Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

My last open-source skill, /no-ai-slop, clearly hit a nerve with 4K GitHub stars. Today, I’m introducing /human-review, another free AI skill I think you’ll love. Let’s face it - giving feedback to AI in chat is painful. Asking it to “update the 3rd paragraph” or “update image size to...

316,335 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat •via X (Twitter)

42 Kommentare

Profilbild von Carl Vellotti 🥞
Carl Vellotti 🥞vor 1 Monat

This is sick @petergyang! Funny enough I've been running almost exactly this with a skill i created called "/review-page" haha and was just working on a piece about how skills can basically be mini apps

Profilbild von Peter Yang
Peter Yangvor 1 Monat

nice great minds think alike :)

Profilbild von Ben G
Ben Gvor 1 Monat

For word docs, I would just tell codex to make them html and then use the annotate feature to request my edits. Of course, this was before voice mode…

Profilbild von Peter Yang
Peter Yangvor 1 Monat

Yep the annotate feature is great but I also want to make direct edits to html and markdown.

Profilbild von Mika Reyes ⚡️ Timerich AI
Mika Reyes ⚡️ Timerich AIvor 1 Monat

omg built this for myself (also called it google docs for my text files). was limited to just text edits though! this seems like it also includes visuals i.e. UI so might give it a spin!

Profilbild von Peter Yang
Peter Yangvor 1 Monat

lemme know how i can make it better!

Profilbild von Chris Lesinski
Chris Lesinskivor 1 Monat

Why did I think I was the only one with this problem? Great solution. Can’t wait to try it!

Profilbild von Ryan DesJardins
Ryan DesJardinsvor 1 Monat

AWESOME! I have been wanting something like this. After editing some pages a project I'm working on, the agent did exactly what it was told to do. I threw a star on there for you. Thanks!!

Profilbild von Patrick Tobler
Patrick Toblervor 1 Monat

the music so hype

Profilbild von Johannes Sundlo
Johannes Sundlovor 1 Monat

Nice one! Really enjoy the /no-ai-slop

Profilbild von Than Khine
Than Khinevor 1 Monat

You don’t use Claude’s native playground plug-in?

Profilbild von Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBack
Hussain Hashim | Building SundayBackvor 1 Monat

@petergyang love the idea of /human-review! seems like it’ll make AI feedback way less annoying. curious how it handles complex edits tho?

Profilbild von Blaze
Blazevor 1 Monat

能否开放0.0.0.0?好像无法使用ip访问,想提供给其他同事修改

Profilbild von Emad Ghorbaninia
Emad Ghorbaniniavor 1 Monat

The real tell that AI-generated code needs a human-review layer: we built an entire cottage industry of skills whose whole job is undoing what the first skill did.

Profilbild von Madhuri ✳︎
Madhuri ✳︎vor 1 Monat

so fun to see a skill version! i have been using this markdown-html version, i made myself. i was so sick of changes while working with ai.

Profilbild von Somya
Somyavor 1 Monat

yep, added inline comments to md files in PrettyMD for exactly this. drop a comment, thread with your agent gonna try yours now

Profilbild von Ivan Paudice
Ivan Paudicevor 1 Monat

How is this different from annotating and changing setting from codex preview?

Profilbild von Peter Yang
Peter Yangvor 1 Monat

You can make direct edits to text but yeah ultimately this should just be a harness native feature.

Profilbild von Feifei Qiu
Feifei Qiuvor 1 Monat

Next phase: human-review skill for AI video creation process in addition to html page

Profilbild von Peter Yang
Peter Yangvor 1 Monat

for AI video creation just use @HyperFrames_

Profilbild von Feifei Qiu
Feifei Qiuvor 1 Monat

@HyperFrames_ I use hyperframe skill for making video too. But last mile fine tune still takes time . Color , music , size of the image , wording , adjust motions etc

Profilbild von Peter Yang
Peter Yangvor 1 Monat

@HyperFrames_ you using it with fable? any design / video from scratch task i think fable is clearly better at than sol

Profilbild von xRazar
xRazarvor 1 Monat

@kunchenguid looks like lavish was ahead of it's time!

Profilbild von Wannabepis
Wannabepisvor 1 Monat

Why not use Lavish?

Profilbild von Ev Haus
Ev Hausvor 1 Monat

>...I just want to edit the text myself... Wild idea... but why can't you just do that? Stop being lazy. Open the code and edit it.

Profilbild von tongtongtongtongtong
tongtongtongtongtongvor 1 Monat

Very helpful, will test, thanks man!

Profilbild von Michael Freiwald
Michael Freiwaldvor 1 Monat

Uh this is good I build remark ( to comment on your markdown files. maybe I should extend it’s features 🤘

Profilbild von Kai
Kaivor 1 Monat

How does this differ from @kunchenguid lavish?

Profilbild von Nicole Stockdale
Nicole Stockdalevor 1 Monat

So it’s like the Claude Edit feature but for chat?!

Profilbild von 多森
多森vor 1 Monat

这很实用,我最近刚好遇到这个痛点

Profilbild von Yehya
Yehyavor 1 Monat

i’ve been using claude html artifacts for a similar workflow where I can just edit annotate confirm reject anything from am editor injected but i think this will streamline much better. Nice one.

Profilbild von sindikitil
sindikitilvor 1 Monat

The "update the 3rd paragraph" loop is painfully real. Curious how human-review structures feedback instead of just re-prompting.

Profilbild von Peetu
Peetuvor 1 Monat

Hallelujah yes thank you

Profilbild von Dawn(DaEun) Yi
Dawn(DaEun) Yivor 1 Monat

okay why havent i thought about this before

Profilbild von Sheldon ⚡ Hull
Sheldon ⚡ Hullvor 1 Monat

I've been using a comment sidecar. Editing the page directly is much cleaner. Nice thinking!

Profilbild von Mera Huang
Mera Huangvor 1 Monat

/no-ai-slop is one of my most-used skills. I use it almost every day! thanks

Profilbild von Delvyn OKR Studio
Delvyn OKR Studiovor 1 Monat

The chat-feedback problem is the same one teams have with goals. "Make it better" and "ship faster" both fail because there's nothing concrete to check the work against. Structure beats vibes the second you need to know if you're actually done.

Profilbild von Bruno Cordista
Bruno Cordistavor 1 Monat

Really nice!!

Profilbild von Lalala
Lalalavor 1 Monat

I’ve been using Deep Skill Finder to look for skills like this, and this one would fit perfectly. If you upload it to the Meyo Skill Marketplace, it’ll be much easier for people to discover.

Profilbild von 青雲
青雲vor 1 Monat

the review gate is the acceptance contract made visible: pause → human reads diff → approval before merge. that's boss-skill's BMAD shape, and the feedback loop is real: gate verdicts should persist to local state, so the next run starts from what was rejected.

Profilbild von Vishal Kapur
Vishal Kapurvor 1 Monat

Looks cool! You can have the skill detect if the user is running in and if so open your html file in toastty, right next to your agent sessions

Profilbild von Nick
Nickvor 1 Monat

A must-have skill

Ähnliche Videos

Systematic literature reviews take 12-18 months to complete. Looks like AI is going to fully automate systematic reviews sooner than later. SciSpace ( SciSpace) just launched an autonomous AI agent that conducts a systematic literature review with a single prompt. Go to scispace[.]com and run the following prompt: "Conduct a systematic literature review on [your topic]" SciSpace agent will generate research questions based on the PICO framework. You can review these questions and edit them according to your specific requirements. The agent will also draft screening criteria that you can edit according to your needs. Then the agent asks you to select the databases you want to use and the date range for paper. After this step, everything is fully automated. The agent will search for papers in the relevant databases, it will combine and rerank the papers. Then it will start the title and abstract screening and include the papers that meet the include criteria. In the next step, it will download the full text of included papers and screen them followed by data extraction. Based on the extracted data, it generates a complete systematic literature review and also a PRISMA diagram. It will also give you a table of papers included along with the rational for including them. The only thing that is keeping AI agents to fully automate systematic literature reviews fields is the papers behind paywalls. Check out the agent at scispace[.]com and see if you find its review useful.

Mushtaq Bilal, PhD

42,003 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Local AI 101: open models, Hugging Face, and businesses to build (38 min masterclass) I still think cloud AI is the default for most things, and honestly it should be, the frontier models are the strongest and easiest to use. But something shifted in the last 4-5 months. You can now run genuinely good open models directly on your own laptop, or even your phone. And once you actually try it, it changes how you think about what AI is even for. LOCAL AI, CLEARLY EXPLAINED: 1. The model is the brain doing the thinking. Gemma, Llama, Mistral, and Qwen are the main families, and each is better at different things, some at reasoning, some at coding, some small enough to run on a phone. 2. Hugging Face is the warehouse where you find them. You go there to see what each model is good at, check the license, and grab the compressed versions that run on a normal computer. 3. The software is what runs the model on your machine. Start with LM Studio if you're not technical, it feels like a normal app where you search, download, and start chatting. Ollama is the one you reach for when you want to plug a model into your own apps. 4. The workflow is the actual product you build on top of it all. That's what I'm ideating around for some businesses to create. I think local AI just made a specific kind of business way easier to start. Find an industry that: 1. Sits on sensitive data they'd never paste into ChatGPT 2. Does the same review over and over 3. Runs on software from 2003 Then build a local AI tool that does that review on their own machine, so the data never leaves the building! Take home health agencies. Nurses write visit notes all day, and if a note is missing a detail, the billing gets denied or the audit flags it. Here's how I'd start: 1. Find 5 small agencies. Offer to review a batch of their notes for them. 2. Run the notes through Gemma locally (free, private, no cloud). Read every output yourself. 3. Write down the 20 issues that keep showing up: missing vitals, vague med changes, notes that don't support the billed level. 4. That list of 20 is your checklist. The checklist is the product. 5. Turn it into a local desktop app that flags those 20 things before a note gets submitted. You just went from a service anyone could offer to a product nobody else has, and you learned exactly what to build by doing the work by hand first. Same recipe works for restoration contractors (draft the damage report on-site before the tech leaves) and wealth advisors (catch the compliance landmine in a client email before it sends). Basically the framework is sensitive data, repeated review, ancient software. I think there are tons of businesses like this! Almost none of it clicked for me until I actually started using local AI. So if you take one thing from this, go run a model on your own machine once. Also a fun thing to try with your friends. Feel free to send this to a friend. The episode is live for free on The Startup Ideas Podcast (SIP) 🧃 (thanks to Google for sponsoring today's episode and supporting local AI) I feel like local AI one of those things you need to try for it to really click. Run one model on your own machine and you'll see what I mean! I go way deeper in the full 38 minute masterclass, the models, the setup, and the businesses to build. Link below. LINK TO WATCH: OR WATCH BELOW ON X What do you think of local AI?

GREG ISENBERG

31,921 Aufrufe • vor 12 Tagen

PhD Students – How to automatically identify 90% of the issues in your research paper before you submit it to a journal? This is possible through manual or automated paper review. First, let’s understand the following. 𝐖𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐢𝐬 𝐚 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰? Paper review is a process in which subject matter experts evaluate your paper based on the following criteria: 1. Significance – Is this research important? 2. Novelty – Is this research new? 3. Methodology – Is this research carried out in the correct way? 4. Verifiability – Can other researchers verify this research? 5. Presentation – Is the research presented in the right way? 𝐖𝐡𝐲 𝐭𝐨 𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐞 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰𝐞𝐝 𝐛𝐞𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐮𝐛𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧? ➟ Identify the critical issues in your paper ➟ Fix those issues to increase the chances of your paper acceptance 𝐇𝐨𝐰 𝐭𝐨 𝐚𝐮𝐭𝐨𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐞 “𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟-𝐫𝐞𝐯𝐢𝐞𝐰” 𝐨𝐟 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐩𝐚𝐩𝐞𝐫? Paperpal just launched an amazing feature – AI Review. Using this feature, you can get instant self-feedback. This feature will help you in the following ways. ➝ Check for gaps in your logic ➝ Get feedback on the structure and flow of your writing ➝ Review your research questions ➝ Identify opportunities to strengthen your paper ➝ Increase the chances of your paper acceptance Here is a step-by-step process for using AI Review feature. Step 1: Go to and login. Step 2: Open an existing document or make a new document Step 3: Go to the right-side bar and click on checks | AI Review. Step 4: For this feature to work there should be more than 150 words. Step 5: Copy and paste your paper. Step 6: Now go to the right side and check the prompts Step 7: With these prompts, you will evaluate your paper. Step 8: You will find various prompts e.g., suggest writing feedback, check flow and structure etc. Step 9: You can select a prompt from the existing prompts or write your custom prompt and execute Step 10: Paperpal will generate feedback as per the prompt. Step 11: Read through the feedback and save it for further use. Use other specific prompts for tailored feedback. Step 12: This way you can evaluate various aspects of your paper yourself. This is a very customized and efficient way of automatically reviewing your paper. You can also go one step further to work on the feedback and improve your paper based on suggestions. Please note that AI Review feature does not replace human or expert reviewers in any way. This feature only aims to provide you with quick self-feedback. Try the AI Review feature of Paperpal. Paperpal link:

Faheem Ullah

15,270 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr