Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

MICROPHONE UPDATE: Charlie was wearing a Rode Wireless PRO, which comes standard with a lapel magnet, 2 storage cases + computer dock, 32-bit sound, and internal device recording & storage. ▪️The moment that mic was removed from its case, it was recording. ▪️The mic could only be turned off... remotely—neither Charlie nor the security team could have turned it off. ▪️All audio was captured & recorded on the mic itself. The 32-bit sound captures quiet whispers, loud shouts & everything in between. ▪️Mikey McCoy filmed a close-up video of Charlie getting mic'd up. Mikey, where's that video? Hey Philip Goldsberry and Terryl Farnsworth: where's Charlie's audio from that day? The public has a right to hear that audio. More importantly, it's holding extremely valuable evidence. (unless it was exploded, in which case those 32-bit recordings would be completely gone...). Is there audio from immediately after Charlie's death? Who else thinks TPUSA should have to release that audio?show more

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

139,962 subscribers

675,622 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

🚨FOLLOW-UP: Jason Chaffetz Just Dropped a CRITICAL Detail About “Microphone Problems” at UVU — Right BEFORE Charlie Kirk Was Killed🤔 In one of the earliest interviews after the assassination, Jason Chaffetz (who was there that day) described the scene: “Charlie came out… they were having a little bit of a microphone problem. But everybody was chanting USA or Charlie Kirk… they were genuinely excited to see him.” What microphone problems? Was it the Rode wireless lapel mic Charlie was wearing? Or the handheld microphone he was gripping the moment of the “bang”? Because here’s what we already know from the evidence I posted yesterday: Dark marks/burn-like injuries on Charlie’s left hand (the one holding the mic) in both the UVU stills and the casket photo. Tiny black shards scattered under the tent and found inside the SUV that rushed him to the hospital — consistent with the material used in Rode wireless lapel mics and receivers. The audio tech visibly flinching before the big bang. Terryl Farnsworth immediately ripping the camera down, removing the SD cards, and tampering with evidence within minutes. Now add Chaffetz confirming microphone problems that day. This lines up disturbingly well with the theory that Charlie was taken out by an exploding microphone pack — similar to the PETN-rigged pager attacks Israel used on Hamas. Small charge. Remote detonation. Minimal visible residue. Maximum lethality. If they were already having mic issues that morning, it raises the obvious question: Was the mic tampered with? Was the problem the setup for the kill shot? TPUSA owes the public — and Charlie’s family — full transparency. What exactly were these “microphone problems”? Which mic was affected? Why has no one explained this? We’re not letting this go. The American people deserve answers. If you have any info on the AV setup that day, the mics used, or what Chaffetz meant, DM me immediately. Full anonymity guaranteed. RT this. Tag Turning Point USA. Tag Candace Owens Baron Coleman The more pressure we apply, the harder it is for them to hide.

🚨FOLLOW-UP: Jason Chaffetz Just Dropped a CRITICAL Detail About “Microphone Problems” at UVU — Right BEFORE Charlie Kirk Was Killed🤔 In one of the earliest interviews after the assassination, Jason Chaffetz (who was there that day) described the scene: “Charlie came out… they were having a little bit of a microphone problem. But everybody was chanting USA or Charlie Kirk… they were genuinely excited to see him.” What microphone problems? Was it the Rode wireless lapel mic Charlie was wearing? Or the handheld microphone he was gripping the moment of the “bang”? Because here’s what we already know from the evidence I posted yesterday: Dark marks/burn-like injuries on Charlie’s left hand (the one holding the mic) in both the UVU stills and the casket photo. Tiny black shards scattered under the tent and found inside the SUV that rushed him to the hospital — consistent with the material used in Rode wireless lapel mics and receivers. The audio tech visibly flinching before the big bang. Terryl Farnsworth immediately ripping the camera down, removing the SD cards, and tampering with evidence within minutes. Now add Chaffetz confirming microphone problems that day. This lines up disturbingly well with the theory that Charlie was taken out by an exploding microphone pack — similar to the PETN-rigged pager attacks Israel used on Hamas. Small charge. Remote detonation. Minimal visible residue. Maximum lethality. If they were already having mic issues that morning, it raises the obvious question: Was the mic tampered with? Was the problem the setup for the kill shot? TPUSA owes the public — and Charlie’s family — full transparency. What exactly were these “microphone problems”? Which mic was affected? Why has no one explained this? We’re not letting this go. The American people deserve answers. If you have any info on the AV setup that day, the mics used, or what Chaffetz meant, DM me immediately. Full anonymity guaranteed. RT this. Tag Turning Point USA. Tag Candace Owens Baron Coleman The more pressure we apply, the harder it is for them to hide.

Project Constitution

242,611 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

While we're trying to get to the bottom of what happened to Charlie's wireless Rode mic & it's audio, AND the video from the camera right in front of Charlie, people have suggested we figure out who has these stolen hats & get them tested for explosive residue.

While we're trying to get to the bottom of what happened to Charlie's wireless Rode mic & it's audio, AND the video from the camera right in front of Charlie, people have suggested we figure out who has these stolen hats & get them tested for explosive residue.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

69,816 görüntüleme • 24 gün önce

Introducing DJI Mic 2 🎙 DJI Mic 2's omnidirectional recording and powerful noise-cancellation produces crystal-clear audio. Couple that with an 18-hour battery life & 32-bit Float Internal Recording and this mic has you covered. Discover more, here:

Introducing DJI Mic 2 🎙 DJI Mic 2's omnidirectional recording and powerful noise-cancellation produces crystal-clear audio. Couple that with an 18-hour battery life & 32-bit Float Internal Recording and this mic has you covered. Discover more, here:

DJI

116,142 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

PART 1: — Was it ACTUALLY THE MIC that killed CHARLIE ?! Or WAS IT SOMETHING ELSE ?! No, it WAS NOT a GUNSHOT! Could it have been something else ?!

PART 1: — Was it ACTUALLY THE MIC that killed CHARLIE ?! Or WAS IT SOMETHING ELSE ?! No, it WAS NOT a GUNSHOT! Could it have been something else ?!

LindsMac. —Real Truth Real Justice

74,346 görüntüleme • 8 gün önce

Watch @BaronColeman explain how Charlie's Rode Wireless mic worked and why TPUSA should still have the audio. Turning Point USA, why haven't you released it?

Watch @BaronColeman explain how Charlie's Rode Wireless mic worked and why TPUSA should still have the audio. Turning Point USA, why haven't you released it?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

124,405 görüntüleme • 17 gün önce

Candace Owens: “I’ve been saying that his Rode mic was rigged, but in order for my theory to be true, the Rode mic would have had to explode into a million pieces.” A theory is not evidence. Just because someone has a theory doesn’t make it true. We’re now at the point where Candace Owens is saying that Tyler Robinson didn’t kill Charlie Kirk and that a microphone somehow played a role instead. This is getting more bizarre by the day. Am I the only one who thinks this has gone completely off the rails?

Candace Owens: “I’ve been saying that his Rode mic was rigged, but in order for my theory to be true, the Rode mic would have had to explode into a million pieces.” A theory is not evidence. Just because someone has a theory doesn’t make it true. We’re now at the point where Candace Owens is saying that Tyler Robinson didn’t kill Charlie Kirk and that a microphone somehow played a role instead. This is getting more bizarre by the day. Am I the only one who thinks this has gone completely off the rails?

Tamera Nealy

54,885 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

NEW DEVELOPMENT CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION INVESTIGATION: Mikey McCoy spotted with TWO phones entering the UVU event with Charlie. McCoy previously came under scrutiny for raising a phone to his ear and walking away in less than a second after Charlie was k*lled. It was later learned that he called 3 people in a timeline that has also come under scrutiny. I have other questions: -what was he doing with that 2nd phone? -is that 2nd phone his, or Charlie's? -an unknown person was tweeting that morning from Charlie's Twitter account and at least 1 tweet is known to have been deleted. It was a tweet showing drone footage from the event. Did Mikey have anything to do with the tweeting and/or tweet deletion (from Charlie's phone)? -perhaps most importantly, why has Mikey not been forthcoming about this information given that his telephone habits have been under close examination and commentary? Why are we just finding out he (maybe) had 2 phones? h/t: @PBInvestigates & troofevades

NEW DEVELOPMENT CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION INVESTIGATION: Mikey McCoy spotted with TWO phones entering the UVU event with Charlie. McCoy previously came under scrutiny for raising a phone to his ear and walking away in less than a second after Charlie was k*lled. It was later learned that he called 3 people in a timeline that has also come under scrutiny. I have other questions: -what was he doing with that 2nd phone? -is that 2nd phone his, or Charlie's? -an unknown person was tweeting that morning from Charlie's Twitter account and at least 1 tweet is known to have been deleted. It was a tweet showing drone footage from the event. Did Mikey have anything to do with the tweeting and/or tweet deletion (from Charlie's phone)? -perhaps most importantly, why has Mikey not been forthcoming about this information given that his telephone habits have been under close examination and commentary? Why are we just finding out he (maybe) had 2 phones? h/t: @PBInvestigates & troofevades

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

43,520 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

Assassination of Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security. modified wireless mic was the weapon that kiIIed him The bodyguards killed Charlie Kirk; +They gave the signs right before the hit. +They detonated the bomb in the mic +They laugh at the dying victim. +they get rid of the evidence of the crime : The modified lapel mic that struck Charlie Kirk’s neck being discreetly handed off and removed from the crime scene. +They carry the lifeless body to the car like a sack of potatoes.

Assassination of Charlie Kirk’s Head of Security. modified wireless mic was the weapon that kiIIed him The bodyguards killed Charlie Kirk; +They gave the signs right before the hit. +They detonated the bomb in the mic +They laugh at the dying victim. +they get rid of the evidence of the crime : The modified lapel mic that struck Charlie Kirk’s neck being discreetly handed off and removed from the crime scene. +They carry the lifeless body to the car like a sack of potatoes.

Irlandarra

56,162 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce

I strolled down amnesia lane today and remembered this: Remember when Colin Carrie, MP for Oshawa, rose in the House rose to ask about outside interference in Canadian democracy when he asked, on behalf of a constituent, which MPs were on board with the WEF's agenda? You know, the question that was cut-off by the Speaker who claimed the audio was bad? The video was bad? The question that had so much bad audio it was recorded and posted on the internet so everyone could clearly hear how bad the audio....wasn't? The audio that was so bad, Charlie Angus rose in the House to utter a lie by claiming, "Mr. Speaker. That's known disinformation!" Which of course is patently false. Many videos on line shows Klaus openly admitting it. Remember how eager our media was to follow up on that story? Do you remember them easily looking up the proof and reporting on this very interesting story? The same way they were eager to get to the bottom of Epstein's death or Trudeau's net worth before and after the plandemic?

I strolled down amnesia lane today and remembered this: Remember when Colin Carrie, MP for Oshawa, rose in the House rose to ask about outside interference in Canadian democracy when he asked, on behalf of a constituent, which MPs were on board with the WEF's agenda? You know, the question that was cut-off by the Speaker who claimed the audio was bad? The video was bad? The question that had so much bad audio it was recorded and posted on the internet so everyone could clearly hear how bad the audio....wasn't? The audio that was so bad, Charlie Angus rose in the House to utter a lie by claiming, "Mr. Speaker. That's known disinformation!" Which of course is patently false. Many videos on line shows Klaus openly admitting it. Remember how eager our media was to follow up on that story? Do you remember them easily looking up the proof and reporting on this very interesting story? The same way they were eager to get to the bottom of Epstein's death or Trudeau's net worth before and after the plandemic?

Rational Posts™

32,926 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

ON THE CHARLIE KIRK "AUTOPSY" Now that a body armor ricochet has been definitively eliminated, the conventional "straight-on shot" narrative demands we now believe that Charlie Kirk's magic neck magically stopped another magic bullet. As you contemplate Andrew Kolvet's Superman explanation of Charlie's death, just remember: ▪️JFK's autopsy was botched & the results were tampered with. ▪️RFK's autopsy results were ignored. ▪️MLK's autopsy covered up the exact cause of his death. Maybe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie the way they say he did, a .30-06 shot that Charlie's neck miraculously stopped. And if it's proven to my satisfaction some day that that's the case, then I'll accept it. But today is not that day. In the meantime, learn how MLK Jr. actually died and how they lied to you about it:

ON THE CHARLIE KIRK "AUTOPSY" Now that a body armor ricochet has been definitively eliminated, the conventional "straight-on shot" narrative demands we now believe that Charlie Kirk's magic neck magically stopped another magic bullet. As you contemplate Andrew Kolvet's Superman explanation of Charlie's death, just remember: ▪️JFK's autopsy was botched & the results were tampered with. ▪️RFK's autopsy results were ignored. ▪️MLK's autopsy covered up the exact cause of his death. Maybe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie the way they say he did, a .30-06 shot that Charlie's neck miraculously stopped. And if it's proven to my satisfaction some day that that's the case, then I'll accept it. But today is not that day. In the meantime, learn how MLK Jr. actually died and how they lied to you about it:

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

219,539 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

According to Rob McCoy, his son Mikey called him immediately and said that Charlie had been shot in the neck. Rob also stated that Mikey was covered in blood. However, this account doesn’t add up, as it’s now known that Mikey McCoy walked away the moment Charlie was shot.

According to Rob McCoy, his son Mikey called him immediately and said that Charlie had been shot in the neck. Rob also stated that Mikey was covered in blood. However, this account doesn’t add up, as it’s now known that Mikey McCoy walked away the moment Charlie was shot.

Intrepidus𝕏

46,199 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

‼️BOMBSHELL: White Writing DISCOVERED On The Tiny Black ABS Shards FOUND In SUV That Transported Charlie To The Hospital — Further SUPPORTING Exploding Mic/Transceiver Theory 👀 Candace Owens just revealed new evidence that further backs up the exploding microphone theory in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. After enhancing images from the SUV that transported Charlie to the hospital, white writing was clearly visible on several of the black ABS shards found on the floorboard. A viewer pointed out that the RODE Wireless microphone system Charlie was wearing that day has distinct white “RODE” lettering on both the mic and the transceiver. After zooming in and comparing the shards to the actual RODE equipment, Candace confirmed the white markings match exactly what you would expect from a shattered RODE Wireless Pro. This adds another layer of physical evidence that lines up with the theory that Charlie’s microphone was rigged. The car was quickly sent for cleanup and auction instead of being preserved, making these shards even more significant. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

‼️BOMBSHELL: White Writing DISCOVERED On The Tiny Black ABS Shards FOUND In SUV That Transported Charlie To The Hospital — Further SUPPORTING Exploding Mic/Transceiver Theory 👀 Candace Owens just revealed new evidence that further backs up the exploding microphone theory in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. After enhancing images from the SUV that transported Charlie to the hospital, white writing was clearly visible on several of the black ABS shards found on the floorboard. A viewer pointed out that the RODE Wireless microphone system Charlie was wearing that day has distinct white “RODE” lettering on both the mic and the transceiver. After zooming in and comparing the shards to the actual RODE equipment, Candace confirmed the white markings match exactly what you would expect from a shattered RODE Wireless Pro. This adds another layer of physical evidence that lines up with the theory that Charlie’s microphone was rigged. The car was quickly sent for cleanup and auction instead of being preserved, making these shards even more significant. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

175,569 görüntüleme • 19 gün önce

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”

🚨THE SHOOTER WAS MUCH CLOSER - CHARLIE KIRK WAS SHOT FROM THE CROWD 🚨 CANDACE OWENS: “It is totally plausible that there were multiple people there that day, maybe even deciding in the last hour which one of them would take the shot.” “It is likely that a rifle was fired to muffle the sound of a smaller gun… which had to come from the front of Charlie.” “We are looking for a person that was a lot closer to Charlie, and likely in the audience.” “That goes a long way in explaining why they’re hiding the footage from behind Charlie’s head.” “Of all the cameras, why grab that one first?” “There’s a lot of hiding and definitively a lot of lying going on.”

HustleBitch

101,606 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

They put the Rode mic inside Charlie’s shirt instead of magnet being on the inside. Why in the world is his audio team what the tshirt to be iver the mic instead of the mic being on the outside for a clear audio?

They put the Rode mic inside Charlie’s shirt instead of magnet being on the inside. Why in the world is his audio team what the tshirt to be iver the mic instead of the mic being on the outside for a clear audio?

Trisha Hope - National Delegate-TX

45,674 görüntüleme • 25 gün önce

FRANK TUREK & THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARING FACETIME (and why it matters) First, the facts: You can clearly see Dan Flood's arm & bracelet on Frank Turek's phone screen. It's not possible that it is a reflection nor can it be direct filming from Frank's phone, which eliminates FaceTime. The only alternative is a separate video feed streaming through Frank's phone. I theorize it's from a little drone zipping around, but I'm not married to that idea. Regardless, this video evidence must be grappled with. It's definitive. I'm not saying Frank has committed a crime. Streaming a feed isn't a crime. I'm not saying that it even has anything to do with death of Charlie. What I *AM* saying is that Frank alleged he was on FaceTime and that's simply incompatible with the video. This discrepancy must be resolved. Details matter. At least 3 other reasons this matters: 1. Frank alleged his phone was stuck on FaceTime in his back pocket until he was back at the hotel after being at the hospital for hours! But if it wasn't on FaceTime, what was really going on that whole time? Why did he claim that? 2. Who was controlling that feed? Is there a recording? It could contain important evidence to help solve the crime. 3. If it was a drone, why was it there, and who was controlling it? Not Frank. Not the security team. Not Mikey. Not Terryl. Not Blake. Who? This video evidence could end up being a nothing-burger, or it could be the tip of a massive iceberg. That's why I keep hammering it. Like, retweet, comment:

FRANK TUREK & THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARING FACETIME (and why it matters) First, the facts: You can clearly see Dan Flood's arm & bracelet on Frank Turek's phone screen. It's not possible that it is a reflection nor can it be direct filming from Frank's phone, which eliminates FaceTime. The only alternative is a separate video feed streaming through Frank's phone. I theorize it's from a little drone zipping around, but I'm not married to that idea. Regardless, this video evidence must be grappled with. It's definitive. I'm not saying Frank has committed a crime. Streaming a feed isn't a crime. I'm not saying that it even has anything to do with death of Charlie. What I AM saying is that Frank alleged he was on FaceTime and that's simply incompatible with the video. This discrepancy must be resolved. Details matter. At least 3 other reasons this matters: 1. Frank alleged his phone was stuck on FaceTime in his back pocket until he was back at the hotel after being at the hospital for hours! But if it wasn't on FaceTime, what was really going on that whole time? Why did he claim that? 2. Who was controlling that feed? Is there a recording? It could contain important evidence to help solve the crime. 3. If it was a drone, why was it there, and who was controlling it? Not Frank. Not the security team. Not Mikey. Not Terryl. Not Blake. Who? This video evidence could end up being a nothing-burger, or it could be the tip of a massive iceberg. That's why I keep hammering it. Like, retweet, comment:

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

121,484 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

‼️NEW VIDEO: Charlie Kirk ADJUSTING His Lapel Mic Just Minutes BEFORE He Was Killed — While Addressing Trans Hecklers. 🧐 In this clip from UVU on September 10th, you can see Charlie Kirk addressing the trans hecklers yelling from the balcony. Right after, he reaches over to his shirt and adjusts his RODE wireless lapel microphone — You can clearly tell there's no transmitter taped underneath his shirt there, The Transmitter that was later found shattered inside the SUV was clipped to Charlie's belt on his left side. in line with the neck wound. This moment happened just before he started taking questions from the audience. The mic was clearly on him and everything was functioning normally at this point. What makes this clip significant is that it shows Charlie was NOT wearing the transmitter on his right side, taped to him as some people have alluded to. Another piece of footage that deserves a closer look. ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here: CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

‼️NEW VIDEO: Charlie Kirk ADJUSTING His Lapel Mic Just Minutes BEFORE He Was Killed — While Addressing Trans Hecklers. 🧐 In this clip from UVU on September 10th, you can see Charlie Kirk addressing the trans hecklers yelling from the balcony. Right after, he reaches over to his shirt and adjusts his RODE wireless lapel microphone — You can clearly tell there's no transmitter taped underneath his shirt there, The Transmitter that was later found shattered inside the SUV was clipped to Charlie's belt on his left side. in line with the neck wound. This moment happened just before he started taking questions from the audience. The mic was clearly on him and everything was functioning normally at this point. What makes this clip significant is that it shows Charlie was NOT wearing the transmitter on his right side, taped to him as some people have alluded to. Another piece of footage that deserves a closer look. ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here: CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

164,913 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

‼️BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Viewer Finds USB Logo on Shards — Proof Charlie’s RODE Mic/Receiver Exploded 😱 Candace Owens revealed new evidence that she says proves once and for all that the black shards found on the floor of the SUV that transported Charlie Kirk were pieces of his exploded RODE microphone. A viewer from France spotted what appears to be the USB logo on one of the shards and compared it directly to the actual RODE mic — and the match is exact. After rotating and zooming in on the image from her previous show, the viewer was able to clearly identify the USB icon on the shard, matching it perfectly to the RODE Wireless microphone system Charlie was wearing. Candace called it an “Inspector Gadget” level discovery and said this is what crowdsourcing a murder investigation looks like. She also noted that opticians have been emailing her to confirm the shards could not have come from sunglasses, further ruling out alternative explanations. This is a major development in the case. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

108,770 görüntüleme • 18 gün önce

UNRESOLVED: The day Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Benny Johnson alleged that Charlie's own team claimed to him that there was possible involvement of state actors in a professional hit job. Recall that that same afternoon, TPUSA's Andrew Kolvet himself shared with the FBI the group chats in which Charlie announced he was dropping the pro-israel cause, signaling he himself immediately thought it was relevant. Is this the angle Benny was referring to? Benny has since removed this September 10 stream from his youtube. Why? Who else would like to know more about this foreign-state involvement angle teased by Benny Johnson? Maybe it's nothing, but I think it's fair for us to want to know why close TPUSA insiders immediately suspected a foreign-involved professional assassination.

UNRESOLVED: The day Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Benny Johnson alleged that Charlie's own team claimed to him that there was possible involvement of state actors in a professional hit job. Recall that that same afternoon, TPUSA's Andrew Kolvet himself shared with the FBI the group chats in which Charlie announced he was dropping the pro-israel cause, signaling he himself immediately thought it was relevant. Is this the angle Benny was referring to? Benny has since removed this September 10 stream from his youtube. Why? Who else would like to know more about this foreign-state involvement angle teased by Benny Johnson? Maybe it's nothing, but I think it's fair for us to want to know why close TPUSA insiders immediately suspected a foreign-involved professional assassination.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

458,338 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Candace CALLS OUT TPUSA. Why won't they release the videos they have that they NEVER shared with the public? Candace Owens drops some very interesting information on TYLER ROBINSON and about the case, and calls out TPUSA because they won't release more information and the videos that they have that were never seen yet. WHY? She states that if people were accusing you to be involved, why wouldn't you release the videos to prove that you weren't involved? She does have a point. All the information should be released. But like I've stated before, they could be holding back because the case is still open and they don't want to compromise the investigation. She also did confirm that Charlie did start a DOGE team to investigate where the money was going and coming from. More from where it was all coming from? Was it an inside job. The one thing I will say is that the people there on that day that were all a part of his team and security did act very suspicious that day. Keep digging and eliminating theories that don't hold up as we go. Stick to the facts, but remember, there are layers, optics, and timing, to everything. cc: Candace Owens,

Candace CALLS OUT TPUSA. Why won't they release the videos they have that they NEVER shared with the public? Candace Owens drops some very interesting information on TYLER ROBINSON and about the case, and calls out TPUSA because they won't release more information and the videos that they have that were never seen yet. WHY? She states that if people were accusing you to be involved, why wouldn't you release the videos to prove that you weren't involved? She does have a point. All the information should be released. But like I've stated before, they could be holding back because the case is still open and they don't want to compromise the investigation. She also did confirm that Charlie did start a DOGE team to investigate where the money was going and coming from. More from where it was all coming from? Was it an inside job. The one thing I will say is that the people there on that day that were all a part of his team and security did act very suspicious that day. Keep digging and eliminating theories that don't hold up as we go. Stick to the facts, but remember, there are layers, optics, and timing, to everything. cc: Candace Owens,

The SCIF

143,527 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce