Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Bu video yüklenirken bir sorun oluştu. Bu geçici bir ağ sorunundan kaynaklanıyor olabilir veya video kullanılamıyor olabilir.

Ana Sayfaya Dön

MICROPHONE UPDATE: Charlie was wearing a Rode Wireless PRO, which comes standard with a lapel magnet, 2 storage cases + computer dock, 32-bit sound, and internal device recording & storage. ▪️The moment that mic was removed from its case, it was recording. ▪️The mic could only be turned off... remotely—neither Charlie nor the security team could have turned it off. ▪️All audio was captured & recorded on the mic itself. The 32-bit sound captures quiet whispers, loud shouts & everything in between. ▪️Mikey McCoy filmed a close-up video of Charlie getting mic'd up. Mikey, where's that video? Hey Philip Goldsberry and Terryl Farnsworth: where's Charlie's audio from that day? The public has a right to hear that audio. More importantly, it's holding extremely valuable evidence. (unless it was exploded, in which case those 32-bit recordings would be completely gone...). Is there audio from immediately after Charlie's death? Who else thinks TPUSA should have to release that audio?show more

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

145,531 subscribers

676,487 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

Haberler & Politika Eğitim Bilim & Teknoloji

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

MIKEY MCCOY RETURNS Mikey is in the surveillance footage Candace Owens released yesterday of Terryl Farnsworth messing around with the SD cards and computer (allegedly), leading to several questions: ▪️Why didn't Mikey rush to the hospital as it looked like he was doing when he scampered off towards the parking lot after Charlie was killed? What's he still doing at UVU? ▪️What about the witness who placed Mikey at the hospital a few minutes after Charlie arrived? If that wasn't Mikey, who was it? ▪️Mikey casually sauntered off the very moment Charlie was killed. Now Charlie's at the hospital, but Mikey is still nowhere near him. What's going on with Mikey? He's chief of staff: how do you not rush to the hospital?

MIKEY MCCOY RETURNS Mikey is in the surveillance footage Candace Owens released yesterday of Terryl Farnsworth messing around with the SD cards and computer (allegedly), leading to several questions: ▪️Why didn't Mikey rush to the hospital as it looked like he was doing when he scampered off towards the parking lot after Charlie was killed? What's he still doing at UVU? ▪️What about the witness who placed Mikey at the hospital a few minutes after Charlie arrived? If that wasn't Mikey, who was it? ▪️Mikey casually sauntered off the very moment Charlie was killed. Now Charlie's at the hospital, but Mikey is still nowhere near him. What's going on with Mikey? He's chief of staff: how do you not rush to the hospital?

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

59,445 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

🚨FOLLOW-UP: Jason Chaffetz Just Dropped a CRITICAL Detail About “Microphone Problems” at UVU — Right BEFORE Charlie Kirk Was Killed🤔 In one of the earliest interviews after the assassination, Jason Chaffetz (who was there that day) described the scene: “Charlie came out… they were having a little bit of a microphone problem. But everybody was chanting USA or Charlie Kirk… they were genuinely excited to see him.” What microphone problems? Was it the Rode wireless lapel mic Charlie was wearing? Or the handheld microphone he was gripping the moment of the “bang”? Because here’s what we already know from the evidence I posted yesterday: Dark marks/burn-like injuries on Charlie’s left hand (the one holding the mic) in both the UVU stills and the casket photo. Tiny black shards scattered under the tent and found inside the SUV that rushed him to the hospital — consistent with the material used in Rode wireless lapel mics and receivers. The audio tech visibly flinching before the big bang. Terryl Farnsworth immediately ripping the camera down, removing the SD cards, and tampering with evidence within minutes. Now add Chaffetz confirming microphone problems that day. This lines up disturbingly well with the theory that Charlie was taken out by an exploding microphone pack — similar to the PETN-rigged pager attacks Israel used on Hamas. Small charge. Remote detonation. Minimal visible residue. Maximum lethality. If they were already having mic issues that morning, it raises the obvious question: Was the mic tampered with? Was the problem the setup for the kill shot? TPUSA owes the public — and Charlie’s family — full transparency. What exactly were these “microphone problems”? Which mic was affected? Why has no one explained this? We’re not letting this go. The American people deserve answers. If you have any info on the AV setup that day, the mics used, or what Chaffetz meant, DM me immediately. Full anonymity guaranteed. RT this. Tag Turning Point USA. Tag Candace Owens Baron Coleman The more pressure we apply, the harder it is for them to hide.

🚨FOLLOW-UP: Jason Chaffetz Just Dropped a CRITICAL Detail About “Microphone Problems” at UVU — Right BEFORE Charlie Kirk Was Killed🤔 In one of the earliest interviews after the assassination, Jason Chaffetz (who was there that day) described the scene: “Charlie came out… they were having a little bit of a microphone problem. But everybody was chanting USA or Charlie Kirk… they were genuinely excited to see him.” What microphone problems? Was it the Rode wireless lapel mic Charlie was wearing? Or the handheld microphone he was gripping the moment of the “bang”? Because here’s what we already know from the evidence I posted yesterday: Dark marks/burn-like injuries on Charlie’s left hand (the one holding the mic) in both the UVU stills and the casket photo. Tiny black shards scattered under the tent and found inside the SUV that rushed him to the hospital — consistent with the material used in Rode wireless lapel mics and receivers. The audio tech visibly flinching before the big bang. Terryl Farnsworth immediately ripping the camera down, removing the SD cards, and tampering with evidence within minutes. Now add Chaffetz confirming microphone problems that day. This lines up disturbingly well with the theory that Charlie was taken out by an exploding microphone pack — similar to the PETN-rigged pager attacks Israel used on Hamas. Small charge. Remote detonation. Minimal visible residue. Maximum lethality. If they were already having mic issues that morning, it raises the obvious question: Was the mic tampered with? Was the problem the setup for the kill shot? TPUSA owes the public — and Charlie’s family — full transparency. What exactly were these “microphone problems”? Which mic was affected? Why has no one explained this? We’re not letting this go. The American people deserve answers. If you have any info on the AV setup that day, the mics used, or what Chaffetz meant, DM me immediately. Full anonymity guaranteed. RT this. Tag Turning Point USA. Tag Candace Owens Baron Coleman The more pressure we apply, the harder it is for them to hide.

Project Constitution

242,611 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Candace Owens: “I’ve been saying that his Rode mic was rigged, but in order for my theory to be true, the Rode mic would have had to explode into a million pieces.” A theory is not evidence. Just because someone has a theory doesn’t make it true. We’re now at the point where Candace Owens is saying that Tyler Robinson didn’t kill Charlie Kirk and that a microphone somehow played a role instead. This is getting more bizarre by the day. Am I the only one who thinks this has gone completely off the rails?

Candace Owens: “I’ve been saying that his Rode mic was rigged, but in order for my theory to be true, the Rode mic would have had to explode into a million pieces.” A theory is not evidence. Just because someone has a theory doesn’t make it true. We’re now at the point where Candace Owens is saying that Tyler Robinson didn’t kill Charlie Kirk and that a microphone somehow played a role instead. This is getting more bizarre by the day. Am I the only one who thinks this has gone completely off the rails?

Tamera Nealy

55,222 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

NEW DEVELOPMENT CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION INVESTIGATION: Mikey McCoy spotted with TWO phones entering the UVU event with Charlie. McCoy previously came under scrutiny for raising a phone to his ear and walking away in less than a second after Charlie was k*lled. It was later learned that he called 3 people in a timeline that has also come under scrutiny. I have other questions: -what was he doing with that 2nd phone? -is that 2nd phone his, or Charlie's? -an unknown person was tweeting that morning from Charlie's Twitter account and at least 1 tweet is known to have been deleted. It was a tweet showing drone footage from the event. Did Mikey have anything to do with the tweeting and/or tweet deletion (from Charlie's phone)? -perhaps most importantly, why has Mikey not been forthcoming about this information given that his telephone habits have been under close examination and commentary? Why are we just finding out he (maybe) had 2 phones? h/t: @PBInvestigates & troofevades

NEW DEVELOPMENT CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION INVESTIGATION: Mikey McCoy spotted with TWO phones entering the UVU event with Charlie. McCoy previously came under scrutiny for raising a phone to his ear and walking away in less than a second after Charlie was k*lled. It was later learned that he called 3 people in a timeline that has also come under scrutiny. I have other questions: -what was he doing with that 2nd phone? -is that 2nd phone his, or Charlie's? -an unknown person was tweeting that morning from Charlie's Twitter account and at least 1 tweet is known to have been deleted. It was a tweet showing drone footage from the event. Did Mikey have anything to do with the tweeting and/or tweet deletion (from Charlie's phone)? -perhaps most importantly, why has Mikey not been forthcoming about this information given that his telephone habits have been under close examination and commentary? Why are we just finding out he (maybe) had 2 phones? h/t: @PBInvestigates & troofevades

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

43,520 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Erika Krik is Wearing a Repaired Version of the Necklace That Was Never Collected as Evidence... Kirk was wearing a necklace when he was shot. It was never collected as evidence. Erika Kirk is now publicly wearing a repaired version of it. The microphone from the stage is preserved in a glass case in her possession. Charlie Kirk's chair — which would have contained blood deposition evidence showing trajectory and wound sequence — was apparently never formally collected. Joseph Scott Morgan's assessment: "Everything there has evidentary value. It should have all been collected." Baron Coleman JoScot

Erika Krik is Wearing a Repaired Version of the Necklace That Was Never Collected as Evidence... Kirk was wearing a necklace when he was shot. It was never collected as evidence. Erika Kirk is now publicly wearing a repaired version of it. The microphone from the stage is preserved in a glass case in her possession. Charlie Kirk's chair — which would have contained blood deposition evidence showing trajectory and wound sequence — was apparently never formally collected. Joseph Scott Morgan's assessment: "Everything there has evidentary value. It should have all been collected." Baron Coleman JoScot

Julian Dorey

198,566 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

I strolled down amnesia lane today and remembered this: Remember when Colin Carrie, MP for Oshawa, rose in the House rose to ask about outside interference in Canadian democracy when he asked, on behalf of a constituent, which MPs were on board with the WEF's agenda? You know, the question that was cut-off by the Speaker who claimed the audio was bad? The video was bad? The question that had so much bad audio it was recorded and posted on the internet so everyone could clearly hear how bad the audio....wasn't? The audio that was so bad, Charlie Angus rose in the House to utter a lie by claiming, "Mr. Speaker. That's known disinformation!" Which of course is patently false. Many videos on line shows Klaus openly admitting it. Remember how eager our media was to follow up on that story? Do you remember them easily looking up the proof and reporting on this very interesting story? The same way they were eager to get to the bottom of Epstein's death or Trudeau's net worth before and after the plandemic?

I strolled down amnesia lane today and remembered this: Remember when Colin Carrie, MP for Oshawa, rose in the House rose to ask about outside interference in Canadian democracy when he asked, on behalf of a constituent, which MPs were on board with the WEF's agenda? You know, the question that was cut-off by the Speaker who claimed the audio was bad? The video was bad? The question that had so much bad audio it was recorded and posted on the internet so everyone could clearly hear how bad the audio....wasn't? The audio that was so bad, Charlie Angus rose in the House to utter a lie by claiming, "Mr. Speaker. That's known disinformation!" Which of course is patently false. Many videos on line shows Klaus openly admitting it. Remember how eager our media was to follow up on that story? Do you remember them easily looking up the proof and reporting on this very interesting story? The same way they were eager to get to the bottom of Epstein's death or Trudeau's net worth before and after the plandemic?

Rational Posts™

32,926 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

ON THE CHARLIE KIRK "AUTOPSY" Now that a body armor ricochet has been definitively eliminated, the conventional "straight-on shot" narrative demands we now believe that Charlie Kirk's magic neck magically stopped another magic bullet. As you contemplate Andrew Kolvet's Superman explanation of Charlie's death, just remember: ▪️JFK's autopsy was botched & the results were tampered with. ▪️RFK's autopsy results were ignored. ▪️MLK's autopsy covered up the exact cause of his death. Maybe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie the way they say he did, a .30-06 shot that Charlie's neck miraculously stopped. And if it's proven to my satisfaction some day that that's the case, then I'll accept it. But today is not that day. In the meantime, learn how MLK Jr. actually died and how they lied to you about it:

ON THE CHARLIE KIRK "AUTOPSY" Now that a body armor ricochet has been definitively eliminated, the conventional "straight-on shot" narrative demands we now believe that Charlie Kirk's magic neck magically stopped another magic bullet. As you contemplate Andrew Kolvet's Superman explanation of Charlie's death, just remember: ▪️JFK's autopsy was botched & the results were tampered with. ▪️RFK's autopsy results were ignored. ▪️MLK's autopsy covered up the exact cause of his death. Maybe Tyler Robinson killed Charlie the way they say he did, a .30-06 shot that Charlie's neck miraculously stopped. And if it's proven to my satisfaction some day that that's the case, then I'll accept it. But today is not that day. In the meantime, learn how MLK Jr. actually died and how they lied to you about it:

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

222,727 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

‼️BOMBSHELL: White Writing DISCOVERED On The Tiny Black ABS Shards FOUND In SUV That Transported Charlie To The Hospital — Further SUPPORTING Exploding Mic/Transceiver Theory 👀 Candace Owens just revealed new evidence that further backs up the exploding microphone theory in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. After enhancing images from the SUV that transported Charlie to the hospital, white writing was clearly visible on several of the black ABS shards found on the floorboard. A viewer pointed out that the RODE Wireless microphone system Charlie was wearing that day has distinct white “RODE” lettering on both the mic and the transceiver. After zooming in and comparing the shards to the actual RODE equipment, Candace confirmed the white markings match exactly what you would expect from a shattered RODE Wireless Pro. This adds another layer of physical evidence that lines up with the theory that Charlie’s microphone was rigged. The car was quickly sent for cleanup and auction instead of being preserved, making these shards even more significant. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

‼️BOMBSHELL: White Writing DISCOVERED On The Tiny Black ABS Shards FOUND In SUV That Transported Charlie To The Hospital — Further SUPPORTING Exploding Mic/Transceiver Theory 👀 Candace Owens just revealed new evidence that further backs up the exploding microphone theory in Charlie Kirk’s assassination. After enhancing images from the SUV that transported Charlie to the hospital, white writing was clearly visible on several of the black ABS shards found on the floorboard. A viewer pointed out that the RODE Wireless microphone system Charlie was wearing that day has distinct white “RODE” lettering on both the mic and the transceiver. After zooming in and comparing the shards to the actual RODE equipment, Candace confirmed the white markings match exactly what you would expect from a shattered RODE Wireless Pro. This adds another layer of physical evidence that lines up with the theory that Charlie’s microphone was rigged. The car was quickly sent for cleanup and auction instead of being preserved, making these shards even more significant. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

176,586 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

FRANK TUREK & THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARING FACETIME (and why it matters) First, the facts: You can clearly see Dan Flood's arm & bracelet on Frank Turek's phone screen. It's not possible that it is a reflection nor can it be direct filming from Frank's phone, which eliminates FaceTime. The only alternative is a separate video feed streaming through Frank's phone. I theorize it's from a little drone zipping around, but I'm not married to that idea. Regardless, this video evidence must be grappled with. It's definitive. I'm not saying Frank has committed a crime. Streaming a feed isn't a crime. I'm not saying that it even has anything to do with death of Charlie. What I *AM* saying is that Frank alleged he was on FaceTime and that's simply incompatible with the video. This discrepancy must be resolved. Details matter. At least 3 other reasons this matters: 1. Frank alleged his phone was stuck on FaceTime in his back pocket until he was back at the hotel after being at the hospital for hours! But if it wasn't on FaceTime, what was really going on that whole time? Why did he claim that? 2. Who was controlling that feed? Is there a recording? It could contain important evidence to help solve the crime. 3. If it was a drone, why was it there, and who was controlling it? Not Frank. Not the security team. Not Mikey. Not Terryl. Not Blake. Who? This video evidence could end up being a nothing-burger, or it could be the tip of a massive iceberg. That's why I keep hammering it. Like, retweet, comment:

FRANK TUREK & THE MYSTERIOUS DISAPPEARING FACETIME (and why it matters) First, the facts: You can clearly see Dan Flood's arm & bracelet on Frank Turek's phone screen. It's not possible that it is a reflection nor can it be direct filming from Frank's phone, which eliminates FaceTime. The only alternative is a separate video feed streaming through Frank's phone. I theorize it's from a little drone zipping around, but I'm not married to that idea. Regardless, this video evidence must be grappled with. It's definitive. I'm not saying Frank has committed a crime. Streaming a feed isn't a crime. I'm not saying that it even has anything to do with death of Charlie. What I AM saying is that Frank alleged he was on FaceTime and that's simply incompatible with the video. This discrepancy must be resolved. Details matter. At least 3 other reasons this matters: 1. Frank alleged his phone was stuck on FaceTime in his back pocket until he was back at the hotel after being at the hospital for hours! But if it wasn't on FaceTime, what was really going on that whole time? Why did he claim that? 2. Who was controlling that feed? Is there a recording? It could contain important evidence to help solve the crime. 3. If it was a drone, why was it there, and who was controlling it? Not Frank. Not the security team. Not Mikey. Not Terryl. Not Blake. Who? This video evidence could end up being a nothing-burger, or it could be the tip of a massive iceberg. That's why I keep hammering it. Like, retweet, comment:

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

126,460 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

‼️NEW VIDEO: Charlie Kirk ADJUSTING His Lapel Mic Just Minutes BEFORE He Was Killed — While Addressing Trans Hecklers. 🧐 In this clip from UVU on September 10th, you can see Charlie Kirk addressing the trans hecklers yelling from the balcony. Right after, he reaches over to his shirt and adjusts his RODE wireless lapel microphone — You can clearly tell there's no transmitter taped underneath his shirt there, The Transmitter that was later found shattered inside the SUV was clipped to Charlie's belt on his left side. in line with the neck wound. This moment happened just before he started taking questions from the audience. The mic was clearly on him and everything was functioning normally at this point. What makes this clip significant is that it shows Charlie was NOT wearing the transmitter on his right side, taped to him as some people have alluded to. Another piece of footage that deserves a closer look. ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here: CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

‼️NEW VIDEO: Charlie Kirk ADJUSTING His Lapel Mic Just Minutes BEFORE He Was Killed — While Addressing Trans Hecklers. 🧐 In this clip from UVU on September 10th, you can see Charlie Kirk addressing the trans hecklers yelling from the balcony. Right after, he reaches over to his shirt and adjusts his RODE wireless lapel microphone — You can clearly tell there's no transmitter taped underneath his shirt there, The Transmitter that was later found shattered inside the SUV was clipped to Charlie's belt on his left side. in line with the neck wound. This moment happened just before he started taking questions from the audience. The mic was clearly on him and everything was functioning normally at this point. What makes this clip significant is that it shows Charlie was NOT wearing the transmitter on his right side, taped to him as some people have alluded to. Another piece of footage that deserves a closer look. ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here: CC: Candace Owens Baron Coleman

Project Constitution

194,588 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

‼️BOMBSHELL: Candace Owens Viewer Finds USB Logo on Shards — Proof Charlie’s RODE Mic/Receiver Exploded 😱 Candace Owens revealed new evidence that she says proves once and for all that the black shards found on the floor of the SUV that transported Charlie Kirk were pieces of his exploded RODE microphone. A viewer from France spotted what appears to be the USB logo on one of the shards and compared it directly to the actual RODE mic — and the match is exact. After rotating and zooming in on the image from her previous show, the viewer was able to clearly identify the USB icon on the shard, matching it perfectly to the RODE Wireless microphone system Charlie was wearing. Candace called it an “Inspector Gadget” level discovery and said this is what crowdsourcing a murder investigation looks like. She also noted that opticians have been emailing her to confirm the shards could not have come from sunglasses, further ruling out alternative explanations. This is a major development in the case. FOLLOW Candace Owens , RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇 ⚠️If you value our work and want to help us financially, your support is what helps us stay independent and keep the lights on. DONATE Here:

Project Constitution

109,102 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

UNRESOLVED: The day Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Benny Johnson alleged that Charlie's own team claimed to him that there was possible involvement of state actors in a professional hit job. Recall that that same afternoon, TPUSA's Andrew Kolvet himself shared with the FBI the group chats in which Charlie announced he was dropping the pro-israel cause, signaling he himself immediately thought it was relevant. Is this the angle Benny was referring to? Benny has since removed this September 10 stream from his youtube. Why? Who else would like to know more about this foreign-state involvement angle teased by Benny Johnson? Maybe it's nothing, but I think it's fair for us to want to know why close TPUSA insiders immediately suspected a foreign-involved professional assassination.

UNRESOLVED: The day Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Benny Johnson alleged that Charlie's own team claimed to him that there was possible involvement of state actors in a professional hit job. Recall that that same afternoon, TPUSA's Andrew Kolvet himself shared with the FBI the group chats in which Charlie announced he was dropping the pro-israel cause, signaling he himself immediately thought it was relevant. Is this the angle Benny was referring to? Benny has since removed this September 10 stream from his youtube. Why? Who else would like to know more about this foreign-state involvement angle teased by Benny Johnson? Maybe it's nothing, but I think it's fair for us to want to know why close TPUSA insiders immediately suspected a foreign-involved professional assassination.

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

458,338 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ABANDONED BY CHIEF OF STAFF! After spending the entire morning at Charlie Kirk's side filming everything, Charlie's friend & TPUSA Chief of Staff Mikey McCoy appears to ABANDON Charlie at the very moment of Charlie's death. You simply must watch Mikey McCoy turn & walk away from Charlie in the very instant Charlie is mowed down. Mikey doesn't jump in surprise. He doesn't duck for cover. He doesn't rush to Charlie's aid. He doesn't run away in panic. He doesn't even try to capture any footage as he's been doing all morning! Nope. None of that. Instead, what he actually does is calmly strolls off. That's it. He just turns and walks away. No fuss. No muss. And no security accompanies him, so he's apparently not being evacuated for his own protection or anything like that. He just saunters off by himself. As everyone else rushes to Charlie's aid and carries him to the SUV to jet him to the hospital, Mikey McCoy can be seen walking away in the distance, completely ignorant of whatever it is that's happening to Charlie behind him--and not visibly caring at all. Was Charlie dead? Was he bleeding out? Did Charlie need help? Should he ride with Charlie to the hospital? Where are they taking Charlie? What's going on?!--Apparently these were all questions of no concern to Mikey McCoy, Charlie's FRIEND and CHIEF OF STAFF. Watch this to the end and tell me what you think. Is Mikey just panicking in his own (very) odd way, or is there something more suspicious going on? Is this an "Et tu, Brute" moment caught on film? Or is it a nothingburger? What would Charlie say if he could watch this footage of his friend abandoning him in his moment of crisis & greatest need? Is this how you'd have reacted if it had been your buddy? WHAT'S GOING ON? H/T: SCOOTIE🇺🇲 & ❁ダテʚïɞ

BREAKING: CHARLIE KIRK ABANDONED BY CHIEF OF STAFF! After spending the entire morning at Charlie Kirk's side filming everything, Charlie's friend & TPUSA Chief of Staff Mikey McCoy appears to ABANDON Charlie at the very moment of Charlie's death. You simply must watch Mikey McCoy turn & walk away from Charlie in the very instant Charlie is mowed down. Mikey doesn't jump in surprise. He doesn't duck for cover. He doesn't rush to Charlie's aid. He doesn't run away in panic. He doesn't even try to capture any footage as he's been doing all morning! Nope. None of that. Instead, what he actually does is calmly strolls off. That's it. He just turns and walks away. No fuss. No muss. And no security accompanies him, so he's apparently not being evacuated for his own protection or anything like that. He just saunters off by himself. As everyone else rushes to Charlie's aid and carries him to the SUV to jet him to the hospital, Mikey McCoy can be seen walking away in the distance, completely ignorant of whatever it is that's happening to Charlie behind him--and not visibly caring at all. Was Charlie dead? Was he bleeding out? Did Charlie need help? Should he ride with Charlie to the hospital? Where are they taking Charlie? What's going on?!--Apparently these were all questions of no concern to Mikey McCoy, Charlie's FRIEND and CHIEF OF STAFF. Watch this to the end and tell me what you think. Is Mikey just panicking in his own (very) odd way, or is there something more suspicious going on? Is this an "Et tu, Brute" moment caught on film? Or is it a nothingburger? What would Charlie say if he could watch this footage of his friend abandoning him in his moment of crisis & greatest need? Is this how you'd have reacted if it had been your buddy? WHAT'S GOING ON? H/T: SCOOTIE🇺🇲 & ❁ダテʚïɞ

Sam Parker 🇺🇸🧯

2,223,180 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

Candace CALLS OUT TPUSA. Why won't they release the videos they have that they NEVER shared with the public? Candace Owens drops some very interesting information on TYLER ROBINSON and about the case, and calls out TPUSA because they won't release more information and the videos that they have that were never seen yet. WHY? She states that if people were accusing you to be involved, why wouldn't you release the videos to prove that you weren't involved? She does have a point. All the information should be released. But like I've stated before, they could be holding back because the case is still open and they don't want to compromise the investigation. She also did confirm that Charlie did start a DOGE team to investigate where the money was going and coming from. More from where it was all coming from? Was it an inside job. The one thing I will say is that the people there on that day that were all a part of his team and security did act very suspicious that day. Keep digging and eliminating theories that don't hold up as we go. Stick to the facts, but remember, there are layers, optics, and timing, to everything. cc: Candace Owens,

Candace CALLS OUT TPUSA. Why won't they release the videos they have that they NEVER shared with the public? Candace Owens drops some very interesting information on TYLER ROBINSON and about the case, and calls out TPUSA because they won't release more information and the videos that they have that were never seen yet. WHY? She states that if people were accusing you to be involved, why wouldn't you release the videos to prove that you weren't involved? She does have a point. All the information should be released. But like I've stated before, they could be holding back because the case is still open and they don't want to compromise the investigation. She also did confirm that Charlie did start a DOGE team to investigate where the money was going and coming from. More from where it was all coming from? Was it an inside job. The one thing I will say is that the people there on that day that were all a part of his team and security did act very suspicious that day. Keep digging and eliminating theories that don't hold up as we go. Stick to the facts, but remember, there are layers, optics, and timing, to everything. cc: Candace Owens,

The SCIF

143,527 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Candace deleted this video off every platform. It was the first podcast she did with PragerU. Now why would she want this particular video taken down right after Charlie died? It was up in Sept. I watched the entire video. Now it's gone. This is why Charlie didn't want to deal with the wrath of Candace. Just remember while watching the video the look on Charlie's face while she says it. Can you imagine her calling him up in the middle of the night crying, yelling and screaming at him like a raging lunatic? Also, remember she wouldn't go to the events and hang out with the students. A lot of the times she wouldn't show at all. She would demand to be taken back to the hotel immediately after any of the events. The hurt and the angst I believe came from Erika showing up on the scene. Notice how she tries to make it Charlie and Candace and everyone ties their names together. She was trying to make that connection as something between them. Then later in the video she jokes that everyone thought that her and Charlie were dating and people were disappointed to learn that they weren't a couple. I may have that clip, but I will have to look for it. This is right after she was asked to leave from TPUSA the first time over the "Hitler" comments. I don't think it was the Hitler comments. Can you imagine being Charlie and Erika and having to travel with Candace? I don't think it went well.

Candace deleted this video off every platform. It was the first podcast she did with PragerU. Now why would she want this particular video taken down right after Charlie died? It was up in Sept. I watched the entire video. Now it's gone. This is why Charlie didn't want to deal with the wrath of Candace. Just remember while watching the video the look on Charlie's face while she says it. Can you imagine her calling him up in the middle of the night crying, yelling and screaming at him like a raging lunatic? Also, remember she wouldn't go to the events and hang out with the students. A lot of the times she wouldn't show at all. She would demand to be taken back to the hotel immediately after any of the events. The hurt and the angst I believe came from Erika showing up on the scene. Notice how she tries to make it Charlie and Candace and everyone ties their names together. She was trying to make that connection as something between them. Then later in the video she jokes that everyone thought that her and Charlie were dating and people were disappointed to learn that they weren't a couple. I may have that clip, but I will have to look for it. This is right after she was asked to leave from TPUSA the first time over the "Hitler" comments. I don't think it was the Hitler comments. Can you imagine being Charlie and Erika and having to travel with Candace? I don't think it went well.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

139,296 görüntüleme • 14 gün önce

🚨PART ONE: Aspen Donors BREAK Their Silence on the Allegedly FAKED Audio Of Charlie Wanting Erika Kirk To Be CEO —Charlie Kirk’s Alleged "Death Wish" CONTRADICTS His Entire Life’s Work🏔️🚫 Candace Owens just opened the floodgates on the "Shady Bunch" at TPUSA, and she’s using a new word of the day: Mythomania. It’s the pathological tendency to lie and overthink until you accidentally incriminate yourself. The Aspen "Transcript": When Candace sat down with Erika Kirk on December 15th, she wasn't even questioning the CEO transition. She assumed it was a symbolic move for public morale. But TPUSA overthought it. Without being asked, they shoved a "transcript" in her face from an August donor meeting in Aspen, claiming Charlie hand-picked Erika to lead in the event of his death. The Red Flags: The 180-Degree Turn: Charlie Kirk built his entire platform on the idea that women should not be corporate CEOs, especially mothers of young children. Are we to believe he suddenly reversed his lifelong worldview just three weeks before he died? The "Single Mother" Narrative: Erika has been curating a story about her mother being a "blueprint" for a single-mother CEO—except Candace revealed Erika grew up with a stepfather and a present father. It’s a curated backstory for a pre-planned role. The AmFest "Walkout" Audio: This is where it gets truly bizarre. At AmFest, TPUSA played audio of Charlie allegedly appointing Erika. But there was no video. Think about the logic: If you have 4K video of Charlie Kirk’s final "vision-casting" moment where he blesses his wife as his successor, that is the most powerful PR tool in history. Why would you strip the video and only play the audio? The "Franken-Audio" Analysis: If you listen closely to the clip (which Candace did), the ending is jarring. Charlie talks about the board "figuring it out," and then a clunky, out-of-place edit jumps in: "I appoint my wife..." It’s edited. It’s unnatural. It’s Franken-audio. Candace spoke to people who were at that Aspen meeting. Their response? Charlie never said that. 🚫 Was the "CEO" title a reward for silence? Was the audio fabricated to justify a takeover that Charlie never wanted? The "unnecessary complexity" is starting to look like a cover-up. 🏗️⚔️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below. 👇

🚨PART ONE: Aspen Donors BREAK Their Silence on the Allegedly FAKED Audio Of Charlie Wanting Erika Kirk To Be CEO —Charlie Kirk’s Alleged "Death Wish" CONTRADICTS His Entire Life’s Work🏔️🚫 Candace Owens just opened the floodgates on the "Shady Bunch" at TPUSA, and she’s using a new word of the day: Mythomania. It’s the pathological tendency to lie and overthink until you accidentally incriminate yourself. The Aspen "Transcript": When Candace sat down with Erika Kirk on December 15th, she wasn't even questioning the CEO transition. She assumed it was a symbolic move for public morale. But TPUSA overthought it. Without being asked, they shoved a "transcript" in her face from an August donor meeting in Aspen, claiming Charlie hand-picked Erika to lead in the event of his death. The Red Flags: The 180-Degree Turn: Charlie Kirk built his entire platform on the idea that women should not be corporate CEOs, especially mothers of young children. Are we to believe he suddenly reversed his lifelong worldview just three weeks before he died? The "Single Mother" Narrative: Erika has been curating a story about her mother being a "blueprint" for a single-mother CEO—except Candace revealed Erika grew up with a stepfather and a present father. It’s a curated backstory for a pre-planned role. The AmFest "Walkout" Audio: This is where it gets truly bizarre. At AmFest, TPUSA played audio of Charlie allegedly appointing Erika. But there was no video. Think about the logic: If you have 4K video of Charlie Kirk’s final "vision-casting" moment where he blesses his wife as his successor, that is the most powerful PR tool in history. Why would you strip the video and only play the audio? The "Franken-Audio" Analysis: If you listen closely to the clip (which Candace did), the ending is jarring. Charlie talks about the board "figuring it out," and then a clunky, out-of-place edit jumps in: "I appoint my wife..." It’s edited. It’s unnatural. It’s Franken-audio. Candace spoke to people who were at that Aspen meeting. Their response? Charlie never said that. 🚫 Was the "CEO" title a reward for silence? Was the audio fabricated to justify a takeover that Charlie never wanted? The "unnecessary complexity" is starting to look like a cover-up. 🏗️⚔️ FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below. 👇

Project Constitution

46,286 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

GUN SHOT FLASH caught behind blue tent behind Charlie on VIDEO and the SOUND of a 2ND GUN SHOT captured on audio. Does this PROVE the 2ND SHOOTER theory? You have to see this. This could be a huge breakthrough. You can actual see the gun shot flash coming out of a barrel of some sort from BEHIND Charlie's tent. Right after the FIRST shot is seen and caught on video, when you slow down the footage, you can actually hear TWO SEPERATE GUN SHOTS. There is ANOTHER gun shot right after the FIRST one, which the SOUND of it is caught on the camera's audio. You can't deny that this is the FLASH of a gun shot seen clearly on video coming from behind that blue tent. This needs to be absolutely confirmed because this could be a huge break through confirming a potential location of one shooter behind the blue tent and confirming the existence of a 2nd SHOOTER somewhere else. I want to hear feedback, what do you think? cc: Project Constitution

GUN SHOT FLASH caught behind blue tent behind Charlie on VIDEO and the SOUND of a 2ND GUN SHOT captured on audio. Does this PROVE the 2ND SHOOTER theory? You have to see this. This could be a huge breakthrough. You can actual see the gun shot flash coming out of a barrel of some sort from BEHIND Charlie's tent. Right after the FIRST shot is seen and caught on video, when you slow down the footage, you can actually hear TWO SEPERATE GUN SHOTS. There is ANOTHER gun shot right after the FIRST one, which the SOUND of it is caught on the camera's audio. You can't deny that this is the FLASH of a gun shot seen clearly on video coming from behind that blue tent. This needs to be absolutely confirmed because this could be a huge break through confirming a potential location of one shooter behind the blue tent and confirming the existence of a 2nd SHOOTER somewhere else. I want to hear feedback, what do you think? cc: Project Constitution

The SCIF

32,169 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

3D reconstruction & analysis of Charlie Kirk assassination that speaks volumes. 4 different shooter location perspectives with line of sight and shot trajectory line with very interesting conclusions. Also includes sound analysis of official narrative which is the most important and telling results, which breaks the official narrative once again. - The sound analysis and the video proved that we heard the shot and saw Charlie getting shot at the same time, when Charlie should of been shot first then we would of heard the sound of the shot if it was at 150 yards with the rifle they claim shot Charlie, considering the speed of the bullet and the speed of sound. - This conclusion means that the shot had to come from a closer proximity, from 50 yards or less, not 150 yards, considering that we do know exactly where the video and audio was taken from, and how far it was away from Charlie. Watch the full video for full context and to understand all 4 shooter locations and sound analysis conclusion. It's starting to narrow down some possibilities, which is great. Little by little we move closer to the truth. Thoughts, comments, and speculation down below, the more eyes and theories the better. cc: Trigger Smart

3D reconstruction & analysis of Charlie Kirk assassination that speaks volumes. 4 different shooter location perspectives with line of sight and shot trajectory line with very interesting conclusions. Also includes sound analysis of official narrative which is the most important and telling results, which breaks the official narrative once again. - The sound analysis and the video proved that we heard the shot and saw Charlie getting shot at the same time, when Charlie should of been shot first then we would of heard the sound of the shot if it was at 150 yards with the rifle they claim shot Charlie, considering the speed of the bullet and the speed of sound. - This conclusion means that the shot had to come from a closer proximity, from 50 yards or less, not 150 yards, considering that we do know exactly where the video and audio was taken from, and how far it was away from Charlie. Watch the full video for full context and to understand all 4 shooter locations and sound analysis conclusion. It's starting to narrow down some possibilities, which is great. Little by little we move closer to the truth. Thoughts, comments, and speculation down below, the more eyes and theories the better. cc: Trigger Smart

The SCIF

63,486 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

📍Well would you look at that. This was Senator Graham not so long ago. ▪️“The YPG element is integrated with the PKK, just read their manifesto.” ▪️“There is lots of evidence about the YPG-PKK link.” ▪️“The US created the YPG problem and it needs to fix it, we owe it to Turkey, we created a problem for Turkey.” ▪️“It was a dumb idea to rely on the YPG, it proved to be a dumb idea, I saw this coming a long time ago.” ▪️“Obama did a huge mistake in relying on the YPG Kurds.” ▪️“We’ve got to make sure that Turkey is protected from this threat in Syria.” ▪️“I agree with Turkey that this is the dumbest idea in the world.” ▪️“We’re arming people inside Syria aligned with a terrorist group.” I wonder what has changed. If you’re so worried about that “huge mistake” that was made and the “dumb idea” Obama came up with, there you go, that mistake has now been fixed by the Syrian government which is busy cleaning up your mess after you, you’re welcome. If you’re worried about the threat to Turkey, there you go, the threat is about to largely disappear, at least in Syria. And it sure seems odd that you’re now suddenly worried about the well-being of an organization which you have repeatedly acknowledged to be an offshoot of a terrorist group recognized by the US as such. You once seemed worried about having created a problem for Turkey and now you’re really complaining about Turkey being involved in the process in Syria, which by the way is a direct matter of its national security? The very national security, that you acknowledged to having endangered by arming the YPG? Nothing you say makes any sense. Especially since it makes you look like you support a terror group. After all it was you who said that the YPG is linked to the PKK with lots of evidence confirming it.

📍Well would you look at that. This was Senator Graham not so long ago. ▪️“The YPG element is integrated with the PKK, just read their manifesto.” ▪️“There is lots of evidence about the YPG-PKK link.” ▪️“The US created the YPG problem and it needs to fix it, we owe it to Turkey, we created a problem for Turkey.” ▪️“It was a dumb idea to rely on the YPG, it proved to be a dumb idea, I saw this coming a long time ago.” ▪️“Obama did a huge mistake in relying on the YPG Kurds.” ▪️“We’ve got to make sure that Turkey is protected from this threat in Syria.” ▪️“I agree with Turkey that this is the dumbest idea in the world.” ▪️“We’re arming people inside Syria aligned with a terrorist group.” I wonder what has changed. If you’re so worried about that “huge mistake” that was made and the “dumb idea” Obama came up with, there you go, that mistake has now been fixed by the Syrian government which is busy cleaning up your mess after you, you’re welcome. If you’re worried about the threat to Turkey, there you go, the threat is about to largely disappear, at least in Syria. And it sure seems odd that you’re now suddenly worried about the well-being of an organization which you have repeatedly acknowledged to be an offshoot of a terrorist group recognized by the US as such. You once seemed worried about having created a problem for Turkey and now you’re really complaining about Turkey being involved in the process in Syria, which by the way is a direct matter of its national security? The very national security, that you acknowledged to having endangered by arming the YPG? Nothing you say makes any sense. Especially since it makes you look like you support a terror group. After all it was you who said that the YPG is linked to the PKK with lots of evidence confirming it.

Bedrettin

60,094 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce