Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

My Orton-Gillingham training changed the way I approach reading instruction. I adapted many OG strategies for my #MLL students including Code packs. Code packs are an essential strategy for students who cannot guess or predict words they don’t know. The only way to read a word is by sounding...

41,202 görüntüleme • 3 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

10 Yorum

Kimiko Shibata 🦋 profil fotoğrafı
Kimiko Shibata 🦋3 yıl önce

@TLMarkides Really enjoyed the @IDA_Ontario spelling and decoding course. All of our MLL teachers made code packs in the Fall to use with our students as a result of this training. :)

Mr. K 🏫 ✊🏻🧙🏼‍♂️ profil fotoğrafı
Mr. K 🏫 ✊🏻🧙🏼‍♂️3 yıl önce

“Hard work is hard” 👏🏻👏🏻

Mme Lockhart profil fotoğrafı
Mme Lockhart3 yıl önce

That’s what Obama had in the Oval Office. Love it.

📖Stephanie Trees📖 profil fotoğrafı
📖Stephanie Trees📖3 yıl önce

Me too! It is hard to unsee it. It makes sense to provide this structure - all benefit from this approach.

girlmomma profil fotoğrafı
girlmomma3 yıl önce

I’m a parent and this is what I’ve started doing with my 4 year old JK (English though).

Lindsay Bliek profil fotoğrafı
Lindsay Bliek3 yıl önce

Who do you recommend for OG training in Canada (Alberta if that matters)?

Mme Lockhart profil fotoğrafı
Mme Lockhart3 yıl önce

I took my training from Liisa Freure in Toronto and I know @DrValdineB trains teachers across the country, too!

Terra Lynch profil fotoğrafı
Terra Lynch3 yıl önce

So happy to see this!!

Mme Lockhart profil fotoğrafı
Mme Lockhart3 yıl önce

It’s essential for our second and multi-language learners!!!

Dutchgirl profil fotoğrafı
Dutchgirl3 yıl önce

Decoding?

Benzer Videolar

Daniel Dennett on "deepities" the profound-sounding claims that are secretly empty Philosopher Daniel Dennett has a name for a type of statement that sounds wise but actually says nothing: a deepity. He explains it this way: "A deepity is an apparently profound observation that is ambiguous. It has two readings. On one reading it's obviously false, but if it were true it would be very important. And on the other it's trivially true." The trick is in the ambiguity. When you hear a deepity, part of your brain registers the trivially true reading and thinks yes, that's correct. But another part is reaching for the dramatic, important-sounding reading and that's where the illusion of profundity comes from. Dennett's favourite example, which he uses when teaching the concept to students: "Love is just a word." It sounds deep. Think about it for a moment and it feels like it's gesturing at something real. That love is intangible, constructed, perhaps even illusory. But Dennett dismantles it immediately: "Whatever love is, it isn't a word. You can't find love in the dictionary." That's the "use-mention error" confusing the word love with the thing love refers to. Once you put quotation marks around it properly, the statement collapses into something utterly banal: "love" is just a word. Well, yes. So is "cheeseburger." So is "word." The deepity survives only because we don't slow down enough to ask which reading we're actually accepting. Once you have the word "deepity," you start seeing them everywhere: in self-help, in politics, in philosophy.

Mateus — eu/acc 🇪🇺

26,540 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

This might be the best "AI Engineer" I've tried so far. ​ I'm an old school developer who started 30 years ago. I feel very uncomfortable letting AI take control of my code, but for the sake of science, I spent two hours building an application that took me weeks to build a couple of years ago. ​ I used Pythagora, a brand new tool backed by Y Combinator. They just released to the public. ​ Keep in mind that I use AI every day to write code, but Pythagora is something different: it's a tool that leads, and uses you—the human—as the copilot. ​ I go into more details in the video, but here is the TLDR; ​ 1. Holy molly! We've made a ton of progress on this front! This is way better than Devin when I tested it a few months back. ​ 2. Love the approach of generating a plan with sub-tasks before writing any code. ​ 3. The tools never tries to do too much: it tackles every small task one at a time, and gives you instructions so you test everything. ​ 4. It does exactly what you'd do when it gets stuck: writes a bunch of logs and uses those to correct itself. Pretty neat! ​ 5. It's fast. It runs locally. It's an extension to Visual Studio Code. ​ I'm impressed, but I don't think this tool is for me. ​ I'm not the type of developer who's ready to relinquish control. I felt I had no connection with the code because I didn't write it. It was not my code. ​ I know many people who don't care about this. I know many people who will get tremendous value out of Pythagora. I hope they keep pushing the limits, providing feedback, and helping this get to a point where old folks like me feel more comfortable using it. ​ Don't take my word for it. The best thing you can do is to give it a try and see how you feel using it. ​ Thanks to the team who built this, for all of the explanations and support, and especially, for sitting and listening to my dumb questions for 2 hours while I tested this.

Santiago

211,993 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce