Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

“Tariffs make inflation go down — 150 years of data proves it.” In this conversation, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent joins John Carney & myself to break down why critics got tariffs completely wrong. Instead of inflation and trade wars, the U.S. saw low inflation, new trade deals, and a...

AlexMarlow's profile picture

Alex Marlow

69,290 subscribers

14,092 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent INFURIATES MSNBC panel after expertly explaining how tariffs have actually helped Americans "Tariffs help consumers because [we] have brought down the budget deficit. MIT came out with a study that said that 42% of the great inflation was caused by the big deficit spending." "So as you bring down deficit spending, inflation will come down. Right now, we've taken substantial tariff income over time that will rebalance as the factories move to the U.S. and that will become the corporate income or wage income - and by bringing down the budget deficit, we are bringing down inflation!" Scott is setting the record straight!
0:44

🚨 JUST IN: Treasury Sec. Scott Bessent INFURIATES MSNBC panel after expertly explaining how tariffs have actually helped Americans "Tariffs help consumers because [we] have brought down the budget deficit. MIT came out with a study that said that 42% of the great inflation was caused by the big deficit spending." "So as you bring down deficit spending, inflation will come down. Right now, we've taken substantial tariff income over time that will rebalance as the factories move to the U.S. and that will become the corporate income or wage income - and by bringing down the budget deficit, we are bringing down inflation!" Scott is setting the record straight!

Eric Daugherty

477,289 views • 9 months ago

All-In Interview: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent! -- 2025 economic recap -- What to expect in 2026 -- Fixing the Fed -- Tariffs for national security leverage -- Solving affordability (0:00) Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent joins the show (0:55) Recapping 2025 and the state of the economy (3:13) Tariffs: Leverage, legal challenges, implementation (15:20) Affordability: inflation, BLS data, interest rates (23:00) The Fed: biggest mistakes, how we got a 15 year asset bubble, rate cycle, appetite for US debt, Fed Chair candidates (42:44) Focus on Main Street, taking equity stakes in American companies (50:40) Tax cuts, Trump accounts, economic legacy Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent
56:57

All-In Interview: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent! -- 2025 economic recap -- What to expect in 2026 -- Fixing the Fed -- Tariffs for national security leverage -- Solving affordability (0:00) Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent joins the show (0:55) Recapping 2025 and the state of the economy (3:13) Tariffs: Leverage, legal challenges, implementation (15:20) Affordability: inflation, BLS data, interest rates (23:00) The Fed: biggest mistakes, how we got a 15 year asset bubble, rate cycle, appetite for US debt, Fed Chair candidates (42:44) Focus on Main Street, taking equity stakes in American companies (50:40) Tax cuts, Trump accounts, economic legacy Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent

The All-In Podcast

1,010,208 views • 8 months ago

BREAKING: Treasury Secretary CONFIRMS Trump’s plan to swap income tax for tariffs — “There is a good chance we’ll see it in the upcoming tax bill.” In a bombshell moment during the White House press briefing, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just confirmed that tariff revenue could immediately fund tax relief for working Americans. Asked whether the U.S. would prioritize long-term tariff revenue or future trade deals, Bessent said: “I think it is a combination of both.” He explained that talks are already underway with 17 of America’s 18 key trading partners—and many are already flying into Washington. But the biggest news? “What President Trump is referring to is the ability for tariff revenue to give income tax relief,” Bessent said. “I think there is a good chance we will see this in the upcoming tax bill.” Trump’s vision: – No tax on tips – No tax on Social Security – No tax on overtime – Restored auto loan interest deductibility (for American-made vehicles) According to Bessent, tariff income could cover those tax cuts right away. When asked if tariffs will play a long-term role in U.S. fiscal policy, Bessent didn’t hesitate: “Tariffs will bring back American manufacturing and generate substantial revenues.”
1:36

BREAKING: Treasury Secretary CONFIRMS Trump’s plan to swap income tax for tariffs — “There is a good chance we’ll see it in the upcoming tax bill.” In a bombshell moment during the White House press briefing, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just confirmed that tariff revenue could immediately fund tax relief for working Americans. Asked whether the U.S. would prioritize long-term tariff revenue or future trade deals, Bessent said: “I think it is a combination of both.” He explained that talks are already underway with 17 of America’s 18 key trading partners—and many are already flying into Washington. But the biggest news? “What President Trump is referring to is the ability for tariff revenue to give income tax relief,” Bessent said. “I think there is a good chance we will see this in the upcoming tax bill.” Trump’s vision: – No tax on tips – No tax on Social Security – No tax on overtime – Restored auto loan interest deductibility (for American-made vehicles) According to Bessent, tariff income could cover those tax cuts right away. When asked if tariffs will play a long-term role in U.S. fiscal policy, Bessent didn’t hesitate: “Tariffs will bring back American manufacturing and generate substantial revenues.”

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

537,752 views • 1 year ago

🇺🇸Trump’s Tariff Plan Explained: Destroy or Help The US Economy? Trump describes tariffs as his "favorite word." To understand the concept, think of it like this: Imagine you’re an accountant seeking business referrals. You meet someone who sells auto insurance, and you agree to exchange referrals equally. A month later, you’ve given them five referrals, but they haven’t given you any. You now have a "referral deficit" while they have a "referral surplus." This is similar to a trade deficit versus a trade surplus. Now, on a larger scale, the U.S. has a global trade deficit of $1.1 trillion, meaning it has provided $1.1 trillion more business to other countries than it has received. China, on the other hand, has a trade surplus of $823 billion, receiving more business than it gives. Trump’s use of tariffs is an attempt to address these imbalances and renegotiate trade deals. Tariffs are tools that governments can use to create leverage in trade negotiations. Historically, tariffs have been used as a form of taxation on imports, dating back to the Roman Empire and becoming prominent in the mercantilist policies of the 16th and 18th centuries. Economist Adam Smith, known for his book Wealth of Nations, argued that tariffs can disrupt free trade, but he noted 2 exceptions: protecting industries critical to national security and counteracting tariffs imposed by other nations. These points remain relevant in modern trade discussions. When examining trade surpluses and deficits globally, China leads with a significant surplus, while countries like the U.S., UK, and India experience deficits. Tariffs can serve as leverage to balance these relationships and ensure fair trade practices. Understanding tariffs and trade negotiations is key to grasping how governments seek to protect their economies and industries in a globalized world. Source: Patrick Bet-David , @ValuetainmentTV
14:05

🇺🇸Trump’s Tariff Plan Explained: Destroy or Help The US Economy? Trump describes tariffs as his "favorite word." To understand the concept, think of it like this: Imagine you’re an accountant seeking business referrals. You meet someone who sells auto insurance, and you agree to exchange referrals equally. A month later, you’ve given them five referrals, but they haven’t given you any. You now have a "referral deficit" while they have a "referral surplus." This is similar to a trade deficit versus a trade surplus. Now, on a larger scale, the U.S. has a global trade deficit of $1.1 trillion, meaning it has provided $1.1 trillion more business to other countries than it has received. China, on the other hand, has a trade surplus of $823 billion, receiving more business than it gives. Trump’s use of tariffs is an attempt to address these imbalances and renegotiate trade deals. Tariffs are tools that governments can use to create leverage in trade negotiations. Historically, tariffs have been used as a form of taxation on imports, dating back to the Roman Empire and becoming prominent in the mercantilist policies of the 16th and 18th centuries. Economist Adam Smith, known for his book Wealth of Nations, argued that tariffs can disrupt free trade, but he noted 2 exceptions: protecting industries critical to national security and counteracting tariffs imposed by other nations. These points remain relevant in modern trade discussions. When examining trade surpluses and deficits globally, China leads with a significant surplus, while countries like the U.S., UK, and India experience deficits. Tariffs can serve as leverage to balance these relationships and ensure fair trade practices. Understanding tariffs and trade negotiations is key to grasping how governments seek to protect their economies and industries in a globalized world. Source: Patrick Bet-David , @ValuetainmentTV

Mario Nawfal

322,734 views • 1 year ago

BREAKING: WOW! Ted Cruz just lashed out against Tariffs on his Podcast: “If we are in a scenario 30 days from now, 60 days from now, 90 days from now, with massive American tariffs and massive tariffs on American goods, that is a TERRIBLE SCENARIO!” “We have seen when one country jacks up tariffs, it can provoke a trade war, where each country accelerates tariffs, and the results would do a couple of things. It would DESTROY JOBS here at home and do real damage to the economy…. This is going to have a POWERFUL UPWARD IMPACT ON INFLATION.”
2:26

BREAKING: WOW! Ted Cruz just lashed out against Tariffs on his Podcast: “If we are in a scenario 30 days from now, 60 days from now, 90 days from now, with massive American tariffs and massive tariffs on American goods, that is a TERRIBLE SCENARIO!” “We have seen when one country jacks up tariffs, it can provoke a trade war, where each country accelerates tariffs, and the results would do a couple of things. It would DESTROY JOBS here at home and do real damage to the economy…. This is going to have a POWERFUL UPWARD IMPACT ON INFLATION.”

Brian Krassenstein

829,353 views • 1 year ago

Modi didn't just survive Trump's 50% tariffs, he used them as leverage to reshape India's entire trade architecture. By sequencing landmark free trade agreements with the UK and EU before engaging Washington, Modi created a multilateral pressure system that forced Trump to slash tariffs from 50% to 18% in weeks. This is textbook strategic trade negotiation, using bilateral deals as compounding bargaining chips in a multipolar economy. India's pivot toward European market access while managing U.S. demands on Russian oil imports reveals a foreign policy playbook built on leverage sequencing, not compliance. The shift in India-EU trade relations alone covers 25% of global GDP.
1:18

Modi didn't just survive Trump's 50% tariffs, he used them as leverage to reshape India's entire trade architecture. By sequencing landmark free trade agreements with the UK and EU before engaging Washington, Modi created a multilateral pressure system that forced Trump to slash tariffs from 50% to 18% in weeks. This is textbook strategic trade negotiation, using bilateral deals as compounding bargaining chips in a multipolar economy. India's pivot toward European market access while managing U.S. demands on Russian oil imports reveals a foreign policy playbook built on leverage sequencing, not compliance. The shift in India-EU trade relations alone covers 25% of global GDP.

JIX5A

55,482 views • 6 months ago

Trump Raised Tariffs on South Korea — Here’s the Real Reason. You Can’t Have U.S. Troops and Side With China. President Trump just raised U.S. tariffs on South Korea from 15% to 25% — and this had nothing to do with trade paperwork. This was a strategic warning. In this video, I break down why South Korea crossed a red line by declaring “neutrality” between the United States and China, why U.S. protection is no longer free, and how Trump is rewriting the rules for American allies. Using hard trade data, I show why South Korea’s economy actually depends more on the U.S. than China, how Beijing steals IP from Korean firms like Samsung while trying to replace them, and why China will never truly trust Seoul because of North Korea.
9:42

Trump Raised Tariffs on South Korea — Here’s the Real Reason. You Can’t Have U.S. Troops and Side With China. President Trump just raised U.S. tariffs on South Korea from 15% to 25% — and this had nothing to do with trade paperwork. This was a strategic warning. In this video, I break down why South Korea crossed a red line by declaring “neutrality” between the United States and China, why U.S. protection is no longer free, and how Trump is rewriting the rules for American allies. Using hard trade data, I show why South Korea’s economy actually depends more on the U.S. than China, how Beijing steals IP from Korean firms like Samsung while trying to replace them, and why China will never truly trust Seoul because of North Korea.

Ken Cao-The China Crash Chronicle

36,481 views • 7 months ago

WATCH: White House officials just released a lecture on why the tariffs are a game changer. Stephen Miller really understands it. "Well, the announcement today is the most significant action on global trade policy that has taken place in our lifetimes. It's not even a close call. I mean, this is probably the biggest event that's happened on global trade since the very ill-fated decision that we are now reversing of knocking down all of America's trade tariffs and revenue policies that led to the offshoring and outsourcing of all industry." "This is the great onshoring, the great reshoring of American jobs and wealth."
3:13

WATCH: White House officials just released a lecture on why the tariffs are a game changer. Stephen Miller really understands it. "Well, the announcement today is the most significant action on global trade policy that has taken place in our lifetimes. It's not even a close call. I mean, this is probably the biggest event that's happened on global trade since the very ill-fated decision that we are now reversing of knocking down all of America's trade tariffs and revenue policies that led to the offshoring and outsourcing of all industry." "This is the great onshoring, the great reshoring of American jobs and wealth."

George

1,165,135 views • 1 year ago

ABC News’ Jonathan Karl: “How does [Trump] respond that the Supreme Court says the tariffs, the reciprocal tariffs are unconstitutional?” Scott Jennings: “He’ll be apoplectic because the president believes that the tariff strategy is working. Look at GDP growth. Look at the stock market. Inflation is coming down. Growth’s going up. He thinks — and Bessent, you talk to Bessent, he thinks we’re going to have a boom in 2026 because of the long-term reengineering of the U.S. economy they’ve employed, largely on the back of tariffs. But he’ll be apoplectic.” “And, of course, it would also depend on whether the court rules that you have to give the money back that’s come in.” “How you ever untangle all that, I don't know. The president would also tell you, it's not just an economic tool. It's a diplomatic tool. He thinks a lot of the conflicts that he solved this year, which he’s very proud of, some of it, maybe more than half of them, were because he had the power to threaten these people with tariffs. And so, he thinks it will make the country weak, the presidency weaker and that it will sort of destabilize what he’s trying to do with the U.S. economy.”
1:18

ABC News’ Jonathan Karl: “How does [Trump] respond that the Supreme Court says the tariffs, the reciprocal tariffs are unconstitutional?” Scott Jennings: “He’ll be apoplectic because the president believes that the tariff strategy is working. Look at GDP growth. Look at the stock market. Inflation is coming down. Growth’s going up. He thinks — and Bessent, you talk to Bessent, he thinks we’re going to have a boom in 2026 because of the long-term reengineering of the U.S. economy they’ve employed, largely on the back of tariffs. But he’ll be apoplectic.” “And, of course, it would also depend on whether the court rules that you have to give the money back that’s come in.” “How you ever untangle all that, I don't know. The president would also tell you, it's not just an economic tool. It's a diplomatic tool. He thinks a lot of the conflicts that he solved this year, which he’s very proud of, some of it, maybe more than half of them, were because he had the power to threaten these people with tariffs. And so, he thinks it will make the country weak, the presidency weaker and that it will sort of destabilize what he’s trying to do with the U.S. economy.”

RedWave Press

526,891 views • 8 months ago

.United States Trade Representative Ambassador Greer explains the tariffs on a set of Canadian imports: "They banned the sale of U.S. liquor and other booze on Canadian shelves. They capped and limited the amount of autos that could be shipped [from] the United States from companies who were reshoring to the U.S., and they also continue to maintain limited space to market access for U.S. dairy ... and so it was a natural consequence, after a year of these measures being in place... for President Donald J. Trump to take action."
1:29

.United States Trade Representative Ambassador Greer explains the tariffs on a set of Canadian imports: "They banned the sale of U.S. liquor and other booze on Canadian shelves. They capped and limited the amount of autos that could be shipped [from] the United States from companies who were reshoring to the U.S., and they also continue to maintain limited space to market access for U.S. dairy ... and so it was a natural consequence, after a year of these measures being in place... for President Donald J. Trump to take action."

Rapid Response 47

155,798 views • 1 month ago