Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

MUST SEE: State Dept once again refuses to recognize 4th Geneva Convention for Occupied Palestine. Their intentionally ambiguous response may be an attempt to turn Gaza into a free-fire zone. When I pressed for clarity, they threatened to eject me. 🎥: Decensored News

1,817,820 views • 2 years ago •via X (Twitter)

10 Comments

Sam Husseini's profile picture
Sam Husseini2 years ago

See writeup for legal analysis, possible legal strategies and transcript:

Laurence (Larry) Boorstein's profile picture
Laurence (Larry) Boorstein2 years ago

@decensorednews There are 4 main war crimes Genocide. Crimes Against Humanity. War Crimes. Ethnic Cleansing. Israel is committing all four. US support for Israel including blocking UN ceasefire resolutions and sending bombs and other military aid to Israel constitutes complicity.

gr♉︎wth🔻's profile picture
gr♉︎wth🔻2 years ago

@decensorednews He has taken questions everyday of this week. However, he has refused to answer the question & goes back to his talking points. His non-answer is in fact an answer. He is fully aware Israel is not abiding by international law so he refuses to answer, & it’s clear to anyone.

Raafat Rohaiem's profile picture
Raafat Rohaiem2 years ago

@decensorednews I honestly don't think this moron from the State Department knows what the Fourth Geneva Convention is.

Professor Kallas=Γεώργιος Καλαντζής: Γεια σου!'s profile picture
Professor Kallas=Γεώργιος Καλαντζής: Γεια σου!2 years ago

FYI: THOSE STATE SIGNATURY TO UN 4TH GENEVA CONVENTION: HERE IT IS: Article 4 - Definition of protected persons Persons protected by the Convention are those who, at a given moment and in any manner whatsoever, find themselves, in case of a conflict or occupation, in the hands of a Party to the conflict or Occupying Power of which they are not nationals. Nationals of a State which is not bound by the Convention are not protected by it. Nationals of a neutral State who find themselves in the territory of a belligerent State, and nationals of a co-belligerent State, shall not be regarded as protected persons while the State of which they are nationals has normal diplomatic representation in the State in whose hands they are. The provisions of Part II are, however, wider in application, as defined in Article 13 . Persons protected by the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field of August 12, 1949, or by the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded, Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea of August 12, 1949, or by the Geneva Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War of August 12, 1949, shall not be considered as protected persons within the meaning of the present Convention. HOWEVER, UNDER THE AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALIST "INTERNATIONAL RULES BASED ORDER" OF AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM COVERING ITSELF AND ITS ALLIES, AKA, ZIONIST "ISRAEL"... THE CLASSICAL NAME FOR THIS AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM IS THIS HEREIN:

Representative Press's profile picture
Representative Press2 years ago

@decensorednews God forbid we insist that we are a nation of laws! The Biden Administration is making a good case that they should be prosecuted.

🌞's profile picture
🌞2 years ago

@decensorednews the phenomenon of politicians being unable to answer yes or no questions is so fascinating.

Rebecca Espinoza's profile picture
Rebecca Espinoza2 years ago

@decensorednews We need more journalists like you, Mr. Husseini. That whole room should be putting his feet under fire as you have.

Kakusandha's profile picture
Kakusandha2 years ago

Never has America lost a war ... But name, if you can, the last peace the United States won. Victory yes, but this country has never made a successful peace because peace requires exchaawnging ideas, concepts, thoughts, and recognizing the fact that two distinct systems of life can exist together without conflict. Consider how quickly America seems to be facing its allies of one war as new enemies. #GazaGenocide 🇵🇸

The Independent Review's profile picture
The Independent Review2 years ago

@decensorednews Jonah Hill can't answer a simple question. Rules for me not for thee.

Related Videos