Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Most PMs saying "we're AI-pilled" would fail a screen share. One founder running a $100M AI startup makes candidates share their screen and show her their actual AI workflow before she hires them. Her finding: almost everyone claiming fluency is what she calls Level 1. Talking to ChatGPT or...

aakashgupta's profile picture

Aakash Gupta

309,467 subscribers

12,642 views • 1 month ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Narrative violation: Anthropic's Head of Growth says we'll need more PMs, not fewer. "While PMs and designers are getting leverage from AI, engineering is getting the most leverage right now. If you think about a default team with 5 engineers, 1 designer, 1 PM—with Claude Code, that five engineers is like 2 to 3x'd, and the PMs and designers have also increased, but now they're managing what is effectively a much larger group of engineers. So though the head count and the org structure hasn't changed, you're now just dealing with a situation of maybe 15-20 engineers, 2 PMs, and 2 designers across the board. We're feeling PM and design is just being squeezed. Just absolutely squeezed. We just need to actually hire a ton more PMs."
0:45

Narrative violation: Anthropic's Head of Growth says we'll need more PMs, not fewer. "While PMs and designers are getting leverage from AI, engineering is getting the most leverage right now. If you think about a default team with 5 engineers, 1 designer, 1 PM—with Claude Code, that five engineers is like 2 to 3x'd, and the PMs and designers have also increased, but now they're managing what is effectively a much larger group of engineers. So though the head count and the org structure hasn't changed, you're now just dealing with a situation of maybe 15-20 engineers, 2 PMs, and 2 designers across the board. We're feeling PM and design is just being squeezed. Just absolutely squeezed. We just need to actually hire a ton more PMs."

Lenny Rachitsky

274,899 views • 4 months ago

THIS GUY JUST BUILT A DRONE THAT TRACKS TARGETS WITH A LASER USING CLAUDE > No robotics team > No engineering degree > No budget He used Claude Code to write the entire system in Python - a drone that locks onto a target, follows it with a laser and corrects its own aim automatically after every attempt. The AI gets more accurate the longer it runs because it learns from every single shot. He's still improving it and this is only the beginning. You have the same tool he used. The article below is about how to actually use it to its full potential.
0:39

THIS GUY JUST BUILT A DRONE THAT TRACKS TARGETS WITH A LASER USING CLAUDE > No robotics team > No engineering degree > No budget He used Claude Code to write the entire system in Python - a drone that locks onto a target, follows it with a laser and corrects its own aim automatically after every attempt. The AI gets more accurate the longer it runs because it learns from every single shot. He's still improving it and this is only the beginning. You have the same tool he used. The article below is about how to actually use it to its full potential.

Anatoli Kopadze

275,518 views • 3 months ago

Today, we launch Tycoon AI: the world’s first operating system for one-person companies. Everyone gets an AI CEO + infinite AI employees(coding, marketing, ops etc.) A year ago, I became the first human CEO replaced by an AI CEO named Astra. Astra helped companies reach 100K+ users and $1M ARR in 30 days. That experiment became Tycoon. Today, Corporate America(e.g. Meta) is telling one story about AI: Fewer people. Fewer jobs. Fewer humans needed. Fuck that story. I believe the opposite. For the first time, one person can build with the operating power of an entire company. One founder. One AI CEO. Infinite AI employees. You text Astra your ideas, goals, tasks, and questions. - She strategizes, assigns work to AI employees, reviews progress, and makes sure it gets done. - She can manage up to 1,000 agents in parallel, 24/7, while you sleep. Tycoon includes built-in AI employees for engineering, marketing, research, content, SEO, finance, legal, support, and video. Astra can also manage Claude Code and Hermes Agent. The old company was built around headcount, managers, meetings, and layers. The new company starts with one person and a dream. Execution belongs to machines. Vision belongs to humans. That is what Tycoon is for. Start your one person company today!
0:40

Today, we launch Tycoon AI: the world’s first operating system for one-person companies. Everyone gets an AI CEO + infinite AI employees(coding, marketing, ops etc.) A year ago, I became the first human CEO replaced by an AI CEO named Astra. Astra helped companies reach 100K+ users and $1M ARR in 30 days. That experiment became Tycoon. Today, Corporate America(e.g. Meta) is telling one story about AI: Fewer people. Fewer jobs. Fewer humans needed. Fuck that story. I believe the opposite. For the first time, one person can build with the operating power of an entire company. One founder. One AI CEO. Infinite AI employees. You text Astra your ideas, goals, tasks, and questions. - She strategizes, assigns work to AI employees, reviews progress, and makes sure it gets done. - She can manage up to 1,000 agents in parallel, 24/7, while you sleep. Tycoon includes built-in AI employees for engineering, marketing, research, content, SEO, finance, legal, support, and video. Astra can also manage Claude Code and Hermes Agent. The old company was built around headcount, managers, meetings, and layers. The new company starts with one person and a dream. Execution belongs to machines. Vision belongs to humans. That is what Tycoon is for. Start your one person company today!

Xiaoyin Qu

688,994 views • 2 months ago

Someone on Reddit built a real operating system using Claude. Not a browser app pretending to be one. An actual OS that runs on bare metal. It's called Fable-OS. The only interface is a sentence. No bash. No commands. You type what you want and an AI agent executes it through direct kernel syscalls. Everything runs in Ring 0. In the demo, the agent realized it didn't have a sound driver. So it found the Intel sound card, built a driver for it from scratch, and played a sound. On its own. The OS writes its own drivers. Evolves itself. The agent's tools are the kernel itself. Open source. Built because the developer got tired of people calling browser apps "AI operating systems." This one actually is.
0:36

Someone on Reddit built a real operating system using Claude. Not a browser app pretending to be one. An actual OS that runs on bare metal. It's called Fable-OS. The only interface is a sentence. No bash. No commands. You type what you want and an AI agent executes it through direct kernel syscalls. Everything runs in Ring 0. In the demo, the agent realized it didn't have a sound driver. So it found the Intel sound card, built a driver for it from scratch, and played a sound. On its own. The OS writes its own drivers. Evolves itself. The agent's tools are the kernel itself. Open source. Built because the developer got tired of people calling browser apps "AI operating systems." This one actually is.

Vaibhav Sisinty

20,562 views • 13 days ago

I tested Gemini 3.1 Flash Live and one thing stood out immediately: the speed. You ask a question. It answers almost instantly. No awkward delay. No clunky back-and-forth. Then it gets more interesting. You can: use voice mode, use webcam mode, share your screen, connect tools, add system instructions, and publish the app to the cloud. So this is not just “voice chat with AI.” It is the beginning of real-time AI agents you can actually ship.
18:11

I tested Gemini 3.1 Flash Live and one thing stood out immediately: the speed. You ask a question. It answers almost instantly. No awkward delay. No clunky back-and-forth. Then it gets more interesting. You can: use voice mode, use webcam mode, share your screen, connect tools, add system instructions, and publish the app to the cloud. So this is not just “voice chat with AI.” It is the beginning of real-time AI agents you can actually ship.

Julian Goldie SEO

21,000 views • 4 months ago

SOMEONE JUST CREATED AI TECHNOLOGY THAT MAKES WIFI SEE THROUGH WALLS. IT READS YOUR HEARTBEAT, BREATHING RATE, AND MOVEMENT ON THE OTHER SIDE. you don't need to be in the room, a camera, or anything except a WiFi signal and an AI that interprets what bounces back this is not a government prototype, this already exists and someone just published it on GitHub this is proof that with AI you can build almost anything you can imagine that's exactly why I put together a guide on Claude features most people don't know exist the article below shows exactly what that looks like in practice
1:09

SOMEONE JUST CREATED AI TECHNOLOGY THAT MAKES WIFI SEE THROUGH WALLS. IT READS YOUR HEARTBEAT, BREATHING RATE, AND MOVEMENT ON THE OTHER SIDE. you don't need to be in the room, a camera, or anything except a WiFi signal and an AI that interprets what bounces back this is not a government prototype, this already exists and someone just published it on GitHub this is proof that with AI you can build almost anything you can imagine that's exactly why I put together a guide on Claude features most people don't know exist the article below shows exactly what that looks like in practice

Anatoli Kopadze

20,762 views • 2 months ago

Boris Cherny, Head of Claude Code at Anthropic: "I do not prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops." The person who built the most used AI coding tool stopped prompting entirely. Most people using it every day are still typing one request at a time. This Github repo changes that. ↳ Seven production loop patterns with real token cost estimates ↳ CLI that scaffolds your entire loop in five minutes ↳ Starters for Grok, Claude Code, Codex, and Opencode The repo gives you the framework. My article covers the mental shift that makes it actually work.
0:31

Boris Cherny, Head of Claude Code at Anthropic: "I do not prompt Claude anymore. I have loops running that prompt Claude. My job is to write loops." The person who built the most used AI coding tool stopped prompting entirely. Most people using it every day are still typing one request at a time. This Github repo changes that. ↳ Seven production loop patterns with real token cost estimates ↳ CLI that scaffolds your entire loop in five minutes ↳ Starters for Grok, Claude Code, Codex, and Opencode The repo gives you the framework. My article covers the mental shift that makes it actually work.

Kanika

20,576 views • 21 days ago

SOMEONE BUILT AN ENTIRE COMPANY BRAIN INSIDE CLAUDE CODE IN 7 DAYS Not Obsidian. Fully custom. A living map of every employee, every agent, every SOP on one screen. Click any node and it opens up: - what department it's in - what SOPs are attached - what it can actually access that permission layer is the whole game an employee opens the chat and the AI already knows their access level, agents, SOPs and tools surface in the conversation like you tagged them by hand Obsidian cannot do this... no dev team. no six month build. no enterprise budget. just Claude Code and one week has everything to build one full guide on building your own team below
1:20

SOMEONE BUILT AN ENTIRE COMPANY BRAIN INSIDE CLAUDE CODE IN 7 DAYS Not Obsidian. Fully custom. A living map of every employee, every agent, every SOP on one screen. Click any node and it opens up: - what department it's in - what SOPs are attached - what it can actually access that permission layer is the whole game an employee opens the chat and the AI already knows their access level, agents, SOPs and tools surface in the conversation like you tagged them by hand Obsidian cannot do this... no dev team. no six month build. no enterprise budget. just Claude Code and one week has everything to build one full guide on building your own team below

Madni Aghadi

396,476 views • 1 month ago

A coin built to be completely private and untouchable just lost half its value in 48 hours because of a crack it didn’t know it had. for FOUR years and an AI is the one that found it imagine the most secure private vault in the world. now imagine finding out there’s been a hole in it the whole time and because it’s private, you can never prove if anyone used it… that’s Zcash. that’s this week. but here’s why everyone should care: the smartest humans missed this bug for 4 years. AI found it instantly. today AI is finding cracks to fix them. tomorrow the same tools find cracks to use them. your bank. your data. every system humans built. AI can now find the weak points faster than we can protect them. a privacy coin was just the first to break in public. it won’t be the last
2:58

A coin built to be completely private and untouchable just lost half its value in 48 hours because of a crack it didn’t know it had. for FOUR years and an AI is the one that found it imagine the most secure private vault in the world. now imagine finding out there’s been a hole in it the whole time and because it’s private, you can never prove if anyone used it… that’s Zcash. that’s this week. but here’s why everyone should care: the smartest humans missed this bug for 4 years. AI found it instantly. today AI is finding cracks to fix them. tomorrow the same tools find cracks to use them. your bank. your data. every system humans built. AI can now find the weak points faster than we can protect them. a privacy coin was just the first to break in public. it won’t be the last

Mika

21,093 views • 2 months ago

A 21 YEAR OLD COLLEGE STUDENT IS CLOSING $12,000 A WEEK IN WEB DESIGN CONTRACTS FROM HER BEDROOM. SHE HAS NEVER WRITTEN A LINE OF HTML. She does not know how to set up a domain. She does not have a portfolio. Her entire agency is one Google Maps tab and a Claude subscription. She runs a move that the rest of the cold-calling internet hasn't figured out yet. Most agencies spend hours building pitch decks, hunting down leads, and begging for 15-minute discovery calls. They show up to meetings with promises. She shows up with the answer already built. Every morning at 9 AM, she opens Google Maps. She searches "nail salon" or "barbershop." She filters for businesses with a 4.7 rating or higher, hundreds of reviews, but no website listed. There are millions of them. Local businesses that are drowning in foot traffic but completely invisible online. She clicks on one. "Natural Nails & Lashes." She highlights every piece of information on their Google profile — the address, the operating hours, the owner's name, and five of the best customer reviews. She copies it all and drops it into Claude. She adds one line: "Write a prompt for an AI website builder using this data. Make it a professional, aesthetic, luxury website. Include the reviews." Claude spits out a master prompt. She copies it, opens Webild io, and pastes it in. She waits exactly two minutes. The AI builder generates a fully functional, multi-page website. It has a luxury aesthetic. It has the salon's actual address. It has a "Book Online" button. It has a testimonials section featuring real quotes from their actual customers. It looks like a $5,000 custom build from a boutique agency. It took her eight minutes and cost zero dollars. Then, she picks up the phone. She doesn't pitch. She doesn't ask for a meeting. *"Hey, I noticed you didn't have a website, so I built you one this morning. Are you near a computer? It takes 30 seconds to look at it."* The owner says sure. She shares her screen. The owner is staring at a beautiful, functional website with their own business name on it. They see their own customers' reviews. They see their own address. They don't have to imagine what the agency might build in six weeks. They are looking at the finished product right now. She says: *"I can transfer the domain to you and have this live by tomorrow morning. It's $2,000."* Done. She closes 5 to 6 of these a week. $10,000 to $12,000 in weekly revenue. The 6th deal last week came because the 5th owner showed the demo to his brother-in-law who owns a landscaping company. Real web developers are complaining on Reddit that the market is dead and clients won't pay for quality anymore. Agencies are spending thousands on ads to get a single lead. She is ignoring all of them. She figured out the one truth of the modern internet: the most expensive part of a service business isn't the service. It's the pitch. When you can build the finished product in 8 minutes for free, you don't need to pitch anymore. You just need to show it to them. The market is pricing web design like it still takes a team of four people six weeks to build. She is pricing it like it takes two minutes. The gap between those two realities is where she is making $12,000 a week. And the businesses she calls have no idea she's just the screen.
0:42

A 21 YEAR OLD COLLEGE STUDENT IS CLOSING $12,000 A WEEK IN WEB DESIGN CONTRACTS FROM HER BEDROOM. SHE HAS NEVER WRITTEN A LINE OF HTML. She does not know how to set up a domain. She does not have a portfolio. Her entire agency is one Google Maps tab and a Claude subscription. She runs a move that the rest of the cold-calling internet hasn't figured out yet. Most agencies spend hours building pitch decks, hunting down leads, and begging for 15-minute discovery calls. They show up to meetings with promises. She shows up with the answer already built. Every morning at 9 AM, she opens Google Maps. She searches "nail salon" or "barbershop." She filters for businesses with a 4.7 rating or higher, hundreds of reviews, but no website listed. There are millions of them. Local businesses that are drowning in foot traffic but completely invisible online. She clicks on one. "Natural Nails & Lashes." She highlights every piece of information on their Google profile — the address, the operating hours, the owner's name, and five of the best customer reviews. She copies it all and drops it into Claude. She adds one line: "Write a prompt for an AI website builder using this data. Make it a professional, aesthetic, luxury website. Include the reviews." Claude spits out a master prompt. She copies it, opens Webild io, and pastes it in. She waits exactly two minutes. The AI builder generates a fully functional, multi-page website. It has a luxury aesthetic. It has the salon's actual address. It has a "Book Online" button. It has a testimonials section featuring real quotes from their actual customers. It looks like a $5,000 custom build from a boutique agency. It took her eight minutes and cost zero dollars. Then, she picks up the phone. She doesn't pitch. She doesn't ask for a meeting. *"Hey, I noticed you didn't have a website, so I built you one this morning. Are you near a computer? It takes 30 seconds to look at it."* The owner says sure. She shares her screen. The owner is staring at a beautiful, functional website with their own business name on it. They see their own customers' reviews. They see their own address. They don't have to imagine what the agency might build in six weeks. They are looking at the finished product right now. She says: *"I can transfer the domain to you and have this live by tomorrow morning. It's $2,000."* Done. She closes 5 to 6 of these a week. $10,000 to $12,000 in weekly revenue. The 6th deal last week came because the 5th owner showed the demo to his brother-in-law who owns a landscaping company. Real web developers are complaining on Reddit that the market is dead and clients won't pay for quality anymore. Agencies are spending thousands on ads to get a single lead. She is ignoring all of them. She figured out the one truth of the modern internet: the most expensive part of a service business isn't the service. It's the pitch. When you can build the finished product in 8 minutes for free, you don't need to pitch anymore. You just need to show it to them. The market is pricing web design like it still takes a team of four people six weeks to build. She is pricing it like it takes two minutes. The gap between those two realities is where she is making $12,000 a week. And the businesses she calls have no idea she's just the screen.

ZER

86,926 views • 1 month ago

CEO of Nvidia said something that stopped me cold: "You may or may not lose a job to an AI, but you will absolutely lose a job to someone who uses AI" this 41 minutes is the most important talk on AI you'll watch this year so the question is not whether AI is coming for your job it's whether you're the one using it or the one being replaced by someone who does Nvidia already has hundreds of thousands of agents running inside the company right now agents are not the future, they are how the best teams work today I wrote a step by step guide on how to build your first AI agent with Claude Code you can find it in the article below
41:34

CEO of Nvidia said something that stopped me cold: "You may or may not lose a job to an AI, but you will absolutely lose a job to someone who uses AI" this 41 minutes is the most important talk on AI you'll watch this year so the question is not whether AI is coming for your job it's whether you're the one using it or the one being replaced by someone who does Nvidia already has hundreds of thousands of agents running inside the company right now agents are not the future, they are how the best teams work today I wrote a step by step guide on how to build your first AI agent with Claude Code you can find it in the article below

Anatoli Kopadze

14,627 views • 2 months ago

WTF, THIS CHINESE FOUNDER RUNS HIS $10,000+ STARTUP'S ENTIRE WORKFLOW THROUGH HERMES AGENT ON FOUR MACHINES SIMULTANEOUSLY A studio founder just broke down why Hermes is different from every other AI tool right now: → Long-term memory. Most LLMs forget everything after the chat ends. Hermes remembers your work habits and gets sharper the more you use it. → Real execution, not suggestions. This is the core difference from Claude. Claude tells you what to do – you still do it. Hermes takes the instruction and finishes the task itself. → Scheduled tasks that just work. No complicated setup. Set the plan once, it runs on its own. This is what actual "hands-off" looks like. He's not running this on one machine. He's got FOUR laptops running Hermes simultaneously – each one handling a different part of his workflow at the same time. This is what it looks like when one person operates like a full team. He's dropping a full workflow build tutorial next – built for founders and operators trying to lighten their workload. Bookmark this, you'll want to come back to it later.
0:51

WTF, THIS CHINESE FOUNDER RUNS HIS $10,000+ STARTUP'S ENTIRE WORKFLOW THROUGH HERMES AGENT ON FOUR MACHINES SIMULTANEOUSLY A studio founder just broke down why Hermes is different from every other AI tool right now: → Long-term memory. Most LLMs forget everything after the chat ends. Hermes remembers your work habits and gets sharper the more you use it. → Real execution, not suggestions. This is the core difference from Claude. Claude tells you what to do – you still do it. Hermes takes the instruction and finishes the task itself. → Scheduled tasks that just work. No complicated setup. Set the plan once, it runs on its own. This is what actual "hands-off" looks like. He's not running this on one machine. He's got FOUR laptops running Hermes simultaneously – each one handling a different part of his workflow at the same time. This is what it looks like when one person operates like a full team. He's dropping a full workflow build tutorial next – built for founders and operators trying to lighten their workload. Bookmark this, you'll want to come back to it later.

SCOTTY BEAM

11,654 views • 1 month ago

This girl says she makes up to $5k creating cartoons using AI She revealed her “secret” to earning on YouTube with AI, and it honestly looks kind of scary In the video, she breaks down step by step her workflow that turns AI into a personal production studio: > Finding a “goldmine”: She looks for viral videos in the kids’ niche > Copying the foundation: She opens the description of the most popular video and basically copies its transcript > Creating a script: She pastes that text into ChatGPT and asks it to generate a detailed prompt for a similar kids show > Generating animation: She goes to Picsart AI Playground (or any other AI tool), selects a video generation tool, pastes the prompt from ChatGPT, and gets a fully made colorful cartoon > Monetization: She uploads the video to her channel and starts getting views And I was thinking - this could easily be automated with AI agents that do all these steps on their own and even upload directly to YouTube I already explained how to build a system like that in the article below Go check it out, save it and read it
0:38

This girl says she makes up to $5k creating cartoons using AI She revealed her “secret” to earning on YouTube with AI, and it honestly looks kind of scary In the video, she breaks down step by step her workflow that turns AI into a personal production studio: > Finding a “goldmine”: She looks for viral videos in the kids’ niche > Copying the foundation: She opens the description of the most popular video and basically copies its transcript > Creating a script: She pastes that text into ChatGPT and asks it to generate a detailed prompt for a similar kids show > Generating animation: She goes to Picsart AI Playground (or any other AI tool), selects a video generation tool, pastes the prompt from ChatGPT, and gets a fully made colorful cartoon > Monetization: She uploads the video to her channel and starts getting views And I was thinking - this could easily be automated with AI agents that do all these steps on their own and even upload directly to YouTube I already explained how to build a system like that in the article below Go check it out, save it and read it

Bonsai 🌳

105,959 views • 1 month ago

Software Engineering Expectations for 2026 - The majority of your code should be written by AI now - Cursor/Codex/Claude Code/Gemini/etc - You should try all the tooling and switch between them, as each one gets an edge over the others depending on the release cycle. - You should be using AI to check the code that is written by AI - Have AI write tests - Have AI read logs - Have AI navigate your browser - I don't do this every time because sometimes it's simple enough to check it myself - You should still skim code changes - This can be a lighter skim on internal tools and a heavier read through on customer facing code - Use AI to help you define specs
4:12

Software Engineering Expectations for 2026 - The majority of your code should be written by AI now - Cursor/Codex/Claude Code/Gemini/etc - You should try all the tooling and switch between them, as each one gets an edge over the others depending on the release cycle. - You should be using AI to check the code that is written by AI - Have AI write tests - Have AI read logs - Have AI navigate your browser - I don't do this every time because sometimes it's simple enough to check it myself - You should still skim code changes - This can be a lighter skim on internal tools and a heavier read through on customer facing code - Use AI to help you define specs

Ben Awad

534,861 views • 7 months ago

Most PMs tried Claude Code for a day, didn't get instant magic, and quietly decided it wasn't for them. The PMs pulling ahead are 1500 hours in and still rebuilding their setup every single day. That's the entire gap. Not talent. Not technical background. Just whether you stayed past the awkward week where nothing works yet. Hannah runs product at Anthropic and has the highest documented Claude Code mileage of any PM I've talked to. Her advice for someone with two hours this weekend isn't "build a workflow." It's "find one task to automate so you free up six hours next week to learn." That reframe is the whole game. Most people treat AI learning as something they'll get to after the real work is done. Hannah treats freeing up time to learn AS the real work. Two hours in, six hours out. Next week you reinvest those six into deeper automations that free up fifteen. The compounding only starts if you survive the first week. And almost nobody does, because day-one Claude Code feels mediocre. Your context isn't loaded. Your skills aren't written. Your CLAUDE.md is empty. The tool is guessing about your role, your product, your standards, everything. The PMs at 1500 hours aren't smarter than the ones who quit on day two. They just didn't quit on day two. Every PM interview at a frontier AI company in 2026 is some version of "show me your setup." The honest answer for most people right now is "I tried it once." Build the hour. Then build the loop.
4:56

Most PMs tried Claude Code for a day, didn't get instant magic, and quietly decided it wasn't for them. The PMs pulling ahead are 1500 hours in and still rebuilding their setup every single day. That's the entire gap. Not talent. Not technical background. Just whether you stayed past the awkward week where nothing works yet. Hannah runs product at Anthropic and has the highest documented Claude Code mileage of any PM I've talked to. Her advice for someone with two hours this weekend isn't "build a workflow." It's "find one task to automate so you free up six hours next week to learn." That reframe is the whole game. Most people treat AI learning as something they'll get to after the real work is done. Hannah treats freeing up time to learn AS the real work. Two hours in, six hours out. Next week you reinvest those six into deeper automations that free up fifteen. The compounding only starts if you survive the first week. And almost nobody does, because day-one Claude Code feels mediocre. Your context isn't loaded. Your skills aren't written. Your CLAUDE.md is empty. The tool is guessing about your role, your product, your standards, everything. The PMs at 1500 hours aren't smarter than the ones who quit on day two. They just didn't quit on day two. Every PM interview at a frontier AI company in 2026 is some version of "show me your setup." The honest answer for most people right now is "I tried it once." Build the hour. Then build the loop.

Aakash Gupta

49,411 views • 4 months ago

Someone ran Claude Code on an e-ink notebook and the slowest screen in the world suddenly turned out to be the best home for an AI that already thinks one word at a time. This is the reMarkable Paper Pro, a paper tablet for notes with no browser and no social media and not a single app. He went into it over SSH and brought up Claude Code on Opus 4.8 on Claude Max and typed right into the terminal on the paper screen: "hello reddit, this is ssh terminal on rmpp". For years this screen got slammed for one thing. E-ink is too slow and it draws with a delay and it ghosts and it is no good for real work. But Claude itself puts out a thought one word at a time. And here is what came out of it: the very thing that killed the paper screen for normal software lined up perfectly with the pace of the AI. There is no more lag because there is nothing left to lag. And then come the things no monitor can give you. Your eyes do not get tired. You can watch Opus think on max effort for an hour and it feels like reading a book and not staring into a backlight. Nothing distracts you. Not a single notification and not a single tab and just a cursor and an agent that writes code while you simply watch the page. The charge lasts for days. E-ink barely touches the battery so Claude can grind on a task all night long and the tablet is still alive by morning. And it weighs as much as a notebook. The whole work setup now fits into a bag like a notepad with a stylus on top. Everything on the screen is for real: Claude Code v2.1.162 and bypass permissions on and Opus going off to think on max effort right on the e-ink. In my opinion this is the most unexpected home for an AI this year. Not a farm of graphics cards and not a wall of monitors but a quiet sheet of paper on a coffee table where the most powerful Claude writes code one word at a time like a pen.
0:52

Someone ran Claude Code on an e-ink notebook and the slowest screen in the world suddenly turned out to be the best home for an AI that already thinks one word at a time. This is the reMarkable Paper Pro, a paper tablet for notes with no browser and no social media and not a single app. He went into it over SSH and brought up Claude Code on Opus 4.8 on Claude Max and typed right into the terminal on the paper screen: "hello reddit, this is ssh terminal on rmpp". For years this screen got slammed for one thing. E-ink is too slow and it draws with a delay and it ghosts and it is no good for real work. But Claude itself puts out a thought one word at a time. And here is what came out of it: the very thing that killed the paper screen for normal software lined up perfectly with the pace of the AI. There is no more lag because there is nothing left to lag. And then come the things no monitor can give you. Your eyes do not get tired. You can watch Opus think on max effort for an hour and it feels like reading a book and not staring into a backlight. Nothing distracts you. Not a single notification and not a single tab and just a cursor and an agent that writes code while you simply watch the page. The charge lasts for days. E-ink barely touches the battery so Claude can grind on a task all night long and the tablet is still alive by morning. And it weighs as much as a notebook. The whole work setup now fits into a bag like a notepad with a stylus on top. Everything on the screen is for real: Claude Code v2.1.162 and bypass permissions on and Opus going off to think on max effort right on the e-ink. In my opinion this is the most unexpected home for an AI this year. Not a farm of graphics cards and not a wall of monitors but a quiet sheet of paper on a coffee table where the most powerful Claude writes code one word at a time like a pen.

Blaze

422,510 views • 1 month ago

I don't think most PMs realize the PRD is becoming obsolete. For the last decade, the PM's core artifact was a qualitative spec. Clear requirements, user stories, acceptance criteria. The engineering team interpreted it, built something close, and the PM spent two weeks reconciling what shipped with what they wrote. The best AI companies replaced that entire loop with evals. A set of inputs your product needs to handle. A task that generates outputs. A scoring function that produces a number between 0 and 1. No ambiguity. No interpretation gap. Ankur Goyal built the eval platform behind Vercel, Replit, Ramp, Notion, and Airtable. An $800M company. He walked through building an eval from zero on this episode and the score went from 0 to 0.75 in under 20 minutes. That's a PM shipping a measurable quality bar before a single line of product code exists. Here's the part that changes the PM role permanently. When the product passes the eval and users still hate it, the eval is wrong. That's on the PM. Evals make PM judgment quantifiable in a way PRDs never did. You can't hide behind "the spec was ambiguous." There's a number now. Six months ago, PM interviews asked "how do you use AI in your workflow." The next wave of interviews is going to ask you to write an eval. The PMs who can encode user intent as a scoring function are building the one skill that survives every model change, every framework swap, every agent rewrite. Write the eval.
4:31

I don't think most PMs realize the PRD is becoming obsolete. For the last decade, the PM's core artifact was a qualitative spec. Clear requirements, user stories, acceptance criteria. The engineering team interpreted it, built something close, and the PM spent two weeks reconciling what shipped with what they wrote. The best AI companies replaced that entire loop with evals. A set of inputs your product needs to handle. A task that generates outputs. A scoring function that produces a number between 0 and 1. No ambiguity. No interpretation gap. Ankur Goyal built the eval platform behind Vercel, Replit, Ramp, Notion, and Airtable. An $800M company. He walked through building an eval from zero on this episode and the score went from 0 to 0.75 in under 20 minutes. That's a PM shipping a measurable quality bar before a single line of product code exists. Here's the part that changes the PM role permanently. When the product passes the eval and users still hate it, the eval is wrong. That's on the PM. Evals make PM judgment quantifiable in a way PRDs never did. You can't hide behind "the spec was ambiguous." There's a number now. Six months ago, PM interviews asked "how do you use AI in your workflow." The next wave of interviews is going to ask you to write an eval. The PMs who can encode user intent as a scoring function are building the one skill that survives every model change, every framework swap, every agent rewrite. Write the eval.

Aakash Gupta

78,275 views • 4 months ago

I still don't think people understand what just happened with Claude Code. There is now one tool that takes you from a rough idea to fully designed, agency-tier, App Store-ready screens in minutes. One design system, every screen, real native code. Most builders hand design to Claude Code, get AI-default screens, and wonder why their app looks like every other vibe coded project. This is the 3-step workflow that fixes it: (full breakdown in the article)
0:37

I still don't think people understand what just happened with Claude Code. There is now one tool that takes you from a rough idea to fully designed, agency-tier, App Store-ready screens in minutes. One design system, every screen, real native code. Most builders hand design to Claude Code, get AI-default screens, and wonder why their app looks like every other vibe coded project. This is the 3-step workflow that fixes it: (full breakdown in the article)

Prajwal Tomar

146,206 views • 1 month ago

OK SO FINALLY I have a means to show you what I have been saying for a while.......Watch this clip, share it, so people understand what we are saying here!!! In this Clip, JLR© is having a discussion with Watching the World , and we get to see that front door lock!! Here is what I have been saying.....The Front door is a material called EXPANDED METAL, YOU CAN SEE THROUGH IT. The Door IS a Security Door, that you would have to cut through with two locks. A Lock that can be unlocked via a key on the handle, and a DEADbolt lock that would be locked on the inside of the door. This PREVENTS someone from being able to attack you when you OPEN the HOUSE door that is inside it, and behind this screen door. That door only opens when that deadbolt is unlocked from inside! ALso notice we see NO damage to the door or frame in this video!!
2:59

OK SO FINALLY I have a means to show you what I have been saying for a while.......Watch this clip, share it, so people understand what we are saying here!!! In this Clip, JLR© is having a discussion with Watching the World , and we get to see that front door lock!! Here is what I have been saying.....The Front door is a material called EXPANDED METAL, YOU CAN SEE THROUGH IT. The Door IS a Security Door, that you would have to cut through with two locks. A Lock that can be unlocked via a key on the handle, and a DEADbolt lock that would be locked on the inside of the door. This PREVENTS someone from being able to attack you when you OPEN the HOUSE door that is inside it, and behind this screen door. That door only opens when that deadbolt is unlocked from inside! ALso notice we see NO damage to the door or frame in this video!!

Capt KEVman!!!

46,092 views • 5 months ago

Demis Hassabis: "In the near future, one person who knows AI will outperform an entire startup team" I've watched hundreds of AI talks, this 60-minute Cambridge lecture is the one I wish I had seen a year ago Save this before everyone copies the playbook this is the Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry, CEO of Google DeepMind and the guy who made AI solve biology here's the part that won't leave my head: > the AI you're using today is the dumbest it will ever be > one person with AI agents will replace teams of 10, then 50, then 200 > the winners won't be the smartest. they'll be the ones who built their AI team first > you don't need to hire people anymore. you need to build agents that work together > hiring is about to become optional for most startups right now most people open Claude, ask a question, read the answer, close the tab they think they're using AI, but they're using maybe 5% of it I turned his lecture into a step-by-step guide to build your first app using Claude. Completely FREE full guide in the post below.
1:01:06

Demis Hassabis: "In the near future, one person who knows AI will outperform an entire startup team" I've watched hundreds of AI talks, this 60-minute Cambridge lecture is the one I wish I had seen a year ago Save this before everyone copies the playbook this is the Nobel Prize winner in Chemistry, CEO of Google DeepMind and the guy who made AI solve biology here's the part that won't leave my head: > the AI you're using today is the dumbest it will ever be > one person with AI agents will replace teams of 10, then 50, then 200 > the winners won't be the smartest. they'll be the ones who built their AI team first > you don't need to hire people anymore. you need to build agents that work together > hiring is about to become optional for most startups right now most people open Claude, ask a question, read the answer, close the tab they think they're using AI, but they're using maybe 5% of it I turned his lecture into a step-by-step guide to build your first app using Claude. Completely FREE full guide in the post below.

Khairallah AL-Awady

42,882 views • 3 months ago