Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Mute no longer counters Grim, but this makes no sense from either a gameplay perspective or narrative based one. One of the arguments for this change has been that a ping is something that only exists for us as players, and the operators of course wouldn't see a magical...

KudosOnYT's profile picture

Kudos 💜

13,305 subscribers

99,936 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ИгрыНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Plenty to be proud about 🤘 "We all hope and wish that the that the playoff thing would work...But if it doesn't, there's still a lot to be proud of and a lot of, a lot of great accomplishments, not only from a team perspective, but but some individuals on this team as well"
2:04

Plenty to be proud about 🤘 "We all hope and wish that the that the playoff thing would work...But if it doesn't, there's still a lot to be proud of and a lot of, a lot of great accomplishments, not only from a team perspective, but but some individuals on this team as well"

Nash

24,408 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Gutfeld: The timing is telling you that this cancer is being used as a tool to deflect from outrage to sympathy.. So we can feel sad. But that's not going to infringe on the space in my brain that is reserved and dedicated to this cover up of his incapacitation. So you're not going to get a mute or a pause from me, but nice try
0:56

Gutfeld: The timing is telling you that this cancer is being used as a tool to deflect from outrage to sympathy.. So we can feel sad. But that's not going to infringe on the space in my brain that is reserved and dedicated to this cover up of his incapacitation. So you're not going to get a mute or a pause from me, but nice try

Acyn

113,335 просмотров • 1 год назад

#1 Elon Musk says the mission of Twitter 2.0 is to be the most reliable source of information and to provide citizens with a way to control the narrative: "The goal is to have Twitter be the best source of truth, the most timely and accurate source of truth, even if the truth is something we don't want to hear or unpleasant. Not just is something true or not, but what is the narrative. Most people don't appreciate that the media controls the narrative, so there are many things that could be talked about in the world, but only a few things can fit on the front page. But Twitter doesn't have a limitation like that, so the public can control the narrative, and the public can inform themselves as to what the narrative should be. That's a really big deal. It's a forum for citizen journalism or for the public to get together and communicate in a way that was never possible before so you can really know what's going on."
1:08

#1 Elon Musk says the mission of Twitter 2.0 is to be the most reliable source of information and to provide citizens with a way to control the narrative: "The goal is to have Twitter be the best source of truth, the most timely and accurate source of truth, even if the truth is something we don't want to hear or unpleasant. Not just is something true or not, but what is the narrative. Most people don't appreciate that the media controls the narrative, so there are many things that could be talked about in the world, but only a few things can fit on the front page. But Twitter doesn't have a limitation like that, so the public can control the narrative, and the public can inform themselves as to what the narrative should be. That's a really big deal. It's a forum for citizen journalism or for the public to get together and communicate in a way that was never possible before so you can really know what's going on."

KanekoaTheGreat

1,650,088 просмотров • 3 лет назад

🇺🇦🇷🇺Zelensky wants Russia to withdraw its troops to the February 2022 line and fire that he wants western support. So, if he gets the west to support him, this will be his demand. “Negotiations can be fair and unfair. It can be different. The question is who Ukraine will be with at that time. If it is not alone, then Ukraine will do everything to ensure that the negotiations are fair. And fair means guarantees that the enemy will return, at a minimum, to the line of full-scale invasion. And this would be a fair opportunity to start a dialogue. But it can be different. That's how it happens in life.”
0:41

🇺🇦🇷🇺Zelensky wants Russia to withdraw its troops to the February 2022 line and fire that he wants western support. So, if he gets the west to support him, this will be his demand. “Negotiations can be fair and unfair. It can be different. The question is who Ukraine will be with at that time. If it is not alone, then Ukraine will do everything to ensure that the negotiations are fair. And fair means guarantees that the enemy will return, at a minimum, to the line of full-scale invasion. And this would be a fair opportunity to start a dialogue. But it can be different. That's how it happens in life.”

Lord Bebo

114,711 просмотров • 1 год назад

💬: What raises suspicion of surveillance is this: in Dani’s case, it was said that her side had already received a formal legal notice two weeks earlier. The notice basically stated that if certain matters were not explained, the contract would be terminated. What’s most shocking is that, according to reports, one of the main issues raised was why a parent had replaced a phone after losing it. The implication seemed to be that the parent changed the phone in order to destroy evidence that might have been on it. You can sit there and spin your own baseless theories like that if you want, but if the phone hadn’t been replaced, were you planning to demand it and run forensic analysis on it? Even if you asked for the phone, just like President Lee Jae-myung has said before, you are not an investigative authority or a law enforcement agency. You have no right to demand a phone, especially a parent’s phone. When I heard this from a tip-off, I honestly found it terrifying.
0:26

💬: What raises suspicion of surveillance is this: in Dani’s case, it was said that her side had already received a formal legal notice two weeks earlier. The notice basically stated that if certain matters were not explained, the contract would be terminated. What’s most shocking is that, according to reports, one of the main issues raised was why a parent had replaced a phone after losing it. The implication seemed to be that the parent changed the phone in order to destroy evidence that might have been on it. You can sit there and spin your own baseless theories like that if you want, but if the phone hadn’t been replaced, were you planning to demand it and run forensic analysis on it? Even if you asked for the phone, just like President Lee Jae-myung has said before, you are not an investigative authority or a law enforcement agency. You have no right to demand a phone, especially a parent’s phone. When I heard this from a tip-off, I honestly found it terrifying.

1tokki

293,109 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

If I have a plug or a hack to get a better deal or more food, would I share it online? Probably not, the chances that it would ruin it me or the company is pretty high. Especially if other locations catch on. I feel that if I shared this, what would happen is more and more people would try to take advantage of it and the store would issue a policy to stop it. What I’m conflicted about is, by ordering a taco in a bowl, I would be getting a $15 bowl for $4. Is it my fault the company has a loophole like that, or should I even feel guilty about exploiting it if it’s only for my benefit? Or is it a scenario where everything is fair game because the restaurant allows us to do that. Whose fault is it that we figured out how to get their pricier item for less? Someone else called it theft, but is this really theft if it’s allowed? They allow us to put our taco shell in a bowl. They allow us to ask for as many extras that we want. So would I really be the bad guy for taking advantage of this? I figured if this was a real issue the store would have stopped it, and to this day as far as I know, anyone can still do this. When I get a chance this week I’ll go and try to do this again to see if it still works, I’ll keep you posted.
2:59

If I have a plug or a hack to get a better deal or more food, would I share it online? Probably not, the chances that it would ruin it me or the company is pretty high. Especially if other locations catch on. I feel that if I shared this, what would happen is more and more people would try to take advantage of it and the store would issue a policy to stop it. What I’m conflicted about is, by ordering a taco in a bowl, I would be getting a $15 bowl for $4. Is it my fault the company has a loophole like that, or should I even feel guilty about exploiting it if it’s only for my benefit? Or is it a scenario where everything is fair game because the restaurant allows us to do that. Whose fault is it that we figured out how to get their pricier item for less? Someone else called it theft, but is this really theft if it’s allowed? They allow us to put our taco shell in a bowl. They allow us to ask for as many extras that we want. So would I really be the bad guy for taking advantage of this? I figured if this was a real issue the store would have stopped it, and to this day as far as I know, anyone can still do this. When I get a chance this week I’ll go and try to do this again to see if it still works, I’ll keep you posted.

SonnyBoy🇺🇸

246,635 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

"I worked for the Speaker of the House. I worked for the President of the United States. One of the things you learn in those jobs is that ultimately no one is fully in charge of anything, and the world is very, very complex. I would read in the Washington Post how Republican leaders had all these plans and they were going to pull things this way or that way. And then I'd get to work and to say that no one had a plan would be a gross understatement. No one had any idea what was going to happen that afternoon. The idea that in a free society somebody is pulling the strings and someone has a nine-step plan and you're just a pawn in it is just very, very implausible. Our society doesn't really work that way. Our elites now are not ultra-competent. You can say a lot of things about them, but I would not say that we have ultra-competent leaders of any institution. I can see the appeal of wanting to believe that it's all a false flag or a plan. But when you actually see the system work—it's both good news and bad news—but nobody's in charge of everything."
1:38

"I worked for the Speaker of the House. I worked for the President of the United States. One of the things you learn in those jobs is that ultimately no one is fully in charge of anything, and the world is very, very complex. I would read in the Washington Post how Republican leaders had all these plans and they were going to pull things this way or that way. And then I'd get to work and to say that no one had a plan would be a gross understatement. No one had any idea what was going to happen that afternoon. The idea that in a free society somebody is pulling the strings and someone has a nine-step plan and you're just a pawn in it is just very, very implausible. Our society doesn't really work that way. Our elites now are not ultra-competent. You can say a lot of things about them, but I would not say that we have ultra-competent leaders of any institution. I can see the appeal of wanting to believe that it's all a false flag or a plan. But when you actually see the system work—it's both good news and bad news—but nobody's in charge of everything."

Michael Shermer

128,354 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Elon Musk: Any country that allows unfettered mass immigration will cease to exist. “The mass immigration is insane and will lead to the destruction of any country that allows unfettered mass immigration. That country will simply cease to exist. At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a numbers situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world, and let's say you're a country of 50 million, 60 million, for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious. If you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people are no longer because they've been teleported to America, then the region, the geographic region, would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country.” From: Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 5, 2025
1:42

Elon Musk: Any country that allows unfettered mass immigration will cease to exist. “The mass immigration is insane and will lead to the destruction of any country that allows unfettered mass immigration. That country will simply cease to exist. At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a numbers situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world, and let's say you're a country of 50 million, 60 million, for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that is truly obvious. If you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people are no longer because they've been teleported to America, then the region, the geographic region, would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country.” From: Interview with Matteo Salvini, April 5, 2025

ELON CLIPS

27,107 просмотров • 1 год назад

I see this comment now and then but pro or not, the argument is that the game CAN be played like that, due to a learning curve that recent games got rid of. You can pull it off if you want to and once you get the hang of it, this is what your gameplay can effortlessly look like.
1:03

I see this comment now and then but pro or not, the argument is that the game CAN be played like that, due to a learning curve that recent games got rid of. You can pull it off if you want to and once you get the hang of it, this is what your gameplay can effortlessly look like.

Sebastian Highwind Dell’Aria 🌌

594,200 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

For decades you guys we been dealing with this! Y’all so scared to lose your Guns! Seriously that’s the real reason we can’t fix this. Talk to people who own a gun and see. That is the fear not that their kid could die or their love ones can die not that. Losing their right to carry a gun is the bigger fear! WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK IS WRONG WITH US!! It seems to me we still in the “they can’t do that or that can’t happen” phase BUT IT IS HAPPENING WAKE UP! You will have to explain to the next generation why it’s so fucked up now. We can be the ones to change this. But we are PUSSYS! We are so scared of change that we don’t realize that change don’t give a fuck about our fear. It’s gonna happen with or without you. But we have the chance now to work with change to make it better. If not get ready for the fuckedupness(yea I made a word) that’s about to occur! Not one of you, NOT ONE OF US, can say “how did this happen” we know we let it happen! GET OUT OF YOUR OWN SHIT AND PARTICIPATE YOU LIVE HERE TOOO!! UGHHHHH! #sosickofus
3:41

For decades you guys we been dealing with this! Y’all so scared to lose your Guns! Seriously that’s the real reason we can’t fix this. Talk to people who own a gun and see. That is the fear not that their kid could die or their love ones can die not that. Losing their right to carry a gun is the bigger fear! WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK IS WRONG WITH US!! It seems to me we still in the “they can’t do that or that can’t happen” phase BUT IT IS HAPPENING WAKE UP! You will have to explain to the next generation why it’s so fucked up now. We can be the ones to change this. But we are PUSSYS! We are so scared of change that we don’t realize that change don’t give a fuck about our fear. It’s gonna happen with or without you. But we have the chance now to work with change to make it better. If not get ready for the fuckedupness(yea I made a word) that’s about to occur! Not one of you, NOT ONE OF US, can say “how did this happen” we know we let it happen! GET OUT OF YOUR OWN SHIT AND PARTICIPATE YOU LIVE HERE TOOO!! UGHHHHH! #sosickofus

Leslie Jones 🦋

217,499 просмотров • 2 лет назад

You do not have a past-self living within your mind or body. You only exist in this moment at the age you currently are with all that you've lived through. No part of you is a child. You cannot heal the 6-year-old self who was neglected. That neglect was very real if that's something you experienced. The pain you feel from that neglect, it matters and it's real. But only the 25 or 32 or 45 or 56-year-old self staring back at you in the mirror can actually be healed. And she can't be healed by you. The self cannot be both the problem and the solution. It's actually a power outside of you that can heal you as you are right now. Namely, it is the God who created you, who alone has the power to heal you and to help you. And yes, He speaks to you as His daughter, no matter your age, but not as a toddler. He sees and cares about your childhood, but He communicates to you as the adult you are, not as the baby that you were. The Christian approach to trauma is compassion. Yes, absolutely. But it is also the difficult Holy Spirit empowered work of finding our worth in Christ and forgiving those who have wronged us. This is where true liberation is found. It is not found from self-discovery and self-love. No amount of speaking to your inner child, which doesn't actually exist, will lead you down a path of lasting fulfillment. Counseling, in light of that truth, can be helpful and healing for the Christian, but no borrowing of New Age psychology will do.
1:28

You do not have a past-self living within your mind or body. You only exist in this moment at the age you currently are with all that you've lived through. No part of you is a child. You cannot heal the 6-year-old self who was neglected. That neglect was very real if that's something you experienced. The pain you feel from that neglect, it matters and it's real. But only the 25 or 32 or 45 or 56-year-old self staring back at you in the mirror can actually be healed. And she can't be healed by you. The self cannot be both the problem and the solution. It's actually a power outside of you that can heal you as you are right now. Namely, it is the God who created you, who alone has the power to heal you and to help you. And yes, He speaks to you as His daughter, no matter your age, but not as a toddler. He sees and cares about your childhood, but He communicates to you as the adult you are, not as the baby that you were. The Christian approach to trauma is compassion. Yes, absolutely. But it is also the difficult Holy Spirit empowered work of finding our worth in Christ and forgiving those who have wronged us. This is where true liberation is found. It is not found from self-discovery and self-love. No amount of speaking to your inner child, which doesn't actually exist, will lead you down a path of lasting fulfillment. Counseling, in light of that truth, can be helpful and healing for the Christian, but no borrowing of New Age psychology will do.

Relatable with Allie Beth Stuckey

10,846 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Elon Musk: Unfettered mass immigration will lead to the destruction of any country that allows it. “At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a number situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world and let's say you're a country of, you know, 50 million, 60 million for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that should be obvious. And if you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people no longer be because they've been teleported to America, then the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country. A country is its people, not its geography.” Source: Elon Musk at Lega Congress, April 5, 2025
1:13

Elon Musk: Unfettered mass immigration will lead to the destruction of any country that allows it. “At the end of the day, it is a numbers game, a number situation. If there are 8 billion people in the world and let's say you're a country of, you know, 50 million, 60 million for a medium-sized country, but even for a country like the United States, which is 350 million, given that there are 8 billion people in the world, it only takes a few percent of the rest of the world to move to the country to where it is no longer that country. A country is not its geography. A country is its people. This is a fundamental concept that should be obvious. And if you took the people of Italy and you teleported the people of Italy to, say, some part of the United States, it would still be Italy. But if you teleported a bunch of people from some other part of the world to Italy, where the Italian people no longer be because they've been teleported to America, then the geographic region would no longer be Italy. It would be that other country. A country is its people, not its geography.” Source: Elon Musk at Lega Congress, April 5, 2025

ELON CLIPS

34,348 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️
2:34

Rick Rubin tells Andrew Huberman how he deals with creative or writer’s block. He treats his work like a diary entry (and doesn’t worry about internal or external judgment): ➡️ “What's the cause of the block? The block is usually something that's either personal ("I'm not good enough") or it can be a confidence issue ("I don't have anything to say") or it could be...thinking about someone else ("nobody's going to like what I make"). Do you know what I'm saying? So, it's either fear of self-judgment or external judgment. If you're making something with a freedom of "this is something I'm making for myself for now", that is all [you have to do]. It is a diary entry. Everything I make is a diary entry. The beauty of a diary entry is that I can write my diary entry and you can't tell me that my diary entry wasn't good enough. Or that [the diary entry] is not what I experienced. Of course it's what I experienced: I'm writing a personal diary for myself and no one else can judge if it is my experience of my life. Everything we make can be that: a personal reflection of who we are in that moment of time. It doesn't have to be the greatest you could ever do. It doesn't have to have any expectation that it's going to change the world. It doesn't have to sell a certain number of copies for any reason. It doesn't have any of those things at all. It is "I'm making this thing for me and I want to do it to the best of my ability and to where I feel good about it". [The work] is honest of where I'm at and if you're living in this world of just being honest to where you're at, there's nothing blocking you. There are no blocks. The blocks are all based on dealing with a different force or a different perception that is made up.” ⬅️

Trung Phan

1,619,350 просмотров • 2 лет назад

“The sex discrimination commissioner is in the awkward position of having to argue that a man is not only a woman but that men can be lesbians if they say so. As painful as it has been for me being put through this, I can’t fathom the agony of having to make those arguments.”
3:12

“The sex discrimination commissioner is in the awkward position of having to argue that a man is not only a woman but that men can be lesbians if they say so. As painful as it has been for me being put through this, I can’t fathom the agony of having to make those arguments.”

Sall Grover

92,105 просмотров • 1 год назад

Let me give everyone just a little common sense test. It may be that I retired from the United States Air Force, that the answer is crystal clear to me and maybe a bit more challenging for others. So the guy on the left is claiming to be the president of the United States of America. He claims his name is Joe Biden but we know Joe Biden is dead. He faced a military tribunal and was executed. So really do you really think that a president of the United States of America gets off a plane and gets into some random dudes vehicle? Only someone that doesn't know anything about the military would think such nonsense. Or are you someone that has a great deal of common Sense and critical thinking ability and can see this motorcade on the right and know that that's what a presidential motorcade looks like and that means the president is really in there. This so happened to be president Trump on his way to South Carolina rally. So is the real president on the left side or is the real president on the right side? This really should be a no-brainer but of course we know liberals absolutely beyond a shadow of a doubt or no brainers they have no brains, they have no common sense, there are cognitive dissonance is all messed up, and they have zero critical thinking capabilities. By the way even former presidents don't have motorcades that look like that for anybody thinking that the excuse for it. So-called president gets in an Uber carrying his own luggage and people can't wake the hell up.
1:01

Let me give everyone just a little common sense test. It may be that I retired from the United States Air Force, that the answer is crystal clear to me and maybe a bit more challenging for others. So the guy on the left is claiming to be the president of the United States of America. He claims his name is Joe Biden but we know Joe Biden is dead. He faced a military tribunal and was executed. So really do you really think that a president of the United States of America gets off a plane and gets into some random dudes vehicle? Only someone that doesn't know anything about the military would think such nonsense. Or are you someone that has a great deal of common Sense and critical thinking ability and can see this motorcade on the right and know that that's what a presidential motorcade looks like and that means the president is really in there. This so happened to be president Trump on his way to South Carolina rally. So is the real president on the left side or is the real president on the right side? This really should be a no-brainer but of course we know liberals absolutely beyond a shadow of a doubt or no brainers they have no brains, they have no common sense, there are cognitive dissonance is all messed up, and they have zero critical thinking capabilities. By the way even former presidents don't have motorcades that look like that for anybody thinking that the excuse for it. So-called president gets in an Uber carrying his own luggage and people can't wake the hell up.

Truth Awakening

1,755,701 просмотров • 2 лет назад

lando about the DSQ: “from what i had to do in the race, there was already some expectation that it might happen. so it wasn't a shock, it wasn't a surprise. we knew we were having a lot more issues than we ever expected during the race and that led to already the expectation that some things might not be as we expect. maybe it would have hurt more if we won the race, but we didn't so it didn't change. it doesn't change anything. there's no point being too sad about it. of course everyone in the team was a bit gutted about the result because there's a lot of effort that goes into it. so yeah it's the same for everyone but like 0.1 millimeters or whatever, it's like a piece of paper. so it was frustrating but actually i was quite okay, just excited to go again this weekend. it doesn't change anything i want to try and win in qatar and try and win in abu dhabi. so yeah it sucks, but that's life sometimes”
1:03

lando about the DSQ: “from what i had to do in the race, there was already some expectation that it might happen. so it wasn't a shock, it wasn't a surprise. we knew we were having a lot more issues than we ever expected during the race and that led to already the expectation that some things might not be as we expect. maybe it would have hurt more if we won the race, but we didn't so it didn't change. it doesn't change anything. there's no point being too sad about it. of course everyone in the team was a bit gutted about the result because there's a lot of effort that goes into it. so yeah it's the same for everyone but like 0.1 millimeters or whatever, it's like a piece of paper. so it was frustrating but actually i was quite okay, just excited to go again this weekend. it doesn't change anything i want to try and win in qatar and try and win in abu dhabi. so yeah it sucks, but that's life sometimes”

ray

214,829 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨The Only Way that it Can STOP is if the BRICS Countries 🚨Jeffrey Sachs: Trump is DELUSIONAL and he is a MEGALOMANIC. 🚨But on top of that, behind him is the CIA and Mossad. 🚨So this is not Trump alone. These are grandiose ideas, longstanding. So it's not only Trump, but there's no break. There's no foot on the brake. This is only an accelerator towards expanded war right now. And the only way that it can stop is if the BRICS countries, and that means India, that means Brazil, that means Russia, that means China, South Africa and others, and it's Iran, which is a member of the BRICS, says this is not the way the world can work. They have to stand up to American hegemony. This is the only way the world canAmerican hegemony. This is the only way the world can be safe. And so this is actually a responsibility of the BRICS right now, which is the only standing bulwark against America's global empire.
1:12

🚨The Only Way that it Can STOP is if the BRICS Countries 🚨Jeffrey Sachs: Trump is DELUSIONAL and he is a MEGALOMANIC. 🚨But on top of that, behind him is the CIA and Mossad. 🚨So this is not Trump alone. These are grandiose ideas, longstanding. So it's not only Trump, but there's no break. There's no foot on the brake. This is only an accelerator towards expanded war right now. And the only way that it can stop is if the BRICS countries, and that means India, that means Brazil, that means Russia, that means China, South Africa and others, and it's Iran, which is a member of the BRICS, says this is not the way the world can work. They have to stand up to American hegemony. This is the only way the world canAmerican hegemony. This is the only way the world can be safe. And so this is actually a responsibility of the BRICS right now, which is the only standing bulwark against America's global empire.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

15,189 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress
3:42

Indyref 2014 was rigged, most of it happened in plain sight. Sara Salyers of Salvo.Scot explains how. "In a consultative referendum, an opinion poll, there's no contract, there's no actual requirement, which David Cameron did point out, to abide by the results of that referendum. "So they did not then set it up in the way that a proper constitutional referendum would have been set up according to international standards to begin with. "The people who would be voting in that referendum would be people who had a stake in the future of the nation whose future they were voting on. "We had every boy and his dog able to vote. So people who hadn't been in Scotland for, you know, more than maybe a few months, basically, all these people had a vote on the future of Scotland as an independent nation, which is, if you just think about it, think how absurd that is, people with no stake. "Now, had that been serious, you know, a real referendum, that we were going to be allowed to have a chance of winning, they would have applied international standards, they would have used something like the new Caledonia franchise, which is a really solid. "And it doesn't exclude people who've moved into Scotland. It isn't just ethnic Scots, it's, you know, it's people who have a genuine stake, interest in the future of that nation. That franchise, it shouldn't be a council... local council franchise, it should be one that reflects the stakeholders, who are the real stakeholders, and that's what that needs to be. That it wasn't, should have told us everything. "Then we had the Edinburgh Agreement, and the Edinburgh Agreement said that there was a Purdah period, during which no new policies were to be announced. There was no... you know, all the campaigning would go on and then it stops. You can rehearse the arguments and everything that's been put forward, but nothing new should be introduced. "Well, we got 'The Vow', 'Devo Max', less than two days before the vote. 'If you vote No, you will get this'. Of course, that did not deliver, but it completely breached the Edinburgh Agreement. "Well, what the sad afterwards was, 'Well, there's no evidence that it altered people's minds. Of course it did. Of course it told people, 'Well, if you don't want to go all the way to independence, we could have,' I think Gordon Brown said, 'it would be almost a federal relationship,' you know, blah, blah, blah. "And that that meant people could say, 'Well, if we're afraid of what will happen, afraid of being pulled out of the European Union, we'd like a lot more power, but we were not sure about a total break...'. Well, of course, then they voted No. "Then you also had the media. And in a properly run referendum, according to international rules, you make sure it's 50-50, that people get both sides of the argument, absolutely equally. "There was a full study done, and it took one guy, Glasgow University lecturer in particular, to go through everything and come back and say, 'Look, it was over 70%, 'No' media coverage', and that also breaches international standards. "So we didn't have any possibility of a fair referendum. And that wasn't coincidental. And had there been any kind of vote tampering, say, with the postal vote, because it was only consultative and there was no actual, therefore fraud, it makes it nearly impossible to get a judicial review. "And there is no way, no matter what they have said, no matter what they have told us, 'Get a majority of members elected to Westminster' and that 'You don't need a referendum', or if 'Scotland wants to leave, then it has the right to do so'. No matter what the British State has said, that was never true." Sara Salyers on the @untribalpol @TheScotCongress

ScotNews

21,466 просмотров • 1 год назад

🚨📢Merck's Gardasil HPV Vaccine made in North Carolina has now became a subject of hundreds of new lawsuits out of the Charlotte area. 185 Plaintiffs argue Gardasil vaccine gave them same cancer they were trying to ward off..that only popped off after whey were vaccinated. Queen City News Reporter: "So, what stood out most to you?" Khalif Rhodes - Chief legal Analyst: "First thing i'm gonna say, let's do it up, is money written all over it? Very basic portion of it you have to do..is prove there's a duty breached is causation and there's some type of damages." "Well, i believe that you're giving me this medicine that's supposed to be preventing me from getting this disease and also the secondary effect is preventing me from getting cancer" "But not only is not preventing me from getting cancer, it's also causing cancer" "So the causal connection to you being the reason to my injuries, it's pretty easy" "I say it's easy but they will be a lot of experts that costs a lot of money..but in the end of it these are 185 plaintiffs in all being placed in one lawsuit" "This will be a large payout, a significant settlement if it ever goes to trial, a jury would give extensive punitive damages" Queen City News Reporter: "You talking about easy to prove causation here, how likely is that to prove from your perspective as a lawyer? Khalif Rhodes: "If i can establish that you a duty, ok, you owe me some duty to protect me from something, in this case, from a medication that's not doing what's it's supposed to be doing" "or you're telling me that i bought something and it's not doing you have presented to me, you've already created a duty." "Now you breached a duty of causation portion, is, did me breaching the duty cause your injuries" "Well i didn't take your medicine..standard in law school is the "but for", but for me, taking the medicine from you, i wouldn't have this incident happening" "Additionally, "but" for me relying on you saying that it will work? I probably would have never take your medication" "Now, the problem though, is this that the only vaccine out there for HPV happens to be this only one" "That would be the pushback, but the problems is the research lacked" "In these type of drugs that are pushed out when there's an immediate incident, some type of issue, its rush to try to find a vaccine to find a cure" "and plaintiffs argue it should have been, a deeper breath of information that should have been a deeper pool and this has been hundreds of millions of people have taken this medication" "so, i can see the plaintiffs only getting larger, i can see a lot of other folks when they see these type of reports sayin i want to be a part of this type of claim and so it's unfortunate.."
3:17

🚨📢Merck's Gardasil HPV Vaccine made in North Carolina has now became a subject of hundreds of new lawsuits out of the Charlotte area. 185 Plaintiffs argue Gardasil vaccine gave them same cancer they were trying to ward off..that only popped off after whey were vaccinated. Queen City News Reporter: "So, what stood out most to you?" Khalif Rhodes - Chief legal Analyst: "First thing i'm gonna say, let's do it up, is money written all over it? Very basic portion of it you have to do..is prove there's a duty breached is causation and there's some type of damages." "Well, i believe that you're giving me this medicine that's supposed to be preventing me from getting this disease and also the secondary effect is preventing me from getting cancer" "But not only is not preventing me from getting cancer, it's also causing cancer" "So the causal connection to you being the reason to my injuries, it's pretty easy" "I say it's easy but they will be a lot of experts that costs a lot of money..but in the end of it these are 185 plaintiffs in all being placed in one lawsuit" "This will be a large payout, a significant settlement if it ever goes to trial, a jury would give extensive punitive damages" Queen City News Reporter: "You talking about easy to prove causation here, how likely is that to prove from your perspective as a lawyer? Khalif Rhodes: "If i can establish that you a duty, ok, you owe me some duty to protect me from something, in this case, from a medication that's not doing what's it's supposed to be doing" "or you're telling me that i bought something and it's not doing you have presented to me, you've already created a duty." "Now you breached a duty of causation portion, is, did me breaching the duty cause your injuries" "Well i didn't take your medicine..standard in law school is the "but for", but for me, taking the medicine from you, i wouldn't have this incident happening" "Additionally, "but" for me relying on you saying that it will work? I probably would have never take your medication" "Now, the problem though, is this that the only vaccine out there for HPV happens to be this only one" "That would be the pushback, but the problems is the research lacked" "In these type of drugs that are pushed out when there's an immediate incident, some type of issue, its rush to try to find a vaccine to find a cure" "and plaintiffs argue it should have been, a deeper breath of information that should have been a deeper pool and this has been hundreds of millions of people have taken this medication" "so, i can see the plaintiffs only getting larger, i can see a lot of other folks when they see these type of reports sayin i want to be a part of this type of claim and so it's unfortunate.."

VaccineMole

49,034 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад