Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

Возникла проблема при загрузке этого видео. Это может быть связано с временными проблемами сети или видео может быть недоступно.

На главную

Modi didn't just survive Trump's 50% tariffs, he used them as leverage to reshape India's entire trade architecture. By sequencing landmark free trade agreements with the UK and EU before engaging Washington, Modi created a multilateral pressure system that forced Trump to slash tariffs from 50% to 18% in... show more

JIX5A

64,854 subscribers

55,482 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политика Финансы

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

#WATCH | Delhi | On the India-US trade agreement, BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj says, "...PM Modi has signed one trade deal after another to make India's economic future very bright, and yesterday he signed a new deal with the US where tariffs that were as high as 50% in India will now be reduced to just 18%. This will give a huge boost to both 'Make in India' products and India's supply chain... Many congratulations and thanks to the people of India, the people of America, Donald Trump, and PM Modi for this new trade agreement."

#WATCH | Delhi | On the India-US trade agreement, BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj says, "...PM Modi has signed one trade deal after another to make India's economic future very bright, and yesterday he signed a new deal with the US where tariffs that were as high as 50% in India will now be reduced to just 18%. This will give a huge boost to both 'Make in India' products and India's supply chain... Many congratulations and thanks to the people of India, the people of America, Donald Trump, and PM Modi for this new trade agreement."

ANI

27,945 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Dhruva Jaishankar (Dhruva Jaishankar · ध्रुव जयशंकर), Executive Director of ORF America speaks to NDTV's Shiv Aroor on the recently announced US–India trade deal. President Donald Trump claimed the agreement will reduce tariffs on Indian goods from 50% to 18% and linked it to India halting purchases of Russian oil. The deal is seen as a step forward in bilateral trade relations between the two countries, which share a combined GDP of $33 trillion. Experts weigh in on what the deal means for trade and economic ties.

Dhruva Jaishankar (Dhruva Jaishankar · ध्रुव जयशंकर), Executive Director of ORF America speaks to NDTV's Shiv Aroor on the recently announced US–India trade deal. President Donald Trump claimed the agreement will reduce tariffs on Indian goods from 50% to 18% and linked it to India halting purchases of Russian oil. The deal is seen as a step forward in bilateral trade relations between the two countries, which share a combined GDP of $33 trillion. Experts weigh in on what the deal means for trade and economic ties.

NDTV

28,364 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 JUST IN: Trump's massive trade deal with the European Union will SLASH the USA trade deficit with the EU, yet another promise Trump vowed to fulfill. The experts lost. "We have had an enormous trade deficit with the EU for a very long time. And a lot of that has been because the EU has historically had higher tariffs and non-tariff barriers on the United States. This deal changes that. It is a structural change in the US-EU trade relationship in favor of rebalancing." - Trade Rep. Greer

🚨 JUST IN: Trump's massive trade deal with the European Union will SLASH the USA trade deficit with the EU, yet another promise Trump vowed to fulfill. The experts lost. "We have had an enormous trade deficit with the EU for a very long time. And a lot of that has been because the EU has historically had higher tariffs and non-tariff barriers on the United States. This deal changes that. It is a structural change in the US-EU trade relationship in favor of rebalancing." - Trade Rep. Greer

Eric Daugherty

35,620 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

🇺🇸Trump’s Tariff Plan Explained: Destroy or Help The US Economy? Trump describes tariffs as his "favorite word." To understand the concept, think of it like this: Imagine you’re an accountant seeking business referrals. You meet someone who sells auto insurance, and you agree to exchange referrals equally. A month later, you’ve given them five referrals, but they haven’t given you any. You now have a "referral deficit" while they have a "referral surplus." This is similar to a trade deficit versus a trade surplus. Now, on a larger scale, the U.S. has a global trade deficit of $1.1 trillion, meaning it has provided $1.1 trillion more business to other countries than it has received. China, on the other hand, has a trade surplus of $823 billion, receiving more business than it gives. Trump’s use of tariffs is an attempt to address these imbalances and renegotiate trade deals. Tariffs are tools that governments can use to create leverage in trade negotiations. Historically, tariffs have been used as a form of taxation on imports, dating back to the Roman Empire and becoming prominent in the mercantilist policies of the 16th and 18th centuries. Economist Adam Smith, known for his book Wealth of Nations, argued that tariffs can disrupt free trade, but he noted 2 exceptions: protecting industries critical to national security and counteracting tariffs imposed by other nations. These points remain relevant in modern trade discussions. When examining trade surpluses and deficits globally, China leads with a significant surplus, while countries like the U.S., UK, and India experience deficits. Tariffs can serve as leverage to balance these relationships and ensure fair trade practices. Understanding tariffs and trade negotiations is key to grasping how governments seek to protect their economies and industries in a globalized world. Source: Patrick Bet-David , @ValuetainmentTV

🇺🇸Trump’s Tariff Plan Explained: Destroy or Help The US Economy? Trump describes tariffs as his "favorite word." To understand the concept, think of it like this: Imagine you’re an accountant seeking business referrals. You meet someone who sells auto insurance, and you agree to exchange referrals equally. A month later, you’ve given them five referrals, but they haven’t given you any. You now have a "referral deficit" while they have a "referral surplus." This is similar to a trade deficit versus a trade surplus. Now, on a larger scale, the U.S. has a global trade deficit of $1.1 trillion, meaning it has provided $1.1 trillion more business to other countries than it has received. China, on the other hand, has a trade surplus of $823 billion, receiving more business than it gives. Trump’s use of tariffs is an attempt to address these imbalances and renegotiate trade deals. Tariffs are tools that governments can use to create leverage in trade negotiations. Historically, tariffs have been used as a form of taxation on imports, dating back to the Roman Empire and becoming prominent in the mercantilist policies of the 16th and 18th centuries. Economist Adam Smith, known for his book Wealth of Nations, argued that tariffs can disrupt free trade, but he noted 2 exceptions: protecting industries critical to national security and counteracting tariffs imposed by other nations. These points remain relevant in modern trade discussions. When examining trade surpluses and deficits globally, China leads with a significant surplus, while countries like the U.S., UK, and India experience deficits. Tariffs can serve as leverage to balance these relationships and ensure fair trade practices. Understanding tariffs and trade negotiations is key to grasping how governments seek to protect their economies and industries in a globalized world. Source: Patrick Bet-David , @ValuetainmentTV

Mario Nawfal

322,734 просмотров • 1 год назад

Arnab Tears Into Trump’s Tariff Deadline Praises PM Modi For Putting Nation First Arnab Goswami sharply criticized President Trump's threats of 500% tariffs on countries like India buying Russian oil, calling it economic bullying amid global instability. In a January 8, 2026, segment, he praised PM Narendra Modi for prioritizing national interest over external pressure, emphasizing India's sovereign energy policy. Goswami outlined six strategic points for India to counter the threats independently. Tariff Threat Context Trump's administration advanced a bill imposing at least 500% tariffs on imports from nations trading Russian petroleum or uranium, targeting India's discounted oil purchases from Russia. This follows US seizures of Russian-flagged tankers and Trump's exits from over 66 international bodies, including India's solar alliance. Indian officials rejected related claims of stalled trade deals due to Modi's unresponsiveness. Key Criticisms Goswami dismissed viewing Trump as mere amusement, warning of his global bullying post-Venezuela operations and threats to multiple nations. He questioned the feasibility but stressed preparation, assuming Trump would act unreasonably. In his interview with Jeffrey Sachs, both highlighted US instability and urged India to avoid alignments like the Quad. Praise for PM Modi Goswami expressed full confidence in the Modi government's firm stance, refusing further accommodation beyond limits. Modi refused US trade terms harming Indian farmers and fishermen, leading to higher tariffs but upholding "nation first." This aligns with India's rejection of pressure on Russian oil deals. India's Six-Point Strategy Goswami proposed proactive steps assuming worst-case tariffs: 🔴 Reaffirm energy policy driven by national interest, not US pressure. 🔴 Maintain cordial US ties while building alternatives with Europe and others. 🔴 Boost indigenous defense to reduce reliance on American supplies. 🔴 Position India as Global South leader amid US estrangement. 🔴 Leverage US firms in India to prevent isolation, as America needs the market. 🔴 Accelerate self-reliance in defense R&D, green hydrogen, and energy independence. Credit : Republic Media Network.

Arnab Tears Into Trump’s Tariff Deadline Praises PM Modi For Putting Nation First Arnab Goswami sharply criticized President Trump's threats of 500% tariffs on countries like India buying Russian oil, calling it economic bullying amid global instability. In a January 8, 2026, segment, he praised PM Narendra Modi for prioritizing national interest over external pressure, emphasizing India's sovereign energy policy. Goswami outlined six strategic points for India to counter the threats independently. Tariff Threat Context Trump's administration advanced a bill imposing at least 500% tariffs on imports from nations trading Russian petroleum or uranium, targeting India's discounted oil purchases from Russia. This follows US seizures of Russian-flagged tankers and Trump's exits from over 66 international bodies, including India's solar alliance. Indian officials rejected related claims of stalled trade deals due to Modi's unresponsiveness. Key Criticisms Goswami dismissed viewing Trump as mere amusement, warning of his global bullying post-Venezuela operations and threats to multiple nations. He questioned the feasibility but stressed preparation, assuming Trump would act unreasonably. In his interview with Jeffrey Sachs, both highlighted US instability and urged India to avoid alignments like the Quad. Praise for PM Modi Goswami expressed full confidence in the Modi government's firm stance, refusing further accommodation beyond limits. Modi refused US trade terms harming Indian farmers and fishermen, leading to higher tariffs but upholding "nation first." This aligns with India's rejection of pressure on Russian oil deals. India's Six-Point Strategy Goswami proposed proactive steps assuming worst-case tariffs: 🔴 Reaffirm energy policy driven by national interest, not US pressure. 🔴 Maintain cordial US ties while building alternatives with Europe and others. 🔴 Boost indigenous defense to reduce reliance on American supplies. 🔴 Position India as Global South leader amid US estrangement. 🔴 Leverage US firms in India to prevent isolation, as America needs the market. 🔴 Accelerate self-reliance in defense R&D, green hydrogen, and energy independence. Credit : Republic Media Network.

Augadh

30,820 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

No cards left to play? Trump's sweeping 50% tariffs on Chinese imports are now in effect, pushing the total rate to a staggering 104%. Warwick Powell, adjunct professor at QUT, says China is playing the long game, diversifying away from the U.S. while adhering to WTO rules. With little leverage left, can Washington really afford this trade war? #TradeWar #USChina #Tariffs

No cards left to play? Trump's sweeping 50% tariffs on Chinese imports are now in effect, pushing the total rate to a staggering 104%. Warwick Powell, adjunct professor at QUT, says China is playing the long game, diversifying away from the U.S. while adhering to WTO rules. With little leverage left, can Washington really afford this trade war? #TradeWar #USChina #Tariffs

Liu Xin刘欣

210,894 просмотров • 1 год назад

DUMB TRUMP DIDN'T EVEN REALISE .Narendra Modi JI IS 10 STEPS AHEAD OF HIM! Trump's pressure on EU to impose 100% Tariffs on Bharat ISN'T GOING TO WORK! Bharat's Exports to EU will remain INTACT by rerouting. MODI'S MASTERSTROKE: BHARAT- EFTA FTA🔥Tariff Shield Against Trump! In a shrewd geopolitical maneuver, Modi Sarkar has orchestrated a masterstroke with the Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) signed with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)—comprising Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland—in March 2024, which took effect on October 1, 2025. Amid escalating U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff blitz—including a 50% levy on Bharatiya imports and his September 2025 push for the EU to impose up to 100% duties on Bharatiya goods over Russian oil purchases—this deal fortifies Bharatiya export fortress by granting duty-free access to 99% of EFTA markets for key sectors like textiles, pharmaceuticals, and engineering goods. As non-EU nations deeply embedded in the European Economic Area (EEA) and bilateral pacts with the EU, the EFTA quartet serves as a seamless conduit, enabling Bharatiya exporters to route goods through their low-tariff hubs for re-export into the broader European single market, sidestepping potential EU barriers without violating rules of origin. This not only sustains Bharat's $100+ billion annual EU trade flow but also attracts a pledged $100 billion in EFTA investments over 15 years, fueling domestic manufacturing and job creation—turning Trump's protectionist pressure into an opportunity for diversified, resilient supply chains that bolster Bharat's global trade sovereignty. Trump can keep licking his ego, Bharat will keep scaling high.

DUMB TRUMP DIDN'T EVEN REALISE .Narendra Modi JI IS 10 STEPS AHEAD OF HIM! Trump's pressure on EU to impose 100% Tariffs on Bharat ISN'T GOING TO WORK! Bharat's Exports to EU will remain INTACT by rerouting. MODI'S MASTERSTROKE: BHARAT- EFTA FTA🔥Tariff Shield Against Trump! In a shrewd geopolitical maneuver, Modi Sarkar has orchestrated a masterstroke with the Trade and Economic Partnership Agreement (TEPA) signed with the European Free Trade Association (EFTA)—comprising Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland—in March 2024, which took effect on October 1, 2025. Amid escalating U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff blitz—including a 50% levy on Bharatiya imports and his September 2025 push for the EU to impose up to 100% duties on Bharatiya goods over Russian oil purchases—this deal fortifies Bharatiya export fortress by granting duty-free access to 99% of EFTA markets for key sectors like textiles, pharmaceuticals, and engineering goods. As non-EU nations deeply embedded in the European Economic Area (EEA) and bilateral pacts with the EU, the EFTA quartet serves as a seamless conduit, enabling Bharatiya exporters to route goods through their low-tariff hubs for re-export into the broader European single market, sidestepping potential EU barriers without violating rules of origin. This not only sustains Bharat's $100+ billion annual EU trade flow but also attracts a pledged $100 billion in EFTA investments over 15 years, fueling domestic manufacturing and job creation—turning Trump's protectionist pressure into an opportunity for diversified, resilient supply chains that bolster Bharat's global trade sovereignty. Trump can keep licking his ego, Bharat will keep scaling high.

BhikuMhatre

440,941 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

“Tariffs make inflation go down — 150 years of data proves it.” In this conversation, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent joins John Carney & myself to break down why critics got tariffs completely wrong. Instead of inflation and trade wars, the U.S. saw low inflation, new trade deals, and a surge in reshoring as companies returned home. Bessent explains how a gutted manufacturing base changed the equation: tariffs now rebuild strategic industries, boost GDP, and generate revenue while bringing jobs back. As growth rises, tariffs can melt away — replaced by stronger wages and higher tax income from revitalized American industry. And why hasn’t the world retaliated? Simple: every global company needs access to the U.S. market. Trump understood that leverage instinctively — and he was right.

“Tariffs make inflation go down — 150 years of data proves it.” In this conversation, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent joins John Carney & myself to break down why critics got tariffs completely wrong. Instead of inflation and trade wars, the U.S. saw low inflation, new trade deals, and a surge in reshoring as companies returned home. Bessent explains how a gutted manufacturing base changed the equation: tariffs now rebuild strategic industries, boost GDP, and generate revenue while bringing jobs back. As growth rises, tariffs can melt away — replaced by stronger wages and higher tax income from revitalized American industry. And why hasn’t the world retaliated? Simple: every global company needs access to the U.S. market. Trump understood that leverage instinctively — and he was right.

Alex Marlow

14,092 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

This is the exact moment in 2019 when India's international diplomacy was royally screwed. Narendra Modi shamelessly broke India's decades old policy of not interfering in internal elections of other countries by openly campaigning for Presidential candidate Donald J Trump. Trump lost this election and India kept losing its MoJo with the United States. The Biden administration was naturally upset with this and showed no love for India. After Trump's return, he has been even more hostile towards Indians, from calling out on Tariffs , to not taking a stand for India, approving IMF loans to Pakistan to trade deals with Türkiye. Modi needs to apologize to the nation for this shameful act, he lowered India's dignity and got hostility in return.

This is the exact moment in 2019 when India's international diplomacy was royally screwed. Narendra Modi shamelessly broke India's decades old policy of not interfering in internal elections of other countries by openly campaigning for Presidential candidate Donald J Trump. Trump lost this election and India kept losing its MoJo with the United States. The Biden administration was naturally upset with this and showed no love for India. After Trump's return, he has been even more hostile towards Indians, from calling out on Tariffs , to not taking a stand for India, approving IMF loans to Pakistan to trade deals with Türkiye. Modi needs to apologize to the nation for this shameful act, he lowered India's dignity and got hostility in return.

Roshan Rai

181,439 просмотров • 1 год назад

Trump just torpedoed billions in potential U.S.-India defense deals with one reckless, narcissistic remark about using trade as leverage to pressure India. In a single stroke, he confirmed every fear Indian defense planners have: that America is an unreliable partner willing to weaponize even its own alliances. If trade can be used as blackmail, imagine the leverage the U.S. would try to exert by controlling critical defense platforms during a conflict. No sovereign nation wants to be held hostage by a foreign supplier—especially one as erratic as Trump. With this gaffe, he’s single-handedly killed years of bipartisan diplomacy and trust-building. The result? U.S.-India defense cooperation is now in the grave—and the American defense industry can thank Trump for lighting the match.

Trump just torpedoed billions in potential U.S.-India defense deals with one reckless, narcissistic remark about using trade as leverage to pressure India. In a single stroke, he confirmed every fear Indian defense planners have: that America is an unreliable partner willing to weaponize even its own alliances. If trade can be used as blackmail, imagine the leverage the U.S. would try to exert by controlling critical defense platforms during a conflict. No sovereign nation wants to be held hostage by a foreign supplier—especially one as erratic as Trump. With this gaffe, he’s single-handedly killed years of bipartisan diplomacy and trust-building. The result? U.S.-India defense cooperation is now in the grave—and the American defense industry can thank Trump for lighting the match.

Sandeep Neel

732,539 просмотров • 1 год назад

USA threw everything it had at India. Failed. > Trump slapped tariffs on India. > India kept buying Russian oil. > Modi lined up China, Russia, Brazil. > Doval met Putin. Jaishankar in Moscow. > India called out US tariffs as “unfair & unreasonable.” > US imposed 50% tariffs. > India: “energy sovereignty non-negotiable.” > Trade talks collapsed. > Modi spoke with Putin, Zelenskyy, balancing all sides. > India, Brazil, South Africa pushed “rules-based trade.” > Wang Yi came to Delhi, Meeting with PM Modi. > Multiple Putin calls in just 3 weeks. Three Fronts, One Strategy US → confrontation Russia → coordination China & ASEAN → diversification Ukraine → Peace Talks. Message is clear from New Delhi: India will not bend. India will not retreat. India will not be isolated. Maximum pressure applied by Trump. Result? Washington only got frustration.

USA threw everything it had at India. Failed. > Trump slapped tariffs on India. > India kept buying Russian oil. > Modi lined up China, Russia, Brazil. > Doval met Putin. Jaishankar in Moscow. > India called out US tariffs as “unfair & unreasonable.” > US imposed 50% tariffs. > India: “energy sovereignty non-negotiable.” > Trade talks collapsed. > Modi spoke with Putin, Zelenskyy, balancing all sides. > India, Brazil, South Africa pushed “rules-based trade.” > Wang Yi came to Delhi, Meeting with PM Modi. > Multiple Putin calls in just 3 weeks. Three Fronts, One Strategy US → confrontation Russia → coordination China & ASEAN → diversification Ukraine → Peace Talks. Message is clear from New Delhi: India will not bend. India will not retreat. India will not be isolated. Maximum pressure applied by Trump. Result? Washington only got frustration.

Anurag

196,722 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

While the world navigates economic uncertainty, India hits fast-forward on #AtmanirbharBharat by sealing the “mother of all trade deals” with the EU. 🇮🇳🤝🇪🇺 And the world is applauding — because this isn’t just another agreement. 𝐈𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐬 𝐠𝐥𝐨𝐛𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐬 📌 Why this deal is turning heads: * Covers one-third of global trade * Represents one-fourth of global GDP * 96.6% of EU exports to India get tariff cuts or eliminations * EU exports to India set to double by 2032 * Auto import duty slashed from 110% to just 10% 🚗 * Zero tariffs on machinery, aircraft & medical equipment Under the leadership of PM Shri Narendra Modi, India isn’t waiting for the future. India is the future. 🇮🇳🔥

While the world navigates economic uncertainty, India hits fast-forward on #AtmanirbharBharat by sealing the “mother of all trade deals” with the EU. 🇮🇳🤝🇪🇺 And the world is applauding — because this isn’t just another agreement. 𝐈𝐭 𝐫𝐞𝐬𝐡𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐬 𝐠𝐥𝐨𝐛𝐚𝐥 𝐞𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐨𝐦𝐢𝐜𝐬 📌 Why this deal is turning heads: * Covers one-third of global trade * Represents one-fourth of global GDP * 96.6% of EU exports to India get tariff cuts or eliminations * EU exports to India set to double by 2032 * Auto import duty slashed from 110% to just 10% 🚗 * Zero tariffs on machinery, aircraft & medical equipment Under the leadership of PM Shri Narendra Modi, India isn’t waiting for the future. India is the future. 🇮🇳🔥

BJP

11,319 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨 In an interview with Fox Business, President Donald Trump recounted his tough negotiating approach with Switzerland on trade issues: "Switzerland was paying almost zero tariffs on their exports to the United States, and we had a massive trade deficit of $42 billion with them. So I hit them with 30% tariffs. Then I received an emergency call from the President of Switzerland (Karin Keller-Sutter). I didn’t like her tone at all — she was very aggressive and demanding. Instead of lowering the tariffs as I had been considering, I immediately raised them to 39%." Trump added that he felt the original 30% was still too low, especially given the size of the ongoing trade deficit. ### The Final Outcome of This Strategy: After months of pressure and negotiations, the United States and Switzerland reached a historic framework agreement in November 2025. Under the deal, the U.S. reduced tariffs on most Swiss goods to 15% (matching the level applied to the European Union). In return, major Swiss companies (such as Novartis, Roche, ABB, and others) committed to investing up to $200 billion in the United States by 2028 — including $67 billion in 2026 alone. This is expected to create thousands of American jobs and help reduce the trade deficit. This story perfectly illustrates Trump’s “Reciprocal Trade” policy: using tariffs as a powerful leverage tool to secure better deals for America, even if it involves strong personal reactions during negotiations. What do you think about President Trump's bold tariff strategy with Switzerland? Do you see this as smart, results-driven negotiation that puts America first, or do you worry it risks escalating trade tensions? Would you like Trump to apply this same reciprocal trade approach with other countries running large deficits with the U.S.?"

🚨 In an interview with Fox Business, President Donald Trump recounted his tough negotiating approach with Switzerland on trade issues: "Switzerland was paying almost zero tariffs on their exports to the United States, and we had a massive trade deficit of $42 billion with them. So I hit them with 30% tariffs. Then I received an emergency call from the President of Switzerland (Karin Keller-Sutter). I didn’t like her tone at all — she was very aggressive and demanding. Instead of lowering the tariffs as I had been considering, I immediately raised them to 39%." Trump added that he felt the original 30% was still too low, especially given the size of the ongoing trade deficit. ### The Final Outcome of This Strategy: After months of pressure and negotiations, the United States and Switzerland reached a historic framework agreement in November 2025. Under the deal, the U.S. reduced tariffs on most Swiss goods to 15% (matching the level applied to the European Union). In return, major Swiss companies (such as Novartis, Roche, ABB, and others) committed to investing up to $200 billion in the United States by 2028 — including $67 billion in 2026 alone. This is expected to create thousands of American jobs and help reduce the trade deficit. This story perfectly illustrates Trump’s “Reciprocal Trade” policy: using tariffs as a powerful leverage tool to secure better deals for America, even if it involves strong personal reactions during negotiations. What do you think about President Trump's bold tariff strategy with Switzerland? Do you see this as smart, results-driven negotiation that puts America first, or do you worry it risks escalating trade tensions? Would you like Trump to apply this same reciprocal trade approach with other countries running large deficits with the U.S.?"

Stand Up For Trump

21,465 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Trump’s Tariffs: 40 Years in the Making 🇺🇸💰 On E221, the besties discussed President Trump's newly announced 25% auto tariffs. Chamath Palihapitiya: " The one thing I'll say about Donald Trump is you may not agree with the tariffs, but he's been incredibly consistent." "I stumbled into an interview he did with Larry King in 1987, and he walked through the entire trade imbalance 40 years ago." Donald J. Trump in 1987: " The fact is that you don't have free trade. We think of it as free trade, but you right now don't have free trade." Chamath: "Here's what tariffs do: tariffs are a level-setting mechanism that fixes a historical imbalance." "What they want is to create the economic incentives to re-shore as much industry as possible into the United States."

Trump’s Tariffs: 40 Years in the Making 🇺🇸💰 On E221, the besties discussed President Trump's newly announced 25% auto tariffs. Chamath Palihapitiya: " The one thing I'll say about Donald Trump is you may not agree with the tariffs, but he's been incredibly consistent." "I stumbled into an interview he did with Larry King in 1987, and he walked through the entire trade imbalance 40 years ago." Donald J. Trump in 1987: " The fact is that you don't have free trade. We think of it as free trade, but you right now don't have free trade." Chamath: "Here's what tariffs do: tariffs are a level-setting mechanism that fixes a historical imbalance." "What they want is to create the economic incentives to re-shore as much industry as possible into the United States."

The All-In Podcast

117,477 просмотров • 1 год назад

🇺🇸🇪🇺 TRUMP ESCALATES TRADE WAR: 50% EU TARIFF SET FOR JUNE 1 Trump announced a 50% tariff on European imports starting June 1, citing stalled negotiations and a $250 billion U.S. trade deficit. He said the EU’s trade barriers, tax schemes, and lawsuits leave the U.S. with no alternative. Minutes earlier, he warned Apple of a 25% tariff on all foreign-made iPhones sold in the U.S. Stock futures dropped. The EU hasn’t responded. Trump says he’s not seeking a deal. The directive is clear: build in the U.S. or face penalties. Markets are reacting. Europe has days to respond. Apple is directly in the line of fire. Source: CNBC

🇺🇸🇪🇺 TRUMP ESCALATES TRADE WAR: 50% EU TARIFF SET FOR JUNE 1 Trump announced a 50% tariff on European imports starting June 1, citing stalled negotiations and a $250 billion U.S. trade deficit. He said the EU’s trade barriers, tax schemes, and lawsuits leave the U.S. with no alternative. Minutes earlier, he warned Apple of a 25% tariff on all foreign-made iPhones sold in the U.S. Stock futures dropped. The EU hasn’t responded. Trump says he’s not seeking a deal. The directive is clear: build in the U.S. or face penalties. Markets are reacting. Europe has days to respond. Apple is directly in the line of fire. Source: CNBC

Mario Nawfal

135,660 просмотров • 1 год назад

#BREAKING: Canada after US reacts to India-EU ‘Mother of all deals’, takes potshot on Trump administration for Tariff policy. Canada's Energy Minister Timothy Hodgson praises India-EU deal, weeks before Canadian PM Mark Carney’s visit to India to yet again kickstart CEPA trade agreement negotiations. Indian Commerce Minister likely to visit Canada as well for Trade talks. “What India just did with the EU signing the mother of all deals was a perfect way of saying we will not live in a world where might makes right. We will not live in a world where the strongest put tariffs on everyone else”.

#BREAKING: Canada after US reacts to India-EU ‘Mother of all deals’, takes potshot on Trump administration for Tariff policy. Canada's Energy Minister Timothy Hodgson praises India-EU deal, weeks before Canadian PM Mark Carney’s visit to India to yet again kickstart CEPA trade agreement negotiations. Indian Commerce Minister likely to visit Canada as well for Trade talks. “What India just did with the EU signing the mother of all deals was a perfect way of saying we will not live in a world where might makes right. We will not live in a world where the strongest put tariffs on everyone else”.

Aditya Raj Kaul

247,232 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Left: Rachel Reeves is celebrating £125 million a year in extra trade with China Right: Your reminder that Brexit has cost the UK £13.5 billion in trade a year To make up for the lost UK-EU trade, Labour needs to find 108 similarly updated trade deals Labour is going around the world picking up scraps of trade, when the European Union is on our doorstep The Conservatives may have started this, but Labour's continuance of keeping outside the EU Single Market is making the UK poorer And if Labour introduce spending cuts on public services - as is rumoured, that increased poverty will be because of Brexit and keeping us outside the EU Single Market

Left: Rachel Reeves is celebrating £125 million a year in extra trade with China Right: Your reminder that Brexit has cost the UK £13.5 billion in trade a year To make up for the lost UK-EU trade, Labour needs to find 108 similarly updated trade deals Labour is going around the world picking up scraps of trade, when the European Union is on our doorstep The Conservatives may have started this, but Labour's continuance of keeping outside the EU Single Market is making the UK poorer And if Labour introduce spending cuts on public services - as is rumoured, that increased poverty will be because of Brexit and keeping us outside the EU Single Market

Farrukh

168,182 просмотров • 1 год назад