Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Mumbai did not buy the CJP script. Dead names, duplicate names, people who shifted years ago. Cleaning that is not vote chori. Freezing the January 2025 list so those ghosts stay eligible is. Police denied Shivaji Park. The 2013 High Court order is public, the ground is for sport,...

AskAnshul's profile picture

Anshul Saxena

1,291,048 subscribers

50,040 просмотров • 3 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

Новости и политикаОбразование
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

VIDEO | Mumbai: "We won't stop until CEC Gyanesh Kumar resigns. He did not seek our permission before deleting voters, so why is the government expecting us to take permission to hold a protest?" says CJP co-convenor Ashutosh Ranka on the protest against the CEC at Shivaji Park. Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke on Wednesday sought the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and warned of protests across the country, followed by a stir at Jantar Mantar in Delhi from the end of October if the demand is not met. Speaking at an interaction at the Mumbai Press Club, Dipke said the CJP will hold a protest at Shivaji Park in Dadar on October 2 to press for the CEC's resignation.
1:33

VIDEO | Mumbai: "We won't stop until CEC Gyanesh Kumar resigns. He did not seek our permission before deleting voters, so why is the government expecting us to take permission to hold a protest?" says CJP co-convenor Ashutosh Ranka on the protest against the CEC at Shivaji Park. Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) founder Abhijeet Dipke on Wednesday sought the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar and warned of protests across the country, followed by a stir at Jantar Mantar in Delhi from the end of October if the demand is not met. Speaking at an interaction at the Mumbai Press Club, Dipke said the CJP will hold a protest at Shivaji Park in Dadar on October 2 to press for the CEC's resignation.

Press Trust of India

94,623 просмотров • 4 дней назад

Tucker Carlson: They knew 9/11 was coming and got RICH... and the FBI still hides their names In the days before the attack, there was a massive spike in options trading. People betting against the exact two airlines used in the hijackings. People betting defense contractor stocks would explode. That is not a coincidence. That is foreknowledge. Were those traders from al-Qaeda? The FBI said no. How do they know? Because they found the identities of the people who placed the bets. More than 3,000 Americans murdered. Individuals who knew it was coming tried to cash in. The FBI has their names. It’s in the 9/11 report. That report is 25 years old this week. We still don’t know who they were. No names. No charges. No explanation. What conceivable reason does a government have to hide the people who bet on the deadliest attack in American history? Until they answer that, the official story is incomplete. The crime isn’t only what happened on 9/11. The crime is that a separate class got to profit from it… and never had to face the same rules as everyone else.
4:25

Tucker Carlson: They knew 9/11 was coming and got RICH... and the FBI still hides their names In the days before the attack, there was a massive spike in options trading. People betting against the exact two airlines used in the hijackings. People betting defense contractor stocks would explode. That is not a coincidence. That is foreknowledge. Were those traders from al-Qaeda? The FBI said no. How do they know? Because they found the identities of the people who placed the bets. More than 3,000 Americans murdered. Individuals who knew it was coming tried to cash in. The FBI has their names. It’s in the 9/11 report. That report is 25 years old this week. We still don’t know who they were. No names. No charges. No explanation. What conceivable reason does a government have to hide the people who bet on the deadliest attack in American history? Until they answer that, the official story is incomplete. The crime isn’t only what happened on 9/11. The crime is that a separate class got to profit from it… and never had to face the same rules as everyone else.

Defiant Ghost

14,531 просмотров • 23 дней назад

#WATCH | Mumbai | Heavy police deployment at Shivaji Park, in view of CJP call for a protest against the Election Commission; A few locals from the area object to the park being used as a protest site, citing inconvenience to locals here A local says, "We come here for walks in this park, but many protests have been happening here recently. Who is responsible for the troubles being caused to the common people? It is wrong. If a protest is for the right cause, then it's fine. The govt has provided Azad Maidan for protests." Another local says, "We stay in this area. Today, there is a lot of police presence, and a stage has been set up. The local associations from here have written to Shivaji Park Police Station that no protests should be allowed here...There are schools and hospitals here, which cause inconvenience. We are only demanding that these people (CJP) should got to Azad Maidan to protest."
5:09

#WATCH | Mumbai | Heavy police deployment at Shivaji Park, in view of CJP call for a protest against the Election Commission; A few locals from the area object to the park being used as a protest site, citing inconvenience to locals here A local says, "We come here for walks in this park, but many protests have been happening here recently. Who is responsible for the troubles being caused to the common people? It is wrong. If a protest is for the right cause, then it's fine. The govt has provided Azad Maidan for protests." Another local says, "We stay in this area. Today, there is a lot of police presence, and a stage has been set up. The local associations from here have written to Shivaji Park Police Station that no protests should be allowed here...There are schools and hospitals here, which cause inconvenience. We are only demanding that these people (CJP) should got to Azad Maidan to protest."

ANI

296,895 просмотров • 3 дней назад

Exactly. They stopped for Approx. 2-3 Minutes and That Is Being Conservative. I Want To Know Why And What They Were Doing? The drive from the courtyard to Timpanogos Regional Hospital is 6-8 minutes with no traffic. The SUV left UVU at 12:24 and was still in route at 12:35 when the Ambulance passed them. A caller on the new 911 tape said the black SUV left the lot and then stopped once it was out of sight of the crowd. A man with a neck wound does not get a voluntary pause. Every second of that stop is time he is not in a trauma bay. What they were doing is not in the after-action report, the probable-cause record, or any public statement from the security team. There is no released camera of the stop. There is no radio call explaining it. The public has the departure, the hospital arrival, and a hole in the middle. A stop that long, out of sight, with no medical reason on the record, leaves many unanswered questions and no official answer. Were they getting rid of something before they got to the hospital? Discarding evidence is a theory. It is not a fact. The fact is that the people in that SUV never mentioned the stop and have never said why they stopped. That is the question that should be put to Brian Harpole and everyone else who was in the vehicle. Why did you stop, and what were you doing for those two to three minutes.
3:42

Exactly. They stopped for Approx. 2-3 Minutes and That Is Being Conservative. I Want To Know Why And What They Were Doing? The drive from the courtyard to Timpanogos Regional Hospital is 6-8 minutes with no traffic. The SUV left UVU at 12:24 and was still in route at 12:35 when the Ambulance passed them. A caller on the new 911 tape said the black SUV left the lot and then stopped once it was out of sight of the crowd. A man with a neck wound does not get a voluntary pause. Every second of that stop is time he is not in a trauma bay. What they were doing is not in the after-action report, the probable-cause record, or any public statement from the security team. There is no released camera of the stop. There is no radio call explaining it. The public has the departure, the hospital arrival, and a hole in the middle. A stop that long, out of sight, with no medical reason on the record, leaves many unanswered questions and no official answer. Were they getting rid of something before they got to the hospital? Discarding evidence is a theory. It is not a fact. The fact is that the people in that SUV never mentioned the stop and have never said why they stopped. That is the question that should be put to Brian Harpole and everyone else who was in the vehicle. Why did you stop, and what were you doing for those two to three minutes.

Project Constitution

58,342 просмотров • 2 дней назад

I’m seeing a lot of people claim that Elections Canada “encouraged” people to bring pens. That no one was being told to vote in pencil only. That no one was denied the freedom to vote in pen. Clearly that’s not true. If this happened to one person, it happened to others as well. This is but one of a long list of discrepancies in this election. Where is the outcry and demands for electoral integrity from the conservatives?!
0:23

I’m seeing a lot of people claim that Elections Canada “encouraged” people to bring pens. That no one was being told to vote in pencil only. That no one was denied the freedom to vote in pen. Clearly that’s not true. If this happened to one person, it happened to others as well. This is but one of a long list of discrepancies in this election. Where is the outcry and demands for electoral integrity from the conservatives?!

𝔽𝕣𝕠𝕫𝕖𝕟𝔹𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕖 🇨🇦

167,687 просмотров • 1 год назад

Abhijeet Dipke says he will hold a "Jail Bharo Andolan" on October 2 because the CJP was denied permission to protest at Shivaji Park, Mumbai. But he conveniently won’t mention that Mumbai Police denied permission because his application didn’t even include the required BMC permission document. Police also told him to seek permission for another location if he wants to hold the protest. This is exactly why I call Dipke a fraud. He deliberately creates chaos, ignores the actual facts and then plays the victim, just like he did in Delhi.
0:29

Abhijeet Dipke says he will hold a "Jail Bharo Andolan" on October 2 because the CJP was denied permission to protest at Shivaji Park, Mumbai. But he conveniently won’t mention that Mumbai Police denied permission because his application didn’t even include the required BMC permission document. Police also told him to seek permission for another location if he wants to hold the protest. This is exactly why I call Dipke a fraud. He deliberately creates chaos, ignores the actual facts and then plays the victim, just like he did in Delhi.

Amit Kumar Sindhi

80,820 просмотров • 8 дней назад

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.
2:06

Lolita is a story about a man who walked into a house that was already a little lonely, and a girl who had no say in who got a key. Charlotte wants to be chosen. That part is human. She is a widow, she is proud, she is hungry for a life that is not only bills and a daughter who is growing away from her. Humbert sees that hunger and uses it. He does not fall into the family. He studies it. The mother is the door. The child is the room. Dolores is not the author of what happens to her. That is the whole point, and it is the part adaptations keep almost dropping. She is a kid in a small world …camps, cars, motels, a mother who wants a wedding more than she wants to look again at the man she let in. When Charlotte is gone, there is no adult left whose job is her. There is only him, and the road, and the lie that this is a romance because he is the one talking. Why did the adult who was meant to protect the child,preyed on her? He was supposed to be a wall not an opening. In the book,the girl was only 12yrs old.

LOLO

3,193,418 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

The world has a very specific kind of dead body it knows how to mourn. These are not it. A Christian community in North Africa is putting its people into the ground after another Islamist massacre, and most of the West will never learn their names. There will be no campus encampment, no urgent panel, no celebrity caption. The same institutions that can produce a slogan in an hour when the victims fit the script go quiet when the killers are men who actually say they are doing it for their “god”. This is not a tragedy that fell out of the sky. It is a method. Churches, villages, families, then a trench, then a burial, then silence until the next one. If your moral system only activates when Israel is in the frame, it is not a moral system. It is a filter. Watch it. Then ask why this footage never travels.
0:23

The world has a very specific kind of dead body it knows how to mourn. These are not it. A Christian community in North Africa is putting its people into the ground after another Islamist massacre, and most of the West will never learn their names. There will be no campus encampment, no urgent panel, no celebrity caption. The same institutions that can produce a slogan in an hour when the victims fit the script go quiet when the killers are men who actually say they are doing it for their “god”. This is not a tragedy that fell out of the sky. It is a method. Churches, villages, families, then a trench, then a burial, then silence until the next one. If your moral system only activates when Israel is in the frame, it is not a moral system. It is a filter. Watch it. Then ask why this footage never travels.

Mor Edge Insight

364,939 просмотров • 16 дней назад

#WATCH | Mumbai | A resident of Shivaji Park and advocate Siddhi Deolekar says, "I have been living right opposite Shivaji Park for the last 10 years, and I have lodged a complaint against the CJP founders for conducting an illegal protest today. They were not granted permission, and this is the letter issued by the Shivaji Park Police Station to Ajinkya Shinde. The letter clearly states why permission was not granted. It states that, as per the Bombay High Court order dated January 4, 2013, they would not be allowed to hold a protest here. Despite that order of the Bombay High Court, they decided to conduct the protest on the roads today. Well, I am not against protests. Everyone has the right to protest, but there are designated places for protests. So why come onto the road and protest like this? You can go to Azad Maidan or Jantar Mantar, but why block the roads and traffic and sit outside other people’s houses to protest? What kind of protest is this? If you want the Election Commissioner to resign, then go and protest at Jantar Mantar, but not opposite our houses... I really want to thank the Mumbai Police. They assured us—not just me, but many other citizens like me who went and complained. We simply needed assistance and wanted to feel secure. There were many people like me who approached the police, and we were assisted very well...I hope appropriate action will be taken against them..." (02.10)
2:31

#WATCH | Mumbai | A resident of Shivaji Park and advocate Siddhi Deolekar says, "I have been living right opposite Shivaji Park for the last 10 years, and I have lodged a complaint against the CJP founders for conducting an illegal protest today. They were not granted permission, and this is the letter issued by the Shivaji Park Police Station to Ajinkya Shinde. The letter clearly states why permission was not granted. It states that, as per the Bombay High Court order dated January 4, 2013, they would not be allowed to hold a protest here. Despite that order of the Bombay High Court, they decided to conduct the protest on the roads today. Well, I am not against protests. Everyone has the right to protest, but there are designated places for protests. So why come onto the road and protest like this? You can go to Azad Maidan or Jantar Mantar, but why block the roads and traffic and sit outside other people’s houses to protest? What kind of protest is this? If you want the Election Commissioner to resign, then go and protest at Jantar Mantar, but not opposite our houses... I really want to thank the Mumbai Police. They assured us—not just me, but many other citizens like me who went and complained. We simply needed assistance and wanted to feel secure. There were many people like me who approached the police, and we were assisted very well...I hope appropriate action will be taken against them..." (02.10)

ANI

376,057 просмотров • 2 дней назад

On February 19th Robert Cosgrove stated in open Court, that although the CW had a 3 day window to appeal Judge Crup's order to return Karen Read's 2 iPhones, he did not do so, instead filing to Stay the order pending the MA Supreme Judicial Courts ruling in the Diaz. July 27, 2025 appeals court heard arguments and AGREED that a defendant's phone was held unsearched for 123 days before a search warrant was sought and executed. Since the appeals court agreed, that is the standing law. At the SJC, the CW is claiming once lawfully seized, the owners possessory right (control over the physical item) is altered until trial anyway. Therefore, they claim a delay in getting a warrant does not cause extra harm. But that is not currently the law. This court is in violation by allowing Cosgrove to hold the phones awaiting POTENTIAL overturn of current law by the SJC. This should be sent to SJC for potential review as directly violating the Appeals Court precedent. And since no appeal was in fact filed, the phones should be returned.
0:24

On February 19th Robert Cosgrove stated in open Court, that although the CW had a 3 day window to appeal Judge Crup's order to return Karen Read's 2 iPhones, he did not do so, instead filing to Stay the order pending the MA Supreme Judicial Courts ruling in the Diaz. July 27, 2025 appeals court heard arguments and AGREED that a defendant's phone was held unsearched for 123 days before a search warrant was sought and executed. Since the appeals court agreed, that is the standing law. At the SJC, the CW is claiming once lawfully seized, the owners possessory right (control over the physical item) is altered until trial anyway. Therefore, they claim a delay in getting a warrant does not cause extra harm. But that is not currently the law. This court is in violation by allowing Cosgrove to hold the phones awaiting POTENTIAL overturn of current law by the SJC. This should be sent to SJC for potential review as directly violating the Appeals Court precedent. And since no appeal was in fact filed, the phones should be returned.

Adam Scott

10,547 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

They signed it. Amendment Bill No. 3 is law now, and the thing we said would happen has happened, in the quiet, procedural way these things always happen. No drama. A signature. The machinery moved exactly as it was built to move. Understand what was actually done here. This was a conversion of a term limit from a constitutional guarantee into a negotiable inconvenience. Section 328 was meant to be the lock on the door. They have shown us the lock was only ever as strong as the willingness of the people holding the keys to respect it. There will be those who tell you this is legal. They will be technically correct and entirely beside the point. Legality is not the same as legitimacy. A process can follow every step and still hollow out the thing it claims to protect. The Constitution was amended by the exact people the Constitution was written to restrain. That is not the rule of law. That is the rule of whoever holds the pen. I want to be careful about despair, because despair is the goal. A population that believes nothing can change is a population that has agreed to be governed without consent. So let me say the useful thing instead of the bitter one. Constitutions are not defended in the moment they are broken. They are defended in the long years afterward, by people who refuse to accept that the breaking was normal. The record matters. Who voted. Who signed. Who stayed silent. Who said, plainly and for the record, that this was wrong. History is not written by the people who hold the pen today. It is written by the people who kept count. Keep count.
2:16

They signed it. Amendment Bill No. 3 is law now, and the thing we said would happen has happened, in the quiet, procedural way these things always happen. No drama. A signature. The machinery moved exactly as it was built to move. Understand what was actually done here. This was a conversion of a term limit from a constitutional guarantee into a negotiable inconvenience. Section 328 was meant to be the lock on the door. They have shown us the lock was only ever as strong as the willingness of the people holding the keys to respect it. There will be those who tell you this is legal. They will be technically correct and entirely beside the point. Legality is not the same as legitimacy. A process can follow every step and still hollow out the thing it claims to protect. The Constitution was amended by the exact people the Constitution was written to restrain. That is not the rule of law. That is the rule of whoever holds the pen. I want to be careful about despair, because despair is the goal. A population that believes nothing can change is a population that has agreed to be governed without consent. So let me say the useful thing instead of the bitter one. Constitutions are not defended in the moment they are broken. They are defended in the long years afterward, by people who refuse to accept that the breaking was normal. The record matters. Who voted. Who signed. Who stayed silent. Who said, plainly and for the record, that this was wrong. History is not written by the people who hold the pen today. It is written by the people who kept count. Keep count.

Tawonga Kurewa

10,243 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

🚨Fabrizio Romano on Enzo 🗣️ "Enzo Fernández is a name on Real Madrid’s shortlist. I can guarantee this. He is one of the names, but not the only one. Real Madrid have had four or five midfielders under consideration since last week. It was last Tuesday when José Mourinho arrived in Madrid, was announced as the new Real Madrid manager and presented his ideas for several positions. This included Bernardo Silva and the other signings Real Madrid completed, including Cucurella. Enzo Fernández is definitely one of the names mentioned, with the player open to a move to Real Madrid. There is no doubt about that. However, despite reports suggesting that this could be a very fast deal, the understanding at the moment is that nothing official is happening. This is not currently a Cucurella situation. The Cucurella deal happened very quickly it was agreed and completed out of nowhere. Enzo Fernández is simply one of the names under consideration at Real Madrid, and as I said, he is not the only one. For example, Matheus Fernandes is on Manchester United’s list and has been in contact with United, but he is also a player recommended by Mourinho to Real Madrid. So, it is not only Enzo Fernández."
1:41

🚨Fabrizio Romano on Enzo 🗣️ "Enzo Fernández is a name on Real Madrid’s shortlist. I can guarantee this. He is one of the names, but not the only one. Real Madrid have had four or five midfielders under consideration since last week. It was last Tuesday when José Mourinho arrived in Madrid, was announced as the new Real Madrid manager and presented his ideas for several positions. This included Bernardo Silva and the other signings Real Madrid completed, including Cucurella. Enzo Fernández is definitely one of the names mentioned, with the player open to a move to Real Madrid. There is no doubt about that. However, despite reports suggesting that this could be a very fast deal, the understanding at the moment is that nothing official is happening. This is not currently a Cucurella situation. The Cucurella deal happened very quickly it was agreed and completed out of nowhere. Enzo Fernández is simply one of the names under consideration at Real Madrid, and as I said, he is not the only one. For example, Matheus Fernandes is on Manchester United’s list and has been in contact with United, but he is also a player recommended by Mourinho to Real Madrid. So, it is not only Enzo Fernández."

SHAYEE 𒀭

18,533 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

you numbered the steps so it could not get lost it does not get lost that list was written for a model that wandered, and this one plans better than the list does, so every number you added is a place where it is no longer allowed, to be smarter than you state the goal, the constraints, and how you will know it worked keep the numbers only where exactly one sequence is safe, which is deletes, auth and compliance the procedure felt like rigour it is a cage built to the dimensions of a model that is not in the room
1:21

you numbered the steps so it could not get lost it does not get lost that list was written for a model that wandered, and this one plans better than the list does, so every number you added is a place where it is no longer allowed, to be smarter than you state the goal, the constraints, and how you will know it worked keep the numbers only where exactly one sequence is safe, which is deletes, auth and compliance the procedure felt like rigour it is a cage built to the dimensions of a model that is not in the room

Lagosaur

14,857 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Sambhal stone pelting incident, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi says "The mosque in Sambhal is not 50-100 years old, it is more than 250-300 years old and the court passed an ex parte order without listening to the people of the mosque which is wrong... When the second survey was done no information was given...The video of the survey which people are claiming is in the public domain shows provocative slogans were raised by the people who came for the survey. Violence took place, three Muslims were shot dead. We condemn it. This is not firing but murder...The officers involved should be suspended and a sitting high court should inquire that it is totally wrong, atrocities are happening there..."
4:34

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Sambhal stone pelting incident, AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi says "The mosque in Sambhal is not 50-100 years old, it is more than 250-300 years old and the court passed an ex parte order without listening to the people of the mosque which is wrong... When the second survey was done no information was given...The video of the survey which people are claiming is in the public domain shows provocative slogans were raised by the people who came for the survey. Violence took place, three Muslims were shot dead. We condemn it. This is not firing but murder...The officers involved should be suspended and a sitting high court should inquire that it is totally wrong, atrocities are happening there..."

ANI

146,493 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨 “THIS WAS A CHILDREN’S HANUKKAH PARTY — AND THEY CAME TO KILL” Listen carefully to what the witness says. This wasn’t a protest. It wasn’t a clash. It wasn’t chaos. It was a children’s event. Face painting. Bubbles. Food stalls. Kids under one year old. Families. Elderly. Ordinary people celebrating Hanukkah — a holiday for children. Then the shooting started. Only when bodies hit the ground did people realise it wasn’t a joke. Only when they saw the dead did they understand what was happening. The witness draws the comparison himself: “This is like the Nova Festival. Exactly the same.” Young people gathered to celebrate life — and terrorists arrived to deliver death. He makes a distinction that matters: “We value life. They value death.” That is not rhetoric. It is a worldview divide. And the warning is stark: If societies excuse those who glorify death, if incitement is tolerated, if terror is rationalised as politics — then the violence does not stay overseas. It arrives. Bondi was not random. It was not inevitable. It was the result of lines blurred for too long. This was not just an attack on a community. It was a test of whether the West still understands the difference between life and death. Australia has just learned the cost of forgetting.
2:02

🚨 “THIS WAS A CHILDREN’S HANUKKAH PARTY — AND THEY CAME TO KILL” Listen carefully to what the witness says. This wasn’t a protest. It wasn’t a clash. It wasn’t chaos. It was a children’s event. Face painting. Bubbles. Food stalls. Kids under one year old. Families. Elderly. Ordinary people celebrating Hanukkah — a holiday for children. Then the shooting started. Only when bodies hit the ground did people realise it wasn’t a joke. Only when they saw the dead did they understand what was happening. The witness draws the comparison himself: “This is like the Nova Festival. Exactly the same.” Young people gathered to celebrate life — and terrorists arrived to deliver death. He makes a distinction that matters: “We value life. They value death.” That is not rhetoric. It is a worldview divide. And the warning is stark: If societies excuse those who glorify death, if incitement is tolerated, if terror is rationalised as politics — then the violence does not stay overseas. It arrives. Bondi was not random. It was not inevitable. It was the result of lines blurred for too long. This was not just an attack on a community. It was a test of whether the West still understands the difference between life and death. Australia has just learned the cost of forgetting.

Jim Ferguson

28,518 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Jeff Bezos looked at a government waiting room and priced it at a hundred billion dollars. Bezos: “This is a $100 billion business, by the way. This is huge business.” That number is not ambition. It is a measurement. A company that size does not create a hundred billion dollars of new value here. It recovers a hundred billion that is already being destroyed, on schedule, in public, by a process everyone has agreed to call normal. The size of the opportunity is the size of the wound. Bezos: “They almost always say yes, they just make you wait a long time.” So the verdict was never in question. Only the delivery date. Which means the months bought nothing. They were storage. Your project sat in a room while the word yes waited its turn to be said. Nobody in there was deciding. Someone was scheduling. And the room bills by the day. Suarez: “The daily carrying cost, one day of interest, 200 to $400,000 per day.” Now find the recipient. There isn’t one. No school funded, no inspector paid, no safety review performed. A tax at least moves money into someone’s hands. This deletes it at four hundred thousand a day, and every dollar was real before the queue touched it. Bezos: “And that doesn’t count the frustration.” Count it anyway. It lands on a body long before it lands on a spreadsheet. Suarez: “Which is infinite. I have some white hairs as a result of this stuff.” That is the invoice. The money has a rate. The rest gets charged to the man, and he pays it whether the answer comes back yes or no. No one has ever been refunded a year. Every other cost in this economy can be hedged, insured, refinanced, or written off. Waiting is the only one that is final. A man will forgive being told no. He will never get back the time he spent standing there waiting to be told yes. We built a civilization that can move a decision at the speed of light and still schedule it at the speed of a man’s hair turning white. Bezos: “It should give you a yes or a no in 10 seconds. And if the answer is no, it should tell you the 6 things you have to change to get a yes.” For four thousand years the wait was honest. Someone had to hold the entire code in one head and walk it line by line against your drawings. Reading was slow because reading was human. That stopped being true in less time than it takes to approve one building. Bezos: “Maybe with AI it can just read all the plans. And it knows all the codes. Spit it out.” The constraint is gone. The wait stayed. Anything still moving at the old speed after the cost of thinking collapsed is not slow. It is choosing. The queue never protected you from a bad building. It protected a signature from a bad outcome. Nobody gets fired for the wait. They get fired for the answer. An institution has no lifespan, so time costs it nothing. You have one, so time is the only thing it can take. Every queue is a trade between something that dies and something that doesn’t, and only one side is ever charged. That trade held for the whole of recorded history because the mortal side had no leverage. It does now. Somebody is going to build this. A hundred billion does not sit in a waiting room forever. And the day it exists, the wait stops being a fact of the world and becomes a decision with a name attached. The hundred billion was never the prize. It is the receipt for how long we agreed to stand there. We are the first people alive who get to stop signing it.
1:55

Jeff Bezos looked at a government waiting room and priced it at a hundred billion dollars. Bezos: “This is a $100 billion business, by the way. This is huge business.” That number is not ambition. It is a measurement. A company that size does not create a hundred billion dollars of new value here. It recovers a hundred billion that is already being destroyed, on schedule, in public, by a process everyone has agreed to call normal. The size of the opportunity is the size of the wound. Bezos: “They almost always say yes, they just make you wait a long time.” So the verdict was never in question. Only the delivery date. Which means the months bought nothing. They were storage. Your project sat in a room while the word yes waited its turn to be said. Nobody in there was deciding. Someone was scheduling. And the room bills by the day. Suarez: “The daily carrying cost, one day of interest, 200 to $400,000 per day.” Now find the recipient. There isn’t one. No school funded, no inspector paid, no safety review performed. A tax at least moves money into someone’s hands. This deletes it at four hundred thousand a day, and every dollar was real before the queue touched it. Bezos: “And that doesn’t count the frustration.” Count it anyway. It lands on a body long before it lands on a spreadsheet. Suarez: “Which is infinite. I have some white hairs as a result of this stuff.” That is the invoice. The money has a rate. The rest gets charged to the man, and he pays it whether the answer comes back yes or no. No one has ever been refunded a year. Every other cost in this economy can be hedged, insured, refinanced, or written off. Waiting is the only one that is final. A man will forgive being told no. He will never get back the time he spent standing there waiting to be told yes. We built a civilization that can move a decision at the speed of light and still schedule it at the speed of a man’s hair turning white. Bezos: “It should give you a yes or a no in 10 seconds. And if the answer is no, it should tell you the 6 things you have to change to get a yes.” For four thousand years the wait was honest. Someone had to hold the entire code in one head and walk it line by line against your drawings. Reading was slow because reading was human. That stopped being true in less time than it takes to approve one building. Bezos: “Maybe with AI it can just read all the plans. And it knows all the codes. Spit it out.” The constraint is gone. The wait stayed. Anything still moving at the old speed after the cost of thinking collapsed is not slow. It is choosing. The queue never protected you from a bad building. It protected a signature from a bad outcome. Nobody gets fired for the wait. They get fired for the answer. An institution has no lifespan, so time costs it nothing. You have one, so time is the only thing it can take. Every queue is a trade between something that dies and something that doesn’t, and only one side is ever charged. That trade held for the whole of recorded history because the mortal side had no leverage. It does now. Somebody is going to build this. A hundred billion does not sit in a waiting room forever. And the day it exists, the wait stops being a fact of the world and becomes a decision with a name attached. The hundred billion was never the prize. It is the receipt for how long we agreed to stand there. We are the first people alive who get to stop signing it.

Dustin

17,133 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

In the second matter before the Constitutional Court, filed by former opposition Member of Parliament Prince Dubeko Sibanda, the argument was that Parliament could not lawfully debate Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 because the bill itself is unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court ruled that the application was not yet ripe for determination, meaning that the parliamentary process must first run its course before the applicant can return to court to challenge the outcome. Once again, many lawyers have described the Court’s approach as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court is declining to engage with the substantive constitutional questions now and is instead postponing their determination. However, the issues will not disappear. Even if the matter proceeds through the High Court first, it is almost inevitable that it will eventually return to the Constitutional Court on appeal for a final determination on the merits. In short, the Constitutional Court has not resolved the constitutional questions surrounding CAB 3; it has merely deferred them.
1:48

In the second matter before the Constitutional Court, filed by former opposition Member of Parliament Prince Dubeko Sibanda, the argument was that Parliament could not lawfully debate Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 because the bill itself is unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court ruled that the application was not yet ripe for determination, meaning that the parliamentary process must first run its course before the applicant can return to court to challenge the outcome. Once again, many lawyers have described the Court’s approach as an example of constitutional avoidance. In their view, the Court is declining to engage with the substantive constitutional questions now and is instead postponing their determination. However, the issues will not disappear. Even if the matter proceeds through the High Court first, it is almost inevitable that it will eventually return to the Constitutional Court on appeal for a final determination on the merits. In short, the Constitutional Court has not resolved the constitutional questions surrounding CAB 3; it has merely deferred them.

Hopewell Chin’ono

39,069 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!!! Yesterday, our colleague and DD Geopolitics correspondent Chris was told that the US government has placed him on the FBI's no-fly list while trying to board a flight in Beijing. He is an American citizen. He received no warning, no charge, and no reason. He found out only when the airline refused to issue his boarding pass after eight hours of waiting, stranding him abroad. As an American, he is now barred from flying to, from, or even over his own country. His "offense" is journalism. Chris was traveling to cover Iran's national team at the World Cup. In recent months he reported on the ground from Minab in southern Iran and from the site of the Starobelsk strike in the Donbass, where a dormitory full of teenagers was killed. His work documents the human cost of the wars Washington funds and fights: the children who never make the press releases. For that, an American citizen has been placed on a terrorism watchlist with no due process and no explanation. This is not a small thing. The no-fly list operates with almost no transparency, Americans are routinely listed without ever being told why, and the redress process is a black box that a federal court has already found violates constitutional due process. It is one of the most powerful quiet censorship tools the government holds, and it is now pointed at a journalist for reporting things they would rather no one see. DD Geopolitics will not be silenced. We are pursuing every legal avenue available to Chris, and we will not let this be buried. If they can do this to him with no warrant, no charge, and not one word of explanation, they can do it to any American who shows the world something it isn't supposed to see.
1:35

WE WILL NOT BE SILENCED!!!! Yesterday, our colleague and DD Geopolitics correspondent Chris was told that the US government has placed him on the FBI's no-fly list while trying to board a flight in Beijing. He is an American citizen. He received no warning, no charge, and no reason. He found out only when the airline refused to issue his boarding pass after eight hours of waiting, stranding him abroad. As an American, he is now barred from flying to, from, or even over his own country. His "offense" is journalism. Chris was traveling to cover Iran's national team at the World Cup. In recent months he reported on the ground from Minab in southern Iran and from the site of the Starobelsk strike in the Donbass, where a dormitory full of teenagers was killed. His work documents the human cost of the wars Washington funds and fights: the children who never make the press releases. For that, an American citizen has been placed on a terrorism watchlist with no due process and no explanation. This is not a small thing. The no-fly list operates with almost no transparency, Americans are routinely listed without ever being told why, and the redress process is a black box that a federal court has already found violates constitutional due process. It is one of the most powerful quiet censorship tools the government holds, and it is now pointed at a journalist for reporting things they would rather no one see. DD Geopolitics will not be silenced. We are pursuing every legal avenue available to Chris, and we will not let this be buried. If they can do this to him with no warrant, no charge, and not one word of explanation, they can do it to any American who shows the world something it isn't supposed to see.

DD Geopolitics

84,433 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon's Grok Bot runs an entire trading desk for $300 a month. The person who does that job at Goldman starts at $200,000. Mine took $1,000 to $3,900 on day one, out of a wallet anyone can open and read. Most of the build is not about making it trade. It is about stopping it. Every agent's job description ends with a list of what it may never do without asking me first. One of the six is not allowed to trade at all. Its entire job is killing what the other five found, and its no beats every score on the desk. The one that makes the final call never touches the market either. You could have this running by Friday. Most people reading this will not, and in a few months they will be paying somebody who did. The whole build is in the post below ↓ Save it while it still sounds strange. Give it a quarter and this is just how a retail account works.
0:45

Elon's Grok Bot runs an entire trading desk for $300 a month. The person who does that job at Goldman starts at $200,000. Mine took $1,000 to $3,900 on day one, out of a wallet anyone can open and read. Most of the build is not about making it trade. It is about stopping it. Every agent's job description ends with a list of what it may never do without asking me first. One of the six is not allowed to trade at all. Its entire job is killing what the other five found, and its no beats every score on the desk. The one that makes the final call never touches the market either. You could have this running by Friday. Most people reading this will not, and in a few months they will be paying somebody who did. The whole build is in the post below ↓ Save it while it still sounds strange. Give it a quarter and this is just how a retail account works.

cvxv666

208,198 просмотров • 1 месяц назад