正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

My commentary on the Sevastopol and Dagestan attacks:

767,907 次观看 • 2 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

Zero to Zero 的头像
Zero to Zero2 年前

This is purely terrorism. Unacceptable!

Bite Me Crank Matey 的头像
Bite Me Crank Matey2 年前

As always, your commentary is spot on.

LFG! 的头像
LFG!2 年前

This is very important: All American institutions have been "hijacked". NATO is a tool of a trillionaire in order to create an artificial war and profit from it. The US citizens don't want endless wars. they have better things to do. As you can see clearly, the trillionaires can bankrupt any country, install a fake President and open any border. The US is not an "enemy". The US citizens got also fucked up immensely, for decades... There is a different enemy that must be dealt with.

The Aureus Press 的头像
The Aureus Press2 年前

So the 'war on terror' Americans are now the terrorists

James Jos. Kroeger 的头像
James Jos. Kroeger2 年前

The crucial question in my mind is: What if Russia responds by destroying one of the US' military satellites that they figure was used in the attack? Positives aspects: it would be a response that seriously hurts the US but without killing any Americans, which an Iskandar strike on a NATO base certainly would do Downside risk: IF the Space Force already has its military satellites controlled by AI & it is programmed to initiate a full nuclear attack on Russia if one of its military satellites is destroyed by Russia, it's Armageddon😱 Hoped for benefit: Russia's looking for a way to warn the US with its response to stop escalating & start negotiating. One would think that a Russian attack on one of its satellites would be THE kind of warning message that Moscow wants to send to the Pentagon, that it is risking the whole enchilada with its brinksmanship game...a jolt of fear that could shock our generals into sudden sobriety? So what do you think, Scott? Are there grave risks involved in Russia attacking America's satellites?

PolitRealist 的头像
PolitRealist2 年前

Thanks for the update 🤝

Harri_EST🇪🇪🇺🇦 的头像
Harri_EST🇪🇪🇺🇦2 年前

If indeed it was ATACAMs attack it was against Belbek air base from which your beloved 🇷🇺 has been launching attack against Ukraine 🇺🇦 daily since beginning of this full scale war 24.02.2022 and let me remind you that your beloved 🇷🇺 has been involved killing Ukrainians since 2014 in Donbas region! Annexation of Crimea 2015(which was and still is btw a sovereign territory of 🇺🇦) was done by russia not some green men and it was done illegally, there is no russian crimea! Crimea has and always has been Ukraine! Belbek air base is a legit target as the attacks against Ukraine are being conducted from this air base, so cut the shit it was a terrorist attack! If Russia didn’t want civilians to get hurt, they shouldn’t of tried to intercept the missiles over civilian population, as we all know very well Ukraine does not deliberately target civilians unlike your russian counterparts do every single fcking day..so please take the hand of @jacksonhinklle and get yourselves a 1 way ticket to Russia 🇷🇺

DMC 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇬🇧 🇮🇪 ☯️ ✝️ ☸️ 的头像
DMC 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 🇬🇧 🇮🇪 ☯️ ✝️ ☸️2 年前

No it's something else There's an evil unseen force playing us all against each other

Dr. Priscilla RivasLoria 🇺🇳🇪🇸🇵🇷🇺🇸 的头像
Dr. Priscilla RivasLoria 🇺🇳🇪🇸🇵🇷🇺🇸2 年前

Thank you Scott for taking time away from your family and giving us your take. As usual 🎯

Ed H. Hanna 的头像
Ed H. Hanna2 年前

In response to such attacks, one could argue that a minimal course of action would involve deeming all NATO entities within the Ukrainian boundary, as well as any NATO Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) operations/UAVs in Ukraine or over the Black Sea, as legitimate targets for immediate retaliation.

相关视频