Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

More from the career-ending Oprah interview. Continuing the disrespect eith calling the Princess ā€œKateā€, Oprah brings up the difference in press coverage between #MeghanMarkle and #PrincessCatherine using Markle’s incessant bump cradling as an example-with Catherine it was ā€œpraisedā€ but Markle was called ā€œvainā€. The reason for the difference is...

67,539 views • 9 months ago •via X (Twitter)

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Oprah Winfrey said she called Meghan Markle in early 2018 asking for an interview and was told ā€œit wasn’t the right time.ā€ Now it’s being spun as if the palace blocked it. If Oprah was so interested in Meghan, what stopped her from interviewing her before Harry was even in the picture? Where was that interest when Meghan was just another working actress trying to make it? Where was the sit-down when she was deep in Suits, far from global headlines? No one needed palace permission back then. No one was ā€œbanned.ā€ No palace. No restrictions. No ā€œpeople in the room.ā€ No one to ā€œblockā€ anything. You want to blame the palace as if it was some kind of silencing move, but you fail to understand that instead it exposes what this really is. Meghan Markle was simply not someone Oprah was prioritising for a major sit-down. Nor was Meghan Markle relevant enough for that level of attention. It’s also interesting how Meghan frames it as not being ā€œallowedā€ to speak privately, with others present, as if that’s unusual. She was about to marry into one of the most scrutinised institutions in the world. Of course communications are structured. That’s not some shocking revelation, that’s standard. Then comes the key line. ā€œNow we can speak freely.ā€ ā€œNow I can say yes.ā€ So what changed? It only became ā€œthe right timeā€ once she had the global platform, the title, and the leverage that came with the royal connection. You can’t rewrite this into a story about being silenced by the palace when the timeline shows something much simpler. The demand wasn’t there before Harry. The value wasn’t there before the royal family connection. And suddenly, after everything, we’re supposed to believe this was always about ā€œnot being allowedā€ rather than finally having something to sell. Let that sink it.

Queen Esther

149,986 views • 2 months ago

Here’s the clip from the #HarryandMeghan Oprah shitshow where #MeghanMarkle disparages the #PrincessofWales while repeatedly saying she’s not disparaging her. Markle’s main point is that SHE cried and she did NOT make Catherine cry. How does she know? How does she know she didn’t? She doesn’t. There’s a reason you NEVER hear about the Princess being rude to people or having issues with staff or family-because she doesn’t. #PrincessCatherine is very measured and careful in how she treats others while you hear nothing about Markle than her issues with people, conflict, Markle-ing them, and bullying. So what’s the likely scenario? Markle has countless estrangements, Catherine has none. Markle essentially says that because of the conflict (there’s that word again) with her father before the wedding, apparently everyone should have been kissing her ass and allowing any kind of disrespectful behavior because of a situation she and Harry caused with Thomas Markle. This was Meghan Markle’s SECOND wedding yet she’s acting like she’s brand new at it. She’s visibly angry that the Palace didn’t get into the mud with the press about the crying story-she should be GRATEFUL because it wouldn’t have been flattering to her. She and Harry wanted the Palace to fight every single story that they didn’t like & that’s not how it works-that’s how you give negativity life. But catering to her ego is priority. #MeghanMarkleIsAMeanGirl #MeghanMarkleIsABully #MeghanIsTheProblem

Princess CarParkle šŸ‘‘

118,363 views • 9 months ago

Angelina Jolie EXPOSES Oprah Winfrey ā€Œ Angelina Had Serious Concerns Over ā€œOprah's girls school, as well as Oprah's rumored connection to Hollywood predatorsā€ ā€Œ ā€œBut to believe that you can take them as property and sell them and sell them and it's something from the dark ages. It is just so horrific but it's not isolated to Nigeria. It's no secret that Angelina Jolie has never been a fan of Oprah. However, the tabloids always claim that Angelina snubbed Oprah over her friendship with Jennifer Aniston. However, we're now hearing that Angelina's feud with Oprah was motivated by something much more serious. ā€Œ And Angelina reportedly had serious concerns over Oprah's girls school, as well as Oprah's rumored connection to Hollywood predators. It was called Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls. And it had girls there from grades 8 to 12. But look how weird this is. Number of students, 322. The faculty members, 666. So what's really going on at Oprah's girls school? Does Angelina Jolie know the real truth about Oprah's dark side? Let's break it down. ā€Œ The first time I was in Cambodia was the first time I realized. I think we all have that moment in our lives where we kind of really question how much we know and our education and what we've been told. Angelina Jolie and Oprah Winfrey have both built reputations as philanthropists and humanitarians, and yet they never really got along. In fact, Angelina reportedly has so much animosity towards Oprah that she can't even stand to be in the same room as her. Even when Angelina was stillā€

Wall Street Apes

619,817 views • 2 years ago

I think this is one of the more deluded parts of the Oprah LieFest-Harry talks about how successful the Australia Tour was because of #MeghanMarkle and how effortlessly she connected with people (šŸ˜‚) and that THATS when things changed within the family. She was SO much like Diana that it brought back memories and ā€œjealousyā€. Let me be so for real. I remember the 1983 Australia Tour that Charles & Diana embarked on. I have coffee table books from them commemorating it, I remember the press coverage and the phenomenon that Diana was. Markle has nowhere NEAR replicated that. People are polite, and they’re going to turn out to see Prince Harry’s new wife because there’s a curiosity factor. Go back to Australia now, Doofus. You’ll be lucky if 100 people show up. On William & Catherine’s first tour in Canada, they drew massive crowds-400,00 people at one event, 6,000 at another and between 300,000-800,000 at yet one more. Catherine was a star on this tour, the public reception was called ā€œrapturousā€. While the Harkles Australia tour was successful, it doesn’t even compare. We all know behind the scenes Markle made it a disaster. The current #PrincessofWales isn’t interested in being Diana 2.0. She’s successfully carved out her own spot in history and the Monarchy and didn’t need to exploit a dead woman to do it. #MeghanMarkleExposed #PrinceDoofus #HarryAndMeghan

Princess CarParkle šŸ‘‘

64,247 views • 8 months ago