My issue with the Indian Express report is not that it highlighted disagreements within the Election Commission. The issue is that it appears to focus heavily on selected objections and internal notes while giving far less attention to what happened afterwards. In any multi-member institution, disagreements, questions and written... observations are part of the decision-making process. If discussions are reported but the final consensus, approvals and outcomes receive much less attention, readers can walk away with a very different impression from the complete picture.show more

Aunty ji, the change in Form 6 legally can't be done by Election Commission but it was done anyway and this was raised by the other two election commissioners, despite this, the changes were made. So how this is a small disagreement?

Don’t merely become a PR agency for @BJP4India There’s a fundamental difference between having disagreements and raising serious objections to decisions being taken unilaterally within a constitutional body. The ECI must also answer how unanimity was reached on Form 6 and address the other objections raised by the Election Commissioners.

We are talking about decisions concerning India's electoral rolls where two of the three Election Commissioners reportedly recorded repeated objections to actions taken without their knowledge or approval. If the Commission is a three-member body, the process matters as much as the final decision. With over 13 crore names omitted from draft rolls during SIR, these concerns deserve scrutiny and not dismissal as mere internal differences.

the final outcome was 97 voters in Goa got dumped form 6 got altered it'll take 12 years for some unfortunate bengal folks to vote again. 'nuff said.

Chill didi let ECI answer questions asked don't be their mouthpiece........They should be held accountable and we should ask questions..........

What kind of dumb video is this, none of the questions have been addressed. You are repeating what they Said.

You can try your best, but it is not going to work.

Press Note didn't deny the events as per @IndianExpress report, you mentioned reports didn't had conclusion; but main question is for the events only. The two of them even didn't know few of the decision made at final. Press Note doesn't even has signature of those 3 members

The ship is sinking. Some rats don’t get it.

You clearly didn't read the thread from @RitikaChopra__ disagreements are common in any place. The problem arises when decisions are made without others knowing, with no meetings taking place and the two ECs kept in the dark most of the time. And about ECINET

If dissent to a decision is recorded in writing and the decision is signed only by one then it cannot be turned into a consensus. If dissent is recorded in the minutes of a discussion but the final decision bears the signatures of all members then it can be said to have been taken by consensus.

Pl explain the following: 1. Was due process followed in change of form 6? Why 97 voters in Goa not added back ? Who authorised to file 33 L appeals against addition in west bengal ?

Nice try to diffuse....if it is healthy disagreements, then these won't happen - (1) Escalating to cabinet secretary (2) 14 dissent notes in 10 months...after the first 2 notes..they would be sitting and discussing face to face (3) Forget dissent...they are not even in the loop

Who ever are defending these guys make their list. When all this shit show is over, these influencers and so called journalist people should be given Nepal treatment

My response is in the plural and they bounce! The entire coverage shows no attempt at discussion on contentious issues. Meetings without agenda is a clear indication of what was happening! Lady, be good and stop defending the indefensible.

desperate attempt to defend CEC - don’t focus on disagreements but decisions taken; can u justify centralization of voter management system thru software denying access to EROs in states whose job it is ) which has led to selective deletion & addition of voters at central level?

Not naive but utter stupidity. Other ECs kept saying you are not following lawn and disagreed but CEC kept on taking devision which should have been “unanimous”. It’s nothing but arm twisting and playing with people’s right to vote which is the backbone of democracy. Govt=CEC

Seems lot of people hv been instructed & ordered to target @ritika_offl @IndianExpress for having done real journalism by bringing to light the Govt misdeeds thru institutions Commissioners of @ECISVEEP must resign & actions taken agst them

Please use logic. Agreement on any issue of the ECI has to be reached "before" it is implemented, not "after" it is put in practice. There has been a massive fraud committed by CEC taking decisions without majority in the three-member team. CEC must resign.

The outcome was not that great either….lakhs of voters were disenfranchised and now that they are appealing to be reinstated, we are told that it would take 12 years to resolve all the appeals. Why take such a step anyway? This is incomprehensible!

Expose eci hua hai dard inko ho raha hai... Daal mein kuch kaala hai

Tum jis responsibility ki baat kr rhi ho wo khud v dikhao thoda , BJP IT Cell ki trah kaam mt kro.

But disagreement in a corrupt inefficient institution like EC should ring alarm bells for the entire nation

Nice interpretation

@ECISVEEP के बचाव में @BJP4India की टूल किट शुरू हो चुकी है। जो स्वाभाविक भी है, क्योंकि तीर इलेक्शन कमीशन के रास्ते @narendramodi सरकार को लगा है जिसके द्वारा इलेक्शन कमीशन द्वारा घपले करवाए जा रहे हैं।

Even if consensus was reached, fact is that the damaging concerns raised about 97 Goa voters and mass deletion appeals running into lakhs through a software is still an on-ground reality till date. This revelation is beyond the EC's concerns and now is this country's concern.

The notes indicate that there was no final concensus. Don't try and defend the indefensible for your rotten bigotry....

Sanghi Chaddi Gang Auntie, first go and clean toilets of bjp leaders and clean potty of kids of bjp leaders

BJP IT cell has been activated again, this video doesn’t address any of the concerns.

I would agree except in the case of form.6 mr sandhu seems to have raised objections but the form.was still.published and he saw the reports in news and reacted. This is dissent after outxome not dissent during proceas

Ooo madam many got their names deleted We r not talking about 1-2 Lakhs it is So stop your hypothetical justification In any organisation this is called as incompetence And the first thing organisation will do is to fire them

You are beyond pathetic

Did you miss the point willingly? Decisions in EC were made without the knowledge of 2 ECs. They were denied role in the decision making itself.

It is not disagreement that the election commissioners are talking about. It is being kept in dark. 🙏🏼