Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

My position is being misunderstood, so let me clarify. In the first video, the officer is proposing to his legally wedded wife during a passing-out event. There is nothing objectionable in that, and I have no issue with it. My concern is with the second video. If the person...

NeerajRanjan84's profile picture

Neeraj Ranjan

7,151 subscribers

50,514 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

"A concerned Catholic church member has shared an image showing a priest with a firearm..........." Stop with the misinformation, the man in the screenshot below is a military chaplain with a rifle sling to his back during service, and it is common in the warfront, due to the fact that the service is being held in a combat zone and attack can happen at any time. It is not a recent video/screenshot as the video was recorded years ago.
0:15

"A concerned Catholic church member has shared an image showing a priest with a firearm..........." Stop with the misinformation, the man in the screenshot below is a military chaplain with a rifle sling to his back during service, and it is common in the warfront, due to the fact that the service is being held in a combat zone and attack can happen at any time. It is not a recent video/screenshot as the video was recorded years ago.

Daoptimist⚓🌊🔥✨

489,630 görüntüleme • 9 ay önce

Watching this video makes my jaw clench. Not because I see courage. Not because I see progress. It makes my jaw clench because I see a husband standing outside a women’s restroom while his wife is inside, and another person is demanding that he ignore what his own eyes can see. Put Democrat politics aside for a moment and think about the people you love. Imagine your wife is in that restroom. Imagine it’s your daughter, your granddaughter, your mother, or your sister. Most husbands like us, aren’t going to start debating social theories at that moment. Their first instinct is going to be the same instinct men have had for thousands of years: protect the women they love. That isn’t hatred. It isn’t fear. It’s responsibility. What makes this video so powerful is that it exposes a much bigger disagreement taking place across the country. One side believes that biological reality determines who belongs in male and female spaces. The other believes that personal identity should be the deciding factor. Those are fundamentally different starting points, and that’s why these encounters keep happening. The anger you’re seeing isn’t really about a restroom. It’s about whether ordinary people are still allowed to trust their own judgment, speak honestly about what they see, and protect the people they care about without being told they’re the problem. Millions of Americans like me, have reached the point where they are exhausted by being told that common sense is offensive. They are tired of being told that protecting women is somehow controversial. They are tired of being pressured to deny what they believe is objectively true in order to avoid criticism. That’s why videos like this resonate with so many people. They aren’t seeing a debate about a bathroom. They’re seeing a husband doing what husbands have always done: standing watch over the people entrusted to his care. And for many Americans, the line gets drawn right there. Not with my wife. Not with my daughter. Not with my family. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
0:10

Watching this video makes my jaw clench. Not because I see courage. Not because I see progress. It makes my jaw clench because I see a husband standing outside a women’s restroom while his wife is inside, and another person is demanding that he ignore what his own eyes can see. Put Democrat politics aside for a moment and think about the people you love. Imagine your wife is in that restroom. Imagine it’s your daughter, your granddaughter, your mother, or your sister. Most husbands like us, aren’t going to start debating social theories at that moment. Their first instinct is going to be the same instinct men have had for thousands of years: protect the women they love. That isn’t hatred. It isn’t fear. It’s responsibility. What makes this video so powerful is that it exposes a much bigger disagreement taking place across the country. One side believes that biological reality determines who belongs in male and female spaces. The other believes that personal identity should be the deciding factor. Those are fundamentally different starting points, and that’s why these encounters keep happening. The anger you’re seeing isn’t really about a restroom. It’s about whether ordinary people are still allowed to trust their own judgment, speak honestly about what they see, and protect the people they care about without being told they’re the problem. Millions of Americans like me, have reached the point where they are exhausted by being told that common sense is offensive. They are tired of being told that protecting women is somehow controversial. They are tired of being pressured to deny what they believe is objectively true in order to avoid criticism. That’s why videos like this resonate with so many people. They aren’t seeing a debate about a bathroom. They’re seeing a husband doing what husbands have always done: standing watch over the people entrusted to his care. And for many Americans, the line gets drawn right there. Not with my wife. Not with my daughter. Not with my family. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

A Gene Robinson

790,628 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Is this Tilling or Deep Ripping? And I didn't realize that there's a debate about the benefits of Tilling. So - To Til, or Not To Til! That is the question!
0:14

Is this Tilling or Deep Ripping? And I didn't realize that there's a debate about the benefits of Tilling. So - To Til, or Not To Til! That is the question!

AllieJade

16,488 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

They started with 50. Now they say they’re 18,000 In 1996 there were fewer than 50 of them. Today, according to the organizers, up to 18,000 walked through Copenhagen. From Dronning Louises Bro to the Imam Ali Mosque. Look at the curve. This is how it happens. First a handful. Then a few hundred. Then it fills a bridge, a district, a capital. A little at a time, until it is no longer a little. And let me be fair, because fairness is the point. There is nothing strange about them holding this mourning procession. They have done it as part of their faith for more than a thousand years. It is theirs, and they believe in it. There is nothing strange about that at all. What should stop us is the other half. There is nothing strange about Europe allowing it either, and that is exactly the problem. Europe allows it because Europe has forgotten who it is. A people that remembers what it stands for does not need to ban anything, it simply knows where its own line runs. We have lost that. And so the issue was never them. The issue is us. Now look at what actually moved through the streets. Men in front. Women in the second row. That is not a detail, that is the whole point. It is a view of women set into a system and marched out into the public square, in a city where generations fought for women and men to stand as equals. The real question is not whether people may believe what they want. They may. The question is why our capital should cultivate a political law-religion that commemorates a 7th-century power struggle by dividing people by sex on Nørrebrogade. One of the organizers is the Imam Ali Mosque, repeatedly described as the Iranian regime’s extended arm in Denmark. The same regime that hangs women and young men from cranes. We are not importing culture. We are importing a system. And we let it grow, not because they are strong, but because we forgot why we were. First a little. Then a lot. Then too late.
0:10

They started with 50. Now they say they’re 18,000 In 1996 there were fewer than 50 of them. Today, according to the organizers, up to 18,000 walked through Copenhagen. From Dronning Louises Bro to the Imam Ali Mosque. Look at the curve. This is how it happens. First a handful. Then a few hundred. Then it fills a bridge, a district, a capital. A little at a time, until it is no longer a little. And let me be fair, because fairness is the point. There is nothing strange about them holding this mourning procession. They have done it as part of their faith for more than a thousand years. It is theirs, and they believe in it. There is nothing strange about that at all. What should stop us is the other half. There is nothing strange about Europe allowing it either, and that is exactly the problem. Europe allows it because Europe has forgotten who it is. A people that remembers what it stands for does not need to ban anything, it simply knows where its own line runs. We have lost that. And so the issue was never them. The issue is us. Now look at what actually moved through the streets. Men in front. Women in the second row. That is not a detail, that is the whole point. It is a view of women set into a system and marched out into the public square, in a city where generations fought for women and men to stand as equals. The real question is not whether people may believe what they want. They may. The question is why our capital should cultivate a political law-religion that commemorates a 7th-century power struggle by dividing people by sex on Nørrebrogade. One of the organizers is the Imam Ali Mosque, repeatedly described as the Iranian regime’s extended arm in Denmark. The same regime that hangs women and young men from cranes. We are not importing culture. We are importing a system. And we let it grow, not because they are strong, but because we forgot why we were. First a little. Then a lot. Then too late.

Krisztina Maria

38,814 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Contrary to information being peddled out there - this is what I have learnt in my conversations in the past day: Pakistan field Marshal Asim Munir’s arrival in Saudi is the result of growing concerns in Riyadh, Beijing and Rawalpindi over worsening US rhetoric on Iran - with possibly a new military offensive by US-Israel in the coming days/weeks. The Saudis are in contact with the Houthis in Yemen via Iran at the same time Pakistan’s FM is in China as part of his country’s strategic dialogue with Beijing And Pakistan’s military chief is in Saudi What I am being told is “it is no longer about Field Marshal Asim Munir’s personal ambitions vis-a-vis UAE or even Trump’s Gaza International Stabilization Force - “Islamabad/Pindi has been pushed to draw a line in the sand - as there are very real fears of a spillover into Pakistan and Saudi Arabia if the U.S./Israel attacks Iran”
0:13

Contrary to information being peddled out there - this is what I have learnt in my conversations in the past day: Pakistan field Marshal Asim Munir’s arrival in Saudi is the result of growing concerns in Riyadh, Beijing and Rawalpindi over worsening US rhetoric on Iran - with possibly a new military offensive by US-Israel in the coming days/weeks. The Saudis are in contact with the Houthis in Yemen via Iran at the same time Pakistan’s FM is in China as part of his country’s strategic dialogue with Beijing And Pakistan’s military chief is in Saudi What I am being told is “it is no longer about Field Marshal Asim Munir’s personal ambitions vis-a-vis UAE or even Trump’s Gaza International Stabilization Force - “Islamabad/Pindi has been pushed to draw a line in the sand - as there are very real fears of a spillover into Pakistan and Saudi Arabia if the U.S./Israel attacks Iran”

علی مصطفی | Ali Mustafa

37,358 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Billie Eilish spent years telling the country that wealth is the problem. Then she dropped a new $88 perfume and asked the same fans to buy it. That is not activism. That is a storefront with a sermon attached. You do not get to scold billionaires for keeping too much money and then charge working people nearly a hundred dollars for cocoa and vanilla. You do not get to talk about a broken world and then treat the same audience as a checkout line. The scent is not the issue. The act is. If the lecture was the point, she would not need another product. She needed another product. That is the whole story. Give us a break.
0:15

Billie Eilish spent years telling the country that wealth is the problem. Then she dropped a new $88 perfume and asked the same fans to buy it. That is not activism. That is a storefront with a sermon attached. You do not get to scold billionaires for keeping too much money and then charge working people nearly a hundred dollars for cocoa and vanilla. You do not get to talk about a broken world and then treat the same audience as a checkout line. The scent is not the issue. The act is. If the lecture was the point, she would not need another product. She needed another product. That is the whole story. Give us a break.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

12,308 görüntüleme • 1 gün önce

As a gynecologist, one of the most frequently asked questions is about the ''hymen''. The hymen is not a structure located deep inside the vagina. It is a thin, flexible fold of tissue situated very close to the vaginal opening, anatomically at the entrance of the vaginal canal. It is typically found about 1–2 cm inside the vaginal opening, but in many women, it is almost at the surface. Therefore, the common belief that it is located deep inside is incorrect. One of the most important points is this: The hymen is not a closed membrane. It naturally has openings that allow menstrual blood to pass. Additionally, the structure of the hymen varies from person to person. Its thickness, elasticity, and shape are not standard. In some women, it may be very thin and elastic, while in others, it may be minimal or barely noticeable. This is completely a normal anatomical variation. A common misconception is that changes in the hymen occur only due to sexual intercourse. In reality, factors such as certain physical activities or tampon use can also lead to stretching or changes in this tissue. Therefore, the hymen is not a reliable indicator of a person’s sexual history or “virginity.” In summary, the hymen is a small and variable anatomical structure. The meanings attributed to it are largely shaped by sociocultural beliefs rather than medical facts.
0:10

As a gynecologist, one of the most frequently asked questions is about the ''hymen''. The hymen is not a structure located deep inside the vagina. It is a thin, flexible fold of tissue situated very close to the vaginal opening, anatomically at the entrance of the vaginal canal. It is typically found about 1–2 cm inside the vaginal opening, but in many women, it is almost at the surface. Therefore, the common belief that it is located deep inside is incorrect. One of the most important points is this: The hymen is not a closed membrane. It naturally has openings that allow menstrual blood to pass. Additionally, the structure of the hymen varies from person to person. Its thickness, elasticity, and shape are not standard. In some women, it may be very thin and elastic, while in others, it may be minimal or barely noticeable. This is completely a normal anatomical variation. A common misconception is that changes in the hymen occur only due to sexual intercourse. In reality, factors such as certain physical activities or tampon use can also lead to stretching or changes in this tissue. Therefore, the hymen is not a reliable indicator of a person’s sexual history or “virginity.” In summary, the hymen is a small and variable anatomical structure. The meanings attributed to it are largely shaped by sociocultural beliefs rather than medical facts.

Op. Dr. Mehmet Bekir Şen

116,046 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

Respect according to Trump: when hegemony becomes a mirage By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 "We are a country that is more respected than we have ever been respected before." This is Donald Trump's solemn proclamation about the war against Iran. A phrase that sounds like a declaration of imperial self-satisfaction... except that on the ground in the Middle East, "respect" increasingly resembles a mixture of anxiety, mistrust, and strategic calculation. Because if we listen to the Gulf capitals, the problem is no longer Iran. The problem is America. First, there is the question of protection. For decades, the oil monarchies have lived under the American security umbrella. Military bases, a fleet in the Gulf, missile defense: the implicit contract was simple, Washington protects, the oil monarchies align their interests. But the current war has cracked that pact. Iranian strikes against facilities in the region, including sites linked to the American military presence, have been a brutal reminder that these states remain exposed despite the American arsenal. As a result, even the most loyal allies are beginning to have doubts. According to several analyses cited by Foreign Policy, the Gulf monarchies are "questioning Washington's ability and willingness to guarantee their security" after the Iranian attacks. Diplomatic translation: the American bodyguard may not be as reliable as its press conference claims. Then there is the geopolitical reality that no one is saying too loudly: this war increasingly looks like a war waged by Israel with US military power. The Gulf states do not want to participate in a prolonged campaign against Tehran or serve as a platform for escalation. Several governments have made it clear that they do not want their territory or airspace to be used to attack Iran. In other words: thanks for the military bases, but you're on your own when it comes to war. Finally, there is the factor that is most damaging to the American image: the unintended demonstration of vulnerability. Iran obviously cannot compete with American military power. But it can strike where it hurts: scattered bases, energy infrastructure, the Strait of Hormuz. Since the escalation began, drone and missile attacks and the disruption of maritime traffic have shown that even the world's most powerful military empire cannot completely secure the region. It is precisely this type of asymmetric warfare that erodes the influence of a superpower. Iran does not need to win militarily; it only needs to demonstrate that American hegemony is no longer unchallenged. And this is where Trump's statement becomes almost comical. Because in the history of international relations, respect is not proclaimed. It is observed. When allies start looking for assurances elsewhere, towards China, Russia, or regional arrangements, that is not respect. It is a survival strategy in an international system where the Pax Americana increasingly resembles a museum relic. Trump believes that war proves American power. In much of the Middle East, it proves something else: that even empires have cracks. And that sometimes, the adversary does not even need to widen them. It is enough that they are visible.
0:16

Respect according to Trump: when hegemony becomes a mirage By Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆 "We are a country that is more respected than we have ever been respected before." This is Donald Trump's solemn proclamation about the war against Iran. A phrase that sounds like a declaration of imperial self-satisfaction... except that on the ground in the Middle East, "respect" increasingly resembles a mixture of anxiety, mistrust, and strategic calculation. Because if we listen to the Gulf capitals, the problem is no longer Iran. The problem is America. First, there is the question of protection. For decades, the oil monarchies have lived under the American security umbrella. Military bases, a fleet in the Gulf, missile defense: the implicit contract was simple, Washington protects, the oil monarchies align their interests. But the current war has cracked that pact. Iranian strikes against facilities in the region, including sites linked to the American military presence, have been a brutal reminder that these states remain exposed despite the American arsenal. As a result, even the most loyal allies are beginning to have doubts. According to several analyses cited by Foreign Policy, the Gulf monarchies are "questioning Washington's ability and willingness to guarantee their security" after the Iranian attacks. Diplomatic translation: the American bodyguard may not be as reliable as its press conference claims. Then there is the geopolitical reality that no one is saying too loudly: this war increasingly looks like a war waged by Israel with US military power. The Gulf states do not want to participate in a prolonged campaign against Tehran or serve as a platform for escalation. Several governments have made it clear that they do not want their territory or airspace to be used to attack Iran. In other words: thanks for the military bases, but you're on your own when it comes to war. Finally, there is the factor that is most damaging to the American image: the unintended demonstration of vulnerability. Iran obviously cannot compete with American military power. But it can strike where it hurts: scattered bases, energy infrastructure, the Strait of Hormuz. Since the escalation began, drone and missile attacks and the disruption of maritime traffic have shown that even the world's most powerful military empire cannot completely secure the region. It is precisely this type of asymmetric warfare that erodes the influence of a superpower. Iran does not need to win militarily; it only needs to demonstrate that American hegemony is no longer unchallenged. And this is where Trump's statement becomes almost comical. Because in the history of international relations, respect is not proclaimed. It is observed. When allies start looking for assurances elsewhere, towards China, Russia, or regional arrangements, that is not respect. It is a survival strategy in an international system where the Pax Americana increasingly resembles a museum relic. Trump believes that war proves American power. In much of the Middle East, it proves something else: that even empires have cracks. And that sometimes, the adversary does not even need to widen them. It is enough that they are visible.

Brainless Partisans 🏴‍☠️☢️☣️🪆

19,501 görüntüleme • 5 ay önce

the ‘oh my god’ in delete ya being the same as the one in chateau.. the concept of chateau being about meeting and falling in love and delete ya being about wanting to let go but finding it so hard and the ‘oh my god’ is literally in the line ‘then i’d be happy just to meet ya’…
0:18

the ‘oh my god’ in delete ya being the same as the one in chateau.. the concept of chateau being about meeting and falling in love and delete ya being about wanting to let go but finding it so hard and the ‘oh my god’ is literally in the line ‘then i’d be happy just to meet ya’…

rhys

24,146 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Murder, Transgenderism, and the Objective Standard of Satanic Evil Ladies and gentlemen, let us strip away the smokescreens and evasions. We are not dealing here with a matter of opinion, preference, or private taste. We are dealing with evil—real, objective, and knowable. The modern skeptic loves to pretend that evil is subjective—that murder is a matter of circumstance, that mutilating one’s body is a matter of personal expression, that words like Satanic are nothing more than medieval insults hurled by the ignorant. This is false, cowardly, and beneath the dignity of serious men. The Catholic standard is not opinion. It is not relative. It is objective truth, revealed by God, reasoned by the Church, and confirmed by the bloody consequences of rebellion played out before our eyes. Murder is not a “choice.” It is not a “right.” It is the deliberate destruction of innocent life. Christ Himself declared the devil “a murderer from the beginning.” When children are slaughtered in schools, in churches, or in the womb, we are not witnessing a “social issue.” We are seeing Satan’s hand at work. Transgenderism is not harmless. It is not compassion. It is mutilation of the body, desecration of God’s image, and rejection of creation itself. To say “I can change my sex” is to spit in the face of the Creator and to echo the serpent’s first lie: “You shall be as gods.” It is anti-Christic at its core because it denies Christ, who is Truth and who is Logos, order itself. You may sneer and call this rhetoric. You may flatter yourself with relativism. But relativism is not sophistication; it is rebellion dressed up as philosophy. The Church has never wavered: murder and the willful defacement of God’s creation are grave offenses, condemned not by my opinion, but by eternal law. They are Satanic because they participate in the same rebellion that cast Lucifer from heaven and continues in every age to drag souls into hell. To call murder and transgender ideology Satanic is not an exaggeration. It is accuracy. It is fidelity to the truth that does not bend to fashion, ideology, or your skepticism. If this offends you, it is not because the standard is false. It is because you are standing against it. Evil exists. Its fruits are visible. Its rebellion is named. The only question left is whether you will recognize it and stand against it, or excuse it and be consumed by it.
0:12

Murder, Transgenderism, and the Objective Standard of Satanic Evil Ladies and gentlemen, let us strip away the smokescreens and evasions. We are not dealing here with a matter of opinion, preference, or private taste. We are dealing with evil—real, objective, and knowable. The modern skeptic loves to pretend that evil is subjective—that murder is a matter of circumstance, that mutilating one’s body is a matter of personal expression, that words like Satanic are nothing more than medieval insults hurled by the ignorant. This is false, cowardly, and beneath the dignity of serious men. The Catholic standard is not opinion. It is not relative. It is objective truth, revealed by God, reasoned by the Church, and confirmed by the bloody consequences of rebellion played out before our eyes. Murder is not a “choice.” It is not a “right.” It is the deliberate destruction of innocent life. Christ Himself declared the devil “a murderer from the beginning.” When children are slaughtered in schools, in churches, or in the womb, we are not witnessing a “social issue.” We are seeing Satan’s hand at work. Transgenderism is not harmless. It is not compassion. It is mutilation of the body, desecration of God’s image, and rejection of creation itself. To say “I can change my sex” is to spit in the face of the Creator and to echo the serpent’s first lie: “You shall be as gods.” It is anti-Christic at its core because it denies Christ, who is Truth and who is Logos, order itself. You may sneer and call this rhetoric. You may flatter yourself with relativism. But relativism is not sophistication; it is rebellion dressed up as philosophy. The Church has never wavered: murder and the willful defacement of God’s creation are grave offenses, condemned not by my opinion, but by eternal law. They are Satanic because they participate in the same rebellion that cast Lucifer from heaven and continues in every age to drag souls into hell. To call murder and transgender ideology Satanic is not an exaggeration. It is accuracy. It is fidelity to the truth that does not bend to fashion, ideology, or your skepticism. If this offends you, it is not because the standard is false. It is because you are standing against it. Evil exists. Its fruits are visible. Its rebellion is named. The only question left is whether you will recognize it and stand against it, or excuse it and be consumed by it.

Joe McBride

184,871 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Love for humanity is the core of love for life. It arises from the recognition of life’s value and beauty, from faith in humanity’s ability for greatness, and from the awareness that you are its child — and that it is dear and close to you. : The author places love for humanity at the heart of love for life itself. It springs from a clear recognition of life’s immense value and beauty, from an unwavering faith in humanity’s capacity for greatness, and from the intimate awareness that each person is humanity’s own child, bound to it by blood, spirit, and destiny. This love is not distant admiration. It is the quiet, fierce tenderness a child feels for the parent who gave it existence. Humanity is dear and close because it is the living source from which we draw breath, meaning, and possibility. To love life is to love the collective that carries it forward. To doubt humanity is to doubt life’s own worth. When we see ourselves as its children, gratitude replaces judgment. Hope replaces despair. Love for humanity becomes the deepest form of self-love, because we are not separate from it. It is the recognition that every stranger carries a piece of the same miracle we carry in ourselves. That recognition turns strangers into kin, and the world into home.
0:15

Love for humanity is the core of love for life. It arises from the recognition of life’s value and beauty, from faith in humanity’s ability for greatness, and from the awareness that you are its child — and that it is dear and close to you. : The author places love for humanity at the heart of love for life itself. It springs from a clear recognition of life’s immense value and beauty, from an unwavering faith in humanity’s capacity for greatness, and from the intimate awareness that each person is humanity’s own child, bound to it by blood, spirit, and destiny. This love is not distant admiration. It is the quiet, fierce tenderness a child feels for the parent who gave it existence. Humanity is dear and close because it is the living source from which we draw breath, meaning, and possibility. To love life is to love the collective that carries it forward. To doubt humanity is to doubt life’s own worth. When we see ourselves as its children, gratitude replaces judgment. Hope replaces despair. Love for humanity becomes the deepest form of self-love, because we are not separate from it. It is the recognition that every stranger carries a piece of the same miracle we carry in ourselves. That recognition turns strangers into kin, and the world into home.

Zafar Mirzo | Quotes

287,911 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

What struck me about this video of “fake virginity blood” being sold in Northern Nigeria is not the product itself, but the moral education that makes such a product necessary. Deception does not appear out of nowhere. It is learned. And as bell hooks reminds us, patriarchy is one of the most effective schools of deception we have. When a society places impossible and one-sided moral demands on women, while demanding almost nothing from men, it does not produce virtue. It produces performance. Virginity here is not really about sex. It is about proof. About a woman’s body being turned into evidence. The hymen becomes a certificate of value. Blood becomes currency. Honour becomes something that must be staged convincingly enough to satisfy male judgment. Growing up in Northern Nigeria, many of us heard the stories in whispers. Rumours about the lengths people went to preserve the myth of virginity. Women avoiding vaginal penetration entirely. Anal sex used as a workaround, so that on the wedding night the illusion could be completed. Blood shown. Husband reassured. Honour “intact.” Everyone colluding in a lie that everyone knows is a lie. This is not moral decay. It is moral absolutism doing what it always does. It teaches people how to deceive in order to survive. bell hooks writes that patriarchy teaches men and women to lie in different ways. Men learn to lie about vulnerability. They are trained to suppress fear, tenderness, emotional need, because honesty would cost them power or status. Women, on the other hand, learn to lie to stay safe. They learn that telling the truth about their bodies, desires, or histories can bring punishment, abandonment, or violence. So women learn concealment. Performance. Strategic silence. Seen this way, fake virginity blood is not shocking. It is logical. It is a market solution to a moral contradiction. If a woman’s worth is reduced to an anatomical fiction, she will find a way to manufacture that fiction. And we must ask the obvious question: where is the demand for virginity from men? Where is the obsession with their bodies as proof of moral worth? Where are the rituals, the products, the inspections? Men are assumed whole by default. Women must prove themselves worthy. The tragedy is not that women deceive. The tragedy is that honesty is made dangerous for them. A society that truly cared about morality would start with symmetry. It would care less about blood on bedsheets and more about kindness, responsibility, and mutual respect. Until then, deception will continue to flourish. Not because women are immoral, but because patriarchy demands purity while rewarding power. And whenever purity is demanded without justice, lies will follow.
0:13

Sensitive content

What struck me about this video of “fake virginity blood” being sold in Northern Nigeria is not the product itself, but the moral education that makes such a product necessary. Deception does not appear out of nowhere. It is learned. And as bell hooks reminds us, patriarchy is one of the most effective schools of deception we have. When a society places impossible and one-sided moral demands on women, while demanding almost nothing from men, it does not produce virtue. It produces performance. Virginity here is not really about sex. It is about proof. About a woman’s body being turned into evidence. The hymen becomes a certificate of value. Blood becomes currency. Honour becomes something that must be staged convincingly enough to satisfy male judgment. Growing up in Northern Nigeria, many of us heard the stories in whispers. Rumours about the lengths people went to preserve the myth of virginity. Women avoiding vaginal penetration entirely. Anal sex used as a workaround, so that on the wedding night the illusion could be completed. Blood shown. Husband reassured. Honour “intact.” Everyone colluding in a lie that everyone knows is a lie. This is not moral decay. It is moral absolutism doing what it always does. It teaches people how to deceive in order to survive. bell hooks writes that patriarchy teaches men and women to lie in different ways. Men learn to lie about vulnerability. They are trained to suppress fear, tenderness, emotional need, because honesty would cost them power or status. Women, on the other hand, learn to lie to stay safe. They learn that telling the truth about their bodies, desires, or histories can bring punishment, abandonment, or violence. So women learn concealment. Performance. Strategic silence. Seen this way, fake virginity blood is not shocking. It is logical. It is a market solution to a moral contradiction. If a woman’s worth is reduced to an anatomical fiction, she will find a way to manufacture that fiction. And we must ask the obvious question: where is the demand for virginity from men? Where is the obsession with their bodies as proof of moral worth? Where are the rituals, the products, the inspections? Men are assumed whole by default. Women must prove themselves worthy. The tragedy is not that women deceive. The tragedy is that honesty is made dangerous for them. A society that truly cared about morality would start with symmetry. It would care less about blood on bedsheets and more about kindness, responsibility, and mutual respect. Until then, deception will continue to flourish. Not because women are immoral, but because patriarchy demands purity while rewarding power. And whenever purity is demanded without justice, lies will follow.

Elnathan John

318,603 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

With all due respect sir, It is clear that the left most lane, where a motorcycle is seen in the video from the design unveiling ceremony, is not there in the actual bridge. In the actual bridge, this lane is probably narrower than planned, leading to its conversion into a walkway. May be this is what the Speaker was talking about ? 🤷🏻‍♀️
0:13

With all due respect sir, It is clear that the left most lane, where a motorcycle is seen in the video from the design unveiling ceremony, is not there in the actual bridge. In the actual bridge, this lane is probably narrower than planned, leading to its conversion into a walkway. May be this is what the Speaker was talking about ? 🤷🏻‍♀️

Hathu ✈️

16,592 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

IF ETHEREUM DOES A TEXTBOOK WYCKOFF SPRING, THE PATH IS BRUTAL. $2,400-$2,700 first. Then $1,475 that clears every long and short in the same move. Then the run to $5,000. The spring is the trap Wyckoff wrote about in 1931. If it comes, do not sell it. It is the setup.
0:19

IF ETHEREUM DOES A TEXTBOOK WYCKOFF SPRING, THE PATH IS BRUTAL. $2,400-$2,700 first. Then $1,475 that clears every long and short in the same move. Then the run to $5,000. The spring is the trap Wyckoff wrote about in 1931. If it comes, do not sell it. It is the setup.

Merlijn The Trader

85,447 görüntüleme • 9 gün önce

Anyone who supports Kwankwaso and Peter Obi is not doing it for personal gain or money. Those who truly know Peter Obi know he is not known for distributing money to win support. The same applies to Kwankwaso—his support base is not built on financial influence. So, when you see people in the Obi/Kwankwaso movement, you know it is not about material gain. It is about conviction, belief, and a sense of competence and credibility. It is about what people are convinced of and what they believe is right. ✊🇳🇬 ——Barr. Abba Hikima Fagge
0:16

Anyone who supports Kwankwaso and Peter Obi is not doing it for personal gain or money. Those who truly know Peter Obi know he is not known for distributing money to win support. The same applies to Kwankwaso—his support base is not built on financial influence. So, when you see people in the Obi/Kwankwaso movement, you know it is not about material gain. It is about conviction, belief, and a sense of competence and credibility. It is about what people are convinced of and what they believe is right. ✊🇳🇬 ——Barr. Abba Hikima Fagge

Baffa🔴

19,989 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent $120,000 on Wednesday to fly home. That is not a fresh start. It is the same old act with a bigger receipt. They chartered a Bombardier Global Express XRS from California to Birmingham at about $12,000 an hour. Two bathrooms. Five beds. Seats for 13. They said the dogs needed the plane. Fine. The rest of us still see the invoice. They walked away from royal life because it was supposedly too much. Then they came back the same way they left: private, insulated, and expensive. The sermons were about humility. The travel is about comfort. You cannot lecture people about how to live while burning six figures to skip the airport line. This is not mystery. It is branding. Privacy when it helps. Luxury when it counts. If anyone else did this after years of moral lectures, the press would call it what it is. Hypocrisy with a wet tarmac. The plane is empty in the video for a reason. The story is not the family. It is the bill.
0:15

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle spent $120,000 on Wednesday to fly home. That is not a fresh start. It is the same old act with a bigger receipt. They chartered a Bombardier Global Express XRS from California to Birmingham at about $12,000 an hour. Two bathrooms. Five beds. Seats for 13. They said the dogs needed the plane. Fine. The rest of us still see the invoice. They walked away from royal life because it was supposedly too much. Then they came back the same way they left: private, insulated, and expensive. The sermons were about humility. The travel is about comfort. You cannot lecture people about how to live while burning six figures to skip the airport line. This is not mystery. It is branding. Privacy when it helps. Luxury when it counts. If anyone else did this after years of moral lectures, the press would call it what it is. Hypocrisy with a wet tarmac. The plane is empty in the video for a reason. The story is not the family. It is the bill.

Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸

571,847 görüntüleme • 3 gün önce

This album is not only about love, life, and tragedy, but also the beauty that can come from it all. This is the most vulnerable material I’ve ever released, and it is cathartic to share my story in this way. The 'Love Life Tragedy' album is a thank you to everyone who has loved and supported me for who I am - the artist, the husband, the father, the human being. I am very proud of this album and am excited to share it. Listen to 'Love Life Tragedy' here:
0:13

This album is not only about love, life, and tragedy, but also the beauty that can come from it all. This is the most vulnerable material I’ve ever released, and it is cathartic to share my story in this way. The 'Love Life Tragedy' album is a thank you to everyone who has loved and supported me for who I am - the artist, the husband, the father, the human being. I am very proud of this album and am excited to share it. Listen to 'Love Life Tragedy' here:

Nick Carter

64,364 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

This Facebook page, which he claims is part of his “marketing efforts” is using my name,and pretending to be me. To clarify, this is not me, and I have not worked with the individual who runs this page in five years.
0:13

Sensitive content

This Facebook page, which he claims is part of his “marketing efforts” is using my name,and pretending to be me. To clarify, this is not me, and I have not worked with the individual who runs this page in five years.

Ellie The Empress

64,154 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce