama, Taiwan, all of it one war in his reading. Pakistan's threat to defend Saudi Arabia matters, he argues, because the moment Pakistan is in, a single attack blamed on Islamabad becomes the excuse to hit Gwadar, China's Belt and Road port on the Arabian Sea. His darker forecast is WATER. Ethiopia's new dam can release twice what flows into it, and Egypt lives almost entirely on the Nile downstream. Dams that can be cascaded are the weapons of the next decade. Yon frames all of this as a Zionist grand strategy aimed at China. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY Brandon Weichert
55:33

🇵🇰🇸🇦 Pakistan is edging toward the Houthi war, and a Green Beret turned war correspondent says the prize behind that door is a Chinese port Michael Yon stopped tracking the daily strikes months ago. From Japan, he watches the shape of the whole thing, and his conclusion is blunt: "It's the exact same war, just in a different parking lot" The Middle East, the Falklands, Panama, Taiwan, all of it one war in his reading. Pakistan's threat to defend Saudi Arabia matters, he argues, because the moment Pakistan is in, a single attack blamed on Islamabad becomes the excuse to hit Gwadar, China's Belt and Road port on the Arabian Sea. His darker forecast is WATER. Ethiopia's new dam can release twice what flows into it, and Egypt lives almost entirely on the Nile downstream. Dams that can be cascaded are the weapons of the next decade. Yon frames all of this as a Zionist grand strategy aimed at China. Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY Brandon Weichert

Mario Nawfal

232,272 次观看 • 7 天前

🚨 STRAIT OF HORMUZ STANDOFF COULD TRIGGER GLOBAL SHIPPING CRISIS Analyst Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY is warning the situation around the Strait of Hormuz is far more serious than many realize. According to Yon, major shipping companies are already staying out of the waterway - not necessarily because it’s physically closed, but because insurance markets are refusing to cover ships entering the conflict zone. “Nobody big is going through right now,” Yon said, pointing to major players like Maersk avoiding the route entirely. That matters because the Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world, carrying a massive share of global oil shipments. Yon also warned that if tensions escalate and U.S. warships attempt to force passage, they could face direct attacks. “The ships could take fire… they could be sunk,” he said. His broader warning: if shipping through the strait collapses, it could trigger a cascading global economic shock affecting energy, shipping, and supply chains.
4:27

🚨 STRAIT OF HORMUZ STANDOFF COULD TRIGGER GLOBAL SHIPPING CRISIS Analyst Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY is warning the situation around the Strait of Hormuz is far more serious than many realize. According to Yon, major shipping companies are already staying out of the waterway - not necessarily because it’s physically closed, but because insurance markets are refusing to cover ships entering the conflict zone. “Nobody big is going through right now,” Yon said, pointing to major players like Maersk avoiding the route entirely. That matters because the Strait of Hormuz is one of the most critical energy chokepoints in the world, carrying a massive share of global oil shipments. Yon also warned that if tensions escalate and U.S. warships attempt to force passage, they could face direct attacks. “The ships could take fire… they could be sunk,” he said. His broader warning: if shipping through the strait collapses, it could trigger a cascading global economic shock affecting energy, shipping, and supply chains.

LindellTV

13,551 次观看 • 6 个月前

Mr. Global Is Bleeding Economies Dry, Weakening Them for the Big Fight Later "Navigating the Omniwar: Those Who Are Prepared Will Be Able to Sail Through It with Michael Yon" By Elze van Hamelen Michael Yon (Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY) is a man of many hats: a former Green Beret, an entrepreneur, a writer, a war correspondent, a photographer, an avid traveler, and an eternal student. These experiences allow him to assemble intelligence from a wide range of sources and perspectives. In late November 2025, Yon and Catherine recorded a fascinating, high-information-density interview in which they discussed, among other things, weaponized migration and the taking over of trade routes by the Chinese. Their rich exchange resulted in a visit to the Netherlands by Yon and his wife, Masako Ganaha. During their stay, I conducted this follow-up interview to hear Yon’s take on the many aspects of Omniwar he and Ganaha observed while in my country. The Netherlands is at the heart of many of Mr. Global’s projects. With the Rotterdam harbor as the end point of the Silk Road, it is a strategic target—and targeted it is. As in Germany, climate policies are taking down the energy infrastructure, leading to effective deindustrialization of what were once top-performing economies. In addition, so-called “rewilding” policies are leading to the destruction of fertile farmland and the introduction of wolves in densely populated areas, which is terrorizing cattle, farmers, and civilians. Meanwhile, the country is flooded by migrants with cultural backgrounds that are hostile to the Dutch culture. Yon warns of the high likelihood that the combination of policies being implemented could lead to famine. However, he also reminds us that we all have ancestors who survived wars, famines, and other man-made or natural calamities. We don’t need to wait, like “sitting ducks,” for disaster to strike. For those who are willing to face reality as it is, resources are available to prepare and sail through the storms. In a year that has already started off with a bang, this is an interview that will help you get ready and navigate. Full Report: Subscribe to
0:44

Mr. Global Is Bleeding Economies Dry, Weakening Them for the Big Fight Later "Navigating the Omniwar: Those Who Are Prepared Will Be Able to Sail Through It with Michael Yon" By Elze van Hamelen Michael Yon (Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY) is a man of many hats: a former Green Beret, an entrepreneur, a writer, a war correspondent, a photographer, an avid traveler, and an eternal student. These experiences allow him to assemble intelligence from a wide range of sources and perspectives. In late November 2025, Yon and Catherine recorded a fascinating, high-information-density interview in which they discussed, among other things, weaponized migration and the taking over of trade routes by the Chinese. Their rich exchange resulted in a visit to the Netherlands by Yon and his wife, Masako Ganaha. During their stay, I conducted this follow-up interview to hear Yon’s take on the many aspects of Omniwar he and Ganaha observed while in my country. The Netherlands is at the heart of many of Mr. Global’s projects. With the Rotterdam harbor as the end point of the Silk Road, it is a strategic target—and targeted it is. As in Germany, climate policies are taking down the energy infrastructure, leading to effective deindustrialization of what were once top-performing economies. In addition, so-called “rewilding” policies are leading to the destruction of fertile farmland and the introduction of wolves in densely populated areas, which is terrorizing cattle, farmers, and civilians. Meanwhile, the country is flooded by migrants with cultural backgrounds that are hostile to the Dutch culture. Yon warns of the high likelihood that the combination of policies being implemented could lead to famine. However, he also reminds us that we all have ancestors who survived wars, famines, and other man-made or natural calamities. We don’t need to wait, like “sitting ducks,” for disaster to strike. For those who are willing to face reality as it is, resources are available to prepare and sail through the storms. In a year that has already started off with a bang, this is an interview that will help you get ready and navigate. Full Report: Subscribe to

The Solari Report | Catherine Austin Fitts

29,880 次观看 • 7 个月前

Something is quietly breaking beneath the surface of global events—and most people aren’t seeing it. While headlines fixate on war and geopolitics, a far more dangerous chain reaction is unfolding behind the scenes, one that could hit every grocery store, every supply chain, and every household all at once. War correspondent Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY has spent years tracking these patterns across continents. Now, he says the pieces are finally locking into place—and the result could be a level of famine the modern world has never experienced. If he’s right, what comes next won’t look like war as we know it. It will look like scarcity… and survival. 🧵
2:41

Something is quietly breaking beneath the surface of global events—and most people aren’t seeing it. While headlines fixate on war and geopolitics, a far more dangerous chain reaction is unfolding behind the scenes, one that could hit every grocery store, every supply chain, and every household all at once. War correspondent Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY has spent years tracking these patterns across continents. Now, he says the pieces are finally locking into place—and the result could be a level of famine the modern world has never experienced. If he’s right, what comes next won’t look like war as we know it. It will look like scarcity… and survival. 🧵

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

193,570 次观看 • 5 个月前

Economist Viktor Efimov says Russia needs to stop obsessing over criticising the West and start defining its own project. “Victory is not victory in war, but victory over wars,” he says, insisting that this requires a deeply developed “ecosystem of creation.” His point is that each civilisation should live according to its own model, rather than trying to force everyone into one ideological column. "There's no need to line everyone up in one column: capitalist, communist, or whatever else,” Efimov says. “Let everyone live as they think necessary. But they shouldn't teach others to live the same way they do.” He believes that Russia’s real problem is the absence of a positive agenda. “All our attention and efforts are directed at criticising the West,” he says. “But why should we criticise? We have no agenda of our own. We are not dealing with the question: what are we building? What do we ourselves want?”
0:58

Economist Viktor Efimov says Russia needs to stop obsessing over criticising the West and start defining its own project. “Victory is not victory in war, but victory over wars,” he says, insisting that this requires a deeply developed “ecosystem of creation.” His point is that each civilisation should live according to its own model, rather than trying to force everyone into one ideological column. "There's no need to line everyone up in one column: capitalist, communist, or whatever else,” Efimov says. “Let everyone live as they think necessary. But they shouldn't teach others to live the same way they do.” He believes that Russia’s real problem is the absence of a positive agenda. “All our attention and efforts are directed at criticising the West,” he says. “But why should we criticise? We have no agenda of our own. We are not dealing with the question: what are we building? What do we ourselves want?”

Brian McDonald

22,920 次观看 • 3 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Philip Pilkington believes the biggest mistake Washington could make is targeting Iran's energy infrastructure. Not because it would fail to inflict damage. But because it could lock the global economy into a crisis that lasts far longer than the war itself. According to Philip, oil markets have remained surprisingly calm because investors still assume escalation can be contained. He argues that assumption disappears the moment energy infrastructure becomes a battlefield. His point is that repairing pipelines, export terminals and refineries takes months, sometimes more than a year. Every strike extends the disruption. Even if the fighting ends quickly, the economic consequences don't. Philip also believes Washington has relied on the ability to repeatedly de-escalate whenever oil prices threatened to spike. If that option disappears, he argues, markets will be forced to confront risks they have largely ignored. His warning goes beyond oil. He believes a prolonged energy shock would hit major importers like Japan first, expose deeper cracks in the global financial system, and eventually put pressure on the U.S. dollar itself. In his view, striking Iran's energy infrastructure wouldn't end the crisis. It would simply make it much harder to stop. Philip Pilkington
37:12

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Philip Pilkington believes the biggest mistake Washington could make is targeting Iran's energy infrastructure. Not because it would fail to inflict damage. But because it could lock the global economy into a crisis that lasts far longer than the war itself. According to Philip, oil markets have remained surprisingly calm because investors still assume escalation can be contained. He argues that assumption disappears the moment energy infrastructure becomes a battlefield. His point is that repairing pipelines, export terminals and refineries takes months, sometimes more than a year. Every strike extends the disruption. Even if the fighting ends quickly, the economic consequences don't. Philip also believes Washington has relied on the ability to repeatedly de-escalate whenever oil prices threatened to spike. If that option disappears, he argues, markets will be forced to confront risks they have largely ignored. His warning goes beyond oil. He believes a prolonged energy shock would hit major importers like Japan first, expose deeper cracks in the global financial system, and eventually put pressure on the U.S. dollar itself. In his view, striking Iran's energy infrastructure wouldn't end the crisis. It would simply make it much harder to stop. Philip Pilkington

Mario Nawfal

270,753 次观看 • 1 个月前

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump has restarted a war he no longer controls, and Iran intends to make escape painfully difficult Middle East analyst Trita Parsi says Trump believed he could inflict enough military pressure to force Iran back to the negotiating table, then declare victory and end the conflict whenever it became politically convenient. Instead, rather than giving him an easy off-ramp, Iran is trying to make the war so costly that he never thinks of doing it again. That's why Trita believes the economic pressure matters just as much as the missiles, because every additional cost increases the political pain of continuing the conflict. At the heart of the war is the Strait of Hormuz, and Trita argues this isn't really about shipping fees; it's about leverage. Iran believes control of the Strait is its single biggest deterrent against a full-scale American attack. Give that up, and Washington can launch another war with far fewer consequences. That's why he says Tehran is extremely unlikely to compromise on the issue, regardless of the military pressure. His warning is that this creates a dangerous cycle, because every failed attempt to force a breakthrough creates pressure for another escalation. Trita says that's how wars stop being short campaigns and start becoming open-ended conflicts. He puts the chances of the fighting escalating over the next month at more than 80%. Not because either side necessarily wants a forever war, but because both sides now believe backing down today makes an even bigger war tomorrow more likely. Trita Parsi
24:15

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Trump has restarted a war he no longer controls, and Iran intends to make escape painfully difficult Middle East analyst Trita Parsi says Trump believed he could inflict enough military pressure to force Iran back to the negotiating table, then declare victory and end the conflict whenever it became politically convenient. Instead, rather than giving him an easy off-ramp, Iran is trying to make the war so costly that he never thinks of doing it again. That's why Trita believes the economic pressure matters just as much as the missiles, because every additional cost increases the political pain of continuing the conflict. At the heart of the war is the Strait of Hormuz, and Trita argues this isn't really about shipping fees; it's about leverage. Iran believes control of the Strait is its single biggest deterrent against a full-scale American attack. Give that up, and Washington can launch another war with far fewer consequences. That's why he says Tehran is extremely unlikely to compromise on the issue, regardless of the military pressure. His warning is that this creates a dangerous cycle, because every failed attempt to force a breakthrough creates pressure for another escalation. Trita says that's how wars stop being short campaigns and start becoming open-ended conflicts. He puts the chances of the fighting escalating over the next month at more than 80%. Not because either side necessarily wants a forever war, but because both sides now believe backing down today makes an even bigger war tomorrow more likely. Trita Parsi

Mario Nawfal

280,503 次观看 • 1 个月前

Gareth Icke: Manufacturing Consent For Endless War | Wide Awake Media Podcast #20 The latest episode of the Wide Awake Media podcast features truth-teller, activist and Ickonic Media presenter Gareth Icke, in a detailed analysis of information control, global conflict, and the psychological mechanisms shaping public perception. Icke explores how narratives are constructed to trigger emotional responses, arguing that fear and repetition are used to steer public opinion in predictable directions. He contends that wars in the Middle East are not organic conflicts but managed events—used to justify expansion, control populations, and reshape global power structures. The conversation examines narratives surrounding Israel, Iran, and the October 7 attacks, questioning official accounts and highlighting what Icke sees as deliberate manipulation of public opinion. He also criticises Donald Trump, accusing him of ultimately serving the same system he claims to oppose. Pointing to the growing unpopularity of conflict with Iran, Icke warns of the increasing likelihood of major false flag events designed to shift public support in favour of escalation. Despite this, he emphasises the importance of individual responsibility, truth-telling, and rebuilding real-world communities as the foundation for resistance.
56:57

Gareth Icke: Manufacturing Consent For Endless War | Wide Awake Media Podcast #20 The latest episode of the Wide Awake Media podcast features truth-teller, activist and Ickonic Media presenter Gareth Icke, in a detailed analysis of information control, global conflict, and the psychological mechanisms shaping public perception. Icke explores how narratives are constructed to trigger emotional responses, arguing that fear and repetition are used to steer public opinion in predictable directions. He contends that wars in the Middle East are not organic conflicts but managed events—used to justify expansion, control populations, and reshape global power structures. The conversation examines narratives surrounding Israel, Iran, and the October 7 attacks, questioning official accounts and highlighting what Icke sees as deliberate manipulation of public opinion. He also criticises Donald Trump, accusing him of ultimately serving the same system he claims to oppose. Pointing to the growing unpopularity of conflict with Iran, Icke warns of the increasing likelihood of major false flag events designed to shift public support in favour of escalation. Despite this, he emphasises the importance of individual responsibility, truth-telling, and rebuilding real-world communities as the foundation for resistance.

Wide Awake Media

54,407 次观看 • 5 个月前

Political Scientist Prof. Richard Sakwa says Trump keeps promising peace, but every war he touches is now escalating. Trump came back to the White House promising to end wars, not start new ones. Yet today, the U.S finds itself staring at three conflicts that are all becoming more dangerous at the same time: Iran, Ukraine, and Israel-Lebanon. His argument isn't simply that each war is getting worse, it's that they're beginning to bleed into one another; every crisis feeds the next. According to Prof. Sakwa, part of the reason is that Trump no longer seems able to hold a consistent position long enough to impose stability. One week he's praising negotiations, the next he's threatening to destroy Iran's bridges, power stations and desalination plants. For decades, America was viewed as the Middle East's security guarantor. Prof. Sakwa argues many countries in the region no longer see it that way. Instead, they increasingly see Washington as another source of instability, which is why Gulf states are looking more seriously at building a regional security order that doesn't depend entirely on the U.S. Trump still presents himself as the president who can end wars through force and dealmaking. Prof. Sakwa thinks the opposite is happening. He thinks every conflict Trump tries to manage is becoming harder to control, more interconnected and more dangerous than the one before. And if he's right, the biggest risk is that they all get pulled into something much larger.
32:49

Political Scientist Prof. Richard Sakwa says Trump keeps promising peace, but every war he touches is now escalating. Trump came back to the White House promising to end wars, not start new ones. Yet today, the U.S finds itself staring at three conflicts that are all becoming more dangerous at the same time: Iran, Ukraine, and Israel-Lebanon. His argument isn't simply that each war is getting worse, it's that they're beginning to bleed into one another; every crisis feeds the next. According to Prof. Sakwa, part of the reason is that Trump no longer seems able to hold a consistent position long enough to impose stability. One week he's praising negotiations, the next he's threatening to destroy Iran's bridges, power stations and desalination plants. For decades, America was viewed as the Middle East's security guarantor. Prof. Sakwa argues many countries in the region no longer see it that way. Instead, they increasingly see Washington as another source of instability, which is why Gulf states are looking more seriously at building a regional security order that doesn't depend entirely on the U.S. Trump still presents himself as the president who can end wars through force and dealmaking. Prof. Sakwa thinks the opposite is happening. He thinks every conflict Trump tries to manage is becoming harder to control, more interconnected and more dangerous than the one before. And if he's right, the biggest risk is that they all get pulled into something much larger.

Mario Nawfal

241,936 次观看 • 2 个月前

RFK Jr. is declaring an end to the FDA's "war on alternative medicine." He argues that the agency has overstepped its role, shifting from a body that provides scientific guidance to one that restricts medical freedom. Why is there a war on healing substances like stem cells, peptides, vitamins, and minerals? His solution? The FDA should do the science and inform the public, but stop acting as a gatekeeper that denies Americans and their doctors the right to choose these treatments. He points to a shocking statistic: pharmaceutical drugs are the third leading cause of death in the U.S. With this as the status quo, he questions why safe, natural alternatives are so heavily restricted. His powerful conclusion? It's time to trust the intelligence and intuition of the American people to make their own health choices, rather than leaving our well-being solely in the hands of Big Pharma.
2:28

RFK Jr. is declaring an end to the FDA's "war on alternative medicine." He argues that the agency has overstepped its role, shifting from a body that provides scientific guidance to one that restricts medical freedom. Why is there a war on healing substances like stem cells, peptides, vitamins, and minerals? His solution? The FDA should do the science and inform the public, but stop acting as a gatekeeper that denies Americans and their doctors the right to choose these treatments. He points to a shocking statistic: pharmaceutical drugs are the third leading cause of death in the U.S. With this as the status quo, he questions why safe, natural alternatives are so heavily restricted. His powerful conclusion? It's time to trust the intelligence and intuition of the American people to make their own health choices, rather than leaving our well-being solely in the hands of Big Pharma.

Camus

197,927 次观看 • 1 年前

VP Vance tells story of a phone call he had with Charlie Kirk before knocking out Iran's nuclear facilities "Charlie did not always agree with our policies. Charlie Kirk called me and he was mad and he said, 'JD, I'm really worried that was is going on in the Middle East is going to lead the United States into a protracted military conflict.' I've never told anybody that. Charlie was really worried about that in the final months of his life. And I really believed that one of the reasons why the president knocked out the Iranian nuclear facilities but never got the United States into a protracted military conflict and never lost a single American in a Middle Eastern conflict is because we had the wisdom and the good sense to recognize that the American People are done with American troops dying in unnecessary foreign conflicts. Charlie Kirk reminded me of that. Charlie Kirk."
1:30

VP Vance tells story of a phone call he had with Charlie Kirk before knocking out Iran's nuclear facilities "Charlie did not always agree with our policies. Charlie Kirk called me and he was mad and he said, 'JD, I'm really worried that was is going on in the Middle East is going to lead the United States into a protracted military conflict.' I've never told anybody that. Charlie was really worried about that in the final months of his life. And I really believed that one of the reasons why the president knocked out the Iranian nuclear facilities but never got the United States into a protracted military conflict and never lost a single American in a Middle Eastern conflict is because we had the wisdom and the good sense to recognize that the American People are done with American troops dying in unnecessary foreign conflicts. Charlie Kirk reminded me of that. Charlie Kirk."

TheBlaze

545,092 次观看 • 10 个月前